Ergonomic handle

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8850662
  • Patent Number
    8,850,662
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 21, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 7, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
The invention provides an ergonomic handle for precision, surgical, and dental tools including electro-surgical devices and surgical devices used in microsurgery designed to facilitate the positioning of the user's hand grip comprising a longitudinally extending body substantially oval in cross-section and being provided with four, substantially concave indentations positioned towards the proximal end of the handle, a first concave indentation being provided along a top surface of the handle, second and third indentations being provided along lateral surfaces, and a fourth indentation being provided along the bottom surface of the body respectively and positioned relative to each other to provide a contiguous interface respectively with the user's thumb, index finger and middle finger.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to handles. More particularly, the invention relates to handles for precision, surgical, and dental tools including electro-surgical devices and surgical devices used in microsurgery.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Standard scalpel handles with flat gripping arrangements do not provide contoured gripping surfaces to keep the index finger, thumb and middle finger in place. Moreover, standard scalpel handles with flat body handle gripping arrangements can lead to slippage of the fingers onto the blade or an uncontrolled rolling between the fingers.


Many innovative scalpel handle designs have been implemented in order to address issues related to ergonomic requirements of a scalpel grip. Thus, there have been several scalpel designs to address the protection of the scalpel user from the danger of the sharp blade.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,531,754 to Shackelford, Sr. et al describes a retractable blade mounted on a blade holder mechanism housed within a cover housing. The blade holder mechanism includes a resilient spring clip that is biased against the sheath.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,101,382 to George et al comprises a retractable scalpel device with two releasable latching elements. When the scalpel blade is in an extended position, each releasable latching element is accessible for depression by finger pressure to cause retraction of the extended blade. The releasable latching elements are located on opposite edges (top and bottom) of a cover housing and about halfway along its length. The releasable latching elements must be depressed at the same time for the extended scalpel blade to be retracted into the housing.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,317 B2 to Kanodia et al comprises a disposable guarded surgical scalpel, which includes a handle with a blade fixed to it and a sliding mounted guard. When the scalpel is in use, the guard is moved to a retracted position where the blade is exposed: the guard locks in this position. When not in use the guard is moved to an extended position where the blade is covered. The guard has grooves on the outer surface to provide a better grip for the surgeon.


U.S. Design Pat. No. D101,325 to Brown is directed to a new, original and ornamental design for a scalpel. The design is characterized by the configuration of the handle wherein the walls and upper edge are transversely grooved or serrated in conjunction with the tapering beveled upper and lower edges.


U.S. D535,749 attributable to Yaniv et al depicts an ornamental design for a scalpel.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,578,050 to Webb is directed to a rubber sleeve for use over a scalpel handle.


U.S. Design Pat. No. D457,630 S to Lehtonen is directed to a scalpel handle which makes no provision for indentations for the positioning of the fingers.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,150,754 to Ziemer is directed to the alignment of a scalpel blade without the necessity for eye contact. To achieve this object the invention proposes a handle region comprising three lateral faces, which are disposed such that a cross section with a triangular envelope results for the handle region, and at least one of the lateral faces is provided with tactile identifying features. The triangular envelope of the cross section of the handle region facilitates a proper holding of the scalpel blade holder between middle finger, thumb and index finger, the scalpel blade holder and thus the scalpel fixed thereto being able to assume only three different rotational states about the center axis of the handle region of the scalpel blade holder, with respect to the fingers. The limitation in movement to only three rotational states allows the user to determine the alignment of the scalpel blade holder and of the scalpel affixed thereto via his fingers by means of his sense of touch. The handle has an arc-triangular shape. The rounded corners contribute to a better grip, and in addition prevent the user from hurting himself on the corners or damaging protective gloves, and do not need to be dimensioned as big as tactile identifying features designed as recesses.


US Patent Application 2006/0041266 to Sullivan et al comprises a distal section of a surgical scalpel handle which has an enlarged finger pressure section. This section is about one third of the length of the entire handle and has small protrusions at its right and left sidewalls. The finger pressure section has a slight bottom curvature and an indentation at its top face. The indentation is as wide and long as a pad of an adult index finger i.e. the pad from the tip of the index finger to the first knuckle. The top face of the finger pressure section is wider than the top face of the body section. The body section of the handle is triangular. The right side face and the left side face form a “V,” or an acute angle of 20-60 degrees having a tip line.


