The present disclosure relates to thermionic vacuum tubes, and, in particular, to estimating total cathode space current in thermionic vacuum tubes.
Total space current in thermionic vacuum tubes has been modeled based on the Child-Langmuir three-halves-power law:
It has been seen; however, in published plate characteristic curves of real tubes that the perveance and amplification factor attributes in Equation (1) are not constant but may vary according to tube operating area i.e. they vary with electrode voltages e1, e2, . . . , eb.
For triode tubes, newer work makes improvements to handle such variabilities by using common mathematical approximation methods to fit polynomials to the tube properties appearing in Equation (1). Such work addresses the dependence on multiple electrode voltages by using multivariate polynomials. This may become increasingly complex with each additional electrode and the example of such work makes simplifying assumptions as to which electrode voltage is the most important so as to use univariate polynomials. The difficulty is that such assumptions are typically tested for every tube to be modelled and especially if this approach is found to be useful for tetrode or pentode tubes in the future.
Moreover, existing models are limited in determining the distribution of total cathode space current between grid current(s) and the plate current. For example, some models are inapplicable for plate current to grid current ratios of less than one.
In some embodiments of the inventive concept, a method comprises, performing by a processor, estimating a total cathode space current for a thermionic vacuum tube having at least one grid and a plate, such that at least one amplification factor associated with the at least one grid is determined by a polynomial based on a variable that represents at plurality of voltages associated with the at least one grid and the plate, the variable being heuristically determined.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the polynomial is a univariate polynomial.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the at least one grid comprises a plurality of grids having a plurality of amplification factors associated therewith and wherein the variable x(e1, e2, . . . , eb) is given as:
wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects and contact potential on a first one of the plurality of grids e1; wherein e2, . . . , en are the voltages associated with second through nth ones of the plurality of grids, respectively; wherein μ2, . . . , μn are the plurality of amplification factors of the first one of the plurality of grids associated with the second through nth ones of the plurality of grids; wherein eb is the plate voltage; and wherein μ is an amplification factor associated with a first one of the plurality of grids with respect to the plate.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the plurality of amplification factors μk are given by
wherein αk,i are fitting constants based on characteristics of the thermionic vacuum tube and k refers to an electrode; and wherein a respective amplification factor μk′ is represented by the constant αk,0 when the associated grid carries a positive current thereon.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the at least one grid comprises a plurality of grids, the method further comprising determining a plurality of currents associated with the plurality of grids, respectively, based on a plurality of current ratios of the plurality of currents associated with the plurality of grids to a plate current.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the plurality of ratios is based on a plate voltage and the plurality of voltages associated with the plurality of grids, respectively.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the plurality of ratios Dj are given by
wherein S(w)=e−w, w>0; ε wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects and contact potential on a first one of the plurality of grids e1; wherein ef=a control grid voltage e1+ε of the first one of the plurality of grids or a screen grid voltage e2 of a second one of the plurality of grids; wherein δj=current division factor, measured by a ratio of plate current to respective current associated with a respective one of the plurality of grids for equal plate and positive grid voltages; wherein rj=grid dependent inverse power law; and wherein eb is the plate voltage.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a triode and rj=½.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a tetrode or a pentode in the tetrode configuration and rj=⅕.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a triode with one grid and the plate current Ib is given by
wherein Isp is a total space current associated with the thermionic vacuum tube; wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects; wherein eb is the plate voltage; wherein e1 is the grid voltage; wherein D1 is a current ratio a grid to a plate current; and wherein μ is an amplification factor associated with the first one of the plurality of grids with respect to the plate
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a tetrode or pentode and the plate current Ib is given by
wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects and contact potential on a first one of the plurality of grids e1; wherein μ2 is the amplification factor of the first grid associated with the second one of the plurality of grids; and wherein μ is an amplification factor associated with the first one of the plurality of grids with respect to the plate.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a circuit element in a plurality of interconnected circuit elements, the method further comprising: using the estimate of the total cathode space current to determine an operational effect on at least one other one of the plurality of interconnected circuit elements.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the method further comprises receiving a digitized audio signal; and modifying the digitized audio signal based on the estimate of the total cathode space current.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the method further comprises converting the digitized audio signal that was modified to an analog signal.
In some embodiments of the inventive concept, a system comprises a processor and a memory coupled to the processor and comprising computer readable program code embodied in the memory that is executable by the processor to perform operations comprising: estimating a total cathode space current for a thermionic vacuum tube having at least one grid and a plate, such that at least one amplification factor associated with the at least one grid is determined by a polynomial based on a variable that represents at plurality of voltages associated with the at least one grid and the plate, the variable being heuristically determined.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the polynomial is a univariate polynomial.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the at least one grid comprises a plurality of grids having a plurality of amplification factors associated therewith and wherein the variable x(e1, e2, . . . , eb) is given as:
wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects and contact potential on a first one of the plurality of grids e1; wherein e2, . . . , μn are the voltages associated with second through nth ones of the plurality of grids, respectively; wherein μ2, . . . , μn are the plurality of amplification factors of the first one of the plurality of grids associated with the second through nth ones of the plurality of grids; wherein eb is the plate voltage; and wherein μ is an amplification factor associated with a first one of the plurality of grids with respect to the plate.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the plurality of amplification factors μk are given by
wherein αk,i are fitting constants based on characteristics of the thermionic vacuum tube and k refers to an electrode; and wherein a respective amplification factor μk′ is represented by the constant αk,0 when the associated grid carries a positive current thereon.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the at least one grid comprises a plurality of grids, the operations further comprising determining a plurality of currents associated with the plurality of grids, respectively, based on a plurality of current ratios of the plurality of currents associated with the plurality of grids to a plate current.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the plurality of ratios is based on a plate voltage and the plurality of voltages associated with the plurality of grids, respectively.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the plurality of ratios Dj are given by
wherein S(w)=e−w, w>0; wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects and contact potential on a first one of the plurality of grids e1; wherein ej=a control grid voltage e1+ε of the first one of the plurality of grids or a screen grid voltage e2 of a second one of the plurality of grids; wherein δj=current division factor, measured by a ratio of plate current to respective current associated with a respective one of the plurality of grids for equal plate and positive grid voltages; wherein rj=grid dependent inverse power law; and wherein eb is the plate voltage.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a triode and rj=½.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a tetrode or a pentode in the tetrode configuration and rj=⅕.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a triode with one grid and the plate current Ib is given by
wherein Isp is a total space current associated with the thermionic vacuum tube; wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects; wherein eb is the plate voltage; wherein e1 is the grid voltage; wherein D1 is a current ratio a grid to a plate current; and wherein μ is an amplification factor associated with the first one of the plurality of grids with respect to the plate
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a tetrode or pentode and the plate current Ib is given by
wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects and contact potential on a first one of the plurality of grids e1; wherein μ2 is the amplification factor of the first grid associated with the second one of the plurality of grids; and wherein μ is an amplification factor associated with the first one of the plurality of grids with respect to the plate.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a circuit element in a plurality of interconnected circuit elements, the operations further comprising: using the estimate of the total cathode space current to determine an operational effect on at least one other one of the plurality of interconnected circuit elements.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the operations further comprise receiving a digitized audio signal; and modifying the digitized audio signal based on the estimate of the total cathode space current.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the operations further comprise converting the digitized audio signal that was modified to an analog signal.
In some embodiments of the inventive concept, a computer program product comprises a tangible computer readable storage medium comprising computer readable program code embodied in the medium that when executed by a processor causes the processor to perform operations comprising: estimating a total cathode space current for a thermionic vacuum tube having at least one grid and a plate, such that at least one amplification factor associated with the at least one grid is determined by a polynomial based on a variable that represents at plurality of voltages associated with the at least one grid and the plate, the variable being heuristically determined.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the polynomial is a univariate polynomial.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the at least one grid comprises a plurality of grids having a plurality of amplification factors associated therewith and wherein the variable x(e1, e2, . . . , eb) is given as:
wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects and contact potential on a first one of the plurality of grids e1; wherein e2, . . . , en are the voltages associated with second through nth ones of the plurality of grids, respectively; wherein μ2, . . . , μn are the plurality of amplification factors of the first one of the plurality of grids associated with the second through nth ones of the plurality of grids; wherein eb is the plate voltage; and wherein μ is an amplification factor associated with a first one of the plurality of grids with respect to the plate.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the plurality of amplification factors μk are given by
wherein αk,i are fitting constants based on characteristics of the thermionic vacuum tube and k refers to an electrode; and wherein a respective amplification factor μk′ is represented by the constant αk,0 when the associated grid carries a positive current thereon.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the at least one grid comprises a plurality of grids, the operations further comprising determining a plurality of currents associated with the plurality of grids, respectively, based on a plurality of current ratios of the plurality of currents associated with the plurality of grids to a plate current.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the plurality of ratios is based on a plate voltage and the plurality of voltages associated with the plurality of grids, respectively.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the plurality of ratios Dj are given by
wherein s(w)=e−w, w>0; wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects and contact potential on a first one of the plurality of grids e1; wherein ef=a control grid voltage e1+ε of the first one of the plurality of grids or a screen grid voltage e2 of a second one of the plurality of grids; wherein δj=current division factor, measured by a ratio of plate current to respective current associated with a respective one of the plurality of grids for equal plate and positive grid voltages; wherein rj=grid dependent inverse power law; and wherein eb is the plate voltage.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a triode and rj=½.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a tetrode or a pentode in the tetrode configuration and rj=⅕.
In further embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a triode with one grid and the plate current Ib is given by
wherein Isp is a total space current associated with the thermionic vacuum tube; wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects; wherein eb is the plate voltage; wherein e1 is the grid voltage; wherein D1 is a current ratio a grid to a plate current; and wherein μ is an amplification factor associated with the first one of the plurality of grids with respect to the plate
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a tetrode or pentode and the plate current Ib is given by
wherein ε is a correction constant for initial velocity effects and contact potential on a first one of the plurality of grids e1; wherein μ2 is the amplification factor of the first grid associated with the second one of the plurality of grids; and wherein μ is an amplification factor associated with the first one of the plurality of grids with respect to the plate.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the thermionic vacuum tube is a circuit element in a plurality of interconnected circuit elements, the operations further comprising: using the estimate of the total cathode space current to determine an operational effect on at least one other one of the plurality of interconnected circuit elements.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the operations further comprise receiving a digitized audio signal; and modifying the digitized audio signal based on the estimate of the total cathode space current.
In other embodiments of the inventive concept, the operations further comprise converting the digitized audio signal that was modified to an analog signal.
Other methods, systems, articles of manufacture, and/or computer program products, according to embodiments of the inventive subject matter, will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon review of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, articles of manufacture, and/or computer program products be included within this description, be within the scope of the present inventive subject matter, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Other features of embodiments will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of specific embodiments thereof when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present disclosure. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known methods, procedures, components and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present disclosure. It is intended that all embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented separately or combined in any way and/or combination. Aspects described with respect to one embodiment may be incorporated in different embodiments although not specifically described relative thereto. That is, all embodiments and/or features of any embodiments can be combined in any way and/or combination.
As used herein, the term “data processing facility” includes, but it is not limited to, a hardware element, firmware component, and/or software component. A data processing system may be configured with one or more data processing facilities.
Some embodiments of the inventive subject matter may stem from a realization that estimating a total cathode space current for a thermionic vacuum tube, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, uses a polynomial fitted to an amplification factor. In some embodiments, the polynomial is a univariate polynomial, but uses a heuristic function for the polynomial variable so all grid electrode voltages may influence the value returned. This may result in increased accuracy and obviate the need for multivariate polynomial approximation.
In some embodiments, other tube properties, such as perveance and the contact potential/initial velocity corrections, may remain constants. Maintaining a constant for the value of perveance addresses the realization that it may not have large excursion.
In the determination of total space current, using polynomial approximation for only one tube property may make it easier to adjust the values of all properties to improve overall accuracy.
The terms in Equation (1) sum to produce an equivalent electrode voltage for a diode whose effective plate is positioned at the first grid. According to some embodiments of the inventive concept for the triode and tetrode models described herein, the ratio of voltage on the control grid to the sum of the equivalent diode electrode voltage contributions for electrodes beyond the control grid may be useful as the variable of polynomials used to approximate tube amplification.
With regard to the current flow through a tube's positive grid electrodes the traditional method for its determination involves the following empirical current division equations:
where:
Ib=the current flow through the plate electrode
I1=current flow through the control (i.e. 1st) grid
I2=current flow through the screen (i.e. 2nd) grid
δ=current division factor, measured by the ratio of plate to grid current for equal plate and positive grid voltages
e1=voltage at the triode control (i.e., first) grid
e2=voltage at the pentode screen (i.e, second) grid
Some embodiments of the inventive concept described herein may combine the effect of the above equations into one heuristic and extend accuracy of pentode current division for the range eb≤0.259e2. The diminished accuracy of Equation (3) in this range may be seen in published information for the 6V7 tube.
When tube operation moves between positive and negative control grid regions, plate current may experience a numerical discontinuity. This may adversely affect calculation of derivative based properties, such as voltage gain, mutual conductance and plate resistance in the transition region. According to some embodiments of the inventive concept, discontinuity may be reduced or eliminated by use of a smoothing technique.
Referring to
Although
Referring now to
As shown in
The three-halves-power law parameters module 325 may be configured to receive and process values for parameters used in the Child-Langmuir three-halves-power law model for determining the total space current in a thermionic vacuum tube. These parameters may include the perveance, a correction value for initial velocity effects and contact potential on the first grid, and the amplification factor of the first grid to the remaining grids or with respect to the anode or plate.
The parameters for model extensions module 330 may be configured to determine or generate extensions Child-Langmuir three-halves-power law model including, but not limited to, generating a polynomial based on a variable that represents a plurality of voltages associated with the anode or plate and one or more grid electrodes, fitting the polynomial to amplification factor(s) for the grid electrode(s), determining a total space current for the vacuum tube based on the amplification factor(s), determining a current division between the total cathode space current and the individual grid electrode(s), and determining the electrode current(s) based on the current division.
The triode model parameters module 335 and the tetrode/pentode model parameters module 337 may be configured to determine or generate total cathode space current and electrode currents for specific tetrode/pentode thermionic vacuum tube configurations including smoothing the discontinuity due to a step change in current that may occur on a transition between a positive and negative potential on a grid electrode. In some embodiments, the smoothing may be performed by adding a portion of the grid current back into the plate current during the transition.
The turning and limit parameters module 340 may be configured to receive and modify the determinations made by the extensions to multi-grid model parameters module 330 the triode model parameters module 335 and the tetrode/pentode model parameters module 337 to tune the determinations and/or estimations to specific thermionic vacuum tube implementations and to avoid errors that may occur when the parameter values used in the aforementioned modules are outside of expected operating ranges, for example.
The circuit application module 345 may be configured to use the estimations of total cathode space current, grid currents, and anode or plate current to simulate one or more operations of a thermionic vacuum tube, such as the thermionic vacuum tube of
The data module 350 may represent values for the various parameters used in the estimation and/or simulation of operations of a thermionic vacuum tube in accordance with the embodiments described herein.
The communication module 355 may be configured to facilitate communication between as user and/or another electronic device for supplying input data for the various parameters used in the estimation and/or simulation of operations of a thermionic vacuum tube in accordance with the embodiments described herein and in communicating the determined currents and/or other operational effects, such as in a circuit simulation or signal processing application, to a user or other device for display and/or storage.
Although
Computer program code for carrying out operations of data processing systems discussed above with respect to
Moreover, the functionality of the data processing system 200 of
The data processing apparatus of
Determining the thermionic vacuum tube parameters may be iterative as certain parameters may need to be adjusted to reflect differences between theoretical performance and actual performance.
Embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be illustrated by way of example. Further embodiments of the modules comprising the vacuum tube simulation module 320 of
The thermionic vacuum tube model, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, may be governed by processes executed by the extensions to multi-grid model parameters module 330. These processes/determinations may include, but are not limited to the following:
Methods and processes for determining these parameters, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, are described below.
Below is a function for the polynomial variable:
Note that the denominator of Equation (4) is never negative. This is because a limitation of Equation (1) and of its associated form herein is that it does not support formation of virtual cathodes beyond the control grid. This means that the sign x(e1, e2, . . . , eb) is determined by the sign of the numerator only i.e. the corrected control grid voltage.
This feature may be used to select alternative actions when the tube is operating with positive grid current and when it is not.
Some benefits for polynomials using this variable may include, but are not limited to the following:
They can be univariate but all electrodes may still influence the fitted property.
The polynomial variable may be unit-less so physical units may be determined by the units of the polynomial coefficients. This may preserve the physical integrity of the tube property the polynomial represents.
The coefficient of the 0th power term may be interpreted as the value of the fitted tube property when a tube is operating in self bias mode.
The model presented here, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, may use a polynomial fitted to the amplification factor. That is:
In subsequent equations for simplicity, the subscript k may be absent from the polynomial coefficients αk,i and/or the dependent variable μk′ when the electrode it refers to is implicitly known from context.
Note that the Min function may have the effect of invoking polynomial approximation only when there is no control grid current. Otherwise Equation (5) returns the coefficient of the 0th power term .i.e. a constant amplification factor for positive grid operation.
Even though Equation (5) is not intended to model the variation of amplification factor for positive grid operation, the actual amplification factor experienced when using it in the model does show the expected reduction in amplification factor with increasing positive grid operation (just as it does for increasingly negative grid operation). This occurs because positive grid operation may divert some space current to the control grid and away from the plate, which reduces the amplification factor in this region.
When the polynomial function which is fitted to the amplification factors and substituted into Equation (1) the expression for total space current becomes:
Where:
To generalize the current division method one may consider the equations Dj that provide the results for the following current divisions:
Where:
Ij=the current through grid electrode j when ej>0
No simple, analytical form for functions Dj(e1, e2, . . . , eb) is known. What are available are the tube type specific, empirical Equations (2) and (3).
For tubes with two grid electrodes or less the effects of these empirical equations are reproduced by following heuristic equation for Dj(ei, eb):
Where:
ej=control grid voltage e1+ε or screen grid voltage e2,
δj=current division factor, measured by the ratio of plate to grid current for equal plate and positive grid voltages.
rj=grid dependent inverse power law where r1≈½ and r2≈⅕.
The current division heuristic (8a) may be understood by noting that S(w) has values between zero and one.
Equation 8b provides a current division heuristic according to other embodiments of the inventive concept, which may provide improved accuracy, but may take more time to compute:
Its effect with triodes is seen by setting r1=½ and examining the two cases S(w)=0 and S(w)=1. Doing so gives Equation (2). The empirical constant 1.392 in Equation (2) becomes 3.360 in Equation (8a), however this value is adequate for practical purposes.
Its effect with beam tetrodes/pentodes is similarly seen by setting r2=⅕, and examining the two cases S(w)=0 and S(w)=1. Doing so gives Equation (3). In addition it gives the case shown below:
Note that Equations (2) and (3) were validated from observation of specific tube types (i.e. (2) for triodes and (3) pentodes). Heuristic Equation (8a) applies instead to a specific grid irrespective of tube type e.g. grid 1 may belong to a triode or a pentode. That is, D1(e1, eb) as computed by (8a) may be used for pentodes.
Other feature of Equations (7) and (8a) are:
Current division is defined generally for triodes and beam tetrodes/pentodes to be consistent with the generality of Equation (1).
They unify separate equations and in the process identify the case given by Equation (9) which was not addressed previously.
The sharp knee in the current division characteristic when a voltage range transition occurs, i.e., at the transition between the two empirical power laws of Equation 2, is rounded and in accordance with graphical evidence.
Current division is generalized for multi-grid situations just like the three-halves-power law for total space current.
Tube electrodes at a negative or zero potential with respect to the cathode may have no appreciable current flowing through them. Total space current may, thus, be distributed between the plate and any grid electrodes that are at a positive potential with respect to the cathode.
Where:
Isp=total space current
ej=voltage at grid electrode j
Ij=current flowing through grid electrode j
Equation (10) restated in terms of the current division Equations of (8a) gives:
Plate current is thus determined as shown below:
The current through any positive grid electrodes can then be determined by current division equations.
The thermionic vacuum tube model, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, may be governed by processes executed by the triode model parameters module 335 and beam the tetrode/pentode model parameters module 337. These processes/determinations may include, but are not limited to those described below.
For convenience of description, the modified model will be described as it applies to triodes and beam tetrodes/pentodes separately. Both tube types however use the same basic Equations (4), (5), (6), (8a) and (12).
Note that the model for pentodes described here, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, may be the same as for beam tetrodes in that only the first two pentode grids are handled by the model. The third pentode grid (i.e. the suppressor grid) may be assumed to be connected to the cathode.
From (4) the polynomial variable is:
From (5) amplification factor is:
From (6) total space current is:
From (8a) the current division expression is:
From (12) the plate current is:
A problem with (17) is that on transition between positive and negative grid operation Ib may experience a step change in value caused by the equation's inclusion or elimination of grid current. This may adversely affect the calculation of derivative based (dynamic) properties such as voltage gain, mutual conductance and plate resistance in the transition region and may cause unwanted artefacts in simulation.
An approach that may be taken to smooth this discontinuity, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, is to add a part of the grid current back into the plate current during transition. This small contribution to plate current may gradually diminish as tube operation moves farther away from the transition boundary.
When smoothing is applied to (17) the plate current is:
From (7) the grid current is:
Or by:
I1=Isp−Ib (21)
Equation (21) above uses Equation (10) as expressed for triodes. From a computation perspective it may suffer from the loss of significant figures due to subtraction of very nearly equal quantities, a situation that may occur at grid current transition.
From Equation (4) the polynomial variable is:
From Equation (5) the amplification factors are:
Note that for these tube types function μ′ may be adequately approximated by a constant e.g. the original amplification factor that would have been chosen if using (1).
From (6) total space current is:
From (8a) the current division expressions for the control grid and the screen grid are respectively:
From (12) the plate current is:
As was done for the triode when smoothing to handle the transitioning of the control grid, current flow is applied to Equation (28), such that the plate current is:
Note the current division expression D1 for the control grid of beam tetrodes/pentodes is discretionary as described previously. This is not an issue for tube operation in the negative control grid region.
From (7) the grid currents are:
The thermionic vacuum tube model, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, may be governed by processes executed by the tuning and limit parameters module 340. These processes/determinations may include, but are not limited to those described below.
The two groups of parameters for the tube model that have been described so far are:
The first two groups have been discussed in previous sections. A third group that may be used for practical application of the model may include parameters for tuning and limiting the result values of the model equations. These may be used to balance error and safeguard equations from being used outside their intended operating range. They are shown in Table I.
A 3rd order polynomial form of equation (14) was fitted to the amplification factor of the 12AX7. This polynomial and that in other work, e.g., Cardarilli et al., Improved Large-Signal Model for Vacuum Triodes, in IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2009. pp 3006-3009, or amplification factor have the same form. That is they are univariate polynomials in that they have the form of Equation (33).
The coefficients and variables of both methods are shown in Table II. Their respective fit to the 12AX7 amplification factor is shown in
Current division data was extracted for the 35T and 6V7 tubes.
The current division factor and the power law for the 35T triode and the 6V7 pentode are shown in Table III.
Power laws of ½ for triodes or ⅕ for beam tetrodes/pentodes in equation (8) are regarded as defaults. See the chart for the 35T in Spangenburg, Vacuum Tubes, 1st ed., New York; McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1948, ch 9, 11, pp. 224, 273 that exhibits power law variation, with respect to grid voltage.
Equations (16) and (27) are compared with actual tube data in
A benefit of using Equation (8a) is that the transition between the two empirical power laws of Equation (2) may occur smoothly with electrode voltages. In addition (8a) also shows increased accuracy when eb≤0.25 e2 as this case was not previously addressed. In contrast with conventional models, Equation 8 can be used for plate to grid voltage ratios less than one as shown in
The extended model was fitted to the 12AX7 and 6SN7 triodes and to the 6BQ5 pentode.
Their model parameter values are shown in Table IV. Characteristic curves were generated for each of these tubes and compared with manufacturer published data.
This artifact may be expected in all models using this common mathematical construct to grid current, but it may become obscured if the graph's step size is insufficiently granular.
Transient analysis simulations of Class A amplifier circuits were used to determine the large signal performance of the modeled tubes.
The large-signal voltage gain of the circuit in
It is evident that circuits 4-9, for the 12AX7 and the 6SN7, show larger error in the modelled voltage gain (i.e., 10%-20%). These higher error circuits may be characterized by noting they are in the low power supply voltage group (i.e., Ebb=90V) and they involve the higher value plate resistors (i.e., Rp=220 kΩ,470 kΩ). Circuits 1-3 which involve lower plate resistor values have lower error.
That is, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, model voltage gain may be less accurate for circuits whose operation is confined to both the low voltage and the low current region of the tube's plate characteristics.
Additional validation of the model with extensions, as applied to triodes, is provided by the 6SN7 which is more difficult to model accurately compared to the 12AX7 due to the following factors; that is the 6SN7 amplification factor has greater relative variation in its typical operating area and its plate characteristics cover a wide range of both negative and positive control grid voltages.
Transient analysis of the circuits shown in
These charts contain five amplifier circuits for this tube corresponding to the conditions shown below in Table VI:
The results are shown below in Table VII where for each circuit there are two rows listed, showing respectively, the published data and the corresponding values produced by the model:
In general the model's computation of plate current and output power is on average approximately 3% in error. Screen grid current has significantly higher error that is attributed in part to the de-tuning of screen grid characteristics for the purpose of optimizing the 6BQ5 plate characteristics. On the basis of this tube's recommended applications the accuracy of the plate characteristics is given priority as they directly affect power output and harmonic distortion. Model performance may be useful for circuit analysis and for real-time signal acoustic emulation and the distortion signature characteristic of pentodes (i.e., a dominant 3rd harmonic) is well reproduced. Similarly, when the 6BQ5 is operating in triode mode the distortion signature of triodes may also be obtained.
Determining the model parameters of a real tube may involve an iterative procedure. This is because the equations governing the model are approximate and, as a result, there may be error in the predicted value produced by each model equation. Iteration may be required to tune parameters so as to balance out as much as possible these individual errors and achieve a lower overall error in total space current.
Table VIII outlines the major steps of this iterative procedure according to some embodiments of the inventive concept. Such embodiments have been described above, for example, with reference to the flowchart of
The vacuum tube model extensions presented affect two main areas of interest for actual tubes. The first addresses the dependence of amplification factor on multiple tube electrode voltages. The second addresses disparities and gaps of the empirical expressions that give grid currents. To evaluate the capabilities of the model with these extensions, the following perspectives have been used:
Generality of the model extensions is demonstrated by their application to both the triode and beam tetrode/pentode.
Generality is an existing feature of the total space (i.e. cathode) current Equation (1) which applies to tubes with any number of electrodes. The improvements here may preserve this.
More difficult is achieving generality in the calculation of individual electrode currents through current division functions. No simple, analytical form for such functions is known. Empirical functions have been found that account for the grid current of triodes and the screen current of pentodes. Based on the empirical functions, embodiments presented here may provide a more general expression to calculate these two currents, but which also includes a previously not considered case for screen current, when the tube's plate voltage is low compared to its screen grid voltage. This existence of this extra case is visible in the current division chart of the 6V9.
A novel perspective is that Equation (8a) may be viewed as a heuristic applicable to every grid in a tube. The reasoning behind its use to determine control grid current in pentodes was provided and was demonstrated in the model of the 6BQ5. Nevertheless, control grid current for pentodes may be a discretionary generalization of Equation (8a) as this equation originates from empirical equations specific to tube type.
Error of the model with the extensions varies across the tube operating area, as does the relative importance of regions within that operating area.
An overview of error regions may be gained by separating the test circuits into two groups, those whose large-signal operation is substantially outside low voltage and current regions and those remaining.
The first group of circuits has errors of a few percent. The second group's error is approximately threefold on average for the 12AX7 and 6SN7. For the 6BQ5 no manufacturer published circuits that could be put into this second group were found.
The 6BQ5 however has manufacturer published harmonic distortion data that allowed additional comparisons to be made. Distortion fidelity is a desirable feature for a tube model and the error of the 6BQ5 circuits for total harmonic and dominant harmonic distortion is respectively 13% and 9% on average, and not above 20% and 13% for the worst cases.
Lower model error, according to some embodiments of the inventive concept, has been achieved by capturing the dependence of amplification factor on multiple tube electrode voltages. That is, by using Equation (4) as the variable of a univariate polynomial fitted to amplification factors.
The accurate screen current modelling at low plate voltages may be a pentode specific improvement also.
Coverage can be observed from the model generated families of characteristics curves.
All three example tube models, that is for the 12AX7, 6SN7 and 6BQ5 generate curves that are broadly in agreement with the full range of manufacturer data, albeit with reduced correspondence in narrow regions adjacent to the axes of the plate and grid characteristics.
Tube regions commonly excluded from general data manuals are not covered by the model extensions e.g. the thermionic emission saturation region.
In the above-description of various embodiments of the present disclosure, aspects of the present disclosure may be illustrated and described herein in any of a number of patentable classes or contexts including any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof. Accordingly, aspects of the present disclosure may be implemented entirely hardware, entirely software (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or combining software and hardware implementation that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit” “module,” “component,” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present disclosure may take the form of a computer program product comprising one or more computer readable media having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
Any combination of one or more computer readable media may be used. The computer readable media may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an appropriate optical fiber with a repeater, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. Program code embodied on a computer readable signal medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present disclosure may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Scala, Smalltalk, Eiffel, JADE, Emerald, C++, C#, VB.NET, Python or the like, conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language, Visual Basic, Fortran 2003, Perl, COBOL 2002, PHP, ABAP, LabVIEW, dynamic programming languages, such as Python, Ruby and Groovy, or other programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider) or in a cloud computing environment or offered as a service such as a Software as a Service (SaaS).
Aspects of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the disclosure. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable instruction execution apparatus, create a mechanism for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that when executed can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions when stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which when executed, cause a computer to implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable instruction execution apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatuses or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various aspects of the present disclosure. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The present disclosure of embodiments has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the disclosure in the form disclosed. Many variations and modifications can be made to the embodiments without substantially departing from the principles of the present invention. All such variations and modifications are intended to be included herein within the scope of the present invention.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/675,214, filed May 23, 2018, the entire content of which is incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9633812 | Senisi | Apr 2017 | B1 |
20080218259 | Gallo | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20110033057 | Gallo | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130313980 | Cheatham, III | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2493029 | Jan 2013 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for corresponding International Application No. PCT/AU2019/000058, dated Jul. 31, 2019, 9 pages. |
Radiotron Designer's Handbook, 4th ed., Amalgamated Wireless Valve Co., Sydney, Australia, 1963, pp. 70-71 and 82-84. |
Herbert J. Reich, “Grid-Controlled High-Vacuum Tubes” in Theory and Applications of Electron Tubes, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1944, ch. 3, sec. 3-1. |
E. Leon Chaffee, “Emission of Electrons” in Theory of Termionic Vacuum Tubes, 1st ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co, 1933, ch. IV, sec. 37, pp. 67-71. |
W. Marshall Leach Jr., SPICE Models for Vacuum-Tube Amplifiers, J. Audio Eng. Soc. (Abstracts) (Mar. 1995), vol. 43, pp. 117-126. |
Technical Manual-Sylvania Tubes, 10th ed., SYLVANIA, New York, 1955. |
G.C. Cardarilli Marco Re and Leonardo Di Carlo, Improved Large-Signal Model for Vacuum Triodes, in IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2009, pp. 3006-3009. |
Kristjan Dempwolf and Udo Zölzer, A Physically-Motivated Triode Model for Circuit Simulations, Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, Paris, France, (Sep. 19-23, 2011), (DAFx-257-DAFx-264). |
Karl R. Spangenburg, Vacuum Tubes, 1st ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co, 1948, ch. 9, 11, pp. 224-225 and 272-273. |
RCA Receiving Tube Manual, RCA, Harrison, NJ, 1968, pp. 545-553, 1996. |
Philips Data Handbook—Electron tubes Part 4, Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1972, (14 pages). |
Intusoft, “Modeling Vacuum Tubes”, Intusoft Newsletter, Feb. 1994, pp. 6-11). |
Intusoft, “Modeling Vacuum tTubes, Part II”, Intusoft Newsletter, Apr. 1994, pp. 7-11. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190362926 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62675214 | May 2018 | US |