Patent Grant
9938688
The present disclosure is directed to an excavation system and, more particularly, to an excavation system providing detection of impact between a machine and a material pile.
Heavy equipment, such as load-haul-dump machines (LHDs), wheel loaders, carry dozers, etc., are used during an excavation process to scoop up loose material from a pile at a first location (e.g., within a mine tunnel), to haul the material to a second location (e.g., to a crusher), and to dump the material. A productivity of the excavation process can be affected by an efficiency of each machine during every excavation cycle. In particular, the efficiency of each machine increases when the machine's tool (e.g., a bucket) is fully loaded with material at the pile within a short amount of time, hauled via a direct path to the second location, and quickly dumped.
Some applications require operation of the heavy equipment under hazardous working conditions. In these applications, some or all of the machines can be remotely or autonomously controlled to complete the excavation process. When a machine is remotely or autonomously controlled, however, situational awareness may be limited. That is, it can be difficult for the remote operator or the automated system to accurately determine a degree of tool engagement with the pile during the loading segment of the excavation process. As a result, the machine's tool may be underloaded during a particular loading segment, or too much energy and time may be consumed by attempting to increase loading of the tool.
One attempt to improve efficiency in the loading segment of the excavation process is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,160,783 of Shull that issued on Apr. 17, 2012 (“the '783 patent”). Specifically, the '783 patent discloses a digging control system having a controller mounted on a wheel loader and in communication with a torque sensor, a pressure sensor, and a ground speed sensor. The controller calculates loading of the wheel loader's bucket based on signals from each of the sensors. The controller then compares the bucket loading to a threshold loading. When the bucket loading exceeds the threshold loading, the controller determines that the bucket has engaged a pile of material. Upon detection of pile engagement, the controller implements automated lifting and tilting of the bucket to fill the bucket with material from the pile.
Although the digging control system of the '783 patent may improve machine efficiencies somewhat, the system may still be less than optimal. In particular, the system may be able to determine only that the pile has been engaged to some extent, but not other parameters of the pile that can affect loading of the machine's bucket.
The disclosed excavation system is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems set forth above and/or other problems of the prior art.
One aspect of the present disclosure is directed to an excavation system for a mobile machine having a work tool. The excavation system may include a speed sensor configured to generate a first signal indicative of a travel speed of the mobile machine, and at least one load sensor configured to generate a second signal indicative of loading of the work tool. The excavation system may also include a controller in communication with the speed sensor and the at least one load sensor. The controller may be configured to record values of the first signal during travel of the mobile machine toward a material, and to detect engagement of the work tool with the material based on the second signal. After engagement of the work tool with the material is detected, the controller may be further configured to determine an edge location of the material passed through by the work tool based on values of the first signal recorded prior to engagement detection of the work tool with the material.
Another aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a method of controlling a mobile machine having a work tool. The method may include sensing and recording a first parameter indicative of a travel speed of the mobile machine, and sensing at least a second parameter indicative of loading of the work tool. The method may also include detecting engagement of the work tool with a material based on a value of the at least a second parameter. After engagement of the work tool with the material is detected, the method may further include determining an edge location of the material passed through by the work tool based on values of the first parameter recorded prior to engagement detection of the work tool with the material.
Another aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a mobile machine. The mobile machine may include a frame; a plurality of wheels rotatably connected to the frame and configured to support the frame; a powertrain mounted to the frame and configured to drive the plurality of wheels; and a work tool operatively connected to the frame and having a tip configured to engage a material to be moved by the mobile machine. The mobile machine may further include a speed sensor associated with the plurality of wheels and configured to generate a first signal indicative of a travel speed of the mobile machine, a torque sensor associated with the powertrain and configured to generate a second signal indicative of a torque output of the powertrain, and an acceleration sensor configured to generate a third signal indicative of an acceleration of the mobile machine. The mobile machine may also include a controller in communication with the speed sensor, the torque sensor, and the acceleration sensor. The controller may be configured to record values of the first signal during travel of the mobile machine towards the material, to make a first comparison of values of the second signal with a torque threshold value, and to make a second comparison of values of the third signal with an acceleration threshold value. The controller may also be configured to detect engagement of the work tool with the material based on the first and second comparisons and, after engagement of the work tool with the material is detected, make a third comparison of values of the first signal recorded prior to engagement detection of the work tool with the material with a maximum speed recorded during travel of the work tool toward the material. The controller may be further configured to determine an edge location of the material passed through by the work tool based on the third comparison.
Machine 10 may include, among other things, an implement system 14 and a powertrain 16. Implement system 14 may be driven by powertrain 16 to repetitively move a work tool 18 during completion of an excavation cycle. The disclosed excavation cycle is associated with removing a pile of material 12 from inside of a mine tunnel 20. Powertrain 16, in addition to driving implement system 14, may also function to propel machine 10, for example via one or more traction devices (e.g., wheels or tracks) 22.
The disclosed implement system 14 includes a linkage structure 24 that cooperates with one or more hydraulic actuators 26 to move work tool 18. Linkage structure 24 may be pivotally connected at a first end to a frame 28 of machine 10, and pivotally connected at a second end to work tool 18. In the disclosed embodiment, hydraulic actuators 26 include a single tilt cylinder and a pair of lift cylinders connected between work tool 18, linkage structure 24, and/or frame 28 to dump/rack (i.e., tilt) and raise/lower (i.e., lift) work tool 18, respectively. It is contemplated, however, that a greater or lesser number of hydraulic actuators 26 may be included within implement system 14 and/or connected in a manner other than described above, if desired.
Powertrain 16 may be supported by frame 28, and include an engine configured to produce a rotational power output and a transmission that converts the power output to a desired ratio of speed and torque. The rotational power output may be used to drive a pump that supplies pressurized fluid to hydraulic actuators 26 and/or to one or more motors (not shown) associated with wheels 22. The engine of powertrain 16 may be a combustion engine configured to burn a mixture of fuel and air, the amount and/or composition of which directly corresponds to the rotational power output. The transmission of powertrain 16 may take any form known in the art, for example a power shift configuration that provides multiple discrete operating ranges, a continuously variable configuration, or a hybrid configuration.
Numerous different work tools 18 may be operatively attachable to a single machine 10 and driven by powertrain 16 (e.g., by the engine of powertrain 16). Work tool 18 may include any device used to perform a particular task such as, for example, a bucket, a fork arrangement, a blade, a shovel, or any other task-performing device known in the art. Although connected in the embodiment of
Machine 10 may also include one or more externally mounted sensors 32. Each sensor 32 may be a device that detects and ranges objects, for example a LIDAR (light detection and ranging) device, a RADAR (radio detection and ranging) device, a SONAR (sound navigation and ranging) device, a camera device, or another device known in the art. In one example, sensor 32 may include an emitter that emits a horizontal 2-D detection beam 33 within a zone located in front of machine 10 (i.e., in front of work tool 18), and an associated receiver that receives a reflection of that detection beam. Based on characteristics of the reflected beam, a distance and a direction from an actual sensing location of sensor 32 on machine 10 to a portion of the sensed object (e.g., to a conical pile face of material 12) within the particular zone may be determined. Sensor 32 may then generate a signal corresponding to the distance, direction, size, and/or shape of the object at the height of sensor 32, and communicate the signal to an onboard controller 34 (shown only in
Alternatively or additionally, machine 10 may be outfitted with a communication device 36 that allows communication of the sensed information to an offboard entity. For example, excavation machine 10 may communicate with a remote control operator and/or a central facility (not shown) via communication device 36. This communication may include, among other things, the location of material 12, properties (e.g., shape) of the material pile, operational parameters of machine 10, and/or control instructions or feedback.
Controller 34 may embody a single microprocessor or multiple microprocessors that include a means for monitoring operations of excavation machine 10, communicating with an offboard entity, and detecting properties of material 12. For example, controller 34 may include a memory, a secondary storage device, a clock, and a processor, such as a central processing unit or any other means for accomplishing a task consistent with the present disclosure. Numerous commercially available microprocessors can be configured to perform the functions of controller 34. It should be appreciated that controller 34 could readily embody a general machine controller capable of controlling numerous other machine functions. Various other known circuits may be associated with controller 34, including signal-conditioning circuitry, communication circuitry, and other appropriate circuitry.
