Enzymatic detergent and bleaching composition

The present invention relates to an enzymatic detergent and bleaching composition comprising as essential ingredients a lipolytic enzyme and a bleaching system.
Enzymatic detergent and bleaching compositions are well known in the art. They normally comprise proteolytic and/or amylolytic enzymes and a bleaching system usually consisting of sodium perborate, either as such or in admixture with a low temperature bleach activator, e.g. tetraacetyl ethylene diamine (TAED). Although lipolytic enzymes have been mentioned in the prior art as possible enzymes for inclusion in detergent compositions, there is relatively little prior art specifically concerned with lipases for inclusion in detergent and bleaching compositions.
In a rather recent article in the "Journal of Applied Biochemistry", 2 (1980), pages 218-229, Andree et al. have reported their investigations of lipases as detergent components. They found that pancreatic lipase and Rhizopus lipase were both unstable in detergent solutions which contained a mixture of an anionic and a nonionic synthetic detergent, pentasodium triphosphate and sodium perborate, whereas these lipases were far less unstable in solutions with sodium perborate alone.
In the prior art, as far as we are aware, there is no clear teaching about the compatibility or incompatibility of lipases and bleaching systems, and consequently one cannot predict which lipases would be compatible with which bleaching systems.
In our co-pending patent application No. 8514707, filed in Great Britain on June 11, 1985 we identified a certain class of lipases which are especially suitable for inclusion in detergent compositions. These lipases are significantly less affected by a bleaching system than other lipases. These bleaching systems comprise sodium perborate and TAED.
We have now surprisingly found that a certain class of lipases, which will be defined hereafter, is quite compatible with bleaching systems which are stronger than the sodium perborate/TAED system, such systems being defined in more detail hereafter. Whereas, as stated above, there is no general rule to be found in the prior art concerning which lipases would be compatible with which bleach systems, we have discovered that each member of the class of lipases according to our invention is compatible with bleaching systems which are stronger than the sodium perborate/TAED system. The class of lipases of the present invention consists of fungal lipases producible by Humicola lanuginosa, Thermomyces lanuginosus and bacterial lipases which show a positive immunological cross-reaction with the antibody of the lipase produced by the micro-organism Chromobacter viscosum var. lipolyticum NRRL B-3673. This micro-organism has been described in Dutch patent specification No. 154 269 of Toyo Jozo Kabushiki Kaisha and has been deposited with the Fermentation Research Institute, Agency of Industrial Science and Technology, Ministry of International Trade & Industry, Tokyo, Japan, and added to the permanent culture collection under nr. Ko Hatsu Ken Kin Ki 137 and is available to the public at the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Northern Utilization and Development Division at Peoria, Ill., USA, under the nr. NRRL B-3673. The lipase produced by this micro-organism is commercially available from Toyo Jozo Co, Tagata, Japan, hereafter referred to as "TJ lipase". These bacterial lipases of the present invention should show a positive immunological cross-relation with the TJ lipase antibody, using the standard and well-known immunodiffusion procedure according to Ouchterlony (Acta. Med. Scan. 133, pages 76-79 (1950)).
The preparation of the antiserum is carried out as follows:
Equal volumes of 0.1 mg/ml antigen and of Freund's adjuvant (complete or incomplete) are mixed until an emulsion is obtained. Two female rabbits are injected with 2 ml samples of the emulsion according to the following scheme:
day 0: antigen in complete Freund's adjuvant
day 4: antigen in complete Freund's adjuvant
day 32: antigen in incomplete Freund's adjuvant
day 60: booster of antigen in incomplete Freund's adjuvant
The serum containing the required antibody is prepared by centrifugation of clotted blood, taken on day 67.
The titre of the anti-TJ-lipase antiserum is determined by the inspection of precipitation of serial dilutions of antigen and antiserum according to the Ouchterlony procedure. A 2.sup.5 dilution of antiserum was the dilution that still gave a visible precipitation with an antigen concentration of 0.1 mg/ml.
