The present invention relates generally to the control of haptic feedback interface devices that interface a user with a computer device.
Humans interface with electronic and mechanical devices in a variety of applications, and the need for a more natural, easy-to-use, and informative interface is a constant concern. In the context of the present invention, humans interface with computer devices for a variety of applications. One such application is interacting with computer-generated environments such as games, simulations, and application programs. Computer input devices such as mice and trackballs are often used to control a cursor within a graphical environment and provide input in these applications. In portable computer or electronic devices, such as laptop computers or personal digital assistants (PDAs), mice typically have too large a workspace to be practical. A popular device for portable computers are “touchpads,” or touchscreens, which are small rectangular, planar pads that sense the location of a pointing object by any of a variety of sensing technologies.
In some interface devices, haptic feedback is also provided to the user. These types of interface devices can provide physical sensations which are felt by the user manipulating the user object of the interface device. One or more motors or other type of actuators are coupled to the device housing or manipulandum and are connected to the controlling computer system. The computer system controls forces output by the actuators in conjunction and coordination with displayed events. The computer system can thus convey physical force sensations to the user in conjunction with other supplied feedback as the user is grasping or contacting the interface device or manipulatable object.
In many haptic feedback devices, the haptic feedback takes the form of vibrations, jolts, or pulses output on the housing or manipulandum and are thus experienced by the user, referred to as “tactile” sensations herein. For example, many gamepad devices include a spinning eccentric mass that creates inertial vibrations on the housing or object. Other devices, such as the I-Feel Mouse from Logitech Corp., provide inertial vibrations using a linearly-moving mass. Still other devices may vibrate a housing or object by impacting or directly moving the housing or object with the actuator.
One problem with current haptic feedback devices is that tactile sensations output to the user tend to be more effective in particular frequency ranges and are less effective in other frequency ranges, thus causing haptic sensations to feel uneven and inconsistent to the user over broad frequency ranges.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, an amplitude modulator circuit comprises a reference oscillator and an envelope modulator coupled to the reference oscillator for receiving a reference signal. A microcontroller is coupled to the envelope modulator for providing an envelope signal to the envelope modulator and a low pass filter is coupled to the envelope modulator for receiving a modulated command from the envelope modulator. An inverter is coupled to the low pass filter for receiving a low passed envelope modulated signal from the low pass filter and a transducer or amplifier is coupled to the inverter and the low pass filter for receiving an inverted low passed signal and the low passed envelope modulated signal.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the reference oscillator comprises a sine wave generator.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, the envelope modulator comprises a ramp generator circuit.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, the low pass filter is a second order low pass filter.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, a method of amplitude modulation of a resonant frequency sinusoid by a pulse width modulated envelope function comprises providing an envelope wave shape to an envelope modulator, providing a sinusoidal reference signal to the envelope modulator, providing a modulated command from the envelope modulator to a low pass filter, providing a low passed modulated command signal from the low pass filter to an inverter and a transducer or amplified, and providing an inverted low passed modulated command signal from the inverter to the transducer or amplifier passed modulated command signal.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be understood upon reading and understanding the description of the preferred exemplary embodiments, found hereinbelow, in conjunction with reference to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements.
The present invention is an alternative embodiment of an envelope modulation approach referred to in patent application Ser. No. 09/908,184, filed Jul. 17, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. That invention as well as the one described herein, provides methods used to modulate a high frequency signal, suitable for driving a vibrotactile transducer, with a lower frequency signal that contains tactile information. The composite or modulated signal is used to drive an actuator that conveys the lower frequency tactile information to the human user via electrical amplification that drives a transducer, thereby mechanically conveying the tactile information to the user. The high frequency signal oscillates at a frequency that is close to the resonant frequency of the mechanical actuator driven by the transducer, and hence the haptic sensations benefit from mechanical amplification caused by the resonant signal. In patent application Ser. No. 09/908,184, one methodology described is to multiply a resonant frequency sinusoid by the modulating envelope. The amplitude modulated sinusoid then commands an amplifier as a pulse width modulated signal.
A conventional approach requires that the pulse width modulated (PWM) frequency be updated at a high rate in order to accurately conform to a sinusoidal resonant frequency waveform. Deviations from a pure sinusoid generate audible noise in the actuator that detracts from the actuator as a tactile device. A high PWM update rate would be necessary to accurately command a sinusoid that may be in the 100 to 200 Hz range. Such a high update rate would consume significant processor duty cycle and potentially require a more costly processor than with the invention described herein.
The present invention describes amplitude modulation of a resonant frequency sinusoid by a pulse width modulated envelope function to provide strong haptic sensations over a broad frequency range.
A preferred embodiment of the present inventive approach is to use an electronic circuit to perform the envelope modulation function so that the processor only needs to command the envelope wave shape, which is a much lower frequency signal that requires a lower processor update rate. Use of a single electronic circuit reduces costs of the device, since separate components such as op amps or other amplifiers are not required.
The circuit topology of
The second circuit is an envelope modulator 21 that generates a series of pulses at the processor's PWM frequency (for example, nominally 24 kHz) with an amplitude that is proportional to the instantaneous voltage of the reference sinusoid. This circuit is preferably a ramp generator that is reset when the PWM signal is low. When the PWM signal is high, the ramp generator produces a sawtooth output signal with an output voltage that increases linearly in time at a rate that is proportional to the instantaneous voltage of the reference sinusoid. In this way, the circuit produces a series of sawtooth pulses with a width proportional to the PWM duty cycle and height proportional to the instantaneous voltage of the reference sinusoid. The average voltage of the sawtooth signal is therefore the same as a signal that would be produced by directly multiplying the reference sinusoid by the PWM command signal. The sawtooth signal output waveform from this circuit then feeds into the third circuit. An envelope command indicating envelope wave shape is provided by microprocessor 25 at output 26.