Communication device 36 may include hardware and/or software that enable the sending and/or receiving of data messages through a communications link. The communications link may include satellite, cellular, infrared, radio, and any other type of wireless communications. Alternatively, the communications link may include electrical, optical, or any other type of wired communications, if desired. In one embodiment, onboard controller 34 may be omitted, and an offboard controller (not shown) may communicate directly with sensor 32, sensor 40, sensor(s) 42, and/or other components of machine 10 via communication device 36, if desired.
Travel speed sensor 40 may embody a conventional rotational speed detector having a stationary element rigidly connected to frame 28 (referring to
Load sensor 42 may be any type of sensor known in the art that is capable of generating a load signal indicative of a loading status of work tool 18. For the purposes of this disclosure, the loading status of work tool 18 may not necessarily be associated with an amount of material inside of work tool 18, as is common in the art. Instead, the loading status of work tool 18 may be associated with an amount of force passing through work tool 18, such as when work tool 18 is being pushed into or against the pile of material 12. For example, load sensor 42 may be a torque sensor 42a associated with powertrain 16, or an accelerometer 42b. When load sensor 42 is embodied as a torque sensor 42a, the load signal may correspond with a change in torque output experienced by powertrain 16 during travel of machine 10. In one embodiment, the torque sensor is physically associated with the transmission or final drive of powertrain 16. In another embodiment, the torque sensor is physically associated with the engine of powertrain 16. In yet another embodiment, the torque sensor is a virtual sensor used to calculate the torque output of powertrain 16 based on one or more other sensed parameters (e.g., fueling of the engine, speed of the engine, and/or the drive ratio of the transmission or final drive). Accelerometer 42b may embody a conventional acceleration detector rigidly connected to frame 28 in an orientation that allows sensing of fore/aft changes in acceleration of machine 10. It is contemplated that excavation system 38 may include any number and combination of load sensors 42.
Industrial Applicability
The disclosed excavation system finds potential application within any mobile machine at any worksite where it is desirable to provide tool loading assistance and/or automated control. The excavation system finds particular application within an LHD, wheel loader, or carry dozer that operate under hazardous conditions. The excavation system may assist control of the machine by automatically detecting tool engagement with a pile of material, and responsively determining a location and shape of the pile. This information may then be used for a variety of purposes including, among other things, remote and autonomous control of the work tool and/or machine. Operation of excavation system 38 will now be described in detail with reference to
Excavation system 38 may be activated at any time during forward travel of machine 10 to automatically detect engagement of work tool 18 with the pile of material 12. The auto-detection functionality may be initiated by controller 34 (Step 400) in response to a variety of input. For example, controller 34 may automatically initiate auto-detection in response to a detection of forward travel (e.g., in response to a signal from speed sensor 40). In another example, auto-detection may be initiated in response to a proximity to material 12 (e.g., in response to a signal from sensor 32). In yet another example, auto-detection may be initiated manually by a local or remote operator. Any combination of these inputs (and others) may be utilized to initiate auto-detection, as desired.
Once auto-detection of material 12 has been initiated, controller 34 may continuously monitor the travel speed of machine 10 and populate the time-based array with recorded values, monitor powertrain torque, monitor machine acceleration, and/or scan the horizon in front of machine 10 (Step 410). As described above, the travel speed may be monitored via sensor 40, the powertrain torque may be monitored via load sensor 42a, the machine acceleration may be monitored via accelerometer 42b, and the horizon may be scanned via sensor 32.
During forward travel of machine 10, when tip 30 of work tool 18 engages material 12, the speed of machine 10 will immediately begin to slow down. This slowing down may be observed by a sharp change in velocity and/or acceleration (i.e., by an increase in negative velocity or acceleration). In addition, because of the forward momentum of powertrain 16 and the increasing resistance of the material in the pile, the slowing down of machine 10 may be further observed by a sharp change in torque output of powertrain 16 (i.e., by an increase in torque output). Accordingly, controller 34 may continuously compare monitored values of torque output and/or velocity and acceleration to respective threshold values to detect the engagement of work tool 18 with material 12 (Step 420). As long as at least one of the torque output and velocity or acceleration values remains below the corresponding threshold value, control may cycle back to step 410.
However, if at step 410 both of the torque output and the velocity or acceleration values exceed the respective threshold values, controller 34 may conclude that work tool 18 has engaged the pile of material 12. At this point in time, however, controller 34 may not know how deeply tip 30 has penetrated the material pile. If remote or autonomous control were to commence based solely on the engagement knowledge, the control could be inefficient. Accordingly, controller 34 may attempt to learn more about the pile of material 12 prior to implementing a control strategy.
