A new computing machine and new mathematical concepts and methods of computing, executing and solving heretofore unknown computational problems are presented here. The computing machine, called a Dynamic Register Machine, and methods apply to hardware and software technology. The new machine and methods enable advances in machine learning, new and more powerful programming languages, and more powerful and flexible compilers and interpreters.
In Section 0, a dynamic register machine is described. In Section 9, the design of a dynamic register machine program presented in section 10 is explained. In section 10, a dynamic register machine program, called the IDRM, composed of 1590 dynamic register machine instructions is presented that can determine in a finite number of computational steps whether a given Turing machine has any immortal configurations.
Sections 1 through 8 describe and demonstrate mathematical concepts and computational methods for addressing the Turing Immortality problem and other computational problems. The Turing Immortality problem is unable to be solved by Turing machines. Furthermore, current computing machine implementations and software applications have been unable to solve this problem and other computing problems.
In the following drawings like reference numbers are used to refer to like elements. Although the following figures depict various examples of the invention, the invention is not limited to the examples depicted in the figures.
and whose vertices are labeled an, bn, cn, dn.
and whose vertices are labeled an, bn, cn, dn and shows the image of the affine map rn to the unit square. It also shows points zn, zn+1, and z.
In this section, a dynamic register machine (DRM) is presented. Then in a later section a dynamic register machine-program is demonstrated that can perform the following computation: for any Turing machine (Q, A, η) as input, the dynamic register machine program can execute method 8.36 in a finite number of computational steps. This explicit demonstration refutes the Church-Turing thesis.
The dynamic register machine is a new computing machine where its program can change while the machine is executing. While the program is being executing, new instructions may added to the program and/or instructions may be removed from the program. This computing system is an enhancement of the register machine conceived by Shepherdson & Sturgis.
The DRM has an unbounded number of registers labelled R0, R1, R2, . . . each of which contains a natural number. There are seven types of instructions. A finite sequence of instructions is a DRM program denoted as P. The formal language for the dynamic register machine is represented as S-expressions: register Rn as (R n). The contents of all of the registers may be represented as a list of natural numbers, for example (17 3 22 5 . . . ).
For each pair of natural numbers m and v, the constant instruction (C m v) stores natural number v in register (R m) i.e. the contents of register Rm=v.
For example, if the contents of the registers are (17 2 671 3 81 95 . . . ). then the instruction (C 1 55) stores 55 in register (R 1). Afterward, the contents of the registers are (17 55 671 3 81 95 . . . ).
For natural number m, the successor instruction (S m) adds 1 to register (R m).
For example, if the current state of the registers is (26 ∅ 2 678 12 78 . . . ) then the instruction (S 3) adds 1 to 678 so the register contents afterward are (26 ∅ 2 679 12 78 . . . ).
For natural numbers m, n the transfer instruction (T m n) copies the contents of register (R n) to register (R m). All other registers are left unchanged.
If the current state of the registers is (17 ∅ 2 679 3 81 . . . ) then the instruction (T ∅ 4) replaces (R ∅) containing 17 with (R 4) which is 3 so the register contents are now (3 ∅ 2 679 3 81 . . . ).
For natural numbers m, n the address instruction (A m n) copies the contents of register (R (R n)) to register (R m). All other registers are left unchanged.
If the current state of the registers is (17 ∅ 2 679 3 81 . . . ) then (R 4)=3 and (R (R 4))=679. Thus, instruction (A 5 4) replaces (R 5) containing 81 with 679. After the execution of instruction (A 5 4) the register contents are (17 ∅ 2 679 3 679 . . . ).
For natural numbers m, n, q, if the contents of register Rm equals the contents of register Rn i.e. (R m)=(R n), then the jump instruction (J m n q) causes the program execution to jump to the instruction stored in (R q) i.e. the contents of register Rq. Otherwise, if (R m)≠(R n) the next instruction following instruction (J m n q) is executed. In the special case where (R q) is beyond the last instruction in program P, then the execution of program P terminates (halts).
Starting with instruction (R m) delete the next (R n) instructions. If (R n)=0, then no instructions are deleted. If (R n)+(R m)−1 points to or beyond the last instruction of the current program P, then the execution of (D m n) deletes instruction (R m) and all of the instructions in program P that follow instruction (R m). As a consequence, execution of program P will halt if instruction (R m) precedes or immediately follows instruction (D m n).
At execution time, the update instruction (U k n q) inserts (R n) instructions at line (R q) into program P starting at register k according to the following rules:
A DRM program P is a finite sequence of instructions such that each instruction in the program is either a Successor, Constant, Transfer, Address, Jump, Update, or Delete instruction. Before DRM program execution begins, the value of every register is 0. In other words, (R k)=∅ for every k.
The instructions in the program P are referenced by the Jump, Update, or Delete instructions in the following way. At the time of dynamic register machine execution of one of these three instructions, the first instruction in P is the 0th instruction denoted as (P ∅). The next instruction, if it exists, in P is (P 1). Inductively, the next instruction after (P k), if it exists, is (P k+1).
When the program P begins execution, the 0th instruction (P ∅) is executed first, if it exists. If at some execution step program P has no instructions, then the dynamic register machine execution of program P halts. (It is possible for a Delete instruction to delete the whole program or the initial program P may be empty.)
Inductively, if the kth instruction, (P k), is being executed and it is not a Jump, Update, or Delete instruction, then the next instruction executed is (P k+1). If the instruction (P k+1) does not exist, the dynamic register machine execution of program P halts.
If (P k) is being executed and (P k)=(J m n q) then (R m) and (R n) are compared. If (R m)≠(R n) then the next instruction executed, if it exists, is (P k+1). If (P k+1) does not exist, then execution of program P halts.
If (R m)=(R n) then the next instruction executed, if it exists, is (P (R q)). In other words, instruction (P j) is executed where j=(R q). If (P j) does not exist, then execution of program P halts.
Before presenting the rules that describe the execution of the Delete and Update instructions, the simplest way to understand the deletion and insertion of instructions is that execution of the program P behaves like a linked list of instructions. If one or more instructions are deleted from the linked list Pold, then the instruction executed next is the one that immediately follows—in the sense of the new linked list Pnew—the previous instruction (D m n)=(Pold k) executed in Pold. If one or more instructions are inserted into the linked list Pold, then the instruction executed next is the one that immediately follows—in the sense of the new linked list Pnew—the previous instruction (U m n q)=(Pold k) that was executed.
A dynamic register machine example is presented first that illustrates the linked list behavior of the Delete and Update instructions. Then the formal rules are presented for determining the next instruction that is executed after a Delete or Update instruction.
The program begins execution with the instruction (P ∅) which is (C ∅ 2). The third column headed by Program Comments describes the results of executing that instruction. After instruction (T 6 5), executes, the contents of the registers is (2 ∅ 4 ∅ ∅ 2 2 ∅ ∅ . . . ).
Before instruction (A 7 5) executes, (R 5)=2 and (R 2)=4. Thus, the execution of (A 7 5) sets (R 7)=4. After instruction (A 7 5) executes, the contents of the registers are (2 ∅ 4 ∅ ∅ 2 2 4 ∅ ∅ . . . ).
After instruction (C 3 9) executes, the contents of the registers are (2 ∅ 4 9 ∅ 2 2 4 3 ∅ ∅ . . . ). Thus, when the instruction (U 5 ∅ 5) executes (R 5)=2, (R ∅)=2, (R 6)=2, (R 7)=4, and (R 8)=3 Thus, two instructions are inserted at (P 2) where they are determined starting at register 5. Since (R 5)=2, the first inserted instruction is a transfer instruction. Since (R 6)=2 and (R 7)=4 the first inserted instruction is (T 2 4). Since register 7 completes the first inserted instruction, (R 8)=3 determines that the second inserted instruction is an address instruction. The second inserted instruction is (A ∅ ∅) because (R 9)=(R 1∅)=∅.
After instruction (U 5 ∅ 5) has executed, the next instruction executed is (3 2 5 2). The table on the following page shows program P before it executes instruction (3 2 5 2) and after it has been updated by the execution of instruction (U 5 ∅ 5):
When instruction (J 2 5 2) is executed, 4=(R 2)≠(R 5)=2 so the next instruction executed is (D 3 2). Since (R 2)=4 and (R 3)=9, four instructions are deleted from program P starting at instruction (P 9). As a result, instructions (C 3 9), (U 5 ∅ 5), (J 2 5 2), and (D 3 2) are deleted from program P and the current program is shown in the following table after (D 3 2) is executed:
The next instruction executed is (C ∅ 17). After instruction (S ∅) is executed, there are no more instructions that follow (S ∅), so the program execution halts. The final program is the same as in the previous table. When the program execution halts, the content of the registers is (18 ∅ 4 9 ∅ 2 2 4 3 ∅ . . . )
If (Pold k) is being executed and (Pold k)=(D m n), then there are three cases for determining the next instruction that is executed. To define the three cases, it is first determined whether the execution of the delete command deletes itself—the kth instruction from Pold. The formal conditions for this to be true is that (R m)≦k<(R m)+(R n). If this condition is true, then CASE A shown below determines the next instruction that is executed.
If (Pold k) is being executed and (Pold k)=(U m n q), then there are three cases for determining the next instruction that is executed. To define the three cases, before (U m n q) is executed, consider the instruction (Pold k+1) the instruction that immediately follows (Pold k) in program Pold right before the instructions are inserted.
The linear maps L and M are represented with matrices in the standard basis.
Each affine transformation is of the form
where L or
is called the linear part and
is called the translational part. The unit square with lower left corner at coordinate (j, k) is denoted as U(j, k)={(x, y): j≦x≦j+1 & k≦y≦k+1} or it is sometimes represented with the corners of the square [(j, k), (j+1, k), (j+1, k+1), (j, k+1)].
Consider affine maps
Then,
An affine transformation r is called an rectangular area-preserving affine transformation if it is of the form
for some A>0. In the next section, A is a number of the form Bk, where k is an integer and B is an integer greater than 1, and m, n are rational numbers.
Rectangular area preserving affine maps are closed under function composition.
Consider
Then
If bc+(1−a)(d−1)≠0 then
has a fixed point at
When b=c=0 and (1−a)(d−1)≠0, then
has a fixed point at
Consider rectangular area preserving affine map
where A>1 and with square domain W=[(u, v), (u+s, v), (u+s, v+s), (u, v+s)] with sides of length s. r(W) vertically covers W if and only if all four conditions hold:
The geometry of a vertical cover is shown in
When a=1/A and d=A such that A>1, then
has a fixed point at
On square W=[(0,0), (s,0), (s,s), (0,s)], the image of affine map r on W is
which is a rectangle with width
and height sA.
Consider the rectangular area preserving affine map
where A>1 and with square domain W=[(u, v), (u+s, v), (u+s, v+s), (u, v+s)] with sides of length s. r(W) horizontally covers W if and only if all four conditions hold:
The geometry of a horizontal cover is shown in
When a=A and
such that A>1, then
has a fixed point
On square W=[(0, 0), (s, 0), (s, s), (0, s)]
is a rectangle with width sA and height
with Standard Unit Square U(0, 0).
The fixed point
is not in −U(0,0). The geometry is shown in
Consider the rectangular, area-preserving affine map
for some A>1 and square domain W=[(u, v), (u+s, v), (u+s, v+s) (u, v+s)]. Then r(W) vertically covers W if and only if fixed point
lies in W.
Proof.
Define
to translate W so that W is a square of sides with length s with lower left corner at the origin. Thus, without loss of generality, it suffices to verify it for domain W=[(0, 0), (s, 0), (s, s), (0, s)]. Observe that r(0, 0)=(m, n) and
The geometry is shown in
Consider the rectangular, area-preserving affine map
for some A>1 and square W=[(u, v), (u+s, v), (u+s, v+s) (u, v+s)]. Then r(W) horizontally covers W if and only if fixed point
lies in W.
Proof.
Define
to translate W so that W is the square with lower left corner at the origin. Thus, without loss of generality, it suffices to verify it for W=[(0, 0), (s, 0), (s, s), (0, s)]. Observe
The geometry is shown in
Let {ƒ1, ƒ2, . . . , ƒI} be a set of functions. Then a function index sequence is a function S: →{1, 2, . . . , I}. If p is a point, then the orbit with respect to this function index sequence is [p, ƒS(1)(p), ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), . . . , ƒS(m)ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), . . . ]. Square brackets indicate that the order matters. Sometimes the first few functions will be listed in a function sequence when it is periodic. For example, [ƒ, g, ƒ, g, . . . ] is written when formally this function sequence is S: →{ƒ, g} where S(n)=ƒ when n is odd and S(n)=g when n is even.
on domain U(0, 0) and
on U(4, 0)
(0, 0) is a fixed point of g ƒ. The orbit of any point p chosen from the horizontal segment connected by the points (0, 0) and (1, 0) with respect to the function sequence [ƒ, g, ƒ, g, . . . ] is a subset of U(0, 0)∪U(4, 0). The point p is called an immortal point. The orbit of a point Q outside this segment exits (halts) U(0, 0)∪U(4, 0).
Let P denote the two dimensional x, y plane. Suppose ƒk: Uk→P is a function for each k such that whenever j≠k, then Uj∩Uk=Ø. For any point p in the plane P an orbit may be generated as follows. The 0th iterate of the orbit is p. Given the kth iterate of the orbit is point q, if point q does not lie in any Uk, then the orbit halts. Otherwise, q lies in at least one Uj. Inductively, the k+1 iterate of q is defined as ƒj(q). If p has an orbit that never halts, this orbit is called an immortal orbit and p is called an immortal point. If p has an orbit that halts, this orbit is called a halting orbit and p is called a halting point.
Let p=(p1, p2) and let q=(q1, q2) be two points in P. The x and y coordinate functions are defined as x: P×P→P such that x(p1, p2)=p1 and y: P×P→P where y(p1, p2)=p2. The Euclidean metric is d: P×P→R+ where Affine Maps,
A Turing machine is a triple (Q, A, η) where
The η function acts as the program for the Turing machine in the following manner. For each q in Q and α in A, the expression η(q, α)=(r, β, x) describes how machine (Q, A, η) executes one computational step. When in state q and scanning alphabet symbol α on the tape:
The Turing machine tape T is represented as a function T: Z→A where Z denotes the integers. The tape T is M-bounded if there exists a bound M>0 such that for T(k)=#, where a1=#, whenever |k|>M. The symbol on the kth square of the tape is denoted as Tk.
Let (Q, A, η) be a Turing machine with tape T. A configuration is an element of the set ζ=(Q∪{h})×Z×{T: T is tape with range A}. The standard definition of a Turing machine assumes the initial tape is M-bounded and the tape contains only blank symbols, denoted as #, outside the bound. See [LEWIS].
