Ethylene-based polymer compositions

FIELD OF INVENTION

The instant invention relates to an ethylene-based polymer composition, and the method for producing the same.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There have been many varieties of polyethylene polymers polymerized over the years, including those made using high pressure free radical chemistry (LDPE), more traditional linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) typically made using Ziegler-Natta catalysis and metallocene or constrained geometry catalyzed polyethylene, some linear polyethylenes, but also some substantially linear polyethylene containing slight amount of long chain branching. While these polymers have varying positives and negatives, depending on application or end-use, more control over the polymer structure is still desired.

We have now found that post-metallocene catalysts can efficiently polymerize ethylene into polymers and polymer compositions having controlled comonomer distribution profiles, while also controlling unsaturation levels in the polymer.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The instant invention provides an ethylene-based polymer composition, and the method for producing the same. In one embodiment, the present invention provides an ethylene-based polymer composition characterized by a Comonomer Distribution Constant greater than about 45, more preferably greater than 50, most preferably greater than 95, and as high as 400, preferably as high as 200, wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition has less than 120 total unsaturation unit/1,000,000C. Preferably, the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions comprise up to about 3 long chain branches/1000 carbons, more preferably from about 0.01 to about 3 long chain branches/1000 carbons. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can have a ZSVR of at least 2. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can be further characterized by comprising less than 20 vinylidene unsaturation unit/1,000,000C. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can have a bimodal molecular weight distribution (MWD) or a multi-modal MWD. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can have a comonomer distribution profile comprising a mono or bimodal distribution in the temperature range of from 35° C. to 120° C., excluding purge. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can comprise a single DSC melting peak. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can comprise a weight average molecular weight (Mw) from about 17,000 to about 220,000.

Fabricated articles comprising the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions are also contemplated, especially in the form of at least one film layer. Other embodiments include thermoplastic formulations comprising the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions and at least one natural or synthetic polymer.

The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can be at least partially cross-linked (at least 5% (weight) gel).

In another embodiment, the present invention is a process comprising:

(A) polymerizing ethylene and optionally one or more α-olefins in the presence of a first catalyst to form a semi-crystalline ethylene-based polymer in a first reactor or a first part of a multi-part reactor; and

(B) reacting freshly supplied ethylene and optionally one or more α-olefins in the presence of a second catalyst comprising an organometallic catalyst thereby forming an ethylene-based polymer composition in at least one other reactor or a later part of a multi-part reactor, wherein the catalyst of (A) and (B) can be the same or different and each is a metal complex of a polyvalent aryloxyether corresponding to the formula:

embedded image

where M³is Ti, Hf or Zr, preferably Zr;

Ar⁴is independently in each occurrence a substituted C_9-20aryl group, wherein the substituents, independently in each occurrence, are selected from the group consisting of alkyl; cycloalkyl; and aryl groups; and halo-, trihydrocarbylsilyl- and halohydrocarbyl-substituted derivatives thereof, with the proviso that at least one substituent lacks co-planarity with the aryl group to which it is attached;

T⁴is independently in each occurrence a C_2-20alkylene, cycloalkylene or cycloalkenylene group, or an inertly substituted derivative thereof;

R²¹is independently in each occurrence is hydrogen, halo, hydrocarbyl, trihydrocarbylsilyl, trihydrocarbylsilylhydrocarbyl, alkoxy or di(hydrocarbyl)amino group of up to 50 atoms not counting hydrogen;

R³is independently in each occurrence hydrogen, halo, hydrocarbyl, trihydrocarbylsilyl, trihydrocarbylsilylhydrocarbyl, alkoxy or amino of up to 50 atoms not counting hydrogen, or two R³groups on the same arylene ring together or an R³and an R²¹group on the same or different arylene ring together form a divalent ligand group attached to the arylene group in two positions or join two different arylene rings together; and

R^Dis independently in each occurrence halo or a hydrocarbyl or trihydrocarbylsilyl group of up to 20 atoms not counting hydrogen, or 2 R^Dgroups together are a hydrocarbylene, hydrocarbadiyl, diene, or poly(hydrocarbyl)silylene group.

In yet another embodiment, the present invention is a method of characterizing an ethylene based polymer for comonomer composition distribution (CDC), wherein CDC is calculated from comonomer distribution profile by CEF, and CDC is defined as Comonomer Distribution Index divided by Comonomer Distribution Shape Factor multiplying by 100 as shown in Equation 1, FIG. 1, and wherein Comonomer distribution index stands for the total weight fraction of polymer chains with the comonomer content ranging from 0.5 of median comonomer content (C_median) and 1.5 of C_medianfrom 35.0 to 119.0° C., and wherein Comonomer Distribution Shape Factor is defined as a ratio of the half width of comonomer distribution profile divided by the standard deviation of comonomer distribution profile from the peak temperature (Tp), and wherein the method comprises the following steps:

(A) Obtain a weight fraction at each temperature (T) (w_T(T)) from 35.0° C. to 119.0° C. with a temperature step increase of 0.200° C. from CEF according to Equation 2, as shown in FIG. 2;

(B) Calculate the median temperature (T_median) at cumulative weight fraction of 0.500, according to Equation 3, as shown in FIG. 3;

(C) Calculate the corresponding median comonomer content in mole % (C_median) at the median temperature (T_median) by using comonomer content calibration curve according to Equation 4, as shown in FIG. 4;

(D) Construct a comonomer content calibration curve by using a series of reference materials with known amount of comonomer content, i.e., eleven reference materials with narrow comonomer distribution (mono-modal comonomer distribution in CEF from 35.0 to 119.0° C.) with weight average Mw of 35,000 to 115,000 (measured via conventional GPC) at a comonomer content ranging from 0.0 mole % to 7.0 mole % are analyzed with CEF at the same experimental conditions specified in CEF experimental sections;

(E) Calculate comonomer content calibration by using the peak temperature (T_p) of each reference material and its comonomer content; The calibration is calculated from each reference material as shown in Formula 4, FIG. 4, wherein: R²is the correlation constant;

(F) Calculate Comonomer Distribution Index from the total weight fraction with a comonomer content ranging from 0.5*C_medianto 1.5*C_median, and if T_medianis higher than 98.0° C., Comonomer Distribution Index is defined as 0.95;

(G) Obtain Maximum peak height from CEF comonomer distribution profile by searching each data point for the highest peak from 35.0° C. to 119.0° C. (if the two peaks are identical, then the lower temperature peak is selected); half width is defined as the temperature difference between the front temperature and the rear temperature at the half of the maximum peak height, the front temperature at the half of the maximum peak is searched forward from 35.0° C., while the rear temperature at the half of the maximum peak is searched backward from 119.0° C., in the case of a well defined bimodal distribution where the difference in the peak temperatures is equal to or greater than the 1.1 times of the sum of half width of each peak, the half width of the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition is calculated as the arithmetic average of the half width of each peak;

(H) Calculate the standard deviation of temperature (Stdev) according Equation 5, as shown in FIG. 5.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings a form that is exemplary; it being understood, however, that this invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and illustrations shown.

FIGS. 1-18 illustrate Formulas 1-18, respectively;

FIG. 19 is a graphical illustration of CDC calculation obtaining peak temperature, half width and median temperature from CEF, showing comonomer distribution profile of Example 3;

FIG. 20 is a graph illustrating integration limits for unsaturation for Example 3, the dash line means the position can be slightly different depends on the sample/catalyst;

FIG. 21 illustrates the modified pulse sequences for unsaturation with Bruker AVANCE 400 MHz spectrometer;

FIG. 22 illustrates chemical structure representations of unsaturations; and

FIG. 23 is a graph illustrating the CEF overlays.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The instant invention provides an ethylene-based polymer composition, and the method for producing the same. The inventive ethylene-based polymer composition according to the present inventions is characterized by a Comonomer Distribution Constant greater than about 45, more preferably greater than 50, most preferably greater than 95, and as high as 400, preferably as high as 200, wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition has less than 120 total unsaturation unit/1,000,000C. Preferably, the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions comprise up to about 3 long chain branches/1000 carbons, more preferably from about 0.01 to about 3 long chain branches/1000 carbons. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can have a ZSVR of at least 2. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can be further characterized by comprising less than 20 vinylidene unsaturation unit/1,000,000C. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can have a bimodal molecular weight distribution (MWD) or a multi-modal MWD. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can have a comonomer distribution profile comprising a mono or bimodal distribution in the temperature range of from 35° C. to 120° C., excluding purge. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can comprise a single DSC melting peak. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions can comprise a weight average molecular weight (Mw) from about 17,000 to about 220,000.

The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions are made using a metal complex of a polyvalent aryloxyether.

In one embodiment, the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition is characterized by a Comonomer Distribution Constant greater than about 45, more preferably greater than 50, most preferably greater than 95, and as high as 400, preferably as high as 200, wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition has less than 120 total unsaturation unit/1,000,000C, and wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition comprises up to about 3 long chain branches/1000 carbons, preferably from about 0.01 to about 3 long chain branches/1000 carbons.

In one embodiment, the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition is characterized by a Comonomer Distribution Constant greater than about 45, more preferably greater than 50, most preferably greater than 95, and as high as 400, preferably as high as 200, wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition has less than 120 total unsaturation unit/1,000,000C, and wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition has a ZSVR of at least 2, and optionally the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition is characterized by comprising less than 20 vinylidene unsaturation unit/1,000,000C.

In one embodiment, the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition is characterized by a Comonomer Distribution Constant greater than about 45, more preferably greater than 50, most preferably greater than 95, and as high as 400, preferably as high as 200, wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition has less than 120 total unsaturation unit/1,000,000C, and wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition has been at least partially cross-linked (at least 5% gel).

In one embodiment, the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition is characterized by a Comonomer Distribution Constant greater than about 45, more preferably greater than 50, most preferably greater than 95, and as high as 400, preferably as high as 200, wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition has less than 120 total unsaturation unit/1,000,000C, and wherein the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition has a comonomer distribution profile comprising a mono or bimodal distribution in the temperature range of from 35° C. to 120° C., excluding purge.

The present invention further provides a thermoplastic formulation comprising the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition, as described herein, and at least one natural or synthetic polymer.

The present invention further provides a fabricated article comprising the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition, as described herein.

