Patent Application
20210219634
This invention relates to an evaporative cooling garment having collapsible sun and wind shading elements.
As heatwaves become more frequent and intense, personal cooling becomes increasingly important for maintaining outdoor activities and for individuals without access to air conditioning. For about one-third of the current global population living in drylands, evaporating water from clothing is the simplest, safest, most cost-effective, and lightest weight method of augmenting natural thermoregulation. To cool off, one can simply wear a water-soaked cotton shirt or a highly water-absorbing commercial cooling garment. However, of the stored water, the vast majority is wasted if such apparel is exposed to solar radiation or even slow air flow.
This disclosure relates to an evaporative cooling garment having collapsible sun and wind shading elements over a surface of the garment. Geometrical and radiative properties of the shading elements are described. For a wearer who is not moving and in stagnant conditions, cooling and the water usage efficiency are optimized by introducing a ventilation gap between the garment surface and the shading elements. In contrast, for a wearer who is moving or exposed to wind, such a gap can result in excessive evaporation rates that are dependent on the wind speed. A perforated reflective second layer with a collapsible ventilation gap can provide a moderate cooling rate that is nearly independent of sun and wind effects. For a high wearer exertion rate, the evaporative garment can also provide a higher cooling rate by maintaining the gap. The evaporative cooling garment can help reduce the weight of a garment, increase its length of cooling, or both.
In a general aspect, an evaporative cooling garment includes a first layer and a second layer superimposed over the first layer. The first layer is configured to absorb a quantity of water, and the second layer includes a reflective material and defines openings. The first layer is visible from an exterior of the garment through the openings in the second layer, and the garment defines a collapsible gap between an inner surface of the second layer and an outer surface of the first layer.
Implementations of the general aspect may include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, the openings in the second layer include about 10% to about 50% of the surface area defined by a perimeter of the second layer. The openings can be rectangular or circular. The collapsible gap, when not collapsed, is typically in a range between about 0.1 cm and about 2 cm. When the collapsible gap is collapsed, the inner surface of the second layer and the outer surface of the first layer are in direct contact.
In some implementations, the first layer is a composite material. In one example, the first layer includes a superabsorbent polymer. The first layer can include a multiplicity of layers. In some implementations, the first layer has a thickness between about 0.1 cm and about 1.5 cm. In certain implementations, the second layer has a thickness between about 0.1 cm and 1 cm. The second layer typically has a reflectivity of about 0.8 to 1 in the visible, near-infrared, and far-infrared regions.
The garment can be configured to cover at least a portion of a wearer's torso. In some implementations, the garment is a vest or a shirt. The garment can be configured to cover a portion of a wearer's leg. In certain implementations, the garment is a pair of pants. The garment can be a head covering (e.g., a hat).
Some implementations include flaps coupled to the second layer. The flaps are configured to cover all or a portion of the openings. The flaps are typically configured to move relative to the second layer, thereby exposing the openings. In some cases, the flaps cover a majority of the surface of the second layer.
The details of one or more embodiments of the subject matter of this disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
Exposure of personal cooling garments that rely on evaporation of stored water to sun and/or to even mild air flow dramatically degrades or even negates their cooling capabilities and increases required water use. These effects can be quantified by comparing the performance of a garment that is either shaded from or exposed to sun in various wind speeds using a one-dimensional (1D) resistive network model.
Demonstrating that air flow is detrimental to effective water use, with hc greater than about 10 Wm−2C−1, the wearer experiences cooling equivalent to evaporation of only one-third to half of the used water, even without exposure to the sun. In other terms, out of 1 kgm−2hr−1 of used water, the wearer experiences a cooling equivalent to the evaporation of only 0.33-0.5 kgm−2 hr−1 (i.e., water use efficiency η=q″body/q″eva of 0.3 to 0.5). If the garment is also exposed to solar radiation, q″body decreases markedly despite a significant increase in q″eva. Moreover, in natural convection conditions (hc below 5 Wm−2° C.−1) the garment wearer is substantially heated (q″body of −100 to −200 Wm−2) despite nearly doubling of the evaporation flux over the sun-shaded case (q″eva increases from 250 to 450 Wm−2). With a higher air flow, the wearer experiences a moderate level of cooling (i.e., 50 to 100 Wm−2), but at the expense of a very low η of around 0.2. In some implementations, one or more of these issues can be mitigated by providing the evaporative cooling garment with collapsible perforated reflective sun and wind shading elements.
Evaporative cooling garments described in this disclosure include a water-absorbing first layer and a reflective second layer defining through openings and superimposed over the first layer. The first and second layers are arranged to allow air to flow between the first and second layer under certain conditions. The second layer can be fixed or removably coupled to the first layer at a multiplicity of attachment locations. A “fixed” second layer is sewn or laminated to the first layer at a multiplicity of attachment locations. A “removably coupled” second layer can be coupled to the first layer with fasteners (e.g., snaps, ties, hook-and-loop fasteners).
In some implementations, the first layer includes one or more woven or non-woven natural or synthetic polymer layers selected to hold water in the fibers, between fibers, or in other matrix formats. In one implementation, the first layer includes a suberabsorbent polymer between two woven or non-woven natural or synthetic polymer layers. Superabsorbent polymers can soak up an order of magnitude more water than other fabrics. A thickness of the first layer can be in a range between about 0.1 cm and about 1.5 cm. Due at least in part to the protection provided by the second layer, the first layer can have a range of radiative properties.
The second layer can include a material that is highly reflective (reflectivity of 0.8 to 1) in the visible and near and far infrared regions. Such materials can include, but are not limited to, a variety of metalized films and fabrics (e.g. radiative MYLAR “blanket”), nano-engineered fabrics, or a combination of such. A thickness of the second layer is typically in a range between about 25 μm (e.g., MYLAR) to about 2 mm or 3 mm (e.g., for a thick reflective fabric). Openings in the second layer correspond to about 10% to about 50% of the area of the second layer. The openings typically have at least one dimension (e.g., a radius, width, length, thickness, or height) of about 0.1 cm to about 2 cm. In some cases, a dimension of each of the openings is comparable to the thickness of the second layer (e.g., circular openings having a diameter of 1 mm in a 1 mm thick second layer). Such a geometry can effectively block a majority of direct solar radiation (assumed to be incident at a moderately high angle corresponding to sunny mid-day conditions).
The second layer is coupled (e.g., removably coupled) proximate the first layer. The evaporative cooling garment is configured such that some or all of the second layer can be in direct contact with the first layer or spaced apart from the first layer to create a ventilation gap between the first layer and the second layer, thereby allowing air to circulate between the first layer and the second layer through the ventilation gap. A dimension of the ventilation gap (e.g., a linear distance between an outer surface of the first layer and an inner surface of the second layer) is typically in a range of about 0.5 cm to about 2 cm, or about 1.5 cm.
In some implementations, an evaporative cooling garment can be configured to cover the back and the chest of a wearer. In some implementations, an evaporative cooling garment can be configured to the neck, head, legs, thighs, or any combination thereof of a wearer.
A multiphysics model can be used to quantify performance of garments covered by louver and slitted second layers that can be thought of as horizontal ruffles and slashes. This model couples conductive, convective, evaporative, and radiative heat transfer with mass transport in natural or forced laminar flow. In the case of natural convection, the model accounts for air buoyancy induced by both temperature and water vapor concentration, which in conditions of interest have a competing effect that can induce flow reversal. Under natural convection conditions, the body cooling and water use efficiency are optimized by introducing a ventilation gap (e.g., 0.5 cm to 2 cm, or about 1.5 cm) between the first layer and the second layer. In forced convection conditions, however, such a gap results in an excessive and highly wind-speed dependent evaporation rate. Based on these results, a slitted second layer design with a collapsible ventilation gap that can provide a nearly sun and wind independent moderate cooling rate. In particular, if the gap is collapsed, the second layer reduces the excessive evaporative rate induced by air motion by reducing the evaporation area. For a high wearer exertion rate, a higher cooling rate can be achieved by maintaining the ventilation gap (e.g., by selecting a material or attachment of the second layer accordingly).
If the wearer is exposed to very low air movement with speed below 0.25 m/s (i.e., the person is stationary, moving slowly, and wind speed is very low), a ventilation gap or spacing can exist between surface of the garment and the inner side of the shading structure. In order to enable development of a moist air flow natural boundary layer, the thickness of this gap is typically at least 1 cm or more. The gap does not necessarily have to be this thick over the entire surface of the garment (e.g., attachment points can be present). In quantitative terms, with a ventilation gap of 1.5 cm, a body cooling flux of 80 to 85 Wm−2 with an evaporation flux of 145 to 160 Wm−2 (water efficiency use of 0.5 to 0.6) can be obtained with use of a second layer having a thickness of about 1 mm with 100 slits. These values typically do not change much as the number of slits increases from 25 to 100, but can degrade when the number of slits increases to 200. When the openings correspond to about half of the area of the second layer, the degradation of the cooling performance can be due at least in part to higher exposure to far infrared radiation from the environment. For similar reasons, increasing a height of the openings can also degrade the cooling performance of the garment.
If the garment with a perforated second layer (e.g., as in
In one example, for a garment with a first layer, a second layer, and a ventilation gap of about 15 mm, q″body increases from 100 Wm−2 to 200 Wm−2 and q″eva increases from around 200 to 350 Wm−2 when air speed increases from 0.25 to 1 ms−1. For a greater air velocity, the body cooling flux saturates around 250 Wm−2 to 300 Wm−2 while the evaporative flux continues to increase up to around 700 Wm−2 with an air speed of 5 ms−1. Consequently, the second layer are quite effective in blocking solar radiation because the simulated values are comparable to that obtained for a garment without any shading structures that are not exposed to solar radiation.
If the increase in air flow impacting the garment is caused by movement of the wearer, the increase in the body cooling and evaporative fluxes is likely desirable and needed to compensate for the increased metabolic heat generation. However, if the wearer is more or less stationary and exposed to wind, the additional cooling and associated large water use are likely unnecessary. As such, in response to increased speed of the air moving against the garment, the ventilation gap can collapse. In one example, the mechanism of collapse is aerodynamic. This could include external air flow collapsing a natural fold or inducing a local stretch in the second layer and pressing it against the garment. In other examples, the collapse mechanism includes a switch (e.g., a mechanical switch). In either case, the primary purpose of pressing the second layer against the first layer is to reduce the wet area available for evaporation. The level of this reduction is directly proportional to the resulting heat flux. Adjusting the number of slits between 50 and 100 enables (or open area of 12.5 to 25% of the first layer) marked decrease of q″eva values while maintaining moderate values of q″body. In particular, for a second layer with 50 slits and wind speeds increasing from 1.5 to 5 ms−1, q″body will increase from 77.5 to 95 Wm−2 while q″eva will increase from 160 to 230 Wm−2 (η decreases from 0.48 to 0.41). In turn, increasing to 100 slits at the same wind speeds, q″body increases from 120 to 150 Wm−2 while q″eva increases from 245 to 345 Wm−2 (η decreases from 0.49 to 0.43).
Altogether, simulation results indicate that an evaporative garment covered by a highly reflective second layer with about 10% open area and a ventilation gap of around 15 mm that collapses when exposed to air flow can provide the wearer with nearly sun and wind independent cooling flux between 80 to 95 Wm−2 with an evaporation flux between 160 to 230 Wm−2. If the wearer desires a moderately higher cooling flux, increasing the open area to 25% enables increase in q″body from 75 to 150 Wm−2, but at a cost of a higher q″eva from 175 to 345 Wm−2 (values represent range from natural convection to forced convection with air speed of 5 ms−1). In forced convection conditions, doubling the number of slits results in, albeit more wind-speed dependent, 50% increase in the wearer cooling as well as evaporative flux. In all these scenarios, a moderate η of 0.4 to 0.5 is achieved. This again highlights that both of these second layers provide a performance improvement over an unshaded garment that is exposed to sun. To reinforce this point, in stagnant and sunny condition, a wearer of a garment without a second layer experiences a heating flux of about 100 Wm−2 despite an evaporation flux of over 300 Wm−2. The wearer can experience cooling if exposed to air movement but at a cost of a dramatically increased water consumption rate (e.g., at 1.5 ms−1 and 5ms−1 q″body is 70 and 200 Wm−2 while q″eva is 650 and 920 Wm−2 (thus η of 0.1 to 0.2)). That is, to achieve the q″eva of 650 and 920 Wm−2, a garment without a second layer would need to store 1 to 1.4 kgm−2 to provide an hour of cooling in the sun. By introducing the collapsible slitted second layers, the mass of the stored water required to provide comparable cooling flux for one hour can be reduced to 0.25 to 0.35 kgm−2 for a second layer with 10% open area and 0.25 to 0.5 kgm−2 for a second layer with 25% open area. Consequently, the garment with rationally designed, reflective slitted second layers can either be much lighter or provide cooling for significantly extended period of time, nearly independent of sun and wind exposure.
Although this disclosure contains many specific embodiment details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the subject matter or on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this disclosure in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented, in combination, in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments, separately, or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although previously described features may be described as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.
Particular embodiments of the subject matter have been described. Other embodiments, alterations, and permutations of the described embodiments are within the scope of the following claims as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. While operations are depicted in the drawings or claims in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed (some operations may be considered optional), to achieve desirable results.
Accordingly, the previously described example embodiments do not define or constrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/962,503 entitled “EVAPORATIVE COOLING GARMENT” and filed on Jan. 17, 2020, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62962503 | Jan 2020 | US |
