Equipment management system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10049365
  • Patent Number
    10,049,365
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 4, 2013
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 14, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A system and method of managing equipment is disclosed. The system incorporates a tagging device to attach identification tags to each piece of equipment. A scanning device is used to read the identification tags and relay this information to an equipment server. An input device is used to input information to the equipment server. The equipment server runs the equipment management program. The system flags a potential asset assigned to an asset creating individual. Equipment is designated an asset after use in an asset creating event.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.


REFERENCE TO A MICROFICHE APPENDIX

Not applicable.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a system for the management of equipment, and particularly to the management of sports equipment. The invention identifies inventory, tracks inventory during the conversion from its status from inventory to valued asset, and provides a provenance for items of sports memorabilia.


Tracing its origins to the trading cards children would collect and trade of their favorite professional athletes, the sports memorabilia market is now a huge industry. Sports enthusiasts will pay large sums of money for items associated with their favorite teams and players. A visit to any professional sporting venue reveals stores selling replica jerseys. Labels sewn into the jerseys stating “Official” or “Authentic” are intended to convince the purchaser that the item is identical to the one worn by their favorite player. Even more valuable to a collector is an item actually worn or used in a game. Collectors today will pay much more for a jersey or other piece of equipment used in a game.


As in the antique industry, with sports memorabilia, the history of an item is important when calculating value. For example, a civil war era pistol is a valuable item to a collector. A civil war era pistol owned by U.S. Grant or Robert E. Lee would be worth considerably more. An item separate from such a pistol that establishes a history of ownership is called provenance. In the sports memorabilia industry provenance can enhance the value of an item. For example, if a player sets a record in a game, the jersey he wears while breaking that record will be valuable. After the game, some person must take possession of the jersey and deliver it to a prospective buyer with some assurance that the jersey is the one worn in the game. Because of the potential money at stake, there is incentive for dishonesty.


One of the main concerns for this industry is authenticity. A common method of authentication is to have the athlete sign an item for sale. According to information on the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) website more than fifty percent of autographed memorabilia may be forged. The forged items are often provided with forged certificates of authenticity and photographs of the athlete signing a similar item. Unfortunately, unless the collector receives the item directly from the athlete there is often no way of being sure of authenticity.


A professional sports team is operated as a business. Identifying and exploiting new revenue sources is critical to success. It is also important to minimize expenses.


There is a need for a system which can account for every piece of equipment owned by a team and the use of that equipment. U.S. Pat. No. 6,195,006 (herein incorporated by reference) to Bowers et al. discloses an inventory system using RFID tags. This system can account for every piece of inventory and provide circulation status. U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,351 (herein incorporated by reference) to Yabuki discloses a system for providing information about exhibition objects. These systems could be adapted for use with the equipment used by a sports team but neither of these systems would be able to identify a piece of sports memorabilia and provide a record of its use in a game. There is a need for a system which can identify a piece of equipment used in a game which can subsequently be sold as a piece of sports memorabilia. There is a further need for a system which can provide the provenance of an item of sports memorabilia. The provenance provides a history of the item as well as authentication. This invention fills these needs.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention is a system and method of managing equipment. The invention identifies inventory, tracks inventory outflows and inflows, and manages inventory during the conversion from its status from inventory to valued asset to establish the provenance of the piece of equipment. The system incorporates a tagging device to attach identification tags to each piece of equipment. A reading device such as a scanner, is used to read the identification tags and this information is ultimately relayed to an equipment server. An input device (which could be the reading device) is used to input information to the equipment server. The equipment server runs the equipment management program.


In use, the system first receives equipment into inventory. The equipment is then identified by group and type. Equipment groups are user defined labels (e.g. game jerseys, boxing gloves, shorts). Equipment types have any number of fixed (e.g. catalog item number) and optional properties (e.g. size). The collection of all of the equipment is the inventory.


If not already present, an identification tag is affixed to each piece of equipment. Each identification tag is then scanned. The scanned value is then assigned an equipment group and equipment type. These values are sent to the equipment server and stored in an inventory database. This process is repeated for each piece of equipment.


Next the equipment is issued to an individual. Each piece of equipment is scanned, or identified as it is issued to an individual. Using the input device, the individual's profile is accessed and the piece of equipment is registered to that individual. A time and date stamp is included.


Finally, the equipment is returned. Each piece of equipment is scanned as it is returned. Using the input device, the piece of equipment is indicated as returned and whether the equipment was used in an value-enhancing event.


The equipment management program may indicate whether the piece of equipment has been transformed into a valued asset, or whether the piece of equipment should be returned to inventory to be reassigned later.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate the embodiments of the present invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a diagram of the system architecture;



FIG. 2 is a diagram of the application server;



FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the equipment reception step;



FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the equipment issue step;



FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the equipment return step; and



FIG. 6 is a flowchart of the improved method of equipment management.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The physical components of the system can be seen in FIG. 1. A tagging device 10 is used to attach an identification tag 12 to a piece of equipment. The identification tag 12 can be any portable unique identifier. In the preferred embodiment, identification tag 12 is a barcode. However, it should be understood that any suitable identifier may be used, so long as the piece of equipment is uniquely identified. Thus, the unique identification tag 12 may take the form of a radio frequency (RF) tag, a magnetic strip tag, an electronically operated tag, or a biological tag.


Scanning device 14 is used to read the identification tag 12. The scanning device 14 can be any type of scanning device, but in the preferred embodiment the scanning device 14 is a barcode reader. The invention will also work with a bulk type scanner capable of scanning many pieces of equipment simultaneously.


The scanning device 14 is in communication with a handheld personal computer (PC) 16. The PC 16 is connected to the scanning device 14 by any acceptable means, but in the preferred embodiment a radio frequency switch 18 is used. The scanning device 14 can also be connected by a hard-wired attachment such as a serial cable or USB cable, or by a wireless device such as by infrared communication. The scanning device 14 can also be integrated directly into the PC 16.


In the preferred embodiment, the PC 16 is connected to an application server 20 by a hard-wired (serial or USB cable) attachment through a cradle 22. Any other suitable attachment means can be used including RF and IR connections. The application server 20 interacts with a web browser 24 allowing remote access.


The scanning device 14 and the PC 16 can be operated using any suitable operating system, but in the preferred embodiment MICROSOFT WINDOWS CE is used. The application server and web browser can use any suitable program but in the preferred embodiment MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT AND INTERNET EXPLORER are used, respectively. The equipment management program runs on the application server 20 and can be any inventory management program capable of being customized.


The equipment management program is used to organize and store information. Information is stored in equipment management databases. The information in the databases is used by an application server to generate different reports.


The program stores information in two types of databases. The first database is the equipment database. The second database is the individual database. The equipment database stores information for each piece of equipment. The first component of information is an identification code. This information corresponds to the portable unique identifier located on the piece of equipment. The next component is an asset flag that can be turned on and off. A status component is either activated or deactivated. Equipment group is a user-defined label. For example an equipment group can be designated “Practice Jersey”, “Indoor Shoes”, “Boxing Gloves”, “Helmet”, “Home Game Jersey”, “Soccer Shorts”, “Baseball Bat”, etc. Equipment type consists of any number of fixed and optional properties. Fixed properties can be information such as the catalog number. Optional properties include items such as size or sleeve length. Also included in the equipment database is assignment information.


The individual database has information on each individual in the system. This information includes identification of the individual, asset creation status, equipment preferences, and equipment assignments.


The system is used to manage equipment and identify assets. Referring to FIG. 3, it can be seen how the system is used. To start using the system, every current piece of equipment and every incoming piece of equipment must be examined for a portable unique identifier tag 12. It should be noted that the term “tag” does not require a certain geometrical shape, and specifically, does not require a rectangular shape After affixing a portable unique identifier tag 12 to the equipment where missing, the information on the equipment and unique identifier tag 12 is entered into the system. This is done by reading the portable unique identifier tag 12 with the scanning device 14. The equipment group, equipment type and any optional properties are then associated with the piece of equipment. This is repeated until each piece of all equipment with unique identifier tag 12 is entered into the system's first database.


The next step is to issue the equipment. This process is shown in FIG. 4. After identifying the individual who is receiving equipment, the system calls up that individual's equipment profile. This is a list of all the equipment which needs to be assigned to that individual. An individual can have several equipment profiles depending upon the scheduled activity. For example, the individual can have a practice profile and a game profile. After all of the proper equipment is selected after consulting the individual's profile, the selected equipment is scanned, the equipment status associated with each piece of equipment is changed to assigned, and the equipment is handed over to the individual. Finally, a time and date stamp is associated with the transaction. This updates the equipment profile in the equipment database and updates information on the individual's profile in the individual profile database. In the equipment profile database, the individual's name is associated with each piece of equipment handed out. In the individual profile database, the piece of equipment is associated with an “assigned equipment” list.


The return of equipment is similar to the issue equipment process. This process is shown in FIG. 5. Equipment is returned by the individual, and the identification tags 12 associated with the equipment is scanned. The equipment is physically inspected to determine whether it is broken. If broken, a determination is made to see whether the equipment can be repaired. If repairable, the equipment is inactivated. If not repairable, the equipment is sent to equipment disposal. If the equipment is not broken, the equipment is checked to see if it is an asset. No equipment can become an asset until after an asset-creating event has occurred and has been documented by the system. An asset-creating event can be any event, but in the preferred embodiment, an asset-creating event is a game. If not an asset, the equipment profile database and individual profile database are updated. If it is an asset, a check is made to see if the asset should be retained. If the asset is to be retained the equipment is deactivated and set aside for disposal. If the asset is not to be retained, equipment and individual profiles are updated. The usage of the equipment is then recorded in the system. An example of this would be to indicate the piece of equipment was used in a game.


The equipment program uses a two-step process to designate a piece of equipment an asset. Using the input device the asset flag can be turned on for an equipment group. Indeed, with the desire by collectors and sports fans to possess “authentic” jerseys or equipment, even equipment that is unassigned in inventory can become valuable. All equipment in that group then becomes a potential asset. The next step is to set the asset status in the individual profiles. The default setting in all individual profiles turns the asset flag off when a piece of equipment is assigned to that individual. For a specifically identified individuals, the default setting is reversed and the asset flag stays turned on when the equipment is assigned to that individual. Generally, only the team stars would have this asset setting.


The equipment management program creates a history file for each piece of equipment. The history file includes information relating to the assignment and use of the piece of equipment. Such history information may include, but is not limited to, the name of the individual using the equipment, the dates and times of use, the opposing team or opposing player, various records achieved or broken during the use of the equipment, etc. This information is stored in the equipment application server and can be accessed via the Internet using a web browser. Accordingly, a person selling an asset as an article of sports memorabilia may access the history file and demonstrate authenticity as well as the provenance of the item.


The equipment management program also has an order form generation feature. When a piece of equipment is deactivated and disposed of (i.e. broken or sold as an asset) the program may automatically generate a complete order form, or may electronically place an order for replacement equipment using the equipment profile.


The equipment management program also has a post activity update feature. For example, a future Hall of Fame athlete can create a market demand for game-worn equipment. A report is generated detailing every piece of equipment ever assigned to the individual. The results are then filtered by equipment group. The desired results are then deactivated and designated for disposal.


The equipment management system of the present invention provides accountability for every piece of equipment. It should be noted that the invention is drawn to an improved method of using a known system to manage equipment. The above described system is indicative of the type of system the invention is intended to work with, but should not be construed as the only type of system the method works with. The invention is intended to function with any type of equipment management system. The improvement involves the ability to identify or flag a piece of equipment assigned to an asset-creating individual. In the preferred embodiment, an asset-creating individual for a sports team is identified as any player that can create a market for game-used equipment. In most cases this would be a fan favorite player. It is specifically pointed out that the system may also function with athletes participating in non-team, individual sports, such as boxing, tennis, swimming, track and field, etc. A potential asset is defined as any piece of equipment which becomes valuable when used in an asset creating event. In the preferred embodiment potential assets are items like game jerseys, shoes, helmets, boxing gloves, shorts, baseball bats, baseball gloves, shirts, hats, etc.


The improvement is shown in the flowchart of FIG. 6. The invention identifies items meeting the following three criteria: 1) potential assets, 2) assigned to asset creating individuals, 3) used in an asset-creating event. The preferred embodiment above uses a flag to identify an asset. The flag is turned on for all members of an equipment group. The flag is then turned off if the equipment is assigned to a non asset creating individual, but left on when assigned to an asset creating individual. After an asset-creating event has taken place, the system designates an asset for any flagged piece of equipment. It should be noted that any number of other methods could be used to designate an asset, and the invention is intended to encompass those variants. For example the system could flag all equipment assigned to an asset-creating individual and turn the flag off for any piece of equipment not in a designated equipment group. The invention is intended to cover a method of assigning a flag to a piece of equipment designated a potential asset and assigned to an asset-creating individual.


In view of the foregoing, it will be seen that the several advantages of the invention are achieved and attained. The preferred embodiment and alternatives were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. As various modifications could be made in the constructions and methods herein described and illustrated without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the foregoing description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative rather than limiting. For example, the system and method could be used on the set of a movie or on a political campaign. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method for monitoring items, the method comprising: accessing a list containing a plurality of wireless tag identifiers;sending, for each of the wireless tag identifiers in the list, a query via the antenna to the wireless tag corresponding to the wireless tag identification;verifying that an item corresponding to the wireless tag is present in an area for each of the plurality of wireless tag identifiers when a response is received via the antenna from the wireless tag corresponding to the wireless tag identification;associating each of the items with a a personal identifier associated with an individual and an event;verifying that each of the plurality of individuals are present in the area;determining one or more additional items to be checked out to each of the individuals as a function of the individual;changing a status indicator associated with the items to show that the items have been checked out to the individual; andstoring data identifying the individual and the event the item is used.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein each query is sent via the antenna to the corresponding wireless tag via a wireless link between the antenna and the wireless tag.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving one of the items after it has been checked out to the individual;determining whether the item corresponding to the wireless tag has been checked out to the individual; andchecking the item back in by changing a status of the item.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein in the accessing step, the list is accessed from a memory device and further comprising storing data that identifies an event at which the items have been used.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the list that is accessed from a memory device is a prior list that was generated during a prior monitoring operation prior to a start of a predetermined event, wherein data identifying the predetermined event is stored in the memory device.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the query sent to the wireless tag contains the wireless tag identification that corresponds to the wireless tag.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the list further contains a status indicator corresponding to each of the at least one wireless tag identifier, the status indicator providing an indication of whether the item associated with the wireless tag that corresponds to the wireless tag identification has been used in an event.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising: receiving the items from the individuals after they have been used by the individuals in a single event; andchanging a status indicator associated with the items to show that the items have been checked in from the individuals.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the unique identification code is a value of the wireless tag identification that corresponds to the wireless tag.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: performing a scan operation to determine a presence of a new wireless tag that does not have a corresponding wireless tag identification in the inventory list; andupdating the inventory list to include a new wireless tag determined to be present during the scan operation.
  • 11. A monitoring system for monitoring items, each of which has a corresponding wireless tag with a corresponding wireless tag identifier, comprising: an antenna operable to receive and transmit signals within an area; anda processor configured to: access a list containing a plurality of wireless tag identifiers;send a query via the antenna to the wireless tags corresponding to the wireless tag identifiers;verify that the items corresponding to the wireless tags are present in the area when a response is received via the antenna from the wireless tag corresponding to the wireless tag identification;verify that a plurality of individuals, each associated with one or more item, are present in the area;associate each of the items with a personal identifier associated with one of the individuals and an event; andstoring data identifying the individual and the event the item is used.
  • 12. The monitoring system of claim 11, wherein each query is sent via the antenna to the corresponding wireless tag via a wireless link between the antenna and the wireless tag.
  • 13. The monitoring system of claim 11, wherein each wireless tag is an active RFID tag.
  • 14. The monitoring system of claim 11, further comprising a memory device that is operationally coupled to the processor, wherein in the accessing step the list is accessed from the memory device.
  • 15. The monitoring system of claim 14, wherein the list that is accessed from the memory device is a prior list that was generated during a prior monitoring operation.
  • 16. The monitoring system of claim 11, wherein the query sent to the wireless tag is based on the wireless tag identification that corresponds to the wireless tag.
  • 17. The monitoring system of claim 11, wherein the list further contains a first status indicator and a second status indicator corresponding to each of the at least one wireless tag identification, the first status indicator providing an indication of whether the wireless tag that corresponds to the wireless tag identification is associated with an individual and the second status indicator providing an indication of whether the wireless tag that corresponds to the wireless tag identification has been checked out for use during an event.
  • 18. The monitoring system of claim 11, wherein the query sent to the wireless tag is based on a unique identification code that corresponds to the wireless tag.
  • 19. The monitoring system of claim 18, wherein the unique identification code is a value of the wireless tag identification that corresponds to the wireless tag.
  • 20. The monitoring system of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured to: perform a scan operation to determine a presence of a new wireless tag that does not have a corresponding wireless tag identification in the list; andupdate the list to include a new wireless tag determined to be present during the scan operation and a status indicator that identifies whether a product associated with the new wireless tag has been used in an asset-creating event.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/950,585, filed on Nov. 19, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,370,225, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/086,943, filed on Mar. 22, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,840,453, issued Nov. 23, 2010, entitled “EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM,” which is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 10/038,292, filed Jan. 4, 2002 entitled “EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM,” now abandoned, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,185, issued Jul. 31, 2012, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACKING AUTHENTICATED ITEMS,” and pending U.S. Continuation patent application Ser. No. 13/556,002, filed Jul. 23, 2012, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACKING AUTHENTICATED ITEMS.”

