Equalizing flapper for down hole safety valves

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6644408
  • Patent Number
    6,644,408
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 5, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 11, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
An equalizer valve for a flapper in a subsurface safety valve is described. A tapered plunger is biased by compact spring disposed in the plunger bore. The spring is supported by a C-shaped ring extending into a peripheral groove around the plunger bore.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The field of this invention related to equalizing valves mounted in ninety degree rotatable closure members, known as flappers, and more particularly to biasing systems to keep such equalizing valves in a closed position.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Typically, a well completion includes a sub-surface safety valve. This valve is actuated from the surface using a hydraulic control system with control lines running from the surface to the valve location. These valves feature a closure member which is rotatable through an arc of ninety degrees. The control system pressure is used to move a hollow tube, known as a flow tube, downwardly, usually against a return spring. The downward movement of the flow tube rotates the flapper downwardly and out of the way to allow flow from the producing formation to reach the surface through the flow tube. Removal of pressure from the control system allowed the return spring to bias the flow tube upward, whereupon another spring on the flapper urged it to the closed position, blocking the opening in the flow tube.




With the flapper in the closed position, formation pressure builds up on the closed flapper. In this intended mode of operation, the flapper holds back the flow from the formation in order to allow for safe well operation. The problem that arises occurs when the well needs to be placed in service at a later time. The flapper must then be opened. However, at this time there may be substantial differential pressure acting on substantially the entire cross-sectional area of the flapper. Aggravating this differential pressure problem would be a situation in the well bore above the closed flapper where thousands of feet of the tubing was gas filled or filled with a light density fluid. The presence of gas or light weight fluids above the flapper had, in the past, required that such fluids be replaced with heavier fluid to eliminate or reduce differential pressure across the flapper prior to actuation of the flow tube. The fluid replacement procedure was costly as well as time consuming and better methods were developed to expedite the re-opening of the flapper under conditions of high differential pressure.




The equalizing valve in the flapper design was developed to addressed this issue. This prior art design is illustrated in

FIG. 1. A

flapper


10


is shown in perspective with a vertical segment


12


machined out adjacent an edge


14


. Undercuts


16


and


18


straddle the vertical segment


12


to allow for placement of a leaf spring


20


therein. Leaf spring


20


straddles bore


22


in which is disposed a plunger


24


. Plunger


24


has a taper


26


which is biased against a mating edge or surface in bore


22


. The plunger


24


is situated so that a flow tube(not shown), when urged downwardly by a control system will first contact plunger


24


and move it against the bias of leaf spring


20


. Thus, before the flapper


10


begins to move, the taper


26


has come off of its mating edge or surface in the bore


22


to equalize pressure on the flapper


10


. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the view in

FIG. 1

illustrates the down hole side of the flapper and that the flow tube is positioned on the opposite side of the flapper from which location it can make initial contact with the extending plunger


24


.




There was a weakness in the design described above which, in some cases, resulted in leakage past taper


26


and its mating surface in bore


22


. The reason this happened is directly related to the amount of the flapper


10


that had to be machined away to form the removed vertical segment


12


and its adjacent undercuts


16


and


18


. The removal of so much metal to accommodate the leaf spring


20


weakened the flapper


10


sufficiently to allow distortion of bore


22


with resulting leakage past taper


26


.




Accordingly, the objective of the present invention is to improve the design of the prior art

FIG. 1

so as to eliminate the leakage problem under conditions of high differential pressure across the flapper


10


. This and other advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the preferred embodiment, described below.




Relevant to the present invention are U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,079,947; 5,884,705; 5,503,229; and 5,752,569.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An equalizer valve for a flapper in a subsurface safety valve is described. A tapered plunger is biased by compact spring disposed in the plunger bore. The spring is supported by a retaining ring which may be a C-shaped ring extending into a peripheral groove around the plunger bore.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a prior art equalizer design for a flapper:





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of the equalizer valve of the present invention;





FIG. 3

is an elevational view of the equalizer valve of the present invention;





FIG. 4

is an exploded view of the equalizer valve of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring to

FIG. 3

, the flapper


28


is shown to best illustrate the extension of the plunger


30


so as to position it for selective contact with a downwardly moving flow tube, schematically represented by arrow


32


. Plunger


30


resides in bore


34


, which is preferably narrow. Bore


34


has a mill flat


36


, best seen in FIG.


4


. The plunger


30


has a mating taper


38


which makes sealing contact with mill flat


36


. Other configurations for sealing apart from mill flat


36


and taper


38


can be used without departing from the invention. For example, sealing can be metal to metal at an end of plunger


30


. Alternatively the sealing can involve a resilient seal or seals or could involve metal to metal contact at other locations of plunger


30


.