If (q, k, T) is a configuration in ζ, then k is called the tape head location. The tape head location is M-bounded if there exists a natural number M>0 such that the tape head location k satisfies |k|≦M. A configuration whose first coordinate equals h is called a halted configuration. The set of non-halting configurations is N={(q, k, T)ε: q≠h}
The purpose of the definition of a configuration is that the first coordinate stores the current state of the Turing machine, the third coordinate stores the contents of the tape, and the second coordinate stores the location of the tape head on the tape. Before presenting some examples of configurations, it is noted that there are different methods to describe the tape contents. One method is
This is a max {|l|, |n|}-bounded tape. Another convenient representation is to list the tape contents and underline the symbol to indicate the location of the tape head. ( . . . ##αβ## . . . ).
A diagram shown in
Consider configuration (p, 2, . . . ##αβ## . . . ). The first coordinate indicates that the Turing machine is in state p. The second coordinate indicates that its tape head is currently scanning tape square 2, denoted as T2 or T(2). The third coordinate indicates that tape square 1 contains symbol α, tape square 2 contains symbol β, and all other tape squares contain the # symbol.
A second example of a configuration is (1, 6, . . . 1111233111 . . . ). This configuration is a halted configuration. The first coordinate indicates that the machine is in halt state 1. The second coordinate indicates that the tape head is scanning tape square 6. The underlined 2 in the third coordinate indicates that the tape head is currently scanning a 2. In other words, T(6)=2, T(7)=3, T(8)=3, and T(k)=1 when k<6 OR k>8.
Given Turing machine (Q, A, η) with configuration (q, k, T) such that T(k)=α. After the execution of one computational step, the new configuration is one of the three cases such that for all three cases Tnew(k)=β and Tnew(j)=T(j) whenever j≠k:
The program symbol η is overloaded as η: N→ζ where η(q, k, T)=(r, k−1, Tnew) when η(q, α)=(r, β, L) and η(q, k, T)=(r, k+1, Tnew) when η(q, α)=(r, β, R). See 2.14, 2.17.
If Turing machine (Q, A, η) with initial configuration (s, k, T) reaches the halt state h after a finite number of execution steps, then the machine execution halts. Otherwise, it is said that the machine execution is immortal on initial configuration (s, k, T).
The program length is the number of elements in the domain of η. The program length is denoted as |η|. Observe that |η|=|Q×A|=|Q∥A|. In [TURING] and [DAVIS], they omit quintuples (q, a, r, b, x) when r is the halting state. In the representation shown here, η(q, a)=(1, b, x) or η(q, a)=(h, b, x).
Suppose the alphabet A={a1, a2, . . . , aJ} and the states are Q={q1, q2, . . . , qK}. Define the symbol value function v: A∪Q∪{h}→N where N denotes the natural numbers.
Choose the number base B=|Q|+|A|+1. Observe that 0≦v(x)<B and that each symbol chosen from A∪Q∪{h} has a unique value in base B.
Two Turing machines M1(Q1, A1, η1, s1) and M2(Q2, A2, η2, s2) have a program isomorphism denoted as Ψ: M1→M2 if
If alphabet A={a}, then the halting behavior of the Turing machine is completely determined in ≦|Q|+1 execution steps.
Proof.
Suppose Q={q1, q2, . . . qK}. Observe that the program length is |η|=|Q|. Also, after an execution step every tape symbol on the tape must be a. Consider the possible execution steps: η(qS(1), a)→η(qS(2), a)→η(qS(3), a) . . . η(qS(k+1), a). If the program execution does not halt in these |Q|+1 steps, then S(i)=S(j) for some i≠j; and the tape contents are still all a′s. Thus, the program will exhibit periodic behavior whereby it will execute η(qS(i), a)→ . . . →η(qS(j), a) indefinitely. If the program does not halt in |Q|+1 execution steps, then the program will never halt.
As a result of Remark 2.10, from now on, it is assumed that |A|≧2. Further, since at least one state is needed, then from here on, it is assumed that the base B≧3.
See
where this sequence in base B represents a real number as
Define function φ: Π→P as φ(q, k, T)=(x(q, k, T), y(q, k, T)) where ø is the set of non-halting configurations defined in 2.3. φ will be used in 2.14 and 2.17.
The unit square U(└x┘, └y┘) has a lower left corner with coordinates (└x┘, └y┘) where
└x┘=Bv(tk)+v(Tk+1) and └y┘=Bv(q)+v(Tk−1)
This is for case −I, where −η(q, Tk)=(r, β, L).
xTk−1β·Tk+1Tk+2Tk+3 . . .
B−1x=Tk·Tk+1Tk+2Tk+3Tk+4
Thus, m=Tk−1β−Tk where the subtraction of integers is in base B.
yTk−2β·Tk−3Tk−4Tk−5 . . .
By=qTk−1Tk−2·Tk−3Tk−4Tk−5 . . .
Thus, n=rTk−2−qTk−1Tk−2 where the subtraction of integers is in base B.
Define the left affine function F(└x┘, └y┘): U(└x┘, └y┘)→P where
Let (q, k, T) be a Turing machine configuration. Suppose η(q, Tk)=(r, b, L) for some state r in Q∪{h} and some alphabet symbol b in A and where Tk=a. Consider the next Turing Machine computational step. The new configuration is (r, k−1, Tb) where Tb(j)=T(j) for every j≠k and Tb(k)=b. The commutative diagram φη(q, k, T)=F(└x┘, └y┘)φ(q, k, T) holds.
In other words, F(└x┘, └y┘)[x(q, k, T), y(q, k, T)]=[x(r, k−1, Tb), y(r, k−1, Tb)].
Proof.
x(r,k−1,Tb)=Tk−1b·Tk+1Tk+2 . . .
The x coordinate of
The y coordinate of
As in 2.13, n is the vertical translation. |Bv(r)−Bv(Tk−1)|=B|v(r)−v(Tk−1)|≦B(B−1) Since q is a state, v(q)≧(|A|+1). This implies |−B2v(q)|≧(|A|+1)B2 This implies that |n|≧(|A|+1)B2−B(B−1)≧|A|B2+B. Thus, |n|≧|A|B2+B.
This is for case II, where η(q, Tk)=(r, β, R).
xTk+1Tk+2·Tk+3Tk+4 . . .
Bx=TkTk+1Tk+2·Tk+3Tk+4 . . .
Thus, m=Tk+1Tk+2−TkTk+1Tk+2 where the subtraction of integers is in base B.
yrβ·Tk−1Tk−2Tk−3 . . .
B−1y=q·Tk−1Tk−2Tk−3 . . .
Thus, n=rβ−q where the subtraction of integers is in base B. Define the right affine function G(└x┘, └y┘): U(└x┘, └y┘)→P such that
where m=−B2v(Tk) and n=Bv(r)+v(β)−v(q).
Let (q, k, T) be a Turing machine configuration. Suppose η(q, Tk)=(r, b, R) for some state r in Q∪{h} and some alphabet symbol b in A and where Tk=a. Consider the next Turing Machine computational step. The new configuration is (r, k+1, Tb) where Tb(j)=T(j) for every j≠k and Tb(k)=b. The commutative diagram φη(q, k, T)=G(└x┘, └y┘)φ(q, k, T) holds.
In other words, G(└x┘, └y┘)[x(q, k, T), y(q, k, T)]=[x(r, k+1, Tb), y(r, k+1, Tb)].
Proof.
From η(q, Tk)=(r, b, R), it follows that x(r, k+1, Tb)=Tk+1Tk+2·Tk+3Tk+4 . . .
The x coordinate of
From η(q, Tk)=(r, b, R), it follows that y(r, k+1, Tb)=rb·Tk−1Tk−2Tk−3 . . .
The y coordinate of
First
Consider Turing machine (Q, A, η) with initial tape configuration (s, 0, T). WLOG, it is assumed that the machine begins executing with the tape head at 0th position of the tape. Let ƒ1, ƒ2, . . . , ƒI denote the I affine functions with corresponding unit square domains W1, W2, W3, . . . , WI determined from 2.11, 2.12, 2.13 and 2.16. Let p=(x(s, 0, T), y(s, 0, T)). From 2.11,
There is a 1 to 1 correspondence between the mth point of the orbit [p, ƒS(1)(p), ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), . . . , ƒS(m)ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), . . . ]
and the mth computational step of the Turing machine (Q, A, η) with initial configuration (s, 0, T). In particular, the Turing Machine halts on initial configuration (s, 0, T) if and only if p is a halting point with respect to affine functions ƒk: Wk→P where 1≦k≦I. Dually, the Turing Machine is immortal on initial configuration (s, 0, T) if and only if p is an immortal point with respect to affine functions ƒk: Wk→P where 1≦k≦I.
Proof.
From lemmas 2.14, 2.17, definition 2.11 and remark 2.12, every computational step of (Q, A, η) on current configuration (q, k, T′) corresponds to the application of one of the unique affine maps ƒk, uniquely determined by remark 2.12 and definitions 2.13, 2.16 on the corresponding point p=[x(r, k, T′), y(r, k, T′)]. Thus by induction, the correspondence holds for all n if the initial configuration (s, 0, T) is an immortal configuration which implies that [x(s, 0, T), y(s, 0, T)] is an immortal point. Similarly, if the initial configuration (s, 0, T) is a halting configuration, then the machine (Q, A, η) on (s, 0, T) halts after N computational steps. For each step, the correspondence implies that the orbit of initial point p0=[x(s, 0, T), y(s, 0, T)] exits
on the Nth iteration of the orbit. Thus, p0 is a halting point.
With respect to Turing machine (Q, A, η), the two configurations (q, k, T) and (q, j, V) are translation equivalent if T(m)=V(m+j−k) for every integer m.
Proof.
Suppose p=[x(q, k, T), y(q, k, T)] with respect to (Q, A, η) and p lies in
such that ƒS(N)ƒS(N−1) . . . ƒS(1)(p)=p. Starting with configuration (q, k, T), after N execution steps of (Q, A, η), the resulting configuration (q, j, V) satisfies x(q, k, T)=x(q, j, V) and y(q, k, T)=y(q, j, V) because of ƒS(N)ƒS(N−1) . . . ƒS(1)(p)=p and Theorem 2.19. This implies that (q, k, T) is translation equivalent to (q, j, V).
By induction this argument may be repeated indefinitely. Thus, (q, k, is an immortal configuration such that for every N computational steps of (Q, A, η), the kth resulting configuration (q, jk, Vk) is translation equivalent to (q, k, T).
Two affine functions with adjacent unit squares as their respective domains are either both right affine or both left affine functions. (Adjacent unit squares have lower left x and y coordinates that differ at most by 1. It is assumed that |Q|≧2, since any Turing program with only one state has a trivial halting behavior that can be determined in |A| execution steps when the tape is bounded.)
Proof.
From 2.12, the unit square U(└x┘, └y┘) has a lower left corner with coordinates (└x┘, └y┘) where └x┘=Bv(Tk)+v(Tk+1) and └y┘=Bv(q)+v(Tk−1). A left or right affine function (left or right move) is determined by the state q and the current tape square Tk. If states q≠r, then |Bv(q)−Bv(r)|≧B. If two alphabet symbols a, b are distinct, then |v(a)−v(b)|<|A|.
Thus, if two distinct program instructions have different states q≠r, then the corresponding unit squares have y-coordinates that differ by at least B−|A|=|Q|≧2, since any Turing program with just one state has trivial behavior that can be determined in |A| execution steps when the tape is bounded. Otherwise, two distinct program instructions must have distinct symbols at Tk. In this case, the corresponding unit squares have x-coordinates that differ by at least B−|A|=|Q|≧2.
Let ƒ1, ƒ2, . . . , ƒI denote the I affine functions with corresponding unit square domains W1, W2, WI. Let p be a point in the plane P with orbit [p, ƒS(1)(p), ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), . . . , ƒS(m)ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), . . . ]. Then the orbit of p has rationally bounded coordinates if the x and y coordinates are rational for every point in the orbit and if there exists a natural number M such that for every point, ƒS(k)ƒS(k−1) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), when the x and y coordinates are expressed in reduced form M divides the denominator of each coordinate.
An Orbit with Rationally Bounded Coordinates is Periodic or Halting.
Proof.
Suppose both coordinates are rationally bounded for the whole orbit and M is the natural number. If one point in the orbit exits
then the proof is completed. It is a halting orbit. Otherwise, consider the first R M2+1 points of the orbit. Since there are most M2 points in a unit square with coordinates that are rationally bounded by integer M, then two distinct points in the orbit must be the same. Thus, the orbit is periodic.
An Orbit with Unbounded Coordinates is an Immortal Orbit that is not Periodic, where it is Assumed that the Initial Tape is Bounded.
Proof.
If the orbit halts, then the orbit has a finite number of points. Thus, it must be an immortal orbit. This orbit can not be periodic because the coordinates are rationally unbounded.
An unbounded machine execution corresponds to an immortal orbit.
If the Turing Machine execution is unbounded on the right half of the tape, then in regard to the corresponding affine orbit, there is a subsequence S(1), S(2), . . . , S(k), . . . of the indices of the function sequence g1, g2, . . . , gk, . . . such that for each natural number n the composition of functions gS(n)g(n−1) . . . gS(1) iterated up to the s(n)th orbit point is of the form
where ms(n), ts(n) are rational numbers.
If the Turing Machine execution is unbounded on the left half of the tape, then in regard to the corresponding affine orbit, there is a subsequence S(1), S(2), . . . , S(k), . . . of the indices of the function sequence g1, g2, . . . , gk, . . . such that for each natural number n the composition of functions gS(n)gS(n−1) . . . gS(1) iterated up to the s(n)th orbit point is of the form:
where ms(n), ts(n) are rational numbers.
Suppose that the Turing Machine (Q, A, η) begins or continues execution with a configuration such that tape and tape head location are both M-bounded during the next (2M+1)|Q∥A|2M+1+1 execution steps. Then the Turing Machine program halts in at most (2M+1)|Q∥A|2M+1+1 execution steps or its corresponding orbit is periodic with period less than or equal to (2M+1)|Q∥A|2M+1+1
Proof.
If the program halts in (2M+1)|Q∥A|2M+1+1 steps, then the proof is completed. Otherwise, consider the first (2M+1)|Q∥A|2M+1+1 steps. After each of these computational steps, the tape contents T(k) at square k are blank whenever |k|>M. There are a maximum of |Q| |A| program commands for each tape head location. There are a maximum of (2M+1) tape head locations. For each of the remaining 2M non-blank tape squares, each square can have at most |A| different symbols, which means a total of |A|2M possibilities for these tape squares. Thus, in the first (2M+1)|Q∥A|2M+1+1 points of the corresponding orbit in P, there are at most distinct (2M+1)|Q∥A|2M+1 points so at least one point in the orbit must occur more than once.
The initial tape contents are all #'s. Formally, T(k)=# for every integer k. Base B=|Q|+|A|+1=7. For this example, as defined in 2.8, the value function v: A∪Q∪{h}→N is defined as v(h)=0 v(#)=1 v(a)=2 v(b)=3 v(q0)=4 v(q1)=5 v(q2)=6.
In regard to the affine orbit and Turing Machine execution correspondence, the affine functions ƒj and unit square domains Wj, the current Turing Machine state, tape head and tape are shown after each execution step. The location of the tape head is indicated by underlining the tape symbol and placing the state of the machine directly underneath this tape square.
is a non-periodic cluster point that corresponds to the machine being in state q1 and the tape head location is at square 1 and the tape contents are T(k)=a whenever k≦1 and T(k)=b whenever k>1.
is a cluster point of the immortal orbit that corresponds to the machine being in state q1 and the tape head location can be at any square j and the tape contents are T(k)=a for every k on the tape. Observe that v is a fixed point of
lying in the interior of the unit square W14=[(16, 37), (17, 37), (17, 38), (16, 38)].
Observe that if
which is when the tape head is at 0; the machine is in state q1; and T(0−1)=T(0)=T(0+1)=a. Then v0 is in this immortal orbit.
Set v1=to the first time the point in the immortal orbit has its tape head at 4; and the machine is in state q0; and T(−1−2)=T(−1−1)=T(−1)=T(−1+1)=T(−1+2)=a.
By induction, for every k>1, set vk=to the first time the point in the immortal orbit has its tape head at k; the machine is in state q0; and T(−k+j)=a for every j such that |j|≦k+1. This implies
Observe that
has fixed point
See
Observe that
is a cluster point of the immortal orbit that corresponds to the machine being in state q0 and the tape head location can be at any square j and the tape contents are T(k)=b for every k on the tape.
Observe that w is a fixed point of
lying in the interior of the unit square W8=[(24, 31), (25, 31), (25, 32), (24, 32)]. Also, observe that if
which is when the tape head is at 3; and the machine is in state q0; and T(3−1)=T(3)=T(3+1)=b, then w3 is in this immortal orbit.
Set W4 equal to the first time the point in the immortal orbit has its tape head at 4; and the machine is in state q0; and T(4−2)=T(4−1)=T(4)=T(4+1)=T(4+2)=b.
By induction, for every k>4, set wk=to the first time the point in the immortal orbit has its tape head at k; and the machine is in state q0; and T(k+j)=b for every j such that |j|≦k−2. Observe that
Different notations are introduced that represent a point corresponding to a Turing machine configuration. The coordinates of the point are not dependent on the integer value of the tape head with respect to the tape. For this reason, in these different notations, the position of the tape head is located without indicating the integer value of the tape head.
The expression p=[3, w12v] represents point p where the current state of the machine is 3; the tape head points to a tape square containing a 1; the tape square adjacent to the right of the tape head contains a 2; the remainder of the tape squares to the right of this 2 are represented by a variable v which may represent an arbitrary sequence of alphabet symbols on the right side of the tape; and the remainder of the tape squares to the left of the tape head are represented by a variable w which may represent an arbitrary sequence of alphabet symbols on the left side of the tape.
To express the configuration at a computational step, 3 1111222 represents that the machine is in state 3, the tape head is located at the underlined 1 and there are 2's to the right of the tape head and 1's to the left of the tape head. If a sequence of symbols is overlined then that means the remainder of the tape squares contain that periodic pattern. For example, p=[3,
The following examples demonstrate simple immortal periodic points.
The tape head moves for this non-hyperbolic immortal periodic point are {RLRL}n. All points p=[3, w22v] are non-hyperbolic immortal periodic points with period C=4. Program 1034 does not have any hyperbolic immortal periodic points.
The tape head moves for this immortal periodic point are {RLLRR}n where n is a positive integer. Point p=[3,
The point p=[2,
Machine execution steps with tape head initially at tape square 1. Tape head location is indicated by underline.
The tape head moves are (R6LR)n. The point p=[q,
Suppose the Turing machine (Q, A, η) has an immortal periodic point p. If the machine starts its execution at point p, then the minimal number of computational steps, denoted C(p), for the machine to return to point p is called the computational period of p. Observe that the computational period C(p) is the same number as the period of p with respect to the corresponding affine maps ƒk: Wk→P where 1≦k≦I.
Hyperbolic Degree m(p)=|R|−|L| and C(p)=|R|+|L|
If p is an immortal periodic point with computational period C(p), then C(p)=|R|+|L| where |R| denotes the number of right tape head moves during these C(p) computational steps and |L| denotes the number of left tape head moves during these C(p) computational steps. From section 2, let ƒS(C) ƒS(C−1) . . . ƒS(1) be the corresponding sequence of affine maps. Then the linear part of ƒS(C) ƒS(C−1) . . . ƒS(1) has the form
where m=|R|−|L|. When it is understood which immortal periodic point is referred to, then the argument p is omitted and m denotes the hyperbolic degree and C denotes the computational period.
Consider affine map r with linear part of the form
for some integer m≠0. If m>0, then r is called an m degree right shift hyperbolic map. If m<0, then r is called an m degree left shift hyperbolic map.
A pattern W is a finite sequence of alphabet symbols chosen from A. In other words, W: {0, 1, . . . , n−1}→A. The length of W=n and is denoted as |W|=n. The kth element of the pattern W is denoted as W(k) or wk. Thus, pattern W is sometimes explicitly expressed as w0 w1 . . . w−1. S is a subpattern of W if S=wj w1+1 . . . wk−1 wk for some j and k satisfying 0≦j≦k≦n−1 and the length of S=k−j+1. In computer science, sometimes S is called a substring. S is a left subpattern if j=0 and a right subpattern if k=n−1.
The positive integer m divides pattern W if the length of W=rm for some positive integer r and all of the following hold:
W(0)=W(m)= . . . =W((r−1)m)
. . .
W(j)=W(m+j)= . . . =W((r−1)m+j)
. . .
W(m−1)=W(2m−1)= . . . =W(rm−1)
More formally, for every non-negative integer j satisfying 0≦j≦m−1 and for every positive integer k satisfying 1≦k≦r−1, then W(j)=W(1+km).
Set pattern W=01 0010. The length of W equals 6. The integer 3 divides W.
T=0100 is a left subpattern of W. U=010 is a right subpattern of W.
Set pattern V=11 0101. The length of V equals 6. V is divisible by 6 but has no smaller divisors. The set of all subpatterns of V that have length 5={11010, 10101}
Turing tape T is left periodic with left period a with respect to tape square k if α is the smallest positive integer such that for each j satisfying 0≦j<α, then for every positive integer m, T(k−j−mα)=T(k−j). Turing tape T is right periodic with right period β with respect to square k if β is the smallest positive integer such that for each j satisfying 0≦j<β, then for every positive integer m, T(k+j+mβ)=T(k+j). A tape is left-right (α, γ, β) periodic if the tape is left periodic with period α respect to tape square k and right periodic with period β respect to tape square (k+γ+1) for some non-negative integer γ. Observe that in general α≠β.
The sequence of α tape symbols T(k−α+1) T(k−α+2) . . . T(k) is called the left pattern. When γ>0, the tape sequence T(k+1) . . . T(k+γ) is called the middle pattern. When γ=0, the middle pattern is called the empty pattern. The sequence of tape symbols T(k+γ+1) T(k+γ+2) . . . T(k+γ+β) is called the right pattern.
Below the left-right periodic tape has a left period α=1 and a right period β=1. The left pattern is 0. The middle pattern is 1. The right pattern is 1.
Below the left-right periodic tape has a left period α=3 and right period β=4. The left pattern is 001. The middle pattern is 10. The right pattern is 1001.
Suppose a Turing machine begins or continues its execution with tape head at tape square k. During the next N computational steps, the greatest lower bound λ of the tape head is the left most (smallest integer) tape square that the tape head visits during these N computational steps; and the least upper bound μ of the tape head is the right most (largest integer) tape square that the tape head visits during these N computational steps. The window of execution denoted as [λ, μ] or [λ, λ+1, . . . , μ−1, μ] is the sequence of integers representing the tape squares that the tape head visited during these N computational steps. The length of the window of execution is μ−λ+1 which is also the number of distinct tape squares visited by the tape head during these N steps. To express the window of execution for the next n computational steps, the lower and upper bounds are expressed as a function of n: [λ(n), μ(n)].
This follows immediately from the definition of the window of execution.
Since the tape squares may be renumbered without changing the results of the machine execution, for convenience it is often assumed that the machine starts execution at tape square 0. In example 3.6, during the next 8 computational steps—one cycle of the immortal periodic point—the window of execution is [0, 6]. The length of the window of execution is 7.
Observe that if the tape squares are renumbered and the goal is to refer to two different windows of execution, for example [λ(j), μ(j)] and [λ(k), μ(k)], then both windows are renumbered with the same relative offset so that the two windows can be compared.
Let p=[q,
Thus, p is of the form [q, w aL(p) . . . ai . . . aU(p) v] such that
Any hyperbolic periodic point has a Left-Right Periodic Tape. And the left period and the right period of the tape each divide the degree of the hyperbolicity.
Proof.
If it is a right-shift hyperbolic periodic point, then there is a point p and an affine map r with linear part
such that r(p)=p. From the Turing/Affine correspondence theorem, r(p) corresponds to m net moves of the tape head to the right.
The point p corresponds to the following configuration where the tape head is at square k and the machine is also in state q:
The point r(p) corresponds to the following configuration where the tape head is at square k+m and the machine is also in state q:
r(p)=p implies that T(k+m)=T(k) for every integer k. If it is a left-shift hyperbolic periodic point, there is a point p and an affine map r with linear part
such that r(p)=p. From the Turing/Affine correspondence theorem, r(p) corresponds to m net moves of the tape head to the left and r(p)=p implies that T(k+m)=T(k) for every integer k.
If hyperbolic immortal periodic point p has hyperbolic degree m>0, then the right pattern of p, is a right subpattern of the spanning middle pattern of p.
If hyperbolic immortal periodic point p has hyperbolic degree m<0, then the left pattern of p, is a left subpattern of the spanning middle pattern of p.
The purpose of this section is to show that every immortal orbit, induced by an immortal Turing configuration, has a subsequence that converges to an immortal periodic point.
Proof.
Let ε>0. Let ƒ1, ƒ2, . . . , ƒI denote the I affine functions with corresponding unit square domains W1, W2, W3, WI. Let p be an immortal point. Then its orbit
The area of
equals I. There exists a natural number N such that
Consider the first I(N2+1) points of this orbit. Then at least N2+1 points of the orbit must lie in at least one of these unit squares Wk. This implies that there are two points from the orbit in unit square Wk with the distance between them less than or equal to
Let {pn}n=1∞ be a sequence of points and d a metric. The point q is a cluster point of {pn}n=1∞ if for any ε>0 and for any N, there exists m≧N such that d(q, pm)<ε.
Let
U is called the set of immortal points with respect to Turing machine (Q, A, η).
Suppose
and for each n, pn, lies in U(Q, A, η). Then p is an immortal point.
Proof.
Since
a subsequence qn of pn may be constructed with the property that
This means the corresponding tape of p and the corresponding tape of qn are the same for the first n symbols on the tape in both directions.
By reductio absurdum, suppose p is not an immortal point. Then execution of (Q, A, η) on p halts at the Nth execution step for some natural number N. Since each computational step of (Q, A, η) moves either one tape square to the left or to the right, this means that execution of (Q, A, η) on p must halt on some tape symbol ak or bk such that k≦N. Assuming execution begins at tape square 0 or renumbering if necessary: this means that (Q, A, η) starting at point p must halt before moving to the right of tape square N or to the left of tape square −N. Consider point qN+2. By assumption, qN+2 is immortal but the first N+2 execution steps of (Q, A, η) on qN+2 and p must be the same because their tape symbols agree in both directions for at least the first N+2 tape squares. This is a contradiction: p halts on execution step N and qN+2 does not halt on step N. Thus, p must be an immortal point.
Every point in an immortal orbit and all cluster points lie in the interior of
Each point is a distance at least
from the boundary of every Wk.
Proof.
Consider a non-halting Turing machine execution. After every execution step, the state in the machine configuration is not in a halting state, h and the tape's range is in A. Further, recall that v(h)=0, v(a1)=1, v(a|A|)=|A| and v(q|Q|)=B−1. If the tape contents of every tape square is a1, this corresponds to x and y coordinates whose fractional parts are
If the tape contents of every tape square is a|A|, which is the tape symbol with the largest value with respect to v, then this corresponds to x and y coordinates whose fractional parts are
Thus, the point p in the immortal orbit corresponding to each configuration has the property that
Thus, any cluster point of the immortal orbit must be at least
from the boundary of each Wk.
Before the main result is reached, it is helpful to do some elementary counting of finite tape patterns (sequences) based on the finite alphabet A and the finite state set Q regardless of the particular Turing machine program η.
s1s2=12 is a particular 2-sequence where s1=1 and s2=2
The 2-sequence 12 occurs four times on the above tape. The 2-sequence 12 is non-overlapping. The 3-sequence s1s2s3=123 occurs two times on the above tape.
Suppose alphabet A={a1, a2, a3 . . . , an}. A k-sequence is a sequence of k symbols denoted as s1 s2 s3 . . . sk where each sj lies in A.
Let Tk denote the alphabet symbol on the kth square of the Turing tape. Then Tk Tk+1 . . . Tn, where k is an n−k+1 sequence of alphabet symbols. The two sequences Tj Tj+1 . . . Tm and Tk Tk+1 . . . Tn are disjoint if m<k OR n<j. Otherwise, they are called overlapping sequences. Furthermore, overlapping sequences are distinct if j≠k OR m≠n.
The two tape sequences Tj Tj+1 . . . Tm and Tk Tk+1 . . . Tn are identical if they are the same length (i.e. n−k=m−j) and Tk+1=Tj+1 for each i satisfying 1≦i≦n−k.
Two Turing machines M1(Q1, A1, η1) and M2(Q2, A2, η2) have identical program execution up to Bn if there is an isomorphism Ψ: M1→M2 such that the following conditions hold:
Observe that the same machine can be identical to itself up to Bn at two different steps in its program execution.
Thus a1a2a3 repeats one of the previous 3-sequences. In a sequence of length equal to |A|3+3 at least one 3-sequence is repeated.
In any sequence of length |A|2+2, two distinct overlapping 2-sequences are repeated.
Duality of 0 and 1 for the remaining eight have corresponding repeats as the first eight.
Distinct overlapping n-sequences that are subsequences of any sequence of length L=|A|n+n implies that at least two subsequences are identical.
Proof.
Let a1 a2 a3 . . . aL be any alphabet sequence constructed from A. Define the set of n-sequences S={aj+1 aj+2 . . . aj+n: 0≦j≦|A|n}. All elements of S are subsequences of a1a2a3 . . . a. By the definition of S, there are |A|n+1 distinct overlapping subsequences of a1a2a3 . . . aL but the maximum number of non-identical n-sequences constructed from A is |A|n. Thus, at least two n-sequences must be identical.
Distinct non-overlapping n-sequences that are subsequences of any sequence of length L=m|A|n+n implies that at least m+1 subsequences are identical.
Proof.
Define S={aj+1 aj+2 . . . aj+n: 0≦j≦m|A|n}. The rest of the proof is similar as for 4.13.
Any Turing tape sequence of length L=|Q∥A|n+n has at least one n-sequence that occurs |Q|+1 times. In other words, the tape sequence has |Q|+1 distinct, non-overlapping subsequences.
Proof.
This follows immediately from lemma 4.14 and definitions 4.7, 4.8 and 4.9.
If machine (Q, A, η) has an immortal configuration, then it has an immortal periodic point.
Proof.
Let ƒ1, ƒ2, . . . ƒI denote I affine functions with corresponding unit square domains W1, W2, W3, . . . , W1 induced by a Turing machine (Q, A, η) where base B=|Q|+|A|1. Let p=(x(q, k, T), y(q, k, T)) for some immortal configuration (q, k, T) with respect to (Q, A, η). Then the orbit of p, [p, ƒS(1)(p), ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), . . . , ƒS(m)ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), . . . ], is an immortal orbit. By theorem 4.4, let z be a cluster point of this immortal orbit. By choosing appropriate elements of the subsequence of the orbit that converges to z, there exists a subsequence from this immortal orbit with the following properties:
Consider the sequence of squares [an, bn, cn, dn] with center zn and sides with length
for n>1. See
From lemma 4.5, z is in the interior of Wj for some j. Set δ=infimum{d(p, z): pε∂Wj}. Since z is in the interior, then δ>0. Thus, there is a natural number N such that
Thus, for n≧N this geometrically means that if z is in the square [an, bn, cn, dn] then this whole square is a subset of Wj.
Also, observe that
See
Covering Condition.
If for some n≧N, the linear part of at least one rn is of the form
for some m≧1, then rn([an, bn, cn, dn]) vertically or horizontally covers the square [an, bn, cn, dn]. For this particular n≧N, this implies that rn has a fixed point in square [an, bn, cn, dn]⊂W. By theorems 1.13 and 1.14, the vertical and horizontal covering fixed point theorems respectively, rn has a fixed point which is an immortal periodic point. Otherwise, for some M, for all n≧M, the linear part of rn is the identity:
Set U=maximum {M, N} where N was chosen above such that
If there exists n≧L with rn(x, y)=(x, y), the proof is completed. Otherwise, from 2.26 and 2.29, the program execution is unbounded on the left of the tape or the right of the tape or both. W.L.O.G. it is assumed that program execution is unbounded on the right. (The argument for unbounded on the left is similar.)
Thus, when n≧L, then zn corresponds to the tape head being located at some position k, the tape contents are fixed at least n symbols in both directions from the tape square k and the machine is in some state q1. In other words, zn corresponds to
Since the program execution is unbounded on the right, for the next net L moves to the right on the tape, consider the state q when the tape head is located at tape square k+U+j for each j such that 0≦j≦L. By lemma 4.14, there are |Q|+1 distinct tape (2U+1)-sequences that are identical where the tape head lies at a distinct tape location that is in the middle of this (2U+1)-sequence. Since there are |Q| states, this means there are at least two of these sequences that are identical and are also in the same state. Thus, there is an affine map r from the one identical (2U+1)-sequence (point v) to the other identical (2 U+1)-sequence (point w); in other words, r(v)=w where map r's linear part is hyperbolic
such that m≧1. Let [av, bv, cv, dv] be the square with center v and side length equal to
Thus,
implies that r([av, bv, cv, dv]) horizontally covers the square [av, bv, cv, dv]. By 1.14, r has a fixed point in [av, bv, cv, dv] which is an immortal periodic point.
The work in the previous proof yields a sharper result. In particular, if m, n≧L, then zm and zn are identical up to BL. Thus, the execution of the machine for the next net L tape head moves to the right are identical.
Thus, the immortal orbit [p, ƒS(1)(p), . . . , ƒS(m)ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p), . . . ] has a subsequence that converges to a periodic point in square [av, bv, cv, dv] with center v. Also observe that 2.19, 2.21, and 4.4 imply that this immortal periodic point corresponds to an immortal periodic configuration.
By making each of the (2U+1)-sequences in theorem 4.16 at least m tape squares apart the horizontal covering rectangle or vertical covering rectangle can be made thinner than ε>0 where the periodic point lies inside the covering rectangle.
Let ƒk: Wk→P where 1≦k≦I denote I affine maps derived from some Turing machine (Q, A, η) as described in section 2 with base B=|Q|+|A|+1 where A={#, a2, . . . , aJ}. Here a1=#. Suppose ƒj is a left affine function. Then for each k such that 1≦k≦I, then ƒj(Wj) vertically covers Wk or ƒj(Wj)∩Wk=Ø.
Proof.
If ƒj(Wj)∩Wk=Ø, then the proof is completed. Otherwise, ƒj(Wj)∩Wk≠Ø, Let (t, u) denote the lower left corner of Wj. The point (t, u) does not correspond to any configuration that can occur because h is a halt state and is not an alphabet symbol but aids in the understanding of the geometry of the configurations:
where b, c, and d lie in A and t=B v(c)+v(d) and u=B v(q)+v(b).
The point
corresponds to the machine configuration:
where
such that every tape square that is two or more tape squares to the right of the tape head contains symbol # and every tape square that is two or more tape squares to the left of the tape head contains symbol #. Observe that from 2.11, the geometric series
The point
corresponds to the machine configuration:
where
such that every tape square that is two or more tape squares to the right of the tape head contains symbol aj and every tape square that is two or more tape squares to the left of the tape head contains symbol aj. Observe that the fractional part is computed as
because v(aJ)=|A|. See
The point ƒj(p) corresponds to the machine configuration:
The point ƒj(z) corresponds to the machine configuration:
such that every tape square that is three or more tape squares to the right of the tape head contains the symbol aJ and every tape square that is one or more tape squares to the left of the tape head contains the symbol aJ.
Remarks I, II, III and IV—verify the geometry shown in
From the geometry of
Remark I:
Since v(d)≧1, then (B−1) v(d)≧(B−1). Thus, B v(d)−v(d)+1≧B.
Thus,
Simplifying both sides completes Remark I.
Remark II:
0≦(B−1) (|A|−v(d)) implies that (B−1) v(d)+|A|≦|A| B
Thus,
Simplifying both sides completes Remark II.
Remark III:
(The lower horizontal side of ƒj(Wj) is below the lower horizontal side of Wk.)
If
then since the fractional part of
this implies that B v(q)+v(#)>nk. Thus, B v(q)+v(#)−nk≧1 because B v(q)+v(#) is a positive integer. This implies the lower horizontal side of fj(Wj) is above Wk which contradicts that ƒj(Wj)∩Wk≠Ø
Remark IV:
(The upper horizontal side of ƒj(Wj) is above the upper horizontal side of Wk.)
If
then since the fractional part of y(ƒj(z)) is
this implies that B v(q)+v(aJ)<nk. Thus, nk−(Bv(q)+v(aJ))≧1 because Bv(q)+v(aJ) is a positive integer. This implies the upper horizontal side of ƒj(Wj) is below Wk which contradicts that ƒj(Wj)∩Wk≠Ø.
Right Affine Function Horizontally Covers or No Intersection
Proof.
It is similar to 5.1.
Let ƒk: Wk→P where 1≦k≦I denote I affine maps derived by a Turing machine (Q, A, η). Suppose S: {1, 2, . . . m}→{1, 2, . . . I} where m is a positive integer. Then the finite sequence [S(1), S(2), S(3), . . . , S(m)] is a covering path of length m−1 if the following hold:
The covering path [S(1), S(2), S(3), . . . , S(m)] is a covering cycle of length m if φ(S(m))∩WS(1)≠Ø. If S(j)=S(k) and k≦m and 1≦k−j≦m then [S(j), S(j+1), . . . , S(k−1)] is called a subcycle of [S(1), S(2), S(3), . . . , S(m)]. A cycle is prime if it has no subcycles.
Suppose p is an immortal periodic point. Suppose m is the fundamental period of p. Then there is a sequence S: {1, 2, . . . , m}→{1, 2, . . . , I} such that ƒS(m)ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(1)(p)=p; p lies in WS(1); ƒS(k)ƒS(k−1) . . . ƒS(1)(p) lies in WS(k+1) for each k satisfying 1≦k≦m; and ƒS(m) ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(1)(p) lies in WS(1). These previous conditions from the immortal periodic point imply that for k with 1≦k≦m, then ƒS(k) ƒS(k−1) . . . ƒS(1)(p) lies in φ(S(k))∩WS(k+1) and ƒS(m) ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(1)(p) lies in φ(S(m))∩WS(1). Thus, all cycle covering conditions in 5.3 hold.
The sequence [S(1), S(2), S(3), . . . , S(m)] generated in 5.4 is called the covering cycle induced by immortal periodic point p.
[S(1), S(2), S(3), . . . , S(m)] is called a hyperbolic covering cycle if the composition of the affine maps indexed by [S(1), S(2), S(3), . . . , S(m)], namely, ƒS(m) ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(1), has a linear part of the form
for some integer k≠0. It is called a non-hyperbolic covering cycle if the linear part equals
A non-hyperbolic cycle is called an identity cycle if the translational part of ƒS(m) ƒS(m−1) . . . ƒS(1), is zero.
Suppose the covering cycle [S(1), S(2), S(3), . . . , S(m)] is the composition of only non-hyperbolic prime cycles. Then [S(1), S(2), S(3), . . . , S(m)] is non-hyperbolic.
Proof.
This follows immediately from the fact that if r1(x, y)=(x+m1, y+n1) and r2(x, y)=(x+m2, y+n2) then the linear part of r2r1 equals the identity matrix.
The fixed permutation (1) corresponds to covering cycle [1].
Permutation (1 2) corresponds to covering cycle [1, 2]
Permutation (S(1) S(2) . . . S(m)] corresponds to covering cycle [S(1), S(2), . . . , S(m)]
Proof.
Let σ be a hyperbolic cycle. If it is prime, then the proof is completed. Otherwise, σ is a composition of prime cycles. From remark 5.7 at least one of these prime cycles must be hyperbolic.
Proof.
Let [ƒS(1), ƒS(2), . . . , ƒS(m)] be the potential hyperbolic cycle or identity cycle induced by the immortal periodic point p. Then ƒS(m) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p)=p. Then ƒS(k) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p) lies in WS(k+1) for each k because p is immortal. This means that for each k, ƒS(k) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p) lies in φ(S(k))∩WS(k+1). Thus, [ƒS(1), ƒS(2), . . . , ƒS(m)] is a covering cycle. If ƒS(m) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1) is non-hyperbolic, then since ƒS(m) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1)(p)=p the translational part of ƒS(m) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1) must be zero. Otherwise, ƒS(m) . . . ƒS(2)ƒS(1) is hyperbolic.
For any Turing Machine (Q, A, 77), if p=(x(q, k, T), y(q, k, T)) for some configuration (q, k, T) has an immortal orbit with respect to the corresponding affine maps fk: Wk→P where 1≦k≦I, derived from (Q, A, η), then for each immortal periodic point, there exists an identity cycle or a hyperbolic cycle containing it.
Proof.
By 4.16 the existence of an immortal orbit implies that immortal periodic orbit(s) exist. By lemma 5.10, every immortal periodic point lies in a hyperbolic cycle or identity cycle. If a particular immortal periodic point lies in a hyperbolic cycle, then by lemma 5.9, the hyperbolic cycle contains a prime, hyperbolic cycle that contains this immortal periodic point.
If Turing Machine (Q, A, η) can execute |Q| consecutive computational steps which are all right tape head moves or all left tape head moves without halting, then the machine has an immortal periodic point with period ≦|Q|.
Proof.
Consecutive Right Tape Head Moves.
Suppose there are |Q| consecutive computational steps which are all right tape head moves. Thus, there is a sequence of |Q| commands η(qk, ak)=(qk+1, bk, R) satisfying 1≦k≦|Q| that execute these |Q| computational steps without halting. In the table below, the subscript k in each state qk indicates the state of the machine just before the kth computational step.
The Dirichlet Box principle applied to the |Q|+1 states {q1, q2 . . . q|Q|, q|Q|+1} implies that two of the states are equal; namely, qj=qk for some j<k. Thus, the point
is an immortal periodic point with period k−j and (k−j)≦|Q|.
Consecutive Left Tape Head Moves.
Suppose there are |Q| consecutive computational steps which are all left tape head moves. Thus, there is a sequence of |Q| commands η(qk, ak)=(qk+1, bk, L) satisfying 1≦k≦|Q| that execute these |Q| computational steps without halting. In the table below, the subscript k in each state qk indicates the state of the machine just before the kth computational step.
The Dirichlet Box principle applied to the |Q|+1 states {q1, q2, . . . q|Q|, q|Q|+1} implies that two of the states are equal; namely, qj=qk for some j<k. Thus, the point
is an immortal periodic point with period k−j and (k −j)≦|Q|.
Consider Turing Machine (Q, A, η). If for some q in Q, and for some a, b in A, η(q, a)=(q, b, R) or η(q, a)=(q, b, L), then (Q, A, η) has an immortal fixed point.
Proof.
If η(q, a)=(q, b, R), then p=[q,
If (Q, A, η) has no immortal orbits, then it is called a halting machine. Otherwise, the minimum {C(p): p is an immortal periodic point of (Q, A, η)} is well-defined because it is the minimum of a non-empty subset of the natural numbers. This minimum is called the minimal period of (Q, A, η).
If Q={q, r} has only two non-halting states and A={0, 1}, then (Q, A, η) is a halting machine or its minimal period is 1, 2 or 4.
Proof.
If (Q, A, η) is a halting machine, then the proof is completed. Otherwise, suppose (Q, A, η) has an immortal periodic point with period ≧5. Then it is shown that this implies the machine must have an immortal periodic point with period ≦4.
Consider the first 5 computational steps of the immortal periodic point p. If two consecutive steps stay in the same state, then by remark 6.2, then (Q, A, η) has an immortal periodic point with period 1. Done. Furthermore, if there are two consecutive right tape head moves or left tape head moves, during these five computational steps, then by lemma 6.1, there is an immortal periodic point with period ≦2.
Thus, W.L.O.G. (due to symmetry), for the remaining cases the first five computational steps look like—where the variables x1, x2, x3, x4, yi, y2, y3 represent elements of A:
Observation 1.
x1=x2 implies x1=x2=x3 because computational steps 1 and 3 are η(q, x1)=(r, x2, R) and η(q, x2)=(r, x3, R).
Observation 2.
y1=y2 implies that yi=y2=y3 because computational steps 2 and 4 are η(r, y1)=(q, y2, L) and η(r, y2)=(q, y3, L).
Observation 3.
Since A has 2 elements, [x1=x2 or x1=x3 or x2=x3] and [y1=y2 or y1=y3 or y2=y3].
Case 1: x2=x3 and y2=y3. Based on steps 3 and 4, point p=[q,
Many of the nine cases below are reduced to previous cases.
Case 2: x1=x2 and y2=y3. The first observation reduces case 2 to case 1.
Case 3: x1=x3 and y2=y3. By replacing all occurrences of x3 by x1 and all occurrences of y3 by y2, then the previous table becomes:
After the substitution, from step 4, then η(r, y2)=(q, y2, L). This implies step 6 in the table. Looking at steps 2 and 6, point p=[q,
Case 4: x1=x3 and y1=y3. Substituting x1 for x3 and y1 for y3 in step 4 of the original table, then the point p=[q,
Case 5: x1=x2 and y1=y3. This reduces to case 4 from the first observation.
Case 6: x2=x3 and y1=y3. Substituting x2 for x3 and y1 for y3 in the original table and observing that from step 3 that η(q, x2)=(q, x2, R). This implies that x4=x2
Then observe that after step 1 and step 5, the points are identical. Thus, the point p=[r,
Case 7: x1=x2 and y1=y2. This reduces to case 2 from the second observation.
Case 8: x1=x3 and y1=y2. This reduces to case 4 from the second observation.
Case 9: x2=x3 and y1=y2. This reduces to case 6 from the second observation.
Finally, it is shown that any machine having an immortal periodic point with period 3 must have an immortal periodic point with period 1 or 2. Suppose the machine has an immortal period 3 point. During the three computational steps, the claim is that there has to be two consecutive steps that are in the same state. For example, the state sequence q, r, q, r would contradict that it is a period 3 orbit because at step 0 it is in state q and after step 3 it is in state r; similarly, the state sequence r, q, r, q would contradict that is a period 3 orbit. Thus, there must be two consecutive steps that are in the same state, which implies it is an immortal fixed point. Thus, the machine can not have a minimal period of 3.
The notion of an overlap match expresses how a part or all of one pattern may match part or all of another pattern. Let V and W be patterns. (V, s) overlap matches (W, t) if and only if V(s+c)=W(t+c) for each integer c satisfying λ≦c≦μ such that λ=min{s, t} and μ=min{|V|−1−s, |W|−1−t} where 0≦s≦|V| and 0≦t≦|W|. The index s is called the head of pattern V and t is called the head of pattern W. If V is also a subpattern, then (V, s) submatches (W, t).
If (V, s) overlap matches (W, t), then define the intersection pattern I with head u=λ as (I, u)=(V, s)∩(W, t), where I(c)=V(c+s−λ) for every integer c satisfying 0≦c≦(μ+λ) where λ=min {s, t} and μ=min{|V|−1−s, |W|−1−t}.
Consider pattern V=v0 v1 . . . vn, pattern W=w0 w1 . . . wn with heads s, t satisfying 0≦s, t≦n and pattern P=p0 p1 . . . pm with head u satisfying 0≦u≦m. Suppose (P, u) overlap matches (V, s). Then define the edge pattern substitution operator ⊕ as E=(P, u)⊕[(V, s)(W, t)] according to the four different cases A., B., C. and D.
Case A.)
u>s and m−u>n−s
Overlap and intersection matching and edge pattern substitution are useful in sections 7, 8 and 10.
Set pattern P=0101 110. Set pattern V=11 0101. Set pattern W=01 0010. Then (P, 0) overlap matches (V, 2). Edge pattern substitution is well-defined so E=(P, 0)⊕[(V, 2)(W, 4)]=01 0010 110. The head or index of pattern E=4.
Also, (P, 4) overlap matches (V, 0). F=(P, 4)⊕[(V, 0)(W, 4)]=0101 010010. The index of pattern F=u+t−s=4+4−0=8.
Consider N execution steps of Turing Machine (Q, A, η). After each execution step, the machine is in some state qk and the tape head is pointing to some alphabet symbol ak. Relabeling the indices of the states and the alphabet symbols if necessary and assuming the machine has not halted after N execution steps in terms of the input commands is denoted as: (q0, a0)(q1, a1)(qN−1, aN−1)(qN, aN). A state cycle is a valid execution sequence of input commands such that the first and last input command in the sequence have the same state i.e. (qk, ak)(qk+1, ak+1)(qN−1, aN−1)(qk, ak). The length of this state cycle equals the number of input commands minus one. A state cycle is called a prime state cycle if it contains no proper state subcycles. For a prime state cycle, the length of the cycle equals the number of distinct states in the sequence. For example, (2, 0)(3, 1)(4, 0)(2, 1) is called a prime 3-state cycle because it has length 3 and also 3 distinct states {2, 3, 4}.
This follows from the Dirichlet principle and the definition of a prime state cycle.
Given an alphabet A and states Q, consider an arbitrary prime state cycle with length 1, (q, a)(q, b). There are |Q∥A| choices for the first input command and choices for the second input command since the states must match. Thus, there are |Q|distinct prime state cycles with length 1.
Similarly, consider a prime state cycle with window of execution whose length is 2, this can be represented as (q1, a1)(q2, a2)(q1, b1). For the tape head move sequence RL, the tape square diagram looks like
Then there are |Q∥A| choices for (q1, a1) and once (q1, a1) is chosen there is only one choice for q2 because it is completely determined by η(q1, a1)=(q2, b1) where η is the program in (Q, A, η). Similarly, there is only one choice for b1. There are |A| choices for a2. Thus, there are |Q∥A|2 distinct choices.
For an arbitrary prime state cycle (q1, a1)(q2, a2)(q1, an+1) with window of execution of length k then there are |Q|choices for (q1, a1) and |A| choices for a2 since the current window of execution length after the first step increases by 1. There is only one choice for q2 because it is determined by η(q1, a1). Similarly, for the jth computational step, if the current window of execution length increases by 1, then there are |A| choices for (qj+1, aj+1). Similarly, for the jth computational step, if the current window of execution stays unchanged, then there is only one choice for aj+1 that was determined by one of the previous j computational steps. Thus, there are at most |Q∥A|k distinct prime state cycles whose window of execution length equals k. Definitions 3.15 and remark 3.16 imply that a prime k-state cycle has a window of execution length less than or equal to k. Thus, from the previous and 7.5, there are at most
distinct prime state cycles in (Q, A, η).
Proof.
Relabeling if necessary let S(q1, q1)=(q1, a1)(qn, an)(q1, an+1) be a state cycle. If q1 is the only state visited twice, then the proof is completed. Otherwise, define μ=min{|S(qk, qk)|: S(qk, qk) is a subcycle of S(q1, q1)}. Then μ exists because
S(q1, q1) is a subcycle of S(q1, q1). Claim: Any state cycle S(qj, qj) with |S(qj, qj)=μ must be a prime state cycle. Suppose not. Then there is a state r≠qj that is visited twice in the state cycle S(qj, qj). But then S(qr, qr) is a cycle with length less than μ which contradicts μ's definition.
If machine (Q, A, η) starts execution and repeats a state cycle two consecutive times i.e. (q1, b1)(qn, bn)(q1, b1)(qn, bn)(q1, b1), then (Q, A, η) has a consecutive repeating state cycle.
An execution node (or node) is a triplet Π=[q, w0 w1 . . . wn, t] for some state q in Q where w0 w1 . . . wn is a pattern of n+1 alphabet symbols each in A such that t is a non-negative integer satisfying 0≦t≦n. Intuitively, w0 w1 . . . wn is the pattern of alphabet symbols on n+1 consecutive tape squares on the tape and t represents the location of the tape head.
Proof.
Suppose p is an immortal periodic point with period n. Then by the Turing-Affine correspondence theorem the kth iterate of p is ƒS(k) ƒS(k−1) . . . ƒS(1)(p) and the application of affine function ƒS(k) corresponds to the execution of input command (qk, bk). Thus; let the input command sequence (q1, b1)(qn, bn)(qn+1, bn+1) denote the first n input commands that are executed. Since p has period n, ƒS(n) . . . ƒS(k) . . . ƒS(1)(p)=p. Thus, (q1, b1)=(qn+1, bn+1). Thus, the first n steps are a state cycle (q1, b1)(qn, bn)(q1, b1). Since the n+1 computational step corresponds to applying ƒS(1) to p which corresponds to input command (q1, b1). By induction, the n+k computational step corresponds to applying function ƒS(k) to the point ƒS(k−1) . . . ƒS(1)(p) which by the previous paragraph corresponds to the execution of the input command (qk, bk). Thus, the sequence of input commands is (q1, b1)(qn, bn)(q1, b1)(qn, bn)(q1, b1).
Suppose Turing machine (Q, A, η) begins or resumes execution at some tape square and repeats a state cycle two consecutive times. Then (Q, A, η) has an immortal periodic point and this state cycle induces the immortal periodic point.
Proof.
Let the state cycle that is repeated two consecutive times be denoted as (q1, b1)(qn, bn)(q1, b1)(qn, bn)(q1, b1). Let sk denote the tape square right before input command (qk, bk) is executed the first time where 1≦k≦n. Let tk denote the tape square right before input command (qk, bk) is executed the second time where 1≦k≦n.
Thus, the window of execution for the first repetition of the state cycle, right before input command (q1, b1) is executed a second time, denoted In={s1, s2, . . . , sk, sk+1 . . . sn, sn+1} where sn+1=t1. The window of execution for the second repetition of the state cycle is Jn={t1, t2, . . . , tn, tn+1} where tn+1=tn−sn.
Furthermore, observe that the window of execution for the computational steps 1 thru k is Ik={s1, s2, . . . , sk, sk+1} where the tape square sk+1 is indicated after input command (qk, bk) is executed the first time. Also, observe that the window of execution for the computational steps n+1 thru n+k is Jk={t1, t2, . . . , tk, tk+1} where the tape square tk+1 is indicated after the input command (qk, bk) is executed the second time (in the second repeating cycle).
Next a useful notation represents the tape patterns for each computational step. Then the proof is completed using induction.
Let V1 denote the tape pattern—which is the sequence of alphabet symbols in the tape squares over the window of execution In—right before input command (q1, b1) is executed the first time. Thus, V1(s1)=b1. Let Vk denote the tape pattern—which is the sequence of alphabet symbols in the tape squares over the window of execution In—right before input command (qk, bk) is executed the first time. Thus, Vk(sk)=bk.
Let W1 denote the tape pattern—which is the sequence of alphabet symbols in the tape squares over the window of execution Jn—right before input command (q1, b1) is executed the second time. Thus, W1(t1)=b1. Let Wk denote the tape pattern—which is the sequence of alphabet symbols in the tape squares over the window of execution Jn—right before input command (qk, bk) is executed the second time. Thus, Wk(tk)=bk.
Using induction, it is shown that V1 on window of execution In equals W1 on window of execution Jn. This completes the proof.
Since (q1, b1) is the input command before computational step 1 and (q1, b1) is the input command before computational step n+1, then V1(s1)=b1=W1(t1). Thus, V1 restricted to window of execution I1 equals W1 restricted to window of execution J1.
From the definition, η(q1, b1)=η(q2, a1, x) for some a1 in A and where x equals L or R. Note that L represents a left tape head move and R a right tape head move.
Case x=R. a Right Tape Head Move.
Then s2=s1+1, t2=t1+1 and V1(s2)=b2=W1(t2). It has already been observed that V1(s1)=b1=W1(t1). Thus, V1 restricted to the window of execution J2 equals W1 restricted on the window of execution J2. Furthermore, the tape head is at s1 right before computational step 1 and input command (q1, b1) is executed; the tape head is at t1 right before computational step n+1 and input command (q1, b1) is executed.
Also, V2(s1)=a1=W2(t1) and V2(s2)=b2=W2(t2). Thus, V2 restricted to the window of execution I2 equals W2 restricted to the window of execution J2. Furthermore, the tape head is at s2 right before computational step 2 with input command (q2, b2) is executed; the tape head is at t2 right before computational step n+2 with input command (q2, b2) is executed.
Case x=L. a Left Tape Head Move.
Then s2=s1−1, t2=t1−1 and V1(s2)=b2=W1(t2). And V1(s1)=b1=W1(t1). Thus, V1 restricted to the window of execution I2 equals W1 restricted on the window of execution J2. Furthermore, the tape head is at s1 right before computational step 1 and input command (q1, b1) is executed; the tape head is at t1 right before computational step n+1 and input command (q1, b1) is executed.
Also, V2(s1)=a1=W2(t1) and V2(s2)=b2=W2(t2). Thus, V2 restricted to the window of execution I2 equals W2 restricted to the window of execution J2 Furthermore, the tape head is at s2 right before computational step 2 and input command (q2, b2) is executed; the tape head is at t2 right before computational step n+2 and input command (q2, b2) is executed. This completes the base case of induction.
Induction Hypothesis.
Suppose that for the 1, 2, . . . , k−1 computational steps and the corresponding n+1, n+2, . . . , n+k−1 steps that for every i with 1≦i≦k
Induction Step.
Since (qk, bk) is the input command before computational step k and before computational step n+k, then Vk(sk)=bk=Wk(tk).
From the definition, η(qk, bk)=η(qk+1, ak, x) for some ak in A and x equals L or R. Note that L represents a left tape head move and R a right tape head move.
Case x=R. a Right Tape Head Move for Computational Steps k and n+k.
By the inductive hypothesis Vk restricted to window of execution Ik equals Wk restricted to window of execution Jk and the only change to the tape and tape head after executing η(qk, bk)=η(gk+1, ak, R) for the steps k and n+k is that Vk+1(sk)=ak=Wk+1(tk) and Vk+1(sk+1)=bk+1=Wk+1(tk+1) and that the tape heads move right to sk+1 and tk+1 respectively.
Thus, Vk+1 restricted to the window of execution Ik+1 equals Wk+1 restricted on the window of execution Jk+1. And for each j satisfying 1≦j≦k, then Vj restricted to the window of execution Ik+1 equals Wj restricted on the window of execution Jk+1.
Case x=L. A Left Tape Head Move for Computational Steps k and n+k.
By the inductive hypothesis Vk restricted to window of execution Ik equals Wk restricted to window of execution Jk and the only change to the tape and tape head after executing η(qk, bk)=η(qk+1, ak, L) for the steps k and n+k is that Vk+1(sk)=ak=Wk+1(tk) and Vk+1(Sk+1)=bk+1=Wk+1(tk+1) and that the tape heads move left to sk+1 and tk+1 respectively.
Thus, Vk+1 restricted to the window of execution Ik+1 equals Wk+1 restricted on the window of execution Jk+1. And for each j satisfying 1≦j≦k, then Vj restricted to the window of execution Ik+1 equals Wj restricted on the window of execution Jk+1.
