Enzyme stabilisation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5240843
  • Patent Number
    5,240,843
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 27, 1991
    33 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 31, 1993
    31 years ago
Abstract
A method of stabilising enzymes or other proteins against denaturation or drying comprises mixing the protein with a cyclic polyol and a cationic polyelectrolyte.
Description

This invention relates to stabilisation of proteins, particularly but not exclusively of enzymes in the dry state.
Few enzymes are inherently stable in solution. Many have a tendency to become denatured when held in solution. Various workers have attempted to stabilise enzymes either by adding compounds such as sugars or glycerol to solutions of them or by freeze drying. These methods often cause a loss of activity. Alternative methods of stabilisation have involved drying of enzymes with stabilisers in a presence of a solid support such as cellulose fibre or polyacrylamide. U.S. Pat. No. 4,451,569 disclosed stabilisation of glutathione peroxidase by freezing the enzyme with one of a number of sugars including arabinose, glucose, xylitol and sorbitol. Freeze drying is expensive to operate on a large scale and often results in denaturation.
PCT/GB86/00396 discloses stabilisation of proteins by use of the disaccharide trehalose.
According to a first aspect of the present invention a method of protecting proteins against denaturation on drying comprises mixing an aqueous solution of the protein with a soluble cationic polyelectrolyte and a cyclic polyol, and removing water from the solution.
Stabilisation in accordance with this invention enhances the activity of freshly dried enzymes and other proteins. The stability upon storage is also enhanced.
The proteins may include enzymes, antibodies, antigens, serum complement, vaccine components and bioactive peptides.
Drying of proteins and especially enzymes is important for many applications, for example use in diagnostic or analytical aids such as test strips which may be stored for prolonged periods before use. Transportation of enzymes or other proteins in solution is inconvenient and expensive.
Although freeze drying may be employed, The present invention facilitates use of the vacuum drying and air drying without denaturation. Vacuum drying and air drying milder processes and are much cheaper to operate.
The cyclic polyol may incorporate one or more alicyclic rings and may have at least one side chain. Compounds having 5 to 10 hydroxyl groups may be preferred. Non-reducing polyols are preferred. Di and trisaccharides are particularly efficaceous but other cyclic polyols, for example inositol may also be used. The polyol may be chosen to suit both the enzyme or other protein and also the polyelectrolyte in question. Lactitol, lactose, maltose and sucrose are especially preferred in conjunction with DEAE-dextrin, lactitol having been found to be most suitable for many applications. Sorbitol is suitable for use with cholesterol oxidase, cholesterol esterase and other enzymes. Cellobiose may also be used. The amount of polyol may lie in the preferred range of 1 to 20%, more preferably 2 to 10%, most preferably 5 to 10%.
The cationic polyelectrolyte is preferably a polymer with cationic groups distributed along the molecular chain. The cationic groups, which are preferably quaternary ammonium derived functions, may be disposed in side groups pendent from the chain or may be incorporated in it. Natural or artificial polymers may be employed. Natural polymers such as polysaccharides are preferred since many artificial polymers contain residual traces of the inorganic polymerisation catalyst.
Diethylaminoethyl dextran (DEAE-dextran) and chitosan are preferred although polyethyleneimine is also suitable. Polysaccharides with MW 5000 to 500 000, preferably 5000 to 20 000, more preferably 5000 to 10 000 may be employed. An amount of 0.1 to 10% is preferred, especially 0.5 to 2%.
The pH at which enzymes are dried in accordance with this invention may be important to optimise retention of activity both upon drying and after subsequent storage. The optimum pH for a particular enzyme may be determined by simple experimentation.
Alcohol oxidase has been formed to retain activity between pH 7 and 8, preferably at pH 7.8.
Cholesterol oxidase, dependent on the source, dries best at pH 5 or 9.
Uricase may be dried at pH 9.
Cholesterol esterase dependent on source may be dried at pH 7 or 9.
Drying is preferably performed in the presence of a wetting agent. Temperatures between 4.degree. and 50.degree., especially 25.degree. to 35.degree. are preferred.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a dried product containing a protein, cyclic polyol and cationic polyelectrolyte.
The dried product may be a free running powder or may comprise part of a test strip or other analytical or diagnostic apparatus.
The present invention is now described by means of example but not in any limitative sense.
Experimental Procedures
Percentages used in the specification are by weight unless indicated otherwise.
All the stabilisation systems utilise buffers to maintain stable pH conditions e.g.
Buffer solutions containing Na.sub.2 HPO.sub.4 .multidot.2H.sub.2 O (10.855 g) and NaH.sub.2 PO.sub.4 .multidot.2H.sub.2 O (6.084 g) were dissolved in 1.0 liter distilled water to give a solution of pH 7.0 at a concentration of 100 millimoles per liter.
An alternative buffer is MOPS--(4-Morpholine Propane Sulphuric Acid) -52.25 g/2.51 distilled water pH to 7.87 with 4.0M.NaOH.
A wetting agent may be used dependent on whether or not the enzyme system is being stabilised in a polystyrene cuvette. A suitable wetting agent is protein hydrolysate from gelatine termed Byco A. These are made up to 1% w/v in phosphate buffer, 100 mmol. l.sup.-1, pH 7.0 as needed.
Enzyme solutions were made up freshly before use. Stock solutions of enzymes in ammonium sulphate solution were dialysed exhaustively against buffer e.g. 100 mmol. l.sup.-1 phosphate buffer pH 7.0 to remove all salts.
Stock enzyme concentrations may be from 10 to 1000 units of activity per milliliter of solution. In terms of protein concentration this is between 0.5 to 200 mgcm.sup.-3. Typically the final protein concentration was 1.0 mgcm.sup.-3.
Soluble polyelectrolyte, polyols, enzyme, buffer salts and wetting agent (if used) were mixed at constant temperature and dried in a vacuum oven over dessicant e.g. silica gel, 0.1 mm/Hg, 30.degree. C. for 4-10 hr.
The oxidase enzymes studied may be assayed by colorimetric detection of the hydrogen peroxide produced by action of the enzyme. Peroxidase acts on the hydrogen peroxide produced in the presence of aromatic alcohols or amines and the heterocyclic compound 4-aminoantipyrine to give quinoneimine dyes. Other standard assays systems may be employed e.g. u.v. spectrometry.
The following systems were employed:
______________________________________System 1Phenol sulphonic acid 25 mmol.l.sup.-14-aminoantipyrine 0.4 mmol.l.sup.-1Peroxidase 1000 unit/lThe resultant dye was measured at 500 nm.System 23,5-dichloro 2-hydroxybenzene 10 mmol.l.sup.-1sulphonic acid4-aminoantipyrine 0.4 mmol.l.sup.-1Peroxidase 1000 units/lThe resultant dye was measured at 520 nm.______________________________________
Standard temperature e.g. 25.degree. C. and incubation times e.g. 5 minutes were used. Reagent blanks contained all components except substrate. Dry preparations in cuvettes were reconstituted with Systems 1, or 2, directly.
Dry powered preparations were reconstituted with phosphate buffer and suitable aliquots were added to System 1, or 2.
For stability trials the storage temperature was 37.degree. C., with samples being removed periodically to check for residual activity of the enzyme. This procedure was standard for all enzymes tested.
SOLUBLE POLYELECTROLYTE AND SUGAR ALCOHOL OR SACCHARIDE
Soluble Polyelectrolyte
Soluble polyelectrolyte was dissolved in distilled water a concentration up to 20% w/v, usually to 10% w/v. Sugar alcohol or saccharide was dissolved in distilled water up to a concentration of 40% w/v, usually to 20% w/v. These solutions were used within 4 weeks of preparation, being stored in the cold at 4.degree. C.