A bias onplunger


30


is provided by a spring


40


which is retained in bore


34


by a retainer such as c-ring


42


. In the preferred embodiment the spring


42


is a wave spring. This type of spring is preferred because it provides a relatively large closing force when longitudinally compressed a short distance as compared with, for example, a coiled spring. Wave springs are available from Smalley Steel Company of Wheeling, Ill. They feature the ability to fit in small spaces and yet to provide the requisite force. In the case of a flapper


28


there is a limited space available dictated by the thickness near edge


44


where contact with the flow tube (represented by arrow


32


) has to occur.





FIGS. 2 and 4

illustrate how much less metal needs to be removed to accommodate spring


40


than the prior art design depicted in FIG.


1


. Very little material beyond the diameter of taper


38


on plunger


30


needs to be removed. A peripheral groove


46


is machined in bore


34


to accept a retainer, such as, the c-ring


42


, as shown in FIG.


3


. Spring


40


, supported by c-ring


42


puts a closing force on plunger


30


by forcing its taper


38


against mill flat


36


in bore


34


. This closing force is overcome by the flow tube force represented by arrow


32


such that equalizing across flapper


28


occurs before the flapper


28


is actually rotated by the flow tube itself.




Those skilled in the art will notice that the removed segment


48


out of flapper


28


is considerably smaller than the vertical segment


12


and undercuts


16


and


18


shown as removed from flapper


10


. As a result, under extreme differential pressures there is no distortion in bore


34


which could cause leakage between mill flat


36


and taper


38


.




Removed segment


48


may be slightly larger than bore


34


to facilitate the machining of groove


46


and the subsequent insertion of c-ring


42


.




While spring


40


is preferably a wave spring other types of low profile biasing mechanisms are within the scope of the invention. Such alternatives can include coil springs or one or more Belleville washers. Yet other biasing systems that permit a minimization of the size of removed segment


48


are within the scope of the invention.




The above description of the preferred embodiment is illustrative and is not intended to be the full limits of the invention which is depicted in the claims which appear below.



Claims
  • 1. An equalizing system for a flapper in a well valve comprising:a flapper having a bore therethrough; a plunger, having a longitudinal axis and an outer periphery about said axis, and extending through said bore and biased into selective sealing contact therewith, said biasing accomplished by an annularly shaped biasing member disposed in a space defined between said bore and about said periphery of said plunger.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein:said biasing member comprises at least one wave spring.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein:said biasing member comprises at least one Bellville washer.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein:said biasing member comprises at least one coiled spring.
  • 5. An equalizing system for a flapper in a well valve comprising:a flapper having a cylindrical bore therethrough; a cylindrically shaped plunger, having a longitudinal axis and an outer periphery about said axis, and extending through said bore and biased into selective sealing contact therewith, a travel stop for said plunger disposed in an annular space in said bore defined between said outer periphery of said plunger and said bore.
  • 6. The system of claim 5,further comprising:at least one spring in said bore to create said bias.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein:at least one wave spring in said bore to create said bias.
  • 8. The system of claim 6, wherein:at least one Bellville washer in said bore to create said bias.
  • 9. The system of claim 6, wherein:at least one coiled spring in said bore to create said bias.
  • 10. The system of claim 6, wherein:said spring is supported by said travel stop.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein:said travel stop is disposed in a groove circumscribing said bore.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein:said travel stop further comprises a snap ring.
  • 13. An equalizing system for a flapper in a well valve comprising:a flapper having a cylindrical bore therethrough; a plunger, having a longitudinal axis and an outer cylindrical periphery about said axis, and extending through said bore and biased from within said bore into selective sealing contact therewith, said bore conforming to the shape of said periphery.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein:said bias is applied within said bore.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, wherein:said plunger is retained by a retainer mounted in said bore.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, wherein:said bias is applied by at least one spring supported by said retainer.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein:said spring comprises a wave spring.
  • 18. The system of claim 13, wherein:said plunger comprises a projection extending from said periphery for selective sealing in said bore, said projection, when pushed against said bias out of sealing contact, directs flow past said plunger radially, in a direction away from said longitudinal axis, to get around said projection.
  • 19. The system of claim 16, wherein:said retainer comprises a snap ring.
  • 20. The system of claim 16, wherein:said retainer is disposed in a groove surrounding said bore.
Parent Case Info

This application claims benefit of Prov. No. 60/251,224 filed Dec. 5, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (8)
Number Name Date Kind
3078923 Tausch Feb 1963 A
4415036 Carmody et al. Nov 1983 A
4475599 Akkerman Oct 1984 A
4478286 Finberg Oct 1984 A
6079497 Johnston et al. Jun 2000 A
6087036 Rouillard et al. Jul 2000 A
6254532 Paolitto et al. Jul 2001 B1
6296061 Leismer Oct 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2343208 May 2000 GB
2345076 Jun 2000 GB
WO 98557732 Dec 1998 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/251224 Dec 2000 US