This application is based on and hereby claims priority to German Application No. 10 2004 019 987.6 filed on Apr. 23, 2004, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method and device for establishing a transcoder-free operation connection (TrFO) between two communication terminals (MS) in a communication network.
2. Description of the Related Art
In order to use transcoder-free operations (TrFO), a common codec type or in the case of a multi-rate codec type a common set or common configuration of codec modes has to be negotiated between the network units (UEs, RNCs, MSCs) involved. To this end, a switching unit (MSC) has access to a storage unit containing information about the radio network controller (RNC). The storage unit for example contains an input specifying the codec modes supported by the access network (UTRAN) or the radio network controller (RNC). This storage unit is downloaded by the operator for each O&M (operation and maintenance) device and contains a list of the codec modes.
However the access network UTRAN with radio network controllers RNC only supports quite specific combinations of codec modes. It would be too complex to support all codec modes in all combinations and would take up a large number of resources. The information required to negotiate the codec mode to be used for the transcoder-free operation is exchanged between the communication terminals (MSs) and switching units (MSCs) at the Iu interface by NAS signaling or at the Nc interface by BICC signaling.
According to the content of the storage unit, a radio network controller RNC 1 for example supports the codec modes a, b, c, d, f in the combinations (codec mode configuration) a/b and b/c/d/f. The supported codec mode configurations have to be taken into account when negotiating the codec modes. Currently only individual codec modes are negotiated, not codec mode configurations, which each includes a number of codec modes. This means that it is sometimes not possible to establish a TrFO connection, as with the plurality of possible codec mode configurations (15 codec mode configurations are currently defined), it is very probable that the two radio network controllers RNCs involved in negotiating a TrFO connection support an overlapping number of identical modes but only in different codec mode configurations. If the radio network controller RNC2 supports the code mode configurations “a/b/c” and “f/g/h” for example, it is currently not possible to establish a transcoder-free operation connection between the radio network controller RNC1, which supports a/b and b/c/d/f, and the radio network controller RNC2.
An aspect of the present invention is therefore to provide a simple and effective way of increasing the probability that a transcoder-free operation connection can be established between two communication terminals.
In the event of a request from a switching unit relating to the use of at least one subset of a codec mode configuration for the establishment of a transcoder-free operation connection, a radio network controller, which supports all the subsets of a supported codec mode configuration, checks whether the at least one requested subset is supported. Such a subset includes at least one, preferably at least two codec modes of a codec mode configuration but fewer than all the codec modes of the codec mode configuration. A transcoder-free operation connection is then established, if the result of the check is that at least this one subset is supported. To ensure compatibility with the Iu interface, the radio network controller signals to the communication terminal using a suitable message that data should only be sent in the uplink direction (from the communication terminal to the radio network controller) with the at least one supported subset of a codec mode configuration, as requested by the switching unit. One advantage of the invention is that the probability of a transcoder-free operation connection being set up between two communication terminals can be increased significantly in a simple and effective manner.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of an exemplary embodiment illustrated in a figure, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to preferred embodiments thereof and examples, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention covered by the claims which may include the phrase “at least one of A, B and C” as an alternative expression that means one or more of A, B and C may be used, contrary to the holding in Superguide v. DIRECTV, 69 USPQ2d 1865 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 019 987 | Apr 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/051687 | 4/18/2005 | WO | 00 | 5/15/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/104583 | 11/3/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7577152 | Bachmann et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020077065 | Tamura et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030195981 | Graf et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210659 | Chu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040100914 | Hellwig et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20070171841 | Witzel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 11 179 | Nov 2000 | DE |
101 63 478 | Jul 2003 | DE |
03092312 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03103313 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004028093 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070135165 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |