The present disclosure is related to U.S. patent application titled “Variable Data Lithographic System”, Ser. No. 13/095,714, filed on Apr. 27, 2011, and assigned to the same assignee as the present application, and further which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure is related to marking and printing methods and systems, and more specifically to methods and systems providing control of conditions local to the point of writing data to a reimageable surface in variable data lithographic system.
Offset lithography is a common method of printing today. (For the purposes hereof, the terms “printing” and “marking” are interchangeable.) In a typical lithographic process a printing plate, which may be a flat plate, the surface of a cylinder, or belt, etc., is formed to have “image regions” formed of hydrophobic and oleophilic material, and “non-image regions” formed of a hydrophilic material. The image regions are regions corresponding to the areas on the final print (i.e., the target substrate) that are occupied by a printing or marking material such as ink, whereas the non-image regions are the regions corresponding to the areas on the final print that are not occupied by said marking material. The hydrophilic regions accept and are readily wetted by a water-based fluid, commonly referred to as a dampening fluid or fountain fluid (typically consisting of water and a small amount of alcohol as well as other additives and/or surfactants to reduce surface tension). The hydrophobic regions repel dampening fluid and accept ink, whereas the dampening fluid formed over the hydrophilic regions forms a fluid “release layer” for rejecting ink. Therefore the hydrophilic regions of the printing plate correspond to unprinted areas, or “non-image areas”, of the final print.
The ink may be transferred directly to a substrate, such as paper, or may be applied to an intermediate surface, such as an offset (or blanket) cylinder in an offset printing system. The offset cylinder is covered with a conformable coating or sleeve with a surface that can conform to the texture of the substrate, which may have surface peak-to-valley depth somewhat greater than the surface peak-to-valley depth of the imaging plate. Also, the surface roughness of the offset blanket cylinder helps to deliver a more uniform layer of printing material to the substrate free of defects such as mottle. Sufficient pressure is used to transfer the image from the offset cylinder to the substrate. Pinching the substrate between the offset cylinder and an impression cylinder provides this pressure.
Typical lithographic and offset printing techniques utilize plates which are permanently patterned, and are therefore useful only when printing a large number of copies of the same image (long print runs), such as magazines, newspapers, and the like. However, they do not permit creating and printing a new pattern from one page to the next without removing and replacing the print cylinder and/or the imaging plate (i.e., the technique cannot accommodate true high speed variable data printing wherein the image changes from impression to impression, for example, as in the case of digital printing systems). Furthermore, the cost of the permanently patterned imaging plates or cylinders is amortized over the number of copies. The cost per printed copy is therefore higher for shorter print runs of the same image than for longer print runs of the same image, as opposed to prints from digital printing systems, where the per-page cost is typically independent of the number of copies that are printed.
Accordingly, a lithographic technique, referred to as variable data lithography, has been developed which uses a non-patterned reimageable surface coated with dampening fluid. Regions of the dampening fluid are removed by exposure to a focused heat source (e.g., using radiation such as a laser light source). A temporary pattern in the dampening fluid is thereby formed over the non-patterned reimageable surface. Ink applied thereover is retained in regions corresponding to the removal of the dampening fluid. The inked surface is then brought into contact with a substrate (such as paper), and the ink pattern transfers to the substrate. The dampening fluid may then be removed, a new, uniform layer of dampening fluid applied to the reimageable surface, and the process repeated.
The patterning of dampening fluid on the reimageable surface in variable data lithography essentially involves using a heat source such as a laser to selectively boil off or ablate the dampening fluid in selected locations. This process can be energy intensive due to the large latent heat of vaporization of water. At the same time, high-speed printing necessitates the use of high-speed modulation of the heat source, which can be prohibitively expensive for high power lasers. Therefore, from both an energy and cost perspective, it is beneficial to reduce the total amount of laser energy that is needed to achieve pattern-wise vaporization of the dampening fluid.
However, one byproduct of the pattern-wise evaporation of dampening fluid is generation of a vapor cloud. This cloud can partially absorb energy from the laser being used to write onto the dampening fluid layer, thus reducing the laser power available for patterning the dampening fluid layer.
With reference to
Typically, the thickness of the dampening fluid layer cannot be lower than about 200 nm (e.g., for an aqueous dampening fluid) to ensure reliable ink selectivity between hyodrophilic and hydrophobic regions over the reimageable surface, and the consequent contrast between the image and non-image zones. This is mainly because the selectivity for ink transfer is a result of the splitting of the sacrificial dampening fluid layer from the dampened regions of the reimageable surface, and a thinner dampening fluid layer may not split reliably.
