Not Applicable.
As background, in the remote sensing/aerial imaging industry, imagery is used to capture views of a geographic area and to be able to measure objects and structures within the images as well as to be able to determine geographic locations of points within the image. These are generally referred to as “geo-referenced images” and come in two basic categories:
Captured Imagery—these images have the appearance they were captured by the camera or sensor employed.
Projected Imagery—these images have been processed and converted such that they confirm to a mathematical projection.
All imagery starts as captured imagery, but as most software cannot geo-reference captured imagery, that imagery is then reprocessed to create the projected imagery. The most common form of projected imagery is the ortho-rectified image. This process aligns the image to an orthogonal or rectilinear grid (composed of rectangles). The input image used to create an ortho-rectified image is a nadir image—that is, an image captured with the camera pointing straight down. It is often quite desirable to combine multiple images into a larger composite image such that the image covers a larger geographic area on the ground. The most common form of this composite image is the “ortho-mosaic image” which is an image created from a series of overlapping or adjacent nadir images that are mathematically combined into a single ortho-rectified image.
When creating an ortho-mosaic, this same ortho-rectification process is used, however, instead of using only a single input nadir image, a collection of overlapping or adjacent nadir images are used and they are combined to form a single composite ortho-rectified image known as an ortho-mosaic. In general, the ortho-mosaic process entails the following steps:
A rectilinear grid is created, which results in an ortho-mosaic image where every grid pixel covers the same amount of area on the ground.
The location of each grid pixel is determined from the mathematical definition of the grid. Generally, this means the grid is given an X and Y starting or origin location and an X and Y size for the grid pixels. Thus, the location of any pixel is simply the origin location plus the number of pixels times the size of each pixel. In mathematical terms: Xpixel=Xorigin+Xsize×Columnpixel and Ypixel=Yorigin+Ysize×Rowpixel.
The available nadir images are checked to see if they cover the same point on the ground as the grid pixel being filled. If so, a mathematical formula is used to determine where that point on the ground projects up onto the camera's pixel image map and that resulting pixel value is then transferred to the grid pixel.
Because the rectilinear grids used for the ortho-mosaic are generally the same grids used for creating maps, the ortho-mosaic images bear a striking similarity to maps and as such, are generally very easy to use from a direction and orientation standpoint.
In producing the geo-referenced aerial images, hardware and software systems designed for georeferencing airborne sensor data exist and are identified herein as a “POS”, i.e., a position and orientation system. For example, a system produced by Applanix Corporation of Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada and sold under the trademark “POS AV” provides a hardware and software system for directly georeferencing sensor data. Direct Georeferencing is the direct measurement of sensor position and orientation (also known as the exterior orientation parameters), without the need for additional ground information over the project area. These parameters allow data from the airborne sensor to be georeferenced to the Earth or local mapping frame. Examples of airborne sensors include: aerial cameras (digital or film-based), multi-spectral or hyper-spectral scanners, SAR, or LIDAR.
The POS system, such as the POS AV system, was mounted on a moving platform, such as an airplane, such that the airborne sensor was pointed toward the Earth. The positioning system received position signals from a satellite constellation and also received time signals from an accurate clock. The sensor was controlled by a computer running flight management software to take images. Signals indicative of the taking of an image were sent from the sensor to the positioning system to record the time and position where the image was taken.
However, the prior POS systems only included one or two ports for recording the time of sensor capture and position of only one or two independent sensors. The industry standard method for solving this problem is to slave one or more cameras to another camera and then to actuate all of the cameras simultaneously. However, this does not permit independent actuation of each of the cameras.
If more than two independent sensors are to be used with the prior positioning system, then a separate system for recording the time and position of sensor capture must be developed. It is to such a system for recording the time of sensor that the present invention is directed.
Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction, experiments, exemplary data, and/or the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for purposes of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
Referring to the drawings, and in particular to
The images can be oblique images, orthogonal images, or nadir images, or combinations thereof.