EXAMPLE 1
______________________________________Solution 1 DEAE-Dextran 10% 100 ul Lactitol 20% 500 ul Byco A 1% 100 ulSolution 2 Alcohol oxidase 7 units 35 ul (1.7 mg protein Phospbate buffer 100 mmol.l.sup.-1 265 ul pH 7.0______________________________________
Solution 1 was stirred continuously whilst slowly adding Solution 2 at 4.degree. C. The mixture was stirred for 5 minutes to ensure complete mixing. 0.1 ml volumes were dried in cuvettes as described, stored at 37.degree. C. and assayed for activity as described
EXAMPLE 2
______________________________________Solution 1 Alcohol oxidase 2 411 units 2.7 cm.sup.3 (= 422 mg protein) in phosphate 300 mmol.l.sup.-1 bufferSolution 2 Lactitol 20% w/v 3.0 cm.sup.3 DEAE-Dextran 10% w/v 0.27 cm.sup.3______________________________________
Solution 2 was added slowly to Solution 1 with stirring. The mixed solutions were pipetted into petri dishes and vacuum dried over silica gel at 30.degree. C. for 8 hours whereupon a thin glassy film of dried enzyme and stabiliser was produced. This was removed and ground to a fine powder using a glass pestle and mortar.
For stability testing 10 mg portions of enzyme powder were weighed into sterile polystyrene tubes and incubated at 37.degree. in a sealed container over silica gel. Samples were removed periodically and reconstituted in distilled water. 60 ul of reconstituted enzyme solution was added to each assay cuvette containing peroxidase and colour reagents as described (Table 2).
EXAMPLE 3
______________________________________Solution 1 DEAE-Dextran 10% w/v 100 ul Lactitol 20% w/v 500 ul Byco A 1% w/v 100 ulSolution 2 Choline oxidase 10 units 300 ul (0.794 mg protein) in phosphate pH 7.0 100 cm.sup.3______________________________________
Solution 2 was added with stirring to Solution 1 and thoroughly mixed at 4.degree. C. 0.1 cm.sup.3 volumes were vaccum dried in cuvettes as described, stored at 37.degree. C. and assayed for activity as described (Table 3).
EXAMPLE 4
Glycerol 3 Phosphate Oxidase
______________________________________Solution 1 DEAE-Dextran 10% w/v 100 ul Lactitol 20% w/v 500 ul Byco A 1% w/v 100 ulSolution 2 Glycerol 3 Phosphate Oxidase 300 ul 10 units (0.526 mg protein) in phosphate buffer pH 7.0 100 mmol.l.sup.-1______________________________________
Solution 2 was added with stirring to Solution 1 at 4.degree. C. and thoroughly mixed. 0.1 cm.sup.3 volume were vacuum dried in cuvettes as described (Table 4).
EXAMPLE 5
______________________________________Solution 1 DEAE-Dextran 10% 100 ul Lactose 20% 500 ul Byco A 1% 100 ulSolution 2 Alcohol oxidase 5 units 300 ul (1.0 mg protein in 100 mmol.l.sup.-1 Phosphate buffer pH 7.0______________________________________
Solution 1 was stirred continuously whilst slowly adding Solution 2 at 4.degree. C. The mixture being stirred for 5 minutes to ensure complete mixing 0.1 cm.sup.3 volumes were dried in cuvettes as described (Table 5).
Soluble Polysaccharides
Soluble polysaccharides were dissolved in distilled water up to a concentration of 30% w/v usually to a concentration of 10% w/v. These solutions were used within 4 weeks of preparation and stored at 4.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 6
______________________________________Solution 1 Dextran (molecular wt. 10 000) 100 ul 10% w/v Byco A 1% w/v 100 ul Distilled water 500 ulSolution 2 Alcohol oxidase 7 units 300 ul (1.32 mg protein) in 100 mmol.l.sup.-1 Phosphate buffer pH 7.0______________________________________
Solution 2 was added to Solution 1 with stirring at 4.degree. C. and stirring was continued for 5 minutes to ensure complete mixing. 0.1 cm.sup.3 volumes were vacuum dried in cuvettes, stored at 37.degree. C. and assayed for activity as described.
When dextrans of differing molecular weights are used variations in stability were noted (Table 6).
EXAMPLE 7
______________________________________Solution 1 Dextran molecular wt. 10 000 500 ul 10% w/v solution Phosphate buffer 10 mmol.l.sup.-1 300 ul pH 7.0Solution 2 Galactose oxidase 0.52 units 200 ul (0.8 mg protein) in 10 mmol.l.sup.-1 phosphate buffer pH 7.0______________________________________
Solution 2 was added to Solution 1 with stirring at 4.degree. C. and stirring was continued for 5 minutes to ensure complete mixing. 0.1 ml aliquots were vacuum dried, stored at 37.degree. C. and assayed for activity as described (Table 7).
