With the advent of mass market digital communications and content distribution, many access networks such as wireless networks, cable networks and DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) networks are pressed for user capacity, with, for example, EVDO (Evolution-Data Optimized), HSPA (High Speed Packet Access), LTE (Long Term Evolution), WiMax (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access), and Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity) wireless networks increasingly becoming user capacity constrained. Although wireless network capacity will increase with new higher capacity wireless radio access technologies, such as MIMO (Multiple-Input Multiple-Output), and with more frequency spectrum being deployed in the future, these capacity gains are likely to be less than what is required to meet growing digital networking demand.
Similarly, although wire line access networks, such as cable and DSL, can have higher average capacity per user, wire line user service consumption habits are trending toward very high bandwidth applications that can quickly consume the available capacity and degrade overall network service experience. Because some components of service provider costs go up with increasing bandwidth, this trend will also negatively impact service provider profits.
Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process; an apparatus; a system; a composition of matter; a computer program product embodied on a computer readable storage medium; and/or a processor, such as a processor configured to execute instructions stored on and/or provided by a memory coupled to the processor. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention. Unless stated otherwise, a component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task may be implemented as a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task. As used herein, the term ‘processor’ refers to one or more devices, circuits, and/or processing cores configured to process data, such as computer program instructions.
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
Some enterprises only allow certain specialized wireless devices to be used for connection to their enterprise network. Such devices typically contain secure data storage and enterprise program execution environments to protect enterprise information and network access. This approach is generally directed towards maintaining enterprise data integrity and enterprise network security. However, this approach does not address the various problems associated with allocating service usage or billing between consumer or non-enterprise service usage activities and enterprise service usage activities.
Accordingly, there is a need to provide for an enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities. There is also a need to address various issues with enterprise policies that can vary from employee to employee. For example, roaming policies can be configured differently for a global sales person than for a finance administrator who does not travel as much on enterprise business. Furthermore, some enterprises may not elect to pay for employee wireless communication device purchase or all employee wireless communication service usage needs or desires. As a result, some enterprises would benefit from techniques that allowed such enterprises to piggy back on consumer device or service purchases while maintaining an enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities.
Also, some consumers prefer to select their own wireless communication device that may not be an enterprise approved wireless communication device or a specialized enterprise device specified by enterprise IT managers. For example, certain enterprises may only offer certain Blackberry smart phone devices, and certain employees may prefer Apple iPhone and/or various Android based smart phone devices. Another trend suggests that a growing number of enterprise employees desire to use a single wireless communication device for their enterprise mobile communication, enterprise information access, and enterprise network access as well as for, for example, their personal mobile communication, access, and application needs (e.g., consumer/personal, that is, non-enterprise, use of cellular calls, text messaging, web browsing, social networking, games, and various other service usage activities). Such dual persona devices, where a first persona is oriented to enterprise access and/or application needs and a second persona is oriented to personal access and/or application needs, are enabled by the disclosure herein.
As a result, enterprise network managers generally need a way to safely allow consumers to perform consumer mobile access services that the enterprise can specify that will not be paid for by the enterprise. Various network architectures and techniques are described herein that allow an enterprise to determine how much service usage (e.g., how much of a corresponding service bill) should be allocated to device user services or consumer services and how much should be allocated to enterprise services in which the enterprise sponsors the enterprise access. Various design approaches and techniques are described herein for allocating enterprise and consumer billing in a secure manner that works with both specialized enterprise wireless communication devices as well as other wireless communication devices. For example, crediting a user bill with sponsored enterprise service usage is provided using various techniques described herein. As another example, providing enterprise employee reimbursement for enterprise services used on the employee wireless communication device or allowing an enterprise to deduct employee consumer service usage from their paycheck is provided using various techniques described herein. As yet another example, allowing a consumer to select from an instant activation platform on a wireless communication device that comes pre-loaded with various enterprise services is provided using various techniques described herein. As yet a further example, providing for a capability to install or download an enterprise application that provides secure enterprise mobile services access and allocating enterprise and consumer billing for consumer wireless communication devices is provided using various techniques described herein.
Various techniques for monitoring service usage and providing for secured and verifiable device assisted services (DAS), including DAS based service usage monitoring, are disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/380,758entitled VERIFIABLE DEVICE ASSISTED SERVICE USAGE MONITORING WITH REPORTING, SYNCHRONIZATION, AND NOTIFICATION, filed on Mar. 2, 2009, published as U.S. Pub. App. No. 20100191612, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/695,019, entitled DEVICE ASSISTED CDR CREATION, AGGREGATION, MEDIATION and BILLING, filed on Jan. 27, 2010, published as U.S. Pub. App. No. 20100197266, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/695,020, entitled ADAPTIVE AMBIENT SERVICES, filed on Jan. 27, 2010, published as U.S. Pub. App. No. 20100198698, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/694,445, entitled SECURITY TECHNIQUES FOR DEVICE ASSISTED SERVICES, filed on Jan. 27, 2010, published as U.S. Pub. App. No. 20100199325, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/694,451, entitled DEVICE GROUP PARTITIONS AND SETTLEMENT PLATFORM, filed on Jan. 27, 2010, published as U.S. Pub. App. No. 20100197267, which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
In some embodiments, allocating enterprise and consumer billing for service usage activities on a wireless communication device is provided for service usage activities that an enterprise configures as approved and/or sponsored for enterprise billing (e.g., such service usage activities are paid for at least in part by the enterprise) and consumer applications and service usage activities that the device user chooses to use from the wireless communication device and that the enterprise does not sponsor. Various embodiments are disclosed herein describing a wide range of devices that users and enterprises may desire to use for such dual-purpose application scenarios. In some embodiments, devices for such applications can include a less specialized and secure device program execution environment as further described herein.
Accordingly, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities is provided. In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes monitoring a service usage activity of a wireless communication device (e.g., the monitoring can be performed in the wireless communication device and/or the monitoring of enterprise application service usage can be performed using a secure application server in the enterprise network), and determining an enterprise and consumer billing allocation for the monitored service usage activity. In some embodiments the allocation is determined by classifying the service usage activities as associated with a consumer service usage activity (e.g., in a consumer service usage activity list) or associated with an enterprise service usage activity (e.g., in an enterprise service usage activity list; or, as another example, if the monitored service usage activity is not included in the enterprise service usage activity list, then it can be automatically classified as a consumer service usage activity by default).
In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes providing a service design center (SDC) for configuring an enterprise and consumer billing allocation of monitored service usage activities for a plurality of wireless communication devices associated with an enterprise account, and implementing the configured enterprise and consumer billing allocation for monitored service usage activities for the plurality of wireless communication devices associated with the enterprise account.
In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes monitoring service usage of a wireless communication device, and determining whether a user is acting as a consumer (e.g., personal service usage activities on the wireless communication device) or a professional (e.g., enterprise service usage activities on the wireless communication device, that is, the user is working on the wireless communication device in his or her capacity as an employee for an enterprise, in which the wireless communication device is associated with an enterprise account for the enterprise) based on the monitored service usage activity (e.g., based on place, time of day, application or service activity, and/or other criteria or factors). In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities differentially charges and/or allocates billing between the enterprise and the consumer based on a classification of the monitored service usage activity as allocated to the enterprise or to the consumer for billing/charging purposes. Such embodiments enable a dual persona device user experience.
In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes monitoring a service usage activity of a wireless communication device, and reporting the monitored service usage activity to a network element (e.g., a service controller, a service usage reconciliation function, another service control or billing/charging function in the network, or another network element), in which the network element determines an enterprise and consumer billing allocation for the monitored service usage activity. In some embodiments, the network element (e.g., a service controller, a service usage reconciliation function, another service control or billing/charging function in the network, or another network element) determines an enterprise and consumer billing allocation for the monitored service usage activity. In some embodiments, a service usage reconciliation function determines how much service usage is due to enterprise service usage activities and how much is due to consumer service usage activities. In some embodiments, after determining the allocation between consumer and enterprise service usage activities, the service usage reconciliation function provides the information to a service usage accounting function (e.g., a carrier billing server or an enterprise service usage accounting server), which in turn delivers a consumer usage report or bill and/or an enterprise usage report or bill. In some embodiments, the service usage reconciliation function determines the amount of enterprise service usage and creates a service usage credit record so that a device user's account can be credited or a device user can be compensated or reimbursed for enterprise service usage costs. In some embodiments, a service usage monitor is configured to monitor service usage activities of a device. In some embodiments, the service usage monitor is configured to classify the monitored service usage activities as enterprise service usage activities. In some embodiments, the service usage monitor is configured to classify the monitored service usage activities as consumer service usage activities. In some embodiments, the service usage monitor is configured to monitor a first group of service usage activities for service usage allocation to a device user (e.g., using a list of service usage activities associated with a consumer service usage), and a second group of service usage activities for service usage allocation to an enterprise (e.g., using a list of service usage activities associated with an enterprise service usage). In some embodiments, service usage activities (e.g., service activities, such as applications, network, and/or voice based activities that use wireless network service usage resources) are classified using various techniques described herein, such as based on application (e.g., application credential), device (e.g., device credential), time of day, network destination, network traffic protocol and/or port, and various other criteria/factors. In some embodiments, the service usage monitor is implemented in the network (e.g., on one or more network elements in the carrier network and/or enterprise network, as described herein). In some embodiments, the service usage monitor is implemented in the device (e.g., using various techniques described herein, including verifiable and/or secured device-based implementations). In some embodiments, the service usage monitor is implemented using both network-based and device-based techniques, as described herein with respect to various embodiments.
In some embodiments, a set of service activities that will be sponsored by an enterprise (e.g., a specified or configured list of enterprise sponsored service activities) is managed by an enterprise service design center. In some embodiments, a list of service activities and the associated service policies for each service activity are compiled to form an enterprise sponsored service activity policy set. For example, enterprise email, enterprise calendar, and enterprise contacts can be configured as sponsored service activities. In some embodiments, the sponsored enterprise services list includes a list of network destinations that are associated with the services (e.g., an enterprise mail server address and/or an enterprise internal corporate network). For example, the enterprise email can be a sponsored service that is associated with an enterprise sponsored email service policy, which can limit destinations for corporate email, sizes of emails and/or email attachments, and/or other email related usage criteria or factors (e.g., a service usage charging policy).
In some embodiments, the monitored service usage is reported to the reconciliation function by a carrier network service usage monitoring element (e.g., a home agent (HA), access network gateway, or other network element, such as a deep packet inspection (DPI) function). In some embodiments, the monitored service usage is reported to the reconciliation function by an enterprise network service usage monitoring element (e.g., a carrier network gateway or a mobile services gateway/server or other element in the enterprise network that can measure service usage and associate it with a given device credential or application credential). In some embodiments, the monitored service usage is reported to the reconciliation function by an element in the mobile device (e.g., a service usage monitor in a secure enterprise mobile services application or a Service Processor function, which can be securely implemented and/or verified using various techniques described herein).
In some embodiments, a service design center for implementing enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities is provided. For example, an enterprise manager can use the service design center to select one or more services that the enterprise agrees to pay for/is responsible for paying for and to select one or more other services that the employees of the enterprise must agree to pay for/are responsible for paying for (e.g., if the employee elects to use/have such services that are not charged to the enterprise, or included as enterprise services that are charged to or paid for by the enterprise).
In some embodiments, a service design center that facilitates configuration of sponsored enterprise services for implementing enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities is provided. In some embodiments, a service design center for implementing enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes providing a service design center for a carrier network and another service design center for an enterprise network (e.g., in some cases, these service design centers can be combined).
In some embodiments, an enterprise sponsored service activity policy set is created by an enterprise network administrator through an enterprise service design center user interface (UI). In some embodiments, the enterprise sponsored service activity policy set includes a list of network destination addresses that corresponds to the desired sponsored service activity list, along with an access policy or service usage charging policy for the service activities. In some embodiments, all service activities in the enterprise sponsored service activity policy set receive the same access policies or charging policies. In some embodiments, a first subset of one or more of the service activities in the enterprise sponsored service activity policy set receive access policies or charging policies that are different than that of a second subset of service activities. For example, a sponsored enterprise email service can be in the first subset, and sponsored mobile voice services can be in the second subset, as certain employees (e.g., traveling sales personnel and/or executives) can be granted international and/or roaming mobile voice services, and other employees can be granted more limited sponsored mobile voice services.
In some embodiments, the enterprise network administrator uses the enterprise service design center to create an enterprise sponsored service device group list that includes device credentials or device application credentials that the carrier network and/or the enterprise network can use to identify a device or an application on a device as belonging to the group of devices for which the enterprise desires to sponsor enterprise service activities. In some embodiments, a sponsored service activity policy set is created by an enterprise network administrator through an enterprise service design center UI, and an enterprise sponsored service device group list is created by an enterprise network administrator through an enterprise service design center UI, and the two lists are stored in the enterprise service design center in which they are associated with one another for the purpose of provisioning the carrier network, the enterprise network, and/or the devices to provide the desired enterprise sponsored services policy set to the enterprise sponsored services device group, as described herein with respect to various embodiments.
In some embodiments, the association between an enterprise sponsored services device group and an enterprise sponsored service policy set is used by a service design center to create a provisioning table, in which the provisioning table is a list of the provisioning programming required for the various carrier network elements, enterprise network elements, and/or device elements to implement the desired sponsored service activity policy set for the enterprise sponsored services device group.
For example, an enterprise can use the service design center to configure certain destinations/services as enterprise services or potentially enterprise services based on various factors (e.g., corporate sites, corporate email/email servers, corporate web pages/intranet, and can, for example, agree to pay for a certain level of general web browsing by usage/time of day and/or other factors, corporate contacts/calendars, corporate videoconferencing; and certain applications, such as web conferencing applications or other applications; certain telephone service usages, etc.). As another example, the service design center can present a configuration interface that allows users to select from one or more service plans that include various consumer and enterprise allocations and/or to select an enterprise only service plan.
In some embodiments, the service design center specifies one or more service plans the device user can select from and these service plan selection options are configured into a configuration interface on a device software application that allows users to select from one or more service plans that includes various consumer and enterprise allocations and/or to select an enterprise only service plan. In some embodiments, the configuration interface is made available directly on the device via a device client that provides a service plan selection user interface that displays one or more service plan options configured in the service design center or the enterprise service design center. In some embodiments, the configuration interface is presented directly on a device user interface (UI) when the user attempts to use an access service usage activity that requires a service plan to be activated or purchased. In some embodiments, the configuration interface presented via the device UI accepts a user response, transmits it to a carrier network element responsible for provisioning a new user service plan that in turn activates the service plan chosen by the user, possibly after confirming service payment credit for the user or enterprise entity. In some embodiments, the carrier network element responsible for provisioning a new user service plan is a carrier usage accounting server. In some embodiments, the carrier network element responsible for provisioning a new user service plan is a consumer internet services element. In some embodiments, the carrier network element responsible for provisioning a new user service plan is a carrier gateway or home agent. In some embodiments the carrier network element responsible for provisioning a new user service plan is a billing system or service plan provisioning system. In some embodiments, the configuration interface is made available to the user in the form of a web site that provides a service plan selection user interface that displays one or more service plan options configured in the service design center or the enterprise service design center.
In some embodiments, the initial configuration of the end-user device includes one or more enterprise access service plans that allow the user to access certain applications or network destinations associated with enterprise access services, and the user can choose from one or more additional consumer oriented service plans offered directly on the device UI by a device software application in communication with a carrier network element responsible for provisioning a new user service plan that in turn activates the service plan chosen by the user, possibly after confirming service payment credit for the user or enterprise entity. In some embodiments, these access service plan options are configured with a service design center. In some embodiments, these access service plan options are configured with an enterprise service design center.