In another embodiment, the invention is a process comprising:

embedded image

wherein M³is Ti, Hf or Zr, preferably Zr;

T⁴is independently in each occurrence a C_2-20alkylene, cycloalkylene or cycloalkenylene group, or an inertly substituted derivative thereof;

R²¹is independently in each occurrence hydrogen, halo, hydrocarbyl, trihydrocarbylsilyl, trihydrocarbylsilylhydrocarbyl, alkoxy or di(hydrocarbyl)amino group of up to 50 atoms not counting hydrogen;

(A) Obtain a weight fraction at each temperature (T) (w_T(T)) from 35.0° C. to 119.0° C. with a temperature step increase of 0.200° C. from CEF according to Equation 2, as shown in FIG. 2;

(B) Calculate the median temperature (T_median) at cumulative weight fraction of 0.500, according to Equation 3, as shown in FIG. 3;

(H) Calculate the standard deviation of temperature (Stdev) according Equation 5, as shown in FIG. 5.

In some processes, processing aids, such as plasticizers, can also be included in the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions These aids include, but are not limited to, the phthalates, such as dioctyl phthalate and diisobutyl phthalate, natural oils such as lanolin, and paraffin, naphthenic and aromatic oils obtained from petroleum refining, and liquid resins from rosin or petroleum feedstocks. Exemplary classes of oils useful as processing aids include white mineral oil such as KAYDOL oil (Chemtura Corp.; Middlebury, Conn.) and SHELLFLEX 371 naphthenic oil (Shell Lubricants; Houston, Tex.). Another suitable oil is TUFFLO oil (Lyondell Lubricants; Houston, Tex.).

In some processes, inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions are treated with one or more stabilizers, for example, antioxidants, such as IRGANOX 1010 and IRGAFOS 168 (Ciba Specialty Chemicals; Glattbrugg, Switzerland). In general, polymers are treated with one or more stabilizers before an extrusion or other melt processes. In other embodiment processes, other polymeric additives include, but are not limited to, ultraviolet light absorbers, antistatic agents, pigments, dyes, nucleating agents, fillers, slip agents, fire retardants, plasticizers, processing aids, lubricants, stabilizers, smoke inhibitors, viscosity control agents and anti-blocking agents. The inventive ethylene-based polymer composition may, for example, comprise less than 10 percent by the combined weight of one or more additives, based on the weight of the inventive ethylene-based polymer composition and such additives. A particular benefit of the claimed polymers is the absence of catalyst kill agents, other than water, thus eliminating the need for calcium stearate.

The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions produced may further be compounded. In some embodiments, one or more antioxidants may further be compounded into the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions and the compounded inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions is then pelletized. The compounded ethylene-based polymer composition may contain any amount of one or more antioxidants. For example, the compounded inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions may comprise from about 200 to about 600 parts of one or more phenolic antioxidants per one million parts of the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions. In addition, the compounded ethylene-based polymer composition may comprise from about 800 to about 1200 parts of a phosphite-based antioxidant per one million parts of inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions. The compounded inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions may further comprise from about 300 to about 1250 parts of calcium stearate per one million parts of inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions.

Uses

The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions may be employed in a variety of conventional thermoplastic fabrication processes to produce useful articles, including objects comprising at least one film layer, such as a monolayer film, or at least one layer in a multilayer film prepared by cast, blown, calendered, or extrusion coating processes; molded articles, such as blow molded, injection molded, or rotomolded articles; extrusions; fibers; and woven or non-woven fabrics. Thermoplastic compositions comprising the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions include blends with other natural or synthetic materials, polymers, additives, reinforcing agents, ignition resistant additives, antioxidants, stabilizers, colorants, extenders, crosslinkers, blowing agents, and plasticizers.

The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions may be used in producing fibers for other applications. Fibers that may be prepared from the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions or blends thereof include staple fibers, tow, multicomponent, sheath/core, twisted, and monofilament. Suitable fiber forming processes include spunbonded and melt blown techniques, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,563 (Appel, et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,663,220 (Wisneski, et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,668,566 (Nohr, et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 4,322,027 (Reba), gel spun fibers as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,413,110 (Kavesh, et al.), woven and nonwoven fabrics, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,485,706 (May), or structures made from such fibers, including blends with other fibers, such as polyester, nylon or cotton, thermoformed articles, extruded shapes, including profile extrusions and co-extrusions, calendared articles, and drawn, twisted, or crimped yarns or fibers.

Additives and adjuvants may be added to the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions post-formation. Suitable additives include fillers, such as organic or inorganic particles, including clays, talc, titanium dioxide, zeolites, powdered metals, organic or inorganic fibers, including carbon fibers, silicon nitride fibers, steel wire or mesh, and nylon or polyester cording, nano-sized particles, clays, and so forth; tackifiers, oil extenders, including paraffinic or napthelenic oils; and other natural and synthetic polymers, including other polymers that are or can be made according to the embodiment methods.

Blends and mixtures of the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions with other polyolefins may be performed. Suitable polymers for blending with the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions include thermoplastic and non-thermoplastic polymers including natural and synthetic polymers. Exemplary polymers for blending include polypropylene, (such as impact modifying polypropylene, isotactic polypropylene, atactic polypropylene, and random ethylene/propylene copolymers), various types of polyethylene, including high pressure, free-radical LDPE, Ziegler-Natta LLDPE, metallocene PE, including multiple reactor PE (“in reactor” blends of Ziegler-Natta PE and metallocene PE, such as products disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,545,088 (Kolthammer, et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 6,538,070 (Cardwell, et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 6,566,446 (Parikh, et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,844,045 (Kolthammer, et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,869,575 (Kolthammer, et al.); and U.S. Pat. No. 6,448,341 (Kolthammer, et al.)), ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), ethylene/vinyl alcohol copolymers, polystyrene, impact modified polystyrene, ABS, styrene/butadiene block copolymers and hydrogenated derivatives thereof (SBS and SEBS), and thermoplastic polyurethanes. Homogeneous polymers such as olefin plastomers and elastomers, ethylene and propylene-based copolymers (for example, polymers available under the trade designation VERSIFY™ Plastomers & Elastomers (The Dow Chemical Company), SURPASS™ (Nova Chemicals), and VISTAMAXX™ (ExxonMobil Chemical Co.)) can also be useful as components in blends comprising the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions.

The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions may be employed as a sealant resin. Surprisingly, certain Short Chain Branching Distribution (SCBD), as shown by CDC, in combination with certain MWD, and a certain level of long chain branching (LCB) has shown to improve hot tack and heat seal performance, including increased hot-tack and heat-seal strength, lower heat seal and hot tack initiation temperatures, as well as broadening of the hot tack window. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions may be employed as a pipe and tubing resin through an optimization of the SCBD and MWD, with low unsaturation levels for improved ESCR (environmental stress crack resistance) and higher PENT (Pennsylvania Edge-Notch Tensile Test). The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions may be employed in applications where UV stability, weatherability are desired through an optimization of the SCBD and MWD, in combination with low unsaturation levels, as well as low levels of low molecular weight, and high comonomer incorporated oligomers. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions may be employed in applications where low levels of plate-out, blooming, die build-up, smoke formation, extractables, taste, and odor are desired through an optimization of the SCBD and MWD with low levels of low molecular weight as well as high comonomer incorporated oligomers. The inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions may be employed in stretch film applications. Surprisingly, certain SCBD, in combination with certain MWD, and a certain level of long chain branching (LCB) shows improved stretchability and dynamic puncture resistance.

DEFINITIONS

The term “composition,” as used herein, refers to a mixture of materials which comprise the composition, as well as reaction products and decomposition products formed from the materials of the composition.

The terms “blend” or “polymer blend,” as used herein, refers to an intimate physical mixture (that is, without reaction) of two or more polymers. A blend may or may not be miscible (not phase separated at molecular level). A blend may or may not be phase separated. A blend may or may not contain one or more domain configurations, as determined from transmission electron spectroscopy, light scattering, x-ray scattering, and other methods known in the art. The blend may be effected by physically mixing the two or more polymers on the macro level (for example, melt blending resins or compounding) or the micro level (for example, simultaneous forming within the same reactor).

The term “linear,” as used herein, refers to polymers where the polymer backbone lacks measurable or demonstrable long chain branches, for example, the polymer is substituted with an average of less than 0.01 long branch per 1000 carbons.

The term “polymer,” as used herein, refers to a polymeric compound prepared by polymerizing monomers, whether of the same or a different type. The generic term polymer thus embraces the term “homopolymer,” usually employed to refer to polymers prepared from only one type of monomer, and the term “interpolymer” as defined, below. The terms “ethylene/α-olefin polymer” is indicative of interpolymers as described.

The term “interpolymer,” as used herein, refers to polymers prepared by the polymerization of at least two different types of monomers. The generic term interpolymer includes copolymers, usually employed to refer to polymers prepared from two different monomers, and polymers prepared from more than two different types of monomers.

The term “ethylene-based polymer” refers to a polymer that contains more than 50 mole percent polymerized ethylene monomer (based on the total amount of polymerizable monomers) and, optionally, may contain at least one comonomer.

The term “ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer” refers to an interpolymer that contains more than 50 mole percent polymerized ethylene monomer (based on the total amount of polymerizable monomers) and at least one α-olefin.

Resin Production

All raw materials (ethylene, 1-octene) and the process solvent (a narrow boiling range high-purity isoparaffinic solvent commercially available under the tradename Isopar E from ExxonMobil Corporation) are purified with molecular sieves before introduction into the reaction environment. Hydrogen is supplied in pressurized cylinders as a high purity grade and is not further purified. The reactor monomer feed (ethylene) stream is pressurized via mechanical compressor to a pressure that is above the reaction pressure, approximate to 750 psig. The solvent and comonomer (1-octene) feed is pressurized via mechanical positive displacement pump to a pressure that is above the reaction pressure, approximately 750 psig. The individual catalyst components are manually batch diluted to specified component concentrations with purified solvent (Isopar E) and pressurized to a pressure that is above the reaction pressure, approximately 750 psig. All reaction feed flows are measured with mass flow meters, independently controlled with computer automated valve control systems.

The continuous solution polymerization reactor system according to the present invention consist of two liquid full, non-adiabatic, isothermal, circulating, and independently controlled loops operating in a series configuration. Each reactor has independent control of all fresh solvent, monomer, comonomer, hydrogen, and catalyst component feeds. The combined solvent, monomer, comonomer and hydrogen feed to each reactor is independently temperature controlled to anywhere between 5° C. to 50° C. and typically 40° C. by passing the feed stream through a heat exchanger. The fresh comonomer feed to the polymerization reactors can be manually aligned to add comonomer to one of three choices: the first reactor, the second reactor, or the common solvent and then split between both reactors proportionate to the solvent feed split. The total fresh feed to each polymerization reactor is injected into the reactor at two locations per reactor roughly with equal reactor volumes between each injection location. The fresh feed is controlled typically with each injector receiving half of the total fresh feed mass flow. The catalyst components are injected into the polymerization reactor through specially designed injection stingers and are each separately injected into the same relative location in the reactor with no contact time prior to the reactor. The primary catalyst component feed is computer controlled to maintain the reactor monomer concentration at a specified target. The two cocatalyst components are fed based on calculated specified molar ratios to the primary catalyst component. Immediately following each fresh injection location (either feed or catalyst), the feed streams are mixed with the circulating polymerization reactor contents with Kenics static mixing elements. The contents of each reactor are continuously circulated through heat exchangers responsible for removing much of the heat of reaction and with the temperature of the coolant side responsible for maintaining isothermal reaction environment at the specified temperature. Circulation around each reactor loop is provided by a screw pump. The effluent from the first polymerization reactor (containing solvent, monomer, comonomer, hydrogen, catalyst components, and molten polymer) exits the first reactor loop and passes through a control valve (responsible for maintaining the pressure of the first reactor at a specified target) and is injected into the second polymerization reactor of similar design. As the stream exits the reactor, it is contacted with water to stop the reaction. In addition, various additives such as anti-oxidants, can be added at this point. The stream then goes through another set of Kenics static mixing elements to evenly disperse the catalyst kill and additives.

Following additive addition, the effluent (containing solvent, monomer, comonomer, hydrogen, catalyst components, and molten polymer) passes through a heat exchanger to raise the stream temperature in preparation for separation of the polymer from the other lower boiling reaction components. The stream then enters a two stage separation and devolatilization system where the polymer is removed from the solvent, hydrogen, and unreacted monomer and comonomer. The recycled stream is purified before entering the reactor again. The separated and devolatized polymer melt is pumped through a die specially designed for underwater pelletization, cut into uniform solid pellets, dried, and transferred into a hopper. The polymer properties are then validated.

The non-polymer portions removed in the devolatilization step pass through various pieces of equipment, which separate most of the ethylene that is removed from the system to a vent destruction unit (it is, however, recycled in manufacturing units). Most of the solvent is recycled back to the reactor after passing through purification beds. This solvent can still have unreacted co-monomer in it that is fortified with fresh co-monomer prior to re-entry to the reactor. This fortification of the co-monomer is an essential part of the product density control method. This recycle solvent can still have some hydrogen which is then fortified with fresh hydrogen to achieve the polymer molecular weight target. A very small amount of solvent leaves the system as a co-product due to solvent carrier in the catalyst streams and a small amount of solvent that is part of commercial grade co-monomers.

Inventive Ethylene-Based Polymer Compositions
Inventive Examples 1-3

Inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions, i.e. Inventive Example 1-3, are prepared according to the above procedure. The process conditions are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. Inventive Examples 1-3 were tested for various properties according to the test methods described below, and these properties are reported in Tables 3-8. Referring to Table 2, MMAO is modified methyl aluminoxane; RIBS-2 is bis(hydrogenated tallow alkyl)methyl, tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate(1-)amine; and Zirconium based catalyst is [2,2′″-[1,3-propanediylbis(oxy-κO)]bis[3″,5,5″-tris(1,1-dimethylethyl)-5′-methyl[1,1′:3′,1″-terphenyl]-2′-olato-κO]]dimethyl-, (OC-6-33)-Zirconium, represented by the following formula:

embedded image

Comparative Ethylene-Based Compositions
Comparative Examples 1-3

Comparative Example 1 is 50/50 blend of an ethylene/hexane copolymer having an I₂of 1 g/10 minutes and density of 0.918 g/cm³, which was provided by The Dow Chemical Company under the tradename EXCEED™ 1018, and an ethylene/hexane copolymer having an I₂of 3.5 g/10 minutes and density of 0.912 g/cm³, which was also provided by The Dow Chemical Company under the tradename EXCEED™ 3512.

Comparative Example 2 is an ethylene/octane copolymer having I₂of 1 g/10 minutes and density of 0.916 g/cm³, which was provided by The Dow Chemical Company under the tradename ELITE™ 5400G.

Comparative Example 3 is an ethylene/octane copolymer having I₂of 1.5 g/10 minutes and density of 0.914 g/cm³, which was provided by The Dow Chemical Company under the tradename ELITE™ 5500.

The Comparative Examples 1-3 were tested for various properties according to the test methods described below, and these properties are reported in Tables 3-8.

Inventive Films 1 and 3

Inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions, Inventive Example 1 and 3, are blown into Inventive Monolayer Films 1 and 3 on a three layer blown film line. The blown film line consists of three groove fed extruders with single flight screws (25:30:25 mm) The length/diameter (L/D) ratio for all screws is 25:1. The blown film line has a 60 mm die with dual lip air ring cooling system, with a screen pack configuration of 20:40:60:80:20 mesh. Inventive Films 1 and 3 are produced at 1 mil thickness. The film fabrication conditions are reported in Table 9. The Inventive Films 1 and 3 are tested for their various properties according to the test methods described below, and these properties are reported in Table 10.

Comparative Films 2 and 3

Comparative ethylene-based polymer compositions, Comparative Example 2 and 3 are blown into Comparative Monolayer Films 2 and 3 on a three layer blown film line. The blown film line consists of three groove fed extruders with single flight screws (25:30:25 mm) The length/diameter (L/D) ratio for all screws is 25:1. The blown film line has a 60 mm die with dual lip air ring cooling system, with a screen pack configuration of 20:40:60:80:20 mesh. Comparative Films 2 and 3 are produced at 1 mil thickness. The film fabrication conditions are reported in Table 9. The Comparative Films 2 and 3 are tested for their various properties according to the test methods described below, and these properties are reported in Table 10.

Inventive Three Layer Films A and B

Referring to Tables 11A and B, Inventive Three Layer Films A and B are fabricated according to the following procedure. The Fabrication conditions are reported in Tables 12 and 13.

Inventive Three Layer Film A comprises (1) a sealant layer comprising 96.75 percent by weight of the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions of Inventive Example 3, 1000 parts per million (ppm) by weight of a slip agent (Erucamide), and 2500 ppm by weight of an antiblocking agent (diamatious earth-antiblock) with the remaining weight being LDPE as the carrier for slip agent and antiblock agent; (2) a core layer comprising 72.1 percent by weight of DOWLEX™ 2045. 11G, an ethylene copolymer (ethylene-octene copolymer) having a density of approximately 0.922 g/cm³and a melt index (measured at 190° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 1.0 g/10 minutes, 25 percent by weight of INSPIRE™ 114, a propylene based polymer having a density of approximately 0.900 g/cm³and a melt flow rate (measured at 230° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 0.50 g/10 minutes, 1200 parts per million (ppm) by weight of a slip agent (Erucamide), and 3000 ppm by weight of an antiblocking agent (diamatious earth-antiblock) with the remaining weight being LDPE as the carrier for slip agent and antiblock agent; (3) a skin layer comprising 96.1 percent by weight of DOWLEX™ 2045. 11G, an ethylene copolymer (ethylene-octene copolymer) having a density of approximately 0.922 g/cm³and a melt index (measured at 190° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 1.0 g/10 minutes, 1200 parts per million (ppm) by weight of a slip agent (Erucamide), and 3000 ppm by weight of an antiblocking agent (diamatious earth-antiblock) with the remaining weight being LDPE as the carrier for slip agent and antiblock agent. Inventive Three Layer Film B comprises (1) a sealant layer comprising 96.75 percent by weight of the inventive ethylene-based polymer compositions of Inventive Example 1, 1000 parts per million (ppm) by weight of a slip agent (Erucamide), and 2500 ppm by weight of an antiblocking agent (diamatious earth-antiblock) with the remaining weight being LDPE as the carrier for slip agent and antiblock agent; (2) a core layer comprising 72.1 percent by weight of DOWLEX™ 2045. 11G, an ethylene copolymer (ethylene-octene copolymer) having a density of approximately 0.922 g/cm³and a melt index (measured at 190° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 1.0 g/10 minutes, 25 percent by weight of INSPIRE™ 114, a propylene based polymer having a density of approximately 0.900 g/cm³and a melt flow rate (measured at 230° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 0.50 g/10 minutes, 1200 parts per million (ppm) by weight of a slip agent (Erucamide), and 3000 ppm by weight of an antiblocking agent (diamatious earth-antiblock) with the remaining weight being LDPE as the carrier for slip agent and antiblock agent; (3) a skin layer comprising 96.1 percent by weight of DOWLEX™ 2045. 11G, an ethylene copolymer (ethylene-octene copolymer) having a density of approximately 0.922 g/cm³and a melt index (measured at 190° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 1.0 g/10 minutes, 1200 parts per million (ppm) by weight of a slip agent (Erucamide), and 3000 ppm by weight of an antiblocking agent (diamatious earth-antiblock) with the remaining weight being LDPE as the carrier for slip agent and antiblock agent

The inventive three layer co-extruded films are fabricated on a three layer co-extruded blown film line consisting of two 2.5 inch 24:1 L/D Egan extruders (Extruders A and B) and one 2 inch 24:1 L/D Johnson extruder (Extruder C). All the extruders are smooth bore with barrel heating and cooling (closed loop liquid cooling system). The extruders are powered by 60, 75, and 20 HP DC drivers, respectively. The extruders are controlled by an Extrol 6032 microprocessor. The extrusion process is monitored by Pressure Transducers, three on the 2½″ barrels, one before and one after each breaker plate as well as 4 heater zones on each barrel, one each at the adapter and the block and two zones on the die. The Microprocessor also tracks the extruder RPM, % FLC, HP, Rate, Layflat and melt temperature at each extruder. The die is a 6 inch Battenfeld-Gloucester with a layer ratio of 15:75:15% and a 70 mil die gap. The standard screws used are New Castle's single flight high shear screws with a 2.88 compression ratio on Extruder A; Feed Screw's Modified Double mix with a 3.64 compression ratio on Extruder B; and Johnson single flight with a 2.5 compression ratio on Extruder C. Co-extruded film structure of 2.5 mil film (1.0 mil sealant/1.0 mil core/0.5 mil skin layer), slit to 21.5″, cut flush with core, was produced at a 2.5:1 BUR. The screen pack configuration was 20:40:60:80:20 mesh.

Inventive Three Layer Films A and B are evaluated on a Weigh Pack Systems XPDIUS ELITE series VFS bagger, and the results are shown in Table 14. The Weigh Pack VFFS packaging equipment used poly sealing jaws: false jaws+seal jaws, where the seal jaws back is concave and the front is jaw is convex. The catch plates are V-shaped just above seal jaws. The jaw strength is set at 180 units, based on the servo motor. The fin seal jaw is set at 50 psi dwell pressure.

Bags are tested using 2 lbs of measured dry red beans as the fill product. Pre-measured 2 lbs amounts of dry red beans are poured by hand into the VFFS bags via the forming collar. Products are evaluated for minimum seal temperature and minimum dwell time, two critical parameters for maximization of VFFS production rate. The minimum seal temperature is determined by filling the VFFS bags with 2 lbs worth of dried beans at a constant dwell time (1.35 s) and lowering the seal temperature until the VFFS bags would no longer hold the dried beans. To determine the minimum dwell time pillow pouches are made (VFFS bags with no product). The tests are started at 5° C. above the minimum seal temperature required to hold 2 lbs of dried beans. The seal bar dwell time is then shortened until the VFFS bag would no longer hold a seal.

For the minimum seal temperature determination, after the packages are made, they are allowed to “setup” for approximately 30 seconds and then vigorously shook to make sure the content held for the 2 lb bean packages. For the minimum dwell temperature determination the air-filled-only pillow pouches are allowed to setup for approximately 30 second to allow the seal to set-up and then hand pressure is applied to the packages to make sure they would not burst open at the seal or have a large “channel” leaker. A channel leaker is a large hole formed at the point where either of the seals on the ends of the package overlapped with long seal on the long-edge of the package. A hermetic (air-tight) seal is not required for most solid food applications, including frozen foods. The results are reported in Table 14.

Comparative Three Layer Film A

Referring to Table 11C, Comparative Three Layer Film A is fabricated according to the following procedure. The Fabrication conditions are reported in Tables 12 and 13.

Comparative Three Layer Film A comprises (1) a sealant layer comprising 96.75 percent by weight of ELITE™ 5500G, an ethylene/octane copolymer having a melt index (I₂) (measured at 190° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 1.5 g/10 minutes and a density of approximately 0.914 g/cm³, 1000 parts per million (ppm) by weight of a slip agent (Erucamide), and 2500 ppm by weight of an antiblocking agent (diamatious earth-antiblock) with the remaining weight being LDPE as the carrier for slip agent and antiblock agent; (2) a core layer comprising 72.1 percent by weight of DOWLEX™ 2045. 11G, an ethylene copolymer (ethylene-octene copolymer) having a density of approximately 0.922 g/cm³and a melt index (measured at 190° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 1.0 g/10 minutes, 25 percent by weight of INSPIRE™ 114, a propylene based polymer having a density of approximately 0.900 g/cm³and a melt flow rate (measured at 230° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 0.50 g/10 minutes, 1200 parts per million (ppm) by weight of a slip agent (Erucamide), and 3000 ppm by weight of an antiblocking agent (diamatious earth-antiblock) with the remaining weight being LDPE as the carrier for slip agent and antiblock agent; (3) a skin layer comprising 96.1 percent by weight of DOWLEX™ 2045. 11G, an ethylene copolymer (ethylene-octene copolymer) having a density of approximately 0.922 g/cm³and a melt index (measured at 190° C. and 2.16 kg) of approximately 1.0 g/10 minutes, 1200 parts per million (ppm) by weight of a slip agent (Erucamide), and 3000 ppm by weight of an antiblocking agent (diamatious earth-antiblock) with the remaining weight being LDPE as the carrier for slip agent and antiblock agent.

Comparative Three Layer Film A is fabricated on a three layer co-extruded blown film line consisting of two 2.5 inch 24:1 L/D Egan extruders (Extruders A and B) and one 2 inch 24:1 L/D Johnson extruder (Extruder C). All the extruders are smooth bore with barrel heating and cooling (closed loop liquid cooling system). The extruders are powered by 60, 75, and 20 HP DC drivers, respectively. The extruders are controlled by an Extrol 6032 microprocessor. The extrusion process is monitored by Pressure Transducers, three on the 2½″ barrels, one before and one after each breaker plate as well as 4 heater zones on each barrel, one each at the adapter and the block and two zones on the die. The Microprocessor also tracks the extruder RPM, % FLC, HP, Rate, Layflat and melt temperature at each extruder. The die is a 6 inch Battenfeld-Gloucester with a layer ratio of 15:75:15% and a 70 mil die gap. The standard screws used are New Castle's single flight high shear screws with a 2.88 compression ratio on Extruder A; Feed Screw's Modified Double mix with a 3.64 compression ratio on Extruder B; and Johnson single flight with a 2.5 compression ratio on Extruder C. Co-extruded film structure of 2.5 mil film (1.0 mil sealant/1.0 mil core/0.5 mil skin layer), slit to 21.5″, cut flush with core, was produced at a 2.5:1 BUR. The screen pack configuration was 20:40:60:80:20 mesh.

Comparative Three Layer Film A is evaluated on a Weigh Pack Systems XPDIUS ELITE series VFS bagger. The Weigh Pack VFFS packaging equipment used poly sealing jaws: false jaws+seal jaws, where the seal jaws back is concave and the front is jaw is convex. The catch plates are V-shaped just above seal jaws. The jaw strength is set at 180 units, based on the servo motor. The fin seal jaw is set at 50 psi dwell pressure.

TABLE 1

Inventive
Inventive
Inventive

Units
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3

Primary Reactor Feed Temperature
° C.
20
20
20

Primary Reactor Total Solvent Flow
lbs/hr
1,161
1,160
1159

Primary Reactor Total Ethylene Flow
lbs/hr
178
199
220

Primary Reactor Total Comonomer
lbs/hr
76
15
92

Flow

Primary Reactor Feed
—
6.9
6.9
5.5

Solvent/Ethylene Ratio

Primary Reactor Fresh Hydrogen Flow
Standard
3,383
701
6,485

cm³/minute

Secondary Reactor Feed Temperature
° C.
21
32
20

Secondary Reactor Total Solvent Flow
lbs/hr
510
340
400

Secondary Reactor Total Ethylene
lbs/hr
196
127
153

Flow

Secondary Reactor Total Comonomer
lbs/hr
13.5
1.8
16.1

Flow

Secondary Reactor Feed
—
2.7
2.8
2.7

Solvent/Ethylene Ratio

Secondary Reactor Fresh Hydrogen
Standard
4,990
21,857
2,047

Flow
cm³/minute

Primary Reactor Control Temperature
° C.
140
180
155

Primary Reactor Pressure
psig
725
725
725

Primary Reactor Ethylene Conversion
%
92
91
81

Primary Reactor Percent Solids
%
16
13
16

Secondary Reactor Heat Transfer
BTU/hr ft³° F.
6.7
9.1
7.6

Coefficient

Primary Reactor Polymer Residence
hrs
0.27
0.29
0.25

Time

Secondary Reactor Control
° C.
190
190
190

Temperature

Secondary Reactor Pressure
psig
731
730
729

Secondary Reactor Ethylene
%
87
85
87

Conversion

Secondary Reactor Percent Solids
%
21
17
22

Secondary Reactor Heat Transfer
BTU/hr ft³° F.
51
44
80

Coefficient

Secondary Reactor Polymer Residence
hrs
0.10
0.12
0.10

Time

Primary Reactor Split
%
50
56
53

Primary Reactor Production Rate
lbs/hr
212
160
226

Secondary Reactor
lbs/hr
215
127
201

Production Rate

Total Production Rate from
lbs/hr
426
287
427

MB

Primary Reactor Catalyst
10⁶Lbs
8.6
2.3
10.9

Efficiency

Secondary Reactor Catalyst
10⁶Lbs
1.6
1.1
1.4

Efficiency

TABLE 2

Inventive
Inventive
Inventive

Units
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3

Primary Reactor Catalyst Flow
lbs/hr
1.81
1.962134
1.52

Primary Reactor Catalyst Concentration
ppm
13.67
34.95987
13.67

Primary Reactor Catalyst Efficiency
10⁶lbs
8.56
2.309096
10.87

Primary Reactor Catalyst - Type 1
—
Zirconium
Zirconium
Zirconium

Based
Based
Based

Catalyst
Catalyst
Catalyst

Primary Reactor Catalyst - 1 Flow
lbs/hr
1.81
1.96
1.52

Primary Reactor Catalyst - 1
ppm
13.67
34.96
13.67

Concentration

Primary Reactor Catalyst - 1
Mole
90.86
90.86
90.86

Weight

Primary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 1
Molar
1.48
1.42
1.77

Ratio

Primary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 1 Type
—
MMAO
MMAO
MMAO

Primary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 1 Flow
lbs/hr
0.81
1.19
0.81

Primary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 1
ppm
598
1,094
596

Concentration

Primary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 2
Molar
6.91
6.97
7.11

Ratio

Primary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 2 Type
—
RIBS-2
RIBS-2
RIBS-2

Primary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 2 Flow
lbs/hr
0.52
0.72
0.44

Primary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 2
ppm
99.6
199
99.6

Concentration

Secondary Reactor Catalyst Type
—
Zirconium
Zirconium
Zirconium

Based
Based
Based

Catalyst
Catalyst
Catalyst

Secondary Reactor Catalyst Flow
lbs/hr
2.30
1.54
3.52

Secondary Reactor Catalyst
ppm
60
76
40

Concentration

Secondary Reactor Catalyst Efficiency
10⁶lbs
1.56
1.08
1.43

Secondary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 1
Molar
1.50
1.21

Ratio

Secondary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 1 Type
—
MMAO
MMAO
MMAO

Secondary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 1 Flow
lbs/hr
4.59
1.68
4.62

Secondary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 2
Molar
7.02
6.96
6.99

Ratio

Secondary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 2 Type
—
RIBS-2
RIBS-2
RIBS-2

Secondary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 2 Flow
lbs/hr
2.88
1.22
2.93

Secondary Reactor Co-Catalyst - 2
ppm
100
199
100

Concentration

TABLE 3

Density(g/cc)
I₁₀(g/10 min)
I₂(g/10 min)
I₁₀/I₂

Inventive
0.912
11.5
1.5
7.7

Example 1

Inventive
0.937
7.1
0.4
16.1

Example 2

Inventive
0.912
11.5
1.6
7.4

Example 3

Comparative
0.916
9.1
1.6
5.9

Example 1

Comparative
0.916
8.5
1.0
8.4

Example 2

Comparative
0.914
11.2
1.5
7.3

Example 3

TABLE 4

Unsaturation Unit/1,000,000 C

vinylene
trisubstituted
vinyl
vinylidene
Total

Inventive
6
2
47
7
62

Example 1

Inventive
5
1
59
6
71

Example 2

Inventive
9
2
55
12
78

Example 3

Comparative
21
46
54
24
145

Example 1

Comparative
52
51
171
40
314

Example 2

Comparative
41
32
149
30
252

Example 3

TABLE 5

CDC

Comonomer

Half
(Comonomer

Distribution

Half
Width/
Distribution

Index
Stdev, C
Width
Stdev
Constant)

Inventive
0.873
12.301
16.823
1.368
63.8

Example 1

Inventive
0.838
6.250
3.721
0.595
140.9

Example 2

Inventive
0.802
11.003
5.788
0.526
152.4

Example 3

Comparative
0.662
10.508
25.270
2.405
27.5

Example 1

Comparative
0.515
18.448
36.739
1.991
25.9

Example 2

Comparative
0.246
27.884
42.670
1.530
16.1

Example 3

TABLE 6

Cool Curve Data
Heat Curve Data

ΔH of

ΔH of

T_c(° C.)
Crystallization (J/g)
T_m(° C.)
melting (J/g)

Inventive
95.21
130.7
110.82
132.2

Example 1

Inventive
112.97
179.6
123.79
178.4

Example 2

Inventive
93.97
130.4
108.33
131.7

Example 3

Comparative
103.92
126.7
117.55
129.5

Example 1

Comparative
105.1
141.6
123.63
143

Example 2

Comparative
106.55
137.5
124
137.4

Example 3

TABLE 7

Mw/

Identification
Test Method
Mn
Mw
Mz
Mn

Inventive Example
Conventional
32,370
86,200
170,500
2.7

1
GPC

Inventive Example
Conventional
14,630
103,100
282,600
7.0

2
GPC

Inventive Example
Conventional
33,750
84,080
159,600
2.5

3
GPC

Comparative
Conventional
36,780
95,950
174,500
2.6

Example 1
GPC

Comparative
Conventional
24,600
101,900
238,200
4.1

Example 2
GPC

Comparative
Conventional
28,800
105,100
374,900
3.6

Example 3
GPC

TABLE 8

Shear Rate (1/sec) @ 190° C.

G′ (Pa)
G″ (Pa)
Eta* (Pa-s)

0.1
1
10
100
0.1
1
10
100
0.1
1
10
100

Inventive
66
1,221
12,621
85,376
620
4,696
27,476
102,830
6,240
4,825
3,024
1,337

Example 1

Inventive
1,764
7,855
30,375
111,000
2,756
9,716
33,986
87,314
32,724
12,494
4,558
1,412

Example 2

Inventive
52
1,054
11,539
84,139
569
4,411
26,910
103,850
5,716
4,535
2,928
1,337

Example 3

Comparative
8
270
8,214
97,443
378
3,670
29,450
128,860
3,781
3,679
3,057
1,616

Example 1

Comparative
199
2,134
18,203
102,500
957
6,275
32,869
104,710
9,775
6,628
3,757
1,465

Example 2

Comparative
34
892
11,631
86,949
529
4,404
27,610
104,400
5,296
4,493
2,996
1,359

Example 3

TABLE 9

Inventive
Comparative
Comparative
Inventive

Parameter
Unit
Film 1
Film 2
Film 3
Film 3

Actual Speed
m/min
17.3
22.2
17.4
17.3

Actual Rate
kg/hr
27.6
10.9
13.2
14.7

Motor Load
Amp
6
6
6
6

Screw Speed
rpm
50
50
50
50

Pressure
Bar
289
306
300
287

Melt Temperature
° C.
186
N/A
185
185

(Instrumen-

tation

Failure)

Layflat Width
cm
23.8
23.5
23.8
23.8

Temperature Profile

Set
Actual
Set
Actual
Set
Actual
Set
Actual

Core Barrel 1
° C.
180
180
170
170
180
180
180
180

Core Barrel 2
° C.
195
196
220
220
195
195
195
194

Core Barrel 3
° C.
190
189
175
175
190
189
190
189

Core Barrel 4
° C.
190
189
175
175
190
191
190
191

Adapter Temperature
° C.
210
210
225
225
210
210
210
210

Tube
° C.
210
210
225
225
210
210
210
210

Die Temperature 5
° C.
210
210
225
225
210
210
210
210

Die Temperature 4
° C.
210
210
225
225
210
210
210
210

Die Temperature 3
° C.
210
210
225
225
210
210
210
210

Die Temperature 2
° C.
210
210
225
226
210
210
210
210

Die Temperature 1
° C.
210
210
225
225
210
210
210
210

Die Gap
mil
2
2
2
2

Frost Line
inch
7
7
7
7

BUR

2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5

TABLE 10

Inventive
Inventive
Comparative
Comparative

Film 1
Film 3
Film 2
Film 3

Gloss 45 deg (%)
76
83
78
91

Haze-Film (%)
7
5
6
4

Haze Internal (%)
0.6
0.5
1.3
1.3

Dart A (g)
850
850
850
703

Dart B (g)
580
676
666
—

Elmendorf Tear MD Normalized
334
378
256
376

(g/mil)

Elmendorf Tear CD Normalized
465
521
535
614

(g/mil)

Puncture (ft * lbf/in(3{circumflex over ( )})
237
342
399
146

Tensile-CD-Break Stress (psi)
6,336
6,811
7,039
6,419

Tensile-CD-Energy to Break (in * lbf)
32
34
33
34

Tensile-CD-Strain to Break (%)
641
670
678
666

Tensile-CD-Stress at Yield (psi)
1,419
1,404
1,595
1,477

Tensile-MD-Break Stress (psi)
6,830
7,417
7,320
7,046

Tensile-MD-Energy to Break (in * lbf)
26
28
24
30

Tensile-MD-Strain to Break (%)
476
506
436
525

Tensile-MD-Stress at Yield (psi)
1,713
1,684
1,607
1,654

TABLE 11A

Inventive Three Layer Film A

For Sealant
Inventive
96.75 wt %
2.0 wt % Slip
1.25 wt %
1000 ppm Slip
2500 ppm

Layer
Example 3 +
Inventive
Agent (LDPE
Antiblock Agent
Agent in Sealant
Antiblock in

Slip Agent +
Example 3
based)
(LDPE based)
Layer
Sealant Layer

Antiblock Agent

For Skin Layer
DOWLEX
96.1 wt %
2.4 wt % Slip
1.5 wt %
1200 ppm Slip
3000 ppm

2045.11G + Slip
DOWLEX
Agent (LDPE
Antiblock Agent
Agent in Skin
Antiblock in

Agent +
2045.11G
based)
(LDPE based)
Layer
Skin Layer

Antiblock Agent

For Core Layer
DOWLEX
72.1 wt %
2.4 wt % Slip
1.5 wt %
1200 ppm Slip
3000 ppm

2045.11G + 25 wt
DOWLEX
Agent (LDPE
Antiblock Agent
Agent in Core
Antiblock in

% INSPIRE
2045.11G
based)
(LDPE based)
Layer
Core Layer

114 PP + Slip

Agent +

Antiblock Agent

TABLE 11B

Inventive Three Layer Film B

For Sealant
Inventive
96.75 wt %
2.0 wt % Slip
1.25 wt %
1000 ppm Slip
2500 ppm

Layer
Example 1 +
Inventive
Agent (LDPE
Antiblock Agent
Agent in Sealant
Antiblock in

Slip Agent +
Example 1
based)
(LDPE based)
Layer
Sealant Layer

Antiblock Agent

For Skin Layer
DOWLEX
96.1 wt %
2.4 wt % Slip
1.5 wt %
1200 ppm Slip
3000 ppm

2045.11G + Slip
DOWLEX
Agent (LDPE
Antiblock Agent
Agent in Skin
Antiblock in

Agent +
2045.11G
based)
(LDPE based)
Layer
Skin Layer

Antiblock Agent

For Core Layer
DOWLEX
72.1 wt %
2.4 wt % Slip
1.5 wt %
1200 ppm Slip
3000 ppm

2045.11G + 25 wt
DOWLEX
Agent (LDPE
Antiblock Agent
Agent in Core
Antiblock in

% INSPIRE
2045.11G
based)
(LDPE based)
Layer
Core Layer

114 PP + Slip

Agent +

Antiblock Agent

TABLE 11C

Comparative Three Layer Film A

For Sealant
Comparative
96.75 wt %
2.0 wt % Slip
1.25 wt %
1000 ppm Slip
2500 ppm

Layer
Example 3 +
ELITE 5500G
Agent (LDPE
Antiblock
Agent in Sealant
Antiblock in

Slip Agent +

based)
(LDPE based)
Layer
Sealant Layer

Antiblock Agent

For Skin Layer
DOWLEX
96.1 wt %
2.4 wt % Slip
1.5 wt %
1200 ppm Slip
3000 ppm

2045.11G + Slip
DOWLEX
Agent (LDPE
Antiblock Agent
Agent in Skin
Antiblock in

Agent +
2045.11G
based)
(LDPE based)
Layer
Skin Layer

Antiblock Agent

For Core Layer
DOWLEX
72.1 wt %
2.4 wt % Slip
1.5 wt %
1200 ppm Slip
3000 ppm

2045.11G + 25 wt
DOWLEX
Agent (LDPE
Antiblock Agent
Agent in Core
Antiblock in

% INSPIRE
2045.11G
based)
(LDPE based)
Layer
Core Layer

114 PP + Slip

Agent +

Antiblock Agent

TABLE 12

Inventive Three Layer Film A

Sealant

Parameter
Unit
Layer
Core Layer
Skin Layer

Actual Speed
RPM
47.2
48.1
29.5

Actual Rate
lb/hr
63.6
64
32.4

Layer Ratio
%
40
40
20

% FLC

56.9
37.1
15.3

HP

13
7
2

Pressure 1
psi
—
1,060
—

Pressure 2
psi
2,050
1,230
—

Pressure 3
psi
5,780
2,700
—

Screen Pressure
psi
5,310
—
4,200

Adaptor
psi
4,170
2,480
3,500

Pressure

Melt
° F.
422
425
414

Temperature

Layflat Width
cm
60
60
60

Temperature

Layer A
Layer B
Layer C

Profile

Set
Actual
Set
Actual
Set
Actual

Barrel 1
° F.
375
375
375
375
375
377

Barrel 2
° F.
425
425
425
425
425
426

Barrel 3
° F.
380
380
380
383
400
400

Barrel 4
° F.
380
377
380
381
400
400

Adapter
° F.
400
400
400
400
420
420

Block
° F.

450
446

Lower Die
° F.

450
450

Upper Die
° F.

450
450

Inner Die

450
450

External Air
° C.

45
45

Temp

Internal Air
° C.

45
75

Temp

Die Gap
mil

70

Overall Speed
RPM

53.6

Overall Rate
lb/hr

160

BUR

2.5

TABLE 13

Inventive Three Layer Film B
Comparative Three Layer Film A

Parameter
Unit
Sealant Layer
Core Layer
Skin Layer
Sealant Layer
Core Layer
Skin Layer

Actual Speed
RPM
48.2
47.6
29.1
50.1
48.5
29.5

Actual Rate
lb/hr
64.4
64.3
32.1
63.5
64.3
32.5

Layer Ratio
%
40
40
20
40
40
20

% FLC

57.7
36.5
15.2
58.2
37.3
15.6

HP

13
7
2
14
7
2

Pressure 1
psi
—
1,130
—
—
1,080
—

Pressure 2
psi
2,570
1,490
—
1,950
1,120
—

Pressure 3
psi
5,500
2,720
—
5,750
2,750
—

Screen Pressure
psi
5,460
—
4,120
5,460
—
4,260

Adaptor Pressure
psi
4,260
2,470
3,450
4,380
2,530
3,540

Melt Temperature
° F.
426
424
415
425
425
413

Layflat Width
cm
60
60
60
60
60
60

Layer A
Layer B
Layer C
Layer A
Layer B
Layer C

Parameter
Unit
Set
Actual
Set
Actual
Set
Actual
Set
Actual
Set
Actual
Set
Actual

Temperature Profile

Barrel 1
° F.
375
376
375
375
375
374
375
376
375
375
375
374

Barrel 2
° F.
425
425
425
426
425
425
425
425
425
426
425
425

Barrel 3
° F.
380
382
380
376
400
400
380
380
380
381
400
400

Barrel 4
° F.
380
385
380
383
400
400
380
385
380
381
400
400

Adapter
° F.
400
400
400
399
420
420
400
400
400
400
420
421

Block
° F.

450
448

450
447

Lower Die
° F.

450
450

450
450

Upper Die
° F.

450
450

450
450

Inner Die

450
450

450
451

External Air Temp
° C.

45
45

45
45

Internal Air Temp
° C.

45
75

45
74

Inventive Three Layer Film B
Comparative Three Layer Film A

Parameter
Unit
Sealant Layer
Core Layer
Sealant Layer
Core Layer
Sealant Layer
Core Layer

Temperature Profile

Die Gap
mil

70

70

Overall Speed
RPM

50.8

53.6

Overall Rate
lb/hr

161

160

BUR

2.5

2.5

TABLE 14

Minimum Seal

Temperature 2 lb
Minimum dwell time

fill weight/1.35
Air fill/Minimum

seconds dwell time
fill temperature

Dwell Time

Dwell Time

Film
HTIT (° C.)
(s)
HTIT (° C.)
(s)

Comparative
Fail
Fail
140
2

Three Layer

Film A

Inventive Three
130
1.35
135
1.15

Layer Film A

Inventive Three
135
1.35
135
1.25

Layer Film B

Test Methods

Density

Samples that are measured for density are prepared according to ASTM D-1928. Measurements are made within one hour of sample pressing using ASTM D-792, Method B.

Melt Index

Melt index, or I₂, is measured in accordance with ASTM-D 1238, Condition 190° C./2.16 kg, and is reported in grams eluted per 10 minutes. I₁₀is measured in accordance with ASTM-D 1238, Condition 190° C./10 kg, and is reported in grams eluted per 10 minutes.

DSC Crystallinity

Differential Scanning calorimetry (DSC) can be used to measure the melting and crystallization behavior of a polymer over a wide range of temperature. For example, the TA Instruments Q1000 DSC, equipped with an RCS (refrigerated cooling system) and an autosampler is used to perform this analysis. During testing, a nitrogen purge gas flow of 50 ml/min is used. Each sample is melt pressed into a thin film at about 175° C.; the melted sample is then air-cooled to room temperature (˜25° C.). A 3-10 mg, 6 mm diameter specimen is extracted from the cooled polymer, weighed, placed in a light aluminum pan (ca 50 mg), and crimped shut. Analysis is then performed to determine its thermal properties.

The thermal behavior of the sample is determined by ramping the sample temperature up and down to create a heat flow versus temperature profile. First, the sample is rapidly heated to 180° C. and held isothermal for 3 minutes in order to remove its thermal history. Next, the sample is cooled to −40° C. at a 10° C./minute cooling rate and held isothermal at −40° C. for 3 minutes. The sample is then heated to 150° C. (this is the “second heat” ramp) at a 10° C./minute heating rate. The cooling and second heating curves are recorded. The cool curve is analyzed by setting baseline endpoints from the beginning of crystallization to −20° C. The heat curve is analyzed by setting baseline endpoints from −20° C. to the end of melt. The values determined are peak melting temperature (T_m), peak crystallization temperature (T_c), heat of fusion (H_f) (in Joules per gram), and the calculated % crystallinity for polyethylene samples using Equation 6, shown in FIG. 6.

The heat of fusion (H_f) and the peak melting temperature are reported from the second heat curve. Peak crystallization temperature is determined from the cooling curve.

Dynamic Mechanical Spectroscopy (DMS) Frequency Sweep

Melt rheology, constant temperature frequency sweeps, were performed using a TA Instruments Advanced Rheometric Expansion System (ARES) rheometer equipped with 25 mm parallel plates under a nitrogen purge. Frequency sweeps were performed at 190° C. for all samples at a gap of 2.0 mm and at a constant strain of 10%. The frequency interval was from 0.1 to 100 radians/second. The stress response was analyzed in terms of amplitude and phase, from which the storage modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″), and dynamic melt viscosity (η*) were calculated.

Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)

The GPC system consists of a Waters (Milford, Mass.) 150° C. high temperature chromatograph (other suitable high temperatures GPC instruments include Polymer Laboratories (Shropshire, UK) Model 210 and Model 220) equipped with an on-board differential refractometer (RI). Additional detectors can include an IR4 infra-red detector from Polymer ChAR (Valencia, Spain), Precision Detectors (Amherst, Mass.) 2-angle laser light scattering detector Model 2040, and a Viscotek (Houston, Tex.) 150R 4-capillary solution viscometer. A GPC with the last two independent detectors and at least one of the first detectors is sometimes referred to as “3D-GPC”, while the term “GPC” alone generally refers to conventional GPC. Depending on the sample, either the 15-degree angle or the 90-degree angle of the light scattering detector is used for calculation purposes. Data collection is performed using Viscotek TriSEC software, Version 3, and a 4-channel Viscotek Data Manager DM400. The system is also equipped with an on-line solvent degassing device from Polymer Laboratories (Shropshire, UK). Suitable high temperature GPC columns can be used such as four 30 cm long Shodex HT803 13 micron columns or four 30 cm Polymer Labs columns of 20-micron mixed-pore-size packing (MixA LS, Polymer Labs). The sample carousel compartment is operated at 140° C. and the column compartment is operated at 150° C. The samples are prepared at a concentration of 0.1 grams of polymer in 50 milliliters of solvent. The chromatographic solvent and the sample preparation solvent contain 200 ppm of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). Both solvents are sparged with nitrogen. The polyethylene samples are gently stirred at 160° C. for four hours. The injection volume is 200 microliters. The flow rate through the GPC is set at 1 ml/minute.

The GPC column set is calibrated before running the Examples by running twenty-one narrow molecular weight distribution polystyrene standards. The molecular weight (MW) of the standards ranges from 580 to 8,400,000 grams per mole, and the standards are contained in 6 “cocktail” mixtures. Each standard mixture has at least a decade of separation between individual molecular weights. The standard mixtures are purchased from Polymer Laboratories (Shropshire, UK). The polystyrene standards are prepared at 0.025 g in 50 mL of solvent for molecular weights equal to or greater than 1,000,000 grams per mole and 0.05 g in 50 ml of solvent for molecular weights less than 1,000,000 grams per mole. The polystyrene standards were dissolved at 80° C. with gentle agitation for 30 minutes. The narrow standards mixtures are run first and in order of decreasing highest molecular weight component to minimize degradation. The polystyrene standard peak molecular weights are converted to polyethylene M_wusing the Mark-Houwink K and a (sometimes referred to as α) values mentioned later for polystyrene and polyethylene. See the Examples section for a demonstration of this procedure.

With 3D-GPC, absolute weight average molecular weight (“M_{w, Abs}”) and intrinsic viscosity are also obtained independently from suitable narrow polyethylene standards using the same conditions mentioned previously. These narrow linear polyethylene standards may be obtained from Polymer Laboratories (Shropshire, UK; Part No.'s PL2650-0101 and PL2650-0102).

The systematic approach for the determination of multi-detector offsets is performed in a manner consistent with that published by Balke, Mourey, et al. (Mourey and Balke, Chromatography Polym., Chapter 12, (1992)) (Balke, Thitiratsakul, Lew, Cheung, Mourey, Chromatography Polym., Chapter 13, (1992)), optimizing triple detector log (M_Wand intrinsic viscosity) results from Dow 1683 broad polystyrene (American Polymer Standards Corp.; Mentor, Ohio) or its equivalent to the narrow standard column calibration results from the narrow polystyrene standards calibration curve. The molecular weight data, accounting for detector volume off-set determination, are obtained in a manner consistent with that published by Zimm (Zimm, B. H., J. Chem. Phys., 16, 1099 (1948)) and Kratochvil (Kratochvil, P., Classical Light Scattering from Polymer Solutions, Elsevier, Oxford, N.Y. (1987)). The overall injected concentration used in the determination of the molecular weight is obtained from the mass detector area and the mass detector constant derived from a suitable linear polyethylene homopolymer, or one of the polyethylene standards. The calculated molecular weights are obtained using a light scattering constant derived from one or more of the polyethylene standards mentioned and a refractive index concentration coefficient, dn/dc, of 0.104. Generally, the mass detector response and the light scattering constant should be determined from a linear standard with a molecular weight in excess of about 50,000 daltons. The viscometer calibration can be accomplished using the methods described by the manufacturer or alternatively by using the published values of suitable linear standards such as Standard Reference Materials (SRM) 1475a, 1482a, 1483, or 1484a. The chromatographic concentrations are assumed low enough to eliminate addressing 2^ndviral coefficient effects (concentration effects on molecular weight).

g′ by 3D-GPC

The index (g′) for the sample polymer is determined by first calibrating the light scattering, viscosity, and concentration detectors described in the Gel Permeation Chromatography method supra with SRM 1475a homopolymer polyethylene (or an equivalent reference). The light scattering and viscometer detector offsets are determined relative to the concentration detector as described in the calibration. Baselines are subtracted from the light scattering, viscometer, and concentration chromatograms and integration windows are then set making certain to integrate all of the low molecular weight retention volume range in the light scattering and viscometer chromatograms that indicate the presence of detectable polymer from the refractive index chromatogram. A linear homopolymer polyethylene is used to establish a Mark-Houwink (MH) linear reference line by injecting a broad molecular weight polyethylene reference such as SRM1475a standard, calculating the data file, and recording the intrinsic viscosity (IV) and molecular weight (M_W), each derived from the light scattering and viscosity detectors respectively and the concentration as determined from the RI detector mass constant for each chromatographic slice. For the analysis of samples the procedure for each chromatographic slice is repeated to obtain a sample Mark-Houwink line. Note that for some samples the lower molecular weights, the intrinsic viscosity and the molecular weight data may need to be extrapolated such that the measured molecular weight and intrinsic viscosity asymptotically approach a linear homopolymer GPC calibration curve. To this end, many highly-branched ethylene-based polymer samples require that the linear reference line be shifted slightly to account for the contribution of short chain branching before proceeding with the long chain branching index (g′) calculation.

A g-prime (g_i′) is calculated for each branched sample chromatographic slice (i) and measuring molecular weight (M_i) according to Equation 7, as shown in FIG. 7, where the calculation utilizes the IV_{linear reference,j}at equivalent molecular weight, M_j, in the linear reference sample. In other words, the sample IV slice (i) and reference IV slice (j) have the same molecular weight (M_i=M_j). For simplicity, the IV_{linear reference,j}slices are calculated from a fifth-order polynomial fit of the reference Mark-Houwink Plot. The IV ratio, or g_i′, is only obtained at molecular weights greater than 3,500 because of signal-to-noise limitations in the light scattering data. The number of branches along the sample polymer (B_n) at each data slice (i) can be determined by using Equation 8, as shown in FIG. 8, assuming a viscosity shielding epsilon factor of 0.75.

Finally, the average LCBf quantity per 1000 carbons in the polymer across all of the slices (i) can be determined using Equation 9, as shown in FIG. 9.

gpcBR Branching Index by 3D-GPC

In the 3D-GPC configuration the polyethylene and polystyrene standards can be used to measure the Mark-Houwink constants, K and α, independently for each of the two polymer types, polystyrene and polyethylene. These can be used to refine the Williams and Ward polyethylene equivalent molecular weights in application of the following methods.

The gpcBR branching index is determined by first calibrating the light scattering, viscosity, and concentration detectors as described previously. Baselines are then subtracted from the light scattering, viscometer, and concentration chromatograms. Integration windows are then set to ensure integration of all of the low molecular weight retention volume range in the light scattering and viscometer chromatograms that indicate the presence of detectable polymer from the refractive index chromatogram. Linear polyethylene standards are then used to establish polyethylene and polystyrene Mark-Houwink constants as described previously. Upon obtaining the constants, the two values are used to construct two linear reference conventional calibrations (“cc”) for polyethylene molecular weight and polyethylene intrinsic viscosity as a function of elution volume, as shown in Equations 10 and 11, FIGS. 10 and 11, respectively.

The gpcBR branching index is a robust method for the characterization of long chain branching. See Yau, Wallace W., “Examples of Using 3D-GPC-TREF for Polyolefin Characterization”, Macromol. Symp., 2007, 257, 29-45. The index avoids the slice-by-slice 3D-GPC calculations traditionally used in the determination of g′ values and branching frequency calculations in favor of whole polymer detector areas and area dot products. From 3D-GPC data, one can obtain the sample bulk M_wby the light scattering (LS) detector using the peak area method. The method avoids the slice-by-slice ratio of light scattering detector signal over the concentration detector signal as required in the g′ determination.

The area calculation in Equation 12, shown in FIG. 12, offers more precision because as an overall sample area it is much less sensitive to variation caused by detector noise and GPC settings on baseline and integration limits. More importantly, the peak area calculation is not affected by the detector volume offsets. Similarly, the high-precision sample intrinsic viscosity (IV) is obtained by the area method shown in Equation 13, as shown in FIG. 13, where DP_istands for the differential pressure signal monitored directly from the online viscometer.

To determine the gpcBR branching index, the light scattering elution area for the sample polymer is used to determine the molecular weight of the sample. The viscosity detector elution area for the sample polymer is used to determine the intrinsic viscosity (IV or [η]) of the sample.

Initially, the molecular weight and intrinsic viscosity for a linear polyethylene standard sample, such as SRM1475a or an equivalent, are determined using the conventional calibrations for both molecular weight and intrinsic viscosity as a function of elution volume, per Equations 14 and 15, as shown in FIGS. 14 and 15, respectively.

Equation 16, as shown in FIG. 16, is used to determine the gpcBR branching index, where [η] is the measured intrinsic viscosity, [η]_ccis the intrinsic viscosity from the conventional calibration, M_wis the measured weight average molecular weight, and M_w,ccis the weight average molecular weight of the conventional calibration. The Mw by light scattering (LS) using Equation 12, as shown in FIG. 12, is commonly referred to as the absolute Mw; while the Mw,cc from Equation 14, as shown in FIG. 14, using the conventional GPC molecular weight calibration curve is often referred to as polymer chain Mw. All statistical values with the “cc” subscript are determined using their respective elution volumes, the corresponding conventional calibration as previously described, and the concentration (C_i) derived from the mass detector response. The non-subscripted values are measured values based on the mass detector, LALLS, and viscometer areas. The value of K_PEis adjusted iteratively until the linear reference sample has a gpcBR measured value of zero. For example, the final values for α and Log K for the determination of gpcBR in this particular case are 0.725 and −3.355, respectively, for polyethylene, and 0.722 and −3.993 for polystyrene, respectively.

Once the K and α values have been determined, the procedure is repeated using the branched samples. The branched samples are analyzed using the final Mark-Houwink constants as the best “cc” calibration values and applying Equations 12-16, as shown in FIG. 12-16, respectively.

The interpretation of gpcBR is straight forward. For linear polymers, gpcBR calculated from Equation 16, as shown in FIG. 16, will be close to zero since the values measured by LS and viscometry will be close to the conventional calibration standard. For branched polymers, gpcBR will be higher than zero, especially with high levels of LCB, because the measured polymer M_w, will be higher than the calculated M_w,cc, and the calculated IV_ccwill be higher than the measured polymer Intrinsic Viscosity (IV). In fact, the gpcBR value represents the fractional IV change due the molecular size contraction effect as the result of polymer branching. A gpcBR value of 0.5 or 2.0 would mean a molecular size contraction effect of IV at the level of 50% and 200%, respectively, versus a linear polymer molecule of equivalent weight.

For these particular Examples, the advantage of using gpcBR in comparison to the g′ index and branching frequency calculations is due to the higher precision of gpcBR. All of the parameters used in the gpcBR index determination are obtained with good precision and are not detrimentally affected by the low 3D-GPC detector response at high molecular weight from the concentration detector. Errors in detector volume alignment also do not affect the precision of the gpcBR index determination. In other particular cases, other methods for determining M_w, moments may be preferable to the aforementioned technique.

CEF Method

Comonomer distribution analysis is performed with Crystallization Elution Fractionation (CEF) (PolymerChar in Spain) (B Monrabal et al, Macromol. Symp. 257, 71-79 (2007)). Ortho-dichlorobenzene (ODCB) with 600 ppm antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) is used as solvent. Sample preparation is done with autosampler at 160° C. for 2 hours under shaking at 4 mg/ml (unless otherwise specified). The injection volume is 300 μl. The temperature profile of CEF is: crystallization at 3° C./min from 110° C. to 30° C., the thermal equilibrium at 30° C. for 5 minutes, elution at 3° C./min from 30° C. to 140° C. The flow rate during crystallization is at 0.052 ml/min. The flow rate during elution is at 0.50 ml/min. The data is collected at one data point/second.

CEF column is packed by the Dow Chemical Company with glass beads at 125 μm±6% (MO-SCI Specialty Products) with ⅛ inch stainless tubing. Glass beads are acid washed by MO-SCI Specialty with the request from the Dow Chemical Company. Column volume is 2.06 ml. Column temperature calibration is performed by using a mixture of NIST Standard Reference Material Linear polyethylene 1475a (1.0 mg/ml) and Eicosane (2 mg/ml) in ODCB. Temperature is calibrated by adjusting elution heating rate so that NIST linear polyethylene 1475a has a peak temperature at 101.0° C., and Eicosane has a peak temperature of 30.0° C. The CEF column resolution is calculated with a mixture of NIST linear polyethylene 1475a (1.0 mg/ml) and hexacontane (Fluka, purum, ≧97.0%, 1 mg/ml). A baseline separation of hexacontane and NIST polyethylene 1475a is achieved. The area of hexacontane (from 35.0 to 67.0° C.) to the area of NIST 1475a from 67.0 to 110.0° C. is 50 to 50, the amount of soluble fraction below 35.0° C. is <1.8 wt %. The CEF column resolution is defined in equation 17, as shown in FIG. 17, where the column resolution is 6.0.

CDC Method

Comonomer distribution constant (CDC) is calculated from comonomer distribution profile by CEF. CDC is defined as Comonomer Distribution Index divided by Comonomer Distribution Shape Factor multiplying by 100 as shown in Equation 1, FIG. 1.

Comonomer distribution index stands for the total weight fraction of polymer chains with the comonomer content ranging from 0.5 of median comonomer content (C_median) and 1.5 of C_medianfrom 35.0 to 119.0° C. Comonomer Distribution Shape Factor is defined as a ratio of the half width of comonomer distribution profile divided by the standard deviation of comonomer distribution profile from the peak temperature (T_p).

CDC is calculated from comonomer distribution profile by CEF, and CDC is defined as Comonomer Distribution Index divided by Comonomer Distribution Shape Factor multiplying by 100 as shown in Equation 1, FIG. 1, and wherein Comonomer distribution index stands for the total weight fraction of polymer chains with the comonomer content ranging from 0.5 of median comonomer content (C_median) and 1.5 of C_medianfrom 35.0 to 119.0° C., and wherein Comonomer Distribution Shape Factor is defined as a ratio of the half width of comonomer distribution profile divided by the standard deviation of comonomer distribution profile from the peak temperature (Tp).

CDC is calculated according to the following steps:

(A) Obtain a weight fraction at each temperature (T) (w_T(T)) from 35.0° C. to 119.0° C. with a temperature step increase of 0.200° C. from CEF according to Equation 2, as shown in FIG. 2;

(B) Calculate the median temperature (T_median) at cumulative weight fraction of 0.500, according to Equation 3, as shown in FIG. 3;

(H) Calculate the standard deviation of temperature (Stdev) according Equation 5, as shown in FIG. 5.

Creep Zero Shear Viscosity Measurement Method:

Zero-shear viscosities are obtained via creep tests that were conducted on an AR-G2 stress controlled rheometer (TA Instruments; New Castle, Del.) using 25-mm-diameter parallel plates at 190° C. The rheometer oven is set to test temperature for at least 30 minutes prior to zeroing fixtures. At the testing temperature a compression molded sample disk is inserted between the plates and allowed to come to equilibrium for 5 minutes. The upper plate is then lowered down to 50 μm above the desired testing gap (1.5 mm) Any superfluous material is trimmed off and the upper plate is lowered to the desired gap. Measurements are done under nitrogen purging at a flow rate of 5 L/min Default creep time is set for 2 hours.

A constant low shear stress of 20 Pa is applied for all of the samples to ensure that the steady state shear rate is low enough to be in the Newtonian region. The resulting steady state shear rates are in the range of 10⁻³to 10⁻⁴s⁻¹for the samples in this study. Steady state is determined by taking a linear regression for all the data in the last 10% time window of the plot of log(J(t)) vs. log(t), where J(t) is creep compliance and t is creep time. If the slope of the linear regression is greater than 0.97, steady state is considered to be reached, then the creep test is stopped. In all cases in this study the slope meets the criterion within 2 hours. The steady state shear rate is determined from the slope of the linear regression of all of the data points in the last 10% time window of the plot of ε vs. t, where ε is strain. The zero-shear viscosity is determined from the ratio of the applied stress to the steady state shear rate.

In order to determine if the sample is degraded during the creep test, a small amplitude oscillatory shear test is conducted before and after the creep test on the same specimen from 0.1 to 100 rad/s. The complex viscosity values of the two tests are compared. If the difference of the viscosity values at 0.1 rad/s is greater than 5%, the sample is considered to have degraded during the creep test, and the result is discarded.

Zero-shear viscosity ratio (ZSVR) is defined as the ratio of the zero-shear viscosity (ZSV) of the branched polyethylene material to the ZSV of the linear polyethylene material at the equivalent weight average molecular weight (Mw-gpc) as shown in the Equation 18, as shown in FIG. 18.

The ZSV value is obtained from creep test at 190° C. via the method described above. The Mw-gpc value is determined by the conventional GPC method. The correlation between ZSV of linear polyethylene and its Mw-gpc was established based on a series of linear polyethylene reference materials. A description for the ZSV-Mw relationship can be found in the ANTEC proceeding: Kari ala, Teresa P.; Sammler, Robert L.; Mangnus, Marc A.; Hazlitt, Lonnie G.; Johnson, Mark S.; Hagen, Charles M., Jr.; Huang, Joe W. L.; Reichek, Kenneth N. Detection of low levels of long-chain branching in polyolefins. Annual Technical Conference—Society of Plastics Engineers (2008), 66th 887-891.

¹H NMR Method

3.26 g of stock solution is added to 0.133 g of polyolefin sample in 10 mm NMR tube. The stock solution is a mixture of tetrachloroethane-d₂(TCE) and perchloroethylene (50:50, w:w) with 0.001M Cr³⁺. The solution in the tube is purged with N₂for 5 minutes to reduce the amount of oxygen. The capped sample tube is left at room temperature overnight to swell the polymer sample. The sample is dissolved at 110° C. with shaking. The samples are free of the additives that may contribute to unsaturation, e.g. slip agents such as erucamide.

The ¹H NMR are run with a 10 mm cryoprobe at 120° C. on Bruker AVANCE 400 MHz spectrometer.

Two experiments are run to get the unsaturation: the control and the double presaturation experiments.

For the control experiment, the data is processed with exponential window function with LB=1 Hz, baseline was corrected from 7 to −2 ppm. The signal from residual ¹H of TCE is set to 100, the integral I_totalfrom −0.5 to 3 ppm is used as the signal from whole polymer in the control experiment. The number of CH₂group, NCH₂, in the polymer is calculated as following:

NCH₂=I_total/2

For the double presaturation experiment, the data is processed with exponential window function with LB=1 Hz, baseline was corrected from 6.6 to 4.5 ppm. The signal from residual ₁H of TCE is set to 100, the corresponding integrals for unsaturations (I_vinylene, I_vinyland I_vinylidene) were integrated based on the region shown in FIG. 2. The number of unsaturation unit for vinylene, trisubstituted, vinyl and vinylidene are calculated:

N_vinylene=I_vinylene/2
N_{trisubstituted}=I_{trisubstitute}
N_vinyl=I_vinyl/2
N_vinylidene=I_vinylidene/2

The unsaturation unit/1,000,000 carbons is calculated as following:

N_vinylene/1,000,000C=(N_vinylene/NCH₂)*1,000,000
N_{trisubstituted}/1,000,000C=(N_{trisubstituted}/NCH₂)*1,000,000
N_vinyl/1,000,000C=(N_vinyl/NCH₂)*1,000,000
N_vinylidene/1,000,000C=(N_vinylidene/NCH₂)*1,000,000

The requirement for unsaturation NMR analysis includes: level of quantitation is 0.47±0.02/1,000,000 carbons for Vd2 with 200 scans (less than 1 hour data acquisition including time to run the control experiment) with 3.9 wt % of sample (for Vd2 structure, see Macromolecules, vol. 38, 6988, 2005), 10 mm high temperature cryoprobe. The level of quantitation is defined as signal to noise ratio of 10.

The chemical shift reference is set at 6.0 ppm for the ¹H signal from residual proton from TCT-d2. The control is run with ZG pulse, TD 32768, NS 4, DS 12, SWH 10,000 Hz, AQ 1.64s, D1 14s. The double presaturation experiment is run with a modified pulse sequence, O1P 1.354 ppm, O2P 0.960 ppm, PL9 57 db, PL21 70 db, TD 32768, NS 200, DS 4, SWH 10,000 Hz, AQ 1.64s, D1 1 s, D13 13s. The modified pulse sequences for unsaturation with Bruker AVANCE 400 MHz spectrometer are shown in FIG. 21.

Gel Content

Gel content is determined in accordance to ASTM D-2765-01 Method A in xylene. The sample is cut to required size using a razor blade.

Film Testing Conditions

The following physical properties are measured on the films produced:

- Total (Overall), Surface and Internal Haze: Samples measured for internal haze and overall haze are sampled and prepared according to ASTM D-1003. Internal haze was obtained via refractive index matching using mineral oil on both sides of the films. A Hazegard Plus (BYK-Gardner USA; Columbia, Md.) is used for testing. Surface haze is determined as the difference between overall haze and internal haze (Haze=Internal Haze+Surface Haze). Surface haze tends to be related to the surface roughness of the film, where surface increases with increasing surface roughness. The surface haze to internal haze ratio is the surface haze value divided by the internal haze value (S/I=Surface Haze/Internal Haze);
- 45° Gloss: ASTM D-2457;
- MD and CD Elmendorf Tear Strength: ASTM D-1922. The reported data is normalized with respect to the film thickness in mil;
- MD and CD Tensile Strength: ASTM D-882;
- Dart Impact Strength: ASTM D-1709; and
- Puncture Strength: Puncture is measured on a Instron Model 4201 with Sintech Testworks Software Version 3.10. The specimen size is 6″×6″ and 4 measurements are made to determine an average puncture value. The film is conditioned for 40 hours after film production and at least 24 hours in an ASTM controlled laboratory. A 100 lb load cell is used with a round specimen holder 12.56″ square. The puncture probe is a ½″ diameter polished stainless steel ball with a 7.5″ maximum travel length. There is no gauge length; the probe is as close as possible to, but not touching, the specimen. The crosshead speed used is 10″/minute. The thickness is measured in the middle of the specimen. The thickness of the film, the distance the crosshead traveled, and the peak load are used to determine the puncture by the software. The puncture probe is cleaned using a “Kim-wipe” after each specimen.

Unless otherwise stated, implicit from the context or conventional in the art, all parts and percentages are based on weight.

All applications, publications, patents, test procedures, and other documents cited, including priority documents, are fully incorporated by reference to the extent such disclosure is not inconsistent with the disclosed compositions and methods and for all jurisdictions in which such incorporation is permitted.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
3485706	Evans	Dec 1969	A
4322027	Reba	Mar 1982	A
4340563	Appel et al.	Jul 1982	A
4413110	Kavesh et al.	Nov 1983	A
4663220	Wisneski et al.	May 1987	A
4668566	Braun	May 1987	A
5844045	Kolthammer et al.	Dec 1998	A
5869575	Kolthammer et al.	Feb 1999	A
5977251	Kao et al.	Nov 1999	A
6420507	Kale et al.	Jul 2002	B1
6448341	Kolthammer et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6538070	Cardwell et al.	Mar 2003	B1
6545088	Kolthammer et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6566446	Parikh et al.	May 2003	B1
7534847	Mihan et al.	May 2009	B2
7951873	Best et al.	May 2011	B2
8058373	Stevens et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8101696	Konze et al.	Jan 2012	B2
8450438	Aboelella et al.	May 2013	B2
20010016632	Sipos	Aug 2001	A1
20040010103	Boussie et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20050254731	Berbert et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20100311927	Karjala et al.	Dec 2010	A1

Number	Date	Country
2006081116	Aug 2006	WO
2007008753	Jan 2007	WO
2007035492	Mar 2007	WO
2007136493	Nov 2007	WO
2007136506	Nov 2007	WO
WO 2007136495	Nov 2007	WO
WO 2007136496	Nov 2007	WO
WO2007136496	Nov 2007	WO
2009067337	May 2009	WO
2011002868	Jan 2011	WO
2011002998	Jan 2011	WO

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	12827222	Jun 2010	US
Child	13714622		US

Ethylene-based polymer compositions

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

US Referenced Citations (23)

Foreign Referenced Citations (11)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)

Related Publications (1)

Provisional Applications (1)

Divisions (1)

Entry
IPRP from corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/040575. Dated Mar. 26, 2013.
ISA from corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/040575. Dated Sep. 27, 2011.
EP Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2013; from EP counterpart Application No. 10 729 769.9.
CN Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2013; from CN counterpart Application No. 201080038998.4.
CN Response dated Jul. 15, 2013; from CN counterpart Application No. 201080038998.4.
EP Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2013; from EP counterpart Application No. 10729769.9.
Instructions to EP Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2013; from EP counterpart Application No. 10729769.9.
Instructions to Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2013; from Chinese counterpart Application No. 201080038998.4.
Chinese Response to Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2013; from Chinese counterpart Application No. 201080038998.4.
EP Response to Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2013; from EP counterpart Application No. 10 729 769.9.
JP Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2013; from JP counterpart Application No. 2012-517887.