After detecting that work tool 18 has engaged material 12, controller 34 may filter the array of pre-recorded speed signals to determine at what location tip 30 first came into contact with a pile edge of material 12 (Step 430). That is, controller 34 may compare the different speed entries previously recorded within the time-based array to determine a maximum travel speed attained during the approach to material 12, as well as a last speed entry recorded that was within a threshold amount of about 10-20% (e.g., about 15%) of the maximum value (Step 440). The maximum value may correspond with a time confidently before work tool 18 first contacted the pile of material 12, after which the travel speed of machine 10 began to slow down. The last speed entry recorded that was with about 10-20% of the maximum value may correspond with a time confidently after, but still near the first pile contact. Controller 34 may then correlate this last speed entry with a reverse offset distance away from the location of engagement detection (i.e., with a distance traveled or a number of wheel rotations that occurred between a deceleration start point and the point of engagement detection—shown in
In some applications, knowing the edge location of the pile of material 12 may be sufficient for remote or autonomous control over machine 10 and work tool 18. However, in other applications, the repose angle α of material 12 may also be important. For example, the repose angle α may provide insight as to how material 12 may spill into work tool 18 when work tool 18 is lifted and/or tilted from its detected engagement location.
Accordingly, after completion of step 450, controller 34 may be configured to average the values obtained from sensor 32 (i.e., to average a range of the horizontal scan—see
Controller 34 may then determine the repose angle α (Step 470). Knowing the vertical height y of sensor 32 away from a ground surface of tunnel 20 (referring to
As described above, the repose angle α, along with the location of the edge of the pile of material, may be helpful in controlling machine 10. For example, these different pieces of information may provide insight about how to position and move tool 18 at different times during the forward movement of machine 10 to fill tool 18 with the most amount of material in the shortest time possible.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the excavation system of the present disclosure. Other embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the excavation system disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope being indicated by the following claims and their equivalents.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5065326 | Sahm | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5293944 | Matsumoto | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5535532 | Fujii et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5617724 | Ko | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5960378 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5968103 | Rocke | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974352 | Shull | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6205687 | Rocke | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6321153 | Rocke et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6363632 | Stentz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6615114 | Skiba et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6879899 | Budde | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7555855 | Alshaer et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7640683 | McCain | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7658234 | Brandt et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7797934 | Bacon et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7853382 | Anderson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7865285 | Price et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 8042290 | Hartwick | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8145394 | Chiorean et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8160783 | Shull | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8280596 | Hagenbuch | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8478492 | Montgomery | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8527155 | Gudat | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8654608 | Lindskov | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8726647 | Peterson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8813486 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8838329 | Seki | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8874265 | Rakshit | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8886493 | Taylor | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8903689 | Dunbabin et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 20060245896 | Alshaer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20120055051 | Polston et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20130158789 | Seki | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20140180548 | Edara | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277957 | Clar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 103292715 | Sep 2013 | CN |
| WO 2010074003 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Filla et al., “A study to compare trajectory generation algorithms for automatic bucket filling in wheel loaders,” Mar. 2014, CVT 2014 Commercial Vehicle Technology Symposium, At Kaiserslautern, Germany. |
| Magnusson et al., “Consistent Pile-Shape Quantificaiton for Autonomous Wheel Loaders,” Sep. 25-30, 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA. |
| U.S. Patent Application entitled “Excavation System Providing Automated Tool Linkage Calibration” filed on Jul. 2, 2015 by Jeffrey Graham Fletcher et al. |
| U.S. Patent Application entitled “Excavation System Providing Automated Took Linkage Calibration” filed on Jul. 2, 2015 by Jeffrey Graham Fletcher et al. |
| U.S. Patent Application entitled “Excavation System Providing Automated Stall Correction” filed on Jul. 2, 2015 by Jeffrey Graham Fletcher et al. |
| U.S. Application entitled “Excavation System Having Adaptive Dig Control” filed on Jul. 2, 2015 by Jeffrey Graham Fletcher et al. |
| U.S. Application entitled “Excavation System Having Velocity Based Work Tool Shake” filed on Jul. 2, 2015 by Jeffrey Graham Fletcher et al. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170002541 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
