Patent Application
20070109333
The invention relates to installations in which operations requiring control of the atmosphere inside a chamber are carried out and relates in particular to the field of operations for crosslinking a coating (for example an ink or varnish coating) by ultraviolet radiation (UV curing) or by an electron beam in the presence of a controlled atmosphere, usually an inert gas mixture, for example based on nitrogen, CO2, argon, etc., or mixtures of such gases.
It should be recalled that the use of conversion products curable (crosslinkable) by UV radiation or an electron beam (EB) such as adhesives, protective varnishes, lacquers, inks and paints, is widely used at the present time in printing and surface varnishing. This is because, compared with conventional products based on organic and aqueous solvents, these products have advantages from the technical standpoint (rapid crosslinking, little material shrinkage, quality of the end-product and easy cleaning of the printing plates) and from the environmental standpoint (100% solids content resins and lower energy consumption).
Since the crosslinking step has to be carried out on an industrial scale continuously, 24 hours a day, the chamber having one or more UV lamps is an open system. Consequently, the crosslinking mechanism that takes place in the zone irradiated by the UV lamp is carried out in the atmospheric air. This step is carried out in industrial plants with run speeds ranging from 10 to a few hundred m/min depending on the application.
Most products that crosslink by UV radiation are radical systems. The formulation contains, in addition to the base chemical constituents, such as a prepolymer, a reactive diluent and additives, a photoinitiator (PI). Under the action of UV, this photoinitiator generates free radicals (step a) that will initiate the radical polymerization reactions according to the various steps described in scheme 1 below. The radicals (R*) react with the reactive functional groups (M) of the prepolymer and of the diluent, and initiate the polymerization reaction (step b). Since the reactive functional groups are both contained in the prepolymer and the diluent, the propagation (step c) of the polymerization reaction develops in three dimensions. In this way, termination (step d) of the polymer chain results in a highly crosslinked polymer network (R(M)n).
At the present time, the industrial ultraviolet equipment operates in open system and these radical photopolymerization reactions take place in the atmospheric air. Now, all the radicals (R*, RM* and R(M)n*) involved in the crosslinking process are highly reactive with respect to oxygen in the air. These radicals react with the oxygen to form peroxides (RO2*) and hydroperoxides (ROOH), thus reducing the effectiveness of the radical photopolymerization reactions (see scheme 2 below). Oxygen interferes at various levels of the chemical mechanism described above, with the effect of reducing the quantity of free radicals (step a), preventing the initiation of the polymerization (step b) and prematurely terminating the formation of polymer chains (step d).
These phenomena occur with oxygen initially present in the formulation and with the atmospheric oxygen that diffuses during UV exposure through the film of the UV resin. Oxygen can thus retard or completely inhibit the radical polymerization reaction. The inhibiting effect of oxygen is all the more pronounced when the thickness of the UV resin layers is small.
The practical consequences of these phenomena are:
The importance of the atmosphere composition inside a chamber for the UV crosslinking of resins, and more particularly the absence of oxygen in the UV zone, is therefore well understood. Consequently, it is essential for certain applications to have equipment capable of considerably reducing the oxygen concentration inside a UV chamber, and more specifically in the zone where the radical photopolymerization reactions take place. This equipment should allow the step of curing the UV resins to be optimized.
A number of existing solutions for remedying the drawbacks associated with the presence of oxygen when crosslinking UV resins may be listed.
A first solution consists in increasing the intensity of the UV lamps so as to increase the production of free radicals (according to reaction (a), scheme 1). These radicals, produced in larger quantity, react with oxygen present in the reaction zone and reduce the oxygen concentration of the chamber and therefore the inhibiting effect of oxygen.
This solution, although easy to implement, results in a higher consumption of electricity and therefore a not insignificant additional energy cost since the power of the lamps used is usually about 20 kW. Moreover, increasing the intensity of the lamps will raise the temperature inside the chamber (reaction zone) and therefore runs the risk of thermally degrading -the coating.
A second solution consists in introducing into the formation large quantities of photoinitiators and molecules (synergists), the role of which is to react, and therefore remove, the oxygen present in the reaction zone. Even though these products are increasingly effective, it is estimated that, in current formations, 80% of the photoinitiators and of the synergists react with oxygen, and therefore destroy it, while the remaining 20% are used to crosslink the UV resins.
However, these chemical substances constitute the most expensive part of the formation and, in addition, they may be harmful and their use may cause yellowing of the crosslinked resin and a very strong odor.
Finally, a third solution consists in removing the residual oxygen present in the reaction zone and in replacing this oxygen with an inert gas, such as nitrogen. This solution means that the chamber—an open system, where the resin crosslinking takes place—has to be modified and equipped with a device for operating in an inert controlled atmosphere. The UV crosslinking of resins in a controlled nitrogen atmosphere has many advantages since the absence of oxygen in the UV zone makes it possible to increase the crosslinking rate, to reduce the light intensity of the UV lamps or the number of UV lamps used, to reduce the quantity of photoinitiators and synergists introduced into the formulation, and to reduce the formation of by-products (such as peroxide and hydroperoxides), while still obtaining an end-product of very high quality.
