Not applicable.
Surgeons have identified and studies have shown, laparoscopic techniques require greater concentration and place greater mental and physical stress on surgeons than open surgery. The tools that laparoscopic surgeons must use are difficult to use and because of suboptimal design, they may actually be doing harm to the highly trained physician. Additionally, poor laparoscopic tools increase physician fatigue, creating potential for errors that may harm the patient.
Specialized instruments are required for laparoscopic surgery due to the small ports. The design of these instruments is critical to the result of the surgery. Current laparoscopic instruments have been found to be very poorly designed ergonomically and it is likely that ergonomics were not considered at all. Some practicing laparoscopic surgeons frequently experience post operation pain or numbness. This is generally attributable to pressure points on the laparoscopic tool handle. Furthermore, four different handle designs used on laparoscopic tools (shank, pistol, axial, and ring handle) have been found to result in either painful pressure spots or caused extreme ulnar deviation.
Compared to general surgery, laparoscopic surgery is a new practice. Therefore, the tools available to perform the procedures are not yet perfected. Limited work has been done by others to improve both the tools and procedures used in laparoscopy; however, an optimized tool, based on task analysis of laparoscopic surgery and sound ergonomic principles has not been prototyped and tested fully to date.
Furthermore, non-ergonomic tool handles often cause pain and discomfort and also result in painful pressure spots. It would be beneficial to have a laparoscopic tool with an ergonomic handle, an intuitive hand/tool interface, such as a control sphere, and an articulating end effector. It would also be beneficial to have an ergonomic tool handle with an intuitive hand/tool interface for use with other types of tools.
In one embodiment, the present invention relates to a laparoscopic apparatus. The apparatus comprises a handle having a body portion, a top surface, opposite bottom surface, a proximal and distal end and a shaft projecting from the distal end of the handle, the shaft having a proximal and distal end. The apparatus further comprises a control sphere located on the handle and an end effector located at the distal end of the shaft, wherein the end effector is connected to the control sphere such that movements made to the control sphere control movement of the end effector.
In another embodiment, the present invention relates to an ergonomic handle apparatus for use with a tool. The handle apparatus comprises a base having a body portion, a top surface, opposite bottom surface, a proximal and a distal end, where the top surface of the base being contoured to compliment the natural curve of the palm. The handle apparatus further comprises a control sphere located on the base, wherein the control sphere can be moved by one or more of a user's fingers to indicate direction and at least one lever projecting from the bottom surface, wherein the lever may be actuated by a user.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention relates to a laparoscopic apparatus. The apparatus comprises a handle having a body portion, a top surface, opposite bottom surface, a proximal and distal end, where the top surface of the base is contoured to compliment the natural curve of the palm. The apparatus further includes a shaft projecting from the distal end of the handle, the shaft having a proximal and distal end and a control sphere located on the handle. The control sphere can be moved by one or more of a user's fingers to indicate direction. An end effector is located at the distal end of the shaft and the end effector is connected to the control sphere such that movements made to the control sphere control movement of the end effector.
With reference to
In one embodiment, the shaft (14) is a 10 mm shaft. In this embodiment, the shaft is about 10 mm in diameter and about 40 cm long. The shaft houses the wire guides and actuation cables, described later. However, one of skill in the art will appreciate that the shaft, wire guides and actuation cables are scalable and may be any size, including, but not limited to, about 3 mm and about 5 mm in diameter and about 35-55 cm long.
With reference next to
In one embodiment, the handle circumference is about 5 cm and tapered in shape. A preferred range of handle circumference is from about 4 cm to 6.5 cm. The distal end of the handle is also curved such that the tool shaft (14) is angled at about 135 degrees to increase the accuracy of pointing with the tool. However, the distal end of the handle may be curved to at any variety of angles depending on the tool that the handle is used with. The handle is designed to fit hand sizes ranging from about the 5th percentile female to about the 95th percentile male. The tool handle is described in relation to a laparoscopic instrument, however, it will be appreciated that the ergonomic tool handle (12) may be used with any variety of tools including a homeland security device, such as a sensing device, or a laser pointer for presentations.
The handle (12) is designed for comfortable use with three different hand orientations. The first hand position is such that the thumb controls the sphere, and the fingers are wrapped around the handle and squeeze the grip (20). The second hand position uses the thumb to squeeze the grip (20), and the fingers are wrapped across the top of the handle (12) with the index finger controlling the sphere (26). The third is a reverse grip shown in
Referring next to
The squeeze grip (20) actuates the graspers (18) at the end of the tool (10). When the grip (20) is squeezed closed, the graspers (18) close (the closed position is shown in
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
In one embodiment, the control sphere is located in at or near the center of the lateral axis of the handle and about 3-4 cm from the collet mechanism (24). In one embodiment, the control sphere is located about 3.6 cm from the collet mechanism (24) and is substantially inline with the shaft (14). In this embodiment, the actuation force needed to move the control sphere such that it moves the end effector properly between about 2 and 5 lbs, preferably about 3 lbs.
With reference to
With reference to
In one embodiment, a portion of the spherical end effector (16) is removed leaving approximately ½-¾ of a sphere. However, it can be appreciated that different amounts of a spherical end effector may be removed. A small hole (40) extends through the end effector to allow the grasper cable to pass. In the embodiment having a spherical end effector (16) that is approximately about 10 mm in diameter, the small hole (40) is approximately about 2 mm in diameter. The spherical end effector (16) is split across the equator for attachment of control cables (42) described in more detail below. Four attachment mechanisms, such as screws, hold the end effector (16) together and secure the control cables (42) to the end effector (16).