Cyclic Polyalcohol
Cyclic polyalcohol was dissolved in distilled water to a concentration of 10% w/v. The solutions were stored at 4.degree. C. and used within 4 weeks of preparation.
EXAMPLE 8
______________________________________Solution 1 Inositol 10% w/v 500 ul Distilled water 200 ulSolution 2 Alcohol oxidase 4.7 units 200 ul 91.15 mg/protein) in Phosphate buffer 100 mmol.l.sup.-1______________________________________
Solution 2 was added to Solution 1 with stirring at 4.degree. C. and stirring was continued for 5 minutes to ensure complete mixing. 0.1 cm.sup.3 aliquots were vacuum dried, stored at 37.degree. C. and assayed for activity as described (Table 8).
EXAMPLE 9
______________________________________Solution 1 Inositol 10% w/v 500 ul Phosphate buffer 100 mmol.l.sup.-1 300 ul pH 7.0Solution 2 Galactose oxidase 0.52 units 200 ul (0.8 mg protein) in 10 mmol.l.sup.-1 phosphate buffer pH 7.0______________________________________
Solution 2 was added to Solution 1 with stirring at 4.degree. C. and stirring was continued for 5 minutes to ensure complete mixing. 0.1 cm.sup.3 aliquots were vacuum dried as described, stored at 37.degree. C. and assayed for activity as described (Table 9).
EXAMPLE 10
The following results show the stabilisation of alcohol oxidase (Hansenula polymorpha).
Unstabilised enzyme retained 26% activity after 7 days incubation at 37.degree. C. Addition of chitosan above gave retention of 48.9% activity after 9 days. The activity in relation to freshly dried enzyme was measured after incubation at 37.degree. C.
______________________________________ Period of incubation/Stabiliser days Activity/%______________________________________lactitol 5% 1 86.9chitosan 0.1% 6 85.7 9 82.1 16 86.1lactitol 5% 1 87.4chitosan 0.01% 6 87.2 9 83.4 16 91.6lactitol 5% 1 79.3polyethyleneimine 0.1% 6 77.5 9 76.1 16 77.5lactitol 5% 1 91.1Polyethyleneimine 0.01% 6 84.4 9 96.1 16 93.1lactitol 5% 1 94.9DEAE-Dextran 0.1% 6 85.1 9 88.7 16 90.6lactitol 5% 1 98.3DEAE-Dextran 0.01% 6 88.8 9 89.4 16 95.9______________________________________
EXAMPLE 11
The following results show stabilisation of alcohol oxidase (Pichia pastoris). Unstabilised enzyme retained 49.8% and 36.1% activities after 2 days and 13 days respectively at 37.degree. C. Enhanced activity (i.e. greater than 1-%) upon drying may be attributable to selective degradation of inhibiting impurities.
______________________________________ Period of incubationStabiliser days Activity/%______________________________________lactitol 5% 1 102.5DEAE-Dextran 1% 4 116.6 8 121.3 15 104.3dextran 5% 1 83.2 4 97.0 8 101.7 15 87.6inositol 5% 1 88.0 4 106.2 8 107.1 15 109.1______________________________________
EXAMPLE 12
The following results illustrate stabilisation of cholesterol oxidase (Nocardia erythropolis). Unstabilised enzyme retained 34.3% activity after 14 days at 37.degree. C.
______________________________________ Period of incubationStabiliser days Activity/%______________________________________lactitol 5% 3 96.2DEAE-dextran 1% 5 105.6 14 115.7inositol 5% 1 92.6 7 84.8 10 91.7______________________________________
EXAMPLE 13
The following results illustrate stabilisation of freeze dried uricase.
______________________________________ Period of incubationStabiliser days Activity/%______________________________________lactitol 5% 1 109.9DEAE-dextran 1% 5 114.3 10 109.9______________________________________
EXAMPLE 14
The following results illustrate stabilisation of various enzymes with lactitol (15%) and DEAE-dextran (1%) during drying in comparison to the activity of undried enzymes.