All lipases showing a positive immunological crossreaction with the TJ-lipase antibody as hereabove described are lipases according to the present invention. Typical examples thereof are the lipase ex Pseudomonas fluorescens IAM 1057 available from Amano Pharmaceutical Co, Nagoya, Japan, under the trade-name Amano-P lipase, the lipase ex Pseudomonas fragi FERM P 1339 (available under the trade-name Amano-B), lipase ex Pseudomonas nitroreducens var. lipolyticum FERM P-1338, the lipase ex Pseudomonas sp. available under the trade-name Amano CES, the lipase ex Pseudomonas cepacia, lipases ex Chromobacter viscosum, e.g. Chromobacter viscosum var. lipolyticum NRRl B-3673, commercially available from Toyo Jozo Co., Tagata, Japan; and further Chromobacter viscosum lipase from US Biochemical Corp., USA and Diosynth Co., The Netherlands, and lipases ex Pseudomonas gladioli.
An example of a fungal lipase as defined above is the lipase ex Humicola lanuginosa, available from Amano under the trade-name Amano-CE.
The lipases of the present invention are included in the detergent and bleaching composition in such an amount that the final composition has a lipolytic enzyme activity of from 100 to 0.005 LU/mg, preferably 25 to 0.05 LU/mg of the composition.
A Lipase Unit (LU) is that amount of lipase which produces 1.mu.mol of titratable fatty acid per minute in a pH stat. under the following conditions: temperature 30.degree. C.; pH=9.0; substrate is an emulsion of 3.3 wt.% of olive oil and 3.3% gum arabic, in the presence of 13 mmol/l Ca.sup.2+ and 20 mmol/l NaCl in 5 mmol/l Tris-buffer.
Naturally, mixtures of the above lipases can be used. The lipases can be used in their non-purified form or in a purified form, e.g. purified with the aid of well-known adsorption methods, such as phenyl sepharose adsorption techniques.
Of the lipases according to the present invention, the bacterial cross-reacting lipases are preferred in view of their better overall performance. The bleaching system used according to the present invention is stronger than the sodium perborate/TAED system. This latter system, through a perhydrolysis reaction, forms a peroxyacid, i.e. peracetic acid, but at a rather low rate. The bleaching systems according to the present invention must be stronger than this sodium perborate/TAED system, by which is to be understood that the system either is based ona peracid (inorganic or organic) which is stronger than the peracetic acid or yields, on perhydrolysis, an organic peracid, including peracetic acid, faster than the sodium perborate/TAED system. The bleaching system may consist of a bleaching agent as such or may consist of a bleaching agent together with a bleach precursor. As bleaching agent as such alkali metal monopersulphates, furthermore organic peracids such as diperoxy dodecanedioic acid, diperoxy tetradecanedioic acid, diperoxyhexadecane dioic acid, mono- and diperazelaic acid, mono- and diperbrassylic acid, monoperoxy phthalic acid, perbenzoic acid, can be used, either as acid or in the form of their salts.
When a system comprising a bleach precursor is used, this system comprises a bleaching agent which reacts with a bleach precursor to form a peracid in solution faster than the sodium perborate/TAED system. By faster is meant that the precursor will have a rateof peroxy acid release of at least 2 (two) times, preferably at least 5 (five) times faster than TAED under the same conditions.
Typical examples of such systems are sodium perborate with sodium nonanoyloxy benzene sulphonate or sodium trimethyl hexanoyloxy benzene sulphonate or sodium acetoxy benzene sulphonate or sodium benzoyloxy benzene sulphonate.
The preferred systems of the present invention are sodium perborate with sodium nonanoyloxy benzene sulphonate, diperoxy dodecane dioic acid or monopersulphate.