In some embodiments, enterprise data locally stored on the wireless communication device is secured and access to an enterprise network from the wireless communication device is secured so that only authorized devices or applications can access the network. In some embodiments, security for enterprise data and network access is accomplished by connecting the wireless communication device to the enterprise network via a secure mobile services application on the wireless communication device that connects via a secure channel to a secure mobile services gateway server in the enterprise network. In some embodiments, the SDC is programmed to provision the network and/or device apparatus to detect service usage communication with the mobile services gateway server and record that as a usage charge for network services. In some embodiments, such service usage communication with the mobile services gateway server is credited to the user's carrier account or used as a reimbursement to the user bill.
In some embodiments, determining the enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities is performed using a classifier implemented on the wireless communication device that classifies the monitored service usage activity (e.g., service usage can also be measured by the classifier and/or another function implemented on the wireless communication device, which can similarly be implemented in a secure execution area or in a secure memory), in which the classifier is executed in a secure execution area or a secure memory of the wireless communication device. In some embodiments, the security of the classifier is verified, periodically or at other times, using various techniques, such as by comparing a local service usage measure with a network based service usage measure and/or comparing a secured local service usage measure with another local service usage measure. In some embodiments, a secured application protects one or more enterprise applications (e.g., email, calendar, contacts, intranet access, and/or other enterprise specified applications, such as applications configured as approved or authorized enterprise applications for a particular enterprise by an enterprise manager using a service design center) from unauthorized use or tampering.
In some embodiments, the secure mobile services application also provides for usage monitoring of the enterprise service usage of the device. In some embodiments, the secure mobile services application also provides for service access control for the enterprise services of the device so that enterprise network access policies can be locally enforced on the device.
In some embodiments, security for enterprise data and network access is provided by connecting to the enterprise network via a secure mobile services application executed securely (e.g., in a virtual machine or in a hardware secured execution partition) on the wireless communications device that connects via a secure channel to a secure mobile services gateway server in the enterprise network. In some embodiments, security for enterprise data and network access is provided by connecting to the enterprise network via a secure mobile services application executed on a wireless communications device that includes a service processor, as described herein, that connects via a secure channel to a secure mobile services gateway server in the enterprise network. In some embodiments, the SDC is programmed to provision the network and/or wireless communications device apparatus to detect service usage communication with the mobile services gateway server, and record that as a usage charge for network services. In some embodiments, such service usage communication with the mobile services gateway server is credited to the user's carrier account or used as a reimbursement to the user bill.
In some embodiments, the service processor also provides for service usage monitoring of the enterprise service usage of the device, as described herein with respect to various embodiments. In some embodiments, the service processor also provides for service access control for the enterprise services of the device so that enterprise network access policies can be enforced on the device, as described herein with respect to various embodiments.
In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes associating the wireless communication device and/or an authorized user of the wireless communication device (e.g., using device/user credentials) with an enterprise account (and, in some embodiments, a consumer account), associating an application with a service, and associating the service with the enterprise account (e.g., a service for the wireless communication device that the enterprise agreed to pay for). In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities further includes using application-based monitoring and/or control using, for example, device assisted services.
In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes crediting an associated consumer account for service usage allocated to an enterprise account. In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes billing the enterprise for service usage allocated to the enterprise account. In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes reporting to the enterprise (and, in some embodiments, the consumer) service usage allocated to the enterprise account, and the enterprise can, for example, provide an expense reimbursement to the consumer (e.g., employee, partner, associate, or contractor of the enterprise).
In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes associating the wireless communication device with an enterprise account and a consumer account, associating an application with a service, and associating the service with the consumer account (e.g., a service for the wireless communication device that the consumer, such as an employee of the enterprise, agreed to personally pay for). In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities further includes using application-based monitoring and/or control using, for example, device assisted services.
In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes crediting an associated enterprise account for service usage allocated to a consumer account. In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes billing the consumer for service usage allocated to the consumer account. In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes reporting to the enterprise (and, in some embodiments, the consumer) service usage allocated to the consumer account, and the enterprise can, for example, deduct the cost for such service usage as an expense from the consumer's periodic/next paycheck.
In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities does not require a network element or a device element to control services. For example, a user with a device associated with a bulk service usage plan can be automatically credited for sponsored enterprise service usage. If the bulk service usage plan has a service plan cap associated with the user's consumer service plan, then the service usage classified as sponsored enterprise service usage can be deducted from the total service usage such that the sponsored enterprise service usage does not count towards the user's capped consumer service plan usage. As another example, an enterprise account associated with the wireless communication device and/or user can allow the user to exceed a monthly or other service plan cap for sponsored enterprise service usage (e.g., based on various criteria and/or other factors, such as a more restrictive enterprise service policy to avoid potential misuse of sponsored enterprise services for personal use).
In some embodiments, enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities is provided using network-based and/or device-based techniques as described herein with respect to various embodiments. For example, using various techniques described herein, an enterprise manager can control the services for wireless communication devices for the enterprise, including access to such services and/or charging for such services (e.g., services used by employees in which some are charged to the enterprise on behalf of the employee and some are charged to the employee as a consumer of such services) and user notification messages. For example, the enterprise manager or another network element/function can cap and/or control service usage for consumer services and/or enterprise services.
In some embodiments, a service usage reconciliation function is provided. In some embodiments, the service usage reconciliation function implements the rules for a billing split for the enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities, as described herein with respect to various embodiments. In some embodiments, the service usage reconciliation function also facilitates fraud detection, as described herein with respect to various embodiments.
Carrier Managed Billing Allocation with Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Network
In some embodiments, device 110 accesses various network-based voice services, such as consumer voice services 167 and/or enterprise sponsored/paid-for consumer voice services usage, via voice network 165. As shown, voice network 165 is in communication with carrier access network 150 via carrier gateway/home agent (HA) 152. In some embodiments, device 110 accesses various Internet based services, such as consumer Internet services 162 and/or enterprise sponsored/paid-for consumer Internet services usage, via Internet 160.
As also shown in
In some embodiments, carrier usage accounting server 154 (e.g., the carrier billing server) communicates (e.g., using secure communication techniques) with service usage reconciliation server function 158 to obtain reconciled service charging reports (e.g., reconciled billing reports) and/or enterprise service usage charging credit reports. In some embodiments, the reconciled service charging reports (e.g., reconciled billing reports) and/or enterprise service usage charging credit reports are processed by carrier usage accounting server 154 and reported as user usage record(s) 155 and/or enterprise usage record(s) 156. For example, mediating such charging and credit reports can be based on various factors as described herein (e.g., by application, time of day/day of week, and/or other factors). For example, the service usage charges that occur due to communication with the servers or services that are part of enterprise network 170, including secure enterprise mobile services gateway server 172 and intranet servers 180, can be counted as an enterprise service usage credit.
In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 issues device provisioning instructions for the device credential list from the enterprise services device group, and for each of the credentials, a service control policy is set on enterprise firewall/secure gateway 171 to allow properly authorized devices to reach the desired destinations listed on the enterprise service activity policy set. The provisioning of enterprise firewall/secure gateway 171 with the enterprise service device group credentials and the enterprise service policy set is illustrated in
In some embodiments, enterprise service design center UI 196 and enterprise service design center 194 are provided as shown in
A carrier provisioning system is typically not capable of providing direct access to an enterprise network administrator (e.g., carrier or enterprise personnel) for the purpose of provisioning such service charging capabilities. For example, such direct access is often not provided due to concerns related to the risk to the entire network that exists if network provisioning controls are made available to many different administrators to program charging allocation policies for many enterprises. However, as described herein, by isolating the required carrier network provisioning information to a secure service design center UI and policy configuration that only influences a small portion of the carrier network policy provisioning available to the carrier service design center and UI, the risk of causing such problems with the carrier network configuration is significantly reduced. Additionally, the process of performing the carrier side of the necessary provisioning is simplified for an administrator or in some cases can be automated.
The service design centers (e.g., carrier service design center 190 and enterprise service design center 194) are shown in
In some embodiments, the enterprise service design center administrator creates or imports the enterprise service device group credentials and the enterprise service policy set using enterprise service design center UI 196. In some embodiments, the information included in the enterprise service device group credentials and the enterprise service policy set is also communicated from enterprise service design center 194 to carrier service design center 190 via the “C” connection designator as shown. For each of the device credentials listed in the enterprise services device group, carrier service design center 190 determines the information it needs to properly provision carrier gateway/home agent 152 with the proper access policy allowances and service usage charging policies to provide enterprise service access and usage credit for communications from device 110 to the enterprise network destination addresses specified in the enterprise service policy set. Programming of this provisioning information to carrier gateway/home agent 152 is indicated by the “A” information connector from carrier service design center 190 to carrier gateway/home agent 152. In some embodiments, this provisioning (e.g., programming) information sent via provisioning communication link “A” to carrier gateway/home agent 152 includes information to facilitate programming the enterprise device group credentials to: (i) receive the desired access service policy permissions, and (ii) implement the desired service usage accounting/charging policy settings. From the enterprise device group credentials list and the enterprise service activity policy set information provided in “C,” carrier service design center 190 determines the information needed to properly provision the service usage reconciliation server function 158. Programming of this provisioning information to service usage reconciliation server function 158 is indicated by the “B” information connector from carrier service design center 190 to service usage reconciliation server function 158. In some embodiments, service usage reconciliation function 158 is part of the carrier network, and service usage reconciliation function 158 implements the charging reconciliation rules to determine how much of the recorded device 110 service usage to place on the user's usage record or service bill (e.g., consumer service usage cost allocation) and how much to place on the enterprise's usage record or service bill (e.g., enterprise service usage cost allocation).
An enterprise may wish to allow consumer services on an end-user device that also allows an employee to access enterprise services over the access network. In some such embodiments, service design center 190 specifies one or more service plans from which the device user can select, and these service plan selection options are configured into a configuration interface on a device software application (e.g., user data app 111, user voice app 112 or service processor framework program 139 (shown, e.g., in
In some embodiments, the initial configuration of device 110 includes one or more enterprise access service plans that allow the user to access certain applications or network destinations associated with enterprise access services, and the user can choose from one or more additional consumer-oriented service plans offered directly on the device UI by a device software application (e.g., user data app 111, user voice app 112, or service processor framework program 139) in communication with a carrier network element responsible for provisioning a new user service plan that in turn activates the service plan chosen by the user, possibly after confirming service payment credit for the user or enterprise entity. In some embodiments, these access service plan options are configured using service design center 190. In some embodiments, these access service plan options are configured using enterprise service design center 194.
In some embodiments in which a user has selected a consumer-oriented service plan in addition to an enterprise service plan, service usage reconciliation function 158 distinguishes between data usage within the enterprise service plan and data usage within the consumer-oriented service plan. In some embodiments, the enterprise does not pay for, backhaul, process, or police data usage associated with the consumer-oriented plan. In some embodiments, service usage reconciliation function 158 determines how much data usage by device 110 is enterprise data usage, and how much data usage by device 110 is consumer data usage. In some embodiments, service usage reconciliation function 158 allocates data usage associated with applications and/or services specified by the enterprise service plan to the enterprise, and data usage associated with applications and/or services specified by the consumer-oriented data plan to the consumer.
The various embodiments described herein with respect to
As another example, an enterprise allocation can also include providing an allowance for a certain level of monthly usage of data and/or voice. In some embodiments, carrier usage accounting server 154 generates a bill for the associated consumer account (e.g., associated with device 110, such as based on the device/user credentials) that reflects the cost of the service usage allocated to consumer service usage and a credit for the cost of service usage allocated to enterprise service usage (e.g., to offset the cost of the enterprise service usage, which can be billed to the enterprise account associated with the enterprise service usage for the device 110). As described herein, based on an allocation of enterprise and consumer service usage, various techniques for billing/charging and generating credits/reporting (e.g., the enterprise can generate the user/employee monthly expense reimbursements to compensate the user/employee for the determined cost of the enterprise service usage and/or other approaches as described herein) can be provided using the network architecture 100 and/or other network architectures, as described herein.
In some embodiments, an enterprise manager manages service usage by specifying an access network service usage limit for a service usage activity (such as data service, voice service, text service, a roaming service, or a more detailed classification of data service such as one or more websites or one or more device applications), and, when that usage limit is reached for a device that is managed by the enterprise manager, a service usage notification message is generated. In some embodiments, the service usage notification message is configured through enterprise service design center UI 196. In some embodiments, the service usage notification message is delivered to device 110. In some embodiments, the service usage notification message is presented to the user via a user interface of device 110.
In some embodiments, the service usage notification message provides information about data usage or the status of device 100. In some embodiments, the service usage notification message is triggered by an event, e.g., detection that device 110 reaches a data usage ceiling, determination that device 110 is roaming, etc. In some embodiments, the service usage notification message provides real-time or near-real-time information about data usage. In some embodiments, the service usage notification message provides information about remaining data usage availability or entitlement. In some embodiments, the service usage notification message comprises a detailed report of enterprise usage by user, user group, device, device group, or location.
In some embodiments, secure enterprise mobile services gateway server 172 is a dedicated enterprise application server for a particular enterprise (e.g., company, government organization, school/university, or another entity). In some embodiments, secure enterprise mobile services gateway server 172 is a carrier or a third party service provider (e.g., a carrier for wireless network services, such as AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and/or various other wireless network service providers/carriers or third party service providers) controlled/managed application server that performs the application server functions for various different enterprises (e.g., as a service/outsourced IT services model). In some embodiments, device 110 is partitioned (e.g., associated with a particular enterprise/MVNO partition and associated enterprise account) based on device credentials and/or VPN to determine a service plan for managing (e.g., to determine how to allocate enterprise/consumer service usage for) device 110. In some embodiments, based on the partition determination of device 110, and the associated service plan for managing device 110, appropriate service usage monitoring and classification can be determined for providing an enterprise and consumer allocation for service usage activities of device 110 based on the associated service plan(s).
For example, by programming the business rules in service usage reconciliation function 158 that determine the service usage accounting allocation between enterprise services and consumer services, many approaches can be provided for creating a service that provides an enterprise service to a device when the device user has selected a consumer service plan or elected to pay for a consumer service plan. As an example, if the device user has chosen a service plan, the enterprise service usage accounted for in enterprise usage record 156 can be billed to the enterprise rather than the consumer. As another example, if the device user has chosen a service plan, the consumer service usage accounted for in user usage record 155 can be billed to the device user rather than the enterprise. As yet another example, if the device user has selected a service plan, the enterprise service usage can be communicated to the enterprise (e.g., and/or the device user), and the enterprise can issue a reimbursement to the device user for the enterprise portion of the user's bill, or pay the carrier directly for a portion of the user's bill, thus reducing the amount the user must pay. In some embodiments, the business rules in service usage reconciliation function 158 are programmed to provide the device user with a certain amount of service usage that may or may not be directly related to enterprise services.
For example, the user can be allocated a certain amount of general purpose browsing that includes network destinations that are not specified in the enterprise service activity policy set. In some embodiments, there is a cap to such general purpose browsing, and carrier service design center 190 can provision the network and/or the device to alert the user regarding how much of the enterprise sponsored browsing remains or when the enterprise sponsored internet browsing cap is reached or exceeded. In some embodiments, the business rules in service usage reconciliation function 158 are programmed to deduct the service usage associated with the enterprise sponsored general purpose browsing, up to the specified cap, from the user's bill. In this way, the user can be allocated an allowance for services that either the enterprise sponsors to account for enterprise related service usage that may not be included in the enterprise service activity policy set or that the enterprise simply desires to sponsor to reduce the device user's consumer service plan billing.
In a similar manner, services other than browsing that are not necessarily associated with enterprise service usage can also be sponsored by the enterprise by properly provisioning the business rules in service usage reconciliation function 158. For example, a catch-all enterprise sponsored allowance (e.g., or cap) for “bulk” internet usage can be provided. The fact that the user is provided with such an allowance may be pointed out to the user if the user disputes how much of his or her device service usage cost should be covered by the enterprise and how much the user should cover personally. Another example is to provide a certain amount of voice minutes to any phone number or to phone numbers not in the enterprise service activity policy set.
In some embodiments, the business rules in service usage reconciliation function 158 are provisioned so that the enterprise specifically does not allow, sponsor, or pay for certain device service usage activities. In some embodiments, these service usage activities can include access to network destinations, applications, or services that pose security risks to enterprise data stored on device 110 or pose security risks to enterprise network 170. In some embodiments, these activities include access to network destinations, applications, or services that the enterprise does not wish to sponsor or that are potentially associated with user activity that violates enterprise policy or laws. For example, the business rules may be configured to allow only transmission of business data on approved networks, e.g., excluding free or unknown WiFi hotspots, or only when device 110 is connected to the network via a VPN. In some embodiments, such service usage activities that violate enterprise security policies or other service usage policies are blocked by the business rules programmed into the network or the device as specified in the enterprise service activity policy set.
By programming the business rules in service usage reconciliation function 158 that determine the service usage accounting allocation between enterprise services and consumer services, many approaches can be provided for creating a service that provides an enterprise service to a device when the device user has not selected a consumer service plan or elected to pay for a consumer service plan. For example, if the device user has not chosen to select or pay for a consumer service plan, carrier gateway/home agent 152 can be programmed to allow service usage for the enterprise service policy set but deny all other access until the user chooses a consumer service plan. In some embodiments, when/if the consumer chooses a consumer service plan then access would be expanded beyond just the enterprise services, because when the service plan activation occurs, consumer service policy set in carrier gateway/home agent 152 will be updated to allow service (e.g., as the carrier administrator user of carrier service design center 190 programs a different set of consumer service access policies for each consumer service plan that can be chosen). In some embodiments, the user is allocated a certain amount of general purpose data access or voice minutes as described above even though the user does not have a consumer data plan. Another example is to provide the user with a certain monetary allowance that is sponsored by the enterprise rather than a service usage amount.
Although enterprise service design center 194 is shown provisioning mobile server usage counter 179 (e.g., shown in
In some embodiments, service usage reconciliation function 158, or secure enterprise mobile services gateway/server 172, or another similar network function, is programmed to review traffic usage patterns of mobile device 110 for the purpose of determining if the device may have fallen into unauthorized hands or if the device secure enterprise communications and data management software may have been hacked or tampered with in a way that endangers enterprise security or causes the enterprise to be billed for usage that is not enterprise usage. For example, service usage reconciliation function 158 (e.g., or secure enterprise mobile services gateway/server 172) can be programmed to monitor “bulk” enterprise service usage for the enterprise device group and trigger a fraud detection alert for a device that exhibits enterprise usage that is higher than a pre-determined “normal” limit. As another example, service usage reconciliation function 158 can be programmed to monitor “bulk” enterprise service usage for the enterprise device group and trigger a fraud detection alert for a device that exhibits enterprise usage access patterns that are determined to be outside of “normal” limits. Examples of usage patterns can include usage as a function of time of day, duration of usage, usage above a certain limit for a subset of service usage activities, and/or usage above a certain limit for all service usage activities.
In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to receive or accept a specification for an access network service usage limit (e.g., a service amount in minutes, bytes, or cost) for a service usage activity (such as a data service, a voice service, a text service, a roaming service, or a more detailed classification of a data service, such as one or more websites or one or more device applications), and the service usage limit is applied to one or more devices 110 or device groups (or users or user groups) managed by enterprise service design center 194. In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is further configured to receive service usage records for device 110, which is managed by enterprise service design center 194, from a network element configured to monitor and report device 110 service usage (e.g., carrier usage accounting server 154, enterprise firewall/security gateway 171, or another network element), and when the usage limit is reached, to generate a service usage notification message. In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to deliver the service usage notification message to enterprise service design center UI 196. In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to deliver the service usage notification message to a software application of device 110 (e.g., service processor framework program 139 or user data app 111) for presentation to the device user through a user interface of device 110.
In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to receive or accept a specification for an access network service notification event consisting of a network access pattern achieved or attempted by device 110 that belongs to a device group (or user group) managed by enterprise service design center 194, wherein the network access pattern is access attempted or achieved by one or more pre-defined device applications, or access attempted or achieved by device 110 to one or more network destinations, websites or network servers. In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is further configured to receive service usage records for device 110, which is managed by enterprise service design center 194, from a network element configured to monitor and report device 110 service usage (e.g., carrier usage accounting server 154, enterprise firewall/security gateway 171, or another network element), and when the service usage indicates that the network access pattern has occurred, enterprise service design center 194 is further configured to send a notification message to enterprise service design center UI 196.
Carrier Managed Billing Allocation with Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Network and Enterprise Firewall/Gateway
There are several reasons that the carrier network may not support numerous enterprise service customers with an enterprise/consumer allocation architecture that requires carrier gateway/home agent 152 to perform the necessary traffic classification or service usage classification as in the
In some embodiments, provisioning with the service design centers and UIs for the embodiment shown in
Because the enterprise service usage is monitored by the enterprise network elements in the embodiments depicted in
In some embodiments, an active network detection function is included on the device to assist the network policy enforcement elements to determine the type of network the device is connected to or to determine if the device is on a home or roaming network, as described herein. For example, the service usage policy allowances provided by the enterprise service activity policy set can be programmed so that the allowances change depending on the availability of a particular network or set of networks, the time of day, the congestion state of a network, or the current cost of service on the network. For example, if the carrier home network is not available and only a roaming network is available, the allowance may be decreased or removed. As another example, if a certain network type is not available but another network type is (e.g., 2G is available instead of 3G or 3G is available instead of 4G), then the allocation can be reduced. As yet another example, if a variable charging policy is in place with the carrier for access when the network is busy or during certain times of day, then the enterprise sponsored allowance can be reduced during times of higher charging.
Enterprise Managed Billing Allocation with Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Network and Enterprise Firewall/Gateway
In some embodiments, provisioning with the service design centers and UIs for the embodiment shown in
Enterprise Usage Credit with Service Usage Monitoring in Enterprise Firewall/Gateway
Carrier Managed Billing Allocation with Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Gateway/Home Agent and Enterprise Mobile Services Gateway Server
Enterprise Managed Billing Allocation with Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Network and Enterprise Mobile Services Gateway Server
Enterprise Usage Credit with Service Usage Monitoring in Enterprise Mobile Services Gateway Server
Carrier Managed Billing Allocation with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Network
In some embodiments, provisioning of the various network architecture elements to facilitate the allocation between enterprise service usage accounting or billing and consumer service usage accounting or billing is established as follows. The device portion of secure network interface 128 and the enterprise server portion of server secure network interface 127 are provisioned with connection “E.” In some embodiments, this provisioning operation with the connection labeled “E” includes programming information for secure network interface 128 to direct enterprise network 170 access traffic associated with application functions running in secure mobile enterprise application environment 120 to enterprise network 170 destinations that are to be sponsored (and, in some embodiments, possibly intermediate network routes) according to the enterprise services policy set, including, for example, the addresses (e.g., IP, IP/port or other higher layer address identifiers) of secure enterprise mobile services gateway/server 172 or enterprise intranet servers 180. In some embodiments, the provisioning operation designated with the connection label “E” also establishes the parameters required for the secure communication of information between secure network interface 128 and server secure network interface 127. In some embodiments, this provisioning step sets up the policies for the authentication process, data encryption, and cryptographic key exchange processes take place to establish secure communication between secure mobile enterprise application environment 120 and secure enterprise services gateway/server 172.
In some embodiments, the enterprise network destinations that are to be sponsored according to the enterprise services policy set identified by provisioning connection “E” are also communicated to carrier service design center 190. For example, this allows carrier service design center 190 to determine and transmit the proper provisioning information to establish the access control policies or service usage accounting policies for these aspects of the enterprise services policy set. Carrier service design center provisioning connections “A” communicate the provisioning information (programming) to carrier gateway/home agent 152. Carrier service design center provisioning connections “B” communicate the provisioning information (programming) to service usage reconciliation function 158.
In some embodiments, the provisioning operation associated with the provisioning connection label “C” provisions enterprise firewall/secure gateway 171 to admit devices 110 with device credentials or application credentials that belong to the desired enterprise services device group associated with the enterprise service policy set. In some embodiments, the provisioning information labeled as “C” includes enterprise network 170 destinations that are to be sponsored (and, in some embodiments, possibly intermediate network routes) according to the enterprise services policy set. In some embodiments, the provisioning information labeled as “C” includes only the network destinations for secure enterprise mobile services gateway/server 172, and devices 110 are not allowed access to other parts of enterprise network 170.
In some embodiments, network architecture 300 for providing enterprise and consumer billing allocation for wireless communication device service usage activities includes executing an enterprise application as a secure enterprise data application 124 in secure mobile enterprise application environment 120 of device 110 in which the secure applications are in network communication (e.g., secure network communication, such as via a virtual private network (VPN) or other secure network communication techniques) with secure enterprise mobile services gateway/server 172 (e.g., executing an enterprise server side of the enterprise authorized/sponsored applications, such as an enterprise email server, an enterprise calendar server, an enterprise contacts server, and/or an enterprise network access server) of the enterprise. In some embodiments, the secure enterprise mobile services gateway/server 172 performs application monitoring that includes counting application service usage (e.g., bytes used in communicating with the device's execution of secure enterprise application 124). In some embodiments, secure enterprise mobile services gateway/server 172 performs application monitoring that further includes classifying application service usage (e.g., classifying secure enterprise application 124 by application/service usage activity such as based on application name or using signed code/hash techniques, by time of day/day of week, enterprise server, destinations, enterprise intranet, and/or other factors).
Carrier Managed Billing Allocation with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Network
Carrier Managed Billing Allocation with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Network and Mobile Services Gateway Server
Enterprise Managed Billing Allocation with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Service Usage Monitoring in Mobile Services Gateway Server
Enterprise Usage Credit with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Service Usage Monitoring in Mobile Services Gateway Server
Device Configurations without Service Usage Monitoring and Reporting
Carrier Managed Billing Allocation with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Network and on Device
In some embodiments, carrier usage accounting server 154 communicates (e.g., using secure communication techniques) with service usage monitor 119 to mediate billing/charging and credit reports, for example, using the various approaches and techniques as described herein.
In some embodiments, service usage monitor 119 and/or another function/agent executed in secure mobile enterprise application environment 120 of device 110 blocks user access for non-enterprise activities that the user has not agreed to pay for.
Because the enterprise service usage is monitored by the device network elements in the embodiments depicted in
For example, the allowances provided by the enterprise service activity policy set can be programmed so that the allowances change depending on the availability of a particular network or set of networks, the time of day, the congestion state of a network, or the current cost of service on the network. As another example, if the carrier home network is not available and only a roaming network is available, the allowance can be decreased or removed. As yet another example, if a certain network type is not available but another network type is (e.g., 2G is available instead of 3G or 3G is available instead of 4G), then the allocation can be reduced. As yet a further example, if a variable charging policy is in place with the carrier for access when the network is busy or during certain times of day, then the enterprise sponsored allowance can be reduced during times of higher charging. As described herein, in some embodiments, an active network detection function can be included on the device to assist the network policy enforcement to determine the type of network the device is connected to or to determine if the device is on a home or roaming network. As also described herein, in some embodiments, a network busy state monitor function can be included on the device to assist the network policy enforcement to determine the network busy state or state of network congestion.
Carrier Managed Billing Allocation with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Service Usage Monitoring in Carrier Network, on Device, and in Enterprise Mobile Services Gateway Server
Enterprise Managed Billing Allocation with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Service Usage Monitoring on Device and in Enterprise Mobile Services Gateway Server
Enterprise Managed Billing Allocation with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Service Usage Monitoring on Device
Enterprise Usage Credit with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Service Usage Monitoring on Device and in Enterprise Mobile Services Gateway Server
Enterprise Usage Credit with Device Mobile Enterprise Services Application Environment and Mobile Services Gateway Server with Usage Monitoring on Device
Device Configurations with Service Usage Monitoring and Reporting
In some embodiments, secure enterprise mobile services application 125 and network stack 121 can be implemented in access modem 129, as described below with respect to
In some embodiments, service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) interacts with network stack framework components 137 or network stack kernel components 135 to inspect traffic for service usage classification and service policy enforcement (e.g., access control policy enforcement, traffic control policy enforcement, service usage accounting, charging policy enforcement, or service notification policy enforcement) purposes. In some embodiments, one or more of network stack framework components 137 and network stack kernel components 135 provides classification information on one or more traffic flows to service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138). In some embodiments, service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) seeks to match the classification information to one or more classification parameters contained in the service policy definitions in order to determine the service policy enforcement actions that may be required for a traffic flow. In some embodiments, a traffic flow is a flow of data packets. In some embodiments, a traffic flow is a flow of one or more data packets that are associated with a device application, the association of a traffic flow to a device application being identified by network stack framework components 137 or network stack kernel components 135 or service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138). In some embodiments, the service usage classification determines that the traffic flow is associated with a combination of one or more of: a device application, a network destination, a traffic type, a content type, a QoS level, a roaming network, a home network.
In some embodiments, the association of traffic flow to a specific device application is used to determine a service policy enforcement action that is dependent on the specific device application. In some embodiments, a specific device application identifier (e.g., an application name, application signature, application hash or application certificate) forms an application credential that is used to index a service policy enforcement action that is intended to be implemented following a service usage activity or attempted service usage activity by the specific device application. In some embodiments, a specific device application is verified as consistent with an application credential in order to ensure that an application service policy enforcement action intended to be applied to the specific device application is applied to the correct application. In some embodiments, the verification that a specific application is consistent with an application credential associated with a service policy enforcement action is performed in service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) to ensure that ensure that an application service policy enforcement action intended to be applied to the specific device application is applied to the correct application. In some embodiments, the verification that a specific application is consistent with an application credential associated with a service policy enforcement action is performed in network stack framework components 137 or network stack kernel components 135, and service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) ascertains the application credential verification to ensure that ensure that an application service policy enforcement action intended to be applied to the specific device application is applied to the correct application.
In some embodiments, the association of traffic flow to a specific device application is used to determine a service policy enforcement action that is dependent on the specific device application, and service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) instructs network stack framework components 137 or network stack kernel components 135 to implement the service policy enforcement action on the traffic flow associated with the specific device application. In some embodiments, the association of traffic flow to a specific device application is used to determine a service policy enforcement action that is dependent on the specific device application, and service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) implements the service policy enforcement action. In some embodiments, a traffic flow is buffered pending classification (e.g., buffered in one or more of network stack framework components 137, network stack kernel components 135, service processor framework program 139, or service processor kernel program 138). In some embodiments, upon classification of the traffic flow (e.g., determination of an association of the traffic flow to a specific device application), a service policy enforcement action that is dependent on the specific device application is determined by service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) and implemented in one or more of network stack framework components 137, network stack kernel components 135, service processor framework program 139, and service processor kernel program 138. In some embodiments, the service policy enforcement action for the traffic flow is implemented in service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138). In some embodiments, service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) instructs a device UI program that displays a device service notification (e.g., a service usage notification, a service plan offer notification, or an indication of a service usage event or attempted service usage event that requires a user notification) to implement the service policy enforcement action for the traffic flow. In some embodiments, service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) instructs a service usage monitor (e.g., accounting traffic to bulk classification or a more detailed classification of service usage) to implement the service policy enforcement action for the traffic flow.
In some embodiments, the network destination of a traffic flow is used to determine if a service policy enforcement action that is dependent on a specific network destination should be applied to the traffic flow. In some embodiments, a traffic flow is inspected by network stack framework components 137 or network stack kernel components 135, and one or more traffic characteristics (e.g., an address, a socket/flow tuple, a layer-7 packet information, or a packet header string) are passed to service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138), wherein the one or more traffic characteristics are matched against one or more classification parameters contained in a service policy definition, and if a match is present then a service policy enforcement action is implemented for the traffic flow. In some embodiments, a traffic flow is inspected by service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138), and one or more traffic characteristics (e.g., an address, a socket/flow tuple, a layer-7 packet information, or a packet header string) are matched against one or more classification parameters contained in a service policy definition, and if a match is present then a service policy enforcement action is implemented for the traffic flow. In some embodiments, the service policy enforcement action for the traffic flow is implemented in service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138). In some embodiments, service processor framework program 139 (or service processor kernel program 138) instructs network stack framework components 137 or network stack kernel components 135 to implement the service policy enforcement action for the traffic flow. In some embodiments, the service policy enforcement action for the traffic flow is implemented by a device UI program that displays a device service notification (e.g., a service usage notification, a service plan offer notification, or an indication of a service usage event or attempted service usage event that requires a user notification). In some embodiments, the service policy enforcement action for the traffic flow is implemented by a service usage monitor (e.g., accounting traffic to bulk classification or a more detailed classification of service usage).
In some embodiments, an enterprise manger can define or select service plan policies that confine enterprise-sponsored access services to a pre-defined list of device applications. For example, an enterprise manager might choose to define or select a service plan wherein only corporate applications may be accessed (e.g., email, contacts, intranet services, text, and/or voice). In such embodiments, enterprise service design user interface 196 may be used by the enterprise manager to define or select the allowable applications that are to have access. In some embodiments, an enterprise access manager may define or select a different set of applications to be accessible when device 110 is roaming than when device 110 is on a home network or on a WiFi network. In some embodiments, an enterprise manager may define or select a set of applications that are to be not allowed access when a device is on a certain network (e.g., a roaming network). For example, many modern smart phone, tablet, and laptop operating systems have background services that have the potential to incur large roaming charges during roaming conditions (e.g., Google Android “gallery” functions that share device data with the Google network, Microsoft “system” functions that do the same, software update programs, etc.). In such cases, enterprise service design center 194 may be used to specify the device applications that are not allowed to access the network during certain network conditions.
In some embodiments, the identification and network access control for a device application is performed with a device software program or agent (e.g., service processor framework program 139 or service processor kernel program 138), and enterprise service design center 194 programs the device agent with the application identification parameters and associated access policies. In some embodiments, the device agent identifies the application using an application name, certificate, signature, or hash for an application running on the device and a policy instruction stored on the device.
In some embodiments, the identification and network access control for a device application is performed with one or more network access policy enforcement elements (e.g., carrier gateway/home agent 152, carrier usage accounting server 154, enterprise firewall/security gateway 171), and enterprise service design center 194 causes the one or more network access policy enforcement elements to be provisioned with the application identification parameters and associated access policies. In some embodiments, the one or more network access policy enforcement elements identify an application by observing the traffic headers inserted by the application. In some embodiments, the one or more network access policy enforcement elements identify an application by observing the network destinations or destination patterns accessed by the application. In some embodiments, the one or more network access policy enforcement elements identify an application by routing or tunneling the application traffic to one or more network gateways or servers associated with the application (e.g., APN routes, dedicated application addressing, or a device agent that steers the application traffic to a server). In some embodiments, the device assists in this routing or tunneling with a device agent that is programmed to route or re-direct the traffic for an application.
In some embodiments, an enterprise manger can define or select service plan policies that confine enterprise-sponsored access services to a pre-defined list of network destinations, servers, or resources. For example, an enterprise manager might choose to define or select a service plan wherein only corporate network destinations may be accessed (e.g., email server, contacts server, intranet servers, text service servers, and VOIP servers). In some embodiments, enterprise service design center interface 196 may be used by an enterprise manager to define or select the allowable network destinations that device 110 may access. In some embodiments, the enterprise access manager may define or select a different set of network destinations when device 110 is roaming than when device 110 is on a home network or on a WiFi network. In some embodiments, an enterprise manager may define or select a set of network destinations that device 110 cannot access when device 110 is on a certain network (e.g., a roaming network). For example, many websites and enterprise services exhibit network access service usage behavior that can incur large roaming charges during roaming conditions (e.g., software update websites or servers, contact database synchronization websites, email download synchronization websites, video conference websites, etc.). In such cases, enterprise service design center 194 may be used to specify the device applications, services, and/or websites that are not to be accessed or used during certain network connection conditions.
In some embodiments, a device agent identifies the network destination and applies the appropriate access policy by comparing traffic characteristics with pre-defined characteristics in the access policy instructions provisioned on device 110, and then applies the corresponding traffic control rule, and enterprise service design center 194 performs the provisioning of the device agent. In some embodiments, the identification and network access control for a network destination is performed with one or more network access policy enforcement elements (e.g., carrier gateway/home agent 152, carrier usage accounting server 154, enterprise firewall/security gateway 171) and enterprise service design center 194 performs the provisioning of the one or more network elements.
In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to receive or accept a specification for an access network service usage limit (e.g., a service amount in minutes, bytes, or cost) for a service usage activity (such as a data service, a voice service, a text service, a roaming service, or a more detailed classification of data service such as one or more websites or one or more device applications), and the service usage limit is applied to one or more devices 110 or device groups (or users or user groups) managed by enterprise service design center 194. In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is further configured to receive service usage records for device 110, which is managed by enterprise service design center 194, from a device-based element that monitors and reports device 110 service usage (e.g., one or more device usage monitors 119, device service processor framework program 139, or service processor kernel program 138, network stack 134, or access modem 151), and when the usage limit is reached a service usage notification message is generated. In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to deliver the service usage notification message to enterprise service design center UI 196. In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to deliver the service usage notification message to a device 110 software application (e.g., service processor framework program 139 or user data app 111) for presentation to the device user via a user interface.
In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to receive or accept a specification for an access network service usage limit (e.g., a service amount in minutes, bytes, or cost) for a service usage activity (such as a data service, a voice service, a text service, a roaming service, or a more detailed classification of data service such as one or more websites or one or more device applications), and the service usage limit is applied to one or more devices 110 or device groups (or users or user groups) managed by enterprise service design center 194. In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is further configured to receive service usage records for device 110, which is managed by the enterprise service design center 194, from a device-based element configured to monitor and report device 110 service usage (e.g., one or more device usage monitors 119, device service processor framework program 139 or service processor kernel program 138, network stack 134, or access modem 151), and when the usage limit is reached a restriction or limitation on further usage is applied by the service design center by provisioning one or more network elements responsible for enforcing network access policy (e.g., carrier gateway/home agent 152, carrier usage accounting server 154, enterprise firewall/security gateway 171). In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to send the user a notification message or a message to contact an enterprise manager.
In some embodiments, secure network interface 128 on device 110 is configured with a VPN device client function to securely communicate between one or more approved enterprise applications (e.g., enterprise data app 124, enterprise voice app 126, secure enterprise mobile services app 125) and a counterpart VPN function that secures access to enterprise network 170 (e.g., enterprise firewall/security gateway 171 or server secure network interface 127). In some embodiments, a device software application or agent (e.g., service processor framework program 139 or service processor kernel program 138, secure network interface 128, secure hardware partition manager 108) is configured to identify network access activity associated with individual applications and allow network access to one or more approved enterprise applications when a VPN device client function is in operation, or not allow network access to one or more approved enterprise applications when a VPN device client function is not in operation. In some embodiments, service design center 190 or enterprise service design center 194 is configured to provision a device 110 software application or agent (e.g., service processor framework program 139 or service processor kernel program 138, secure network interface 128, secure hardware partition manager 108) with application access policy rules to identify network access activity associated with individual applications and allow network access to one or more approved enterprise applications when a VPN device client function is in operation, or not allow network access to one or more approved enterprise applications when a VPN device client function is not in operation. In this manner, enterprise applications that might be subject to spoofing by network elements, websites, servers, or programs operating outside the secure enterprise environment are not placed in communication with such network elements.
In some embodiments, a device software application or agent (e.g., service processor framework program 139 or service processor kernel program 138, secure network interface 128, secure hardware partition manager 108) is configured to identify network access activity associated with individual applications and not allow network access to one or more non-approved applications when a VPN device client function is in operation, or allow network access to one or more non-approved applications when a VPN device client function is not in operation. In some embodiments, service design center 190 or enterprise service design center 194 is configured to provision a device 110 software application or agent (e.g., service processor framework program 139 or service processor kernel program 138, secure network interface 128, secure hardware partition manager 108) with application access policy rules to identify network access activity associated with individual applications and not allow network access to one or more non-approved applications when a VPN device client function is in operation, or allow network access to one or more enterprise applications when a VPN device client function is not in operation. In this manner, applications that might maliciously access enterprise network resources when the VPN is running are not permitted to do so.
In some embodiments, the application access policy rules are enforced by allowing or not allowing an application to access the network. In some embodiments, the application access policy rules are enforced by allowing or not allowing the application to run. In some embodiments, the identification of approved enterprise applications associated with traffic flows is confirmed or secured by identifying the application certificate and comparing it to an application signature or hash on the device. In some embodiments, the identity of an approved enterprise application is confirmed by inspecting an application certificate, signature or hash that is provided by service design center 190 or enterprise service design center 194.
In some embodiments, secure network interface 128 is configured with a split-tunnel VPN device client function, wherein an enterprise side of the split tunnel is configured to securely communicate between one or more enterprise applications (e.g., enterprise data app 124, enterprise voice app 126, secure enterprise mobile services app 125) and a counterpart VPN function that secures access to the enterprise network 170 (e.g., enterprise firewall/security gateway 171 or server secure network interface 127), and a consumer side of the split tunnel is configured to communicate without encryption for access network services provided to consumer applications on the device. In some embodiments, a device software application or agent (e.g. service processor framework program 139 or service processor kernel program 138, secure network interface 128, secure hardware partition manager 108) is configured to identify network access activity associated with individual applications and route or direct traffic associated with one or more enterprise applications to the enterprise side of the split VPN tunnel, and route or direct traffic associated with one or more consumer applications to the consumer side of the VPN tunnel. In some embodiments, service design center 190 or enterprise service design center 194 is configured to provision a device 110 software application or agent (e.g., service processor framework program 139 or service processor kernel program 138, secure network interface 128, secure hardware partition manager 108) with application access policy rules to identify network access activity associated with individual applications and specify which applications are to be routed or directed to the enterprise side of the VPN tunnel and which applications are to be routed or directed to the consumer side of the VPN tunnel. In some embodiments, the identification of applications associated with traffic flows is secured by identifying the application certificate and comparing it to an application signature or hash on the device. In some embodiments, the application certificate, signature or hash is provided by service design center 190 or enterprise service design center 194.
In some embodiments, the policy rules only enable secure applications on device 110 to access enterprise data. In some embodiments, an enterprise manager sets policy rules that do not allow secure applications on device 110 to upload data to unsecure destinations.
In some embodiments, service design center 190 is configured to provide enterprise service design center 194. In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 comprises a policy management system configured to select a set of access network policies to be enforced for one or more device groups (or user groups) where the set of access network policies consists of a subset of the full set of access network policies capable of being enforced by the access network policy enforcement elements. In some embodiments, the subset of the full set of policies capable of being enforced by the access network policy enforcement elements comprises a pre-defined subset of the policy configuration capabilities. In some embodiments, the enterprise service design center policy management subset limitations for enterprise service design center 194 provide the ability to define and manage one or more of the policies that define a service policy set or service plan that is applied to a given device, user, device group or user group. In some embodiments, the enterprise service design center policy management subset limitations for enterprise service design center 194 can provide the ability to enroll a device, user, device group or user group in a set limited to one or more pre-defined service policy configurations or service plans.
As an example embodiment, the enterprise service design center policy management subset limitations for enterprise service design center 194 may provide the following policy definition and management capabilities for a device (or user) or device group (or user group): specify service usage limits (caps) for bulk access service or for a specific classification of access service activities, require all traffic or certain traffic associated with enterprise-critical applications or content to be communicated via an enterprise VPN, define controls for which applications that can access the network or certain defined destinations on the network, specify network destinations that are allowed or not allowed, specify roaming service limitations, specify WiFi networks that are allowed or not allowed, specify security settings in the device access control or I/O access control ports, specify service usage notification triggers and notification content associated with the triggers (e.g., warnings when a specified service usage activity occurs, access is not allowed for a given attempted service usage activity, or service usage reaches a limit), and other such examples that are allowed to be managed under the policy management subset limitations. In some embodiments, the charging rates for such services may not be allowed to be managed under the policy management subset limitations.
In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 has an allowable subset of the full set of policies capable of being enforced by the access network policy enforcement elements that comprises a pre-defined set of one or more access network policy configurations (e.g., service plans). As an example embodiment, the set of pre-configured service plans may be defined for a certain implementation of enterprise service design center 194 comprising multiple pre-defined service plans, each of which provides variations in one or more of service notification policy, access control policy, service classification policy, service QoS policy, or service charging policy.
In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 is configured to allow a service design administrator to select one or more pre-configured access network policy configurations (or service plans) to be applied to a device, a user, a device group or a user group.
In some embodiments, enterprise service design center 194 comprises a device enrollment management system configured to enroll a device credential into a device group (or a user credential into a user group), where the set of device credentials (or user credentials) that enterprise service design center 194 is capable of managing is a subset of the device credentials (or user credentials) allowed on the access network. In some embodiments, the subset of device credentials (or user credentials) that are subject to management by enterprise service design center 194 is defined using service design center 190.
As an example embodiment, the set of pre-defined service plans that are made available to a first enterprise service design center 194 implementation managed by a first enterprise entity might consist of three service plans, wherein the first service plan comprises network policies (e.g., access policies, charging policies, or notification policies) that provide for limited or restricted home network access service but do not provide for roaming access services, the second service plan comprises network policies that provide for unlimited or unrestricted home network access service and also provide for limited roaming access services, and the third service plan comprises network policies that provide for unlimited or unrestricted home network access service and also provide for unlimited or unrestricted roaming access services. In another example embodiment, on the same carrier access network as the previous example, a second enterprise service design center 194 implementation managed by a second enterprise entity might consist of two service plans, wherein the two service plans might be the same as two of the service plans from the previous example embodiment, or they might be completely different.
Given these examples, it will now be understood and appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that enterprise service design center 194 provides a convenient means of designing and distributing custom service plans to different enterprise entities that meet the needs of each enterprise entity, wherein the various policy definition capabilities disclosed herein can be used in a large number of combinations to create the service plans, with the number of combinations of service plan design capabilities being too numerous to list here. It will also now be understood and appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that each enterprise can effectively manage its devices (or users) and device groups (or user groups) to provide the appropriate level of policy control needed by the enterprise in a simplified manner, without the need to manage all the full policy capabilities of the access network.
For example, the embodiments of service design center 190 and enterprise service design center 194 disclosed herein support a carrier network business process wherein a carrier network manager utilizes service design center 190 to create a set of access network policies that consist of a subset of the full set of access network policies capable of being enforced by the access network policy enforcement elements (referred to as specialized enterprise service plans), and the specialized enterprise service plans are designed and offered to meet the special needs of one or more enterprise entities. In some embodiments, an enterprise manager uses enterprise service design center 194 to apply the one or more specialized enterprise service plans to one or more devices (or users) or device groups (or user groups) that belong to the enterprise entity's mobile device inventory (or employee list). The different needs of various employee groups (or device types) can be among the factors that determine which service plan is assigned to a given user group (or device group). The specific needs of an employee can assist in determining which user group (or device group) the employee should be assigned to. The carrier manager can also create other specialized enterprise service plans for other enterprise entities to meet varied needs among enterprise market customers.
In some embodiments, an enterprise manager controls access network usage, costs, and access limits for an employee user group (e.g., a group of devices that could be as small as a single device or as large as all devices under the enterprise manager's control). In some embodiments, the enterprise manager establishes at least two user groups and establishes and manages different network-access policies for different employee user groups. For example, the enterprise manager may set and manage different policies for data usage on WiFi, 3G, 4G, or other networks for different employee user groups. Likewise, the enterprise manager may set different roaming privileges for different employee user groups.
In some embodiments, an enterprise manager sets expenditure ceilings by limiting allowed data usage for secure business applications to enforce security rules. In some embodiments, an enterprise manager tracks enterprise data access to improve compliance records. For example, the enterprise manager can track enterprise data usage by employee, device, application, location, network, or time of day.
Process Flows for Providing Enterprise and Consumer Billing Allocation for Wireless Communication Device Service Usage Activities
Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive. In particular, many of the embodiments are not limited to supporting an enterprise/consumer split. As would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the disclosed embodiments may be applied, for example, when a sponsor entity subsidizes a cost associated with an end-user device's use of a sponsored (or ambient) data service or application, and the user pays for the end-user device's use of non-sponsored (or non-ambient) data services or applications. The sponsor entity may use enterprise service design center 194 to configure devices that may use the sponsored service, policies applicable to the sponsored service, etc. Moreover, the disclosed embodiments may be applied when a first sponsor subsidizes a cost associated with an end-user device's use of a first sponsored data service or application, a second sponsor subsidizes a cost associated with the end-user device's use of a second sponsored data service or application, and the user pays for the end-user device's use of non-sponsored data services or applications. The sponsor entities may use one or more enterprise service design centers to configure aspects of the sponsored services. As would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, there are many other environments in which the disclosed embodiments are useful or applicable.
Several advantageous combination embodiments are now disclosed for allocating enterprise service usage accounting and personal service usage accounting. These combinations are for example purposes, are not meant to be exhaustive or limiting in any way; as will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, these combinations represent only a fraction of the embodiments provided herein.
In some embodiments, a network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device comprises (i) a first service design center configured to receive an accounting split classification policy defining the classification rules for dividing an overall access network service usage into an enterprise service usage allocation and a personal service usage allocation, (ii) a network provisioning instruction translator configured to receive the accounting split classification policy and translate it to a set of network service usage classification and reporting instructions for one or more network elements responsible for classifying service usage, (iii) a network provisioning system for communicating the set of network service usage classification and reporting instructions to the one or more network elements responsible for classifying service usage, (iv) the one or more network elements responsible for classifying service usage configured to classify service usage to determine the enterprise service usage allocation and the personal service usage allocation, and generate service usage reports, and (v) a service usage accounting system that receives the service usage reports and (a) accrues the enterprise service usage allocation, and (b) accrues the personal service usage allocation.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the first network access notification message policy is associated with a first device group defined by a first list of device credentials or a first user group defined by a first list of user credentials, and the service design center is further configured to obtain a second network access notification message policy comprising a plurality of second network access trigger conditions and, for each of the plurality of second network access trigger conditions, an associated second network access notification message, the second network access notification message policy associated with a second device group defined by a second list of device credentials or a second user group defined by a second list of user credentials.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device further comprises a master service design center configured to define a first notification policy design capability set for the first service design center, the first notification policy design capability set comprising a first subset of a master policy capability set. This embodiment can be further augmented wherein the master service design center is further configured to define a second notification policy design capability set for a second service design center, the second notification policy design capability set comprising a second subset of the master policy capability set, the second subset of the master policy capability set either identical to or different from the first subset of the master policy capability set.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device is further augmented wherein the first service design center is hosted on an operator network. In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device is optimized for smaller enterprise data center deployments wherein the first service design center is hosted on an enterprise business network.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the enterprise service usage allocation comprises a classification of service usage that specifies one or more enterprise device software applications. In some embodiments, the enterprise applications can be one or more of email, calendar, contacts, enterprise intranet (e.g., a secure intranet browser with a secure SSL connection or other secure connection to enterprise services), mobile device synchronization or mobile enterprise communications.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the enterprise service usage allocation comprises a classification of service usage that specifies one or more enterprise network destinations.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the enterprise service usage allocation comprises a classification of service usage that specifies one or more enterprise network destinations and the one or more enterprise network destinations comprise an address or identifier for a secure enterprise gateway. In some embodiments, the enterprise gateway comprises a VPN server.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the enterprise service usage allocation comprises a classification of service usage that specifies one or more enterprise network destinations and the one or more enterprise network destinations comprise an address or identifier for one or more secure enterprise mobile services gateways or servers comprising one or more of an email server, a calendar server, a contacts server, an enterprise intranet access server, a mobile device synchronization services server or a mobile enterprise communication server.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the one or more network elements responsible for classifying service usage and generating service usage reports comprises a service usage monitor located in a wireless operator network.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the one or more network elements responsible for classifying service usage and generating service usage reports comprises a service usage monitor located in an enterprise access network.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the one or more network elements responsible for classifying service usage and generating service usage reports comprises a service usage monitor located on a wireless device.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the service usage accounting system is located in an enterprise network.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the service usage accounting system is managed by an enterprise manager under the control of the entity that manages an enterprise business.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the service usage accounting system is located in an operator network.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the service usage accounting system is managed by an operator manager under the control of the entity that manages a network operator.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the service usage accounting system is further configured to credit a user account with a service usage credit or monetary credit associated with the accrued enterprise service usage allocation.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the service usage accounting system is further configured to debit a user account with a service usage debit or monetary cost associated with the accrued personal service usage allocation.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the service usage accounting system is further configured to credit an enterprise account with a service usage credit or monetary credit associated with the accrued personal service usage allocation.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented wherein the service usage accounting system is further configured to debit an enterprise account with a service usage debit or monetary cost associated with the accrued enterprise service usage allocation.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device can be augmented by further configuring the service design center to: (i) receive a personal service plan offer comprising one or more service plans for personal network access services accounted to the personal service usage allocation, (ii) configure a device user interface service plan offer notification message, (iii) communicate the device user interface service plan offer notification message to one or more device groups comprising a collection of devices identified by device credentials, (iv) receive a service plan selection option from an end user device user in response to the device user interface service plan offer notification message, and (v) cause one or more network elements responsible for activating service plans to activate the service plan selection chosen by the end user device user.
In some embodiments the end-user device system in communication with the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage comprises: (i) a device software application environment comprising: (a) an enterprise application execution environment configured with: (1) an enterprise application execution memory and data memory to support secure execution of enterprise software applications, the enterprise software applications comprising applications approved to execute in the secure execution environment and to communicate with secure enterprise services, (2) a secure enterprise communication link configured to provide communication between the enterprise software applications and enterprise network services, the enterprise network services comprising enterprise network resources and servers, (b) a personal application execution environment configured with execution memory and data memory to support execution of personal software applications not approved to execute in the secure execution environment, (ii) a personal service plan selection user interface comprising a notification software agent configured to receive personal service plan offer from a network element and display the service plan offers, the personal service plan offer comprising one or more service plans for personal network access services accounted to a personal service usage allocation, and receive a service plan selection option from an end user device user and forward the service plan selection option to a network element.
In some embodiments, the end-user device system can be augmented wherein the secure enterprise communication link comprises a VPN client in communication with an enterprise VPN gateway.
In some embodiments, the end-user device system can be augmented wherein the enterprise network services comprise access to one or more secure enterprise mobile services gateways or servers comprising one or more of an email server, a calendar server, a contacts server, an enterprise intranet access server, a mobile device synchronization services server or a mobile enterprise communication server.
In some embodiments, the end-user device system can be augmented wherein the enterprise application execution environment is further configured to: (i) acquire a device software application signature prior to allowing execution of the device software application in the virtual machine operating environment, (ii) compare the signature to an approved list of signatures, (iii) allow the application to execute if it is on the list, and (iv) not allow the application to execute if it is not on the list.
In some embodiments, the end-user device system can be augmented wherein enterprise application execution environment comprises a virtual machine operating environment.
In some embodiments, the end-user device system can be augmented wherein enterprise application execution environment comprises a secure CPU hardware execution partition.
In some embodiments, the end-user device system can be augmented wherein enterprise application execution environment comprises a secure operating system execution partition.
In some embodiments, the end-user device system can be augmented wherein enterprise application execution environment comprises a secure memory area protected by an enterprise application software program that encrypts the enterprise data stored on device memory and runs a secure encrypted communication protocol for communication with a secure mobile enterprise services gateway server.
Several advantageous combination embodiments are now disclosed for providing enterprise control of network access service to an end user device. These combinations are for example purposes, are not meant to be exhaustive or limiting in any way; as would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, these combinations represent only a fraction of the advantageous embodiment combinations provided herein.
In some embodiments, a network system for providing network access service control for an end user device comprising: (i) a first service design center configured to receive from an administrator user or a configuration file a first network access policy comprising a first set of network access service permissions associated with an end user device or end user device user, (ii) a network provisioning instruction translator configured to receive the first network access policy and translate it to a set of network access policy enforcement instructions for one or more network elements responsible for controlling network access, (iii) a network provisioning system for communicating the set of network access policy enforcement instructions to the one or more network elements responsible for controlling network access, (iv) the one or more network elements responsible for controlling network access configured to execute the set of network access policy enforcement instructions to enforce network access service permissions and limits.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy is associated with a first device group defined by a first list of device credentials or a first user group defined by a first list of user credentials, and the service design center is further configured to obtain a second network access policy comprising a second set of network access service permissions and, the second network access policy associated with a second device group defined by a second list of device credentials or a second user group defined by a second list of user credentials.
In some embodiments, the network system for classifying the accounting of access network service usage for an end user device further comprises a master service design center configured to define a first network access policy design capability set for the first service design center, the first network access policy design capability set comprising a first subset of a master policy capability set. This embodiment can be further augmented wherein the master service design center is further configured to define a second network access policy design capability set for a second service design center, the second network access policy design capability set comprising a second subset of the master policy capability set, the second subset of the master policy capability set either identical to or different from the first subset of the master policy capability set.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more service usage limits or service cost limits.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more roaming network service usage limits or service cost limits.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more network type restrictions, wherein a network type comprises one or more of a cellular network, a 2G network, a 3G network, a 4G network, a WiFi network, a particular WiFi network APN, roaming cellular network, a particular cellular operator network.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more device application software network access restrictions.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more network destination access restrictions.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more enterprise network destination allowances or restrictions.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more enterprise network destination allowances or restrictions communicated over a secure VPN communication link.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more application or network destination allowances or restrictions communicated over a non-secure communication link.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more personal application or network destination allowances or restrictions.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the first network access policy defines a set of one or more geographic location allowances or restrictions.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the one or more network elements responsible for controlling network access comprises a service usage monitor located in a wireless operator network.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the one or more network elements responsible for controlling network access comprises a service usage monitor located in an enterprise access network. In some embodiments, the one or more network elements responsible for controlling network access comprises a service usage monitor located in an enterprise access network comprise a VPN gateway wherein all device traffic is communicated from the device to the VPN gateway configured to control the device traffic. In some embodiments, the VPN gateway performs service usage classification to identify and control enterprise traffic. In some embodiments, the VPN gateway performs service usage classification to identify and control personal traffic.
In some embodiments, the network system for providing network access service control can be augmented wherein the one or more network elements responsible for controlling network access comprises a service usage monitor located on a wireless device.
The following U.S. applications are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes: application Ser. No. 13/248,028, filed Sep. 28, 2011, entitled ENTERPRISE ACCESS CONTROL AND ACCOUNTING ALLOCATION FOR ACCESS NETWORKS; application Ser. No. 12/380,780, entitled AUTOMATED DEVICE PROVISIONING AND ACTIVATION, filed Mar. 2, 2009; application Ser. No. 12/380,778, filed Mar. 2, 2009, entitled VERIFIABLE DEVICE ASSISTED SERVICE USAGE BILLING WITH INTEGRATED ACCOUNTING, MEDIATION ACCOUNTING, AND MULTI-ACCOUNT; Provisional Application No. 61/206,354, entitled SERVICES POLICY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD, filed Jan. 28, 2009; Provisional Application No. 61/206,944, entitled SERVICES POLICY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD, filed Feb. 4, 2009; Provisional Application No. 61/207,393, entitled SERVICES POLICY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD filed Feb. 10, 2009; Provisional Application No. 61/207,739, entitled SERVICES POLICY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD filed Feb. 13, 2009; and Provisional Application No. 61/387,243, entitled ENTERPRISE AND CONSUMER BILLING ALLOCATION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE SERVICE USAGE ACTIVITIES filed Sep. 28, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5131020 | Liebesny et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5283904 | Carson et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5325532 | Crosswy et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5572528 | Shuen | Nov 1996 | A |
5577100 | McGregor et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5594777 | Makkonen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5617539 | Ludwig et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630159 | Zancho | May 1997 | A |
5633484 | Zancho et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633868 | Baldwin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5751719 | Chen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754953 | Briancon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774532 | Gottlieb et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5794142 | Vanttila et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5814798 | Zancho | Sep 1998 | A |
5889477 | Fastenrath | Mar 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903845 | Buhrmann et al. | May 1999 | A |
5915008 | Dulman | Jun 1999 | A |
5915226 | Martineau | Jun 1999 | A |
5933778 | Buhrmann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940472 | Newman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5974439 | Bollella | Oct 1999 | A |
5983270 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6035281 | Crosskey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038452 | Strawczynski et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038540 | Krist et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047268 | Bartoli et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058434 | Wilt et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061571 | Tamura | May 2000 | A |
6064878 | Denker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078953 | Vaid et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081591 | Skoog | Jun 2000 | A |
6098878 | Dent et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104700 | Haddock et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115823 | Velasco et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119933 | Wong et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125391 | Meltzer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141565 | Feuerstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141686 | Jackowski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148336 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6157636 | Voit et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185576 | Mcintosh | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198915 | McGregor et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219786 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226277 | Chuah | May 2001 | B1 |
6246870 | Dent et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263055 | Garland et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292828 | Williams | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6317584 | Abu-Amara et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6370139 | Redmond | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6381316 | Joyce et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6393014 | Daly et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397259 | Lincke et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401113 | Lazaridis et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6418147 | Wiedeman | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438575 | Khan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445777 | Clark | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449479 | Sanchez | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466984 | Naveh et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477670 | Ahmadvand | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502131 | Vaid et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505114 | Luciani | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510152 | Gerszberg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522629 | Anderson, Sr. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532235 | Benson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532579 | Sato et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535855 | Cahill et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535949 | Parker | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539082 | Lowe et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542500 | Gerszberg et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542992 | Peirce et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546016 | Gerszberg et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563806 | Yano et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570974 | Gerszberg et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574321 | Cox et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574465 | Marsh et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578076 | Putzolu | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6581092 | Motoyama | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591098 | Shieh et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598034 | Kloth | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601040 | Kolls | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603969 | Vuoristo et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603975 | Inouchi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6628934 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631122 | Arunachalam et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636721 | Threadgill et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639975 | O'Neal et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640097 | Corrigan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640334 | Rasmussen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650887 | McGregor et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651101 | Gai et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654786 | Fox et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654814 | Britton et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658254 | Purdy et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662014 | Walsh | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678516 | Nordman et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683853 | Kannas et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684244 | Goldman et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690918 | Evans et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697821 | Ziff et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6725031 | Watler et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725256 | Albal et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732176 | Stewart et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6735206 | Oki et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6748195 | Phillips | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748437 | Mankude et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751296 | Albal et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754470 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757717 | Goldstein | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760417 | Wallenius | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763000 | Walsh | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763226 | McZeal, Jr. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765864 | Natarajan et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765925 | Sawyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6782412 | Brophy et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785889 | Williams | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792461 | Hericourt | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6829596 | Frazee | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6829696 | Balmer et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6839340 | Voit et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6842628 | Arnold et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6873988 | Herrmann et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876653 | Ambe et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879825 | Daly | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6882718 | Smith | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885997 | Roberts | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6901440 | Bimm et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6920455 | Weschler | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922562 | Ward et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928280 | Xanthos et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934249 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934751 | Jayapalan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947723 | Gumani Roger et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6947985 | Hegli et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952428 | Necka et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6957067 | Iyer et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6959202 | Heinonen et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959393 | Hollis et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965667 | Trabandt et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965872 | Grdina | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6967958 | Ono et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970692 | Tysor | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970927 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6982733 | McNally et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6983370 | Eaton et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996062 | Freed et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6996076 | Forbes et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6996393 | Pyhalammi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6998985 | Reisman et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002920 | Ayyagari et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007295 | Rose et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013469 | Smith et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017189 | DeMello et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7024200 | McKenna et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7024460 | Koopmas et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027055 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027408 | Nabkel et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031733 | Alminana et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032072 | Quinn et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039027 | Bridgelall | May 2006 | B2 |
7039037 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7039403 | Wong | May 2006 | B2 |
7039713 | Van Gunter et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7042988 | Juitt et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043225 | Patel et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7043226 | Yamauchi | May 2006 | B2 |
7043268 | Yukie et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047276 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058022 | Carolan et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058968 | Rowland et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068600 | Cain | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069248 | Huber | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7082422 | Zirngibl et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7084775 | Smith | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092696 | Hosain et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7095754 | Benveniste | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102620 | Harries et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110753 | Campen | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113780 | Mckenna et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113997 | Jayapalan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120133 | Joo et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133386 | Holur et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7133695 | Beyda | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7136361 | Benveniste | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139569 | Kato | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142876 | Trossen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149229 | Leung | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7149521 | Sundar et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151764 | Heinonen et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7158792 | Cook et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7162237 | Silver et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7165040 | Ehrman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167078 | Pourchot | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174156 | Mangal | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7174174 | Boris et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177919 | Truong et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7180855 | Lin | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7181017 | Nagel et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7191248 | Chattopadhyay et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197321 | Erskine et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200112 | Sundar et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7200551 | Senez | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7203169 | Okholm et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7203721 | Ben-Efraim et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7203752 | Rice et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212491 | Koga | May 2007 | B2 |
7219123 | Fiechter et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7222190 | Klinker et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222304 | Beaton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224968 | Dobson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228354 | Chambliss et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236780 | Benco | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242668 | Kan et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7242920 | Morris | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245901 | McGregor et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248570 | Bahl et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251218 | Jorgensen | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260382 | Lamb et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7266371 | Amin et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7269157 | Klinker et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7271765 | Stilp et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272660 | Powers et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7280816 | Fratti et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7280818 | Clayton | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283561 | Picher-Dempsey | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7283963 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7286834 | Walter | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286848 | Vireday et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289489 | Kung et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7290283 | Copeland, III | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7310424 | Gehring et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313237 | Bahl et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315892 | Freimuth et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7317699 | Godfrey et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7318111 | Zhao | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320029 | Rinne et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322044 | Hrastar | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324447 | Morford | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7325037 | Lawson | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336960 | Zavalkovsky et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340772 | Panasyuk et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346410 | Uchiyama | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349695 | Oommen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353533 | Wright et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356011 | Waters et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356337 | Florence | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366497 | Nagata | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366654 | Moore | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369848 | Jiang | May 2008 | B2 |
7369856 | Ovadia | May 2008 | B2 |
7373136 | Watler et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373179 | Stine et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379731 | Natsuno et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7388950 | Elsey et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389412 | Sharma et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391724 | Alakoski et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395244 | Kingsford | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7401338 | Bowen et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7403763 | Maes | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409447 | Assadzadeh | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7409569 | Illowsky et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7411930 | Montojo et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418253 | Kavanah | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418257 | Kim | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421004 | Feher | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7423971 | Mohaban et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7428750 | Dunn et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7433362 | Mallya et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436816 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440433 | Rink et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444669 | Bahl et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7450591 | Korling et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7450927 | Creswell et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454191 | Dawson et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457265 | Julka et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457870 | Lownsbrough et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7460837 | Diener | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466652 | Lau et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467160 | McIntyre | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472189 | Mallya et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7478420 | Wright et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486185 | Culpepper et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7486658 | Kumar | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493659 | Wu et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7496652 | Pezzutti | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499438 | Hinman et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7499537 | Elsey et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7502672 | Kolls | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7505756 | Bahl | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505795 | Lim et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7508799 | Sumner et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512128 | DiMambro et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512131 | Svensson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515608 | Yuan et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7515926 | Bu et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7516219 | Moghaddam et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522549 | Karaoguz et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522576 | Du et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526541 | Roese et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529204 | Bourlas et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7535880 | Hinman et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7536695 | Alam et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539132 | Werner et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539862 | Edgett et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7540408 | Levine et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7545782 | Rayment et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546460 | Maes | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546629 | Albert et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548875 | Mikkelsen et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548976 | Bahl et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551921 | Petermann | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551922 | Roskowski et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554983 | Muppala | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7555757 | Smith et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561899 | Lee | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562213 | Timms | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7564799 | Holland et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7565141 | Macaluso | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574509 | Nixon et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574731 | Fascenda | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7577431 | Jiang | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7580356 | Mishra et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7580857 | VanFleet et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583964 | Wong | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7584298 | Klinker et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586871 | Hamilton et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593417 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593730 | Khandelwal et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596373 | Mcgregor et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599288 | Cole et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7599714 | Kuzminskiy | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7602746 | Calhoun et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606918 | Holzman et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607041 | Kraemer et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609650 | Roskowski et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609700 | Ying et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7610047 | Hicks, III et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610057 | Bahl et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610328 | Haase et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610396 | Taglienti et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7614051 | Glaum et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616962 | Oswal et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617516 | Huslak et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620041 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620065 | Falardeau | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620162 | Aaron et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620383 | Taglienti et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627314 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7627600 | Citron et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7627767 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7627872 | Hebeler et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7633438 | Tysowski | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634388 | Archer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636574 | Poosala | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636626 | Oesterling et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643411 | Andreasen et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7644151 | Jerrim et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7644267 | Ylikoski et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7644414 | Smith et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647047 | Moghaddam et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650137 | Jobs et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653394 | McMillin | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656271 | Ehrman et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7657920 | Arseneau et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660419 | Ho | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7661124 | Ramanathan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664494 | Jiang | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668176 | Chuah | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668612 | Okkonen | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7668903 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668966 | Klinker et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676673 | Weller et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680086 | Eglin | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681226 | Kraemer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7684370 | Kezys | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685131 | Batra et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685254 | Pandya | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685530 | Sherrard et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7688792 | Babbar et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693107 | De Froment | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7693720 | Kennewick et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697540 | Haddad et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707320 | Singhai et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7710932 | Muthuswamy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7711848 | Maes | May 2010 | B2 |
7719966 | Luft et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720206 | Devolites et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720464 | Batta | May 2010 | B2 |
7720505 | Gopi et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720960 | Pruss et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7721296 | Ricagni | May 2010 | B2 |
7724716 | Fadell | May 2010 | B2 |
7725570 | Lewis | May 2010 | B1 |
7729326 | Sekhar | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730123 | Erickson et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7734784 | Araujo et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7742406 | Muppala | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7746854 | Ambe et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747240 | Briscoe et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7747699 | Prueitt et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747730 | Harlow | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7752330 | Olsen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756056 | Kim et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756534 | Anupam et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756757 | Oakes, III | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7760137 | Martucci et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7760711 | Kung et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7760861 | Croak et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7765294 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769397 | Funato et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7770785 | Jha et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774323 | Helfman | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774412 | Schnepel | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7774456 | Lownsbrough et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7778176 | Morford | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778643 | Laroia et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792257 | Vanier et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7792538 | Kozisek | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7792708 | Alva | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7797019 | Friedmann | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7797060 | Grgic et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7797204 | Balent | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7797401 | Stewart et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801523 | Kenderov | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7801783 | Kende et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801985 | Pitkow et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7802724 | Nohr | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7805140 | Friday et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805522 | Schlüter et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805606 | Birger et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809351 | Panda et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7809372 | Rajaniemi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7813746 | Rajkotia | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817615 | Breau et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7817983 | Cassett et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822837 | Urban et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7822849 | Titus | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826427 | Sood et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7826607 | De Carvalho Resende et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7835275 | Swan et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7843831 | Morrill et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843843 | Papp, III et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7844034 | Oh et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7844728 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7848768 | Omori et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7849161 | Koch et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7849170 | Hargens et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7849477 | Cristofalo et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853255 | Karaoguz et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853656 | Yach et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7856226 | Wong et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7860088 | Lioy | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865182 | Macaluso | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7865187 | Ramer et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7868778 | Kenwright | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873001 | Silver | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873344 | Bowser et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873346 | Petersson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873540 | Arumugam | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873705 | Kalish | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7877090 | Maes | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881199 | Krstulich | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7881697 | Baker et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882029 | White | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882247 | Sturniolo et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882560 | Kraemer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885644 | Gallagher et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7886047 | Potluri | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7889384 | Armentrout et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890084 | Dudziak et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7890111 | Bugenhagen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894431 | Goring et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899039 | Andreasen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7899438 | Baker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7903553 | Liu | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907970 | Park et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7911975 | Droz et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912025 | Pattenden et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912056 | Brassem | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7920529 | Mahler et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7921463 | Sood et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7925740 | Math et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7925778 | Wijnands et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7929446 | Bozarth et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7929959 | DeAtley et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7929960 | Martin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7929973 | Zavalkovsky et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930327 | Craft et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930446 | Kesselman et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930553 | Satarasinghe et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933274 | Verma et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7936736 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7937069 | Rassam | May 2011 | B2 |
7937450 | Janik | May 2011 | B2 |
7940685 | Breslau et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7940751 | Hansen | May 2011 | B2 |
7941184 | Prendergast et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7944948 | Chow et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7945238 | Baker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7945240 | Klock et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7945945 | Graham et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948952 | Hurtta et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948953 | Melkote et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948968 | Voit et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949529 | Weider et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7953808 | Sharp et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7953877 | Vemula et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7957020 | Mine et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7957381 | Clermidy et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7957511 | Drudis et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7958029 | Bobich et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7962622 | Friend et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7965983 | Swan et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7966405 | Sundaresan et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7969950 | Iyer et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970350 | Sheynman | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970426 | Poe et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7974624 | Gallagher et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7975184 | Goff et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7978627 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7978686 | Goyal et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7979069 | Hupp et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7979889 | Gladstone et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7979896 | McMurtry et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7984130 | Bogineni et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7984511 | Kocher et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7986935 | D'Souza et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7987496 | Bryce et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987510 | Kocher et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7990049 | Shioya | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000276 | Scherzer et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000318 | Wiley et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005009 | McKee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005459 | Balsillie | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005726 | Bao | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8005913 | Carlander | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8005988 | Maes | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010080 | Thenthiruperai et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8010081 | Roskowski | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8010082 | Sutaria et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010990 | Ferguson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015133 | Wu et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8015234 | Lum et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019687 | Wang et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019820 | Son et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019846 | Roelens et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019868 | Rao et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019886 | Harrang et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8023425 | Raleigh | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024397 | Erickson et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8024424 | Freimuth et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027339 | Short et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8031601 | Feroz et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8032168 | Ikaheimo | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8032409 | Mikurak | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8032899 | Archer et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8036387 | Kudelski et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8036600 | Garrett et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044792 | Orr et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8045973 | Chambers | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046449 | Yoshiuchi | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050275 | Iyer | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8050690 | Neeraj | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8050705 | Sicher et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8059530 | Cole | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8060017 | Schlicht et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060463 | Spiegel | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8064418 | Maki | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8064896 | Bell et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065365 | Saxena et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8068824 | Shan et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8068829 | Lemond et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073427 | Koch et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8073721 | Lewis | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8078140 | Baker et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8078163 | Lemond et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8085808 | Brusca et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086398 | Sanchez et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086497 | Oakes, III | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8086791 | Caulkins | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8090359 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8090361 | Hagan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8090616 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8091087 | Ali et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094551 | Huber et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8095112 | Chow et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8095124 | Balia | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8095640 | Guingo et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8095666 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8098579 | Ray et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099077 | Chowdhury et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099517 | Jia et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8102814 | Rahman et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103285 | Kalhan | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8104080 | Burns et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8107953 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108520 | Ruutu et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108680 | Murray | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8112435 | Epstein et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8116223 | Tian et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8116749 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8116781 | Chen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8122128 | Burke, II et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8122249 | Falk et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8125897 | Ray et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126123 | Cai et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126396 | Bennett | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126476 | Vardi et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126722 | Robb et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8130793 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131256 | Martti et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131281 | Hildner et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8131840 | Denker | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8131858 | Agulnik et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8132256 | Bari | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134954 | Godfrey et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8135388 | Gailloux et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8135392 | Marcellino et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8135657 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140690 | Ly et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8144591 | Ghai et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145194 | Yoshikawa et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8146142 | Lortz et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149748 | Bata et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8149823 | Turcan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150394 | Bianconi et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150431 | Wolovitz et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8151205 | Follmann et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8155155 | Chow et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8155620 | Wang et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8155666 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8155670 | Fullam et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8156206 | Kiley et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8159520 | Dhanoa et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8160015 | Rashid et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160056 | Van der Merwe et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160554 | Gosselin | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160555 | Gosselin | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160556 | Gosselin | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160598 | Savoor | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165576 | Raju et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166040 | Brindisi et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166554 | John | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170553 | Bennett | May 2012 | B2 |
8174378 | Richman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8174970 | Adamczyk et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8175574 | Panda et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8180333 | Wells et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8180881 | Seo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180886 | Overcash et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8184530 | Swan et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8184590 | Rosenblatt | May 2012 | B2 |
8185088 | Klein et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185093 | Jheng et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185127 | Cai et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8185152 | Goldner | May 2012 | B1 |
8185158 | Tamura et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190087 | Fisher et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190122 | Alexander et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8190675 | Tribbett | May 2012 | B2 |
8191106 | Choyi et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8191116 | Gazzard | May 2012 | B1 |
8191124 | Wynn et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8194549 | Huber et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8194553 | Liang et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8194572 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8194581 | Schroeder et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8195093 | Garrett et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8195153 | Frencel et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8195163 | Gisby et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8195661 | Kalavade | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8196199 | Hrastar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200163 | Hoffman | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200200 | Belser et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8200509 | Kenedy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200775 | Moore | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200818 | Freund et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204190 | Bang et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204505 | Jin et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204794 | Peng et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8208788 | Ando et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8208919 | Kotecha | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8213296 | Shannon et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8213363 | Ying et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8214536 | Zhao | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8214890 | Kirovski et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8219134 | Maharajh et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8223655 | Heinz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8223741 | Bartlett et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8224382 | Bultman | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8224773 | Spiegel | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8228818 | Chase et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229394 | Karlberg | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229914 | Ramer et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8230061 | Hassan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233433 | Kalhan | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233883 | De Froment | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233895 | Tysowski | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234583 | Sloo et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8238287 | Gopi et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8239520 | Grah | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8242959 | Mia et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8244241 | Montemurro | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8249601 | Emberson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8254880 | Aaltonen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8254915 | Kozisek | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255515 | Melman et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8255534 | Assadzadeh | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255689 | Kim et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8259692 | Bajko | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264965 | Dolganow et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8265004 | Toutonghi | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266249 | Hu | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266681 | Deshpande et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8270955 | Ramer et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8270972 | Otting et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271025 | Brisebois et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271045 | Parolkar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271049 | Silver et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271992 | Chatley et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275415 | Huslak | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275830 | Raleigh | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8279067 | Berger et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8279864 | Wood | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8280351 | Ahmed et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8280354 | Smith et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8284740 | O'Connor | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8285249 | Baker et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8285992 | Mathur et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291238 | Ginter et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291439 | Jethi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296404 | McDysan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8300575 | Willars | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301513 | Peng et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8306518 | Gailloux | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8306741 | Tu | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8307067 | Ryan | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8307095 | Clark et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8310943 | Mehta et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315198 | Corneille et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315593 | Gallant et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315594 | Mauser et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8315718 | Caffrey et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315999 | Chatley et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8320244 | Muqattash et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8320902 | Moring et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8320949 | Matta | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8325638 | Jin et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8325906 | Fullarton et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8326319 | Davis | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8326359 | Kauffman | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8326828 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8331223 | Hill et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8331293 | Sood | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8332375 | Chatley et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8332517 | Russell | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8335161 | Foottit et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8339991 | Biswas et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8340625 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8340628 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8340678 | Pandey | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8340718 | Colonna et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8346210 | Balsan et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8346923 | Rowles et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8347104 | Pathiyal | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8347362 | Cai et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8347378 | Merkin et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8350700 | Fast et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8351592 | Freeny, Jr. et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8351898 | Raleigh | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8352360 | De Judicibus et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8352630 | Hart | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8352980 | Howcroft | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8353001 | Herrod | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8355570 | Karsanbhai et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8355696 | Olding et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8356336 | Johnston et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358638 | Scherzer et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358975 | Bahl et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8363658 | Delker et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8363799 | Gruchala et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364089 | Phillips | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364806 | Short et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8369274 | Sawai | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8370477 | Short et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8370483 | Choong et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8374090 | Morrill et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8374592 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8375128 | Tofighbakhsh et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8375136 | Roman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8379847 | Bell et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380247 | Engstrom | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380804 | Jain | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8385199 | Coward et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8385896 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8385964 | Haney | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8385975 | Forutanpour et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386386 | Zhu | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8391262 | Maki et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8391834 | Raleigh | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8392982 | Harris et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8396458 | Raleigh | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8396929 | Helfman et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401906 | Ruckart | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401968 | Schattauer et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8402165 | Deu-Ngoc et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402540 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8406427 | Chand et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8406736 | Das et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407472 | Hao et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407763 | Weller et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8411587 | Curtis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8411691 | Aggarwal | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8412798 | Wang | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8413245 | Kraemer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8418168 | Tyhurst et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8422988 | Keshav | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8423016 | Buckley et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429403 | Moret et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8437734 | Ray et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8441955 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8442015 | Behzad et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8446831 | Kwan et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8447324 | Shuman et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8447607 | Weider et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8447980 | Godfrey et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448015 | Gerhart | May 2013 | B2 |
8452858 | Wu et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8461958 | Saenz et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8463194 | Erlenback et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8463232 | Tuli et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8468337 | Gaur et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8472371 | Bari et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8477778 | Lehmann, Jr. et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8483135 | Cai et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8483694 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8484327 | Werner et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8484568 | Rados et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8488597 | Nie et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8489110 | Frank et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8489720 | Morford et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8494559 | Malmi | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8495181 | Venkatraman et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8495227 | Kaminsky et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8495360 | Falk et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8495700 | Shahbazi | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8495743 | Kraemer et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499087 | Hu | Jul 2013 | B2 |
RE44412 | Naqvi et al. | Aug 2013 | E |
8500533 | Lutnick et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8503358 | Hanson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8503455 | Heikens | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8504032 | Lott et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8504574 | Dvorak et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8504687 | Maffione et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8504690 | Shah et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8504729 | Pezzutti | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8505073 | Taglienti et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8509082 | Heinz et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8514927 | Sundararajan et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516552 | Raleigh | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520589 | Bhatt et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520595 | Yadav et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8521110 | Rofougaran | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8521775 | Poh et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8522039 | Klyndman et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8522249 | Beaule | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8522337 | Adusumilli et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523547 | Pekrul | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8526329 | Mahany et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8526350 | Xue et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8527410 | Markki et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8527662 | Biswas et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8528068 | Weglein et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8531954 | McNaughton et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8531995 | Khan et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8532610 | Manning Cassell et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533341 | Aguirre et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533775 | Alcorn et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535160 | Lutnick et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8538394 | Zimmerman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8538421 | Brisebois et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8538458 | Haney | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8539544 | Garimella et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8539561 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543265 | Ekhaguere et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543814 | Laitinen et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544105 | Mclean et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8548427 | Chow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548428 | Raleigh | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8549173 | Wu et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8554876 | Winsor | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559369 | Barkan | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561138 | Rothman et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565746 | Hoffman | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8566236 | Busch | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571474 | Chavez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571501 | Miller et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571598 | Valavi | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571993 | Kocher et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572117 | Rappaport | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572256 | Babbar | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583499 | De Judicibus et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588240 | Ramankutty et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589955 | Roundtree et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594665 | Anschutz | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8595186 | Mandyam et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8600895 | Felsher | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8601125 | Huang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8605691 | Soomro et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611919 | Barnes, Jr. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615507 | Varadarajulu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8619735 | Montemurro et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620257 | Qiu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620281 | Gosselin | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621056 | Coussemaeker et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630314 | York | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631428 | Scott et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634425 | Gorti et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8635164 | Rosenhaft et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639215 | McGregor et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8644702 | Kalajan | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8644813 | Gailloux et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8645518 | David | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8654952 | Wang | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8655357 | Gazzard et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8656472 | McMurtry et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8660853 | Robb et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8666395 | Silver | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8667542 | Bertz et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8670334 | Keohane et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8670752 | Fan et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8675507 | Raleigh | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8675852 | Maes | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8676682 | Kalliola | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8676925 | Liu et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8693323 | McDysan | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8694772 | Kao et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700729 | Dua | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8701015 | Bonnat | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8705361 | Venkataraman et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8706863 | Fadell | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713535 | Malhotra et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713641 | Pagan et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8719397 | Levi et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8719423 | Wyld | May 2014 | B2 |
8725700 | Rappaport | May 2014 | B2 |
8725899 | Short et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8730842 | Collins et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8731519 | Flynn et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732808 | Sewall et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8739035 | Trethewey | May 2014 | B2 |
8744339 | Halfmann et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8761711 | Grignani et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8761809 | Faith et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8780857 | Balasubramanian et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787249 | Giaretta et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793304 | Lu et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804517 | Oerton | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8804695 | Branam | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8811338 | Jin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8811991 | Jain et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812525 | Taylor, III | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8818394 | Bienas et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819253 | Simeloff et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8825109 | Montemurro et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8826411 | Moen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831561 | Sutaria et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8837322 | Venkataramanan et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838686 | Getchius | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838752 | Lor et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843849 | Neil et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8845415 | Lutnick et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849297 | Balasubramanian | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855620 | Sievers et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8862751 | Faccin et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8863111 | Selitser et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868725 | Samba | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868727 | Yumerefendi et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875042 | LeJeune et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8880047 | Konicek et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8891483 | Connelly et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8898748 | Burks et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8908516 | Tzamaloukas et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8929374 | Tönsing et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8930238 | Coffman et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8943551 | Ganapathy et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8948726 | Smith et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8949382 | Cornett et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8949597 | Reeves et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8955038 | Nicodemus et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8966018 | Bugwadia et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971841 | Menezes et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8971912 | Chou et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8977284 | Reed | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995952 | Baker et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9002342 | Tenhunen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9008653 | Sparks | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014973 | Ruckart | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015331 | Lai et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9030934 | Shah et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9032427 | Gallant et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9049010 | Jueneman et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064275 | Lu et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9105031 | Shen et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9107053 | Davis | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9111088 | Ghai et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9135037 | Petrescu-Prahova et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9137286 | Yuan | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9172553 | Dawes et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9173090 | Tuchman et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9177455 | Remer | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183524 | Carter | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9262370 | Hofstaedter et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9282460 | Souissi | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9286469 | Kraemer et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9286604 | Aabye et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9288276 | Adamczyk et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9313708 | Nam et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9325737 | Gutowski et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9326173 | Luft | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9344557 | Gruchala et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9363285 | Kitamura | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9367680 | Mahaffey et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9402254 | Kneckt et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9413546 | Meier et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9418381 | Ahuja et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9501803 | Bilac et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9589117 | Ali et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9609459 | Raleigh | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9615192 | Raleigh | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9634850 | Taft et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9923790 | Patel | Mar 2018 | B2 |
20010048738 | Baniak et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053694 | Igarashi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013844 | Garrett et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022472 | Wailer et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022483 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049074 | Eisinger et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020099848 | Lee | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116338 | Gonthier et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120370 | Parupudi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120540 | Kende et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131404 | Mehta et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138599 | Dilman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138601 | Piponius et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154751 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161601 | Nauer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164983 | Raviv et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176377 | Hamilton | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188732 | Buckman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191573 | Whitehill et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199001 | Wenocur et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004937 | Salmenkaita et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005112 | Krautkremer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013434 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018524 | Fishman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028623 | Hennessey et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046396 | Richter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050070 | Mashinsky et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050837 | Kim | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084321 | Tarquini et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088671 | Klinker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030133408 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134650 | Sundar et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159030 | Evans | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161265 | Cao et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171112 | Lupper et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182420 | Jones et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182435 | Redlich et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184793 | Pineau | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030188006 | Bard | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030188117 | Yoshino et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220984 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224781 | Milford et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233332 | Keeler et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236745 | Hartsell et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019539 | Raman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019564 | Goldthwaite et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021697 | Beaton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024756 | Rickard | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030705 | Bowman-Amuah | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039792 | Nakanishi | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044623 | Wake | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040047358 | Chen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054779 | Takeshima et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073672 | Fascenda | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082346 | Skytt et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098715 | Aghera et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102182 | Reith et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103193 | Pandya et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107360 | Herrmann et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116140 | Babbar et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127200 | Shaw et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127208 | Nair et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127256 | Goldthwaite et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040132427 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133668 | Nicholas, III | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137890 | Kalke | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165596 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167958 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168052 | Clisham et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040170191 | Guo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176104 | Arcens | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198331 | Coward et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203755 | Brunet et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203833 | Rathunde et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225561 | Hertzberg et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225898 | Frost et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236547 | Rappaport et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243680 | Mayer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243992 | Gustafson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249918 | Sunshine | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255145 | Chow | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259534 | Chaudhari et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260766 | Barros et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267872 | Serdy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007993 | Chambers et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009499 | Koster | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021995 | Lal et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050041617 | Huotari et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048950 | Morper | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055291 | Bevente et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055309 | Williams et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055595 | Frazer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060266 | Demello et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060525 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075115 | Corneille et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050079863 | Macaluso | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091505 | Riley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096024 | Bicker et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097516 | Donnelly et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107091 | Vannithamby et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108075 | Douglis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111463 | Leung et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128967 | Scobbie | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135264 | Popoff et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050163320 | Brown et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166043 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050183143 | Anderholm et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186948 | Gallagher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198377 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216421 | Barry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228985 | Ylikoski et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238046 | Hassan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239447 | Holzman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245241 | Durand et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246282 | Naslund et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250508 | Guo et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250536 | Deng et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050254435 | Moakley et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266825 | Clayton | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050266880 | Gupta | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014519 | Marsh et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019632 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020787 | Choyi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026679 | Zakas | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030306 | Kuhn | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034256 | Addagatla et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035631 | White et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040642 | Boris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045245 | Aaron et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048223 | Lee et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068796 | Millen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072451 | Ross | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060072550 | Davis et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060072646 | Feher | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075506 | Sanda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085543 | Hrastar et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095517 | O'Connor et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098627 | Karaoguz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060099970 | Morgan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101507 | Camenisch | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112016 | Ishibashi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114821 | Willey et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060114832 | Hamilton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126562 | Liu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135144 | Jothipragasam | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136882 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143066 | Calabria | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143098 | Lazaridis | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156398 | Ross et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060160536 | Chou | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165060 | Dua | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168128 | Sistla et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173959 | Mckelvie et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174035 | Tufail | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178917 | Merriam et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178918 | Mikurak | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182137 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183462 | Kolehmainen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190314 | Hernandez | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190987 | Ohta et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193280 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199608 | Dunn et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200663 | Thornton | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206709 | Labrou et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206904 | Watkins et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218395 | Maes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233108 | Krishnan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233166 | Bou-Diab et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236095 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242685 | Heard et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258341 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277590 | Limont et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291419 | McConnell et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291477 | Croak et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005795 | Gonzalez | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019670 | Falardeau | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022289 | Alt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025301 | Petersson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033194 | Srinivas et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033197 | Scherzer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036312 | Cai et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055694 | Ruge et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060200 | Boris et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061243 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061800 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061878 | Hagiu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073899 | Judge et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076616 | Ngo et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093243 | Kapadekar et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100981 | Adamczyk et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070101426 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070104126 | Calhoun et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109983 | Shankar et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111740 | Wandel | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124077 | Hedlund | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130283 | Klein et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130315 | Friend et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140113 | Gemelos | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140145 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140275 | Bowman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143824 | Shahbazi | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147317 | Smith et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147324 | McGary | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070155365 | Kim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165630 | Rasanen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168499 | Chu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171856 | Bruce et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174490 | Choi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191006 | Carpenter | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192460 | Choi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198656 | Mazzaferri et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201502 | Abramson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213054 | Han | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220251 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226225 | Yiu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226775 | Andreasen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234402 | Khosravi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242659 | Cantu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243862 | Coskun et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248100 | Zuberi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070254646 | Sokondar | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070254675 | Zorlu Ozer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255769 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255797 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255848 | Sewall et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257767 | Beeson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070259656 | Jeong | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070259673 | Willars et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263558 | Salomone | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266422 | Germano et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274327 | Kaarela et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280453 | Kelley | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282896 | Wydroug et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293191 | Mir et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294395 | Strub et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294410 | Pandya et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297378 | Poyhonen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070298764 | Clayton | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299965 | Nieh et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300252 | Acharya et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005285 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005561 | Brown et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010379 | Zhao | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010452 | Holtzman et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018494 | Waite et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022354 | Grewal et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025230 | Patel et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032715 | Jia et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034063 | Yee | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034419 | Mullick et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039102 | Sewall et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049630 | Kozisek et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080050715 | Golczewski et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051076 | O'Shaughnessy et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052387 | Heinz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056273 | Pelletier et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059474 | Lim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059743 | Bychkov et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060066 | Wynn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062900 | Rao | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064367 | Math et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066149 | Lim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066150 | Lim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066181 | Haveson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070550 | Hose | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077705 | Li et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080457 | Cole | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080081606 | Cole | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082643 | Storrie et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083013 | Soliman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080085707 | Fadell | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089295 | Keeler et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089303 | Wirtanen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095339 | Elliott et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080096559 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098062 | Balia | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109679 | Wright et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120129 | Seubert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120668 | Yau | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120688 | Qiu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125079 | O'Neil et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126287 | Cox et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127304 | Ginter et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130534 | Tomioka | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130656 | Kim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080132201 | Karlberg | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080132268 | Choi-Grogan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134330 | Kapoor et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139210 | Gisby et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147454 | Walker et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160958 | Abichandani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162637 | Adamczyk et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162704 | Poplett et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164304 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166993 | Gautier et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167027 | Gautier et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167033 | Beckers | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168275 | DeAtley et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168523 | Ansari et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177998 | Apsangi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178300 | Brown et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183811 | Kotras et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183812 | Paul et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184127 | Rafey et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189760 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201266 | Chua et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080207167 | Bugenhagen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212470 | Castaneda et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080212751 | Chung | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219268 | Dennison | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221951 | Stanforth et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222692 | Andersson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225748 | Khemani et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229385 | Feder et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229388 | Maes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235511 | O'Brien et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240373 | Wilhelm | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250053 | Aaltonen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256593 | Vinberg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259924 | Gooch et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262798 | Kim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263348 | Zaltsman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268813 | Maes | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270212 | Blight et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279216 | Sharif-Ahmadi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282319 | Fontijn et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293395 | Mathews et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298230 | Luft et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080305793 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080311885 | Dawson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313315 | Karaoguz et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313730 | Iftimie et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316923 | Fedders et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318547 | Ballou et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318550 | DeAtley | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319879 | Carroll et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320497 | Tarkoma et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005000 | Baker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005005 | Forstall et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006116 | Baker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006200 | Baker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006229 | Sweeney et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013157 | Beaule | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016310 | Rasal | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036111 | Danford et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090042536 | Bernard et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044185 | Krivopaltsev | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046707 | Smires et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046723 | Rahman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090047989 | Harmon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048913 | Shenfield et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049156 | Aronsson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049518 | Roman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054030 | Golds | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090065571 | Jain | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067372 | Shah et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090068984 | Burnett | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070379 | Rappaport | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077622 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079699 | Sun | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090113514 | Hu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125619 | Antani | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132860 | Liu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149154 | Bhasin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157792 | Fiatal | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163173 | Williams | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172077 | Roxburgh et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180391 | Petersen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090181662 | Fleischman et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090197585 | Aaron | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090197612 | Kiiskinen | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203352 | Fordon et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217364 | Salmela et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090219170 | Clark et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248883 | Suryanarayana et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254857 | Romine et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257379 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271514 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282127 | Leblanc et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090286507 | O'Neil et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287921 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288140 | Huber et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291665 | Gaskarth et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299857 | Brubaker | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307696 | Vals et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307746 | Di et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315735 | Bhavani et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320110 | Nicolson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017506 | Fadell | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020822 | Zerillo et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027469 | Gurajala et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100027559 | Lin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030890 | Dutta et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041364 | Lott et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041365 | Lott et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042675 | Fujii | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100043068 | Varadhan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069074 | Kodialam et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071053 | Ansari et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100075666 | Garner | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100080202 | Hanson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082431 | Ramer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103820 | Fuller et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113020 | Subramanian et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121744 | Belz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131584 | Johnson | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142478 | Forssell et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100144310 | Bedingfield | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100151866 | Karpov et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153781 | Hanna | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167696 | Smith et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188975 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188990 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188992 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188994 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100190469 | Vanderveen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191576 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191612 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191846 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192170 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192212 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195503 | Raleigh | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100197268 | Raleigh | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198698 | Raleigh et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198939 | Raleigh | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100227632 | Bell et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235329 | Koren et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241544 | Benson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248719 | Scholaert | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100284327 | Miklos | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284388 | Fantini et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287599 | He et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100311402 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318652 | Samba | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325420 | Kanekar | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004917 | Salsa et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013569 | Scherzer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019574 | Malomsoky et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110081881 | Baker et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110082790 | Baker et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110309 | Bennett | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126141 | King et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145920 | Mahaffey et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159818 | Scherzer et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173678 | Kaippallimalil et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177811 | Heckman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110195700 | Kukuchka et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238545 | Fanaian et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241624 | Park et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252430 | Chapman et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264923 | Kocher et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277019 | Pritchard, Jr. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120020296 | Scherzer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029718 | Davis | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120108225 | Luna et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144025 | Melander et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155296 | Kashanian | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166364 | Ahmad et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166604 | Fortier et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120196644 | Scherzer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238287 | Scherzer | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120330792 | Kashanian | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130024914 | Ahmed et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029653 | Baker et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030960 | Kashanian | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130058274 | Scherzer et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130065555 | Baker et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130072177 | Ross et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130084835 | Scherzer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130095787 | Kashanian | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130117140 | Kashanian | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144789 | Aaltonen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130326356 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2013 | A9 |
20140073291 | Hildner et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140241342 | Constantinof | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150181628 | Haverinen et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2688553 | Dec 2008 | CA |
1310401 | Aug 2001 | CN |
1345154 | Apr 2002 | CN |
1508734 | Jun 2004 | CN |
1538730 | Oct 2004 | CN |
1567818 | Jan 2005 | CN |
101035308 | Mar 2006 | CN |
1801829 | Jul 2006 | CN |
1802839 | Jul 2006 | CN |
1889777 | Jul 2006 | CN |
101155343 | Sep 2006 | CN |
1867024 | Nov 2006 | CN |
1878160 | Dec 2006 | CN |
1937511 | Mar 2007 | CN |
101123553 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101080055 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101115248 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101127988 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101183958 | May 2008 | CN |
101335666 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101341764 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101815275 | Aug 2010 | CN |
1098490 | May 2001 | EP |
1289326 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1463238 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1503548 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1545114 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1739518 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1772988 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1850575 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1887732 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1942698 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1978772 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2007065 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2026514 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2466831 | Jun 2012 | EP |
3148713 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2005339247 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006041989 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006155263 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006197137 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006344007 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007318354 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008301121 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009111919 | May 2009 | JP |
2009212707 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2009218773 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2009232107 | Oct 2009 | JP |
20040053858 | Jun 2004 | KR |
1998058505 | Dec 1998 | WO |
1999027723 | Jun 1999 | WO |
1999065185 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0208863 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2002045315 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2002067616 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002093877 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2003014891 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2003017063 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2003017065 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2003058880 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004028070 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004064306 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004077797 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004095753 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005008995 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005053335 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005083934 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006004467 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006004784 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006012610 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006050758 | May 2006 | WO |
2006073837 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006077481 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006093961 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006120558 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006130960 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007001833 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007014630 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007018363 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007053848 | May 2007 | WO |
2007068288 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007069245 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007097786 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007107701 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007120310 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2007124279 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007126352 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007129180 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007133844 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008017837 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008051379 | May 2008 | WO |
2008066419 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008080139 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008080430 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008099802 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009008817 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009091295 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010088413 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010128391 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011002450 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011149532 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Ads and movies on the run,” the Gold Coast Bulletin, Southport, Qld, Jan. 29, 2008. |
“ASA/PIX: Allow Split Tunneling for VPN Clients on the ASA Configuration Example,” Document ID 70917, Jan. 10, 2008. |
“Communication Concepts for Mobile Agent Systems,” by Joachim Baumann et al.; Inst. Of Parallel and Distributed High-Performance Systems, Univ. of Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 123-135, 1997. |
“End to End QoS Solution for Real-time Multimedia Application;” Computer Engineering and Applications, 2007, 43 (4): 155-159, by Tan Zu-guo, Wang Wen-juan; Information and Science School, Zhanjian Normal College, Zhan jiang, Guangdong 524048, China. |
“Jentro Technologies launches Zenlet platform to accelerate location-based content delivery to mobile devices,” The Mobile Internet, Boston, MA, Feb. 2008. |
“The Construction of Intelligent Residential District in Use of Cable Television Network,” Shandong Science, vol. 13, No. 2, Jun. 2000. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Access Network Discovery and Selection Function (ANDSF) Management Object (MO),” Release 9, Document No. 3GPP TS 24.312, V9.1.0, Mar. 2010. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) Enhancements for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) Access,” Release 8, Document No. 3GPP TS 23.401, V8.4.0, Dec. 2008. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and Charging Control Architecture,” Release 8, Document No. 3GPP TS 23.203, V8.4.0, Dec. 2008. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project; “Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; IP Flow Mobility and seamless WLAN offlload; Stage 2,” Release 10, Document No. 3GPP TS 23.261, V1.0.0, Mar. 2010. |
Accuris Networks, “The Business Value of Mobile Data Offload—a White Paper”, 2010. |
Ahmed et al., “A Context-Aware Vertical Handover Decision Algorithm for Multimode Mobile Terminals and Its Performance,” BenQ Mobile, Munich Germany; University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria; 2006. |
Ahmed et al., “Multi Access Data Network Connectivity and IP Flow Mobility in Evolved Packet System (EPS),” 2010 IEEE. |
Alonistioti et al., “Intelligent Architectures Enabling Flexible Service Provision and Adaptability,” 2002. |
Amazon Technologies, Inc., “Kindle™ User's Guide,” 3rd Edition, Copyright 2004-2009. |
Android Cupcake excerpts, The Android Open Source Project, Feb. 10, 2009. |
Anton, B. et al., “Best Current Practices for Wireless Internet Service Provider (WISP) Roaming”; Release Date Feb. 2003, Version 1.0; Wi-Fi Alliance—Wireless ISP Roaming (WISPr). |
Blackberry Mobile Data System, version 4.1, Technical Overview, 2006. |
Chandrasekhar et al., “Femtocell Networks: A Survey,” Jun. 28, 2008. |
Chaouchi et al., “Policy Based Networking in the Integration Effort of 4G Networks and Services,” 2004 IEEE. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Mobile Exchange (CMX) Solution Guide: Chapter 2—Overview of GSM, GPRS, and UMTS,” Nov. 4, 2008. |
Client Guide for Symantec Endpoint Protection and Symantec Network Access Control, 2007. |
Dikaiakos et al., “A Distributed Middleware Infrastructure for Personalized Services,” Nov. 24, 2003. |
Dixon et al., Triple Play Digital Services: Comcast and Verizon (Digital Phone, Television, and Internet), Aug. 2007. |
Ehnert, “Small application to monitor IP trafic on a Blackberry—1.01.03 ”, Mar. 27, 2008; http://www.ehnert.net/MiniMoni/. |
European Commission, “Data Roaming Tariffs—Transparency Measures,” obtained from Europa—Europe's Information Society Thematic Portal website, Jun. 24, 2011: “http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/roaming/data/measures/index_en.htm.” |
Farooq et al., “An IEEE 802.16 WiMax Module for the NS-3 Simulator,” Mar. 2-6, 2009. |
Fujitsu, “Server Push Technology Survey and Bidirectional Communication in HTTP Browser,” Jan. 9, 2008 (JP). |
Han et al., “Information Collection Services for Qos-Aware Mobile Applications,” 2005. |
Hartmann et al., “Agent-Based Banking Transactions & Information Retrieval—What About Performance Issues?” 1999. |
Hewlett-Packard Development Company, LP, “IP Multimedia Services Charging,” white paper, Jan. 2006. |
Hossain et al., “Gain-Based Selection of Ambient Media Services in Pervasive Environments,” Mobile Networks and Applications. Oct. 3, 2008. |
Jing et al., “Client-Server Computing in Mobile Environments,” GTE Labs. Inc., Purdue University, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 31, No. 2, Jun. 1999. |
Kasper et al., “Subscriber Authentication in mobile cellular Networks with virtual software SIM Credentials using Trusted Computing,” Fraunhofer—Institute for Secure Information Technology SIT, Darmstadt, Germany; ICACT 2008. |
Kassar et al., “An overview of vertical handover decision strategies in heterogeneous wireless networks,” ScienceDirect, University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France, Jun. 5, 2007. |
Kim, “Free wireless a high-wire act; MetroFi needs to draw enough ads to make service add profits,” San Francisco Chronicle, Aug. 21, 2006. |
Knight et al., “Layer 2 and 3 Virtual Private Networks: Taxonomy, Technology, and Standarization Efforts,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Jun. 2004. |
Koutsopoulou et al., “Charging, Accounting and Billing Management Schemes in Mobile Telecommunication Networks and the Internet,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, First Quarter 2004, vol. 6, No. 1. |
Koutsopoulou et al., “Middleware Platform for the Support of Charging Reconfiguration Actions,” 2005. |
Kuntze et al., “Trustworthy content push,” Fraunhofer—Institute for Secure Information Technology SIT; Germany; WCNC 2007 proceedings, IEEE. |
Kyriakakos et al., “Ubiquitous Service Provision in Next Generation Mobile Networks,” Proceedings of the 13th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit, Lyon, France, Jun. 2004. |
Li, Yu, “Dedicated E-Reading Device: The State of the Art and the Challenges,” Scroll, vol. 1, No. 1, 2008. |
Loopt User Guide, metroPCS, Jul. 17, 2008. |
Muntermann et al., “Potentials und Sicherheitsanforderungen mobiler Finanzinformationsdienste und deren Systeminfrastrukturen,” Chair of Mobile Commerce & Multilateral Security, Goethe Univ. Frankfurt, 2004. |
NetLimiter Lite 4.0.19.0; http://www.heise.de/download/netlimiter-lite-3617703.html from vol. 14/2007. |
Nilsson et al., “A Novel MAC Scheme for Solving the QoS Parameter Adjustment Problem in IEEE802.11e EDCA,” Feb. 2006. |
Nuzman et al., “A compund model for TCP connection arrivals for LAN and WAN applications,” Oct. 22, 2002. |
Open Mobile Alliance (OMA), Push Architecture, Candidate Version 2.2; Oct. 2, 2007; OMA-AD-Push-V2_2-20071002-C. |
Oppliger, Rolf, “Internet Security: Firewalls and Bey,” Communications of the ACM, May 1997, vol. 40. No. 5. |
Quintana, David, “Mobile Multitasking,” Apr. 14, 2010. |
Rao et al., “Evolution of Mobile Location-Based Services,” Communication of the ACM, Dec. 2003. |
Richtel, “Cellphone consumerism; If even a debit card is too slow, now you have a new way to act on impulse: [National Edition],” National Post, Canada, Oct. 2, 2007. |
Rivadeneyra et al., “A communication architecture to access data services through GSM,” San Sebastian, Spain, 1998. |
Roy et al., “Energy Management in Mobile Devices with the Cinder Operating System”, Stanford University, MIT CSAIL, Jun. 3, 2010. |
Ruckus Wireless—White Paper; “Smarter Wi-Fi for Mobile Operator Infrastructures” 2010. |
Sabat, “The evolving mobile wireless value chain and market structure,” Nov. 2002. |
Sadeh et al., “Understanding and Capturing People's Privacy Policies in a Mobile Social Networking Application,” ISR School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2007. |
Schiller et al., “Location-Based Services,” The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems, 2004. |
Steglich, Stephan, “I-Centric User Interaction,” Nov. 21, 2003. |
Sun et al., “Towards Connectivity Management Adaptability: Context Awareness in Policy Representation and End-to-end Evaluation Algorithm,” Dept. of Electrical and Information Engineering, Univ. of Oulu, Finland, 2004. |
Thurston, Richard, “WISPr 2.0 Boosts Roaming Between 3G and Wi-Fi”; Jun. 23, 2010; Web page from zdnet.com; Zdnet.com/wispr-2-0-boosts-roaming-between-3g-and-wi-fi-3040089325/. |
Van Eijk, et al., “GigaMobile, Agent Technology for Designing Personalized Mobile Service Brokerage,” Jul. 1, 2002. |
VerizonWireless.com news, “Verizon Wireless Adds to Portfolio of Cosumer-Friendly Tools With Introduction of Usage Controls, Usage Controls and Chaperone 2.0 Offer Parents Full Family Security Solution,” Aug. 18, 2008. |
Windows7 Power Management, published Apr. 2009. |
Wireless Broadband Alliance, “WISPr 2.0, Apr. 8, 2010”; Doc. Ref. No. WBA/RM/WISPr, Version 01.00. |
Zhu et al., “A Survey of Quality of Service in IEEE 802.11 Networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications, Aug. 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190261437 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61206354 | Jan 2009 | US | |
61206944 | Feb 2009 | US | |
61207393 | Feb 2009 | US | |
61207739 | Feb 2009 | US | |
61206354 | Jan 2009 | US | |
61206944 | Feb 2009 | US | |
61207393 | Feb 2009 | US | |
61207739 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13248028 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14578124 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15287603 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 16132643 | US | |
Parent | 14578124 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 15287603 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12380778 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 13248028 | US | |
Parent | 12380780 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 12380778 | US |