This minimum required dampening fluid layer thickness of approximately 200 nm results in a minimum per-pixel energy requirement based on the heating requirements for boiling-off the dampening fluid (e.g., water), equal to the sensible heating (i.e., heat needed to raise the temperature of the water to its boiling point, typically from a room temperature of about 20° C. to approximately 100° C., which equals the specific heat capacity times the temperature rise of approximately 80° C.) and latent heating (i.e., heat or enthalpy of vaporization of water which is about 540 calories per gram at atmospheric conditions). Based on the above information, we can calculate the power requirements for laser based vaporization of a 200 nm thick layer of water for a print speed of 100 pages per minute and a resolution of 600 dpi (42 micron pixel size and pitch), as shown in Table 1, below.
The above are the theoretical minimum energy and power requirements for vaporization of the dampening fluid assuming that it is comprised only of water, and without accounting for heat loss into the reimageable surface or other regions of the system. It will be appreciated that a relatively high power laser source is required under ideal conditions. However, the cloud of dampening vapor resulting from prior boiling off of regions of the dampening fluid layer can absorb a significant amount of the laser source energy. Considering the presence of this cloud, higher laser power levels are needed to enable boiling-off of the regions of dampening fluid. Providing such a high power laser source may be prohibitive from a number of perspectives such as cost, energy consumption, and so on.
Furthermore, the cloud of vaporized dampening fluid can re-condense onto the fluid layer, partially filling and altering the wall profiles of the pockets created by laser writing process. This is especially true for dampening fluids containing large solids, where preferential edge development can be seen due to vapor cloud diffusion.
Still further, variations in surrounding air humidity can negatively impact the removal rate of dampening fluid from the dampening fluid layer. For example, if a water based dampening solution is used, a higher concentration of water molecules in the surrounding air results in a higher likelihood of re-condensation on areas that are intended to be free of dampening fluid, and an increase in evaporation resulting in more absorptive material interposed between the laser source and the dampening fluid layer as well as variation in layer thickness.
Accordingly, the present disclosure is directed to systems and methods providing a reduction in the power required for, and an increase in the reproducibility of, patterning of a dampening fluid layer over a reimageable surface in a variable data lithography system. More specifically, mechanisms are provided, and steps are taken to minimize the presence of vapor clouding in the path between the radiation (e.g., laser) source and the dampening fluid layer. Conditions may also be controlled such that optimal conditions exist for vaporization of regions of the dampening fluid layer for a given laser source power. Conditions may further be controlled such that re-condensation of vaporized dampening fluid onto the patterned dampening fluid layer is minimized.
Systems and methods are disclosed herein for controlling the environmental conditions in a region over a surface of a dampening fluid layer proximate a location at which a radiation-based patterning subsystem selectively vaporizes portions of the dampening fluid layer in a variable data lithographic apparatus, comprising: an enclosure disposed over the surface of a dampening fluid layer and proximate the location at which the radiation-based patterning subsystem selectively vaporizes portions of the dampening fluid layer; a gas-flow control subsystem coupled to the enclosure such that a gas-flow may be controllably generated within the enclosure and proximate the location at which a radiation-based patterning subsystem selectively vaporizes portions of the dampening fluid layer; the enclosure configured to permit an output of the radiation-based patterning subsystem to exit there from and thereby be incident on the dampening fluid layer; and, the enclosure further configured to permit the gas-flow to exit the enclosure at a desired location; whereby the gas-flow may evacuate vaporized dampening fluid from a region proximate the location at which the radiation-based patterning subsystem selectively vaporizes portions of the dampening fluid layer.
Various alternate embodiments of such systems are also disclosed. Furthermore, variations and combinations of elements of these embodiments are disclosed.
The above is a summary of a number of the unique aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure. However, this summary is not exhaustive. Thus, these and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent from the following detailed description and the appended drawings, when considered in light of the claims provided herein.
In the drawings appended hereto like reference numerals denote like elements between the various drawings. While illustrative, the drawings are not drawn to scale. In the drawings:
We initially point out that description of well-known starting materials, processing techniques, components, equipment, and other well-known details are merely summarized or are omitted so as not to unnecessarily obscure the details of the present invention. Thus, where details are otherwise well known, we leave it to the application of the present invention to suggest or dictate choices relating to those details.
With reference to
System 10 further comprises an environmental control subsystem, configured and disposed to address a number of conditions that affect required radiation (e.g., laser) power and the “quality” of spots written in the dampening fluid layer. A first set of such conditions relates to environmental parameters proximate the dampening fluid surface that affect the laser power required for writing to the dampening fluid layer. Appropriate manipulation and control of environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, and air flow local to the point where the thermal energy (e.g., laser beam) is incident on the dampening fluid layer may result in reduced required energy and more effective laser writing processes.