As shown in
In certain embodiments depicted in
The image capture devices 14 are mounted to the moving platform 21, and once mounted are typically calibrated so that the exact position and orientation of the image capture devices 14 are known with respect to at least a portion of the moving platform 21. For example, as shown in
Each of the image capture devices 14 has a sensor (not shown) for capturing sensor data, such as an image. Each of the image capture devices 14 is also provided with an event channel 26 providing an event signal indicating the capturing of an image by the sensor. The event channel 26 can be any device that provides a signal coincident with the capturing of the image, such as a flash output. The sensor can capture the image in an analog manner, digital manner, or on film. Further, it should be understood that the image can be stored electronically, optically, or provided on a film-based medium.
The event multiplexer system 18 has at least one image capture input 28 and at least one output port 30. In a preferred embodiment the event multiplexer system 18 has at least two image capture inputs 28. Each image capture input 28 receives signals from the event channel 26 of one of the image capture devices 14. The event multiplexer system 18 outputs event signals indicative of an order of events indicated by the signals provided by the image capture devices 14, and an identification (CID) of image capture devices 14 providing the event signals.
The monitoring system 16 records data indicative of the capturing of the images. For example, the monitoring system 16 can record position data as a function of time, time data and/or orientation data. In the embodiments depicted in
In the embodiments depicted in
The computer system 20 receives and stores (preferably in the database 38) the information indicative of the order of events indicated by the event signals, and identification of image capture devices 14 providing the event signals. The computer system 20 optionally also receives and stores the images (preferably in the database 38) generated by the image capture devices 14. The monitoring system 16 records the data indicative of the capturing of images by storing it internally, outputting it to the computer system 20, or outputting such data in any other suitable manner, such as storing such data on an external magnetic or optical storage system. The position related to the moving platform 21 can be provided in any suitable coordinate system, such as an X, Y, Z coordinate system, or a WGS1984 latitude/longitude coordinate system.
Further, the image capture system 10 can be provided with an orientation system, such as an inertial measurement unit 40 for capturing other types of information with respect to the moving platform 21, such as the orientation of the moving platform 21. The inertial measurement unit 40 can be provided with a variety of sensors, such as accelerometers (not shown) for determining the roll, pitch and yaw related to the moving platform 21. Further, it should be understood that the position and/or orientation information does not necessarily have to be a position and/or orientation of the moving platform 21. The position and orientation information is simply related to the moving platform 21, i.e. the position and/or orientation of the moving platform 21 should be able to be determined by the information recorded by the monitoring system 16. For example, the position and orientation information can be provided for a device connected to the moving platform 21. Then, the position and orientation for each image capture device can be determined based upon their known locations relative to the moving platform 21.
Shown in
The memory device 54 can be formed by a first-in-first-out register or any other type of device capable of optionally recording the identity of the image capture device 14 providing the signal, and a sequential order of events based upon the order in which the signals are received.
The computer interface 48 is connected to the memory device 54 to permit the computer system 20 to read the data in the memory device 54. The computer interface 48 can be a device capable of reading the information from the memory device 54 and providing same to the computer system 20. For example, the computer interface 48 can be a serial port, parallel port or a USB port.
For example,
Shown in
Each of the event multiplexers 46a and 46b provide event signals indicative of an order of events based upon the respective signals received from the image capture devices C1-C5. The event signals provided by the event multiplexers 46a and 46b can be provided to different ports of the monitoring system 16, or to different monitoring systems for causing the monitoring system(s) 16 to read and/or record the data indicative of the position as a function of time related to the moving platform 21.
The computer interface 48a communicates with the event multiplexers 46a and 46b to permit the computer system 20 to read the data from the memory devices and store it on a computer readable medium accessible by the computer system 20. The computer interface 48a can be a device capable of reading the information from the memory device(s) and providing same to the computer system 20. For example, the computer interface 48a can be a serial port, parallel port or a USB port.
Shown in
The computer interface 48a and the event multiplexers 46a and 46b can be constructed in a similar manner as the computer interface 48 and event multiplexer 46 described above. Each of the event multiplexers 46a and 46b provide event signals indicative of an order of events based upon the respective signals received from the image capture devices C1-C5 via the multiplexer director 70. The event signals provided by the event multiplexers 46a and 46b can be provided to different ports of the monitoring system 16, or to different monitoring systems 16 for causing the monitoring system(s) 16 to read and/or record the data indicative of the position as a function of time related to the moving platform 21.
The computer interface 48a communicates with the event multiplexers 46a and 46b to permit the computer system 20 to read the data indicative of the order of events E(t) from the respective memory devices and store such data E(t) on a computer readable medium accessible by the computer system 20.
