The present disclosure relates to an automotive evaporator; more particularly to a refrigerant expansion device for aliquoting a refrigerant through the refrigerant tubes of the automotive evaporator.
An air-conditioning system for a motor vehicle typically includes a refrigerant loop having an evaporator located within a heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) module for supplying conditioned air to the passenger compartment, an expansion device located upstream of the evaporator, a condenser located upstream of the expansion device in front of the engine compartment, and a compressor located within the engine compartment upstream of the condenser. The above mentioned components are hydraulically connected in series within the closed refrigerant loop.
The compressor compresses and circulates a refrigerant through the closed refrigerant loop. Starting from the inlet of the evaporator, a low pressure two phase refrigerant having mixture of liquid and vapor enters the evaporator and flows through the refrigerant tubes of the evaporator where it expands into a low pressure vapor refrigerant by absorbing heat from an incoming air stream. The low pressure vapor refrigerant then exits the outlet of the evaporator and enters the compressor where it is compressed into a high pressure high temperature vapor. The high pressure vapor refrigerant then flows through the condenser where it condenses into a high pressure liquid refrigerant by releasing the heat to the ambient air outside the motor vehicle. The condensed high pressure liquid refrigerant is returned to the evaporator through the expansion device, which expands the high pressure liquid refrigerant to a low pressure mixture of liquid-vapor refrigerant to repeat the cycle.
A conventional evaporator includes an inlet manifold, an outlet manifold, and a plurality of refrigerant tubes hydraulically connecting the manifolds. Additionally, there may be one or more intermediate manifolds, such as a return manifold, between the inlet and outlet manifold. The flow rate of refrigerant through the evaporator, typically in the range of 25 to 300 kg/hr for an R-134a refrigerant, depends predominantly on the rotational speed of the engine of the motor vehicle measured in revolutions per minute (rpm). This is a result of the compressor being driven directly by the engine via an accessory belt; hence, the compressor speed changes with the engine rpm.
It is desirable to be able to aliquot, break into equal parts, the two-phase refrigerant to the refrigerant tubes of the evaporator to provide uniform cooling of the airstream. If the two-phase refrigerant enters the inlet manifold at a relatively high velocity, the liquid phase of the refrigerant is carried by momentum of the flow further away from the entrance of the inlet manifold to the distal end of the inlet manifold. Hence, the refrigerant tubes closest to the inlet manifold entrance receive predominantly the vapor phase and the refrigerant tubes near the distal end of the inlet manifold receive predominantly the liquid phase. On the other hand, if the two-phase refrigerant enters the inlet manifold at a relatively low velocity, the refrigerant tubes closest to the inlet manifold entrance receives predominantly the liquid phase and the refrigerant tubes near the distal end of the inlet manifold receives predominantly the vapor phase. This is especially true as it relates to the mass fraction of refrigerant compared to the volume fraction. In either case, this results in the misaliquoting of the refrigerant flowing through the refrigerant tube causing degradation in the heat transfer efficiency of the evaporator.
An undesirable effect of misaliquoting of the liquid refrigerant is the skewing of the temperature map of the air coming off the evaporator. At a high refrigerant flow velocity, the temperature of the air stream across the refrigerant tubes at the distal end of the inlet manifold are lower compared to that of air stream across the tubes near the inlet. At low flow velocities this is reversed. The skewing and changing pattern of temperature of outlet air is undesirable. First, it is indicative of inefficient heat transfer process. Second, it prevents appropriately locating a temperature sensor on downstream face of the evaporator. This temperature sensor is intended to measure the lowest temperature of the air and it controls the fixed displacement compressor by switching it off when a set minimum temperature is reached, thereby protecting it from being damaged. The resulting non-uniform temperature pattern, which changes subject to the refrigerant flow velocity, causes difficulty in maintaining an even balance of vent temperatures out of the HVAC module. In certain instances, this imbalance in left and right vent temperatures causes perceptible discomfort to the vehicle occupants.
There is a need for a device which regulates the aliquoting of refrigerant flow in the inlet manifold to the refrigerant tubes and maintains an even pattern of temperature of the outlet air, despite changes in refrigerant flow velocity caused by the inherently varying engine speeds.
Briefly, one aspect of the invention is an automotive evaporator heat exchanger having a hybrid expansion device (HED). The evaporator includes an elongated inlet manifold defining an interior chamber extending along a manifold axis A and a plurality of refrigerant tubes extending into the interior chamber. The HED includes a first stage refrigerant pressure drop device configured to receive and expand a liquid phase refrigerant into a first mixture of two phase refrigerant and a second stage refrigerant pressure drop device disposed in the inlet manifold and configured to receive and expand the first mixture of two phase refrigerant into a second mixture of two phase refrigerant and aliquot the second mixture of two phase refrigerant to the open ends of the plurality of refrigerant tubes.
The first stage refrigerant pressure drop device is a TXV configured to receive and expand a liquid phase refrigerant into a first mixture of two phase refrigerant having about 75-85% by mass liquid phase. The second stage refrigerant pressure drop device is a tube having a plurality of orifices configured to expand the first mixture of two phase refrigerant into a second mixture of two phase refrigerant having about 65-75% by mass liquid phase. The preferred range of the internal diameter of the EOT is such that it should be large enough to prevent resistance to refrigerant flow where less than the allocated amount of the refrigerant is able to flow to the distal end 216 of the EOT, but, small enough to prevent the incoming first mixture of two phase refrigerant flow from separating into liquid and vapor strata.
The evaporator having an HED achieves 17% energy reduction as compared to an evaporator having only a conventional orifice tube. The evaporator having an HED also provides a noise-free, uniform temperature distribution, and quick transient refrigerant flows corresponding to varying engine rpm. Another benefit of the evaporator having an HED, is that it eliminates the need for an Accumulator/Dehydrator (A/D), which adds pressure drop and reduces the performance of the air-conditioning system. Every 1 psi of pressure drop in the suction line to the compressor results in an increase in air outlet temperature by almost 0.75° F. The A/D traditionally adds about 3 psi pressure drop at high flows.
In the drawings as hereinafter described, a preferred embodiment is depicted; however, various other modifications and alternative designs and construction can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Shown in
Shown in
Shown in
The second stage refrigerant pressure drop device 204 may be that of an EOT 204 disposed within the interior chamber 103 defined by the inlet manifold 102, extending substantially the length of the interior chamber 103 and substantially parallel with the manifold axis A. The EOT 204 includes an inlet end connector 214, a blind distal end 216 opposite that of the inlet end connector 214, and a plurality of orifices 206 therebetween. The inlet end connector 214 is in direct hydraulic connection with the upstream first stage refrigerant pressure drop device 202. The inlet end connector 214 having a first end outside the inlet manifold 102, receiving an outlet end of the first stage refrigerant pressure drop device 202, and having a second end, inside the inlet manifold 102, receiving an inlet end of the second stage refrigerant pressure drop device 204. The blind distal end 216 is typically mounted by capturing it in the end cap 117 of the inlet manifold 102. The plurality of orifices 206 may be arranged in a linear array parallel to the manifold axis A and oriented away from the inlet open ends 107 of the refrigerant tubes 106, preferably 180 degrees from the inlet open ends 107 and in the opposite direction of gravity. As shown in
The first stage refrigerant pressure drop device 202 shown in
The LP-TXV 202 is configured to provide a first mixture of two phase refrigerant to the EOT 204. The EOT 204 serves as a retention and expansion device where it retains and accumulates the first mixture of two phase refrigerant until the liquid part of the incoming mixture substantially fills the interior volume of the EOT 204 before being discharged through the orifices 206 as a second mixture of two phase refrigerant, thereby aliquoting the refrigerant across the refrigerant tubes 106. Referring to
Still referring to
Still referring to
As shown in
The length and internal diameter of the EOT 204 determines the resistance to axial flow of refrigerant and has a pressure drop associated with it. Similarly, the design of the orifice array, defined by the number and diameter of orifices, also determines a pressure drop associated with it. The pressure drop of the flow from the inlet end connector 214 to the distal end 216 inside the EOT 204 in the axial direction should be approximately 5% to 10% of the total pressure drop across EOT 204 for effective control at all flow velocities.
For the EOT 204, each orifice 206 and a segment of the EOT between it and the upstream orifice functions as a short orifice tube. Thus the EOT 204 can be considered as a series of multiple short orifice tubes connected end to end. This is how the EOT 204 differs from a conventional monolithic orifice tube which handles the total flow through it. By apportioning the total refrigerant flow equally to these short orifice tubes, uniform refrigerant aliquoting is achieved.
The preferred range of the internal diameter of the EOT is such that it should be large enough to prevent resistance to refrigerant flow where less than the allocated amount of the refrigerant is able to flow to the distal end 216 of the EOT, but, small enough to prevent the incoming first mixture of two phase refrigerant flow from separating into liquid and vapor strata.
The preferred orientation of the array of orifices is such that the orifices are oriented upward, away from the direction of gravity. It is preferable to orient the array of orifices 206 substantially upward and not sideways or downward with respect to the direction of gravity. If the orifices 206 are oriented substantially downward, the liquid phase refrigerant may drain out of the orifices 206 under the force of gravity soon after entering the EOT 204 and the orifices 206 nearest the inlet port 110 will be disproportionately favored by the liquid refrigerant leaving only a trickle of the liquid flowing to the last few orifices farthest from the inlet port 110. This is especially true at low refrigerant flow conditions.
The total pressure drop in the EOT 204 results in the lowering of the inlet quality of refrigerant, meaning the mass proportion of the liquid to vapor is increased, thereby, helping the distribution inside the EOT. Without the EOT 204, the mass proportion of the liquid to vapor phase entering the evaporator 100 will be lower, giving rise to poor distribution of refrigerant across the refrigerant tubes 106. Besides being an aliquoting mechanism, the EOT 204 is thus a throttling mechanism, but the throttling is happening in multiple stages spread out across the length of the EOT above the refrigerant tubes 106. Thus the refrigerant tubes 106 are receiving aliquoted flow compared to the situation when EOT is absent and the TXV is the sole throttling device present upstream of the inlet of the evaporator.
A benefit of the evaporator 100 having an HED 200 is that the evaporator having an HED achieves 17% energy reduction as compared to an evaporator having only a conventional orifice tube. Compared to the evaporator having only a TXV, the evaporator 100 having an HED 200 provides a noise-free, uniform temperature distribution, and is responsive to sudden transient refrigerant flows corresponding to varying engine rpm. Another benefit of evaporator 100 having an HED 200, is that it eliminates the need for an Accumulator/Dehydrator (A/D) in the downstream side of the evaporator, which is needed for conventional orifice tube systems and which adds pressure drop and reduces the performance of the air-conditioning system. Every 1 psi of pressure drop in the downstream side of the evaporator results in an increase in air outlet temperature by almost 0.75° F. The A/D traditionally adds about 3 psi pressure drop at high flows.
While this invention has been described in terms of the preferred embodiments thereof, it is not intended to be so limited, but rather only to the extent set forth in the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1684083 | Bloom | Jun 1927 | A |
3976128 | Patel et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
5651268 | Aikawa et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5806586 | Osthues et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5901785 | Chiba et al. | May 1999 | A |
5971065 | Bertilson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6161616 | Haussmann | Dec 2000 | A |
6729386 | Sather | May 2004 | B1 |
6814136 | Yi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7143605 | Rohrer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
8171987 | Jiang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20030116310 | Wittmann et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040026072 | Yi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20080093051 | Rios | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090073483 | Oomori | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090173482 | Beamer et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090229805 | Beamer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110000255 | Taras | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110290465 | Joshi | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120061064 | Stromer | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
02217764 | Aug 1990 | JP |
04309766 | Nov 1992 | JP |
2002062082 | Feb 2002 | JP |
9414021 | Jun 1994 | WO |
Entry |
---|
S. Lanzer, “How Thermostatic Expansion Valves (TXV) Work”, Jun. 24, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150121950 A1 | May 2015 | US |