US Referenced Citations (151)
Number Name Date Kind
2292387 Markey et al. Aug 1942 A
4277837 Stuckert Jul 1981 A
4386266 Chesarek May 1983 A
4529870 Chaum Jul 1985 A
4636950 Caswell et al. Jan 1987 A
4686515 Anderson et al. Aug 1987 A
4688026 Scribner et al. Aug 1987 A
4689478 Hale et al. Aug 1987 A
4816824 Katz et al. Mar 1989 A
4857716 Gombrich et al. Aug 1989 A
5050031 Weiley Sep 1991 A
5267315 Narita et al. Nov 1993 A
5267756 Molee et al. Dec 1993 A
5276311 Hennige Jan 1994 A
5288980 Patel et al. Feb 1994 A
5306049 Schireck Apr 1994 A
5319544 Schmerer et al. Jun 1994 A
5361134 Hu et al. Nov 1994 A
5380047 Molee et al. Jan 1995 A
5436970 Ray et al. Jul 1995 A
5521984 Denenberg et al. May 1996 A
5548110 Storch et al. Aug 1996 A
5578808 Taylor Nov 1996 A
5585787 Wallerstein Dec 1996 A
5595356 Kewin Jan 1997 A
5604802 Holloway Feb 1997 A
5635693 Benson et al. Jun 1997 A
5640002 Ruppert et al. Jun 1997 A
5642419 Rosen Jun 1997 A
5673338 Denenberg et al. Sep 1997 A
5689561 Pace Nov 1997 A
5732401 Conway Mar 1998 A
5737886 Kruckemeyer Apr 1998 A
5770843 Rose et al. Jun 1998 A
5774876 Woolley et al. Jun 1998 A
5777884 Belka et al. Jul 1998 A
5794213 Markman Aug 1998 A
5796351 Yabuki Aug 1998 A
5825299 Fuentes et al. Oct 1998 A
5825302 Stafford Oct 1998 A
5870733 Bass et al. Feb 1999 A
5878416 Harris et al. Mar 1999 A
5895073 Moore Apr 1999 A
5930770 Edgar Jul 1999 A
5963133 Monjo Oct 1999 A
5963134 Bowers et al. Oct 1999 A
5963919 Brinkley et al. Oct 1999 A
5971435 DiCesare et al. Oct 1999 A
6002344 Bandy et al. Dec 1999 A
6026378 Onozaki Feb 2000 A
6030001 Kruckemeyer Feb 2000 A
6061656 Pace May 2000 A
6070141 Houvener et al. May 2000 A
6076064 Rose, Jr. Jun 2000 A
6112984 Snavely Sep 2000 A
6131811 Gangi Oct 2000 A
6148091 DiMaria Nov 2000 A
6149055 Gatto Nov 2000 A
6170746 Brook et al. Jan 2001 B1
6195006 Bowers et al. Feb 2001 B1
6203069 Outwater et al. Mar 2001 B1
6224109 Yang May 2001 B1
6226619 Halperin et al. May 2001 B1
6232876 Maloney May 2001 B1
6250549 DeFabio, Jr. Jun 2001 B1
6265977 Vega et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266651 Woolston Jul 2001 B1
6270011 Gottfried Aug 2001 B1
6286762 Reynolds et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304856 Soga et al. Oct 2001 B1
6305603 Grunbok et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309690 Brogger et al. Oct 2001 B1
6324522 Peterson et al. Nov 2001 B2
6325292 Sehr Dec 2001 B1
6330971 Mabry et al. Dec 2001 B1
6338053 Uehara et al. Jan 2002 B2
6346885 Curkendall Feb 2002 B1
6357662 Helton et al. Mar 2002 B1
6402029 Gangi Jun 2002 B1
6415978 McAllister Jul 2002 B1
6431439 Suer et al. Aug 2002 B1
6480108 McDonald Nov 2002 B2
6494367 Zacharias Dec 2002 B1
6505094 Pape et al. Jan 2003 B2
6557758 Monico May 2003 B1
6559620 Zhou et al. May 2003 B2
6591252 Young Jul 2003 B1
6594475 Anvekar et al. Jul 2003 B1
6676017 Smith, III Jan 2004 B1
6686881 Lu et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700493 Robinson Mar 2004 B1
6707381 Maloney Mar 2004 B1
6714121 Moore Mar 2004 B1
6735324 McKinley et al. May 2004 B1
6750765 van Wijk Jun 2004 B1
6758403 Keys et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763996 Rakers et al. Jul 2004 B2
6774811 Kaufman et al. Aug 2004 B2
6816075 Grunes et al. Nov 2004 B2
6847892 Zhou et al. Jan 2005 B2
6956538 Moore Oct 2005 B2
7005968 Bridgelall Feb 2006 B1
7019644 Barrie Mar 2006 B2
7114656 Garver Oct 2006 B1
7129837 Shannon et al. Oct 2006 B2
7136832 Li et al. Nov 2006 B2
7156312 Becker et al. Jan 2007 B2
7158038 Fujie Jan 2007 B2
7267262 Brown Sep 2007 B1
7298264 Kuzma et al. Nov 2007 B1
8234185 Davis, Jr. Jul 2012 B2
20010000019 Bowers et al. Mar 2001 A1
20010014955 Achiwa et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010018660 Sehr Aug 2001 A1
20010034717 Whitworth Oct 2001 A1
20010041214 Brogger et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010042059 Uehara et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047340 Snow et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049606 Lucarelli Dec 2001 A1
