ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OF CONFINED ANIMAL REARING FACILITIES WITH LIQUID IRON COMPOUNDS

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080075791
  • Publication Number
    20080075791
  • Date Filed
    October 25, 2007
    16 years ago
  • Date Published
    March 27, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
A system is provided for enhancing the environment present in enclosed facilities in which livestock is being reared. The system involves the addition, periodically and in the presence of livestock, of a suitable amount of liquid ferric sulfate or ferric chloride a mixture thereof to non-diluted manure deposits on bedding material or to the livestock manure deposits on floor area where the livestock is confined. The concentration of the ferric compound in the applied liquid is sufficient to maintain a pH of about 7.5 and most preferably between 4.0 and 7.0 in the confined environment and such that it inhibits ammonia volatilization and stabilizes, i.e. insolubilizes any resulting soluble phosphorus generated.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a system for enhancement of conditions prevailing in domestic animal (i.e. livestock) rearing facilities and to the control of environmental effects from the manure generated by such livestock at these facilities. More specifically, the present invention relates to the improvement of the atmospheric environment that is present to which livestock is exposed during the rearing of livestock in substantially confined facilities. In particular, the invention deals with the problem of ammonia volatilization and odors and with soluble phosphorous generated from manure in domestic animal rearing facilities. The invention alleviates the problem by using a treatment comprising applying to the non-diluted manure containing bedding or manure littered floor area, where the animals are confined, a liquid containing ferric sulfate or ferric chloride or mixture thereof.


Various building construction designs are known for housing and for sheltering livestock such as poultry, including chickens, turkeys, ducks, ostrich, and dairy cows in rearing facilities on farms. Conventional enclosure types, for example are such on the kind described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,890,454 comprising a flooring which includes a grate or slatted section to allow manure which accumulates to fall through the flooring opening into a manure collection pit. In such facilities the manure must be periodically cleansed, i.e. removed from the pit. Another type of facility includes an appropriately inclined floor, such as a concrete floor, which has at least one flushing tough or channel defined in the floor. Manure temporarily collects on a portion of the floor and will present a detrimental effect on the health and growth cycle of the livestock. While from time to time the area bedding is replaced and/or the animal rearing floor area is flushed, in the interim, the atmosphere created by animal manure deposits presents an unhealthy period. The invention by periodically applying liquid ferric compound treatment directly on the non-diluted livestock deposits, to alleviate the interim contamination, forestalls the creation of an adverse environment. The invention contemplates the installation of a liquid dispersing system that periodically applies and thereby suppressed the generation of ammonia and other adverse impacts such as soluble phosphorus formation, by applying the liquid ferric dispersion in cycles of every 8 to 12 hours, for example.


Usually these facilities are roofed and confine and may use no absorbent bedding material. The floors are to be cleaned at intervals when no further accumulation is appropriate, such as by flushing with water. The invention deals with the improvement of the environmental health conditions under which the livestock is being reared during the intervals between cleanings and permits the duration of such intervals to be extended without harmful consequence to the livestock health.


In facilities of this kind, the accumulation of manure results in the production of ammonia, which accumulates and saturates the contiguous atmosphere. This ammonia is generated in relatively high quantities, and at more severe levels, is toxic to the animals as well as to humans present in substantially enclosed animal rearing spaces. Further, this ammonia reacts in the atmosphere to form particulate material (PM) of a size that is injurious to human health, PM25 and PM10. The subscripts denote particle size in micrometers.


A severe related problem arising from effluent produced from the animal rearing facilities of this kind is the generation of soluble phosphorous and hydrogen sulfide, which are generated by-products that are also of substantial environmental concern.


While the prior art, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,622,697 discloses the use of iron compounds including ferric and ferrous sulfates and chloride, these compounds have heretofore been suggested as being of possible utility as solids. However, the use of such iron compounds as granular solids in the animal rearing facilities suffer from severe drawbacks in that the animals are likely to ingest solids and results in illness and is often fatal. Additionally, the use of the iron compound in solid form to be distributed in practical quantities is by its nature relatively only marginally effective.


The invention is also distinguishable from an organic waste treatment system in which ferric sulfate or ferric chloride is utilized as a precept and following the treatment of the waste with an oxidizing agent such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,108,771. Such oxidizing agent precursors are regarded as hostile to the livestock.