Shown in
Thus, the event multiplexer systems 18, 18a, and 18b record order of event and optionally record identification of camera information. The event multiplexer systems 18, 18a and 18b utilize an external timing device (i.e., the monitoring system 16 or the computer system 20) to correlate event with time and thus location. The event multiplexer system 18c, receives and records absolute time in addition to the order of events and identification of image capture devices 14. Thus, “order of event” could include relative or absolute time.
The image capture system 10a is provided with one or more image capture devices 14a, one or more monitoring systems 16a, one or more event multiplexer systems 18c, and one or more computer systems 20a and one or more inertial measurement unit 40a.
The image capture devices 14a, the monitoring system 16a and inertial measurement unit 40a are similar in construction and function as the image capture devices 14, monitoring system 16 and inertial measurement unit 40 described above.
The event multiplexer system 18c is similar in construction and function as the event multiplexer system 18, 18a and 18b described above, with the exception that the event multiplexer system 18c receives absolute time signals, such as a (PPS) and time sync signal from the monitoring system 16a (or a separate time receiver) and records the absolute time each instance in which a signal is received from one of the image capture devices 14a. The time signal is preferably an accurate signal received from a satellite constellation or an atomic clock. In addition, the absolute time of each event (T, E(t)), and an identification of the image capture device 14a for each event (CID) is passed to the computer system 20a.
The monitoring system 16a passes signals to the computer system 20a indicative of the position of the moving platform 21 as a function of time, and the image capture devices 14a pass the captured images to the computer system 20a. Thus, the computer system 20a is provided with and stores the information for correlating the data indicative of position as a function of time with particular captured images.
The event multiplexer system 18c can also optionally provide event signals e(t) to the monitoring system 16a in a similar manner as the event multiplexer systems 18, 18a and 18b described above, for purposes of redundancy, and/or verification of the data. The event signals e(t) can also optionally be provided to the computer system 20a from the monitoring system 16a and in this instance the computer system 20a optionally compares e(t) with E(t) for calibration, diagnostic or feedback purposes to make sure that the time sync signal is correct.
In using the systems depicted in
In using the system depicted in
It will be understood from the foregoing description that various modifications and changes may be made in the preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention without departing from its true spirit.
This description is intended for purposes of illustration only and should not be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of this invention should be determined only by the language of the claims that follow. The term “comprising” within the claims is intended to mean “including at least” such that the recited listing of elements in a claim are an open group. “A,” “an” and other singular terms are intended to include the plural forms thereof unless specifically excluded.
The present patent application claims priority to the provisional patent application identified by U.S. Ser. No. 60/901,444, which was filed on Feb. 15, 2007, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2273876 | Lutz et al. | Feb 1942 | A |
3153784 | Petrides et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
3594556 | Edwards | Jul 1971 | A |
3614410 | Bailey | Oct 1971 | A |
3621326 | Hobrough | Nov 1971 | A |
3661061 | Tokarz | May 1972 | A |
3716669 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3725563 | Woycechowsky | Apr 1973 | A |
3864513 | Halajian et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3866602 | Furihata | Feb 1975 | A |
3877799 | O'Donnell | Apr 1975 | A |
4015080 | Moore-Searson | Mar 1977 | A |
4044879 | Stahl | Aug 1977 | A |
4184711 | Wakimoto | Jan 1980 | A |
4240108 | Levy | Dec 1980 | A |
4281354 | Conte | Jul 1981 | A |
4344683 | Stemme | Aug 1982 | A |
4360876 | Girault et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4382678 | Thompson et al. | May 1983 | A |
4387056 | Stowe | Jun 1983 | A |
4396942 | Gates | Aug 1983 | A |
4463380 | Hooks | Jul 1984 | A |
4489322 | Zulch et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4490742 | Wurtzinger | Dec 1984 | A |
4491399 | Bell | Jan 1985 | A |
4495500 | Vickers | Jan 1985 | A |
4527055 | Harkless et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4543603 | Laures | Sep 1985 | A |
4586138 | Mullenhoff et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4635136 | Ciampa et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4653136 | Denison | Mar 1987 | A |