Moreover, it should be pointed out that such working conditions in an inert atmosphere have the advantage of limiting the formation of ozone in the chamber.
Document WO 00/14468 for example has proposed equipment for operating with about 50 ppm of residual oxygen in the reaction zone, with speeds reaching several hundreds of meters per minute. This equipment is characterized by the presence of two gas injection units placed at the entry and exit of the UV chamber. Each of these units comprises two gas injection systems. The first injection system, placed at the ends of the chamber, has the function of preventing any air from entering the chamber, while the second injection system, placed inside the chamber, has the function of filling the chamber with nitrogen. The first injection system is a slot oriented in such a way that the stream of gas is directed toward the outside of the chamber. The second injection system is a tube possessing pores oriented so that the stream of gas is directed toward the inside of the chamber. The width of the slot and the orientation angles of the two injection systems can be modified and depend on the operating conditions.
However, the gas volumes needed for a low residual oxygen concentration for operation at the speeds used are very high (or even very considerable). As an example, at 200 m/min, the quantity of nitrogen must be 140 Sm3/h for a concentration of less than 50 ppm. In addition, the discharge of a large quantity of nitrogen to the outside of the UV chamber in the working zone requires an effective extraction system in order to avoid any risk of asphyxia by anoxia.
It may also be pointed out that the Applicant has proposed, in document WO 02/40738, equipment for controlling and managing the gases during operations requiring control of the atmosphere inside a chamber. The operations intended by that prior document were especially electrical-discharge surface treatments at atmospheric pressure in the presence of a gas mixture and in a controlled atmosphere, or else operations of the UV curing and EB curing type. According to this prior work, the recommended equipment comprises:
Each of the entry and exit devices typically consist (see
The channel, separated from the gas injection slot by a partition, is open facing the internal space of the entry or exit device in question.
The gas (nitrogen) injected through the slot allows the entrained air boundary layer on the surface of the film to be detached. This is because the labyrinth, by creating an overpressure zone (large pressure drop) in the direction in which the film runs, forces the nitrogen to flow toward the upstream, that is to say into the channel. This phenomenon is favored by a lower pressure drop in the channel. This turbulence in the channel creates a zone of slight underpressure on the surface of the, film, which detaches the air boundary layer located at the surface of the film. The stream of nitrogen in the channel then becomes a laminar flow and forms a piston effect that opposes the stream of air, pushing it back. The combination of these three elements (channel, nitrogen knife, labyrinth) makes it possible, at the inlet, to prevent air from entering the chamber while minimizing the consumption of nitrogen. The same labyrinth seal placed at the outlet makes it possible to prevent the gaseous effluents from leaving the chamber.
This equipment proves to be remarkably effective since it allows a film surface treatment to be carried out in the presence of an oxygen concentration not exceeding 50 ppm with acceptable nitrogen volumes.
The use of this prior equipment for reducing the oxygen concentration during the crosslinking of coatings by UV radiation has of course been envisaged. However, it is clearly apparent that, for at least the following reasons, this equipment is not optimized for meeting this technical objective: firstly, the UV crosslinking method does not include a surface treatment and therefore does not require a nitrogen-based treatment gas to be injected into the chamber. But secondly, the absence of harmful gaseous effluents formed in the UV zone makes it unnecessary to use a central extraction system for removing them, which extraction system is, as a consequence, generally absent from such installations.
It is therefore apparent that substantial modifications of this prior equipment be recommended in order to meet this new technical problem.
As an illustration, a trial was carried out for controlling the atmosphere on an industrial prototype of the type shown in
The operating conditions adopted were therefore the following:
Under such operating conditions, the trials consisted in measuring the oxygen concentration inside the chamber and at about 0.8 mm from the surface of the roll, by injecting about 1.4 Sl/M2 of nitrogen into each entry/exit device, with a 700 mm wide product running at speeds of between 50 and 250 m/min. The results of the measurements showed that the oxygen concentration was between 6000 and 8000 ppm depending on the speed used (these results are shown in
The results clearly show that the use of these prior devices does not achieve a residual oxygen concentration low enough for many envisaged applications. In particular it may be seen that, even by having eliminated the reduced pressure inside the chamber, created by the central extraction, the performance of these systems is insufficient under the operating conditions tested (especially the run speed).
One hypothesis that may be put forward is that this result can be explained by the absence of injection of the treatment gas mixture into the chamber, which helps to achieve a low oxygen concentration, the injection of the treatment mixture having been stopped for these trials (very logically, since the intended application here is a UV crosslinking application).
The object of the invention is therefore to propose novel ultraviolet or electron-beam crosslinking equipment, the design of which allows the oxygen concentration within the chamber to be substantially reduced.