The invention deals essentially with: 1) Control of ammonia (NH3) and the odors from ammonia, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), volatile fatty acids (VFA) and the like resulting from the decomposition of livestock manure deposits within the growing facility and during the livestock growth cycle; 2) Reduction of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concurrent with the odorous substance reduction. SRP is a pollutant in surface water; 3) Reductions in particulate matter emissions (PM25 and PM10) concurrent with and generated by odorous substances most notably ammonia; 4) Reduction of the pH of the litter, bedding or manure to effect odor control; and 5) A mechanism to produce a sufficiently low pH and free water to inhibit proliferation of microbes and insects especially those regarded as pathogens.


To realize these objects the application during the livestock rearing cycle of a treatment that comprises essentially liquid ferric sulfate and/or ferric chloride to the non-diluted livestock manure deposits, to the bedding containing manure deposits or to the flooring on which the livestock leave manure deposits, is employed. Amounts of ferric sulfate vary with type of animal waste and its physical and chemical characteristics but typical applications comprise the use of about ten (10) to about thirty (30) gallons per thousand square feet of floor area surface on which the bedding or litter treatment is present or on which the livestock dwells. The treatment comprises a liquid containing from about 5% to about 15%, preferably about 8% -13% and most preferable 10% -12% ferric sulfate, as iron, in the liquid applied to the litter as flooring.


The advantage of the system of the invention over the various alternatives such as use of aluminum salts such as aluminum sulfate, aluminum chloride or aluminum nitrate, sodium bisulfate1, clay mixed with acid (normally sulfuric), phosphoric acid, microbial preparations and enzymes, either in liquid or solid form, include the following;


1. Enzymes and microbial preparations function on the theory that the metabolic pathways of said waste decomposition can be changed to produce metabolites that are not odorous or toxic. Being biologicals they require specific growth environments and rarely demonstrate lasting effects without constant and costly reapplication. Further they do not reduce phosphorous and in fact may increase the soluble fraction through their own digestive processes thereby increasing the potentially detrimental environmental effects. Biologicals do not depress pH to control pathogens and insects rather they exhibit pH sensitivity and can die off if pH stressed. Liquid iron products are also more widely available at “commodity” pricing.


2. Phosphoric acid has been widely used in the poultry industry for acidification of the litter, floor, and bedding. Although phosphoric acid is effective, stringent phosphorous discharge and land application limits essentially prohibit this practice. Furthermore, phosphoric acid is far more costly and is a more hazardous acid than a liquid ferric sulfate product. It is also noteworthy that liquid ferric sulfate and ferric chloride products are certified for use in drinking water assuring purity that commercial acids may not provide.


3. Acid clay mixtures are more corrosive and hazardous than liquid ferric sulfate (LFS) and some like products. Being dry products, the corrosive dusts present worker exporsure issues and equipment and facility corrosion issues absent in LFS and others. Acid clay mixtures do not reduce SRP and may actually increase SRP by dissolving particulate phosphorous in manure through low pH. Acid clay mixtures do not reduce litter or bedding moisture as LFS does.


4. Sodium bisulfate (SBS) is a deliquescent salt that absorbs moisture from the air. In this manner it adds moisture to the litter—a negative aspect since reduction of free water is an essential aspect of controlling pathogens in litter. Sodium bisulfate is a dry dusty material that, like acid clay mixtures corrodes buildings and equipment and exposes workers to corrosive aerosols. SBS does not reduce SRP as LFS does. SBS contains approximately 20% (19-23% ) sodium. Sodium will stay in the bedding or manure and when used as fertilizer will increase the salinity of the soil and ground water—both areas of environmental and agricultural concern. LFS contains parts per million sodium and has negligible effect on salinity. Iron is a plant nutrient and LFS treated wastes will have this nutrient as an artifact. SBS has limited utility in other applications and is produced domestically by only one producer; thus availability and pricing can be a concern.


5. Dry aluminum salts have a tendency to be dusty. While not nearly as corrosive as SBS or acid clay dusts, they can be problematic. LFS et al is applied as a liquid by custom applicators and has no dust issues. LFD is more concentrated in terms of net acidity and metal content thus fewer gallons are needed reducing potential application time. The higher iron (vs. aluminum) content results in SRP reduction at lower applied product volumes. Aluminum makes a less soluble phosphate than iron—in many cases this is desired. Some farmers prefer the slightly more soluble iron phosphate end product so they can better use the manure for its nutrient value to crop plants. There is an apparent problem with build up of aluminum in soils that is perceived to precursor aluminum toxicity. USDA studies document the fallacy of t he perception—but it stills persists. Iron on the other hand is not burdened with such perceptions.


6. None of the above technologies are regarded as effective to chemically precepitate H2S. Iron compounds on the other hand have been used for decades for precipitation of sulfides from municipal sewage. sludge and industrial wastes.


Accordingly, the need is apparent for means to alleviate the relatively toxic atmospheric to livestock in enclosed facilities where livestock is being reared on floor areas littered with animal manure deposits particularly during the extended intervals of times between floor cleanings.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the invention, a novel system for improving the health atmosphere under which livestock is reared is provided which employs a liquid aqueous ferric sulfate or ferric chloride or mixtures thereof, that is innocuous to the health of the livestock in concentrations at from about 5% to about 15% by weight., as iron. The invention deals with the alleviation of environmentally undesirable conditions and effluent resulting from domestic animal manure deposits in enclosed rearing facilities that develop from the manure deposits during the livestock growing cycle. The system of the invention involves the periodic application during the livestock growing cycle of a suitable amount of liquid ferric sulfate and/or ferric chloride directly on the non-diluted manure deposits on bedding material or to the livestock non-diluted manure deposits on the floor area. The liquid iron containing compounds may be applied to the manure soiled bedding or to the fresh bedding or to the manure or on a floor are where the livestock is housed. The concentration of the liquid iron compound contained in the liquid dispersant is controlled to maintain a pH environment at or below a pH of about 7.5, and most preferably between 4.0 and 7.0. Although where the liquid iron additive is applied to bedding, particularly already soiled bedding, a manure slurry, an amount is added depending on the accumulated and maturity of the deposit containing bedding to preferably maintain the bedding at a concentration such that the iron content applied inhibits ammonia volatilization and stabilizes, i.e. insolubilizes, the resulting soluble phosphorous.


The invention among the various advantages comprising the use of liquid ferric sulfate, or ferric chloride includes use of a readily available form of iron that is relatively safe i.e., is not harmful to the health of the livestock being reared; its activating effect is more rapid; it acts to promptly initiate the desired hydrolysis; and, in the case of bedding the litter application, acidulates the litter more quickly. Liquid ferric sulfate is commonly a product produced by the digestion of an iron source (hematite, magnetite, scrap iron) with sulfuric acid. LFS can also be processed waste from steel pickling or other ferrous material manufacturing and processing. Typically the liquid ferric sulfate will have 10%-12% by weight iron and from about 0.1% to about 5.0% free acidity. It will have specific gravity of less than about 1.3% to about 1.6% gm/cc. LFS can also be produced by dissolving various dry or solid ferric sulfate or ferrous sulfate products in water and processing to the desired final product strength and characteristics. It can also be a by-product of pigment (TiO2) manufacturing. Liquid ferric chloride can also be utilized alone, or in combination with ferric sulfate; ferric sulfate being the preferred treatment mechanism. Ferric chloride can be produce by digestion of an iron source in hydrochloric acid or wet chlorine streams. The larger volumes are by-products from TiO2 manufacturing or steel/iron manufacturing and processing. It will typically contain 10-12% iron and <1->3% free acid. Waste Pickle Liquor (WPL) is a ferric/ferrous chloride/sulfite by product of iron and steel manufacturing and processing. It is variable in chemical assay and strength tending to low (<5%) iron content and high (>5%) acidity. It is often used as a starting material for other products herein such as ferrous chloride or ferrous sulfate.


Liquid ferric sulfate normally may be processed from a ferric sulfate manufacturing plant, or from industrial waste acid streams or through dissolving scrap iron in the sulfuric acid by diluting or concentrating the desired strength. Substituting hydrochloric acid for the sulfuric acid in the previous manner produces ferric chloride and ferrous chloride materials also suitable. Ferric sulfate is also available as dry materials from iron and pigment manufactures and when utilized can be solubilized in water to the appropriate concentration for use.


In essence the invention provides an environment enhancing system comprising applying a compound selected from liquid ferric sulfate, liquid ferric chloride and mixtures thereof to non-diluted livestock manure deposits in amounts effective to suitably treat the adverse environmental impact on livestock from the manure littered deposits, during the livestock growing cycle. A suitable liquid iron dispersant concentration and application comprises of from about ten (10) to thirty (30) gallons containing about 55 to about 15% by weight of iron per thousand square feet of floor area of bedding or litter surface in which the livestock such as, poultry, swine or cattle are housed.


The invention will be further described by reference to the following examples. However, the invention is not meant to be limited to the details described therein. In the examples, parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise noted.







EXAMPLE 1
Use of Liquid Ferric Sulfate as a Litter Amendment for Broiler Chicken Manure

One hundred grams of one-year old used broiler litter was added to 900 ml deionized water and mixed 30 minutes using a six place Phipps and Bird model 7790-400 jar stirrer. The litter sample was obtained Mar. 08, 2004 from a commercial operation in Springdale, Ariz. growing Cobb-Vantress birds six weeks. Five flocks of 20,000-30,000 birds were raised on this rice hull litter which was decaked (manure mats removed partially) and top-dressed (replenished) with fresh rice hulls after every flock. No litter amendments were used.


To each of six samples aluminum sulfate was added as a known effect at doses per liter of litter and water of 0 (control) 1 g, 2.5 g, 5 g, 10 g, and 20 g. The test data with LFS at 12.2% Fe were based on 0.5 g/1.0 g, 2.5 g 5 g, 10 g and 20 g. The pH was determined on samples settled for one hour using an Orion Ionanalyzer Model EA920. Target pH is <6 for ammonia control. SRP was determined on a Hach Model 780 Spectrophotometer using the Phosver®3 method. SRP was determined on diluted samples of litter. Deionized and distilled reagent blanks were also run.

DoseAlum12% LFSg/lpHSRPPHSRP08.061108.061100.57.93601.07.70767.70462.57.41356.81455.06.88165.813410.05.72164.151020.04.55163.2227


At equivalent dosages in grams of product per liter of sample LFS produced a low pH. Alum still produced generally lower SRP values—but LFS produced the lowest SRP. LFS produced the desired results.


EXAMPLE 2

Based on experimental data a commercial broiler house(s) will be treated with LFS at 0, 7.5 gallons/100 square feet and 15 gallons/1000 square feet. This is equivalent to 100# dry alum/1000 square feet and 200# dry alum/1000 square feet or 25 and 50 gallons of 7% liquid acid alum respectively. Analytical data include ammonia, pH of litter, SRP of litter, bird growth statistics including feed conversion, mortality and condemnation rate, insect infestation and litter microbiology.


Although the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments, blends of one or more of the various additives described herein can be used, and substitutes therefore, as will be known to those skilled in the art. Thus the invention is not meant to be limited to the details described herein, but only by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for treating a domestic livestock rearing environment contaminated with odors from (NH3) ammonia, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), volatile fatty acids (VFA) resulting from the decomposition of animal manures during the livestock rearing cycle within a substantially confined growing facility to reduce ammonia levels and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concurrent with the odorous substance reduction and to reduce the pH of the litter, bedding or manure to effect the odor and produce a sufficiently low pH and free water to inhibit proliferation of microbes and insects, comprising applying to non-diluted animal litter deposits in the presence of and during the livestock rearing cycle, a compound selected from the group consisting essentially of liquid ferric sulfate, liquid ferric chloride and mixtures thereof, periodically during the livestock growing cycle and in amounts effective to suitably treat the type of animal waste and its physical and chemical characteristics and within limits of from about ten (10) to thirty (30) gallons containing about 5% to about 15% by weight of iron per thousand square feet of floor area of bedding or litter surface.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the concentration of the ferric sulfate, ferric chloride or mixtures is from about 10% to about 12% as iron and <1% to 20% by weight in liquid to solid manures.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 as applied to poultry litter.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 as applied to the litter for poultry selected from chickens, turkeys and ducks.
  • 5. The method of claim 2 as applied to dairy cows.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the compound is ferric sulfate and is applied in concentrations sufficient to maintain the pH between about 4.0 and 7.0.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the compound selected is ferric sulfate that comprises about 10% about 12% by weight iron and a specific gravity less than about 1.3 to about 1.5.
  • 8. The method of claim 8 wherein the applied liquid sulfate has a pH of between about 4.0 and 7.0.
  • 9. The method of claim 2 wherein the compound is ferric sulfate.
  • 10. The method of claim 2 wherein the compound is ferric chloride.
  • 11. The method of claim 2 wherein the compound is a mixture of ferric sulfate and ferric chloride.
  • 12. The method of claim 3 wherein the compound is ferric sulfate.
  • 13. The method of claim 3 wherein the compound is ferric chloride.
  • 14. The method of claim 3 wherein the compound is a mixture of ferric sulfate and ferric chloride.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of Application Ser. No. 11/495,208 which is a continuation-in-part of Application Ser. No. 10/887,281 filed on Jul. 8, 2004.

Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11495208 Jul 2006 US
Child 11923990 Oct 2007 US
Parent 10887281 Jul 2004 US
Child 11495208 Jul 2006 US