Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The present invention relates to a system for the management of equipment, and particularly to the management of sports equipment. The invention identifies inventory, tracks inventory during the conversion from its status from inventory to valued asset, and provides a provenance for items of sports memorabilia.
Tracing its origins to the trading cards children would collect and trade of their favorite professional athletes, the sports memorabilia market is now a huge industry. Sports enthusiasts will pay large sums of money for items associated with their favorite teams and players. A visit to any professional sporting venue reveals stores selling replica jerseys. Labels sewn into the jerseys stating “Official” or “Authentic” are intended to convince the purchaser that the item is identical to the one worn by their favorite player. Even more valuable to a collector is an item actually worn or used in a game. Collectors today will pay much more for a jersey or other piece of equipment used in a game.
As in the antique industry, with sports memorabilia, the history of an item is important when calculating value. For example, a civil war era pistol is a valuable item to a collector. A civil war era pistol owned by U.S. Grant or Robert E. Lee would be worth considerably more. An item separate from such a pistol that establishes a history of ownership is called provenance. In the sports memorabilia industry provenance can enhance the value of an item. For example, if a player sets a record in a game, the jersey he wears while breaking that record will be valuable. After the game, some person must take possession of the jersey and deliver it to a prospective buyer with some assurance that the jersey is the one worn in the game. Because of the potential money at stake, there is incentive for dishonesty.
One of the main concerns for this industry is authenticity. A common method of authentication is to have the athlete sign an item for sale. According to information on the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) website more than fifty percent of autographed memorabilia may be forged. The forged items are often provided with forged certificates of authenticity and photographs of the athlete signing a similar item. Unfortunately, unless the collector receives the item directly from the athlete there is often no way of being sure of authenticity.
A professional sports team is operated as a business. Identifying and exploiting new revenue sources is critical to success. It is also important to minimize expenses.
There is a need for a system which can account for every piece of equipment owned by a team and the use of that equipment. U.S. Pat. No. 6,195,006 (herein incorporated by reference) to Bowers et al. discloses an inventory system using RFID tags. This system can account for every piece of inventory and provide circulation status. U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,351 (herein incorporated by reference) to Yabuki discloses a system for providing information about exhibition objects. These systems could be adapted for use with the equipment used by a sports team but neither of these systems would be able to identify a piece of sports memorabilia and provide a record of its use in a game. There is a need for a system which can identify a piece of equipment used in a game which can subsequently be sold as a piece of sports memorabilia. There is a further need for a system which can provide the provenance of an item of sports memorabilia. The provenance provides a history of the item as well as authentication. This invention fills these needs.
The invention is a system and method of managing equipment. The invention identifies inventory, tracks inventory outflows and inflows, and manages inventory during the conversion from its status from inventory to valued asset to establish the provenance of the piece of equipment. The system incorporates a tagging device to attach identification tags to each piece of equipment. A reading device such as a scanner, is used to read the identification tags and this information is ultimately relayed to an equipment server. An input device (which could be the reading device) is used to input information to the equipment server. The equipment server runs the equipment management program.
In use, the system first receives equipment into inventory. The equipment is then identified by group and type. Equipment groups are user defined labels (e.g. game jerseys, boxing gloves, shorts). Equipment types have any number of fixed (e.g. catalog item number) and optional properties (e.g. size). The collection of all of the equipment is the inventory.
If not already present, an identification tag is affixed to each piece of equipment. Each identification tag is then scanned. The scanned value is then assigned an equipment group and equipment type. These values are sent to the equipment server and stored in an inventory database. This process is repeated for each piece of equipment.
Next the equipment is issued to an individual. Each piece of equipment is scanned, or identified as it is issued to an individual. Using the input device, the individual's profile is accessed and the piece of equipment is registered to that individual. A time and date stamp is included.
Finally, the equipment is returned. Each piece of equipment is scanned as it is returned. Using the input device, the piece of equipment is indicated as returned and whether the equipment was used in a value-enhancing event.
The equipment management program may indicate whether the piece of equipment has been transformed into a valued asset, or whether the piece of equipment should be returned to inventory to be reassigned later.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate the embodiments of the present invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
The physical components of the system can be seen in
Scanning device 14 is used to read the identification tag 12. The scanning device 14 can be any type of scanning device, but in the preferred embodiment the scanning device 14 is a barcode reader. The invention will also work with a bulk type scanner capable of scanning many pieces of equipment simultaneously.
The scanning device 14 is in communication with a handheld personal computer (PC) 16. The PC 16 is connected to the scanning device 14 by any acceptable means, but in the preferred embodiment a radio frequency switch 18 is used. The scanning device 14 can also be connected by a hard-wired attachment such as a serial cable or USB cable, or by a wireless device such as by infrared communication. The scanning device 14 can also be integrated directly into the PC 16.
