A cable modem termination system (CMTS) is communication equipment typically located in a cable operator's headend facility. The CMTS provides high-speed data services, such as cable Internet or voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), to customer locations. An example of a CMTS is the Motorola Broadband Service Router 64000 (BSR 64000).
A hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) network is a broadband network that combines optical fiber and coaxial cable to provide two-way communication between the CMTS and a cable modem or multimedia terminal adapter (MTA). The cable modem is a communication device located at the customer location that receives communication signals from the CMTS on downstream channels, and transmits the other communication signals to the CMTS on upstream channels. The MTA is a communication device at the customer location that provides both the functionality of a cable modem, and VoIP telephone service communication.
Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) is an international telecommunications standard that permits the addition of high-speed data transfer to an existing cable television system. Channel bonding is a DOCSIS 3.0 feature that enables a cable modem at a customer location to use multiple downstream channels, or multiple upstream channels, together at the same time. For example, a cable modem configured with four upstream channels can use DOCSIS 3.0 channel bonding to increase the throughput of the upstream communication with the CMTS. The cable modem distributes, or segments, the data packets among the four channels in an upstream bonding group and transmits the data packets to the CMTS in parallel, rather than in series.
The “DOCSIS 3.0 MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface Specification” defines the “T4 timeout” parameter as the time that a cable modem will wait for unicast ranging opportunity. In addition, the “DOCSIS 3.0 MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface Specification” states that “In Multiple Transmit Channel Mode the CMTS MAY increase the value of the T4 timeout by means of the T4 Timeout Multiplier in order to reduce CMTS overhead associated with scheduling RNG-REQ slots and processing RNG-RSP messages.” Thus, if a CMTS vendor chooses to implement the T4 Timeout Multiplier, they may schedule the ranging messages between the CMTS and the cable modems less frequently when operating in upstream channel bonding mode.
Customer locations typically always power-on a cable modem to provide the customer with instant access to the Internet, and in the case of an MTA, also to ensure that the customer's telephone service is always available. Anytime the cable modem is powered-on, whether idle or transmitting data, it must maintain registration with the CMTS and participate in the calculation of the upstream channel quality metric, such as a digital modulation quality metric like the modulation error ratio (MER), or a power-based signal quality metric like the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR or S/N). When the cable modem is not transmitting data, it relies solely on ranging messages to maintain registration and for the calculation of the upstream channel quality measurements.
In an exemplary prior art system, a CMTS configured to use DOCSIS 3.0 upstream channel bonding may communicate with a DOCSIS 3.0 bonded cable modem configured with the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier. If the cable modem uses, for example, four upstream channels in a bonding group and a ranging interval for each upstream channel of 10 seconds, for example, the T4 Timeout Multiplier is set to 4 (i.e., the number of bonded channels) and the ranging interval increases to 40 seconds (4×10 seconds). However, the CMTS also periodically monitors the quality of the upstream channels by retrieving the upstream channel SNR measurements, for example, every 10 seconds, especially when the cable modem includes a VoIP adapter. Since the T4 Timeout Multiplier increases the ranging interval, when the cable modem is not transmitting data, and since the calculation of the SNR measurements relies solely on the ranging messages, the use of the T4 Timeout Multiplier can affect the accuracy of the SNR measurements. Regardless of the approach taken, the prior art CMTS that implements the T4 Timeout Multiplier suggested by DOCSIS to reduce the ranging traffic can create a problem with the channel quality measurements. The following two examples illustrate the possible impact on the accuracy of the SNR measurements.
