The present disclosure relates generally to filters, and more particularly to filters useful for adsorbing hydrocarbon vapors.
In internal combustion engines, while the engine is running, there is a constant flow of air through the air induction system into the intake manifold and finally into the combustion chamber through the intake valves. The airflow is caused by the intake stroke of the piston, which draws a vacuum on the intake manifold. This creates an imbalance of pressures between the intake manifold and the environment, and thus air rushes in through the air induction system. Due to the low internal pressure in the intake manifold and the constant airflow into the engine, there are no evaporative emissions from the intake manifold or air induction system.
Further, when a modern, fuel injected engine is running, the fuel system maintains the fuel in the fuel rail(s) at sufficient pressure to prevent the vaporization of the fuel even though the fuel rail(s) may be at a temperature sufficient to vaporize the fuel at normal atmospheric pressure. In fact, good restarting in part may depend on maintaining fuel rail pressure for a number of hours after shut down until the engine cools to prevent fuel vaporization in the fuel rail(s). Fuel vapor in the fuel rail(s) is generally undesirable in that it may lead to long crank times during engine start up.
After engine shut-down, air continues to rush through the air induction system until the intake manifold vacuum is eliminated. Evaporative hydrocarbons may be emitted if the pressurized fuel in the fuel rail(s) leaks into the intake manifold through the fuel injectors. This small amount of fuel may vaporize, and the hydrocarbon vapor may migrate out of the intake manifold through the air induction system to the atmosphere. Heretofore such hydrocarbon vapor egress was considered negligible. However, current regulations in the state of California, as well as in other U.S. states, restrict evaporative emissions from fuel to virtually zero.
Attempts to solve the problem of evaporative hydrocarbon emissions have included placing secondary, hydrocarbon adsorbing filters within the direct air flow path. However, such filters generally add restriction to the air induction system. As such, the engine is generally less efficient, or the air induction system may need to be sized larger in order to provide the same mass airflow with the increased restriction.
Other attempts have included combining hydrocarbon vapor-adsorbing materials with a standard particulate/contaminant air filter. Some drawbacks associated with these combination filters include the possibility of vapor-adsorbing material flaking out of the filter and entering the air system. The loss of adsorbent material may deleteriously affect the vapor adsorbence of the filter.
An evaporative emissions filter is disclosed for an engine air induction system. The evaporative emissions filter includes a hydrocarbon vapor-adsorbent member disposed within the air induction system outside the direct air flow path. A mechanism is provided for mounting the evaporative emissions filter within the air induction system. Hydrocarbon vapors present in the air induction system after engine shut-down are substantially retained in the adsorbent member until air flows through the air induction system after the engine starts.
Objects, features and advantages will become apparent by reference to the following detailed description and drawings, in which like reference numerals correspond to similar, though not necessarily identical components. For the sake of brevity, reference numerals having a previously described function may not necessarily be described in connection with subsequent drawings in which they appear.
It would be desirable to substantially prevent evaporative hydrocarbon emissions from escaping into the atmosphere in order to meet regulations and to become more environmentally friendly. It would further be desirable to achieve such substantial prevention without restricting airflow through the air induction system. Yet further, it would be desirable to achieve this goal relatively inexpensively. It would further be desirable to achieve this goal with a lower likelihood of fouling the adsorbent material compared to a barrier filter.
The evaporative emissions filter of the present disclosure substantially meets the above-mentioned desiderata. The present inventors have unexpectedly and fortuitously also discovered an adsorptive filter/member and method of making and using the same (described further hereinbelow in conjunction with
Referring now to
Referring also to
The evaporative emissions filter 10 comprises a hydrocarbon vapor-adsorbent member 22 disposed within the air induction system 12 substantially outside of the direct air flow path P. Evaporative emissions filter 10 may further include a mechanism 24 for mounting the evaporative emissions filter 10 within the air induction system 12. It is to be understood that mechanism 24 may include any suitable fasteners, including but not limited to adhesives, hook and loop fasteners, screws, rivets, fasteners that employ ultrasonic or friction welding, flexible tabs that snap the filter 10 in, and the like. Further, the evaporative emissions filter 10 may be mounted to the airbox 14 in such a way that it is mounted off the flat surface (stand-offs) in order to maximize the amount of the adsorbent member 22 exposed to the evaporative emissions (a non-limitative example of such an embodiment is shown in
If hydrocarbon vapors are present in the air induction system after engine shut-down, the vapors are substantially retained in the adsorbent member 22 until air flows through the air induction system 12 after the engine starts. The return of air flow through the system 12 substantially regenerates the adsorbent member 22.
It is to be understood that evaporative emissions filter 10 of the present disclosure may be placed in any suitable area of the induction system 12 substantially outside of the direct flow path P. In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the filter 10 is mounted within the air resonator 20 and/or the air filter housing 14.
In an alternative exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the filter 10 is mounted within the air resonator 20 (as seen in
In a further embodiment of the present disclosure, the filter 10 is mounted within the air filter housing 14 on the clean air side C of the housing 14.
In yet a further embodiment of the present disclosure, the filter 10 is mounted within the air filter housing 14 on the dirty air side D of the housing 14 (as seen in
Still further, in an embodiment of the present disclosure, one evaporative emissions filter 10 is mounted within the air filter housing 14 on the clean air side C of the housing 14, and a second filter 10 (a second, third and fourth filter 10 is shown in phantom in
As shown in
It is to be understood that the adsorbent member 22 may include any suitable hydrocarbon vapor-adsorbing material. In an embodiment of the present disclosure, examples of the hydrocarbon vapor-adsorbing material include, but are not limited to at least one of activated carbon, zeolites, cyclodextrins, hydrophobic cellulose, liquid phase absorbents (e.g. silicon oils), and/or mixtures thereof In a non-limitative embodiment of the present disclosure, the adsorbent member 22 has as a main component thereof activated carbon. It is to be further understood that the hydrocarbon vapor-adsorbing material may be in any suitable form and housed/impregnated within any suitable media.
In an embodiment, the hydrocarbon-vapor adsorbing material may be contained by one or more fine mesh screens. It is to be understood that the fine mesh screen(s) may be formed from any suitable materials, including but not limited to polymeric materials, metal materials, and/or mixtures thereof. One non-limitative example of a suitable polymeric material is polyvinylidene chloride, commercially available from Dow Chemical in Midland, Mich. under the tradename SARAN.
Some non-limitative examples of carbon impregnated filtration structures are commercially available from AQF Technologies LLC in Charlotte, N.C. Other suitable non-limitative examples of adsorbent media are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,486,410, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The '410 patent discloses, among other embodiments, a filtration structure of a composite staple having a nylon sheath and a polyester core, with activated carbon particles bonded to the fiber matrix, and including a microfiber web located within the structure. Yet other suitable adsorbent media include activated carbon commercially available from PICA USA, Inc. in Columbus, Ohio.
It is further believed that wood based carbon may provide certain advantages, such as for example, in regeneration of the carbon bed.
In order to extend the life of the hydrocarbon vapor-adsorbent member 22, in some instances it may be desirable to protect evaporative emissions filter 10 with an optional protective member(s) such as a hinged flapper 26, louvres 28, a combination thereof, and/or the like. The flapper 26 and louvres 28 are each shown semi-schematically and in phantom in
Even without a separate protecting member 26, 28, the location of the present disclosure 10 outside of the direct flow path P, i.e. in a lower flow area, such as for example, in the airbox 14 or resonator 20, results in less stress and less contamination of the adsorbent member 22 (compared to a barrier filter), thus leading to longer life of the evaporative emissions filter 10.
A method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure for adsorbing hydrocarbon vapors from an automotive engine air induction system 12 after engine shut-down, includes the step of operatively placing the evaporative emissions filter 10 substantially outside of the direct air flow path P and within at least one of the air resonator 20 and the air filter housing 14, the evaporative emissions filter 10 including hydrocarbon vapor-adsorbent member 22. Hydrocarbon vapors present in the air induction system 12 after engine shut-down are substantially retained in the adsorbent member 22 until air flows through the air induction system 12 after the engine starts.
Due at least in part to Brownian movement of the hydrocarbon molecules (e.g., random movement of the molecules and collisions with each other and the housing) as well as temperature differences and the confined space of the housing, the hydrocarbon molecules do not travel in the same direction and thus, the evaporative emissions filter 10 of the present disclosure is not required to be a barrier type device (i.e., a device through which the air must pass through). By disposing the evaporative emissions filter 10 substantially outside the direct air flow path and/or substantially outside an air inlet path, the same 10 is not required to be integrated with the air filter 16. As such, the evaporative emissions filter 10 does not decrease the flow rate of the air induction system 12 (as would a barrier type device). Thus, placing the evaporative emissions filter 10 substantially outside of the direct air flow path is particularly advantageous and does not adversely affect the performance of the air induction system 12. In addition, and since the evaporative emissions filter 10 is not a barrier type element and merely adsorbs hydrocarbons during engine shut down and releases them into the air inlet path during engine operation, the evaporative emissions filter 10 does not become fouled. As such, filter 10 does not need replacement and therefore may be permanently secured to the air induction system 12.
To further illustrate the present disclosure, the following examples are given. It is to be understood that these examples are provided for illustrative purposes and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the present disclosure.
In alternate trials, A) 36 grams of activated carbon impregnated filter media obtained from AQF Technologies LLC were placed on the top inner surface (clean side) of airbox 14; B) 12 grams of the AQF activated carbon were placed on each of three inner sides of airbox 14: top, and opposed sides of the clean side (similar to a saddle) for a total of 36 grams of activated carbon; C) 36 grams of activated carbon obtained from PICA USA, Inc. and held between two layers of a fine mesh screen were placed on the top inner surface (clean side) of airbox 14; and D) 18 grams of the AQF activated carbon were placed on the top inner surface (clean side) and on the bottom inner surface (dirty side) of the airbox 14, for a total of 36 grams of activated carbon. In each of the alternate trials, 1.5 grams of gasoline vapor were allowed to enter the air induction system 12. In each of the four trials, less than about 0.006 grams of hydrocarbon vapor was emitted to the atmosphere, as compared to the control (no adsorbent media) in which almost 0.04 grams of hydrocarbon vapor was emitted to the atmosphere. Of the four trials, it appeared that trial D was more successful in preventing escape of evaporative hydrocarbon emissions.
The present disclosure is further advantageous in that an effective amount of adsorbent media/member 22 may be calculated for an expected amount of hydrocarbon vapor. As such, that effective amount of adsorbent member 22 may be placed within the air induction system 12 to adsorb that expected amount of hydrocarbon vapor.
Referring now to
In another alternative exemplary embodiment, the adsorptive filter/member includes an intermediate layer that substantially adds rigidity to the filter.
Further, embodiments of the adsorptive filter/member may advantageously have sufficient flexibility to ease installation of the filter while maintaining sufficient rigidity to substantially obviate the need for a screen mesh and/or frame-like member. This may advantageously reduce the need for additional materials, and thus may result in a decrease in filter weight, as well as a decrease in manufacturing time and/or cost.
Referring now to
Specifically referring to
Generally, the porous polymeric materials for the first and second layers 30, 34 are configured to have a pore size/mesh size large enough to allow the desired adsorbate to pass through, yet small enough to prevent the adsorptive media from passing through. In an embodiment, the porous polymeric materials' pore size may range, for example, between about 1 μm and about 2000 μm. In a further embodiment when an adsorptive media having a relatively large average particle size is used (e.g. carbon pellets), the porous polymeric materials' pore size may range, for example, between about 200 μm and about 2000 μm. In yet a further embodiment in which an adsorptive media having a smaller average particle size is used (e.g. granular carbon), the porous polymeric materials' pore size may range, for example, between about 100 μm and about 200 μm. In still a further embodiment in which an adsorptive media having a relatively fine average particle size is used (e.g. powdered carbon), the porous polymeric materials' pore size may range, for example, between about 1 μm and about 100 μm.
It is to be understood that any suitable porous polymeric material may be used that is substantially permeable to the desired adsorbate, yet substantially impermeable to the adsorptive media. Some non-limitative examples of suitable polymeric materials include, but are not limited to polyesters, polypropylenes, vinyl copolymers, polycarbonate, acetal, polyvinyl chloride, polyamides, and/or mixtures thereof It is to be understood that the layers 30, 34 may have any suitable thickness. In an embodiment, the thickness of each of the layers 30, 34 may range between about 0.007 inch (177.8 μm) and about 0.014 inch (355.6 μm).
As depicted in
Examples of suitable materials for the adsorptive media 38 include, but are not limited to carbon-based materials, zeolites, aluminum silicates, silica gels, cyclodextrins, silicone, and/or mixtures thereof. It is to be understood that of the materials listed, carbon-based materials may have the highest adsorptive capacity. A non-limitative example of a carbon-based material is a wood-based carbon material. Other non-limitative examples of carbon-based materials include powdered carbon, granular carbon, or carbon pellets. In one embodiment, the adsorptive media 38 is activated carbon.
Generally, powdered carbon may have a size ranging between about 1 μm and about 100 μm, granular carbon may have a size ranging between about 100 μm and about 200 μm, and carbon pellets may have a size ranging between about 200 μm and about 3500 μm. A non-limitative example of carbon pellets has a size ranging between about 1780 μm and about 3310 μm. It is, of course, understood that the carbon may have a size greater or less than the aforementioned ranges.
Referring now to
In an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the stack of materials 30, 34, 38 may be fastened at predetermined locations across the outer surfaces 46, 48 of the first and second layers 30, 34 (as best seen in
It is to be understood that fastening may be initiated through the first layer 30, the second layer 34, or through both layers 30, 34. As depicted in
The plurality of fasteners 44 subdivides the area 32 into a plurality of substantially enclosed and/or partially enclosed chambers 52. It is to be understood that the enclosed chambers 52 contain most or substantially all of the adsorptive media 38 therein. It is believed that the plurality of chambers 52 also advantageously provides substantially even distribution of the adsorptive media 38 throughout the filter/member 10. It is to be understood that, in various embodiments discussed herein (non-limitative examples of which include the embodiment(s) as shown in
In an alternative exemplary embodiment of the method, the chambers 52 (and first and second chamber 50, 54 shown in
In still another alternative exemplary embodiment, one chamber 52 may be formed such that it is initially partially enclosed. The chamber 52 may then be substantially filled with the desired amount of adsorptive media 38 and may be substantially/partially enclosed via establishment of the plurality of fasteners 44 and/or by seam welding. Further, the single chamber 52 may be formed with the adsorptive media 38 already therein.
In embodiment(s) of the method, a predetermined amount of the adsorptive media 38 is used. It is to be understood that a substantial amount of the adsorptive media 38 is contained within the enclosed chambers 52. The amount of adsorptive media 38 used may be dependant on, among other things, the amount of adsorbate to be adsorbed and the size of the adsorptive media 38. In an embodiment, the predetermined amount of the adsorptive media 38 used ranges between about 0.1 grams/square inch/side and about 1 gram/square inch/side. In a non-limitative example, one of the enclosed chambers 52 has about 0.35 grams of granular carbon adsorptive media 38 per square inch per side of the enclosed chamber 52.
It is to be understood that the predetermined amount of adsorptive media 38 may be substantially loose within the chambers 52 and does not include binders that may poison and/or otherwise deleteriously affect the media 38 surface area available for adsorption of the desired adsorbate. The loose media 38 and the lack of binders may substantially increase and/or maintain the adsorptive capacity and/or efficiency of the adsorptive media 38 without increasing the amount of adsorptive media 38 disposed within filter/member 10.
In a comparative example, a filter including activated carbon impregnated filter media obtained from AQF Technologies LLC in Charlotte, N.C. is compared to an embodiment of filter 10. Both filters have substantially similar capacities for adsorption of the desired adsorbate. In order to have similar capacities, both filters would include the same amount of carbon having surface area available for adsorption. The filter containing the AQF carbon media contains about 2.9 grams of carbon per cubic inch of the filter; while an embodiment of the filter 10 contains about 4.7 grams of carbon per cubic inch of filter 10. As such, in order for the AQF filter to include as much carbon as the filter 10, it would have to be made larger. This increase in the size of the AQF comparative filter is due, at least in part, to the polymeric fibrous binders attached to the carbon used in the AQF carbon media.
Without being bound to any theory, it is believed that the enclosed chambers 52 are substantially small in size so that may contain substantially small amounts of adsorptive media 38. It is to be understood that a thin (small) layer of the adsorptive media 38 may maximize the surface area of the media 38 available for adsorption. The exposed surface area of the adsorptive media 38 is increased, thereby advantageously offering a greater probability of interaction between the desired adsorbate and the adsorptive media 38, rendering a greater probability of capture of the desired adsorbate in the adsorptive media 38. In a non-limitative example, the exposed surface area of the adsorptive media 38 ranges between about 30 square inches and about 200 square inches.
It is to be understood that the filter/member 10 may be of any suitable thickness. In a non-limitative embodiment, the filter 10 has a thickness of about 0.1875 inch (4,762.5 μm).
Referring now to
Together,
As depicted in
Referring now to
It is to be understood that the intermediate layer 42 may act as a divider such that substantially all of the adsorptive media 38 is not located in the same area of the filter/member 10. The addition of the intermediate layer 42 and the separation of the adsorptive media 38 may advantageously ease the fastening (e.g. welding) process, as each of the first and second layers 30, 34 may fasten to the intermediate layer 42. Such fastening would be through a portion of the thickness of the adsorptive media 38 to layer 42; whereas without intermediate layer 42, the fastening of layers 30, 34 may be through substantially the entire thickness of the adsorptive media 38 (unless the media 38 is added to the filter 10 after first and second layers 30, 34 are joined (partially or substantially completely) to each other). The intermediate layer 42 may also advantageously increase the rigidity of the filter/member 10 without additional parts and/or cost. It is further believed that such added rigidity aids in obviating the need for a frame to contain the filter/member 10. However, it is to be understood that if a frame is desired for a particular end use, the filter/member 10 may also advantageously be utilized within a frame (not shown).
Referring specifically to
Embodiment(s) of the method disclosed herein may further include seam welding as desired (and as discussed further hereinbelow). Further, the method may include die cutting the adsorptive filter/member 10 into a predetermined shape. It is to be understood that the filter 10 may be cut into any suitable size and/or shape as desired and/or preferred for a particular end use.
Further, the filter/member 10 may include selectively articulatable members 62 connected to the filter 10 by any suitable means, for example by a living hinge 60 (or any other suitable hinge member). Members 62 may advantageously allow filter 10 to substantially conform to the desired surface. Members 62 may advantageously be formed from layers 30, 34, 38, 42.
In another alternative exemplary embodiment of the method, the first layer 30, the second layer 34, and the intermediate layer 42 (when used) are cut into a predetermined shape prior to the positioning and the establishing of the materials. Thus, the layers 30, 34, 42 may be shaped prior to the formation of the filter 10, as opposed to an embodiment in which the filter 10 is formed and then cut to a desired shape.
As previously indicated, the filter/member 10 may be adapted for use in a variety of applications and/or apparatuses. In a non-limitative example, the filter 10 may be used in an automobile air induction system 12 to trap hydrocarbon evaporative emissions. It is to be understood that after using the filter 10, it may be regenerated for reuse. Regeneration of the filter 10 may be accomplished by increased air flow, temperature swing adsorption (TSA), or pressure swing adsorption (PSA). In TSA, gas may be adsorbed in the adsorptive media 38 at a lower temperature and then may be desorbed from the adsorptive media when the temperature is raised. In PSA however, gas may be adsorbed in the adsorptive media 38 at higher pressures and then may be desorbed from the adsorptive media 38 at lower pressures.
In the embodiment(s) of the method disclosed herein, it is to be understood that each of the components 30, 34, 38 (and optionally 42) may be applied sequentially to form a stack of the materials that is fastened to form the adsorptive filter/member 10. For example, the second layer of polymeric material 34 may be positioned as a bottom layer; a layer of adsorptive media 38 may be established on the second layer 34; the intermediate layer 42 may optionally be established on the layer of adsorptive media 38; an additional layer of adsorptive media 38 may be established on the intermediate layer 42, if used; and the first layer of polymeric material 30 may be established on the layer (additional layer) of adsorptive media 38. The stack of materials/layers 30, 34, 38, and optionally 42 may then be fastened in predetermined places to form the adsorptive filter 10 having the plurality of substantially/partially enclosed chambers 52, or first and second chambers 50, 54.
Referring now to
Optionally, indicia may be placed on either or both of the outer surfaces 46, 48 of first and second polymeric layers 30, 34, respectively. The indicia may be applied by any suitable process, and may be any suitable indicia, as desired, non-limitative examples of which include alphanumeric indicia, graphical indicia, and the like. As shown, the indicia read “123 Corp., Jan. 1, 0000.”
In the embodiment shown in
It is to be understood that filter 10 may also be installed in a substantially flat configuration and/or any other suitable configuration, as desired. Although it is shown folded over/formed with the outer surface 46 of first polymeric layer 30 facing outward, it is to be understood that, if desired, it may be folded such that the outer surface 48 of second polymeric layer 34 may face outward. This embodiment also shows an example of various shapes, sizes and/or configurations of throughbores 56.
Referring now to
As mentioned hereinabove, and as best seen in
A non-limitative method for forming the filter 10 includes thermoforming first polymeric layer 30 (though it is to be understood that the second polymeric layer 34 may be the thermoformed layer, if desired, etc.) to form wells (which will become a surface of chambers 52); welding (for example, ultrasonically welding) the second polymeric layer 34 (or first polymeric layer 30, if second layer 34 is thermoformed) to the first polymeric layer 30, forming fasteners 44 (a non-limitative example of which includes spot welds) partially enclosed chambers 52 and seam welds 66 (but optionally leaving temporary open areas 68 as an area for media 38 ingress); filling chambers 52 with adsorptive media 38 through areas 68; closing areas 68 (if any) by welding; die cutting filter 10 to a desired shape; and punching throughbores 56 in desired areas. It is to be understood that the media 38 may be placed on the thermoformed layer 30 or 34 before or substantially simultaneous with the placement of the other of layer 34 or 30, and the two layers 30, 34 may be fastened together (e.g. by welding) with the adsorptive media 38 therebetween. In that instance, it would generally not be necessary to leave temporary open areas 68.
It is to be further understood that other suitable methods may be used to form the filter 10 according to various embodiments as described herein, as desired. Some suitable non-limitative examples of methods for making filter 10, as well as some advantages thereof, are as follows.
The thermoformed construction mentioned above may be created by supporting a first layer material (e.g. 30 or 34), and then contacting layer 30 or 34 with a forming shape die 80 with heat. As illustrated in
Another example of a suitable method is an insert mold frame design. This is constructed by using an injection molding tool, and inserting a pre-cut-to-shape fabric 30 or 34. The mold then provides the frame as well as pocketing (to form chambers 52) as needed. The pocketing is then filled with adsorptive media 38, and then a second layer of fabric 34 or 30 is applied to retain the media 38.
Yet another example of a suitable method is an extruded concept. This method extrudes a mixture of media 38 and poly fibers evenly. Then, by using heat, an extruded poly outer layer 30, 34 is applied to each side, respectively. This extruded mat may then be die cut to shape. The die cut part is then placed into either of the above-mentioned constructions, or may have an outer layer significant enough to allow for either of heat sealing or sonically sealing the edge to retain the media 38.
A further example of a suitable method is a foam construction, formed by a foam making process, and then die cut to shape.
Thermoformed construction provides a pocketing concept that may limit the loaded stress that the media 38 can sustain in a bag-like configuration without adding additional components (e.g. a frame). An insert molded frame construction may provide rigidity that may be useful under air flow straightening conditions, as well as providing pockets for even media 38 distribution. Extruded construction with non-woven outer support and similar inner material fibers distributed substantially evenly throughout provides a highly controlled distribution of media 38 over a defined area. Foam construction provides a simplified manufacturing process.
Embodiment(s) of the methods and adsorptive filters/members 10 offer many advantages, including, but not limited to the following. The amount of adsorptive media 38 used in the filter 10 may be decreased while advantageously increasing the adsorptive media's exposed surface area. Without being bound to any theory, it is believed that this characteristic may advantageously increase the probability of interaction with and subsequent capture of the desired adsorbate. Further, the adsorptive filter 10 may include an optional intermediate layer 42 that substantially prevents all of the adsorptive media 38 from being located in the same area of the filter 10, thereby advantageously aiding in fastening layers 30, 34 each to layer 42. Further, layer 42 may substantially increase the suspension for the adsorptive media 38, thereby advantageously increasing the available surface area of the adsorptive media 38. The intermediate layer 42 may also advantageously provide rigidity to the filter 10. Further, embodiments of the adsorptive filter 10 may advantageously have sufficient flexibility to ease installation of the filter 10 while maintaining sufficient rigidity to substantially obviate the need for a screen mesh and/or frame. This may advantageously reduce the need for additional materials, and thus may result in a decrease in manufacturing costs. Still further, embodiments of the filter 10 include loose adsorptive media 38 without the addition of binders, thus substantially increasing and/or maintaining the adsorptive capacity of the filter 10.
While several embodiments of the disclosure have been described in detail, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the disclosed embodiments may be modified. Therefore, the foregoing description is to be considered exemplary rather than limiting, and the true scope of the disclosure is that defined in the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/022,145 filed Jan. 29, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,655,166, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 10/978,923, filed Nov. 1, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,344,586, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/927,383, filed Aug. 26, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,377,966; and is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/806,942, filed Mar. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,163,574, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/392,044, filed Mar. 19, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,182,802, the contents each of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2201628 | Russell et al. | May 1940 | A |
2922418 | Heffernan et al. | Jan 1960 | A |
3093124 | Wentworth | Jun 1963 | A |
3191587 | Hall | Jun 1965 | A |
3352294 | Skarstrom et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3368326 | Hervert | Feb 1968 | A |
3393669 | Vardi et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
RE26530 | Wentworth | Mar 1969 | E |
3540423 | Tolles | Nov 1970 | A |
3541765 | Adler et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3563007 | Clarke | Feb 1971 | A |
3572013 | Hansen | Mar 1971 | A |
3572014 | Hansen | Mar 1971 | A |
3646731 | Hansen | Mar 1972 | A |
3678663 | Hansen | Jul 1972 | A |
4085721 | Vardi et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4136650 | Manookian, Jr. | Jan 1979 | A |
4217386 | Arons et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4250172 | Mutzenberg et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4261717 | Belore et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4279630 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4401447 | Huber | Aug 1983 | A |
4409950 | Goldberg | Oct 1983 | A |
4418662 | Engler et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4513047 | Leach et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4514197 | Armbruster | Apr 1985 | A |
4925468 | Kishi et al. | May 1990 | A |
5076821 | Bruhnke et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5087273 | Ward | Feb 1992 | A |
5129929 | Linnersten | Jul 1992 | A |
5207808 | Haruta et al. | May 1993 | A |
5354365 | Youn | Oct 1994 | A |
5466516 | Lutzow et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5486410 | Groeger et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5609761 | Franz | Mar 1997 | A |
5620505 | Koch et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5722358 | Fuesser et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5879423 | Luka et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5912368 | Satarino et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6152996 | Linnersten et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6200368 | Guerin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6374811 | Mancini | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383268 | Oda | May 2002 | B2 |
6402811 | Shanks et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6432179 | Lobovsky et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438486 | Mancini | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440200 | Sakakibara et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464761 | Bugli | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474312 | Zulauf et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505610 | Everingham et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6565627 | Golden et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6592655 | Iriyama et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6637415 | Yoshioka et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6679228 | Confer et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6692551 | Wernholm et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692554 | Leffel et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692555 | Oi et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6698403 | Honda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6699310 | Oda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6752859 | LaBarge et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6955376 | Labrie et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7115199 | Simonson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7344586 | Zulauf et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7377966 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20010035094 | Takagaki et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020029693 | Sakakibara et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020059920 | Yoshioka et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083838 | Incorvia et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030116021 | Oda et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030145726 | Gueret et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030145732 | Leffel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030183083 | Hau-Cheng Fu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192512 | Luley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196644 | Braun et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040011197 | Wernholm et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040050252 | Wernholm et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065197 | LaBarge et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079344 | Gimby et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083894 | Koyama et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050081712 | Koslow | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
250469 | Jun 1986 | DE |
10102604 | Jul 2002 | DE |
1273789 | Jan 2003 | EP |
5939751 | Mar 1984 | JP |
2001227421 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001263177 | Sep 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100101542 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12022145 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 12647181 | US | |
Parent | 10978923 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 12022145 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10392044 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10806942 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10927383 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 10978923 | US | |
Parent | 10806942 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 10927383 | US |