______________________________________ Activity after drying/%Enzyme Unstabilised Stabilised______________________________________Alcohol oxidase 64.7 78.2(Pichia)Choline oxidase 63.3 97.7Lactate oxidase 77.1 90.0Alcohol oxidase 68.2 119.6(Hensenulapolymorpha)Cholesteroloxidase(vacuum dried) 80.0 92.5 (inositol 5%)(freeze dried) 79.0 91.0 (inositol 5%)______________________________________
TABLE 1______________________________________ % Activity remaining Incubation relative to activityPreparation 37.degree. C. freshly dried enzyme______________________________________Alcohol oxidase + 1 day 108Lactitol 10% 7 days 120DEAE-Dextran 1% 14 days 114 21 days 106 5 months 102______________________________________ Unstabilised Enzyme retained 26% activity after 7 days
TABLE 2______________________________________ Incubation % Activity retained relativeBulk preparation 37.degree. C. to freshly dried enzyme______________________________________DEAE-Dextran 1% 4 days 138Lactitol 10%Alcohol oxidase 12 days 1217.25 units/10 mg solid______________________________________ Unstabilised Enzyme retained 34% activity after 4 days.
TABLE 3______________________________________ Incubation % Activity remaining relativeBulk preparation 37.degree. C. to freshly dried enzyme______________________________________Choline oxidase 1 day 99DEAE-Dextran 1% 5 days 84Lactitol 10% 10 days 81 15 days 83______________________________________ Unstabilised Enzyme retained 24% of activity after 1 day, decreasing to 11% after 5 days.
TABLE 4______________________________________ Incubation % Activity remaining relativePreparation 37.degree. C. to freshly dried enzyme______________________________________Glycerol 3 phosphate 1 days 104oxidase 5 daysDEAE-Dextran 1% 10 days 117Lactitol 10% 15 days 113______________________________________ Unstabilised enzyme retained 94% activity after 1 day but only retained 54% activity after 15 days.
TABLE 5______________________________________ Incubation % Activity remaining relativePreparation 37.degree. C. to freshly dried enzyme______________________________________Alcohol oxidase 1 day 137DEAE-Dextran 1% 6 days 103wt/volLactose 10% wt/vol 10 days 108 15 days 92______________________________________ Unstabilised enzyme retained 23% of activity after 10 days at 37.degree. C.
TABLE 6______________________________________ % Activity remainingPreparation (relative to freshly dried enzyme)Alcohol oxidase + 1 day 6 days 18 days 11 monthsDextran 1% wt/vol 37.degree. C. 37.degree. C. 37.degree. C. 37.degree. C.______________________________________M Wt.T10 10 000 93 87 73 77T40 40 000 82 75 61 64T70 70 000 84 86 65 60T500 500 000 83 86 62 49T2000 2 000 000 45 43 22 14______________________________________ Unstabilised enzyme retained 30% of activity after 6 days.
TABLE 7______________________________________Galactose oxidaseDextran concentrations 5% (M.W 10 000). % Activity remaining relativeIncubation 37.degree. C. to activity of freshly dried enzyme.______________________________________1 day 92% 7 days 87%10 days 82%______________________________________
TABLE 8______________________________________ Incubation % Activity remaining relativePreparation 37.degree. C. to freshly dried enzyme______________________________________Alcohol oxidase + 1 Day 150%5% Inositol 7 days 196% 14 days 166% 23 days 178%______________________________________ Unstabilised enzyme retained 26% activity after 7 days.
TABLE 9______________________________________ Incubation % Activity remaining rela-Preparation 37.degree. C. tive to freshly dried enzyme______________________________________Galactose oxidase + 1 day 85%5% Inositol 4 days 78% 10 days 74%______________________________________
Claims
  • 1. A method for preparing a stabilised dried enzyme comprising the steps of:
  • mixing an aqueous solution of an enzyme with a soluble polymeric cationic polyelectrolyte and a polyol comprising mono-, di-, trisaccharides, or reduced derivative thereof to form a mixture, and
  • removing water from the mixture so as to obtain the stabilised dried enzyme.
  • 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said polyelectrolyte comprises a quaternary ammonium functionalised polysaccharide.
  • 3. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein said polyelectrolyte comprises diethylaminoethyl-dextran or chitosan.
  • 4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polyelectrolyte comprises polyethyleneimine.
  • 5. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polyol is a di or trisaccharide.
  • 6. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the polyol comprises lactitol, lactose, maltose, sucrose or cellobiose.
  • 7. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein water is removed at a temperature ranging between 4.degree. and 50.degree. C.
  • 8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the temperature ranges between 25.degree. and 35.degree. C.
  • 9. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polyol comprises lactitol, sorbitol, inositol, lactose, maltose, sucrose, or cellobiose.
  • 10. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the enzyme is present in the aqueous solution at a concentration ranging from 0.5 to 200 mg/mL.
  • 11. A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the enzyme is present in the aqueous solution at a concentration of 1 mg/mL.
  • 12. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the enzyme is present in the aqueous solution at a concentration ranging from 0.5 to 1000 units/mL.
  • 13. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the amount of the polyol ranges from 1 to 20%.
  • 14. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the amount of the polyol ranges from 2 to 10%.
  • 15. A method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the amount of said polyol ranges from 5 to 10%.
  • 16. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the amount of said polyelectrolyte ranges from 0.1 to 10%.
  • 17. A method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the amount of said polyelectrolyte ranges from 0.5 to 2%.
  • 18. A dried product containing an oxidase, a soluble polymeric cation polyelectrolyte and a polyol comprising mono-, di-, trisaccharides, or reduced derivative thereof.
  • 19. A dried product as claimed in claim 18 wherein said polyelectrolyte is a quaternary ammonium functionalised polymeric polysaccharide.
  • 20. A dried product as claimed in claim 18, wherein said polyelectrolyte is polyethyleneimine.
  • 21. A dried product as claimed in claim 18, wherein said polyol is a di or trisaccharide.
  • 22. A dried products as claimed in claim 18, wherein the amount of said polyol ranges from 1 to 20%.
  • 23. A dried product as claimed in claim 22, wherein the amount of said polyol ranges from 2 to 10%.
  • 24. A dried product as claimed in claim 23, wherein the amount iof said polyol ranges from 5 to 10%.
  • 25. A dried product as claimed in claim 18, wherein the amount of said polyelectrolyte ranges from 0.1 to 10%.
  • 26. A dried product as claimed in claim 25, wherein the amount of said polyelectrolyte ranges from 0.5 to 10%.
  • 27. A dried product as claimed in claim 18, wherein the polyol comprises lactitol, sorbitol, inositol, lactose, maltose, sucrose, or cellobiose.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
8826429 Nov 1988 GBX
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 102e Date 371c Date
PCT/GB89/01346 11/13/1989 6/27/1991 6/27/1991
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO90/05182 5/17/1990
US Referenced Citations (10)
Number Name Date Kind
3133001 Muset May 1964
3413198 Deutsch Nov 1968
3950133 Monte et al. Apr 1976
3950223 Yugari et al. Apr 1976
4011169 Diehl et al. Mar 1977
4465770 Modrovich Aug 1984
4824938 Koyama et al. Apr 1989
4950596 Cheng et al. Aug 1990
4965203 Silbering et al. Oct 1990
5102788 Cole Apr 1992
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
0074237 Mar 1983 EPX
0166427 Jan 1986 EPX
2182997 Dec 1973 FRX
0107178 Jun 1983 JPX
0111686 Jul 1983 JPX
1139384 Jun 1986 JPX
2036189 Feb 1987 JPX
1253137 Nov 1971 GBX
2090599A Jul 1982 GBX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Wang et al. "Technical Report No. 10" Parenteral Formulations of Proteins & Peptide: Stability & Stabilizers vol. 42 Suppl 1988 S4-S26.
Back et al. "Biochem" vol. 18 No. 23 1979 pp. 5191-5197.
Chemical Abstracts, vol. 106, 1987, Abstract No. 115739X.