4653316 | Fukuhara | Mar 1987 | A |
4673988 | Jansson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686474 | Olsen et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4688092 | Kamel et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4689748 | Hofmann | Aug 1987 | A |
4707698 | Constant et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4758850 | Archdale et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4805033 | Nishikawa | Feb 1989 | A |
4807024 | Mclaurin et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4814711 | Olsen et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4814896 | Heitzman et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4843463 | Michetti | Jun 1989 | A |
4899296 | Khattak | Feb 1990 | A |
4906198 | Cosimano et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4953227 | Katsuma et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4956872 | Kimura | Sep 1990 | A |
5034812 | Rawlings | Jul 1991 | A |
5086314 | Aoki et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5121222 | Endoh et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5138444 | Hiramatsu | Aug 1992 | A |
5155597 | Lareau et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5164825 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166789 | Myrick | Nov 1992 | A |
5191174 | Chang et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200793 | Ulich et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210586 | Grage et al. | May 1993 | A |
5231435 | Blakely | Jul 1993 | A |
5247356 | Ciampa | Sep 1993 | A |
5251037 | Busenberg | Oct 1993 | A |
5265173 | Griffin et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267042 | Tsuchiya et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270756 | Busenberg | Dec 1993 | A |
5296884 | Honda et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5335072 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342999 | Frei et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345086 | Bertram | Sep 1994 | A |
5353055 | Hiramatsu | Oct 1994 | A |
5369443 | Woodham | Nov 1994 | A |
5402170 | Parulski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414462 | Veatch | May 1995 | A |
5467271 | Abel et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5481479 | Wight et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486948 | Imai et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506644 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5508736 | Cooper | Apr 1996 | A |
5555018 | von Braun | Sep 1996 | A |
5604534 | Hedges et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617224 | Ichikawa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5633946 | Lachinski et al. | May 1997 | A |
5668593 | Lareau et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677515 | Selk et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5798786 | Lareau et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5835133 | Moreton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841574 | Willey | Nov 1998 | A |
5844602 | Lareau et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852753 | Lo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5894323 | Kain et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899945 | Baylocq et al. | May 1999 | A |
5963664 | Kumar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6088055 | Lareau et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094215 | Sundahl et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097854 | Szeliski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108032 | Hoagland | Aug 2000 | A |
6130705 | Lareau et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157747 | Szeliski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167300 | Cherepenin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6222583 | Matsumura et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236886 | Cherepenin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256057 | Mathews et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6373522 | Mathews et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6421610 | Carroll et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434280 | Peleg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6597818 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6639596 | Shum et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6711475 | Murphy | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6731329 | Feist et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6747686 | Bennett | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6834128 | Altunbasak et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6876763 | Sorek et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7009638 | Gruber et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018050 | Ulichney et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7046401 | Dufaux et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7061650 | Walmsley et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065260 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7123382 | Walmsley et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127348 | Smitherman et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142984 | Rahmes et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7233691 | Setterholm | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7262790 | Bakewell | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7348895 | Lagassey | Mar 2008 | B2 |
8078396 | Meadow et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20020041328 | LeCompte et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020041717 | Murata et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020114536 | Xiong et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030014224 | Guo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043824 | Remboski et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088362 | Melero et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030214585 | Bakewell | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040105090 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040167709 | Smitherman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050073241 | Yamauchi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088251 | Matsumoto | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050169521 | Hel-Or | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060028550 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060092043 | Lagassey | May 2006 | A1 |
20060195858 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060238383 | Kimchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250515 | Koseki et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070024612 | Balfour | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046448 | Smitherman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070237420 | Steedly et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080120031 | Rosenfeld et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123994 | Schultz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080273090 | Niimura | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
331204 | Jul 2006 | AT |
9783798 | Apr 1999 | AU |
3874400 | Sep 2000 | AU |
03291364 | Jun 2004 | AU |
0316110 | Sep 2005 | BR |
2402234 | Sep 2000 | CA |
2505566 | May 2004 | CA |
1735897 | Feb 2006 | CN |
60017384 | Mar 2006 | DE |
60306301 | Nov 2006 | DE |
1418402 | Oct 2006 | DK |
0424875 | Oct 1990 | EP |
1180967 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1418402 | May 2004 | EP |
1696204 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2266704 | Mar 2007 | ES |
1088421 | Nov 2006 | HK |
2003317089 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2006505794 | Feb 2006 | JP |
PA05004987 | Feb 2006 | MX |
200503341 | May 2007 | SG |
WO9918732 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO0053090 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO2004044692 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2005088251 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2008028040 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008081993 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ackermann, Prospects of Kinematic GPS Aerial Triangulation, ITC Journal, 1992. |
Ciampa, John A., “Pictometry Digital Video Mapping”, SPIE, vol. 2598, pp. 140-148, 1995. |
Ciampa, J. A., Oversee, Presented at Reconstruction After Urban earthquakes, Buffalo, NY, 1989. |
Dunford et al., Remote Sensing for Rural Development Planning in Africa, The Journal for the International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Sciences, 2:99-108, 1983. |
Gagnon, P.A., Agnard, J. P., Nolette, C., & Boulianne, M., “A Micro-Computer based General Photogrammetric System”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 56, No. 5., pp. 623-625, 1990. |
Konecny, G., “Issues of Digital Mapping”, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany, GIS Ostrava 2008, Ostrava 27.—Jan. 30, 2008, pp. 1-8. |
Konecny, G., “Analytical Aerial Triangulation with Convergent Photography”, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick, pp. 37-57, 1966. |
Konecny, G., “Interior Orientation and Convergent Photography”, Photogrammetric Engineering, pp. 625-634, 1965. |
Graham, Lee A., “Airborne Video for Near-Real-Time Vegetation Mapping”, Journal of Forestry, 8:28-32, 1993. |
Graham, Horita TRG-50 SMPTE Time-Code Reader, Generator, Window Inserter, 1990. |
Hess, L.L, et al., “Geocoded Digital Videography for Validation of Land Cover Mapping in the Amazon Basin”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 1527-1555, 2002. |
Hinthorne, J., et al., “Image Processing in The Grass GIS”, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 4:2227-2229, 1991. |
Imhof, Ralph K., “Mapping from Oblique Photographs”, Manual of Photogrammetry, Chapter 18. |
Jensen, John R., Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice-Hall, 1986; 399 pages. |
Lapine, Lewis A., “Practical Photogrammetric Control by Kinematic GPS”, GPS World, 1(3):44-49, 1990. |
Lapine, Lewis A., Airborne Kinematic GPS Positioning for Photogrammetry—The Determination of the Camera Exposure Station, Silver Spring, MD, 11 pages, at least as early as 2000. |
Linden et al., Airborne Video Automated Processing, US Forest Service Internal report, Fort Collins, CO, 1993. |
Myhre, Dick, “Airborne Video System Users Guide”, USDA Forest Service, Forest Pest Management Applications Group, published by Management Assistance Corporation of America, 6 pages, 1992. |
Myhre et al., “An Airborne Video System Developed Within Forest Pest Management—Status and Activities”, 10 pages, 1992. |
Myhre et al., “Airborne Videography—A Potential Tool for Resource Managers”—Proceedings: Resource Technology 90, 2nd International Symposium on Advanced Technology in Natural Resource Management, 5 pages, 1990. |
Myhre et al., Aerial Photography for Forest Pest Management, Proceedings of Second Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference, Slidell, Louisiana, 153-162, 1988. |
Myhre et al., “Airborne Video Technology”, Forest Pest Management/Methods Application Group, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 1-6, at least as early as Jul. 30, 2006. |
Norton-Griffiths et al., 1982. “Sample surveys from light aircraft combining visual observations and very large scale color photography”. University of Arizona Remote Sensing Newsletter 82-2:1-4. |
Norton-Griffiths et al., “Aerial Point Sampling for Land Use Surveys”, Journal of Biogeography, 15:149-156, 1988. |
Novak, Rectification of Digital Imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 339-344, 1992. |
Slaymaker, Dana M., “Point Sampling Surveys with GPS-logged Aerial Videography”, Gap Bulletin No. 5, University of Idaho, http://www.gap.uidaho.edu/Bulletins/5/PSSwGPS.html, 1996. |
Slaymaker, et al., “Madagascar Protected Areas Mapped with GPS-logged Aerial Video and 35mm Air Photos”, Earth Observation magazine, vol. 9, No. 1, http://www.eomonline.com/Common/Archives/2000jan/00jan—tableofcontents.html, pp. 1-4, 2000. |
Slaymaker, et al., “Cost-effective Determination of Biomass from Aerial Images”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1737:67-76, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=648004.743267&coll=GUIDE&dl=, 1999. |
Slaymaker, et al., “A System for Real-time Generation of Geo-referenced Terrain Models”, 4232A-08, SPIE Enabling Technologies for Law Enforcement Boston, MA, ftp://vis-ftp.cs.umass.edu/Papers/schultz/spie2000.pdf, 2000. |
Slaymaker, et al.,“Integrating Small Format Aerial Photography, Videography, and a Laser Profiler for Environmental Monitoring”, In ISPRS WG III/1 Workshop on Integrated Sensor Calibration and Orientation, Portland, Maine, 1999. |
Slaymaker, et al., “Calculating Forest Biomass With Small Format Aerial Photography, Videography and a Profiling Laser”, In Proceedings of the 17th Biennial Workshop on Color Photography and Videography in Resource Assessment, Reno, NV, 1999. |
Slaymaker et al., Mapping Deciduous Forests in Southern New England using Aerial Videography and Hyperclustered Multi-Temporal Landsat TM Imagery, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Massachusetts. |
Star et al., “Geographic Information Systems an Introduction”, Prentice-Hall, 1990. |
Tomasi et al., “Shape and Motion from Image Streams: a Factorization Method”—Full Report on the Orthographic Case, pp. 9795-9802, 1992. |
Warren, Fire Mapping with the Fire Mousetrap, Aviation and Fire Management, Advanced Electronics System Development Group, USDA Forest Service, 1986. |
Welch, R., “Desktop Mapping with Personal Computers”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1651-1662, 1989. |
Westervelt, James, “Introduction to GRASS 4”, pp. 1-25, 1991. |
“RGB Spectrum Videographics Report, vol. 4, No. 1, McDonnell Douglas Integrates RGB Spectrum Systems in Helicopter Simulators”, pp. 1-6, 1995. |
RGB “Computer Wall”, RGB Spectrum, 4 pages, 1995. |
“The First Scan Converter with Digital Video Output”, Introducing . . . The RGB/Videolink 1700D-1, RGB Spectrum, 2 pages, 1995. |
ERDAS Field Guide, Version 7.4, A Manual for a commercial image processing system, 1990. |
“Image Measurement and Aerial Photography”, Magazine for all branches of Photogrammetry and its fringe areas, Organ of the German Photogrammetry Association, Berlin-Wilmersdorf, No. 1, 1958. |
“Airvideo Analysis”, MicroImages, Inc., Lincoln, NE, 1 page, Dec. 1992. |
Zhu, Zhigang, Hanson, Allen R., “Mosaic-Based 3D Scene Representation and Rendering”, Image Processing, 2005, ICIP 2005, IEEE International Conference on 1(2005). |
Mostafa, et al., “Direct Positioning and Orientation Systems How do they Work? What is the Attainable Accuracy?”, Proceeding, American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO, Apr. 24-27, 2001. |
“POS AV” georeferenced by APPLANIX aided inertial technology, http://www.applanix.com/products/posav—index.php. |
Mostafa, et al., “Ground Accuracy from Directly Georeferenced Imagery”, Published in GIM International vol. 14 N. Dec. 12, 2000. |
Mostafa, et al., “Airborne Direct Georeferencing of Frame Imagery: An Error Budget”, The 3rd International Symposium on Mobile Mapping Technology, Cairo, Egypt, Jan. 3-5, 2001. |
Mostafa, M.R. and Hutton, J., “Airborne Kinematic Positioning and Attitude Determination Without Base Stations”, Proceedings, International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics, and Navigation (KIS 2001) Banff, Alberta, Canada, Jun. 4-8, 2001. |
Mostafa, et al., “Airborne DGPS Without Dedicated Base Stations for Mapping Applications”, Proceedings of ION-GPS 2001, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Sep. 11-14. |
Mostafa, “ISAT Direct Exterior Orientation QA/QC Strategy Using POS Data”, Proceedings of OEEPE Workshop: Integrated Sensor Orientation, Hanover, Germany, Sep. 17-18, 2001. |
Mostafa, “Camera/IMU Boresight Calibration: New Advances and Performance Analysis”, Proceedings of the ASPRS Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Apr. 21-26, 2002. |
Hiatt, “Sensor Integration Aids Mapping at Ground Zero”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Sep. 2002, p. 877-878. |
Mostafa, “Precision Aircraft GPS Positioning Using CORS”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Nov. 2002, p. 1125-1126. |
Mostafa, et al., System Performance Analysis of INS/DGPS Integrated System for Mobile Mapping System (MMS), Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Commission VI, WG VI/4. |
Artes F., & Hutton, J., “GPS and Inertial Navigation Delivering”, Sep. 2005, GEOconnexion International Magazine, p. 52-53. |
“POS AV” APPLANIX, Product Outline, airborne@applanix.com, 3 pages. |
POSTrack, “Factsheet”, APPLANIX, Ontario, Canada, www.applanix.com. |
POS AV “Digital Frame Camera Applications”, 3001 Inc., Brochure, 2007. |
POS AV “Digital Scanner Applications”, Earthdata Brochure,. |
POS AV “Film Camera Applications” AeroMap Brochure. |
POS AV “LIDAR Applications” MD Atlantic Brochure. |
POS AV “OEM System Specifications”, 2005. |
POS AV “Synthetic Aperture Radar Applications”, Overview, Orbisat Brochure. |
“POSTrack V5 Specifications” 2005. |
“Remote Sensing for Resource Inventory Planning and Monitoring”, Proceeding of the Second Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference—Slidell, Louisiana and NSTL, Mississippi, Apr. 11-15, 1988. |
“Protecting Natural Resources with Remote Sensing”, Proceeding of the Third Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference—Apr. 9-13, 1990. |
Heipke, et al, “Test Goals and Test Set Up for the OEEPE Test—Integrated Sensor Orientation”, 1999. |
Kumar, et al., “Registration of Video to Georeferenced Imagery”, Sarnoff Corporation, CN5300, Princeton, NJ, 1998. |
McConnel, Proceedings Aerial Pest Detection and Monitoring Workshop—1994.pdf, USDA Forest Service Forest Pest Management, Northern Region, Intermountain regiion, Forest Insects and Diseases, Pacific Northwest Region. |
“Standards for Digital Orthophotos”, National Mapping Program Technical Instructions, US Department of the Interior, Dec. 1996. |
Tao, “Mobile Mapping Technology for Road Network Data Acquisition”, Journal of Geospatial Engineering, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-13, 2000. |
“Mobile Mapping Systems Lesson 4”, Lesson 4 SURE 382 Geographic Information Systems II, pp. 1-29, Jul. 2, 2006. |
Konecny, G., “Mechanische Radialtriangulation mit Konvergentaufnahmen”, Bildmessung und Luftbildwesen, 1958, Nr. 1. |
Myhre, “ASPRS/ACSM/RT 92” Technical papers, Washington, D.C., vol. 5 Resource Technology 92, Aug. 3-8, 1992. |
Rattigan, “Towns get new view from above,” The Boston Globe, Sep. 5, 2002. |
Mostafa, et al., “Digital image georeferencing from a multiple camera system by GPS/INS,” ISP RS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 56(1): I-12, Jun. 2001. |
Dillow, “Grin, or bare it, for aerial shot,” Orange County Register (California), Feb. 25, 200I. |
Anonymous, “Live automatic coordinates for aerial images,” Advanced Imaging, 12(6):51, Jun. 1997. |
Anonymous, “Pictometry and US Geological Survey announce—Cooperative Research and Development Agreement,” Press Release published Oct. 20, 1999. |
Miller, “Digital software gives small Arlington the Big Picture,” Government Computer News State & Local, 7(12), Dec. 2001. |
Garrett, “Pictometry: Aerial photography on steroids,” Law Enforcement Technology 29(7):114-116, Jul. 2002. |
Weaver, “County gets an eyeful,” The Post-Standard (Syracuse, NY), May 18, 2002. |
Reed, “Firm gets latitude to map O.C. in 3D,” Orange County Register (California), Sep. 27, 2000. |
Reyes, “Orange County freezes ambitious aerial photography project,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 16, 2000. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability. |
Examination Report, Nov. 17, 2010. |
English Translation of EP 0 424 875 A2. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, May 23, 2008. |
Response to Examination Report dated May 17, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080204570 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60901444 | Feb 2007 | US |