In general, the amount of the bleaching system in the composition varies from 1-50%, usually from 5-40% by weight. When a bleach precursor is present, the molar ratio of the bleach precursorto the percompound such as sodium perborate varies from 1:1 to 1:35, preferably from 1:2 to 1:20. Mixtures of various bleaching agents and various bleach precursors in accordance with the invention can also be used.
The compositions of the present invention may furthermore contain one or more detergent active materials, such as soaps, anionic, nonionic, cationic and zwitterionic synthetic detergents or mixtures thereof. Usually the amount of detergent active material present in the composition will range from 1-50%, preferably 2-40% and particularly preferably 5-30% by weight. Suitable examples of detergent active materials can be found in Schwartz, Perry and Berch "Surface Active Agents and Detergents", Vol. I (1949) and Vol. II (1958) and M. Schick "Nonionic Surfactants" Vol. I (1967).
The compositions may furthermore include the usual detergent ingredients in the usual amounts. They may be unbuilt or built, and may be of the zero-P type (i.e. not containing phosphorus-containing builders). Thus, the compositions may contain from 1-60%, preferably from 5-30% by weight of one or more organic and/or inorganic builders. Typical examples of such builders are the alkali metal ortho-, pyro- and tri- polyphosphates, alkali metal carbonates, either alone or in admixture with calcite, alkali metal citrates, alkali metal nitrilotriacetates, carboxymethyloxy succinates, zeolites, polyacetal carboxylates and so on.
The compositions may furthermore comprise lather boosters, foam depressores, anti-corrosion agents, soil-suspending agents, sequestering agents, anti-soil redeposition agents, perfumes, dyes, stabilizing agents for the enzymes and bleaching agents and so on. They may also comprise enzymes other than lipases, such as proteases, amylases, oxidases and celluloses. In this respect it has been found that, whereas proteases are often affected by strong bleaches, in the present invention, when used together with the lipases of the present invention, the overall performance of the enzyme system is often not significantly affected. In general, the compositions may comprise such other enzymes in an amount of 0.01-10% by weight. For proteases, the amount, expressed in proteolytic activity, is usually from 0.1-50 GU/.sub.mg based on the final composition.
A GU is a glycine unit, which is the amount of proteolytic enzyme which under standard incubation conditions produces an amount of terminal NH.sub.2 -groups equivalent to 1 microgramme/ml of glycine.
The compositions of the present invention can be formulated in any desired form, such as powders, bars, pastes, liquids, etc.
The invention will further be illustrated by way of Example.

EXAMPLE 1
The stability of various lipases in the presence of a bleaching system was measured as follows:
To a solution of 4 g/l of a detergent composition* and 0.03 g/l Dequest 2041 in water with a hardness of 30.degree. FH and a temperature of 30.degree. C., an amount of lipase is added to obtain 15-20 lipase units/ml.
The pH is adjusted with NaOH to pH 10.0 at 30.degree. C. At t=0 a bleach system is added:
(a) 292 mg/l TAED (65% pure) and 700 mg/l sodium perborate monohydrate or
(b) 1880 mg/l DPDA (12% pure) or
(c) 822 mg/l SNOBS (80% pure) and 1500 mg/l sodium perborate monohydrate or
(d) 506 mg/l MPS (in the form of the commercial product Caroate.RTM.) or
(e) 475 mg/l P15 (95% pure) and 700 mg/l sodium perborate monohydrate.
This yields 1.5 mmolar peracid in solution for all bleach systems. The lipase stability is measured by determining the residual lipase activity with the pH-stat. method.
Dequest 2041=ethylene diamine tetra(methylene phosphonic acid)
TAED=tetraacetyl ethylene diamine
DPDA=diperoxy dodecanedioic acid
SNOBS=sodium nonaoyloxy benzene sulphonate
MPS=sodium monopersulphate
P15=sodium benzoyloxy benzene sulphonate
______________________________________*The detergent composition had the followingformulation: % by weight______________________________________Sodium dodecyl benzene sulphonate 6.5C.sub.14 -C.sub.15 primary alcohol, condensedwith 11 moles of ethylene oxide 2.0Sodium stearate 1.0Sodium silicate 7.0Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose 0.5Na.sub.2 SO.sub.4 37.0Pentasodium triphosphate 15.0Trisodium orthophoshate 5.0Fluorescer 0.2Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid 0.5Water 6.2Dyes 0.01______________________________________
The following results were obtained: No bleach TAED/perb. SNOBS/perb. DPDA MPS P15 activity.sup.(1) activity.sup.(1) activity.sup.(1) activity. sup.(1) activity.sup.(1) activity.sup.(1) 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 Lipase ex. Trade-name min min (min) min min (min) min min (min) min min (min) min min (min) min min (min) Humicola Amano CE 92 93 * 92 95 * 82 80 * 95 94 * 96 82 * 90 83 * lanuginosa Thermomyces -- 96 99 * 98 98 * 81 79 * 95 90 * 82 78 * 85 80 * lanuginosus Pseudomonas -- 97 97 * 97 92 * 90 80 * 100 99 * 89 80 * 92 77 * gladioli Chromobacter Diosynth 105 99 * 95 93 * 95 80 * 100 103 * 100 96 * 100 90 * viscosum Chromobacter Toyo Jozo 100 95 * 100 86 * 80 58 * 107 98 * 85 62 * 93 63 * viscosum Pseudomonas Amano P 100 98 * 92 100 * 85 80 * 109 100 * 89 85 * 102 83 * fluorescens Pseudomonas ex NOVO 93 90 * 98 94 * 89 81 * 100 98 * 97 96 * 95 84 * cepacia Pseudomonas Amano B 101 122 * 73 66 * 125 125 * 91 95 * 125 125 * 91 88 * fragi Pseudomonas Amano CES 92 89 * 102 93 * 79 67 * 101 96 * 104 95 * 104 97 * fluorescens Aspergillus Amano AP 6 110 90 * 100 64 43 14 <5 2 62 <5 12 78 40 24 30 9 7 niger Mucor Miehei SP 225 67 46 28 95 58 35 81 46 28 86 68 * 13 <5 4 73 44 26 Fusarium SP 285 23 < 5 4 23 <5 3 30 <5 4 24 <5 3 25 <5 5 23 <5 4 oxysporum Mucor Esterase 64 21 15 67 25 16 59 24 12 50 20 10 10 <5 4 60 20 12 miehei MM Alcaligenes Lipase PL 55 29 13 40 23 7 33 10 6 nd. nd. nd. species (batch 1) Candida Lipase MY <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 cyclindracea Candida Lipase MY <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 cyclindracea Rhizopus Saiken A <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 species A 300 Alcaligenes Lipase PL 27 13 4 18 11 4 <5 <5 2 18 15 5 17 13 5 17 7 4 species ex Meito (ATCC 31371) (batch 2) Porcine L-3126 15 <5 1 5 <5 1 <5 <5 1 13 <5 1 <5 <5 1 <5 <5 1 pancreas Sigma Rhizopus 580,000 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 arrhizua Rapidase Mucor M-AP 31 <5 7 21 <5 6 27 <5 7 90 49 30 16 <5 4 36 <5 8 javanicus Amano Candida ENZECO <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 rugosa lipase 30,000 Rhizopus Lipase 2A <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 < 5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 species Nagase Rhozopus Lipase 2B <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 species Nagase Candida OF 360 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 cylindracea Meito Kogyo Candida L-1754 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 cylindracea Sigma Rhizopus F-AP <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 javanicus Amano Rhizopus N <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 niveua Amano *too large to determine from these experiments t1/2 = half life time .sup.(1) residual lipase activity (% of input)