With reference to
In one embodiment, the control sphere (26) is about three times larger than the end effector (16). For example, if the spherical end effector (16) is about 10 mm in diameter, the control sphere (26) is about 30 mm diameter. The difference in size enables the user to have more precise control over the end effector (16). Also, in one embodiment, the control sphere (26) is in-line with the actuating effector (16).
In one embodiment, the control cables (42) running through the shaft (14) are rotated a total of about 180° when passed through the wire guides (44). This rotation ensures that when the control sphere (26) is moved left, the end effector (16) will move left, and when the control sphere (26) is moved forward, the end effector (16) will move up.
The four control cables (42) have swaged balls attached to each end. In the embodiment with an end effector (16) having a diameter of about 10 mm, the swaged balls and each end of the four control cables (42) are approximately about 2 mm. Both the end effector and control sphere are split along their equators. The swaged ends of the control cables (42) seed into depressions (39) in each hemisphere of the end effector (16). Four attachment mechanisms, such as screws, hold the two hemispheres of the end effector (16) together and secure the control cables (42). The control cables (42) connect to the control sphere (26) also seed into depressions (37) in the control sphere (26). One attachment mechanism, such as a screw, holds the top half of the control sphere (26) in place and secures the control cables (42). A screw cover may be used to hide the screw and has a small tactile element for tactile feedback.
The tool shaft (14) is able to rotate 360°. Normally, rotation of the control ball would cause the control cables to become tangled; consequently, control of the end effector (16) would be lost. The tool (10) allows the shaft (14) and actuating end effector (16) (along with the cables (42)) to rotate about the tool handle (12) without becoming entangled.
With continued reference to
With reference to
With reference to
The handle (12) can comprise multiple components or may be one component. In one embodiment, the handle (12) comprises a right half of handle (88), left half of handle (90) and a handle grip (90). One of skill in the art will appreciate that the handle (12) may be made up of any number of components or may be a unitary handle.
From the foregoing, it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to attain all the ends and objects hereinabove set forth together with other advantages which are obvious and which are inherent in the structure. It will be understood that certain features and subcombinations are of utility and may be employed without reference to other features and subcombinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope of the claims. Since many possible embodiments may be made of the invention without departing from the scope thereof, it is to be understood that all matter herein set forth or shown in the accompanying drawings is to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/056,021 filed Feb. 11, 2005, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/544,286 filed on Feb. 12, 2004, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3730185 | Cook et al. | May 1973 | A |
3888004 | Coleman | Jun 1975 | A |
4258716 | Sutherland | Mar 1981 | A |
4320761 | Haddad | Mar 1982 | A |
4439649 | Cecchi | Mar 1984 | A |
4672964 | Dee et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4688555 | Wardle | Aug 1987 | A |
4763669 | Jaeger | Aug 1988 | A |
4838853 | Parisi | Jun 1989 | A |
4852550 | Koller et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4861332 | Parisi | Aug 1989 | A |
4872456 | Hasson | Oct 1989 | A |
4877026 | de Laforcade | Oct 1989 | A |
4880015 | Nierman | Nov 1989 | A |
4940468 | Petillo | Jul 1990 | A |
4978333 | Broadwin et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4986825 | Bays et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5024652 | Dumenek et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026387 | Thomas | Jun 1991 | A |
5112299 | Pascaloff | May 1992 | A |
5133736 | Bales, Jr. et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5166787 | Irion | Nov 1992 | A |
5174300 | Bales et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176697 | Hasson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5209747 | Knoepfler | May 1993 | A |
5224954 | Watts et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5254130 | Poncet et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258007 | Spetzler et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5275615 | Rose | Jan 1994 | A |
5281220 | Blake, III | Jan 1994 | A |
5282806 | Haber et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5282807 | Knoepfler | Feb 1994 | A |
5282826 | Quadri | Feb 1994 | A |
5300081 | Young et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308358 | Bond et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314445 | Heidmueller nee Degwitz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318589 | Lichtman | Jun 1994 | A |
5330502 | Hassler et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5350355 | Sklar | Sep 1994 | A |
5350391 | Iacovelli | Sep 1994 | A |
5354311 | Kambin et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5368606 | Marlow et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374277 | Hassler | Dec 1994 | A |
5383888 | Zvenyatsky et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5403342 | Tovey | Apr 1995 | A |
5405344 | Williamson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5474571 | Lang | Dec 1995 | A |
5536251 | Evard et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5817119 | Klieman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827323 | Klieman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5882294 | Storz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6443973 | Whitman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
RE38335 | Aust et al. | Nov 2003 | E |
7131985 | Manhes | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7156846 | Dycus et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7250027 | Barry | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20030236549 | Bonadio et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20060190027 | Downey et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
43-00-307 | Jul 1994 | DE |
296 23 921 | Aug 2000 | DE |
0 434 793 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0 434 793 | Jul 1991 | EP |
577-423 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 902 652 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 918 489 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 366 705 | Dec 2003 | EP |
2681775 | Apr 1993 | FR |
WO 9102493 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO 9307816 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9420034 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 2005079333 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Novare Surgical Systems, Inc., “EndoLink™ Articulating Instruments,” 2005, 1 page. |
M.A. van Veelen, “Handle for laparoscopic instrument,” Medisign Delft Program for research and development of products in Healthcare,: Aug. 20, 1999, 3 pages. |
Microline Pentax, “Microline Announces the World's First Reposable Deflexable Instruments,” 2009, 1 page. |
Novare Surgical Systems, Inc., “RealHand High Dexterity (HD) instruments,” Oct. 7, 2009, 1 page. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion International Application No. PCT/US2005/004517, mailed Nov. 7, 2007, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090312605 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60544286 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11056021 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 12546404 | US |