Flat or triangular shaped devices are not comfortable for the user, as these handles do not sufficiently cater to the ergonomic requirements of a grip. Flat body handles provide textured gripping surfaces for the fingers, but are too small or too narrow to grip comfortably for extended periods of time, or once gripped restrict the free movement of the hand. Furthermore, flat body handle gripping arrangements can only be used basically in one position without the danger of slippage or rolling between the fingers accompanied by the risk of consequent injury to the user or the patient. Grips having triangular cross-sections may present an ease of orientation positioning, however, they fall short of providing ergonomically comfortable working solutions. One edge of the triangular shaped device can dig into a user's finger.


While alleviating many of the problems related to efficiently using a scalpel, such as positioning and maintaining a desired grip, the grips disclosed in the prior art do not address the need to minimize the fatigue due to the need to adjust relative position of fingers and maintain an assured operational control and alignment of the scalpel blade during surgery, and, furthermore, these grips do nothing to eliminate the need for additional personnel to maintain whatever mechanical, or sanitary features of the prior art.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Therefore the objectives of the present invention are to obviate the disadvantages of prior art scalpel handles and to provide a scalpel handle which has uniquely spaced indentations that accommodate finger form rather than finger pressure allowing the scalpel handle to be gripped comfortably for long periods of time, allowing the handle to be gripped in alternative positions, unhindered by either dry or wet gloves, providing simplicity of manufacture, and requiring minimal or no maintenance.


It is a further object of the present invention to provide scalpel handle which has four molded concave indentations proximal to the operational end of the instrument, further having an oval shape with an additional user index finger support, significantly facilitating precise surgical operations.


The present invention achieves the above objectives by providing an ergonomic handle for precision, surgical, and dental tools designed to facilitate the positioning of the user's finger grip comprising a longitudinally extending body substantially oval in cross-section and being provided with four, substantially concave indentations positioned towards the proximal end of the handle, a first concave indentation being provided along a top surface of the handle, second and third indentations being provided along lateral surfaces, and a fourth indentation being provided along a bottom surface of the body, said indentations being positioned relative to each other to provide a contiguous interface respectively with the user's thumb, index finger and middle finger.


In a preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided an ergonomic handle wherein the surface area of the top of the handle is contoured such that extending from its distal end toward its proximal end and approaching the proximal end there is provided a concave indentation which extends and merges into an elevated ridge-like surface support which tapers angularly towards the proximal end of the handle.


In another preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided an ergonomic handle wherein the four indentations are spaced about 90° apart from each other.


In a further preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided an ergonomic handle wherein the longitudinally extending body has an axis and the first concave indentation is cut deeper into the body towards the axis than at least one of the other indentations.


In a further preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided an ergonomic handle wherein the handle is provided with the means at its proximal end for attachment thereto of interchangeable surgical blades and instruments along the longitudinal axis.


In yet a further preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided an ergonomic handle wherein the ridge-like surface support is both elevated and has a projecting convex curve so as to allow for positioning of the user's index finger sufficiently close to the proximal end of the handle body while preventing the index finger from slipping toward the proximal end.


In a most preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided an ergonomic handle wherein the surgical tool is a scalpel.


The invention will now be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments with reference to the following illustrative figures so that it may be more fully understood.


With specific reference now to the figures in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of the handle according to the invention;



FIG. 2 is a side view of the handle and sectional views thereof;



FIG. 3 is an exploded multi-sectional perspective view of the sections in FIG. 2;



FIG. 4 is a top, cross-section view of the handle according to the invention;



FIG. 5A is a left side view of the handle according to the invention, showing the dorsal indentation and bottom indentation;



FIG. 5B is a right side view of the handle according to the invention, showing the dorsal indentation and bottom indentation;



FIG. 5C is the distal end view of the handle according to the invention;



FIG. 5D is the proximal end view of the handle according to the invention, showing the shank thereof;



FIG. 5E is the top view of the handle according to the invention;



FIG. 5F is the bottom view of the handle according to the invention, showing the lateral indentations;



FIG. 6A illustrates the danger of a finger slipping and sustaining an injury when using a standard scalpel handle;



FIG. 6B illustrates the use of the handle according to the invention, thereby preventing the slipping of the finger;



FIG. 7A illustrates a cross-section of a hand-held prior art handle and the lack of control when a standard scalpel handle is rotated between the fingers;



FIG. 7B illustrates a cross-section of a hand-held handle and the use of the handle according to the invention when it is rotated between the fingers;



FIG. 8A illustrates the higher hand grip position on the standard scalpel handle of the prior art; and



FIG. 8B illustrates the lower hand grip position on the handle according to the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

There is seen in FIG. 1 a surgical scalpel handle 1 for use in conjunction with a disposable surgical blade 2 attachable to a shank 3 extending longitudinally from the proximal end of the handle 1. The handle 1 comprises a longitudinally extending body 4 which is substantially oval in cross-section and is formed of sequential ovals of varying width and shape. The handle has four concave indentations 5 (not visible), 6, 7, and 8 moldably formed thereinto, and adjoining the proximal end of the handle 1.


According to one embodiment of the present invention, the indentations 5 and 6 are designed to accommodate the middle finger and the thumb, respectively, and the indentations 7 and 8 are designed to generally accommodate the index finger and the middle finger respectively, thereby facilitating gripping by a user. Thus, the user fingers are free from being confined to the grip positions of the handle when in use. The general configuration of the indentation according to the embodiment of the invention allows for the user to comfortably grip the handle 1 in various gripping positions.


According to one embodiment of the invention, the top indentation 7 as illustrated in FIGS. 1, 5A, and 5B is designed to accommodate the index finger 9 of a right handed user, as seen in FIG. 6B, engaging most of the ball and tip thereof. The lateral indentation 6 as illustrated in FIG. 1 and FIG. 5F is designed to accommodate the thumb 10 of the user, as seen in FIG. 7B, engaging most of the ball thereof. The bottom indentation 8 as illustrated in FIGS. 1, 5A, and 5B, is designed to accommodate a portion of the middle finger 11 of the user, as seen in FIG. 7B, at the first joint on a side adjoining the positioning of the index finger. The lateral indentation 5 as illustrated in FIG. 5F, is designed to accommodate a portion of the middle finger 12 of the user, as seen in FIG. 7B. The positioning of the lateral indentations is reversed in the case of a left-handed user. Thus, the accommodation of the lateral indentations for the middle finger and the thumb, involve the engagement of the same parts of the said middle finger and thumb as detailed above in respect to the right handed user.


The top concave indentation 7 shown in FIGS. 1, 5A, and 5B has a preferred maximum depth of about 2.0 mm below the surface of the handle, which is preferably slightly deeper than the lateral indentations 5 and 6 as shown in FIG. 5F which have a preferred maximum depth of about 1.0 mm and the bottom indentation 8 as shown in FIGS. 1 and 5A which has a preferred maximum depth of about 0.3 mm at its lowest point.


In FIGS. 1, 5A, and 5B there is also seen an additional ridge-like surface support 13 which acts as an abutment for index finger of the user, thereby providing an assured grip into the soft pad of the finger and to prevent slippage when cutting and performing close up work. The ridge-like surface support 13 is disposed at the front face of the proximal end of the handle and forms a curve to the highest and proximal point of the top indentation. The midpoint of the ridge-like surface support 13 is seen in section AA in FIG. 2 having a preferred horizontal length of about 6.1 mm and a preferred vertical height of about 9.2 mm.


There is seen in FIG. 2 a cross section A-A disposed at the foremost point of the ridge-like surface support 13 and most proximally to the proximal end of the handle 1, and the characteristic pear shape thereof is also shown in FIG. 3. The section A-A has a preferred vertical height of about 9.2 mm and a preferred horizontal width of about 6.1 mm. The section B-B is disposed at the second end point of the top concave indentation 7 closest to the front of the handle as depicted in FIG. 2 and its characteristic shape is illustrated in FIG. 3. The section B-B has a preferred vertical height of about 11.5 mm and a preferred horizontal width of about 6.2 mm. Although the sections A-A and B-B are disposed transversely and generally on the same longitudinal axis of the handle 1, there are nevertheless significant differences in both the height and width of the two sections; the height differential thereof being preferably about 2.3 mm and the width differential being preferably about 0.1 mm. This difference allows for the comfort and accuracy required for the index finger when disposed upon the top indentation 7.