The third circuit is a second order low pass filter 22 with a corner frequency that lies between the resonant frequency of the actuator (or mechanical system) and the pulse width modulation frequency of the command signal. The fourth circuit is an inverter 23 that inverts the output of the third circuit. The signals output from the third and fourth circuits constitute a differential drive signal that is modulated at the reference sinusoid frequency and has an amplitude that is proportional to the duty cycle of the commanded PWM signal. This differential drive signal can then drive a piezo transducer directly or be amplified to drive an electric motor (such as a DC motor) or other actuator.
The invention frees the processor from the task of performing the envelope modulation function at a sufficiently high update rate to produce a clean modulated sinusoidal output.
A prototype circuit demonstrated that the circuit was able to drive either one or two piezo transducers, and that a constant frequency sinusoidal waveform was being modulated by the PWM envelope command from a TouchSense processor. The prototype circuit further demonstrated that the generated waveform was exciting an inertially grounded mass/transducer/spring system at its mechanical resonant frequency. The frequency of the sinusoidal driving function was tuned to the resonant frequency of the mechanical system. The tactile sensation felt when touching the mass in the mechanical system conveyed the impression that it was excited at the much lower envelope function frequency rather than the mechanical system's resonant frequency.
The present invention is suitable to drive actuators to provide haptic sensations in a variety of haptic feedback computer interface devices, including mice, joysticks, trackballs, gamepads, remote controls, PDA's, touchpads for laptop computers, touchscreens for a variety of devices, gloves, steering wheels, etc. Some examples of suitable devices and haptic sensations are described in copending application Ser. No. 09/917,263, filed Jul. 26, 2001, entitled, “Haptic Interface for Laptop Computers and Other Portable Devices,” including piezoelectric transducer embodiments, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Other tactile devices and sensations used for inertial tactile feedback, and suitable for use with the present invention, are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,211,861 and 6,088,019 and application Ser. Nos. 09/585,741, and 09/487,737, all incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes. Other interface device embodiments suitable for use with the present invention are described in Ser. Nos. 09/759,780, 60/236,417, and 60/236,558, incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes.
While this invention has been described in terms of preferred exemplary embodiments, there are alterations, modifications, and permutations thereof which fall within the scope of this invention. It should also be noted that the embodiments described above can be combined in various ways in a particular implementation. Furthermore, certain terminology has been used for the purposes of descriptive clarity, and not to limit the present invention.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/309,913 filed Aug. 2, 2001, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/908,184 filed Jul. 17, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2972140 | Hirsch | Feb 1961 | A |
3157853 | Hirsch | Nov 1964 | A |
3220121 | Cutler | Nov 1965 | A |
3497668 | Hirsch | Feb 1970 | A |
3517446 | Corlyon et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3623064 | Kagan | Nov 1971 | A |
3902687 | Hightower | Sep 1975 | A |
3903614 | Diamond et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3911416 | Feder | Oct 1975 | A |
4127752 | Lowthorp | Nov 1978 | A |
4160508 | Salisbury, Jr. | Jul 1979 | A |
4236325 | Hall et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4262549 | Schwellenbach | Apr 1981 | A |
4333070 | Barnes | Jun 1982 | A |
4464117 | Foerst | Aug 1984 | A |
4484191 | Vavra | Nov 1984 | A |
4513235 | Acklam et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4581491 | Boothroyd | Apr 1986 | A |
4599070 | Hladky et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4708656 | de Vries et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4713007 | Alban | Dec 1987 | A |
4771344 | Fallacaro et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4794392 | Selinko | Dec 1988 | A |
4885565 | Embach | Dec 1989 | A |
4891764 | McIntosh | Jan 1990 | A |
4930770 | Baker | Jun 1990 | A |
4934694 | McIntosh | Jun 1990 | A |
5019761 | Kraft | May 1991 | A |
5022384 | Freels | Jun 1991 | A |
5022407 | Horch et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035242 | Franklin et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038089 | Szakaly | Aug 1991 | A |
5078152 | Bond et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5103404 | McIntosh | Apr 1992 | A |
5165897 | Johnson | Nov 1992 | A |
5175459 | Danial et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5186695 | Mangseth et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5212473 | Louis | May 1993 | A |
5240417 | Smithson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5271290 | Fischer | Dec 1993 | A |
5275174 | Cook | Jan 1994 | A |
5283970 | Aigner | Feb 1994 | A |
5299810 | Pierce et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309140 | Everett, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5334027 | Wherlock | Aug 1994 | A |
5388992 | Franklin et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5436622 | Gutman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437607 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5466213 | Hogan et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5547382 | Yamasaki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575761 | Hajianpour | Nov 1996 | A |
5649020 | McClurg et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5684722 | Thorner et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690582 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5734236 | Motegi | Mar 1998 | A |
5766016 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767839 | Rosenberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5785630 | Bobick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5952806 | Muramatsu | Sep 1999 | A |
6088019 | Rosenberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6111577 | Zilles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6160489 | Perry et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6211861 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216059 | Ierymenko | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219034 | Elbing et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6422941 | Thorner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429846 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6697043 | Shahoian | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717573 | Shahoian et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 349 086 | Jan 1990 | EP |
H2-185278 | Jul 1990 | JP |
H4-8381 | Jan 1992 | JP |
H5-192449 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H7-24147 | Jan 1995 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030057934 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60309913 | Aug 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09908184 | Jul 2001 | US |
Child | 10208575 | US |