The present invention relates generally to a document inserting systems, which assemble batches of documents for insertion into envelopes. More particularly, the present invention is directed toward an envelope feeder for serially feeding individual envelopes from a stack of envelopes.
Multi-station document inserting systems generally include a plurality of various stations configured for specific applications. Such machines are known in the art and are generally used by organizations, which produce a large volume of mailings where the content of each mail piece may vary.
In a typical envelope insertion machine for mass mailing, there is a gathering section where the enclosure material is gathered before it is inserted into an envelope. This gathering section includes a gathering transport with pusher fingers rigidly attached to a conveying means and a plurality of enclosure feeders mounted above the transport. If the enclosure material contains many documents, these documents are separately fed by different enclosure feeders. After all the released documents are gathered, they are put into a stack to be inserted into an envelope in an inserting station.
At the same time, envelopes are sequentially fed to the inserting station, and each envelope is placed on a platform with its flap flipped back all the way, so that a plurality of mechanical fingers or a vacuum suction device can keep the envelope on the platform while the throat of the envelope is pulled away to open the envelope.
Before envelopes are fed to the insertion station, they are usually supplied in a stack in a supply tray or envelope hopper. Envelopes are then separated by an envelope feeder so that only one envelope is fed to the insertion station at a time. For that reason, an envelope feeder is also referred to as an envelope singulator. In a high-speed insertion machine, the feeder should be able to feed single envelopes at a rate of approximately 18,000 No. 10 envelopes per hour. At this feeding rate, it is critical that only a single envelope at a time is picked up and delivered to the insertion station.
However, deformed envelopes (cupped or twisted) degrade performance of the feeder. Such deformation can result in slippage that causes the envelopes to be fed too slowly. Slippage may also result, for example, from insufficient pressure on the envelope stack, or from envelopes made from a material that has low friction. A prior solution to this problem involved using a suction cup to assist in feeding the envelopes. However, constant use of the suction cup involves additional risks of misfeeds and jams.
At a feeding period approximately equal to 200 ms, there are roughly 30 ms available for the feeder to reset before the next feed cycle is initiated. If an envelope is not present in close proximity before the next feed time, acquisition of the next envelope will not occur and a feed cycle will be missed, resulting in a reduced machine throughput.
Known envelope feeder systems for an inserter system are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,625, Method for Supplying Envelopes to an Inserter System by Way of Multiple Paths, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,579, Low Friction Envelope Feeder, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
To avoid the problems inherent in the prior art, the proposed solution measures the quality of the feeding and activates the suction cup mechanism only when it is required. Accordingly, the instant invention provides a method for feeding of individual envelopes from a stack. Envelopes are stacked in a hopper, the hopper having an upstream end and a downstream end. At the downstream end of the hopper, a friction feeder serially feeds individual envelopes from the stack. A suction cup is selectively actuated to engage with the envelope to pull a leading portion of the envelope away from the stack to assist the friction feeder in feeding envelopes.
Preferably, vacuum is selectively applied and removed from the suction cup in order to release the envelope for further feeding by the friction feeder. The step of selective actuation is preferably based on monitoring downstream movement of fed envelopes. The suction cup is engaged when the envelopes travel a shorter distance than would be expected based on the movement of the feeder. This difference is based on slippage from poor feeding by friction feeder. The suction cup is engaged when envelopes fail to travel a distance set as a predetermined threshold. Preferably, the suction cup is engaged for a predetermined number of subsequent envelopes after the predetermined threshold is not met.
The above and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout the drawings and in which:
At the downstream end of the hopper 10, the feeder 26 is preferably a friction belt that pulls and singulates envelopes into a driven feed nip formed by rollers 27 and 28. In feeder 26, during every cycle the feed belts separate a single envelope 20 out of the stack 19 and move it into the take away nip rollers 27, 28. Feeder 26 further includes an encoder that tracks the motion of the feeder for each envelope, whereby a nominal transport distance caused by the feeder 26 is known (not taking slippage into account).
A suction cup 30 is positioned proximally to the feeder 26 to assist in feeding of envelopes 20. The suction cup actuator 29 causes the suction cup 30 to move forward to engage the surface of the leading portion of envelope 20. The actuator 29 then pulls the suction cup 30 and the leading portion of envelope 20 away from the stack 19. The vacuum to the suction cup 30 is then cut off by an air valve, as the feeder 26 belt, and take away nip rollers 27,28 feed the singulated envelope 20.
The quality of the feeder 26 performance is measured by comparing the measured feed distance versus the nominal feed distance. The measured feed distance is the distance the feed belts move from starting acceleration to the moment when the leading edge of the envelope 20 arrives at the location of the feed confirm sensor 32 (at this point leading edge of the envelope is downstream from the pinch point of take away nip roller 27, 28). The nominal feed distance is the distance between the bottom wall of the hopper 10 and feed confirm sensor 32. If the feeder 26 is working ideally, the measured feed distance should be the same as the nominal distance. But due to slippage, the distance feed belts travel to the moment the envelope arrives at the feed confirm sensor may be longer than the nominal distance.
In accordance with the improved system described herein, the feed distance is monitored every cycle and compared to a maximum allowed distance for particular material size. If the feed distance is lower than a threshold value the suction cup mechanism 29, 30 stays deactivated. If the feed distance exceeds the threshold value the suction cup mechanism 29, 30 is activated for N consecutive cycles. After N cycles are expired the control algorithm deactivates the suction cup mechanism. āNā is a configurable number that can be set in advance.
Although the invention has been described with respect to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and various other changes, omissions and deviations in the form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4541624 | Sasage | Sep 1985 | A |
4757985 | Hamant | Jul 1988 | A |
5016865 | Ioka | May 1991 | A |
5052672 | Horii | Oct 1991 | A |
5219432 | Delbe | Jun 1993 | A |
5527028 | Ishikawa | Jun 1996 | A |
5899449 | Acquaviva | May 1999 | A |
6176481 | Ohkoda | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6250625 | Janatka | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6425579 | Andreyka | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7926807 | Dahlgren | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20070018377 | Rozenfeld | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1746056 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1746058 | Jan 2007 | EP |
02231329 | Sep 1990 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160244286 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62118571 | Feb 2015 | US |