Environmental Control
It is well known that the process of boiling a liquid substance can only occur at a temperature where the vapor pressure of the liquid equals the surrounding environmental (atmospheric) pressure. This is in contrast to the process of evaporation, which can occur at other temperatures. A liquid is said to boil when it is under a condition such that bubbles of its vapor phase can spontaneously form within its bulk and be sustained upon further addition of energy. Evaporation occurs when surface molecules in the liquid phase acquire sufficient energy (either from the surrounding medium or other molecules within the liquid itself) to escape into the vapor phase.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure illustrated in
Humidity Control
A drier, less humid environment is desired since such an environment provides fewer airborne water molecules in the path of the laser, provides more effective boiling of the dampening fluid, and reduces the number of water molecules which settle into the just-formed wells 50 from which dampening fluid has been boiled off. Therefore, environmental control subsystem 30 may, in one embodiment, be an enclosure proximate imaging member 12 configured to provide a low humidity environment proximate layer 32. Laser patterning subsystem 16 may be enclosed therein. Environmental control subsystem 30 provides a dry air region 36 at least proximate the point at which a beam from laser patterning subsystem 16 is incident on dampening fluid layer 32. Dry air may be provided to region 36 from a dry air source selected from a number of options. According to one option, the dry air source may comprise an air pump (blower) 38 with a desiccator cartridge 40 attached to the pump exhaust, so that the air being pumped out is dried as the air is being provided (see, e.g., http://www.dry-air-systems.com/jetpak.html). This dry air may then be circulated within environmental control subsystem 30, proximate the surface of dampening fluid layer 32, to enhance the evaporation rate of the dampening fluid and reduce the energy requirements on laser patterning subsystem 16. In the event that a non-aqueous dampening solution is used in place of an aqueous dampening solution, dry air will help control the local partial pressure of other solventbased dampening solutions.
A valve 42 may be disposed between environmental control subsystem 30 and dry air pump 38 to control flow rate through a parallel path 44 that bypasses desiccator cartridge 40. Accordingly, the exact humidity content of the air entering the print system may be precisely controlled and tuned to achieve reliable digital printing using the selective laser removal of the dampening fluid.
According to another embodiment shown in
Returning to
A dampening fluid wiper blade 51 may also be employed in association with environmental control subsystem 30. Wiper blade 51 may be used to govern the thickness of layer 32, as well as limit air entry into region 36 from upstream of the point at which layer 32 is patterned. This assists with preventing dust and other contaminants from entering region 36 and interfering with the patterning of layer 32.
Air Flow Velocity Control
With reference next to
Ambient and/or Surface Temperature Control
With reference next to
Manipulation of the temperature in region 36 may be employed to reduce laser energy required to locally vaporize a region of dampening fluid layer 32. That temperature manipulation may also enhance the dampening fluid evaporation rate. In this latter case, the water molecules that may escape into the surrounding air will be more energetic due to the temperature increase and therefore have a statistically lower chance of re-condensing onto the liquid dampening fluid layer 32. Furthermore, in response to designed temperature differentials within the enclosure of environmental control subsystem 56, such as by use of multiple temperature control sources 58, 58a, etc., airflow control within the enclosure can be tailored to blow the vapor away from the path of the beam from laser patterning subsystem 16.
Precise control of these temperature values may thus be utilized to maintain the dampening fluid layer evaporation rate, and corresponding dampening fluid thickness levels, such that the laser power requirement is minimized while maintaining print ink selectivity and image contrast and resolution.
Vacuum Vapor Cloud Removal
Yet another condition that may be controlled to reduce laser power requirements in a variable data lithographic system is dissipation or re-location of the cloud of vaporized dampening fluid away from the laser path. It is desired that minimal vapor be disposed between the laser source and the dampening fluid layer, and thereby minimize laser power intended for writing to the dampening fluid layer absorbed by the vapor.
With reference to
With reference to
A dampening fluid wiper blade 78 may also be employed in association with environmental control subsystem 70. Wiper blade 78 may be used to govern the thickness of layer 32, as well as limit air entry into region 36 from upstream of the point at which layer 32 is patterned. This promotes the preferential removal of material from downstream of the point at which layer 32 is patterned as well as in the path of beam 76 of laser patterning subsystem 16, as discussed above. Wiper blade 78 also assists with preventing dust and other contaminants from entering region 36 and the path of beam 76, which may improve overall system reliability and robustness.
Further according to the embodiment of environmental control subsystem 70 shown in
The embodiment of environmental control 70, as illustrated, draws ambient air at input 80 into vacuum vapor removal system 72. Alternatively, humidity-controlled air or other gas may be provided at input 80, by a system such as discussed above.