Section C-C is disposed along the downslope curve and inward to the top concave indentation as illustrated in FIG. 2 and the characteristic shape thereof is also shown in FIG. 3. The section CC has a preferred vertical height of about 10.6 mm and a preferred horizontal width of about 6.3. The section D-D is disposed at a middle point along the top concave indentation 7 as illustrated in FIG. 2 and the characteristic shape thereof is also shown in FIG. 3. The section D-D has a preferred vertical height of about 9.7 mm and a preferred horizontal width of about 6.5. The section E-E is disposed along the upslope curve towards the top of the concave indentation 7 as illustrated in FIG. 2 and the characteristic shape thereof is also shown in FIG. 3. The section E-E has a preferred vertical height of about 11 mm and a preferred horizontal width of about 6.7. The section F-F is disposed at the highest point on the top of the concave indentation 7 as illustrated in FIG. 2 and the characteristic shape thereof is shown in FIG. 3. The section F-F has a preferred vertical height of about 12 mm and a preferred horizontal width of about 7 mm. The section G-G is substantially along the middle of the shank 3 of the handle 1 as illustrated in FIG. 2 and the characteristic shape thereof is shown in FIG. 3. The section G-G has a preferred vertical height of about 12.7 mm and a preferred horizontal width of about 8.4 mm.


The two lateral concave indentations 5 and 6 accommodating the user thumb and middle finger, respectively, are depicted in FIGS. 1 and 5F, and constitute mirror images of each other, in respect of measurement, shape and size. Notwithstanding the fact that the engagement of the thumb has a wider and broader surface area as compared to the middle finger, according to one embodiment of the invention the identical dimensions of the lateral indentations assure equal facility for both. The bottom indentation 8, as seen in FIGS. 1, 5A, and 5B allows for the follow-through, or comfortable interchangeability of the middle finger of the user from the lateral indentation to the bottom indentation. In other words, the four indentations are substantially axially aligned.



FIG. 6A illustrates the danger of finger slippage and accompanying consequent injury to the user or the patient when using standard scalpel handles as compared to the safety of the unique design of the present invention which prevents finger slippage as depicted in FIG. 6B.



FIG. 7B illustrates the advantageous maneuverability of the handle in the present invention when compared to the standard scalpel shape as depicted in FIG. 7A. The handle design, form and characteristic ergonomic grip featured in the present invention, and discussed hereabove facilitate more contact with the handle, providing gradual adjustment from vertical and horizontal surfaces of the handle, allow for safe close up work, and reduces the possibility of sudden finger slippage or uncontrollable rolling between the user fingers. Moreover, the configuration of the handle of the present invention allows the user to rotate the handle without the handle rolling over uncontrollably, and further allows the user to effortlessly control the handle while the handle remains stable.


The present invention allows for a closer anchoring of the user's pinky finger as a support for greater precision work. The closer the user's grip is to the front of the handle for close up work, the easier are his opportunities to effectively use the instrument.


Thus, FIG. 8A illustrates the necessity for a higher, or undesired finger grip position, in relation to the cutting area, to be maintained when using a scalpel of standard design of the prior art. The lower finger grip position on the handle of the present invention allows for a comfortable finger grip extension beyond the limits of the indentations in the handle as depicted in FIG. 8B.


Moreover, rather than employing a textured grip known for the softness or porosity thereof making sterilization difficult, the handle of the present invention is manufactured of non-textured materials, according to one embodiment of the invention, thereby creating a form grip which is easy to sterilize.


It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.

Claims
  • 1. An ergonomic handle comprising a longitudinally extended body provided on its outer surface with four, substantially concave indentations that include a first concave indentation provided along a top surface of said body, which first concave indentation extends and merges into an elevated ridge surface support that is proximally positioned relative to the first concave indentation, second and third indentations being provided along lateral surfaces of the body, and a fourth indentation being provided along the bottom surface of said body, and wherein the body comprises, along a longitudinal length of said body, a plurality of sequential oval cross-sections of varying width and shape and each with an oval major diameter axis extending in a top to bottom direction, and wherein said indentations are positioned relative to each other to provide a contiguous interface relative to the user's thumb, index finger and middle finger to facilitate controlled rolling between the user's fingers, and wherein said second and third indentations are more predominantly located on lower portions of the lateral surfaces.
  • 2. The handle according to claim 1 wherein the four indentations are spaced about 90° apart from each other, with the second and third indentations each having an upper portion aligned with a minor axis of the cross-section and a maximum depth positioned in the lower portion of the lateral sides.
  • 3. The handle according to claim 1 wherein said body has a central axis and said first concave indentation is cut deeper into said body towards said axis than at least one of said other indentations.
  • 4. The handle according to claim 1 wherein said handle is a precision instrument handle configured for use with a precision instrument selected from the group consisting of ball point pen, a felt-tipped pen, a fountain pen, a pencil, a mechanical pencil, a rapidiograph, a computer stylus; a scoring instrument, an engraving tool, and a soldering device.
  • 5. The handle according to claim 1 wherein said handle is a precision instrument handle configured for use with a precision instrument selected from the group consisting of a surgical tool, a dental tool, an electro-surgical tool and a microsurgery tool.
  • 6. The handle according to claim 1 wherein said handle is a precision instrument handle configured for use with a precision instrument that is a scalpel.
  • 7. The handle according to claim 1, wherein said first, top indentation is formed on a top portion of said body so as to define a top curved end portion in a vertical cross-sectional plane extending perpendicular to a central axis of said body, and said fourth, bottom indentation is formed on a bottom portion of said body so as to also define a curved end portion in the vertical cross-sectional plane.
  • 8. The handle according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the second and third lateral indentations extends into the bottom indentation such that said at least one of said second and third lateral indentations and said bottom indentation define together a continuous middle finger reception cavity comprised of a portion of that one of the lateral indentations and a portion of the bottom indentation, and said top indentation is configured for accommodating an index finger of said user, and the other of said lateral indentations is configured for accommodating a thumb of said user.
  • 9. The handle according to claim 1, wherein one of the lateral indentations is configured for accommodating both a portion of a middle finger and a thumb of a user, said top indentation being configured for accommodating a further portion of said middle finger of said user, the other of said lateral indentations being configured for accommodating an index finger of said user and said bottom indentation being configured for accommodating said thumb of said user.
  • 10. The handle according to claim 1, wherein one of the second and third lateral indentations is configured for accommodating a portion of a thumb of a user, said top indentation being configured for accommodating a portion of a middle finger and a further portion of said thumb of said user, the other of said lateral indentations being configured for accommodating a further portion of said middle finger of said user and said bottom indentation being configured for accommodating an index finger of said user.
  • 11. The handle according to claim 1, wherein one of the second and third lateral indentations is configured for accommodating an index finger of a user, said top indentation being configured for accommodating a portion of a thumb of said user, the other of said lateral indentations being configured for accommodating a portion of a middle finger and a portion of said thumb of said user, and said bottom indentation being configured for accommodating a further portion of said middle finger of said user.
  • 12. The handle according to claim 1, wherein said top indentation has a maximum depth of 2.0 mm below a surface of the body, said lateral indentations have a maximum depth of 1.0 mm below a surface of the body, and said bottom indentation has a maximum depth of about 0.3 mm below a surface of the body.
  • 13. The handle according to claim 1, wherein said top indentation is concave and extends from a distal end of said body toward a proximal end of said body, and wherein said elevated ridge surface support has a proximal side tapering angularly down towards said proximal end of said handle.