20010051905 Lucas Dec 2001 A1
20020005774 Rudolph et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020029342 Keech Mar 2002 A1
20020049507 Hameen-Anttila Apr 2002 A1
20020049656 Lancos et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052193 Chetty May 2002 A1
20020059147 Ogasawara May 2002 A1
20020073044 Singhal Jun 2002 A1
20020077956 Solhelm Jun 2002 A1
20020107610 Kaehler et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111819 Li et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123955 Andreski Sep 2002 A1
20020143635 Goodwin Oct 2002 A1
20020158751 Bormaster Oct 2002 A1
20020161666 Fraki et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165817 Rackson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188702 Short et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020190862 Berquist et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030007464 Balani Jan 2003 A1
20030034390 Linton et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030069648 Douglas et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030105555 Lunak et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120745 Katagishi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030195818 Howell et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030220885 Lucarelli et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040088231 Davis, Jr. May 2004 A1
20040098350 Labrou et al. May 2004 A1
20040122735 Meshkin Jun 2004 A1
20040171381 Inselberg Sep 2004 A1
20050289061 Kulakowski et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060077062 Andrechak Apr 2006 A1
20060190384 Gurley et al. Aug 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
199855970 Oct 1998 WO
200188884 Nov 2000 WO
200101706 Jan 2001 WO
200157807 Aug 2001 WO
200172107 Oct 2001 WO
200184268 Nov 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
2 Groups With the Same Reid/Holography Licence Tags Idea, Holography News, Dec. 2002.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Rejection; U.S. Appl. No. 10/694,311, dated Oct. 29, 2007.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Response to Non-Final Rejection; U.S. Appl. No. 10/694,311, dated Jan. 29, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Final Rejection; U.S. Appl. No. 10/694,311, dated Apr. 2, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Appeal Brief; U.S. Appl. No. 10/694,311, dated Nov. 3, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Examiner's Answer; U.S. Appl. No. 10/694,311, dated Mar. 13, 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Reply to Examiner's Answer; U.S. Appl. No. 10/694,311, dated May 13, 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Decision on Appeal; U.S. Appl. No. 10/694,311, dated Oct. 27, 2011.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Request to Reopen Prosecution; U.S. Appl. No. 10/694,311, dated Dec. 27, 2011.
Horngren, Charles T. et al.; Introduction to Financial Accounting, Revised 3rd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1988.
Borland Paradox for Windows User's Guide, Borland International, Inc., 1994.
Riley, David D., Data Abstraction and Structure, An Introduction to Computer Science II, Boyd and Fraser Publishing Company, 1987.
White, Ron; How Computers Work, Millennium Ed. Que Corporation, Sep. 1999.
Derfler, Frank J., et al; How Networks Work, Millennium Ed., Que Corporation, Jan. 2000.
Gralla, Preston, How the Internet Works, Millennium Ed., Que Corporation, Aug. 1999.
Roussos, et al.; A Case Study in Pervasive Retail; WMC, Sep. 28, 2002.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130147607 A1 Jun 2013 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 12950585 Nov 2010 US
Child 13758933 US
Parent 11086943 Mar 2005 US
Child 12950585 US
Parent 10038292 Jan 2002 US
Child 11086943 US