In the first example, when the prior art CMTS monitors the upstream channel quality by retrieving the SNR measurements for the channel from a single modem, the cable modem will complete its first ranging exchange, and will wait 40 seconds (4×10 seconds) before the next ranging exchange. After the cable modem completes its first ranging exchange, the CMTS can measure the quality of the channel by retrieving the SNR statistics for the channel from its Broadcom registers, and clearing those registers to prepare for the next SNR measurement. These SNR statistics are valid. Since the CMTS monitors the quality of the upstream channels periodically, but before the next ranging interval, the next time the CMTS measures the quality of the channel, if the cable modem is idle during that period (“idle” meaning no ranging or data passing), the SNR statistics will be zero because the previous reading of the SNR statistics cleared the Broadcom registers that store the SNR data. This will continue until the CMTS measures the quality of the channel after the next ranging exchange. When the SNR statistics are zero, the CMTS is not able to determine the quality of the channel. Thus, in this example, the T4 Timeout Multiplier suggested by DOCSIS to reduce the ranging traffic causes a problem with the channel quality measurements.
In the second example, when the prior art CMTS monitors the upstream channel quality by averaging the SNR measurement for the channel from all the cable modems using the channel, the cable modems will complete their first ranging exchange, and will wait, for example, 40 seconds (4×10 seconds) before the next ranging exchange. After the cable modems complete their first ranging exchange, the CMTS measures the quality of the channel by retrieving the SNR statistics for the channel from its Broadcom registers, and clearing those registers to prepare for the next SNR measurement. These SNR statistics are valid. Since ranging exchanges occur, for example, every 40 seconds, and channel quality is monitored, for example, every 10 seconds, the first time the SNR statistics are retrieved following a ranging exchange the SNR statistics are valid, but SNR statistics for the channel on all of the modems cannot be trusted because not all the cable modems range at the same time. Laboratory experiments that included between 50 and 100 cable modems on an upstream channel that was unimpaired resulted in average channel SNR measurements of 42, 40, 23, 18, 38, and 42. The inconsistency of these SNR measurement will result in the prior art CMTS spectrum management services swapping frequencies or modulation profiles unnecessarily because it will think that the channel has gone from unimpaired to impaired and back to unimpaired.
Since the CMTS can reduce the frequency of the exchange of ranging messages, there is a need to maintain the stability of the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system when the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier is in use.
A method and computing device are provided for maintaining the stability of the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system. The method configures a cable modem, that communicates using bonded channels, to periodically exchange ranging messages on the bonded channels, where a bonded channel ranging interval determines a period for the exchange. The method also monitors a signal quality metric for a monitored channel of the bonded channels by periodically retrieving a quality measurement for the monitored channel, a period between each retrieval determined by a channel quality monitoring interval. The method sends an invite ranging message to the cable modem before retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel, and retrieves the quality measurement for the monitored channel. The method bases the signal quality metric for the monitored channel on the quality measurement.
The IP network 110 shown in
The cable network 130 shown in
The CMTS 120, in one embodiment, is communication equipment located in a cable operator's headend or hubsite that provides high-speed data services, such as cable Internet or voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), to cable subscribers. The CMTS 120 shown in
The customer location 140 shown in
The cable modem 142 shown in
The processor 155 performs the disclosed methods by executing sequences of operational instructions that comprise each computer program resident in, or operative on, the memory 170. The reader should understand that the memory 170 may include operating system, administrative, and database programs that support the programs disclosed in this application. In one embodiment, the configuration of the memory 170 of the cable modem 142 includes a DOCSIS 172 service. In one embodiment, the DOCSIS 172 service is an implementation of DOCSIS 3.0, or similar service, that provides upstream channel bonding to support allocating traffic across two or more upstream channels. The DOCSIS 172 service on the cable modem 142 together with the DOCSIS 122 and spectrum management 124 services, and SNR stability program 126 on the CMTS 120 perform a method according to an embodiment, e.g., as disclosed in the exemplary embodiments depicted in
As shown in
Although the disclosed embodiments describe a fully functioning method and computing device for maintaining the stability of the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system when the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier is in use, the reader should understand that other equivalent embodiments exist. Since numerous modifications and variations will occur to those reviewing this disclosure, the method and computing device for maintaining the stability of the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system when the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier is in use is not limited to the exact construction and operation illustrated and disclosed. Accordingly, this disclosure intends all suitable modifications and equivalents to fall within the scope of the claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3838221 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 4245342 | Entenman | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4385392 | Angell et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4811360 | Potter | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4999787 | McNally et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5228060 | Uchiyama | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5251324 | McMullan | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5271060 | Moran et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5278977 | Spencer et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5347539 | Sridhar et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5390339 | Bruckert et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5463661 | Moran et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5532865 | Utsumi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5557603 | Barlett et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5606725 | Hart | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5631846 | Szurkowski | May 1997 | A |
| 5692010 | Nielsen | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5694437 | Yang et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5732104 | Brown et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5790523 | Ritchie et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5862451 | Grau et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5867539 | Koslov | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870429 | Moran et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5886749 | Williams et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5939887 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943604 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5987061 | Chen | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002722 | Wu | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6032019 | Chen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6044107 | Gatherer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6061393 | Tsui et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6108351 | Hardy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6154503 | Strolle | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6229792 | Anderson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6230326 | Unger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233274 | Tsui et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240553 | Son et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6272150 | Hrastar et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6278730 | Tsui et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6308286 | Richmond et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310909 | Jones | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6321384 | Eldering | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6330221 | Gomez | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334219 | Hill et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6377552 | Moran et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385773 | Schwartzman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6389068 | Smith et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6434583 | Dapper et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445734 | Chen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6456597 | Bare | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6459703 | Grimwood et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6477197 | Unger | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480469 | Moore et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6483033 | Simoes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6498663 | Farhan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6512616 | Nishihara | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6526260 | Hick et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6546557 | Ovadia | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6556239 | Al Araji et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6556562 | Bhagavath et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6556660 | Li et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6559756 | Al Araji et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6563868 | Zhang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6570394 | Williams | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6570913 | Chen | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6574797 | Naegeli et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6588016 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6606351 | Dapper et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6611795 | Cooper | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6646677 | Noro et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6662135 | Burns et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6662368 | Cloonan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6671334 | Kuntz et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6687632 | Rittman | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690655 | Miner et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6700875 | Schroeder et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6700927 | Esliger et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711134 | Wichelman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6741947 | Wichelman et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6748551 | Furudate et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757253 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6772388 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6772437 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6775840 | Naegel et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6816463 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6834057 | Rabenko et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6839829 | Daruwalla et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6853932 | Wichelman et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6877166 | Roeck et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6895043 | Naegeli et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6895594 | Simoes et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6906526 | Hart et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6928475 | Schenkel et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6944881 | Vogel | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6961314 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6961370 | Chappell | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6967994 | Boer et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6973141 | Isaksen et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6985437 | Vogel | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6987754 | Shahar et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6999408 | Gomez | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7002899 | Azenkot et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7010002 | Chow et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7017176 | Lee et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7032159 | Lusky et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7039939 | Millet et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7050419 | Azenkot et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054554 | McNamara et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7058007 | Daruwalla et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7072365 | Ansley | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7079457 | Wakabayashi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7099412 | Coffey | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7099580 | Bulbul | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7139283 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7142609 | Terreault et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7145887 | Akgun et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7152025 | Lusky et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7158542 | Zeng et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7164694 | Nodoushani et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7177324 | Choudhury et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7197067 | Lusky et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7222255 | Claessens et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7227863 | Leung et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7242862 | Saunders et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7246368 | Millet et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7263123 | Yousef | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7274735 | Lusky et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7295518 | Monk et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7315573 | Lusky et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7315967 | Azenko et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7400677 | Jones | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7421276 | Steer et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7451472 | Williams | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7492703 | Lusky et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7554902 | Kim et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7573884 | Klimker et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7573935 | Min et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7584298 | Klinker et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7616654 | Moran et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7650112 | Utsumi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7672310 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7684315 | Beser | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7684341 | Howald | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7693090 | Kimpe | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7701938 | Bernstein et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7716712 | Booth et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7739359 | Millet et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7742697 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742771 | Thibeault | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7760624 | Goodson et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7778314 | Wajcer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7787557 | Kim et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7792183 | Massey et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7826569 | Popper et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7856049 | Currivan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7876697 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7953144 | Allen et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7958534 | Beser | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7970010 | Denney et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7983162 | Ford et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 8000254 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8037541 | Montague et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8040915 | Cummings | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8059546 | Pai et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8081674 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8116360 | Thibeault | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8265559 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8284828 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8345557 | Thibeault et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 20010055319 | Quigley et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020038461 | White et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020044531 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091970 | Furudate et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116493 | Schenkel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119783 | Bourlas et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154620 | Azenkot et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020168131 | Walter et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020181395 | Foster et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030028898 | Howald | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043732 | Walton et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030067883 | Azenkot et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030067944 | Sala et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101463 | Greene et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120819 | Abramson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138250 | Glynn | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149991 | Reidhead et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158940 | Leigh | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179768 | Lusky et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179770 | Reznic et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179821 | Lusky et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181185 | Lusky et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182664 | Lusky et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185176 | Lusky et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030188254 | Lusky et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200317 | Zeitak et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212999 | Cai | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015765 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042385 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040047284 | Eidson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052248 | Frank et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052356 | McKinzie et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040062548 | Obeda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073937 | Williams | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040096216 | Ito | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040109661 | Bierman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139473 | Greene | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040163129 | Chapman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181811 | Rakib | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040208513 | Peddanarappagari et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233234 | Chaudhry et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233926 | Cummings | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040248520 | Miyoshi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040261119 | Williams et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050010958 | Rakib et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050025145 | Rakib et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050034159 | Ophir et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050039103 | Azenko et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050058082 | Moran et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064890 | Johan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097617 | Currivan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108763 | Baran et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050122996 | Azenkot et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163088 | Yamano et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050175080 | Bouillett | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050183130 | Sadja et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198688 | Fong | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050226161 | Jaworski | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281200 | Terreault | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060013147 | Terpstra et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088056 | Quigley et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121946 | Walton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250967 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262722 | Chapman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070002752 | Thibeault et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070030805 | Pantelias et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070058542 | Thibeault | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076592 | Thibeault | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076789 | Thibeault | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076790 | Thibeault et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086328 | Kao et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094691 | Gazdzinski | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070097907 | Cummings | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121712 | Okamoto | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133672 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143654 | Joyce et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070147489 | Sun et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070177526 | Siripunkaw et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184835 | Bitran et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070189770 | Sucharczuk et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070201547 | Willcocks et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070206600 | Klimker et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070206625 | Maeda | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211618 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070223512 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070223513 | Pantelias et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070223920 | Moore et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070245177 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080056713 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080062888 | Lusky et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065960 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080069006 | Walter et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080075157 | Allen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101210 | Thompson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080125984 | Skendzic et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140823 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080193137 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080200129 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080242339 | Anderson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250508 | Montague et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080274700 | Li | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080291840 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090031384 | Brooks et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090103557 | Hong et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090103669 | Kolze et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090109877 | Murray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135754 | Yavuz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090249421 | Liu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090252234 | Samdani et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100083356 | Steckley et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095360 | Pavlovski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128739 | Jung et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100154016 | Li et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100154017 | An et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100157824 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100158093 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185391 | Lee et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223650 | Millet et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251320 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110026577 | Primo et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110030019 | Ulm et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069745 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110072127 | Gerber et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110110415 | Cooper et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110150058 | Oh | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110153683 | Hoskinson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110194418 | Wolcott et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110194597 | Wolcott et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110197071 | Wolcott et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110243214 | Wolcott et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120027069 | Clausen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120054312 | Salinger | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120084416 | Thibeault et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120093240 | McFarland et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120147751 | Ulm | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20130041990 | Thibeault et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130051442 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128723 | Thibeault et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130148707 | Thibeault et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130286852 | Bowler et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130290783 | Bowler et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130290791 | Basile et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130291034 | Basile et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130294489 | Thibeault et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140029654 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140029655 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140133533 | Thibeault et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140185428 | Thibeault et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 69631420 | Dec 2004 | DE |
| 1235402 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| 1341335 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 55132161 | Oct 1980 | JP |
| 04208707 | Jul 1992 | JP |
| 6120896 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| 6177840 | Jun 1994 | JP |
| 09008738 | Jan 1997 | JP |
| 9162816 | Jun 1997 | JP |
| 10247893 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 11230857 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 2001044956 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2003530761 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2004172783 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004343678 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 0192901 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| 0233974 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| 2004062124 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| 2009146426 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2011097646 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications DOCSIS® 3.0—MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface Specification, Nov. 17, 2011 (770 pages). |
| PCT Search Report & Written Opinion, Re: Application #PCT/US2013/038718, Oct. 8, 2013. |
| “Access, Terminals, Transmission and Mutliplexing (ATTM); Third Generation Transmission Systems for Interactive Cable Television Services—IP Cable Modems; Part 4: MAC and Upper Layer Protocols; DOCSIS 3.0”, European Standard, European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), vol. ATTM AT3, No. V1.1.1., Nov. 1, 2011, pp. 100-111. |
| Cisco Systems, Inc., “Configuring Load Balancing and Dynamic Channel Change (DCC) on the Cisco CMTS”, URL: www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/cable/cmts/troubleshooting—batch9/cmtslbg.pdf (dated Jan. 2009). |
| B. Volpe, “DOCSIS 3.0 Partial Service”, The Volpe Firm, URL: volpefirm.com/docsis-3-0-partial-service (blog posting dated Jul. 12, 2011). |
| B. Volpe, “DOCSIS 3.0 Tutorial—Upstream Channel Bonding”, The Volpe Firm, URL: volpefirm.com/upstream-channel-bonding (blog posting dated Aug. 22, 2010). |
| B. Volpe, et al., “Cable-Tec Expo 2011: Advanced Troubleshooting in a DOCSIS 3.0 Plant”, The Volpe Firm, URL: http://bradyvolpe.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/VM—Expo2011—v1-blog.pdf (dated Nov. 2011). |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. “Upstream Channel Bonding”, URL: www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/cable/configuration/guide/ubr—uscb.pdf (dated Nov. 2009 and last updated Jul. 2012). |
| “A Simple Algorithm for Fault Localization Using Naming Convention and Micro-reflection Signature,” Invention Disclosure 60193, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Jun. 2008, p. 2. |
| “Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications DOCSIS 3.0: MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface,” CM-SP-MULPIv3.0-116-110623, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Jun. 2011, section 8, pp. 242-266. |
| “DOCSIS Best Practices and Guidelines; Proactive Network Maintenance Using Pre-Equalization,” CM-GL-PNMP-V01-100415, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., pp. 123. |
| “Pre-Equalization Based Pro-active Network Maintenance Process Model for CMs Transmitting on Multiple Upstream Channels,” Invention Disclosure 60203, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., May 2009, pp. 2. |
| “Pre-Equalization based pro-active network maintenance process model,” Invention Disclosure 60177, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Jun. 2008, pp. 2. |
| “Proactive Network Maintenance Using Pre-Equalization,” DOCSIS Best Practices and Guidelines, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., CM-GL-PNMP-V02-110623, Jun. 23, 2011, pp. 133. |
| “Radio Frequency Interface Specification,” Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications DOCSIS 2.0, CM-SP-RFIv2.0-I06-040804, pp. 524. |
| Campos, L. A., et al., “Pre-equalization based Pro-active Network Maintenance Methodology,” Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., (presentation), 2012, pp. 32. |
| Howald, R. L., et al., “Customized Broadband—Analysis Techniques for Blended Multiplexes,” pp. 12. |
| Howald, R., “Access Networks Solutions: Introduction to S-CDMA,” Presentation to Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) South Florida Chapter, Motorola, Inc., 2009, pp. 15. |
| Howald, R., “Upstream Snapshots & Indicators (2009),” Regional Samples, Presentation to Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) South Florida Chapter, Jan. 2010, pp. 22. |
| Howald, R., et al., “Characterizing and Aligning the HFC Return Path for Successful DOCSIS 3.0 Rollouts,” Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) Cable Tee Expo, Oct. 2009, pp. 66. |
| Howald, R., et al., “Docsis 3.0 Upstream: Readiness & Qualification,” pp. 17. |
| Howald, R., et al., “The Grown-Up Potential of a Teenage Phy,” pp. 65. |
| Howald, R.,“DOCSIS 3.0 Upstream: Technology, RF Variables & Case Studies,” Access Networks Solutions, 2009, presentation to Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) South Florida Chapter, Jan. 2010, pp. 23. |
| Hranac, R., “Linear Distortions, Part 1,” Communication Technology, Jul. 1, 2005, accessed at www.cable360.net/print/ct/operations/testing/15131.html, pp. 6. |
| Liu, X., and Bernstein, A., “Variable Bit Rate Video Services in DOCSIS 3.0 Networks,” NCTA Technical Papers, 2008, pp. 12. |
| Motorola., “White Paper: Expanding Bandwidth Using Advanced Spectrum Management,” Sep. 25, 2003, pp. 12. |
| Newton's Telecom Dictionary, Sep. 1995, Flatiron Publishing, 9th Edition, pp. 216 and 1023, definitions of “carrier to noise ratio” and “signal to noise ratio”. |
| Patrick, M., and Joyce, G., “Delivering Economical IP Video over DOCSIS by Bypassing the M-CMTS with DIBA,” SCTE 2007 Emerging Technologies, Topic Subject: Service Velocity & Next Generation Architectures: How Do We Get There?, 2007, pp. 17. |
| Popper, A., et al, “An Advanced Receiver with Interference Cancellation for Broadband Cable Networks,” Juniper Networks, International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications Access 2002, pp. 23-1-23-6. |
| Popper, A., et al, “Ingress Noise Cancellation for the Upstream Channel in Broadband Cable Access Systems,” Juniper Networks, IEEE International Conference on Communications 2002, vol. 3, pp. 1808-1812. |
| Qureshi, S. U. H., “Adaptive Equalization,” IEEE, vol. 73, No. 9, Sep. 1985, pp. 1349-1387. |
| Ramakrishnan, S., “Scaling the DOCSIS Network for IPTV,” Cisco Systems, Inc., SCTE Conference on Emerging Technologies and the NCTA Cable Show, 2009, pp. 19. |
| Shelke, Y. R., “Knowledge Based Topology Discovery and Geo-localization,” Thesis, 2010, pp. 173. |
| Thompson, R., et al., “256-QAM for Upstream HFC,” Spring Technical Forum Proceedings, 2010, pp. 142-152. |
| Thompson, R., et al., “256-QAM for Upstream HFD Part Two,” SCTE Cable Tec Expo 2011, Technical Paper, pp. 22. |
| Thompson, R., et al., “Multiple Access Made Easy,” SCTE Cable Tec Expo 2011, Technical Paper, pp. 23. |
| Thompson, R., et al., “Optimizing Upstream Throughput Using Equalization Coefficient Analysis,” National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) Technical Papers, Apr. 2009, pp. 35. |
| Thompson, R., et al., “Practical Considerations for Migrating the Network Toward All-Digital,” Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) Cable-Tec Expo, Oct. 2009, pp. 22. |
| Thompson, R., et al., “64-QAM, 6.4MHz Upstream Deployment Challenges,” SCTE Canadian Summit, Toronto, Canada, Technical Paper, Mar. 2011, pp. 25. |
| Volpe, B., and Miller, W., “Cable-Tec Expo 2011: Advanced Troubleshooting in a DOCSIS © 3.0 Plant,” Nov. 14-17, 2011, pp. 17. |
| Wolcott, L., “Modem Signal Usage and Fault Isolation,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/301,835, filed Feb. 5, 2010. |
| Zhao, F., et al., “Techniques for minimizing error propagation in decision feedback detectors for recording channels,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 12. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130294489 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |