Ensure upstream channel quality measurement stability in an upstream channel bonding system using T4 timeout multiplier

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9065731
  • Patent Number
    9,065,731
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 1, 2012
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 23, 2015
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method and computing device for maintaining the stability of the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system. The method configures a cable modem, that communicates using bonded channels, to periodically exchange ranging messages on the bonded channels, where a bonded channel ranging interval determines a period for the exchange. The method also monitors a signal quality metric for a monitored channel of the bonded channels by periodically retrieving a quality measurement for the monitored channel, a period between each retrieval determined by a channel quality monitoring interval. The method sends an invite ranging message to the cable modem before retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel, and retrieves the quality measurement for the monitored channel. The method bases the signal quality metric for the monitored channel on the quality measurement.
Description
BACKGROUND

A cable modem termination system (CMTS) is communication equipment typically located in a cable operator's headend facility. The CMTS provides high-speed data services, such as cable Internet or voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), to customer locations. An example of a CMTS is the Motorola Broadband Service Router 64000 (BSR 64000).


A hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) network is a broadband network that combines optical fiber and coaxial cable to provide two-way communication between the CMTS and a cable modem or multimedia terminal adapter (MTA). The cable modem is a communication device located at the customer location that receives communication signals from the CMTS on downstream channels, and transmits the other communication signals to the CMTS on upstream channels. The MTA is a communication device at the customer location that provides both the functionality of a cable modem, and VoIP telephone service communication.


Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) is an international telecommunications standard that permits the addition of high-speed data transfer to an existing cable television system. Channel bonding is a DOCSIS 3.0 feature that enables a cable modem at a customer location to use multiple downstream channels, or multiple upstream channels, together at the same time. For example, a cable modem configured with four upstream channels can use DOCSIS 3.0 channel bonding to increase the throughput of the upstream communication with the CMTS. The cable modem distributes, or segments, the data packets among the four channels in an upstream bonding group and transmits the data packets to the CMTS in parallel, rather than in series.


The “DOCSIS 3.0 MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface Specification” defines the “T4 timeout” parameter as the time that a cable modem will wait for unicast ranging opportunity. In addition, the “DOCSIS 3.0 MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface Specification” states that “In Multiple Transmit Channel Mode the CMTS MAY increase the value of the T4 timeout by means of the T4 Timeout Multiplier in order to reduce CMTS overhead associated with scheduling RNG-REQ slots and processing RNG-RSP messages.” Thus, if a CMTS vendor chooses to implement the T4 Timeout Multiplier, they may schedule the ranging messages between the CMTS and the cable modems less frequently when operating in upstream channel bonding mode.


Customer locations typically always power-on a cable modem to provide the customer with instant access to the Internet, and in the case of an MTA, also to ensure that the customer's telephone service is always available. Anytime the cable modem is powered-on, whether idle or transmitting data, it must maintain registration with the CMTS and participate in the calculation of the upstream channel quality metric, such as a digital modulation quality metric like the modulation error ratio (MER), or a power-based signal quality metric like the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR or S/N). When the cable modem is not transmitting data, it relies solely on ranging messages to maintain registration and for the calculation of the upstream channel quality measurements.


In an exemplary prior art system, a CMTS configured to use DOCSIS 3.0 upstream channel bonding may communicate with a DOCSIS 3.0 bonded cable modem configured with the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier. If the cable modem uses, for example, four upstream channels in a bonding group and a ranging interval for each upstream channel of 10 seconds, for example, the T4 Timeout Multiplier is set to 4 (i.e., the number of bonded channels) and the ranging interval increases to 40 seconds (4×10 seconds). However, the CMTS also periodically monitors the quality of the upstream channels by retrieving the upstream channel SNR measurements, for example, every 10 seconds, especially when the cable modem includes a VoIP adapter. Since the T4 Timeout Multiplier increases the ranging interval, when the cable modem is not transmitting data, and since the calculation of the SNR measurements relies solely on the ranging messages, the use of the T4 Timeout Multiplier can affect the accuracy of the SNR measurements. Regardless of the approach taken, the prior art CMTS that implements the T4 Timeout Multiplier suggested by DOCSIS to reduce the ranging traffic can create a problem with the channel quality measurements. The following two examples illustrate the possible impact on the accuracy of the SNR measurements.


In the first example, when the prior art CMTS monitors the upstream channel quality by retrieving the SNR measurements for the channel from a single modem, the cable modem will complete its first ranging exchange, and will wait 40 seconds (4×10 seconds) before the next ranging exchange. After the cable modem completes its first ranging exchange, the CMTS can measure the quality of the channel by retrieving the SNR statistics for the channel from its Broadcom registers, and clearing those registers to prepare for the next SNR measurement. These SNR statistics are valid. Since the CMTS monitors the quality of the upstream channels periodically, but before the next ranging interval, the next time the CMTS measures the quality of the channel, if the cable modem is idle during that period (“idle” meaning no ranging or data passing), the SNR statistics will be zero because the previous reading of the SNR statistics cleared the Broadcom registers that store the SNR data. This will continue until the CMTS measures the quality of the channel after the next ranging exchange. When the SNR statistics are zero, the CMTS is not able to determine the quality of the channel. Thus, in this example, the T4 Timeout Multiplier suggested by DOCSIS to reduce the ranging traffic causes a problem with the channel quality measurements.


In the second example, when the prior art CMTS monitors the upstream channel quality by averaging the SNR measurement for the channel from all the cable modems using the channel, the cable modems will complete their first ranging exchange, and will wait, for example, 40 seconds (4×10 seconds) before the next ranging exchange. After the cable modems complete their first ranging exchange, the CMTS measures the quality of the channel by retrieving the SNR statistics for the channel from its Broadcom registers, and clearing those registers to prepare for the next SNR measurement. These SNR statistics are valid. Since ranging exchanges occur, for example, every 40 seconds, and channel quality is monitored, for example, every 10 seconds, the first time the SNR statistics are retrieved following a ranging exchange the SNR statistics are valid, but SNR statistics for the channel on all of the modems cannot be trusted because not all the cable modems range at the same time. Laboratory experiments that included between 50 and 100 cable modems on an upstream channel that was unimpaired resulted in average channel SNR measurements of 42, 40, 23, 18, 38, and 42. The inconsistency of these SNR measurement will result in the prior art CMTS spectrum management services swapping frequencies or modulation profiles unnecessarily because it will think that the channel has gone from unimpaired to impaired and back to unimpaired.


Since the CMTS can reduce the frequency of the exchange of ranging messages, there is a need to maintain the stability of the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system when the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier is in use.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram that illustrates an example of hardware components of a system that performs in accordance with an embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a message flow diagram that illustrates a method for stabilizing the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system when the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier is in use according to an embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram that illustrates a method for stabilizing the upstream channel quality measurements when monitoring the upstream channel quality by retrieving the upstream channel quality measurements for a channel from a single modem according to an embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram that illustrates a method for stabilizing the upstream channel quality measurements when monitoring the upstream channel quality by averaging the upstream channel quality measurements for a channel from all the cable modems using the channel according to an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A method and computing device are provided for maintaining the stability of the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system. The method configures a cable modem, that communicates using bonded channels, to periodically exchange ranging messages on the bonded channels, where a bonded channel ranging interval determines a period for the exchange. The method also monitors a signal quality metric for a monitored channel of the bonded channels by periodically retrieving a quality measurement for the monitored channel, a period between each retrieval determined by a channel quality monitoring interval. The method sends an invite ranging message to the cable modem before retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel, and retrieves the quality measurement for the monitored channel. The method bases the signal quality metric for the monitored channel on the quality measurement.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram that illustrates an example of hardware components of a system that performs in accordance with an embodiment. A broadband network 100 includes an Internet protocol (IP) network 110, cable modem termination system (CMTS) 120, cable network 130, and customer location 140. The broadband network 100 shown in FIG. 1 may include any number of interconnected IP network 110, CMTS 120, cable network 130, and customer location 140 components.


The IP network 110 shown in FIG. 1, in one embodiment, is a public communication network or wide area network (WAN) that connects to the CMTS 120. An embodiment also contemplates the use of comparable network architectures including a LAN, a personal area network (PAN) such as a Bluetooth network, a wireless LAN (e.g., a wireless-fidelity (Wi-Fi) network), peer-to-peer overlay network, and a virtual private network (VPN). The system contemplates comparable network architectures and protocols such as Ethernet and transmission control protocol.


The cable network 130 shown in FIG. 1, in one embodiment, is a hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) network. The cable network 130 is a data and video content network that provides two-way communication between the CMTS 120 and customer location 140.


The CMTS 120, in one embodiment, is communication equipment located in a cable operator's headend or hubsite that provides high-speed data services, such as cable Internet or voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), to cable subscribers. The CMTS 120 shown in FIG. 1 is a computing device that provides the customer location 140 with Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) 122 and spectrum management 124 services, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) stability program 126, and connections to the IP network 110 and cable network 130. The DOCSIS 122 service is an implementation of DOCSIS 3.0, or similar service, that provides upstream channel bonding to support allocating traffic across two or more upstream channels. The spectrum management 124 service is an implementation of the DOCSIS 3.0 spectrum management, or a similar service, that monitors channels in an upstream bonding group to determine whether those channels are clean enough to transmit data packets successfully, or impaired and not likely to transmit data packets successfully. In one embodiment, the spectrum management 124 service retrieves SNR statistics 125 from the CMTS 120 Broadcom registers for the channel that it is monitoring. The DOCSIS 122 and spectrum management 124 services, and SNR stability program 126 together with the cable modem 142 perform a method disclosed in the exemplary embodiments depicted in FIG. 2, FIG. 3, and FIG. 4. The connection to the IP network 110 enable the CMTS 120 to provide access to external services such as video servers, public switched telephone network voice, multimedia messages, and Internet data. In another embodiment, the CMTS 120 monitors the upstream channel quality measurement by providing a modulation error ratio (MER) stability program, rather than the SNR stability program 126, and the spectrum management 124 service retrieves MER statistics, rather than SNR statistics 125. Even though this description describes the use of SNR statistics 125 to stabilize the upstream channel SNR measurement, one skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments can similarly utilize MER statistics to stabilize the upstream channel MER measurements.


The customer location 140 shown in FIG. 1 is a customer's home, business, or another location where the customer accesses the cable service. In one embodiment, the customer location 140 includes a cable modem 142, set-top box 144, and display device 146. In other embodiments, the set-top box 144 is a digital television (DTV) Converter (DTC) or other customer-premises equipment (CPE), and the display device 146 is an Internet protocol television (IPTV) or analog television. In yet another embodiment, the set-top box 144 includes the cable modem 142. Optionally, the cable modem 142 is a multimedia terminal adapter (MTA) that provides all of the functionality of a cable modem, as well as a VoIP adapter that connects the cable modem 142 to a telephone 148 at the customer location 140.


The cable modem 142 shown in FIG. 1, in an illustrative example, is a general-purpose computing device that performs, in accordance with an embodiment, together with the DOCSIS 122 and spectrum management 124 services, and SNR stability program 126 on the CMTS 120. A bus 150 is a communication medium connecting a processor 155, data storage device 160 (such as a serial ATA (SATA) hard disk drive, optical drive, small computer system interface (SCSI) disk, flash memory, or the like), communication interface 165, and memory 170 (such as random access memory (RAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), non-volatile computer memory, flash memory, or the like). The communication interface 165 connects the cable modem 142 to the cable network 130 and allows for two-way communication of data and content. Optionally, the bus 150 connects a VoIP adapter 175 to a telephone 148 and provides telephone service communication. In one embodiment, the set-top box 144 includes the cable modem 142 implemented as an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC).


The processor 155 performs the disclosed methods by executing sequences of operational instructions that comprise each computer program resident in, or operative on, the memory 170. The reader should understand that the memory 170 may include operating system, administrative, and database programs that support the programs disclosed in this application. In one embodiment, the configuration of the memory 170 of the cable modem 142 includes a DOCSIS 172 service. In one embodiment, the DOCSIS 172 service is an implementation of DOCSIS 3.0, or similar service, that provides upstream channel bonding to support allocating traffic across two or more upstream channels. The DOCSIS 172 service on the cable modem 142 together with the DOCSIS 122 and spectrum management 124 services, and SNR stability program 126 on the CMTS 120 perform a method according to an embodiment, e.g., as disclosed in the exemplary embodiments depicted in FIG. 2, FIG. 3, and FIG. 4. When the processor 155 performs the disclosed method, it stores intermediate results in the memory 170 or data storage device 160. In another embodiment, the processor 155 may swap these programs, or portions thereof, in and out of the memory 170 as needed, and thus may include fewer than all of these programs at any one time.



FIG. 2 is a message flow diagram that illustrates a method for stabilizing the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system when the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier is in use according to one embodiment. The embodiment shown in FIG. 2, with reference to FIG. 1, illustrates an exemplary message flow between the CMTS 120 and the cable modem 142. The CMTS 120 uses DOCSIS 3.0 upstream channel bonding to communicate with the cable modem 142, a DOCSIS 3.0 bonded modem configured with the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier. Similar to the exemplary prior art system described above, the cable modem 142 uses, for example, four upstream channels in a bonding group with a ranging interval for each upstream channel of 10 seconds, for example, and sets the T4 Timeout Multiplier, for example, to 4 (i.e., the number of bonded channels). Thus, the use of the T4 Timeout Multiplier increases the ranging interval, for example, to 40 seconds (4×10 seconds) for the upstream channels in the bonding group.


As shown in FIG. 2, the cable modem 142 begins the message flow by sending a range request message to the CMTS 120 (step 210). In various embodiments, the range request message is the DOCSIS 3.0 RNG-REQ, INIT-RNG-REQ, and B-INIT-RNG-REQ. After the CMTS 120 receives the range request message, it sends a range response message with the T4 Timeout Multiplier set to a value that will increase the T4 timeout (step 220). In one embodiment, the range response message is the DOCSIS 3.0 RNG-RSP. After sending the range response message, the CMTS 120 detects that the spectrum management 124 service is about to monitor the upstream channel quality by retrieving the SNR statistics 125 (step 230). In one embodiment, the CMTS 120 sets a ranging timer to fire between 1 and 2 seconds before retrieving the SNR statistics 125. When the CMTS 120 detects this situation, it sends an invite ranging message to the cable modem 142 that is used to monitor the channel (step 240). In one embodiment, the invite ranging message is a request to schedule an opportunity for the cable modem 142 to range. Thus, when the CMTS 120 invites the modem to range, it gives the cable modem 142 an immediate opportunity to send a RNG-REQ (station maintenance request message). This RNG-REQ is what puts the valid data in the Broadcom chip that the system needs to collect for the SNR measurement. In response, the cable modem 142 immediately sends a range request message to the CMTS 120 (step 250), that triggers the CMTS 120 to send a range response message with the T4 Timeout Multiplier set to a value that will increase the T4 timeout (step 260). In one embodiment, the range request message is the DOCSIS 3.0 RNG-REQ, and the range response message is the DOCSIS 3.0 RNG-RSP. The spectrum management 124 service of the CMTS 120 then retrieves the SNR statistics 125 (step 270). In another embodiment, the detection by the CMTS 120 of the upcoming retrieval of SNR statistics 125 (step 230) includes a determination that the channel has been idle since the previous retrieval of the SNR statistics 125.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram that illustrates a method for stabilizing the upstream channel quality measurements when monitoring the upstream channel quality by retrieving the upstream channel quality measurements for a channel from a single modem according to one embodiment. The process 300 presumes that the cable modem 142 has been configured to communicate using bonded channels, and has begun exchanging ranging messages on the bonded channels at a bonded channel ranging interval. In one exemplary embodiment, the CMTS 120 uses DOCSIS 3.0 upstream channel bonding to communicate with the cable modem 142, a DOCSIS 3.0 bonded modem configured with the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier. Similar to the exemplary prior art system described above, the cable modem 142 uses, for example, four upstream channels in a bonding group with a ranging interval for each upstream channel of 10 seconds, for example, and sets the T4 Timeout Multiplier, for example, to 4 (i.e., the number of bonded channels). Thus, the use of the T4 Timeout Multiplier increases the ranging interval to 40 seconds (4×10 seconds). In addition, the CMTS 120 spectrum management 124 service periodically monitors the upstream channel quality by retrieving the SNR statistics 125 for one of the bonded channels at a channel quality monitoring interval, for example, of 10 seconds. When the channel quality monitoring interval is less than the bonded channel ranging interval, and the cable modem 142 is idle (“idle” meaning no ranging or data passing), the CMTS 120 can ensure that the SNR statistics 125 are accurate, and take appropriate action when the channel is impacted, by detecting an upcoming retrieval of the SNR statistics 125 and forcing a ranging message. FIG. 3 illustrates one mechanism for detecting an upcoming retrieval of the SNR statistics 125 by detecting when an SNR ranging timer fires on the CMTS 120 (step 310). The firing of the SNR ranging timer triggers the CMTS 120 to send an invite ranging message to the cable modem 142 (step 320). The CMTS 120 restarts the SNR ranging timer (step 330), and waits for the SNR measurement timer to fire (step 340). In one embodiment, the SNR measurement timer fires between 1 and 2 seconds, for example, after the SNR ranging timer. The process 300 restarts the SNR measurement timer (step 350) and retrieves the SNR measurement for the cable modem 142 (step 360). By sending the invite ranging message before the CMTS 120 retrieves the SNR statistics 125, the process 300 will ensure valid SNR statistics are available to monitor the channel quality. The process 300 will increase the ranging traffic for only the cable modem 142 used to monitor the channel, and leave all of the remaining cable modems to operate with a ranging interval, for example, of 40 seconds. An advantage of the process 300 is that it allows the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier to operate for all of the remaining modems the way it was designed to operate.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram that illustrates a method for stabilizing the upstream channel quality measurements when monitoring the upstream channel quality by averaging the upstream channel quality measurements for a channel from all the cable modems using the channel according to one embodiment. Using the same exemplary embodiment as described for FIG. 3, the process 400 shown in FIG. 4 detects an upcoming retrieval of SNR statistics 125 when the channel ranging timer fires on the CMTS 120 (step 410). The channel ranging timer triggers the CMTS 120 to send an invite ranging message to all of the cable modems 142 on this receiver (step 420). The CMTS 120 restarts the channel ranging timer (step 430), and waits for the SNR measurement timer to fire (step 440). In one embodiment, the SNR measurement timer fires between 1 and 2 seconds, for example, after the channel ranging timer. The process 400 restarts the SNR measurement timer (step 450) and retrieves the SNR measurement for the upstream channel (step 460). By sending the invite ranging messages before the CMTS 120 retrieves the SNR statistics 125, the process 400 will stabilize the SNR measurement of the channel, but it defeats the intended purpose of the T4 Timeout Multiplier (i.e., to reduce CMTS overhead associated with scheduling the messages). In another embodiment, the CMTS 120 reduces the overhead associated with scheduling the messages by only sending the ranging messages to the modems that are not passing data. In another embodiment, the CMTS 120 reduces the overhead associated with scheduling the messages by only sending the ranging messages to every other modem in a list alternating each time an SNR measurement is performed.


Although the disclosed embodiments describe a fully functioning method and computing device for maintaining the stability of the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system when the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier is in use, the reader should understand that other equivalent embodiments exist. Since numerous modifications and variations will occur to those reviewing this disclosure, the method and computing device for maintaining the stability of the upstream channel quality measurements in an upstream channel bonded system when the DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier is in use is not limited to the exact construction and operation illustrated and disclosed. Accordingly, this disclosure intends all suitable modifications and equivalents to fall within the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising: configuring a cable modem, that communicates using bonded channels, to periodically exchange ranging messages on the bonded channels, wherein a bonded channel ranging interval determines a period for the exchange;monitoring a signal quality metric for a monitored channel of the bonded channels by periodically retrieving a quality measurement for the monitored channel, a period between each retrieval determined by a channel quality monitoring interval;sending an invite ranging message to the cable modem before retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel; andretrieving the quality measurement for the monitored channel, wherein the signal quality metric for the monitored channel is based on the quality measurement;wherein the configuring of the cable modem further comprises: receiving a range request message; andsending a range response message that includes a timeout multiplier for the bonded channels,wherein the bonded channel ranging interval is a product of a channel ranging interval for the cable modem and the timeout multiplier; wherein the signal quality metric for the monitored channel is an average of the quality measurement retrieved from the cable modem and at least one other cable modem that each communicate using the monitored channel.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the bonded channels are upstream bonded channels.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the timeout multiplier is a DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal quality metric includes at least one of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and modulation error ratio (MER).
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the sending of the invite ranging message further comprises: detecting an upcoming retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel; anddetecting idle communication on the monitored channel since the previous retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the detecting of the upcoming retrieval further comprises: detecting an expiration of a ranging timer; andrestarting the ranging timer,wherein the expiration of the ranging timer triggers the sending of the invite ranging message.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the retrieving of the quality measurement further comprises: detecting an expiration of a quality measurement timer.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the bonded channel ranging interval is greater than the channel quality monitoring interval.
  • 9. A computing device, comprising: a memory device resident in the computing device; anda processor disposed in communication with the memory device, the processor configured to: configure a cable modem, that communicates using bonded channels, to periodically exchange ranging messages on the bonded channels, wherein a bonded channel ranging interval determines a period for the exchange;monitor a signal quality metric for a monitored channel of the bonded channels by periodically retrieving a quality measurement for the monitored channel, a period between each retrieval determined by a channel quality monitoring interval;send an invite ranging message to the cable modem before retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel; andretrieve the quality measurement for the monitored channel, wherein the signal quality metric for the monitored channel is based on the quality measurement;wherein to configure the cable modem, the processor is further configured to: receive a range request message; andsend a range response message that includes a timeout multiplier for the bonded channels,wherein the bonded channel ranging interval is a product of a channel ranging interval for the cable modem and the timeout multiplier; wherein the signal quality metric for the monitored channel is an average of the quality measurement retrieved from the cable modem and at least one other cable modem that each communicate using the monitored channel.
  • 10. The computing device of claim 9, wherein the bonded channels are upstream bonded channels.
  • 11. The computing device of claim 9, wherein the timeout multiplier is a DOCSIS T4 Timeout Multiplier.
  • 12. The computing device of claim 9, wherein the signal quality metric includes at least one of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and modulation error ratio (MER).
  • 13. The computing device of claim 9, wherein to send the invite ranging message, the processor is further configured to: detect an upcoming retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel; anddetect idle communication on the monitored channel since the previous retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel.
  • 14. The computing device of claim 13, wherein to detect the upcoming retrieval, the processor is further configured to: detect an expiration of a ranging timer; andrestart the ranging timer,wherein the expiration of the ranging timer triggers the sending of the invite ranging message.
  • 15. The computing device of claim 9, wherein to retrieve the quality measurement, the processor is further configured to: detect an expiration of a quality measurement timer.
  • 16. The computing device of claim 9, wherein the bonded channel ranging interval is greater than the channel quality monitoring interval.
  • 17. A non-transitory computer-readable medium, comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed on a computing device, perform steps of: configuring a cable modem, that communicates using bonded channels, to periodically exchange ranging messages on the bonded channels, wherein a bonded channel ranging interval determines a period for the exchange;monitoring a signal quality metric for a monitored channel of the bonded channels by periodically retrieving a quality measurement for the monitored channel, a period between each retrieval determined by a channel quality monitoring interval;sending an invite ranging message to the cable modem before retrieval of the quality measurement for the monitored channel; andretrieving the quality measurement for the monitored channel, wherein the signal quality metric for the monitored channel is based on the quality measurement;wherein the configuring of the cable modem further comprises: receiving a range request message; andsending a range response message that includes a timeout multiplier for the bonded channels,wherein the bonded channel ranging interval is a product of a channel ranging interval for the cable modem and the timeout multiplier; wherein the signal quality metric for the monitored channel is an average of the quality measurement retrieved from the cable modem and at least one other cable modem that each communicate using the monitored channel.
US Referenced Citations (318)
Number Name Date Kind
3838221 Schmidt et al. Sep 1974 A
4245342 Entenman Jan 1981 A
4385392 Angell et al. May 1983 A
4811360 Potter Mar 1989 A
4999787 McNally et al. Mar 1991 A
5228060 Uchiyama Jul 1993 A
5251324 McMullan Oct 1993 A
5271060 Moran et al. Dec 1993 A
5278977 Spencer et al. Jan 1994 A
5347539 Sridhar et al. Sep 1994 A
5390339 Bruckert et al. Feb 1995 A
5463661 Moran et al. Oct 1995 A
5532865 Utsumi et al. Jul 1996 A
5557603 Barlett et al. Sep 1996 A
5606725 Hart Feb 1997 A
5631846 Szurkowski May 1997 A
5692010 Nielsen Nov 1997 A
5694437 Yang et al. Dec 1997 A
5732104 Brown et al. Mar 1998 A
5790523 Ritchie et al. Aug 1998 A
5862451 Grau et al. Jan 1999 A
5867539 Koslov Feb 1999 A
5870429 Moran et al. Feb 1999 A
5886749 Williams et al. Mar 1999 A
5939887 Schmidt et al. Aug 1999 A
5943604 Chen et al. Aug 1999 A
5987061 Chen Nov 1999 A
6002722 Wu Dec 1999 A
6032019 Chen et al. Feb 2000 A
6044107 Gatherer et al. Mar 2000 A
6061393 Tsui et al. May 2000 A
6108351 Hardy et al. Aug 2000 A
6154503 Strolle Nov 2000 A
6229792 Anderson et al. May 2001 B1
6230326 Unger et al. May 2001 B1
6233274 Tsui et al. May 2001 B1
6240553 Son et al. May 2001 B1
6272150 Hrastar et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278730 Tsui et al. Aug 2001 B1
6308286 Richmond et al. Oct 2001 B1
6310909 Jones Oct 2001 B1
6321384 Eldering Nov 2001 B1
6330221 Gomez Dec 2001 B1
6334219 Hill et al. Dec 2001 B1
6377552 Moran et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385773 Schwartzman et al. May 2002 B1
6389068 Smith et al. May 2002 B1
6434583 Dapper et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445734 Chen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456597 Bare Sep 2002 B1
6459703 Grimwood et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477197 Unger Nov 2002 B1
6480469 Moore et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483033 Simoes et al. Nov 2002 B1
6498663 Farhan et al. Dec 2002 B1
6512616 Nishihara Jan 2003 B1
6526260 Hick et al. Feb 2003 B1
6546557 Ovadia Apr 2003 B1
6556239 Al Araji et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556562 Bhagavath et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556660 Li et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559756 Al Araji et al. May 2003 B2
6563868 Zhang et al. May 2003 B1
6570394 Williams May 2003 B1
6570913 Chen May 2003 B1
6574797 Naegeli et al. Jun 2003 B1
6588016 Chen et al. Jul 2003 B1
6606351 Dapper et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611795 Cooper Aug 2003 B2
6646677 Noro et al. Nov 2003 B2
6662135 Burns et al. Dec 2003 B1
6662368 Cloonan et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671334 Kuntz et al. Dec 2003 B1
6687632 Rittman Feb 2004 B1
6690655 Miner et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700875 Schroeder et al. Mar 2004 B1
6700927 Esliger et al. Mar 2004 B1
6711134 Wichelman et al. Mar 2004 B1
6741947 Wichelman et al. May 2004 B1
6748551 Furudate et al. Jun 2004 B2
6757253 Cooper et al. Jun 2004 B1
6772388 Cooper et al. Aug 2004 B2
6772437 Cooper et al. Aug 2004 B1
6775840 Naegel et al. Aug 2004 B1
6816463 Cooper et al. Nov 2004 B2
6834057 Rabenko et al. Dec 2004 B1
6839829 Daruwalla et al. Jan 2005 B1
6853932 Wichelman et al. Feb 2005 B1
6877166 Roeck et al. Apr 2005 B1
6895043 Naegeli et al. May 2005 B1
6895594 Simoes et al. May 2005 B1
6906526 Hart et al. Jun 2005 B2
6928475 Schenkel et al. Aug 2005 B2
6944881 Vogel Sep 2005 B1
6961314 Quigley et al. Nov 2005 B1
6961370 Chappell Nov 2005 B2
6967994 Boer et al. Nov 2005 B2
6973141 Isaksen et al. Dec 2005 B1
6985437 Vogel Jan 2006 B1
6987754 Shahar et al. Jan 2006 B2
6999408 Gomez Feb 2006 B1
7002899 Azenkot et al. Feb 2006 B2
7010002 Chow et al. Mar 2006 B2
7017176 Lee et al. Mar 2006 B1
7032159 Lusky et al. Apr 2006 B2
7039939 Millet et al. May 2006 B1
7050419 Azenkot et al. May 2006 B2
7054554 McNamara et al. May 2006 B1
7058007 Daruwalla et al. Jun 2006 B1
7072365 Ansley Jul 2006 B1
7079457 Wakabayashi et al. Jul 2006 B2
7099412 Coffey Aug 2006 B2
7099580 Bulbul Aug 2006 B1
7139283 Quigley et al. Nov 2006 B2
7142609 Terreault et al. Nov 2006 B2
7145887 Akgun et al. Dec 2006 B1
7152025 Lusky et al. Dec 2006 B2
7158542 Zeng et al. Jan 2007 B1
7164694 Nodoushani et al. Jan 2007 B1
7177324 Choudhury et al. Feb 2007 B1
7197067 Lusky et al. Mar 2007 B2
7222255 Claessens et al. May 2007 B1
7227863 Leung et al. Jun 2007 B1
7242862 Saunders et al. Jul 2007 B2
7246368 Millet et al. Jul 2007 B1
7263123 Yousef Aug 2007 B2
7274735 Lusky et al. Sep 2007 B2
7295518 Monk et al. Nov 2007 B1
7315573 Lusky et al. Jan 2008 B2
7315967 Azenko et al. Jan 2008 B2
7400677 Jones Jul 2008 B2
7421276 Steer et al. Sep 2008 B2
7451472 Williams Nov 2008 B2
7492703 Lusky et al. Feb 2009 B2
7554902 Kim et al. Jun 2009 B2
7573884 Klimker et al. Aug 2009 B2
7573935 Min et al. Aug 2009 B2
7584298 Klinker et al. Sep 2009 B2
7616654 Moran et al. Nov 2009 B2
7650112 Utsumi et al. Jan 2010 B2
7672310 Cooper et al. Mar 2010 B2
7684315 Beser Mar 2010 B1
7684341 Howald Mar 2010 B2
7693090 Kimpe Apr 2010 B1
7701938 Bernstein et al. Apr 2010 B1
7716712 Booth et al. May 2010 B2
7739359 Millet et al. Jun 2010 B1
7742697 Cooper et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742771 Thibeault Jun 2010 B2
7760624 Goodson et al. Jul 2010 B1
7778314 Wajcer et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787557 Kim et al. Aug 2010 B2
7792183 Massey et al. Sep 2010 B2
7826569 Popper et al. Nov 2010 B2
7856049 Currivan et al. Dec 2010 B2
7876697 Thompson et al. Jan 2011 B2
7953144 Allen et al. May 2011 B2
7958534 Beser Jun 2011 B1
7970010 Denney et al. Jun 2011 B2
7983162 Ford et al. Jul 2011 B1
8000254 Thompson et al. Aug 2011 B2
8037541 Montague et al. Oct 2011 B2
8040915 Cummings Oct 2011 B2
8059546 Pai et al. Nov 2011 B2
8081674 Thompson et al. Dec 2011 B2
8116360 Thibeault Feb 2012 B2
8265559 Cooper et al. Sep 2012 B2
8284828 Cooper et al. Oct 2012 B2
8345557 Thibeault et al. Jan 2013 B2
20010055319 Quigley et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020038461 White et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020044531 Cooper et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020091970 Furudate et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020116493 Schenkel et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020119783 Bourlas et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020154620 Azenkot et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020168131 Walter et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020181395 Foster et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030028898 Howald Feb 2003 A1
20030043732 Walton et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030067883 Azenkot et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030067944 Sala et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030101463 Greene et al. May 2003 A1
20030108052 Inoue et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120819 Abramson et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030138250 Glynn Jul 2003 A1
20030149991 Reidhead et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030158940 Leigh Aug 2003 A1
20030179768 Lusky et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030179770 Reznic et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030179821 Lusky et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030181185 Lusky et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182664 Lusky et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185176 Lusky et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030188254 Lusky et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200317 Zeitak et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212999 Cai Nov 2003 A1
20040015765 Cooper et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040042385 Kim et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040047284 Eidson Mar 2004 A1
20040052248 Frank et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040052356 McKinzie et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040062548 Obeda et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073937 Williams Apr 2004 A1
20040096216 Ito May 2004 A1
20040109661 Bierman et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040139473 Greene Jul 2004 A1
20040163129 Chapman et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040181811 Rakib Sep 2004 A1
20040208513 Peddanarappagari et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040233234 Chaudhry et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040233926 Cummings Nov 2004 A1
20040248520 Miyoshi Dec 2004 A1
20040261119 Williams et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050010958 Rakib et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050025145 Rakib et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050034159 Ophir et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050039103 Azenko et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050058082 Moran et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050064890 Johan et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050097617 Currivan et al. May 2005 A1
20050108763 Baran et al. May 2005 A1
20050122996 Azenkot et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050163088 Yamano et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050175080 Bouillett Aug 2005 A1
20050183130 Sadja et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198688 Fong Sep 2005 A1
20050226161 Jaworski Oct 2005 A1
20050281200 Terreault Dec 2005 A1
20060013147 Terpstra et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060088056 Quigley et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060121946 Walton et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060250967 Miller et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060262722 Chapman et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070002752 Thibeault et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070030805 Pantelias et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070058542 Thibeault Mar 2007 A1
20070076592 Thibeault Apr 2007 A1
20070076789 Thibeault Apr 2007 A1
20070076790 Thibeault et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070086328 Kao et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070094691 Gazdzinski Apr 2007 A1
20070097907 Cummings May 2007 A1
20070121712 Okamoto May 2007 A1
20070133672 Lee et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070143654 Joyce et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070147489 Sun et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070177526 Siripunkaw et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070184835 Bitran et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189770 Sucharczuk et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201547 Willcocks et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070206600 Klimker et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070206625 Maeda Sep 2007 A1
20070211618 Cooper et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070223512 Cooper et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070223513 Pantelias et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070223920 Moore et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070245177 Cooper et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080056713 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062888 Lusky et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065960 Cheng et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080069006 Walter et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080075157 Allen et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080101210 Thompson et al. May 2008 A1
20080125984 Skendzic et al. May 2008 A1
20080140823 Thompson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080193137 Thompson et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080200129 Cooper et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080242339 Anderson Oct 2008 A1
20080250508 Montague et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080274700 Li Nov 2008 A1
20080291840 Cooper et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090031384 Brooks et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090103557 Hong et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090103669 Kolze et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090109877 Murray et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090135754 Yavuz et al. May 2009 A1
20090249421 Liu et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090252234 Samdani et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100083356 Steckley et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100095360 Pavlovski et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100128739 Jung et al. May 2010 A1
20100154016 Li et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100154017 An et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100157824 Thompson et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100158093 Thompson et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100185391 Lee et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100223650 Millet et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251320 Shafer et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110026577 Primo et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110030019 Ulm et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110069745 Thompson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110072127 Gerber et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110110415 Cooper et al. May 2011 A1
20110150058 Oh Jun 2011 A1
20110153683 Hoskinson Jun 2011 A1
20110194418 Wolcott et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110194597 Wolcott et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110197071 Wolcott et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110243214 Wolcott et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120027069 Clausen et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120054312 Salinger Mar 2012 A1
20120084416 Thibeault et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120093240 McFarland et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120147751 Ulm Jun 2012 A1
20130041990 Thibeault et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130051442 Cooper et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130128723 Thibeault et al. May 2013 A1
20130148707 Thibeault et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130286852 Bowler et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130290783 Bowler et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130290791 Basile et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130291034 Basile et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130294489 Thibeault et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140029654 Thompson et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140029655 Thompson et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140133533 Thibeault et al. May 2014 A1
20140185428 Thibeault et al. Jul 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
69631420 Dec 2004 DE
1235402 Aug 2002 EP
1341335 Sep 2003 EP
55132161 Oct 1980 JP
04208707 Jul 1992 JP
6120896 Apr 1994 JP
6177840 Jun 1994 JP
09008738 Jan 1997 JP
9162816 Jun 1997 JP
10247893 Sep 1998 JP
11230857 Aug 1999 JP
2001044956 Feb 2001 JP
2003530761 Oct 2003 JP
2004172783 Jun 2004 JP
2004343678 Dec 2004 JP
0192901 Jun 2001 WO
0233974 Apr 2002 WO
2004062124 Jul 2004 WO
2009146426 Dec 2009 WO
2011097646 Aug 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (42)
Entry
Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications DOCSIS® 3.0—MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface Specification, Nov. 17, 2011 (770 pages).
PCT Search Report & Written Opinion, Re: Application #PCT/US2013/038718, Oct. 8, 2013.
“Access, Terminals, Transmission and Mutliplexing (ATTM); Third Generation Transmission Systems for Interactive Cable Television Services—IP Cable Modems; Part 4: MAC and Upper Layer Protocols; DOCSIS 3.0”, European Standard, European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), vol. ATTM AT3, No. V1.1.1., Nov. 1, 2011, pp. 100-111.
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Configuring Load Balancing and Dynamic Channel Change (DCC) on the Cisco CMTS”, URL: www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/cable/cmts/troubleshooting—batch9/cmtslbg.pdf (dated Jan. 2009).
B. Volpe, “DOCSIS 3.0 Partial Service”, The Volpe Firm, URL: volpefirm.com/docsis-3-0-partial-service (blog posting dated Jul. 12, 2011).
B. Volpe, “DOCSIS 3.0 Tutorial—Upstream Channel Bonding”, The Volpe Firm, URL: volpefirm.com/upstream-channel-bonding (blog posting dated Aug. 22, 2010).
B. Volpe, et al., “Cable-Tec Expo 2011: Advanced Troubleshooting in a DOCSIS 3.0 Plant”, The Volpe Firm, URL: http://bradyvolpe.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/VM—Expo2011—v1-blog.pdf (dated Nov. 2011).
Cisco Systems, Inc. “Upstream Channel Bonding”, URL: www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/cable/configuration/guide/ubr—uscb.pdf (dated Nov. 2009 and last updated Jul. 2012).
“A Simple Algorithm for Fault Localization Using Naming Convention and Micro-reflection Signature,” Invention Disclosure 60193, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Jun. 2008, p. 2.
“Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications DOCSIS 3.0: MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface,” CM-SP-MULPIv3.0-116-110623, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Jun. 2011, section 8, pp. 242-266.
“DOCSIS Best Practices and Guidelines; Proactive Network Maintenance Using Pre-Equalization,” CM-GL-PNMP-V01-100415, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., pp. 123.
“Pre-Equalization Based Pro-active Network Maintenance Process Model for CMs Transmitting on Multiple Upstream Channels,” Invention Disclosure 60203, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., May 2009, pp. 2.
“Pre-Equalization based pro-active network maintenance process model,” Invention Disclosure 60177, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Jun. 2008, pp. 2.
“Proactive Network Maintenance Using Pre-Equalization,” DOCSIS Best Practices and Guidelines, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., CM-GL-PNMP-V02-110623, Jun. 23, 2011, pp. 133.
“Radio Frequency Interface Specification,” Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications DOCSIS 2.0, CM-SP-RFIv2.0-I06-040804, pp. 524.
Campos, L. A., et al., “Pre-equalization based Pro-active Network Maintenance Methodology,” Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., (presentation), 2012, pp. 32.
Howald, R. L., et al., “Customized Broadband—Analysis Techniques for Blended Multiplexes,” pp. 12.
Howald, R., “Access Networks Solutions: Introduction to S-CDMA,” Presentation to Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) South Florida Chapter, Motorola, Inc., 2009, pp. 15.
Howald, R., “Upstream Snapshots & Indicators (2009),” Regional Samples, Presentation to Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) South Florida Chapter, Jan. 2010, pp. 22.
Howald, R., et al., “Characterizing and Aligning the HFC Return Path for Successful DOCSIS 3.0 Rollouts,” Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) Cable Tee Expo, Oct. 2009, pp. 66.
Howald, R., et al., “Docsis 3.0 Upstream: Readiness & Qualification,” pp. 17.
Howald, R., et al., “The Grown-Up Potential of a Teenage Phy,” pp. 65.
Howald, R.,“DOCSIS 3.0 Upstream: Technology, RF Variables & Case Studies,” Access Networks Solutions, 2009, presentation to Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) South Florida Chapter, Jan. 2010, pp. 23.
Hranac, R., “Linear Distortions, Part 1,” Communication Technology, Jul. 1, 2005, accessed at www.cable360.net/print/ct/operations/testing/15131.html, pp. 6.
Liu, X., and Bernstein, A., “Variable Bit Rate Video Services in DOCSIS 3.0 Networks,” NCTA Technical Papers, 2008, pp. 12.
Motorola., “White Paper: Expanding Bandwidth Using Advanced Spectrum Management,” Sep. 25, 2003, pp. 12.
Newton's Telecom Dictionary, Sep. 1995, Flatiron Publishing, 9th Edition, pp. 216 and 1023, definitions of “carrier to noise ratio” and “signal to noise ratio”.
Patrick, M., and Joyce, G., “Delivering Economical IP Video over DOCSIS by Bypassing the M-CMTS with DIBA,” SCTE 2007 Emerging Technologies, Topic Subject: Service Velocity & Next Generation Architectures: How Do We Get There?, 2007, pp. 17.
Popper, A., et al, “An Advanced Receiver with Interference Cancellation for Broadband Cable Networks,” Juniper Networks, International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications Access 2002, pp. 23-1-23-6.
Popper, A., et al, “Ingress Noise Cancellation for the Upstream Channel in Broadband Cable Access Systems,” Juniper Networks, IEEE International Conference on Communications 2002, vol. 3, pp. 1808-1812.
Qureshi, S. U. H., “Adaptive Equalization,” IEEE, vol. 73, No. 9, Sep. 1985, pp. 1349-1387.
Ramakrishnan, S., “Scaling the DOCSIS Network for IPTV,” Cisco Systems, Inc., SCTE Conference on Emerging Technologies and the NCTA Cable Show, 2009, pp. 19.
Shelke, Y. R., “Knowledge Based Topology Discovery and Geo-localization,” Thesis, 2010, pp. 173.
Thompson, R., et al., “256-QAM for Upstream HFC,” Spring Technical Forum Proceedings, 2010, pp. 142-152.
Thompson, R., et al., “256-QAM for Upstream HFD Part Two,” SCTE Cable Tec Expo 2011, Technical Paper, pp. 22.
Thompson, R., et al., “Multiple Access Made Easy,” SCTE Cable Tec Expo 2011, Technical Paper, pp. 23.
Thompson, R., et al., “Optimizing Upstream Throughput Using Equalization Coefficient Analysis,” National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) Technical Papers, Apr. 2009, pp. 35.
Thompson, R., et al., “Practical Considerations for Migrating the Network Toward All-Digital,” Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) Cable-Tec Expo, Oct. 2009, pp. 22.
Thompson, R., et al., “64-QAM, 6.4MHz Upstream Deployment Challenges,” SCTE Canadian Summit, Toronto, Canada, Technical Paper, Mar. 2011, pp. 25.
Volpe, B., and Miller, W., “Cable-Tec Expo 2011: Advanced Troubleshooting in a DOCSIS © 3.0 Plant,” Nov. 14-17, 2011, pp. 17.
Wolcott, L., “Modem Signal Usage and Fault Isolation,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/301,835, filed Feb. 5, 2010.
Zhao, F., et al., “Techniques for minimizing error propagation in decision feedback detectors for recording channels,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 12.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130294489 A1 Nov 2013 US