The equipment according to the invention is based on the use of two devices, a chamber entry device and a chamber exit device (see
As an illustration, the following geometric values in particular are considered satisfactory:
The length of the channel preferably satisfies the following rule:
The height of the channel is advantageously between 3 and 5 mm.
In this configuration (arrangement and geometry of the components), the chamber entry device may be considered to have two functions: owing to the pressure drop created by the inlet labyrinth, the injected nitrogen has a tendency to be directed toward the inside of the crosslinking chamber and to very considerably minimize the entry of air into this chamber. The same applies to the chamber exit device, which allows nitrogen to be directed toward the chamber and to limit a discharge of gas to the outside.
In what has just been described above, it should be emphasized that the entry device plays a key role, whereas the exit device, if it were to be shut off or at the very least simplified in its structure for certain less demanding applications (as will be seen below), its presence is strongly recommended so as to work under optimum atmosphere conditions.
The present invention therefore relates to an installation in which an operation of crosslinking a coating, such as an ink or varnish coating, is carried out by ultraviolet radiation or by an electron beam, in the presence of a gas mixture with a controlled residual oxygen content, the installation comprising a chamber having one or more UV lamps or a source of accelerated electrons, necessary for carrying out the crosslinking operation, which is characterized in that it includes an entry device adjacent the chamber and comprising at least the following three components, seen in succession by the running product to be treated: a labyrinth system, means for injecting an inert gas forming a gas knife, and a channel.
Moreover, the installation according to the invention may have one or more of the following features:
The concepts of “labyrinth” and “channel” according to the present invention refer to the “labyrinth” and “channel” concepts already used in the prior document WO 02/40738 discussed above, again in the name of the Applicant.
Therefore, as clearly depicted in the figures below, the “labyrinth” concept relates to a system of open grooves facing the internal space of the entry or exit device in question and forming a labyrinth.
In
The results of the measurements show that the oxygen content varies from about 34 to 380 ppm depending on the speed and nitrogen flow rate conditions employed.
These trials demonstrate that an inert nitrogen atmosphere containing less than 50 ppm residual oxygen was obtained in the chamber of the equipment according to the present invention with a very acceptable gas consumption, since this was between 4.6 and 6.5 standard liters/m2.
This improvement over the abovementioned existing solutions is very significant.
Thus,
In
As has already been mentioned above, these measurement results show that the oxygen concentration is between 6000 and 8000 ppm, depending on the speed used, for an overall volume of 2.8 standard liters/m2. The use of higher nitrogen volumes (3.25 standard liters m2 in each entry/exit device, i.e. an overall volume of 6.5 standard liters/m2) allows this concentration to be reduced to about 3000 ppm.
The oxygen content reduction dO2/O2 expressed as a percent is defined by the following equation:
dO2/O2═(([O2]fig. 4−[O2]fig. 3)/[O2]fig. 4)×100.
It may therefore be seen that the reduction in residual oxygen content in the chamber is at least 94% with the same speed and nitrogen volume parameters. It even reaches 98 to 99% in the case of higher volumes.
In this configuration, the chamber entry device (shown in
As regards the chamber exit device (
The orientation of the nitrogen injection slots to the roll is, in the case of the embodiment shown, about 90° for the first slot of the entry device and 45° in the case of the second slot of the entry device. The width of the slots is about 0.2 mm for the first slot and 0.4 mm for the second slot, respectively. The distance between the entry device and the roll is about 0.8 mm.
The orientation of the nitrogen injection slot of the exit device is about 90° to the roll and its width about 0.3 mm. The distance between the exit device and the support roll is about 0.8 mm.
The configuration illustrated by this embodiment makes the detachment of the air boundary layer located at the surface of the film to be even more effective (compared with the configuration described previously in conjunction with
In fact, the entry device of
To measure the effectiveness of the latter embodiment, experiments on controlling the atmosphere in a chamber equipped with entry/exit devices such as those illustrated in conjunction with
Slots 1 and 2 correspond to those of the entry device, while slot 3 corresponds to that of the exit device.
It should be noted in this table that both the flow rates in Sm3/h (as is conventional) and volume in Sl/m2 of film treated have been indicated so as to be able to continue the comparison with the results presented earlier.
The results show that, thanks to the equipment of
In the foregoing, the invention was most particularly illustrated by examples using nitrogen, butt it should be noted that it would be possible, without at any moment departing from the scope of the present invention, to use other gases or gas mixtures, and especially argon, CO2, helium or mixtures thereof.
It may even be indicated that it is preferable to use CO2 or mixtures containing CO2, since it has been found that when CO2 (as opposed to nitrogen) is used:
Such results are probably due to the density of CO2, which is higher than that of nitrogen.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0450155 | Jan 2004 | FR | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/FR05/50040 | 1/24/2005 | WO | 7/14/2006 |