With reference to
While vacuum vapor removal subsystem 92 is located upstream of the point at which a beam 96 from laser patterning subsystem 16 is incident on layer 32 (and thus upstream from the point of generation of the dampening fluid vapor cloud), the direction of airflow from air knife 94 results in downstream vapor being directed towards and into vacuum vapor removal subsystem 92. With appropriate positioning of air knife 94, and selection of air flow rate therefrom, any vapor generated by the boiling off of dampening fluid from layer 32 can be carried away from beam 96 and away from the downstream surface of patterned layer 32.
It will be appreciated that environmental controls, as described above, enable consistency and reproducibility in the print process. The environmental controls may be used not only to minimize the required laser power, but also to ensure that the same power is required for each unit of dampening fluid being vaporized. Furthermore, resettling of dampening fluid is reduced or eliminated, providing more uniform wells resulting from laser vaporization and more complete removal of dampening fluid from those wells for optimal ink retention therein at the inking stage.
The embodiments described above may also form part of an online feedback control mechanism that ensures that the dampening fluid layer thickness immediately prior to the point of laser exposure as well as immediately prior to the point of inking is maintained at a constant, desired level, optimized for quality printing at minimum laser energy usage. With reference again to
No limitation in the description of the present disclosure or its claims can or should be read as absolute. The limitations of the claims are intended to define the boundaries of the present disclosure, up to and including those limitations. To further highlight this, the term “substantially” may occasionally be used herein in association with a claim limitation (although consideration for variations and imperfections is not restricted to only those limitations used with that term). While as difficult to precisely define as the limitations of the present disclosure themselves, we intend that this term be interpreted as “to a large extent”, “as nearly as practicable”, “within technical limitations”, and the like.
Furthermore, while a plurality of preferred exemplary embodiments have been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be understood that a vast number of variations exist, and these preferred exemplary embodiments are merely representative examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the disclosure in any way. Various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternative thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications variations, or improvements therein or thereon may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the claims, below.
Therefore, the foregoing description provides those of ordinary skill in the art with a convenient guide for implementation of the disclosure, and contemplates that various changes in the functions and arrangements of the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure defined by the claims thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3741118 | Carley | Jun 1973 | A |
3800699 | Carley | Apr 1974 | A |
3877372 | Leeds | Apr 1975 | A |
4627349 | Claussen | Dec 1986 | A |
4887528 | Ruge | Dec 1989 | A |
5067404 | Frunder et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5118327 | Nelson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5701815 | Bocko | Dec 1997 | A |
5855173 | Chatterjee et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6125756 | Nussel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146798 | Bringans et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6318264 | D'Heureuse et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6531682 | Guttler | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6561090 | Spooner | May 2003 | B1 |
6725777 | Katano | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6841366 | Bower et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6901853 | Baldy et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7020355 | Lahann et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7061513 | Katano et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7100503 | Wiedemer et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7160362 | Terada et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7191705 | Berg et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7419765 | Teltschik et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7763413 | Ray et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20030091363 | Hoffman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030167950 | Mori | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040011234 | Figov | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050178281 | Berg et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050258136 | Kawanishi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060152566 | Taniuchi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070199457 | Cyman, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199458 | Cyman, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199459 | Cyman, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199460 | Cyman, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199461 | Cyman, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199462 | Cyman, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080011177 | Muraoka | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032072 | Taniuchi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080202368 | Kajitani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223240 | Drury | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100031838 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110052244 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101 60 734 | Jul 2002 | DE |
103 60 108 | Jul 2004 | DE |
10 2006 050744 | Apr 2008 | DE |
10 2008 062741 | Jul 2010 | DE |
1 935 640 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1 938 987 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1 964 678 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2006133024 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2009025821 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Shen et al., “A new understanding on the mechanism of fountain solution in the prevention of ink transfer to the non-image area in conventional offset lithography”, J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., vol. 18, No. 15-16, pp. 1861-1887 (2004). |
Katano et al., “The New Printing System Using the Materials of Reversible Change of Wettability”, International Congress of Imaging Science 2002, Tokyo, pp. 297 et seq. (2002). |
Kjelgaard, M., “Humidification Side by Side”, Engineered Systems Mag., (Troy, MI 2002). |
Turpin, Joanna, “Ultrasonic Humidification is Ultra-Efficient”, Engineered SYstems Mag., (Troy, MI 2003). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,714, filed Apr. 27, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,737, filed Apr. 27, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,745, filed Apr. 27, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,757, filed Apr. 27, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,764, filed Apr. 27, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,773, filed Apr. 27, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,778, filed Apr. 27, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/204,515, filed Aug. 5, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/204,526, filed Aug. 5, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/204,548, filed Aug. 5, 2011, Pattekar et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/204,567, filed Aug. 5, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/204,578, filed Aug. 5, 2011, Stowe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,947, filed Feb. 6, 2012, Biegelsen. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,209, filed Mar. 21, 2012, Liu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,262, filed Mar. 21, 2012, Liu et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130032050 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |