Embodiments of the invention relate to the field of ESD (electrostatic discharge) protection circuits to protect external pins of integrated circuits.
A sudden and momentary current flow of an electrostatic discharge is a common reason for failure of integrated semiconductor circuits. In order to protect integrated circuits from damage or degradation some circuit nodes, especially those connected to external pins of the device package, are protected by an ESD protection circuit that clamps the voltage to a certain maximum value and provides a low resistance current path to sink the charge of an ESD event.
In CMOS devices ESD protection circuits are often implemented as gcNMOS (“gate coupled NMOS”) structures. A gcNMOS component comprises an n-channel MOS transistor having a drain coupled to the circuit node to be protected, a source coupled to ground potential and a gate coupled to the circuit node to be protected via a simple passive high pass. The high pass has to be designed such that, in case of an ESD event, the gate is sufficiently charged via the high pass to turn on the gcNMOS transistor and to sink the current of the electrostatic discharge.
ESD protection circuits comprising gcNMOS structures operate well if the voltage slopes of signals in the protected circuit are significantly smaller than the voltage slope occurring during an ESD event. However, in modern integrated circuits, for example, switching converters, voltage slopes during start-up and during normal operation are approximately as high as during ESD events. Thus, a gcNMOS ESD protection circuit would be also activated during normal operation and sinking current from the circuit node to be protected.
There is a need for improved ESD protection that is appropriate for modern, fast switching integrated circuits.
One example of the invention relates to a circuit arrangement comprising an ESD protection circuit for protecting a circuit node of the circuit arrangement against electrostatic discharge. The circuit arrangement comprises: a control circuit configured to deactivate the ESD protection circuit in response to a state signal representing a state of operation of the circuit arrangement.
Another example of the invention relates to a circuit arrangement comprising an ESD protection circuit for protecting a circuit node of the circuit arrangement against electrostatic discharge. The ESD protection circuit comprises: a field effect transistor with a first load terminal, a second load terminal, and a gate terminal, where the first load terminal is connected to the circuit node and the second load terminal receives a reference potential; a capacitive element being connected between the first load terminal and the gate terminal; a resistive element being connected between the second load terminal and the gate terminal; a semiconductor switch being connected between the second load terminal and the gate terminal; and a control unit for controlling the semiconductor switch receiving a state signal and being configured to close the semiconductor switch delay time after a state signal has been received, where the state signal indicates normal operation of the circuit arrangement.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, instead emphasis being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts. In the drawings:
When designing the gcNMOS ESD protection circuit 110 of
wherein VP(s) is the Laplace transform of the voltage VP of circuit node P and thus of the drain voltage of MOS transistor MP. Assuming the voltage VP ramps up over time t with a voltage slope α, that is
V
P
=α·t, (2)
or, respectively,
The Laplace transform VG(s) of the gate voltage VG yields:
Transforming equation (4) back into the time domain results in:
V
G(t)=αRGCG(1−e−t/(R
In modern, fast switching circuits like, for example, buck converters (see
The short time constant RG CG=160 ps of the high pass is necessary to keep the MOSFET MP off during normal switching operation of the protected circuit node. However a typical ESD pulse may be as long as about 160 ns (nanoseconds). Consequently, with the above dimensioning the MOSFET would never switch on and sink current. In order to switch on in response to an ESD pulse the resistor RG would have to be chosen as RG=80 kΩ yielding a time constant RG CG=160 ns that is approximately equal to the duration of an ESD pulse. However, with such a time constant the ESD protection circuit would permanently sink current even during normal switching operation.
As a result of the above considerations it can be concluded that common gcNMOS ESD protection circuits can not be used to protect circuit nodes P whose potential VP has rise times during normal switching operation similar to the rise time of a standard ESD pulse. As one example of the invention
The basic structure of a buck converter is illustrated in
According to the present example the terminal P, i.e., the circuit node to be protected against electrostatic discharge, is coupled to ground potential GND via the ESD protection circuit 110 which, in case of an ESD event, sinks the current generated by the electrostatic discharge. The driver circuit 10 further comprises a control circuit 120 for the ESD protection circuit 110. The control circuit 120 is configured to deactivate the ESD protection circuit 110 in response to a state signal SSTATE representing a state of operation of the circuit arrangement 10. This state of operation may be, for example, “power down” and “normal operation”.
The ESD protection circuit 110 may be active during the power down mode of operation of the driver circuit and deactivated when the driver resumes normal operation. In another example the control circuit 120 may be configured to provide a delayed version of the state signal SSTATE to the ESD protection circuit 110. The ESD protection circuit 110 is then activated or deactivated dependent on the delayed state signal. The delay has to be at least as long as the pulse width of an ESD event. The delay may range from about 160 to about 500 nanoseconds, for example, about 320 to about 500 nanoseconds, in order to protect the circuit node 10 against an ESD event during the first 160 nanoseconds of operation, that is, during the start-up phase of the driver circuit 10. During the normal operation, after the start-up phase, the ESD protection circuit is deactivated since the power supply, that is the bootstrap capacitor CBT in the present example, provides a low resistance current path (at least for AC signals) to ground potential.
The state signal SSTATE, i.e., the information whether the driver circuit 10 is in power down mode of operation or in normal mode of operation, may be obtained, for example, from an undervoltage lockout circuit 130 (UVLO). This signal is then delayed in the control circuit 120 as explained above. Alternatively, a chip enable signal (not shown) received from an external circuit may also be used as state signal SSTATE or the state signal SSTATE may be derived therefrom. However any other signal providing the desired information about the mode of operation of the driver circuit 10 may be used as a state signal SSTATE or may be used to derive the state signal SSTATE. A logical combination of several signals may also be adequate to derive the state signal SSTATE.
Accordingly, the control unit 120 receiving the above-explained state signal SSTATE and controls the switching state of the semiconductor switch M2. The control unit 120 is configured to close the semiconductor switch M2 a delay time after a state signal SSTATE has been received. The state signal SSTATE thereby indicates normal operation of the circuit arrangement 10. As in the previous example of
Although various examples to realize the invention have been disclosed, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made which will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It will be obvious to those reasonably skilled in the art that other components performing the same functions may be suitably substituted. Such modifications to the inventive concept are intended to be covered by the appended claims.