In the preferred embodiment, the PC 16 is connected to an application server 20 by a hard-wired (serial or USB cable) attachment through a cradle 22. Any other suitable attachment means can be used including RF and IR connections. The application server 20 interacts with a web browser 24 allowing remote access.
The scanning device 14 and the PC 16 can be operated using any suitable operating system, but in the preferred embodiment MICROSOFT WINDOWS CE is used. The application server and web browser can use any suitable program but in the preferred embodiment MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT AND INTERNET EXPLORER are used, respectively. The equipment management program runs on the application server 20 and can be any inventory management program capable of being customized.
The equipment management program is used to organize and store information. Information is stored in equipment management databases. The information in the databases is used by an application server to generate different reports.
The program stores information in two types of databases. The first database is the equipment database. The second database is the individual database. The equipment database stores information for each piece of equipment. The first component of information is an identification code. This information corresponds to the portable unique identifier located on the piece of equipment. The next component is an asset flag that can be turned on and off. A status component is either activated or deactivated. Equipment group is a user-defined label. For example an equipment group can be designated “Practice Jersey”, “Indoor Shoes”, “Boxing Gloves”, “Helmet”, “Home Game Jersey”, “Soccer Shorts”, “Baseball Bat”, etc. Equipment type consists of any number of fixed and optional properties. Fixed properties can be information such as the catalog number. Optional properties include items such as size or sleeve length. Also included in the equipment database is assignment information.
The individual database has information on each individual in the system. This information includes identification of the individual, asset creation status, equipment preferences, and equipment assignments.
The system is used to manage equipment and identify assets. Referring to
The next step is to issue the equipment. This process is shown in
The return of equipment is similar to the issue equipment process. This process is shown in
The equipment program uses a two-step process to designate a piece of equipment an asset. Using the input device the asset flag can be turned on for an equipment group. Indeed, with the desire by collectors and sports fans to possess “authentic” jerseys or equipment, even equipment that is unassigned in inventory can become valuable. All equipment in that group then becomes a potential asset. The next step is to set the asset status in the individual profiles. The default setting in all individual profiles turns the asset flag off when a piece of equipment is assigned to that individual. For a specifically identified individual, the default setting is reversed and the asset flag stays turned on when the equipment is assigned to that individual. Generally, only the team stars would have this asset setting.
The equipment management program creates a history file for each piece of equipment. The history file includes information relating to the assignment and use of the piece of equipment. Such history information may include, but is not limited to, the name of the individual using the equipment, the dates and times of use, the opposing team or opposing player, various records achieved or broken during the use of the equipment, etc. This information is stored in the equipment application server and can be accessed via the Internet using a web browser. Accordingly, a person selling an asset as an article of sports memorabilia may access the history file and demonstrate authenticity as well as the provenance of the item.
The equipment management program also has an order form generation feature. When a piece of equipment is deactivated and disposed of (i.e. broken or sold as an asset) the program may automatically generate a complete order form, or may electronically place an order for replacement equipment using the equipment profile.
The equipment management program also has a post activity update feature. For example, a future Hall of Fame athlete can create a market demand for game-worn equipment. A report is generated detailing every piece of equipment ever assigned to the individual. The results are then filtered by equipment group. The desired results are then deactivated and designated for disposal.
The equipment management system of the present invention provides accountability for every piece of equipment. It should be noted that the invention is drawn to an improved method of using a known system to manage equipment. The above described system is indicative of the type of system the invention is intended to work with, but should not be construed as the only type of system the method works with. The invention is intended to function with any type of equipment management system. The improvement involves the ability to identify or flag a piece of equipment assigned to an asset-creating individual. In the preferred embodiment, an asset-creating individual for a sports team is identified as any player that can create a market for game-used equipment. In most cases this would be a fan favorite player. It is specifically pointed out that the system may also function with athletes participating in non-team, individual sports, such as boxing, tennis, swimming, track and field, etc. A potential asset is defined as any piece of equipment which becomes valuable when used in an asset creating event. In the preferred embodiment potential assets are items like game jerseys, shoes, helmets, boxing gloves, shorts, baseball bats, baseball gloves, shirts, hats, etc.
The improvement is shown in the flowchart of
In view of the foregoing, it will be seen that the several advantages of the invention are achieved and attained. The preferred embodiment and alternatives were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. As various modifications could be made in the constructions and methods herein described and illustrated without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the foregoing description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative rather than limiting. For example, the system and method could be used on the set of a movie or on a political campaign. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/101,010, filed Aug. 10, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,839,344, issued Nov. 17, 2020, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/758,933, filed Feb. 4, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,049,365, issued Aug. 14, 2018, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/950,585, filed Nov. 19, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,370,225, issued Feb. 5, 2013, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/086,943, filed Mar. 22, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,840,453, issued Nov. 23, 2010, entitled “EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM,” which is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 10/038,292, filed Jan. 4, 2002, now abandoned, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,185, issued Jul. 31, 2012, U.S. Pat. No. 8,898,077, issued Nov. 25, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,082,124, issued Jul. 14, 2015, and U.S. Pat. No. 10,229,384, issued Mar. 12, 2019, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACKING AUTHENTICATED ITEMS.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5629981 | Nerlikar | May 1997 | A |
6497656 | Evans et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6608911 | Lofgren et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609656 | Elledge | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612928 | Bradford et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6709333 | Bradford et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6738903 | Haines | May 2004 | B1 |
6809646 | Lee | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6842106 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6857714 | Hohberger et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6901304 | Swan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902111 | Han et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6935560 | Andreasson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943678 | Muirhead | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963282 | Yeates et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6967566 | Weston et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7004385 | Douglass | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013290 | Ananian | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7053771 | Hussmann | May 2006 | B2 |
7069251 | Bartz et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7070112 | Beenau et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072864 | Brake, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7093767 | Faenza, Jr. et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100052 | Ghazarian | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113088 | Frick et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113095 | Kuzma et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7119659 | Bonalle et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123696 | Lowe | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126470 | Clift et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137000 | Hohberger et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7138915 | Morita et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7140542 | Andreasson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146112 | Phipps et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149503 | Aarnio et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156301 | Bonalle et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7170391 | Lane et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171192 | Song et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173515 | Ohki et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7175081 | Andreasson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182256 | Andreasson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187267 | Cole | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7187286 | Morris et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194438 | Sovio et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202789 | Stilp | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7212119 | Chipchase et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7213766 | Ryan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221258 | Lane et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7230519 | Coughlin et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7230534 | Elledge | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232066 | Andreasson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239226 | Berardi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7239242 | Ghosh | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246744 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246748 | Feuerman et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249112 | Berardi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252230 | Sheikh et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7253735 | Gengel et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258276 | Linton et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259679 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269361 | Huss et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273181 | White | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276388 | Arneson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7278572 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281657 | Patel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283048 | Stilp | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284692 | Douglass | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7293705 | Linton et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
10049365 | Davis, Jr. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10839344 | Davis, Jr. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
Entry |
---|
Petition for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,185 dated Jan. 22, 2021, 77 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1001—U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,185 (Issued Jul. 31, 2012—Davis), 15 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1002—U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,185, 281 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1003—Declaration of Anthony J. Wechselberger, dated Jan. 20, 2021, 101 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1004—CV of Anthony J. Wechselberger, 10 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1005—U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0140349—Shaw, dated Jul. 22, 2004, 15 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1006—U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0093497—Arangio, dated May 13, 2004, 16 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1007—U.S. Pat. No. 6,681,990—Vogler, et al., dated Jan. 27, 2004, 11 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1008—U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0046543—Houston et al., dated Mar. 6, 2003, 23 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1009—U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0220885—Lucarelli et al., dated Nov. 27, 2003, 33 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1010—U.S. Appl. No. 10/038,292, filed Jan. 4, 2002, 24 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1011—U.S. Appl. No. 10/038,292, 389 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1012—Redline Comparison of U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,185 and U.S. Appl. No. 10/038,292, 34 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1013—Prova Group, Inc v The Roscoe Company 1:19-cv-06971 (Lex Machina), 2 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1014—Poser, “The Stock Exchanges of the United States and Europe: Automation, Globalization, and Consolidation”, Published by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, 2014, 44 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1015—Oct. 1990 Issue of “IL Magazine”, 14 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1016—Nov. 1994 Issue of “IL Magazine”, 6 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1017—Aug. 1995 Issue of “IL Magazine”, 7 pages. |
IPR Exhibit TRSA 1018—U.S. Pat. No. 6,735,324—McKinley, et al., dated May 11, 2004, 7 pages. |
Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response, mailed Feb. 16, 2021 from the USPTO—Patent Trial and Appeal Board assigning Case No. IPR2021-00382, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210073720 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16101010 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 16950362 | US | |
Parent | 13758933 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 16101010 | US | |
Parent | 12950585 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 13758933 | US | |
Parent | 11086943 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12950585 | US | |
Parent | 10038292 | Jan 2002 | US |
Child | 11086943 | US |