Embodiments of the invention relate to systems and methods for the estimation of jurisdictional boundary crossings for fuel tax reporting.
Operators of commercial motor vehicles (“CMV's”) are required to meet certain specific performance standards and regulations for operating such vehicles. For example, some operators of the CMV's are required to meet hours-of-service regulations. Also, many states require fuel taxes be paid based upon mileage driven by CMV's within their jurisdictions.
One embodiment of the invention provides a method of estimating a jurisdictional boundary crossing for fuel tax reporting relating to a commercial motor vehicle (CMV). The method includes defining a geo-fenced region for a jurisdiction, the geo-fenced region having at least one boundary. The method also includes determining, using a positioning system and the geo-fenced region, a location of the vehicle and estimating a location of the vehicle when positioning system information is unavailable for a period of time, including determining if a distance between two consecutive positioning system points is greater than a threshold value, and using predetermined route information to estimate where the vehicle has crossed the geo-fenced region boundary. Additionally, the method includes storing vehicle location data on a base unit until the base unit is coupled to a portable device.
Another embodiment of the invention provides a system configured to determine state fuel tax reporting relating to a CMV. The system includes a base unit installed on the vehicle, a portable device, at least one processor, and at least one physical computer storage medium comprising stored executable instructions that when executed by the at least one processor cause the at least one processor to perform operations to estimating a jurisdictional boundary crossing. The operations include defining a geo-fenced region for a jurisdiction, the geo-fenced region having at least one boundary. The operations also include determining, using a positioning system and the geo-fenced region, a location of the vehicle, and estimating a location of the vehicle when positioning system information is unavailable for a period of time, including determining if a distance between two consecutive positioning system points is greater than a threshold value and using predetermined route information to estimate where the vehicle has crossed the geo-fenced region boundary. Additionally, the operations include storing vehicle location data on the base unit until the base unit is coupled to a portable device.
In another aspect, the invention includes at least one physical computer storage medium including stored instructions. The stored instructions, when executed, determine state fuel tax reporting relating to a CMV. The at least one physical storage medium includes instructions which, when executed by a processor, perform operations. Those operations include defining a geo-fenced region for a jurisdiction, the geo-fenced region having at least one boundary. The operations also include determining, using a positioning system and the geo-fenced region, a location of the vehicle and estimating a location of the vehicle when positioning system information is unavailable for a period of time, including determining if a distance between two consecutive positioning system points is greater than a threshold value and using predetermined route information to estimate where the vehicle has crossed the geo-fenced region boundary. Additionally, the operations include storing vehicle location data on a base unit until the base unit is coupled to a portable device.
In each of the embodiments, distributed processing divides certain tasks between a base unit and a portable device. In one embodiment, the base unit stores geo-fenced region boundaries and generates vehicle location information at specified intervals and when a geo-fenced region boundary is crossed. The portable device reads the vehicle location information and sends it to a fuel tax computing program.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being carried out in various ways.
In one particular embodiment, the invention provides a system for logging performance of a driver operating a vehicle having a vehicle information system from which at least one vehicle operating parameter may be obtained in a performance monitoring process. The vehicle operating parameters collected through the vehicle information system and information such as operator identity from a portable device are wirelessly communicated to a remote host through a network such as the Internet.
The performance monitoring system 100 also includes an electronic on-board recorder (“EOBR”) base unit 116 that communicates with the ECU 112 through an information bus 118 conforming to standards such as SAE J1939 and SAE J1708 network buses. The base unit 116 has a plurality of functions including, but not limited to, time keeping and data logging. In one implementation, the base unit 116 records and stores CMV information or data from the ECU 112 that is necessary to comply with International Fuel Tax Agreement regulations. The base unit 116 stores vehicle location data which includes positioning system information, estimated position information, jurisdiction identifiers, odometer data, and fuel consumption data. The performance monitoring system 100 also includes a portable device such as a mobile phone 120a, a tablet 120b, a laptop computer 120c, or the like, that communicates with the base unit 116. The portable device may be an Android, Apple iOS, Microsoft Windows or similar based device. In one embodiment, the portable device includes an application for logging purposes. The application processes and stores data from the base unit 116 retrieved from the information bus 118. The application allows for manual entries made by the driver. The application also generates Hours of Service (HOS) compliance data, vehicle performance data, and driver performance data. This data includes driving time and driving distance. The base unit 116 communicates with the portable device through a cable or wireless link 122a, 122b, 122c. The link 122a, 122b, 122c may be a serial cable, such as a USB cable. Other exemplary links include a wireless personal-area-network such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Near Field Communication, and the like. The portable device generally supports multiple platforms such as smart phones 120a, tablets 120b, and computers such as laptops 120c.
The performance monitoring system 100 includes a remote server 123 running a remote application, such as a fuel tax computing program, that wirelessly communicates with the portable device via a network such as the Internet, detailed hereinafter. An application on the portable device may send data to the remote server 123 for viewing, reporting, and analyzing. A global position satellite (“GPS”) system or other position determination system 128 also communicates with the ECU 112 and/or the base unit 116 so that information from the GPS system 128 (such as time and location) is available to the CMV 104. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the information stored in the base unit 116 or information communicated to and from the base unit 116 is encrypted.
Processing is distributed or shared between the base unit 116 and the portable device. The base unit 116 stores geo-fenced region boundaries and generates vehicle location information on specified intervals and when a geo-fenced region boundary is crossed. The portable device reads the vehicle location information and sends it to a fuel tax computing program whose flow chart is shown in
As shown, the base unit 116 includes a processor (such as a microprocessor, controller or application-specific-integrated-circuit (“ASIC”)) 202. The processor 202 preferably includes a custom programmed STM32ARM Cortex M3 microcontroller with 768 Kbytes of program flash memory and 96 Kbytes of static RAM memory, running a free license Real Time Operating System such as FreeRTOS. The processor includes a watchdog 204, temp sensor 206, and real-time clock (RTC) 208, which provides a real-time clock function to allow software to accurately determine a time with a predetermined resolution. In some embodiments, the RTC 208 is required to remain operational while the CMV 104 (
The processor 202 is coupled to a storage medium 210. The storage medium 210 is physical, non-transient storage device. The storage medium 210 is preferably a non-volatile 32 megabyte flash memory device, but could also be any type of non-volatile flash memory including a NAND or NOR interface or a serial or parallel interface. In addition, the storage medium 210 may be a combination of RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM, magnetic disk storage, other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that could be used to store computer executable instructions or data structures.
The processor 202 is coupled to an accelerometer 212. The base unit 116 also includes a USB micro AB connector 214 to transmit and receive data through a USB connector of an external portable device. The received data is filtered and protected with a USB protection and filtering module 216 before going to the processor 202. The processor 202 is coupled to a Bluetooth button 218. Additionally, the processor 202 displays the status of the base unit 116 with a plurality of status light-emitting-diodes 220 that are red (R), yellow (Y), blue (B), and green (G).
To communicate with the portable device, the base unit 116 includes a Bluetooth Module 222 configured to be connected to the processor. To receive a GPS signal from the GPS system 128 (
The processor 202 is coupled to a vehicle communication module (VCM) 226. The VCM 226 preferably has 64 Kbytes of programmed flash memory and 20 KB of static RAM memory. This VCM 226 is coupled to a CMV 228 interface connector that connects to the CMV power bus 230. Bus 230 provides communication between the ECU 112 (
In the embodiment shown, the base unit 116 (
The vehicle location data is stored on the base unit 116 (
The base unit 116 (
The vehicle location data is stored on the base unit 116 (
The process continues at step 425 where the processor 202 (
If the current jurisdiction is not the same as the previous jurisdiction, as determined in step 425, then the vehicle 300 (
If positioning system information is unavailable for a period of time, preferably over 15 minutes, this process waits at step 405, until valid positioning system information is available.
If there is no new jurisdiction geo-fenced boundary crossing, as determined in step 500, the process continues to step 515, where the portable device requests and saves the latest vehicle location information record from the base unit 116 (
If the previous vehicle location information record is not NULL as determined at step 615, then the program determines if the current jurisdiction is the same as the previous jurisdiction based on the vehicle location information records. If the jurisdiction is the same, the vehicle 300 (
If the current jurisdiction is not the previous jurisdiction as determined at step 630, then the program determines if the distance between the current vehicle location (from the current vehicle location information record) and the previous vehicle location (from the previous vehicle location information record) is greater than a predetermined threshold, preferably 15 miles, at step 650. If the distance is not greater than the threshold, then the program calculates the distance traveled in the previous jurisdiction by subtracting the starting odometer value from the previous odometer value at step 660. Then the program saves the starting odometer value as the previous odometer value at step 665, and the process loops back to step 610 where the program reads the next vehicle location information record as current.
If the distance between the current vehicle location and the previous vehicle location is greater than a predetermined threshold, preferably 15 miles, at step 650, then the process moves to step 655. At step 655, the routing engine calculates the geo-fenced boundary crossing and the current odometer is set as the previous odometer. The routing engine may be a web service provided by ALK Technologies located in Princeton, N.J., or an application named IntlelliRoute supplied by Rand McNally located in Skokie, Ill. At step 660, the program calculates the distance in the previous state or jurisdiction by subtracting the starting odometer value from the previous odometer value at step 660. Then the program saves the starting odometer value as the previous odometer value at step 665 and the process loops back to step 610 where the program reads the next vehicle location information record as the current record.
In one embodiment, fuel consumption and fuel tax are determined from the mileage, from the distance calculation at step 660 and 640, and from fuel purchases. Records of fuel purchases can be entered and stored on the portable device, or entered into the fuel tax computing program. In another embodiment, fuel purchases are tracked using a fuel card, and the fuel tax computing program imports the fuel purchases from a file generated by the fuel card vendor.
In another embodiment, fuel consumption is calculated directly by the base unit 116 (
(gallons of fuel)=(grams of air)/(air/fuel ratio)/6.17/454
This embodiment uses the density of fuel for a gasoline-powered vehicle. A similar fuel consumption calculation can be made for a diesel-powered vehicle where the gasoline constants change to diesel constants.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5359528 | Haendel et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5694322 | Westerlage et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5928291 | Jenkins et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5970481 | Westerlage et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6253129 | Jenkins et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6571168 | Murphy et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6614394 | Honda et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6714857 | Kapolka et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7072746 | Burch | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7117075 | Larschan et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7881838 | Larschan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7996150 | Nishida | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8018329 | Morgan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032277 | Larschan et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8149163 | Toda | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8284069 | Sverrisson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8442508 | Harter et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8620515 | Kwak | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626568 | Warkentin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8805418 | Nichols | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8909248 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20030163249 | Kapolka | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040243285 | Gounder | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050060070 | Kapolka et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070050108 | Larschan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067228 | Furman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129878 | Pepper | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070177605 | Benco et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090006107 | Golden | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100061190 | Nelson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110218896 | Tonnon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120303256 | Morgan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130006519 | Doherty et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031029 | Davidson | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130054135 | Backsen, Jr. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130226397 | Kuphal et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130302758 | Wright | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150112542 | Fuglewicz | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Federal ELD Regulations, published in the Federal Register, vol. 79, No. 60, Mar. 28, pp. 17655-17724 (2014). |
Comments by Eclipse Software Systems to Proposed Federal ELD Regulations, published at http://www.regulations.gov under docket No. FMCSA-2010-0167 at least as early as Jul. 29, 2015. |
Comments by Inthinc Technology Solutions to Proposed Federal ELD Regulations, published at http://www.regulations.gov under docket No. FMCSA-2010-0167, Jun. 25, 2014. |
Comments by Omnitracs, LLC to Proposed Federal ELD Regulations, published at http://www.regulations.gov under docket No. FMCSA-2010-0167 at least as early as Jul. 29, 2015. |
Comments by Zonar Connected to Proposed Federal ELD Regulations, published at http://www.regulations.gov under docket No. FMCSA-2010-0167 at least as early as Jul. 29, 2016. |
Comments by XRS Corporation to Proposed Federal ELD Regulations, published at http://www.regulations.gov under docket No. FMCSA-2010-0167 at least as early as Jul. 29, 2017. |
Comments by Saucon Technologies to Proposed Federal ELD Regulations, published at http://www.regulations.gov under docket No. FMCSA-2010-0167, Jun. 12, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170076399 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |