Teeing the golf ball is required and recommended by all teaching methods available since the early days of the golf game itself. A golf tee allows the golfer to tee a golf ball to a prescribed height in relationship to the face of the golf club they have selected. Of significant importance is the relationship of the teed golf ball at impact to the ideal contact point of the face of each and every golf club. Not optimizing this relationship between the teed golf ball and the club face will cost the golfer both distance and accuracy and result in higher scores. This is issue not in dispute among the teaching professionals, golf club manufacturers, and the golfing community. How to accomplish this, however, varies widely, even when a golfer assumes a proper stance, grip, head position, or many other factors. As difficult as the game of golf is, one thing that should be easy, is simply placing a golf ball on a tee at the optimum height for the golf club selected by the golfer. It is not, and no one has found a simple method that works for modern era oversize golf clubs for those novice, high handicap, or untrained golfers without the need to take lessons, read and memorize, and study various charts, graphs, POP displays or use external devices or attachments. In most cases even these are inaccurate or misleading.
Hitting each golf club in the optimum or ideal area of the club face is not, as shown thru robotic golf club testing, the exact center of the club face. Many inaccurate and inferior golf tees would have you believe it is the sweet spot, however testing shows there are other factors in play on every swing a golfer makes, such as launch angle and ball spin. Robotic testing and high speed filming weren't readily available to the public until recently. Old methods are obsolete, inferior, misleading and inaccurate. In 1990 Mizuno created the first titanium driver and driver head size went from 250 cc to 300 cc. The light weight of titanium allowed manufacturers to make larger, more forgiving (larger sweet spot) drivers with longer shafts as well as other oversize clubs like utility woods, 3,4,5 and hybrid clubs and larger irons.
The following year, driver head sizes went up again. On average, drivers were up to 400 cc in 2000, and they continued the upward trend until 2002 when they went to an enormous size of 500 cc. For fear of loosing the integrity of the game, the USGA stepped in and implemented some restrictions to take effect on Jan. 1, 2004 limiting the maximum size of golf club heads to 460 cc's.
One of these restrictions, limiting the driver head size to a maximum of 460 cc's, and for the purposes of this present invention, the Exact Tee, we will define this era from 2004 to present day, as the “modern era” of oversize golf clubs.
Estimates of the number of US golfers are currently in the 28 million range with a worldwide golfing participation exceeding 55 million. These estimates, from various golf governing bodies, does not count golfers under the age of 18. So, the actual numbers are even higher. From these estimates we know, from the same sources, that 80% of all amateur golfers are a 20 handicap or higher. This handicap reflects an average score of over 100+ every time an amateur in this category plays a round of golf. These golfers are mostly novice, part time, untrained, unskilled, or have other encumbrances that prevent them from improving their scores.
For Example: The most often replaced golf club in a golfers bag is the driver. Golfers see a new driver on TV that claims to add 5 or 10 more yards and they flock to buy it, not realizing that even a ¼″ miss of the on their current drivers ideal sweet spot can cost 10 or more yards. Amateur golfers in this category replace the driver the most, as all believe that 5-10 more yards will allow them to shoot a lower score. The driver is also the club in this same group hits and practices more often. Better golfers know that the short game and better putting are the keys to lower scores. But such as it is, this group continues to rely on the driver for improvement, unaware possibly that the driver not only is the longest club, but the most difficult to master. This is the group, the 80% of amateurs that are novice, untrained, or high handicap golfers, for whatever reason, that the “Exact Tee” golf training system addresses.
While golf is, and will always be, an extremely difficult game to play, one advantage given to golfers by the rules of the game, is that at the beginning of every hole the golfer may tee their golf ball. Ideally a golfer would want to tee the golf ball to a height that if they were to make the correct swing the golf club face would make contact with the golf ball at the best or optimum point for maximum distance and accuracy. This process while simple is rarely taken advantage of by this 80 percent group mostly because of lack of training, knowledge, or inaccurate or outdated methods or devices.
Inventors have designed golf tees that have bands of different colors and then associate those colors with certain clubs on a chart or reference a web site to research. There are tees that have a set of numbers and an external device to stop or be placed or attached at certain places on the tee for certain clubs. There are tees of different lengths designed so that various lengths stop at different heights and again associate a certain length of a tee to a certain golf club. All of these variations of the golf tee address the issue of trying to get the golfer to properly align the golf ball height to the sweet spot or center of the club face and not the optimum contact point or actual impact sweet spot, which is not the center of the club face, once a golf ball is struck and launch angle and ball spin are factored in.
In order to do this however, on any of these variations, it requires the golfer to either have knowledge of the game of golf and these devices and their relationship to each golf club, or more specifically to the relationship of the height of the golf ball at address to the face of the club they choose to hit for that hole, or it requires the golfer to learn this, or seek training, or review a chart, display, graph and memorize these facts and or carry a copy to be viewed as they play the round itself. The facts are, prior inventions have failed to solve this.
For example, Merullo (U.S. Pat. No. 7,717,811) uses various length tees with very wide bands, and no actual specific point, then requires the golfer to refer to a chart or POP display and look up their club(s), then memorize the research, and then surmise a point within the wide band to use. The system is flawed and vague. Furthermore, the chart or POP display is based on a formula that calculates the center of the club face and determines that to be the sweet spot. Testing these modern era oversize golf clubs has shown this formula is incorrect, and thus this system is inaccurate, flawed, vague, and misleading to golfers. Several other patents use removable type restrictors or attachments, some of which are screwed on like such as Young (U.S. Pat No. 6,729,977), others like Cabot (U.S. Pat No. 3,114,557), Strong (U.S. Pat. No. 5,672,122), Thomas (U.S. Pat. No. D370,041), Kirikos (U.S. Pat. No. 3,408,079), Antonious (U.S. Pat. No. 3,203,700) use attachments, restrictors, or other gadget to make them work. None of these use any type of current scientific robotic testing, but are rather marked with random indicators and the golfer must decide using only his or her judgment based on a best guess as there is nothing definitive in reference to their golf clubs and where the ideal contact spot on the face of said club actually is. None of these inventions solve the problem of training a golfer how high to tee a golf ball for their clubs.
There are currently 4 common size golf tees, regardless of composition, such as wood, plastic, metal, etc., they are 2⅜, 2%, 3¼, and 4.″ The most common size golf tee sold is the 2¼, according to statistics published by the Golf Tee Manufacturers Association. Using a “modern era” oversize driver, and a golf tee inserted to a minimum depth as to attain stability for the golf ball, the minimum size golf tee capable of producing the correct relationship of the teed golf ball to the ideal sweet spot on the face of the driver, as shown thru robotic testing, is the 3¼″ golf tee. The 2%″ golf tee is simply not long enough to attain the proper height.
The obvious conclusion is that all the other golf tee inventions simply do not solve the problem and or help most amateur golfers because they are not buying the correct size tees to begin with.
The Exact Tee golf training system is a golf teaching and or training system and associated device and method of use, whereby each golf tee, regardless of composition or size, has a series of preset indicia or golf club select indicators and depth insertion indicator rings. These indicators are preset, as a result of scientific robotic testing, for modern era oversize golf clubs. By using visible indicia or the actual golf club name, abbreviation, number, or common grouping name or abbreviation and corresponding visible indicia or depth insertion indicator rings, to the correct height as to allow any golfer to insert the Exact Tee into the ground to the corresponding depth insertion indicator ring and corresponding club select indicator of the club they have selected and have the proper and exact alignment of a teed golf ball in relationship to the ideal contact point on the face of said golf club for optimum distance and accuracy every time. There is nothing to learn, memorize or train, just look for the visible indicia or actual golf club name or initial for the club that the player selects to hit using the Exact Tee system and insert into the ground to that depth insertion indicator ring and the golfer will have proper alignment each and every time.
As the term applies to the Exact Tee invention, visible indicia or “club select indicator(s),” simply means the golf club selected by the golfer is indicated on the shank of the Exact Tee by the golf club's actual name or abbreviation and associated depth insertion indicator ring. These visible indicia are, as the result of robotic testing, set for the optimum height of the golf ball in relationship to the ideal contact spot on the club face for the “modern era” oversize golf clubs.
For example: A golfer simply pulls the driver from the bag and inserts the Exact Tee to the depth indicated by the word “Driver' and corresponding depth insertion indicator ring. No charts, external stops, devices, no color rings to match, nothing to study or memorize.
FIGS. 9,10,11 are various indicia or Exact Tee club select indicators for all Woods, Irons, and common grouping name for Irons. The putter is excluded.
The Exact Tee is a golf tee, of any composition or size, consisting of a cap or crown, a shank or stem, and a beveled point at the opposite end of the crown or cap. (
The present invention solves the problem of a novice, untrained, high handicap golfer, aligning a golf ball, when teed, to its optimum height in relationship to the face of any golf club the golfer selects without the need for learning, training, gaining golf knowledge, or read, study, and/or memorize various inferior, inaccurate, and obsolete charts, graphs, POP displays or using additional inaccurate and obsolete external devices and or systems.
In 2004 the USGA restricted the size of golf clubs to protect the integrity of the game. For example, in 2012, of the 9 major golf club manufacturers, the size of their current oversize drivers were exactly the same at 460 cc's or the maximum allowed by the USGA. In recent years, as the result of better technology such as high speed cameras and faster high speed film as well as the robotic testing of golf clubs impacting golf balls. These technologies have worked hand in hand, with manufacturers as well as independent golf testing labs, to test the modern era oversize golf clubs to determine the optimum contact point on the face of the club, with the relationship to the golf ball when teed, for each and every golf club made to determine the maximum distance and gain better accuracy. Test results have shown that other factors such as ball spin and launch angle also factor in to determining distance and accuracy. Old formulas and myths, such as the sweet spot being in the center of the club face are simply unfounded, inaccurate, misleading, and outdated. Testing results shows this is not the ideal contact point or ideal sweet spot. The Exact Tee golf training system simply utilizes these modern technologies, and thru the testing of modern era oversize clubs, as each golf club is tested for the optimum or ideal sweet spot on the face, when the ideal contact point is found the current depth at which the golf tee is inserted in the ground is visibly marked with indicia or a depth insertion indicator ring and corresponding indicia or club select indicator(s) that would identify said golf club to any golfer by name using the unique and proprietary Legend as shown in
In addition, the visible indicia or Legend in
The Exact Tee can be of any length and of any composition, such as a biodegradable material, plastic, or wood.
The Exact Tee system is simple, easy, and accurate, unlike U.S. Patent 2005/0233838 A1 (2004) and EP 1586352 A1 (2005), by Kahl wherein a system of color coded wide bands on varying length tees and a very complex graph for the golfer to learn and or memorize and accompanying point of purchase display chart where a golfer must determine the size of the golf club heads in their bag. This system is inaccurate, obsolete, flawed, complicated, and depends on the golfers willingness to learn and or memorize inaccurate charts and or graphs. It further is designed for the head sizes of golf clubs, not each specific club, and a golfer must measure or learn the size of the head for each of their golf clubs. Even if a golfer were to do so, there is no specific reference point for each specific golf club on the golf tee, only a recommended point within a wide colored band that the golfer themselves must choose. This entire system is based on a formula to determine the center of the club face and to deem that center the sweet spot. It is this point this system wants the golfer to determine and aim for. This formula as the ideal point of contact is flawed, outdated, misleading and inaccurate, as current robotic testing has shown, that the sweet spot is not the center of the club face when factors such as launch angle and ball spin, which are in play on every golfers swing, are factored in. This invention is flawed and inaccurate.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,356,146 by Blosser (1993) attempts to use a series of 4 colored bands around the shaft of the tee. There are a series of 4 repeating colors a golfer must memorize or utilize to these bands and repeat each time to tee a golf ball to a desired height. There is no chart or graph associated with this invention to instruct or train the golfer as to the proper height for each club and which colored band to use for any specific club. This invention does not give training or instruct golfers in reference to the proper height for teeing a golf ball for each club in their bag. The golfer must gain knowledge and then use these colored bands as only a reference area and no specific point. This invention fails in training and or teaching anything to the golfer.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,717,811 by Merullo (1960) attempts to address this issue by incorporating a numbering system on the shaft of the tee and a series of stops, whereby an external device is attached to a certain numbered stop on the tee enabling a golfer to determine a desired height This is a complicated system as well as not instructing the golfer as to proper placement, but rather the golfer would have to have or gain knowledge of ball placement in relationship to the ideal sweet spot on the face for each club they have. This system does not teach or train golfers to tee the golf ball to the ideal position for each club.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,267,235 by Matias (2000) is an invention with a series of golf tees of different heights with the design such that each will stop at a predetermined height. There are only seven of these which does not address all clubs in the bag, nor does this design base any predetermined height of any tee to any specific golf club in the golfers bag. There is also no instructional marking or indications on the tees associated with this device that would indicate to a golfer that tee has been tested for that particular height and is set to the optimum height for any specific golf club the golfer may choose. Again the golfer would need to learn, test, and surmise which tee to use for some clubs as there aren't enough tees in a set for a full set of golf clubs. This invention is inaccurate and flawed.
This application claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/616,386 filed on Mar. 27, 12012, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61616386 | Mar 2012 | US |