This invention relates to an ergonomic motion chair with an assembly that allows a user to easily optimize and adjust their sitting position. In particular, the chair includes structures that allow the seat to be easily positioned and adjusted side-to-side from a neutral position along a defined pivot axis above a seat plane, and it may, if desired, also provide forward-and-back movement of the seat about a second pivot located above the seat plane.
Stationary sitting for long periods of time can be dangerous to one's health. Studies have shown that it can shorten one's lifespan due to health risks such as heart disease, obesity, diabetes, depression, and an array of orthopedic injuries and muscle degeneration. Moreover, bio-mechanical injuries and muscular-skeletal challenges can result from the restriction of movement, prolonged joint compression and poor blood circulation of long-term sitting.
The human body can move at a multitude of joints in wide degrees of angles in all axes. Allowing the body to move along its range of motion while seated can reduce or mitigate the harmful effects of long-term sitting.
To date, designers have made many attempts to provide ergonomic improvements to chairs aimed at allowing increased user movement while sitting. For example, chair designers have attempted to tilt and toggle the seat of a chair by either having the user sit on a large movable ball or have them perched on a seat connected to a base by a ball joint or resilient structure. Examples of these latter designs can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,866,340 to Robertshaw, U.S. Pat. No. 8,919,881 to Bay, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,211,013 to Harrison at al. These types of chairs allow the seat to tilt and toggle in all directions usually about a toggle point, thereby requiring the user to take affirmative action such as using one's legs and stomach muscles to balance and hold the seat in a desired position while seated. This action provides a form of exercise while seated, but it usually comes at the expense of providing no or limited back support. Moreover, teetering on a ball, ball joint, universal hinge, or the like while seated can become tedious, uncomfortable and increase fatigue for a user during long-term sitting.
Some designers have attempted to improve the ergonomics of a chair by allowing the seat to slide within the frame relative to a seatback. An example of these types of designs can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 8,662,586 to Serber. These designs include structures that allow the seat to move, usually forward and backward, independently of a separate seatback to allow a user to tilt forward or recline in the chair. These types of chairs usually include an adjustment structure that allows the seatback to be preset to an optimal position when the user is seated normally in the chair, however, the sliding movement of the seat relative to the preset position of the seatback typically changes the user's position relative to the seatback, thereby compromising the comfort, chair fit and health benefits of the chair while the user is tilted forward or reclined in the chair.
More recently, inventors have attempted to improve seat comfort while still allowing for some body movement by requiring the user to sit in a bucket that rotates front-to back about a fixed pivot point in a seat frame. Examples of this type of design can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 3,711,152 to Sirpak et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 10,314,400 to Colonello et al. The pivoting movement of the bucket front-to-back requires the user to use their legs and arms to hold a seated position, thereby reducing slouching and the like. Like sitting on a ball, these types of designs require affirmative action on the part of the user to hold a desired position, thereby providing a form of exercise for the user. However, these types of designs limit movement to allowing only forward-and-back tilting while cradling the user in the bucket in all other directions. This restriction of allowable movement of the bucket adversely limits the range of movement of the user while seated, thereby compromising and limiting chair fit, user comfort, and the health benefits of the chair.
In addition, inventors have provided structures that allow a seat to “teeter” or “wobble” side-to-side or front to back while a user is seated. An example of this type of structure can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 10,010,758 to Osler et al. It rests the seat on a “half-pipe” or “hemispheric- or dome-shaped rocking mechanism” upon which the user is required to balance the seat. Maintaining balance on the seat requires affirmative action on the part of the user, thereby providing some exercise for the user. However, the total range of movement of the user's body that this structure provides is limited. Moreover, as with sitting on a ball or teetering structure, maintaining a seated position on this seat can increase fatigue and become unsteady, tedious and uncomfortable for the user over time.
Thus, despite the known structures for improving the ergonomics of a chair and its fit, there remains a need for an ergonomic motion chair that provides a wide range of dynamic movement, about more axes, more relative to the human body anatomy, for the user while seated in it, but does not require constant or excessive action on the part of the user to maintain a desired position. The present invention fulfills this and other needs as set forth herein.
In one disclosed embodiment, the chair has a structure that allows the seat to be easily positioned and adjusted side-to-side from a neutral position along a defined pivot axis that is positioned above a seat plane. This side-to-side swinging movement of the seat below the defined pivot axis allows a user to dynamically select, adjust and hold a desired side-to-side seat position. Moreover, gravity can urge the seat to balance to a central side-to-side neutral position and a biasing structure may also be provided to further urge the seat to return to this side-to-side neutral position. In addition, by the weight of the user combined with this geometry helps naturally urge the seat to return to the neutral position and requires the user to exert significantly less effort to return to a side-to-side neutral position unlike any other chair constructions.
In addition and concurrently thereto, the structure may include a second pivot that is also positioned above the seat plane and that provides forward-and-back movement of the seat. The seat and seat back may be joined together to a central spine that moves about the second pivot, thereby maintaining the seat back position and seat position relative to each other during forward-and-back movement of the spine along the second pivot. A second biasing structure operably secured to the spine can hold and maintain the forward-and-back position of the seat in a desired forward-and-back neutral position.
If desired, the location of this forward-and-back neutral position may be statically adjusted as desired by a user, and the second biasing structure can hold this forward-and-back neutral position at a desired tension level thereby allowing a user to select the amount of force required to move the seat out of this defined forward-and-back neutral position. Moreover, an adjustment structure may be provided that allows for static adjustment of the seatback's position on the spine, which once selected by a user will hold that position relative to the seat as the spine moves about the second pivot.
By allowing the seat plane to rotate, swing and adjust side-to-side with the forward-and-back simultaneously, and synchronic together, about the first and second pivot axes, a user's body can move to many more, infinite positions during the seating period than by any other chair construction. The chair mechanism of the current invention will unlock the hip swing, relative to a human body, about an axis whereby said first axis is critically located above the seat plane structure, and located in approximate and adjacent area of the center of the pelvis, whereby the user can rotate, or swing the pelvis side-to-side with full control and not having the sensation of “tipping off” and/or “teetering” and/or “balancing” the seat plane as found in all other designs where the axis of rotation is located below the user's body.
The advantages and features of novelty characterizing aspects of the invention are pointed out with particularity in the appended claims. To gain an improved understanding of the advantages and features of novelty, however, reference may be made to the following descriptive matter and accompanying figures that describe and illustrate various configurations and concepts related to the invention.
The foregoing Summary and the following Detailed Description will be better understood when read in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
An ergonomic motion chair 100 that provides a wide range of dynamic movement for the user while seated in it, but does not require constant or excessive action on the part of the user to maintain a desired position is shown in
As best shown in
General Construction
Referring to
Side-to-Side Swinging Structure
The seat 5 is moveable relative to the spine frame 13 and seat back 1 and may be padded and/or contoured as desired to comfortably fit a user. The seat 5 may have a left side and a right side that defines a left-to-right center 22 (
In one embodiment, the seat 5 is operably secured to a seat plate 4 that is pivotably secured to the spine frame 13 as best shown in
Alternatively and as best shown in
It can be appreciated that this structure allows the seat 5 to pivot or swing about side-to-side pivot axis 7 in the direction of arrow 24 (
Referring to
Forward-and-Back Gliding Motion Structure
As best shown in
As best shown in
Referring to
It can be appreciated that this configuration increases the tension when the seat is moved throughout the range of motion both forward or backward from the neutral position as shown in
If desired, the seat back 1 may be pivotably secured to the spine frame as shown in
Fit, Use & Operation
Having fully described mechanical aspects of a preferred embodiment of the invention, the improved fit and function of the ergonomic motion chair 100 become apparent. For example, a user resting on the seat may swing side-to-side about a pivot axes located above the seat plane while still offered the ability to move around on the seat, rather than being constrained within a bucket that only pivots forward-and-back.
Moreover, consistent and predictable back support may be provided by an adjustable-position seat back that, once adjusted into a proper fit and position, may move forward-and-back with the seat to maintain the same position relative to the seat throughout this forward-and-back range of motion of the seat. This consistent position of the seat relative to the seat back throughout the forward-and-back range of motion of the ergonomic motion chair, allows the user to maintain optimal fit, comfort and back support throughout the entire range of motion of the ergonomic motion chair 100.
In addition, suspending the seat below a front-to-back pivot axis and a side-to-side pivot axes allows the position of the seat to be infinitely adjustable in any desired position while not forcing a user to balance on the seat to hold a desired neutral position. Rather, gravity, the user's weight and the biasing structures urge the seat into its neutral position. In contrast, seats and buckets resting on balls, universal joints, or other structures that position the pivot axes below the seat require constant action on the part of the user to balance the seat into a desired position.
Referring to
The advanced improvements with this design can be more fully understood in
It can be fully appreciated and understood that with the combined pivots and synchronous swinging motions of the first and second axes of movement in tandem together, an infinite number of angles about two axes simultaneously can be achieved that are more fully linked to the natural, intuitive human body movements, in a wide degree of angles, with minimal effort of the user.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3567280 | Bradshaw | Mar 1971 | A |
3711152 | Sirpak et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
4575151 | Edstrom | Mar 1986 | A |
5261723 | Hosoe | Nov 1993 | A |
5522106 | Harrison et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
6283551 | Bergin | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6609755 | Koepke et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6866340 | Robertshaw | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7100983 | Gant | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7234768 | Manning | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7789463 | Gang | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8029060 | Parker | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8087724 | Kosik et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8534758 | Rivera | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8662586 | Serber | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8919881 | Bay | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8926017 | Grove et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8944507 | Goetz | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9211013 | Harrison et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9498066 | Christianson et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9717340 | Rivera | Aug 2017 | B2 |
D815218 | Osler | Apr 2018 | S |
10010758 | Osler et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10226127 | Harrison et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10314400 | Colonello et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10383445 | Serber | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10820704 | Sugano | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10842276 | Sugano | Nov 2020 | B2 |
20030164638 | Funk et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20080290712 | Parker | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20160081478 | Ehrenleitner | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160081483 | Harrison et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160367027 | Voigt et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180272191 | Osler et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190045928 | Yajima | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190254430 | Colonello et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190281985 | Kinoshita | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190281986 | Sugano | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290006 | Kinoshita | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190298070 | Lawson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190343286 | Sugano | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200085195 | Shibamoto | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2816224 | May 2012 | CA |
202009004382 | Aug 2009 | DE |
1163865 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1698254 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1911374 | Aug 2010 | EP |
101492896 | Feb 2015 | KR |
2437605 | Jun 2008 | RU |
WO1996014041 | May 1996 | WO |
WO2020010468 | Jan 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Internet Web Page: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7suPTql6EqA&ab_channel=QOR360 Posted: Apr. 25, 2019. |
Internet Web Page: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cymh6eUViF4&ab_channel=VermontPBS Posted: Nov. 17, 2016. |