EXAMPLE 2
Various lipases were tested in washing experiments under the following conditions:
______________________________________lipase concentration 15 LU/mldetergent composition as in Example 1dosage 4 g/lbleach systems sodium perborate + SNOBS sodium perborate + TAED DPDA MPS All generating l 5 mmol peracid in solutiontemperature heat-up to 30.degree. C. 40 min in totalwater hardness 39.degree. FHcloth/liquor ratio 1 8number of soil/washcycles 3cloths polyester soiled with mustard or sateh sauce PCBC 1______________________________________
after these soil/wash cycles, the residual percentage of fatty material on the test cloths was determined and the reflectance was m easured in a Reflectometer at 460 mm with a UV filter in the light pathway. The residual fatty material was measured by extracting the dried test cloths with petroleum ether, distilling off the solvent and weighing the resulting fatty matter
The following results were obtained
__________________________________________________________________________Amount of residual fat* after third cycleCloth Sateh sauce MustardLipase TJ AP AP6 MY NO TJ AP AP6 MY NO__________________________________________________________________________SNOBS 3.0 2.9 7.6 6.4 6.7 1.6 1.3 2.4 2.4 2.6TAED 3.2 3.1 7.2 6.7 6.5 1.7 1.4 2.3 2.4 2.5DPDA 2.8 2.8 7.3 6.3 6.4 1.6 1.5 2.3 2.3 2.4MPS 4.2 2.8 7.2 6.7 6.6 1.9 1.4 2.3 2.5 2.4NO 3.4 2.8 7.2 6.7 6.7 1.6 1.4 2.4 2.5 2.4bleach__________________________________________________________________________ *In % by weight of the extracted cloths. TJ = Lipase ex Chromobacter viscosum, made by Toyo Jozo AP = Amano P lipase AP6 = Amano AP6 lipase MY = Meito Sangyo lipase NO = No lipase usedReflectance values of the combined lipase/bleach systems(R460* after third cycle) Lipase Cloth Bleach TJ AP NO__________________________________________________________________________ SNOBS 73.3 73.8 69.2 Sateh TAED 68.5 69.3 65.7 sauce NO bleach 65.7 65.5 61.9 SNOBS 70.8 70.3 67.2 Mustard TAED 64.7 65.3 62.8 NO bleach 61.4 63.2 60.0 SNOBS 36.5 36.2 36.2 PCBCl TAED 34.3 33.7 33.5 NO bleach 27.0 26.8 26.2__________________________________________________________________________
Examples 1 and 2 were repeated, but now in the presence of 20 GU (glycine unit)/ml Savinase .RTM. , a proteolytic enzyme ex NOVO. The following results were obtained: No bleach TAED/perb. SNOBS/perb. DPDA MPS P15 activity.sup.(1) activity.sup.(1) activity.sup.(1) activity.sup.( 1) activity.sup.(1) activity.sup.(1) 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 10 30 t1/2 Lipase min min (min) min min (min) min min (min) min min (min) min min (min) min min (min) Ps. gladioli 81 56 37 76 51 31 76 55 36 90 70 >60 63 47 20 81 42 26 Amano P 51 17 10 56 20 12 40 16 6 60 24 12 43 27 8 55 15 11 Diosynth 77 45 27 83 53 35 81 62 >40 78 62 >40 67 52 32 78 32 19 Amano CE 94 92 * 89 71 * 64 61 * 86 91 * 100 92 * 87 82 * Amano B 82 71 * 63 59 * 95 83 * 100 86 * 97 66 * 93 85 * Amano CES 44 12 8 40 13 8 46 26 9 57 32 14 89 76 * 43 20 8 Th. 89 90 * 88 86 * 93 90 * 95 90 * 91 75 * 87 81 * lanugionosus Ps. cepacia 65 35 18 72 38 19 65 34 19 59 42 18 54 32 12 65 28 17 Toyo Jozo 79 48 30 71 38 18 72 47 28 82 52 33 38 22 8 74 29 17 Amano AP6 96 83 * 82 38 25 <5 <5 3 61 15 12 91 79 * 55 24 11 Esterase MM 64 21 13 38 15 8 43 12 8 68 25 16 10 <5 5 74 25 17 Novo SP285 18 <5 4 16 <5 4 16 <5 4 24 <5 5 16 <5 4 20 <5 4 Novo SP225 106 85 * 94 68 * 94 68 * 97 73 * 30 8 7 88 51 30 PL (batch 2) 28 11 5 20 8 5 11 <5 3 20 <5 5 14 <5 5 23 9 4 L-3126 21 <5 1 6 <5 1 <5 <5 1 13 <5 <1 7 <5 <1 7 <5 <1 S80,000 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 M-AP 24 <5 6 18 <5 6 29 <5 7 87 53 33 14 <5 4 30 <5 8 ENZECO <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 Lipase 2A <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 Lipase 2B <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 OF 360 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 L-1754 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 F-AP <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 MY <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 Candida <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 cyl. N <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 <5 <5 <1 *too large to determine from these experiments .sup.(1) residual lipase activity (% of input) t1/2 = half time life
______________________________________Reflectance values of the combined lipase/protease/bleach systems (R.sub.460 * after third cycle)LipaseCloth Bleach TJ AP NO lipase______________________________________ SNOBS 74.0 75.5 72.3Sateh TAED 71.2 71.9 69.0sauce NO bleach 65.6 66.2 64.8 SNOBS 74.3 73.6 72.5Mustard TAED 70.6 69.8 68.6 NO bleach 66.8 65.6 65.1 SNOBS 36.9 36.9 36.5PCBCl TAED 34.4 34.8 33.9 NO bleach 27.0 26.6 26.8______________________________________Residual fat data (% fat after third cycle)LipaseCloth Bleach TJ AP NO lipase______________________________________ SNOBS 3.9 3.1 7.0Sateh TAED 4.1 3.4 7.0sauce DPDA 3.6 3.0 7.0 MPS 6.0 2.9 7.0 NO bleach 4.0 3.6 7.0 SNOBS 1.8 1.2 2.2. TAED 1.8 1.3 2.2Mustard DPDA 1.6 1.2 2.2 MPS 1.9 1.2 2.2 NO bleach 1.5 1.3 2.2______________________________________
EXAMPLE 4
______________________________________Wash and bleach tests were carried out using thefollowing formulation : % by weight______________________________________Sodium dodecyl benzene sulphonate 8.5C.sub.12 -C.sub.15 primary alcohol, condensedwith 7 moles of ethylene oxide 4.0Sodium-hardened rapeseed oil soap 1.5Sodium triphosphate 33.0Sodium carbonate 5.0Sodium silicate 6.0Sodium sulphate 20.0Water 9.0Fluorescers, soil-suspending agents,dyes, perfumes minor amountAnti-foam granules 1.2Dequest .RTM. 2047 (34% pure) 0.3______________________________________
This composition was used in a concentration of 4.28 g/l. The washing was carried out as follows: Washing for 5 minutes at 30.degree. C., thereafter adding citric acid to a pH of 8.5-9.0 and subsequently washing for 25 minutes at 30.degree. C.
The same washing tests were carried out with the above formulation (4.28 g/l), to which 0.292 g/l TAED (65% pure) and 0.7 g/l sodium perborate monohydrate were added (yielding 1.5 mmol peracid in solution), or to which 1.88 g/l DPDA (12% pure) was added (yielding 1.5 mmol peracid in solution).
______________________________________Test cloths: Single wash monitor: BCl. Multi-wash monitor: cotton test cloth soiled with a mixture of inorganic pigments, groundnut oil and milk powder (test cloth A) or a mixture of inorganic pigments, palm oil and protein (cocktail 2) (test cloth B).Results: Bleach effect .circle.1 (.DELTA.R460*) Bleach BC-1 TAED 6.5 DPDA 8.9 NO -0.7______________________________________ .circle.1 Mean data, no significant differences between runs .+-. lipase.
__________________________________________________________________________Multi washResidual fat* after fourth cycleCloth AS8/ANO/MP AS8/PO/C2Lipase Cepacia CepaciaBleach SP341 Gladioli Esterase MM Saiken A300 SP 341 Gladioli Saiken__________________________________________________________________________ A300TAED 3.5 3.6 3.6 4.8 4.4 10.4 11.1 11.1 17.1 16.4DPDA 3.8 3.8 3.7 4.3 5.1 10.6 9.7 10.1 15.7 17.9NO 3.1 3.3 3.8 4.2 4.3 9.7 10.1 11.1 14.7 16.3Relectance values after fourth cycle:TAED 81.2 81.5 80.4 74.7 75.3 54.0 53.7 53.9 49.7 50.2DPDA 83.4 83.4 83.0 78.9 75.9 53.9 54.1 53.0 50.6 49.2NO 80.8 80.5 78.2 75.9 75.3 45.1 51.3 44.0 42.8 38.3__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 5
The performance of Cepacia lipase and lipase from Mucor miehei (SP225 ex NOVO) in the presence of TAED/perborate and P15/perborate was tested on test cloths in washing machines using the composition of Example 4 (the base powder)+Savinase.RTM..
4.degree. wash result of MCSW.
______________________________________Monitors single wash: ASlO (for protease performance) BCl (for bleach performance) EMPA 114 (for bleach performance) multi wash: Cotton test cloths soiled with a mixture cf inorganic pigments, palm oil and protein (cocktail 2)Conditions 3.5 g/l base powder 30 min. 40.degree. C. 40.degree. FH. protease: 20 GU/ml Savinase lipase: Cepacia lipase or SP225: 3 LU/ml bleach: 428 mg/l P15 (70% pure) + 467 mg/l perborate monohydrate or 195 mg/l TAED (65% pure) + 467 mg/l perborate monohydrate giving 1.0 mmol peracid in solution 3.5 kg soiled load present.______________________________________
______________________________________The results on multi-wash monitor were:Residual fat data Reflectance of test cloth(% F.M.) (.DELTA.R460*)Lipase LipaseBleach Cepacia SP225 NO Bleach Cepacia SP225 NO______________________________________TAED 9.5 11.9 12.4 TAED 71.8 68.8 67.8P15 11.0 13.0 14.4 P15 69.8 67.6 65.0NO -- -- 14.0 NO -- -- 59.1______________________________________Lipase effect on multi-wash monitorFat removal Reflectance benefit(.DELTA.% F.M.) (.DELTA.R460*)Lipase LipaseBleach Cepacia SP225 Bleach Cepacia SP225______________________________________TAED 2.9 0.5 TAED 4.0 1.0P15 3.4 1.4 F15 4.8 2.6______________________________________Bleach effect .circle.1 (.DELTA.R460*) Protease effect .circle.1 (.DELTA.R460*)Bleach BC-1 EMPA 114 Protease AS 10______________________________________TAED 6.6 23.2 Savinase 34.8P15 l2.9 28.3 NO 9.8NO 0.5 l4.4______________________________________ .sup.1 Mean data, no significant difference between runs .+-. lipase.

Number	Name	Date
4011169	Diehl et al.	Mar 1977
4421664	Anderson et al.	Dec 1983
4444674	Gray	Apr 1984
4539130	Thompson et al.	Sep 1985
4578206	Walker	Mar 1986
4707291	Thom et al.	Nov 1987
4769173	Cornelissen et al.	Sep 1988

Number	Date	Country
205208	Dec 1986	EPX
206390	Dec 1986	EPX

Enzymatic detergent and bleaching composition

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Parent Case Info

US Referenced Citations (7)

Foreign Referenced Citations (2)

Continuations (1)