  • 14. The handle according to claim 1, wherein the interface between an upper end of one of the second and third indentations and the top indentation is contiguous across a lateral side, longitudinally extending ridge region representing a maximum outer surface of the lateral side.
  • 15. The handle according to claim 1, wherein a distance between opposing, interior-most surfaces of said first and fourth concave indentations is greater than a lateral spacing distance of said second and third lateral surfaces at a common axial location on said body.
  • 16. The handle according to claim 1, wherein, on opposing sides of a horizontal cross-section plane extending through the lateral second and third sides and along a longitudinal central axis of extension of said body, there is defined a non-symmetrical relationship in the oval cross-section positioned at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation.
  • 17. An ergonomic handle comprising a longitudinally extended body provided on its outer surface with four, substantially concave indentations that include a first concave indentation being provided along a top surface of said body, which first concave indentation extends and merges into an elevated ridge surface support, second and third indentations being provided along lateral surfaces, and a fourth indentation being provided along the bottom surface of said body, and wherein a distance between opposing, interior-most surfaces of said first and fourth concave indentations is greater than a lateral spacing distance of said second and third lateral surfaces at a common axial location on said body, and wherein said body comprises a plurality of sequential oval cross-section of varying width and shape, and wherein said indentations are positioned relative to each other to provide a contiguous interface relative to the user's thumb, index finger and middle finger to facilitate controlled rolling between the user's fingers, and wherein said second and third indentations each have a maximum depth positioned in a respective lower half of the lateral sides.
  • 18. The handle according to claim 17, wherein, on opposing sides of a horizontal cross-section plane extending through the lateral second and third sides and along a longitudinal central axis of extension of said body, there is defined a non-symmetrical relationship in the oval cross-section positioned at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation.
  • 19. A handle comprising a longitudinally extended body provided on its outer surface with four, substantially concave indentations that include a first concave indentation being provided along a top surface of said body, which first concave indentation extends and merges into an elevated ridge surface support, second and third indentations being provided along lateral surfaces, and a fourth indentation being provided along the bottom surface of said body, and wherein, on opposing sides of a horizontal cross-section plane extending through the lateral second and third surfaces and along a longitudinal central axis of extension of said body, there is defined a non-symmetrical relationship in the oval cross-section positioned at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation; and wherein said body comprises in sequence along the longitudinal axis of extension, a plurality of oval cross-sections of varying width and shape, and wherein said indentations are positioned relative to each other to provide a contiguous interface relative to the user's thumb, index finger and middle finger to facilitate controlled rolling between the user's fingers, andwherein, relative to the oval cross-section positioned at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation, the bottom side of the oval cross-section converges inward more than the top side.
  • 20. The handle according to claim 19, wherein the second and third indentations are positioned predominately in the bottom side of the oval cross section positioned at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation and converge with the bottom indentation such that there is provided a common, extended middle finger reception region comprising a portion of one of said second and third indentations and a portion of the fourth indentation and a thumb reception region comprising the other of said second and third indentations and another portion of the fourth indentation.
  • 21. The handle according to claim 19, wherein lateral side portions defining the second and third indentations, in the oval cross-section positioned at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation, converge downwardly toward one another to merge with the bottom indentation and to also, together, define a continuous bottom curve within the oval cross-section at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation.
  • 22. The handle according to claim 21, wherein the interface between an upper end of one of the second and third indentations and the top indentation is contiguous across a lateral side, longitudinally extending ridge region representing a maximum outer surface of the lateral side.
  • 23. The handle according to claim 17, wherein lateral side portions defining the second and third indentations, in the oval cross-section positioned at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation, converge downwardly toward one another to merge with the bottom indentation and to also, together, define a continuous bottom curve within the oval cross-section at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation.
  • 24. The handle according to claim 23, wherein the interface between an upper end of one of the second and third indentations and the top indentation is contiguous across a lateral side, longitudinally extending ridge region representing a maximum outer surface of the lateral side.
  • 25. An instrument comprising the handle of claim 19 and a tool device extending out away from a proximal end of said handle.
  • 26. The instrument of claim 25, wherein the tool device includes a detachable tool member supported by said handle.
  • 27. The instrument of claim 26, wherein said detachable tool member is a blade.
  • 28. The instrument of claim 27, wherein the blade is a scalpel blade.
  • 29. An instrument comprising the handle of claim 1, wherein said tool device includes a shank, and a tool member supported by said shank.
  • 30. The instrument of claim 25, wherein the instrument is a precision instrument selected from the group consisting of a ball point pen, a felt-tipped pen, a fountain pen, a pencil, a mechanical pencil, a rapidiograph, a computer stylus; a scoring instrument, an engraving tool, and a soldering device.
  • 31. The instrument of claim 25, wherein the instrument is a precision instrument selected from the group consisting of a surgical tool, a dental tool, an electro-surgical tool and a microsurgery tool.
  • 32. The instrument of claim 25, wherein only the proximal end of the handle has a tool device extending from the handle.
  • 33. The handle according to claim 19, wherein the oval cross-section, positioned at the maximum depth of the first concave indentation, is positioned closer to a proximal end to the body than a distal end of the body.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
192 739 Jul 2008 IL national
US Referenced Citations (96)
Number Name Date Kind
D101325 Brown Mar 1870 S
796980 Andrews Aug 1905 A
2173451 Lorber Sep 1939 A
D134205 Hasselquist Oct 1942 S
2782764 Lehman, Jr. Feb 1957 A
3247594 Nosonowitz Apr 1966 A
D223307 Nockolds Apr 1972 S
4149811 Coffman Apr 1979 A
4167347 Hoyle Sep 1979 A
D253219 Meyer Oct 1979 S
D258310 LaHaye Feb 1981 S
D269357 Jagger Jun 1983 S
4526547 Rusk Jul 1985 A
D292104 Keller, Jr. Sep 1987 S
D298439 Rusk Nov 1988 S
4832604 Rusk May 1989 A
D307444 Poisson et al. Apr 1990 S
D307601 Poisson et al. May 1990 S
D313624 Ferjan Jan 1991 S
D318295 Sze Jul 1991 S
5056945 Klodt Oct 1991 A
5143463 Pozil et al. Sep 1992 A
D330079 Dalling et al. Oct 1992 S
5176649 Wakabayashi Jan 1993 A
5217001 Nakao et al. Jun 1993 A
5228851 Burton Jul 1993 A
5237984 Williams et al. Aug 1993 A
D359758 Inami Jun 1995 S
D361345 Chen Aug 1995 S
5440784 Hull et al. Aug 1995 A
5470162 Rubin Nov 1995 A
D372047 Adatte et al. Jul 1996 S
5531754 Shackelford, Sr. et al. Jul 1996 A
D373143 Jagger Aug 1996 S
5578050 Webb Nov 1996 A
5626430 Bistrack May 1997 A
5785443 Rubin Jul 1998 A
5975909 Ritchie Nov 1999 A
5988909 Luke, Jr. et al. Nov 1999 A
6146038 Mittersinker et al. Nov 2000 A
D440605 Izushima Apr 2001 S
6296409 Cherry Oct 2001 B1
6315476 Nakagawa Nov 2001 B2
6343885 Heyne Feb 2002 B1
D457630 Lehtonen May 2002 S
6390818 Ferranti May 2002 B2
6408524 Lai Jun 2002 B1
6502314 McCatty Jan 2003 B1
6554515 Debbas Apr 2003 B2
D480423 Kung Oct 2003 S
6752555 Geddes et al. Jun 2004 B2
D499141 Chevalier Nov 2004 S
D504700 Chuang May 2005 S
D512458 Shiina Dec 2005 S
D515389 Hsu Feb 2006 S
7101382 George et al. Sep 2006 B2
D533944 Sullivan et al. Dec 2006 S
7150754 Ziemer Dec 2006 B2
7153317 Kanodia et al. Dec 2006 B2
D535749 Yaniv et al. Jan 2007 S
7240390 Pfenniger et al. Jul 2007 B2
D560803 Tasse et al. Jan 2008 S
D561828 Wesselmann Feb 2008 S
D565106 Silverstein Mar 2008 S
7357773 Watschke Apr 2008 B2
D568475 Sandel et al. May 2008 S
D589619 Wu Mar 2009 S
D590062 Wu Apr 2009 S
7647704 Peterson Jan 2010 B2
D620107 Bartlett et al. Jul 2010 S
D632391 Gitman Feb 2011 S
D633142 Chaffee et al. Feb 2011 S
D635260 Gitman Mar 2011 S
D642214 Gitman Jul 2011 S
D651648 Luettgens Jan 2012 S
D660421 Miller et al. May 2012 S
8434954 Gitman et al. May 2013 B2
D687950 Gitman Aug 2013 S
20020124353 Holland-Letz Sep 2002 A1
20020170145 Stvartak et al. Nov 2002 A1
20040133217 Watschke Jul 2004 A1
20040204629 Knapp Oct 2004 A1
20050150083 Roberts Jul 2005 A1
20050155185 Shmueli et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060026800 Lawless Feb 2006 A1
20060041266 Sullivan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060075606 Lawless Apr 2006 A1
20060252989 Bar-Or et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060263142 Goldberg Nov 2006 A1
20070156160 Petersen Jul 2007 A1
20080051813 Dunn Feb 2008 A1
20080163463 Hulden Jul 2008 A1
20090187069 Terliuc et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100095487 Gitman Apr 2010 A1
20110087070 Tilson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20120010468 Afridi Jan 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
710575 May 1996 EP
2010004541 Jan 2010 WO
2013175463 Nov 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Office Application mailed Feb. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/620,927, filed Nov. 18, 2009.
Office Action issued by the USPTO on Sep. 13, 2013 in continuation U.S. Appl. No. 12/620,927.
Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2012 in continuation-in-part application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/620,927.
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2012 in continuation-in-part application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,729.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100005630 A1 Jan 2010 US