A prime head execution node Δ=[q, v0 v1 . . . vn, s] and prime tail execution node Γ=[r,w0 w1 . . . wn, t] (see
A prime directed edge is denoted as ΔΓ or [q, v0 v1 . . . vn, s][r, w0 w1 . . . wn, t]. The number of computational steps N is denoted as |ΔΓ|.
7.4 introduced input commands. If (q1, a1)(qn, an) is an execution sequence of input commands for (Q, A, η), then (q1, a1)(qn, an) is a prime input command sequence if qn is visited twice and all other states in the sequence are visited once. In other words, a prime input command sequence contains exactly one prime state cycle.
Using the same notation as lemma 7.11, let V1 denote the initial tape pattern—which is the sequence of alphabet symbols in the tape squares over the window of execution of the prime input command sequence—right before the first input command (q1, a1) in the sequence is executed. And let s1 denote the location of the tape head i.e. V1(s1)=a1. Let Vk denote the tape pattern right before the kth input command (qk, ak) in the sequence is executed and let sk denote the location of the tape head i.e. Vk(sk)=ak.
Let (q1, a1)(qn, an) and (r1, b1)(rm, bm) be prime input command sequences where Vk denotes the tape pattern right before the kth input command (qk, ak) with tape head at sk with respect to Vk and Wk denotes the tape pattern right before the kth input command (rk, bk) with tape head at tk with respect to Wk.
Suppose (Vn, sn) overlap matches with (W1, t1) and qn=r1. Then (qn, an)=(r1, b1). And the composition of these two prime input command sequences is defined as (q1, a1)(qn, an)(r2, b2)(rm, bm)
The composition is undefined if (Vn, sn) and (W1, t1) do not overlap match or qn≠r1.
If (q1, a1)(qn, an)(q1, b1) is a prime state cycle, then it is also prime input command sequence. For simplicity in upcoming lemma 8.15, it is called a composition of one prime input command sequence.
The purpose of these next group of definitions is to show that any consecutive repeating state cycle is contained inside a composition of prime input command sequences. From lemmas 7.10 and 7.11, there is a one to one correspondence between a consecutive repeating state cycle and an immortal periodic point.
If this consecutive repeating state cycle is rotated, then it is still part of the same periodic orbit of the original periodic point. Next it is shown that there is a one to one correspondence between prime input command sequences and prime directed edges. Subsequently, it is explained how to link match prime directed edges. Then it is demonstrated how to find all prime directed edges for a particular Turing machine. If a particular Turing machine has any immortal periodic points, then it will have corresponding consecutive repeating state cycles which will be contained in an edge sequence of prime directed edges that are link matched.
Start with the finite sequence (0, 4, 2, 3, 4, 1, 3, 0, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2, 3, 4, 1, 3, 0, 1, 2).
Partition Steps
A tuple is a finite sequence of objects denoted as (σ1, σ2, . . . , σm). The length of the tuple is the number of objects in the sequence denoted as |(σ1, σ2, . . . , σm)|=m. For our purposes, the objects of the tuple may be states, input commands or natural numbers. (3) is a tuple of length one. (1, 4, 5, 6) is a tuple of length four. Sometimes the commas will be omitted as in the previous example. (4 6 0 1 2 3) is a tuple of length six. The 4 is called the first object in tuple (4 6 0 1 2 3). 1 is called a member of tuple (4 6 0 1 2 3).
A tuple of tuples is of the form (w1, w2, . . . , wn) where each wk may have a different length. An example of a tuple of tuples is ((3), (1, 4, 5, 6), (4, 5, 6)). Sometimes the commas are omitted: ((0 8 2 3) (1 7 5 7) (5 5 6)).
A directed partition is a tuple of tuples (w1, w2, . . . , wn) that satisfies Rules A and B.
((0 8 2 3) (8 7 5 4) (5 0 6)) is an example of a directed partition.
((0 8 2 3) (8 7 5 4) (5 0 6)) is sometimes called a partition tuple.
(0 8 2 3) is the first element tuple. And the first object in this element tuple is 0.
Element tuple (8 0 5 7 0 3) violates Rule A because object 0 occurs twice.
((0 8 2 3) (1 7 5 4) (5 0 6)) violates Rule B since 1 is not a member of element tuple (0 8 2 3).
A consecutive repeating sequence is a sequence (x1, x2, . . . , xn, . . . , x2n) of length 2n for some positive integer n such that xk=xn+k for each k satisfying 1≦k≦n. An extension sequence is the same consecutive repeating sequence for the first 2n elements (x1 . . . xn . . . x2n . . . x2n+m) such that xk=x2n+k for each k satisfying 1≦k≦m.
A minimal extension sequence is an extension sequence (x1, . . . , x2n+m) where m is the minimum positive number such that there is one element in x2n, x2n+1, . . . , x2n+m that occurs more than once. Thus, x2n+k=X2n+m for some k satisfying 0≦k≦m.
For example, the sequence S=(4 2 3 4 1 3 0 1 2 0 4 2 3 4 1 3 0 1 2 0) is a consecutive repeating sequence and
Suppose (x1 . . . xn . . . x2n, x2n+1, . . . , x2n+m) is an extension of consecutive repeating sequence (x1 . . . , xn . . . x2n). Then (w1, w2, . . . , wr) is a directed partition extension if it is a directed partition of the extension: The last tuple wr satisfies Rule B if x2n+m is the last object in tuple wr and xm+1 lies in tuple wr.
For example, the extension
Given a finite sequence (x1 . . . xn) of objects.
Initialize element tuple w1 to the empty tuple, ( )
Initialize partition tuple P to the empty tuple, ( )
For each element xk in sequence (x1 . . . xn)
The final result is the current partition tuple P after element xn is examined in the loop.
Observe that the tail of elements from (x1 . . . xn) with no repeated elements will not lie in the last element tuple of the final result P.
www.newlisp.org.
Proof.
As defined in 8.10, extend consecutive repeating sequence (x1, x2 . . . x2n) to the extension sequence (x1, x2 . . . x2n, x2n+1 . . . x2n+m) such that m is the minimum positive number such that there is one element in x2n, x2n+1 . . . x2n+m that occurs more than once. Thus, x2n+k=x2n+m for some k satisfying 0≦k≦m.
Apply method 8.12 to
Proof.
Let σ=[(q1, a1)(qn, an)(q1, a1)(qn, an)] be a consecutive repeating cycle. Method 8.12 & 8.14 show that this sequence of consecutive repeating input commands may be extended to a minimal extension sequence: [(q1, a1)(qn, an)(q1, a1)(qn, an)(q1, a1)(qm, am)]
For simplicity, let vk denote input command (qk, ak).
Apply method 8.12 to (v1, . . . vn v1 . . . vn v1 . . . vm) so that the result is the partition tuple P=(w1, . . . wr). Then the sequence of element tuples in P represent a composition of one or more prime input command sequences. Rules A and B imply that for consecutive tuples
wk=(vk(1) vk(2) . . . vk(m)) and wk+1=(v(k+1)(1) v(k+1)(2) . . . v(k+1)(m)), then (qk(1), ak(1))(qk(2), ak(2))(qk(m), ak(m))(q(k+1), a(k+1)(1)) is a prime input command sequence. And 8.14 implies that the last tuple wr corresponds to a prime input command sequence and that the consecutive repeating state cycle is contained in the partition P mapped back to the sequence of input commands.
Let (x0 x1 . . . xn) be a finite sequence. A k-rotation is the resulting sequence (xk xk+1 . . . xn x0 x1 . . . xk−1). The 3-rotation of (8 7 3 4 5) is (3 4 5 8 7). When it does matter how many elements it has been rotated, it is called a sequence rotation.
Let (q1, a1)(qn, an)(q1, b1) be a state cycle. This state cycle is called a state-symbol cycle if a1=b1. A rotation of this state-symbol cycle is the state cycle (qk, ak)(qn, an)(q1, a1)(qk, ak) for some k satisfying 0≦k≦n. In this case, the state-symbol cycle has been rotated by k−1 steps.
Proof.
Let p be the immortal periodic point induced by this consecutive repeating state cycle. Rotating this state cycle by k steps corresponds to iterating p by the next k corresponding affine functions.
Prime directed edges and prime input command sequences are in 1 to 1 correspondence.
Proof. Let ΔΓ be a prime directed edge where Δ=[q, v0 v1 . . . vn, s] and Γ=[r, w0 w1 . . . wn, t]. From the definition of a prime directed edge, over the next N computational steps some state r is visited twice, all other states in Q are visited at most once and there is a sequence of input commands (q, vs)(q1, a1)(r, ak)(r, wt) corresponding to these N steps. This is a prime input command sequence.
Let (q1, a1)(qn, an) be a prime input command sequence with N computational steps. Then qn is visited twice and all other states in the sequence are visited only once. Let v0 v1 . . . vn be the initial tape pattern over the window of execution during the N computational steps. Now a1=vs for some s. Let w0 w1 . . . wn be the final tape pattern over the window of execution as a result of these N steps. Then an=vt for some t. Thus, [q, v0 v1 . . . vn, s][r, w0 w1 . . . wn, t] is a prime directed edge.
Each prime head node determines a unique prime directed edge so an upper bound for head nodes provides an upper bound for the number of distinct prime directed edges. Consider prime head node [q, V, s]. There are |Q| choices for the state q. Any pattern that represents the window of execution has length ≦|Q|+1. Furthermore, by the previous remark any pattern P such that (V, s) submatches (P, t) for some t, then the resultant pattern is the same since V spans the window of execution. Thus, |A||Q|+1 is an upper bound for the number of different patterns V.
Lastly, there are two choices for s in a |Q|+1 length pattern because the maximum number of execution steps is |Q| i.e. the tape head move sequence is L|Q| or R|Q|. Thus, |Q| is an upper bound for the number of choices for s unless |Q|=1. The following bound works in the trivial case that |Q|=1. Thus, there are at most |Q∥A||Q|+1 prime directed edges.
Consider Turing Machine (Q, A, η). Q={2, 3, 4} and 1 is the halting state.
A={0, 1} and η is specified in the following table.
There are 9 distinct prime state cycles. Observe that |Q|2|A||Q|+1=32(42)=144. Observe that |Q|(|A|+|A|2)=2(2+4)=12.
The upper bound in 8.20 appears to not be sharp. Although sharp upper bounds for the number of prime directed edges are important, these types of results are not addressed here.
In what follows prime directed edges are link matched so that for a given Turing Machine a method for finding consecutive repeating state cycles is demonstrated. It is proved that this method will find immortal periodic points if they exist. The expression demonstrate a method for finding is used instead of describe an algorithm in order to not create confusion with the current notion of a Turing algorithm computed by a fixed Turing machine. In section 9, an dynamic register machine is described that can implement this new method of computing.
Suppose [q, v0 v1 . . . vn, s] is an execution node and over the next 10 computational steps a prime state cycle is not found. In other words, a prime directed edge is not generated. Then the Turing machine execution halted in |Q| or less steps. Let W be a pattern such that (W, t) submatches (V, s) and W spans the window of execution until execution halts. Define the halting node as H=[q, W, t].
Remark 8.20 provides an upper bound on the number of prime directed edges. Let P={Δ1Γ1, . . . , ΔkΓk, . . . , ΔNΓN} denote the finite set of prime directed edges for machine (Q, A, η).
Execution node Π overlap matches prime head node Δ iff the following hold:
If Δj=[q, P, u] and Δk=[q, V, s] are prime head nodes and they overlap match, then they are equal. (Distinct edges have prime head nodes that do not overlap match.)
Proof.
0≦u≦|Δj| and 0≦s≦|Ak|.
Let (I, m)=(P, u)∩(V, s) where m=min{s, u}
Suppose the same machine begins execution on tape I with tape head at m in state q.
If s=u and |Δj|=|Δk|, then the proof is complete.
Otherwise, s≠u or |Δj|≠|Δk| or both. Δj has a window of execution [0, |Δj|−1] and Δk has window of execution [0, |Δk|−1]. Let the ith step be the first time that the tape head exits finite tape I. This means the machine would execute the same machine instructions with respect to Δj and Δk up to the ith step, so on the ith step, Δj and Δk must execute the same instruction. Since it exits tape I at the ith step, this would imply that either pattern P or V are exited at the ith step. This contradicts either that [0, |Δj|−1] is the window of execution for Δj or [0, |Δk|−1] is the window of execution for Δk.
Let ΔΓ be a prime directed edge with prime head node Δ=[q, v0 v1 . . . vn, s] and tail node Γ=[r, w0 w1 . . . wn, t]. If execution node Π=[q, p0 p1 . . . pm, u] overlap matches Δ, then the edge pattern substitution operator from 7.2 induces a new execution node Π⊕(ΔΓ)=[r, (P, u)⊕[(V, s)(W, t)], k] with head k=u+t−s if u>s and head k=t if u≦s such that 0≦s, t≦n and 0≦u≦m and patterns V=v0 v1 . . . vn and W=w0 w1 . . . wn and P=p0 p1 . . . pm.
A prime directed edge sequence is defined inductively. Each element is a coordinate pair with the first element being a prime directed edge and the second element is an execution node. Each element is abstractly expressed as (ΔkΓk, Πk).
The first element of a prime directed edge sequence is (Δ1Γ1, Π1) where Π1=Γ1, and Δ1Γ1 is some prime directed edge in P. For simplicity in this definition, the indices in P are relabeled if necessary so the first element has indices equal to 1. If Π1 overlap matches some non-halting prime head node Δ2, the second element of the prime directed edge sequence is (Δ2Γ2, Π2) where Π2=Π1⊕(Δ2Γ2). This is called a link match step.
Otherwise, Π1 overlap matches a halting node, then the prime directed edge sequence terminates. This is expressed as [(Δ1Γ1, Γ1), HALT]. In this case it is called a halting match step.
If the first k−1 steps are link match steps, then the prime directed edge sequence is denoted as [(Δ1Γ1, Π1), (Δ2Γ2, Π2), . . . , (ΔkΓk, Πk] where Πj overlap matches prime head node Δj+1 and ΠJ+1=Πj⊕(Δj+1Γj+1) for each j satisfying 0≦j≦k.
To avoid subscripts of a subscript, pk and the subscript p(j) represent the same number. As defined in 8.27, P={Δ1Γ1, . . . , ΔkΓk, . . . , ΔNΓN} denotes the set of all prime directed edges. E([p1], 1) denotes the edge sequence [(Δp(1)Γp(1), Πp(1))] of length 1 where Πp(1)=Γp(1) and 1≦p1≦|P|. Next E([p1, p2], 2) denotes the edge sequence [(Δp(1)Γp(1), Πp(1), (Δp(2)Γp(2), Πp(2))] of length 2 where Πp(2)=Πp(1)⊕(Δp(2)Γp(2)) and 1≦p1, p2≦|P|.
In general, E[(p1, p2, . . . , pk], k) denotes the edge sequence of length k which is explicitly [(Δp(1)Γp(1), Πp(1)), (Δp(2)Γp(2), Πp(2)), . . . , (Δp(k)Γp(k), Πp(k))] where Πp(j+1)=Πp(j)⊕(Δp(j+1)Γp(j+1)) for each j satisfying 1≦j≦k−1 and 1≦p(j)≦|P|.
Lemma 8.19 implies that an edge sequence corresponds to a composition of prime input commands. The expression an edge sequence contains a consecutive repeating state cycle is used if the corresponding sequence of prime input commands contains a consecutive repeating state cycle.
Proof.
This follows immediately from definition 8.29 and lemmas 8.15 and 8.19.
If E([p1, p2, . . . , pr], r) contains a consecutive repeating state cycle, then the corresponding immortal periodic point has period
Proof. This follows from lemma 7.11 that a consecutive repeating state cycle induces an immortal periodic point. The length of the state cycle equals the period of the periodic point. Further, the number of input commands corresponding to the number of computational steps equals |Δp(k)Γp(k)| in directed edge Δp(k)Γp(k).
Given an edge sequence whose corresponding prime input command sequence (q0, a0)(q1, a1)(qN, aN) has length N.
Given Turing Machine (Q, A, η) as input, the search method works as follows.
Method 8.34 finds all prime directed edges of (Q, A, η) and all halting nodes.
Proof.
Let ΔΓ be a prime directed edge of (Q, A, η). Then ΔΓ has a head node Δ=[r, v0 v1 . . . vn, s], for some state r in Q, for some tape pattern v0 v1 . . . vn that lies in An+1, such that n≦|Q| and 0≦s≦n. In the outer loop of 8.34, when r is selected from Q and in the inner loop when the tape pattern a−|Q| . . . a−2 a−1 a0 a1 a2 . . . a|Q| is selected from A2|Q|+1 such that
then the machine execution in 8.34 will construct prime directed edge ΔΓ.
When the head node is a halting node, the machine execution must halt in at most |Q| steps. Otherwise, it would visit a non-halting state twice and thus, be a non-halting head node. The rest of the argument for this halting node is the same as for the non-halting head node. See
Given Turing Machine (Q, A, η) as input, the method works as follows.
Proof.
|Φ(1)|=|P|. Analyzing the nested loops, in method 8.36
For each edge sequence E([p1, p2, . . . , pk], k) chosen from Φ(k), at most |P| new edge sequences are put in Φ(k+1). Thus |Φ(k+1)|≦|P∥Φ(k)|, so |Φ(k)|≦|P|k.
When (Q, A, η) is a periodic machine. method 8.36 terminates in a finite number of steps with either a consecutive repeating state cycle or for some positive integer J, then Φ(J) =Ø
Proof.
If (Q, A, η) has at least one configuration (q. k. T) that is an immortal point, then by definition 8.42. this implies the existence of a periodic point p with some finite period N.
Thus, from lemma 7.10, there is a consecutive repeating state cycle that corresponds to the immortal periodic orbit of p. Since method 8.36 searches through all possible prime edge sequences of length k, a consecutive repeating state cycle will be found that is contained in a prime directed edge sequence with length at most 2N. Thus, this immortal periodic point of period N will be reached before or while computing Φ(2N).
Otherwise, (Q, A, η) does not have any configurations with an immortal orbit; in other words, for every configuration, (Q, A, η) halts in a finite number of steps.
Claim: There is a positive integer J such that every edge sequence terminates while executing method 8.36. By reductio absurdum, suppose not. Then there is at least one infinite prime directed edge sequence that exists: this corresponds to an immortal orbit, which contradicts that (Q, A, η) does not have any configuration with an immortal orbit.
The next few definitions are paraphrased or directly stated from [HOOPER].
A tape with designated scanned symbol and an internal state of the Turing Machine together constitute an instantaneous description (ID) of the Turing Machine. Recall from definitions 2.1, and 2.2 that given Turing Machine (Q, A, η), and tape T, where T: Z→A, then a configuration is an element (q, k, T) for some state q in Q and for some tape head location k in Z. Observe that Hooper's scanned symbol and our tape head location represent the same meaning. Thus, Hooper's instantaneous description is equivalent to the definition of a Turing Machine configuration.
If a configuration (ID) upon execution of Turing Machine (Q, A, η) halts after a finite number of computational steps, then it is called a mortal configuration (mortal ID). Otherwise a configuration (ID) is called immortal.
Turing Machine (Q, A, η) is called a halting machine if it contains only mortal (halting) configurations.
A Turing machine (Q, Q, η) that has at least one periodic configuration. whenever it has an immortal configuration is said to be a periodic Turing machine.
This follows immediately from theorem 8.38 and method 8.36.
The classic result of Turing machine theory is the undecidability of the problem of determining for a given configuration of a Turing machine (Q, A, η) is whether this configuration is immortal or mortal. This is called the halting problem.
The immortality problem is the problem of deciding for a given Turing machine (Q, A, η) whether it is a halting machine; in other words, determining whether an immortal configuration exists for the machine (Q, A, η).
In the next section, a complete description of a dynamic register machine program, called an IDRM, is presented. This embodiment of a computing system implements methods 8.34 and 8.36, which includes method 8.32. In this section, the design of this machine is explained from a human-friendly perspective. This section describes how the Turing machine (Q, A, η) is represented and where it is located in the registers of the IDRM. This section also describes how methods 8.34 and 8.36 are implemented and executed by the IDRM program.
In section 11, the complete formal description of the IDRM is a program of 1590 instructions composed from the Constant (C m n), Successor (S m), Transfer (T m n), Address (A m n), Jump (J m n q), Delete (D m n), and Update (U m n q) Instructions. With a valid Turing Machine as input in its registers, this IDRM solves the Turing Immortality problem after a finite number of execution steps.
The states Q of machine (Q, A, η) are represented with the natural numbers {1, 2, . . . , |Q|}. The alphabet symbols are represented with natural numbers {1, 2, . . . , |A|}. The function n determines all the Turing machine commands. A Turing machine command is of the form (q a r b m) where 2≦q≦|Q|, where 1≦r≦|Q|, where 1≦a, b≦|A| and where 1≦m≦2. The variable m=1 represents a left tape head move and m=2 represents a right tape head move. As described in definition 2.1, the design of the IDRM assumes that 1 with respect to Q is the halting state. This is why q≦2.
Registers 0 to 155 are reserved for computation, program flow and important constants. The design of the IDRM assumes that registers 156 through 160 contain the first Turing machine command which is of the form (2 1 r b m). Further, it is assumed that the instructions for the Turing machine are dictionary ordered over the first two coordinates. In other words, each Turing machine command of the form (q a r b m) is stored as follows:
The initial register contents starting at register 156 are shown in the table:
This means register 157 contains a 1; register 158 contains r21; register 159 contains b21 register 160 contains m21; register (160+5|A|) contains m31 and so on.
The ∅ in register number 5(|Q|−1)|A|+156 indicates the end of the Turing machine program. At the beginning of program execution, the design of the IDRM assumes that register 0 contains the address 5(|Q|−1)|A|+156. In other words, (R ∅)=5(|Q|−1)|A|+156. This assumption is made so that the IDRM can determine if the Turing machine program is presented in a valid format in registers 156 through register 5(|Q|−1)|A|+155. This is analogous to the notion of a well-formed formula in mathematical logic. See [ENDERTON].
Overall, the purpose of instructions 0 to 296 in the IDRM program is to check that the Turing machine (Q, A, η) is stored in a valid format starting at register 156 and to set up registers for specific purposes based on |Q| and |A| in machine. Overall, the purpose of instructions 297 to 857 in the IDRM is to construct a linked list of all, if any exist, the prime directed edges of the given Turing Machine (Q, A, whose command set starts at register 156. These 858 instructions execute method 8.34. After the prime directed edge search method described in 8.34 is completed, instructions 858 to 1589 of the IDRM program execute the immortal periodic point search method 8.36. Next, further details of the IDRM program are discussed.
Instructions 0 through 126 in the IDRM determine whether the Turing machine represented in registers 156 through register (5(|Q|−1)|A|+155) is in a valid format. If not, then execution of the IDRM jumps to instruction 1570 and writes “ERROR TURING PROGRAM” in registers 0 through 19 using the ASCII code representation. In other words, 65 corresponds to “A”; 69 corresponds to “E”; 82 corresponds to “R” and so on. By doing this valid format checking, it assures that the execution of the IDRM always terminates regardless of the initial contents of the registers in the IDRM.
Observe that rather than omitting a Turing machine command, as this is the convention in [TURING] and [DAVIS], if η(q, a) halts, the IDRM uses the convention (q a 1 b m) to represent this halting instruction as specified in section 2. Precisely, the natural number q is stored in register 5(q−1)a+151; the number a is stored in register 5(q−1)a+152; 1 is stored in register 5(q−1)a+153; b is stored in register 5(q−1)a+154; and m is stored in register 5(q−1)a+155.
After the ∅ in register (5(|Q|−1)|A|+156) there are four unused registers, followed by the A offsets: A2, A3, . . . , A|Q|. The A offsets are used to help the IDRM more effectively lookup the next Turing command based on the prior state and tape symbol. The A offsets are determined and stored by instructions 127 through 153 of the IDRM.
After the A offsets, some registers are used to store information necessary to do the prime edge computations for each tape pattern element. The location of these registers are based on the values of |A| and |Q|. In more detail, instructions 154 through 296 set up a scratch pad of registers needed to execute method 8.34 i.e. the finding and storing of all prime directed edges of (Q, A, η)—if any exist. In particular, instructions 154 through 167 set up registers to record the current prime input command sequence. Instructions 168 to 190 set up registers to record the current prospective head node. Instructions 191 to 212 set up registers to record the current prospective tail node.
Instructions 213 to 233 set up registers to record the execution tape during the computation of a prospective prime directed edge. Instructions 234 to 254 set up registers to store an iteration tape, which is used to iterate through every tape pattern in A2|Q|+1. Instructions 255 to 265 set up registers to record the tape head moves during the computation of the prospective prime edge. Instructions 266 to 292 set up registers to compute the window of execution. Instructions 293 to 296 set up memory pointers to record the number of prime edges found so far and store a linked list of prime edges. In instruction 296, a free heap pointer is stored in register 155.
For each non-halting state q in Q and for each tape pattern in A2|Q|+1 the IDRM program executes machine (Q, A, η) for at most n≦|Q| computational steps of the Turing machine. As a result, this particular tape pattern and starting state q form a prime directed edge or they do not. If they do, the prime directed edge is stored in a prime edge linked list.
Each element (node) in the prime edge linked list is stored contiguously in registers as follows: next_node, pe_number, h_node, t_node, s_node, n, q, s, s_p, v0, v1 . . . vn, r, t, t_p, w0, w1 . . . wn, 2N, (q, vs), (q1, a1) . . . (qN, aN)
In other words, if next_node is stored in register 7000, then pe_number is stored in register 7001. h_node is stored in register 7002. t_node is stored in register 7003. s_node is stored in register 7004. n is stored in register 7005. q is stored in register 7006. s is stored in register 7007. s_p is stored in register 7008 and so on.
Now that the data structure for representing and storing prime directed edges in the registers has been described, more detail is provided on the instructions 297 to 857 that execute the prime directed edge search method.
In particular, instructions 297 to 313 initialize the tape pattern in A2|Q|+1 to all 1's. Instruction 314 begins the outer loop that iterates from state 2 up to state |Q|. This is the outer for loop in method 8.34, expressed as: For each non-halting state q in Q.
Instructions 331 to 349 copy the iterated tape pattern, starting at the register pointed to by register 68. Instruction 334 stores the value of 2|Q|+1 in register 2. Instructions 350 to 367 initialize the prospective head node state and the tape symbols. Instructions 371 to 395 initialize register 33 to the correct command (q a r b m) in the Turing command table. The current state q of the Turing machine is stored in register 65. The current tape symbol a is stored in register 66.
Instructions 396 to 408 store (qk ak) in the register that is pointed to by the contents of register 51. Instructions 409 to 483 execute one computational step of the Turing machine whose command table starts at register 156. Instruction 484 increments register 48 which stores the number of computational steps for this prospective prime directed edge.
Instructions 485 to 496 check to see if state qk+1 has already been visited. If so, the program execution jumps to instruction 497. Instructions 497 to 509 store (qN aN) starting at the register pointed to by the contents of register 51. Instructions 510 to 550 compute the window of execution. Instructions 551 to 578 increment the tape pattern which is an element of A2|Q|+1. This enables the program to search every element in A2|Q|+1 as a prospective head node.
Instructions 579 to 778 copy this new prime directed edge found to the end of the prime directed edge linked list, whose data structure format has already been described.
Instructions 779 and 780 update the prime directed edge linked list pointers. Instructions 781 to 839 check if the new head node just found is the same as the head node at the end of the prime directed edge linked list. If yes, then the new prime directed edge is the same as the last one found and it is ignored.
Otherwise, the prime directed edge just found is new and so it is added to the end of the prime directed edge linked list. This is performed in instructions 840 to 854. The number of prime directed edges found so far is incremented in instruction 855.
Instructions 856 and 857 cause program execution to jump back to instruction 314, where the next tape pattern is examined to decide if the current state and the new tape pattern determine a new prime directed edge. When the tape pattern reaches all 1's again, instructions 328, 329 and 330 increment the state q and the next prime directed edge is searched for. Once all states have been exhausted up to the last state value then the program jumps to instruction 858 where the immortal periodic search method 8.36 starts.
After the prime directed edge search method described in 8.34 is completed, instructions 858 to 1589 of the IDRM program execute the immortal periodic point search method 8.36. Following the notation of 8.36, Φ(k) is the set of all edge sequences of length k. The IDRM program, represents Φ(1), the set of prime directed edges as a linked list where each node is in square brackets:
The above representation of Φ(1) is constructed by the execution of instructions 858 to 1016 of the IDRM program. In other words, in method 8.36, the expression Set Φ(1)={E([1], 1), E([2], 1), . . . , E([|P|], 1)} is executed by instructions 858 to 1016.
In more detail, instructions 858 to 875 set up an array of m prime edge pointers. Instructions 876 and 877 test if register 0 contains m, the number of prime directed edges. Instructions 878 to 885 initialize registers so that register 33 points to the next prime directed edge pointer, register 155 points to the free heap, and register 99 points to the head node of the edge sequence linked list. Also, register 97 is initialized to 1 which stores the number of distinct prime edges composed together in every element of Φ(1) i.e. the 1 in Φ(1). Register 96 is initialized to 1 which stores at that time during program execution the number of edge sequences in Φ(k). Instructions 886 and 887 test if the program is finished with constructing Φ(1).
Instructions 888 to 903 set up the h_node, t_node, and s_node pointers. Instructions 904 to 910 store state rj. Instructions 911 to 918 store idxj. Instructions 919 to 926 store ubj. Instructions 927 to 938 store lb_ptrj. Instructions 939 to 945 compute idx_ptrj. Instructions 946 to 951 store idx_ptrj. Instructions 952 to 957 compute ub_ptrj. Instructions 958 to 963 store ub_ptrj. Instructions 964 to 969 store p1,j which equals j. Instructions 970 to 987 store w0,j, . . . widx,j . . . wub,j. Instructions 988 to 1004 store (q0,j, a0,j), (q1,j, a1,j), . . . , (qNj,j, aNj,j). Instructions 1005 to 1016 update pointers and registers to jump back to instruction 886 and repeat this loop for the j+1st prime edge that is stored in 5(1).
After Φ(1) is constructed, instruction 1018 is the start of the loop where Φ(k+1) is constructed from Φ(k). Instruction 1018 corresponds to the beginning of the while loop while (Φ(k)≠Ø) in method 8.36. In particular, if Φ(k)=Ø is executed by instructions 1021 and 1022. If Φ(k)=Ø, then the IDRM program jumps to instruction 1551. After this the program writes “HALT” in registers 0 through 4 using the ASCII code representation. Then the IDRM program jumps to instruction 1590 which does not exist and this terminates the execution.
Instruction 1028 corresponds to the beginning of the for loop
for each E([p1, p2, . . . , pk], k) in Φ(k) in method 8.36.
Instruction 1032 corresponds to the beginning of the for loop: for each prime directed edge ΔjΓj in P in method 8.36.
In regard to if ΔjΓj link matches with Πp(k) in method 8.36, instructions 1070 to 1461 test for an overlap match between the current prime edge found and the execution node Πp(k) in the loop starting at instruction 1032.
if E([p1, p2, . . . , pk, pk+1], k+1) contains a consecutive repeating state cycle in method 8.36 is executed in instructions 1475 to 1537 of the IDRM program. Instructions 1475 to 1537 look for a consecutive repeating state cycle in (q0,j, a0,j), (q1,j, a1,j), . . . , (qNj,j, aNj,j)
If a consecutive repeating state cycle is found, the program jumps to instruction 1557. Then it writes “IMMORTAL” in registers 0 through 7 using the ASCII code representation. After the program writes the length of one repeat of the consecutive repeating state cycle in register 8. After the program writes the starting register of the first repeat of the state cycle in register 9 and writes the starting register of the second repeat of the state cycle in register 10. Then the IDRM program jumps to instruction 1590 which does not exist and this terminates the execution.
Next the representation of Φ(k) in the registers of the IDRM program is discussed. Similar to Φ(1) the jth element in Φ(k) is of the form:
This section presents a complete formal description of a dynamic register machine program, called the IDRM, that determines for a periodic Turing Machine, whether it is a halting machine or contains an immortal periodic configuration. This embodiment of a computing system is achieved with a program composed of 1590 instructions that are selected from the Constant (C m n), Successor (S m), Transfer (T m n), Address (A m n), Jump (J m n q), Delete (D m n), and Update (U m n q) Instructions. Mathematical concepts and computational methods are described in sections 1 through 8. The dynamic register machine instructions and program execution were described in section 0. The design of this program has been described in section 9.
Due to the lack of space and USPTO font requirements, the program comments are listed first rather than next to or above the program instruction, which is a common practice in computer programs.
In instruction number 0, register 0 stores the register number of the terminating zero register that indicates the end of the Turing program. In instruction number 3, register 21 stores the jump address which is 6. In instruction number 3, check if terminating zero register contains zero. If not, exit IDRM program with ERROR in TURING PROGRAM.
In instruction 6, the terminating zero register is ok. Now check that this register number is >156 where stored the Turing program begins. In instruction 10, test if terminating register <=156, then exit ERROR TURING PROGRAM. In instruction number 14, register 21 stores the jump address. In instruction 16, prepare to find the maximum alphabet and state values in Turing program, In instruction 17, register 30 stores the maximum alphabet value. In instruction 18, register 29 stores the maximum state value.
In instruction 21, register 34 contains state q in Turing command (q a r b m). In instruction 23, register 35 contains alphabet symbol a in Turing command (q a r b m). In instruction number 25, register 36 contains state r in Turing command (q a r b m). In instruction number 27, register 37 contains alphabet symbol b in Turing command (q a r b m). In instruction 29, register 38 contains move symbol m in Turing command (q a r b m). In instruction 31, if state q=0, then end of valid Turing program or invalid program. In instruction 33, store new state value from Turing program in register 0. In instruction 34, register 29 contains the current maximum state value. In instruction 35, register 20 stores the continue address 38 after the maximum subroutine exit.
Instructions 36 and 37 jump to program instruction 109 where the maximum subroutine starts. Instruction 38 copies the new maximum state value from register 2 into register 29. In instructions 41 and 42, if alphabet symbol a=0 in (q a r b m), then jump to instruction 1570 where “Error Turing program” is written to registers 0 through 19 in ASCII format.
In instruction 42, store new alphabet a value in (q a r b m) from Turing program in register 0. In instruction 43, store current maximum alphabet value in register 1. In instruction 44, register 20 stores the continue address 47 after max subroutine exit. In instruction 46, jump to program instruction 109 where the max subroutine starts. In instruction 47, copy new maximum alphabet value from register 2 into register 30.
In instructions 49 and 50, if state value r=0, (q a r b m), exit with ERROR. It is an invalid Turing program. In instruction 51, store current state r from Turing command in register 0. In instruction 51, store maximum state in register 0. In instruction 53, register 20 stores the continue address 56 after max subroutine exit. In instruction 56, copy new maximum state value from register 2 into register 29. In instruction 59, if symbol b=0, in (q a r b m) exit with ERROR, Invalid Turing program.
In instruction 60, store new alphabet “b” value in (q a r b m) from Turing program in register 0. In instruction 61, store current maximum alphabet value in register 1. In instruction 64, jump to program instruction 109 where the max subroutine starts. In instruction 65, copy new maximum alphabet value from register 2 into register 30. In instruction 68, check if move symbol m=1, LEFT move, in (q a r b m). In instruction 71, check if move symbol m=2, RIGHT move, in (q a r b m).
In instruction 72, if an invalid move symbol, exit with ERROR. Invalid Turing program In instruction 74, increment reg 33 to indirectly point to q in next (q a r b m) command. In instruction 76, jump to Line 21 to start checking the next command (q a r b m). In instruction 77, Turing program commands start at register 156.
Starting at instruction 78, now that maximum state and alphabet values are determined use these in a state and alphabet loop to check that there is a valid Turing program starting at register 156. In instruction 83, start Q_count loop. Q_COUNT is iterated from 2 to MAX Q. The halt state is represented with 1, so Q_COUNT is initialized to 2. In instruction 87, the start of alphabet A_COUNT loop. The alphabet symbols ranges from 1 to |A|=MAX_A. In instruction 90, store q from (q a r b m) command in register 34. In instruction 92, store a in command (q a r b m) in register 35.
In instruction 98, check that q=Q_COUNT in register 23. In instruction 100, if (q!=Q_COUNT), then it is an invalid Turing program. Exit with ERROR. In instruction 102, check that a=A_COUNT in register 25. In instruction 104, if (a!=A_COUNT), then it is an invalid Turing program. Exit with ERROR.
In instruction 105, register 18 stores the number of insert instructions for Update (U m 18 q). In instruction 106, register 19 stores the number of instructions to delete in (D m 19). In instruction 107, line 127 is where the A_OFFSETS program is located. In instruction 108, jump to A_offsets.
Starting at instruction 109, the MAXIMUM program, compares registers 0 and 1. It returns the maximum of registers 0 and 1 in register 2.
The A_offsets are determined and stored by instructions 127 to 153. In particular, the A_offsets A—2, A—3, . . . , A_|Q| are stored at (R (R 39)), (R (+ (R 39) 1)), and so on. In instruction 128, register 156 contains 2 which is the first Turing command (2 1 r b m) in a valid Turing program. In instruction 135, offset A_k is stored in the next register, with A—2 in (R (R 39)). In instruction 138, add 5 to register 0 so that it points to the next Turing command (q a r b m).
Instructions 154 to 296 set up a scratch pad of registers to execute prime directed edge search method 8.34 described in section 8. Instructions 154 to 167 set up registers to record the prime input command sequence. Instructions 168 to 190 set up registers to record current prospective head node. Instructions 191 to 212 set up registers to record the current prospective tail node. Instructions 213 to 233 set up registers to record the execution tape during the computation of a prospective prime directed edge.
Instructions 234 to 254 set up registers to store an iteration tape, which is used to iterate through every tape patter in A2|Q|+1. Instructions 255 to 265 set up registers to record the tape head moves during computation of the prospective prime edge. Instructions 266 to 292 set up registers to compute the window of execution.
Instructions 293 to 296 set up memory pointers to record the number of prime edges found so far and store a linked list of prime edges. In Instruction 296 a free heap pointer is stored in register 155. Instructions 297 to 858 perform the Prime directed edge search method as defined in 8.34 Instructions 297 to 313 initialize the tape A2|Q|+1 to all 1's. Instructions 331 to 349 copy the iterated tape pattern, starting at the register pointed to by register 68. Instruction 334 stores the value of 2|Q|+1 in register 2. Instructions 350 to 367 initialize the prospective head node state and the tape symbols. Instructions 371 to 395 initialize register 33 to the correct command (q a r b m) in the Turing command table. The current state q of the Turing machine is stored in register 65. The current tape symbol a is stored in register 66. Instructions 396 to 408 store (qk, ak) in the register that is pointed to by the contents of register 51. Instructions 409 to 483 execute one computational step of the Turing machine whose command table starts at register 156.
Instruction 484 increments register 48 which stores the number of computational steps for this prospective prime directed edge. Instructions 485 to 496 check to see if state qk+1 has already been visited. If state qk+1 has already been visited, jump to 497.
Instructions 497 to 509 store (qN, aN) starting at the register pointed to by the contents of register 51. Instructions 510 to 550 compute the window of execution. Instructions 551 to 578 increment the tape pattern which is an element of A2|Q|+1. This enables the program to search every element in A2|Q|+1 as a prospective head node.
Instructions 579 to 778 copy this new prime directed edge found to the end of the prime directed edge linked list. Instructions 779 and 780 update the prime directed edge linked list pointers. Instructions 781 to 839 check if the new head node just found is the same as the head node at the end of the prime directed edge linked list. If yes, then the new prime directed edge is the same as the last one found and it is ignored.
The prime directed edge just found is new and so it is added to the end of the primed directed edge linked list. This occurs in instructions 840 to 854. The number of prime directed edges found so far is incremented and stored in register 81. In instruction 857, Jump back to instruction 314 where the next tape pattern is examined to decide if the current state and new tape pattern determine a new prime directed edge. Instructions 858 to 875 set up an array of m prime edge pointers.
Instructions 876, 877 test if register 0 contains m, the number of prime directed edges. Instructions 878 to 885 initialize registers so that register 33 points to the next prime directed edge pointer, register 155 points to the free heap, and register 99 points to the head node of the edge sequence linked list. In instruction 884, Register 96 stores the number of current edge sequences in E(k). In instruction 885, register 97 is initialized to 1 and stores the number of distinct prime edges composed together in every element of E(1).
Instructions 888 to 903 set up the h_node, t_node and s_node pointers. Instructions 904 to 910 store state r_j. Instructions 911 to 918 store idx_j. Instructions 919 to 926 store ub_j. Instructions 927 to 938 store lb_ptr_j. Instructions 939 to 945 compute idx_ptr_j. Instructions 946 to 951 store idx_ptr_j. Instructions 952 to 957 compute ub_ptr_j. Instructions 958 to 963 store ub_ptr_j. Instructions 964 to 969 store p1,j which equals j. Instructions 970 to 987 store w0,j . . . widx,j . . . wub,j. Instructions 988 to 1004 store (q0,j, a0,j) . . . (qNj,j, aNj,j). Instructions 1005 to 1016 update pointers and pointers to jump back to instruction 886. In instructions 1015 and 1016, the program jumps back to instruction 886 and repeats this loop for the j+1st prime edge that is stored in E(1). Instruction 1018 is the start of the loop where E(k+1) is constructed from E(k). In instructions 1021 and 1022, check if E(k)=empty set i.e. if the number of edge sequences=0. If E(k)=empty set, jump to instruction 1551 and write HALT, using the ASCII representation, in registers 0 to 4.
Instruction 1028 corresponds to the start of for loop: for each E([p1, p2, . . . pk], k) in E(k) in method 8.34. Instruction 1032 is the beginning of the for loop: for each prime directed edge (ΔjΓj) in prime edge set P
if ΔjΓj link matches with Πp(k) then in method 8.34 is executed starting at instruction 1070. Instructions 1070 to 1461 test for an overlap match between the current prime edge found in the loop beginning at instruction 1032 and the execution node. Instructions 1475 to 1537 search for a consecutive repeating state cycle in (q0,j, a0,j), (q1,j, a1,j) . . . (qNJj, aNJj). if E([p1, p2, . . . , pk], k+1) contains a consecutive repeating state cycle, as stated in 8.34, is executed in instructions 1475 to 1537.
Instruction 1551 is reached if the Turing machine was valid and it is a halting machine. Instruction 1551 stores “H” in register 0. ASCII code 72=“H”. Instruction 1552 stores “A” in register 1. ASCII code 65=“A”. Instruction 1553 stores “L” in register 2. ASCII code 76=“L”. Instruction 1554 stores “T” in register 3. ASCII code 84=“T”. Instruction 1555 stores address 1590 in register 21. And instruction 1556 jumps to end of the IDRM program.
Instruction 1557 is reached if the Turing machine was valid and it has an immortal periodic point. Instruction 1557 stores “I” in register 0. ASCII code 73=“I”. Instruction 1558 stores “M” in register 1. ASCII code 77=“M”. Instruction 1559 stores “M” in register 2. ASCII code 77=“M”. Instruction 1560 stores “O” in register 3. ASCII code 79=“O”. Instruction 1561 stores “R” in register 4. ASCII code 82=“R”. Instruction 1562 stores “T” in register 5. ASCII code 84=“T”. Instruction 1563 stores “A” in register 6. ASCII code 65=“A”. Instruction 1564 stores “L” in register 7. ASCII code 76=“L”. Instruction 1565 stores the length of one repeat of the consecutive repeating state cycle. Instruction 1566 stores the register where the first repeat of the state cycle begins. Instruction 1567 stores the register where the second repeat of the state cycle begins. Instruction 1568 stores address 1590 in register 21. Instruction 1569 jumps to the end of the IDRM program.
Instruction 1570 is reached if the Turing program is in an invalid format. Instruction 1570 stores “E” in register 0. ASCII code 69=“E”. Instruction 1571 stores “R” in register 1. ASCII code 82=“R”. Instruction 1572 stores “R” in register 2. ASCII code 82=“R”. Instruction 1573 stores “O” in register 3. ASCII code 79=“O”. Instruction 1574 stores “R” in register 4. ASCII code 82=“R”. Instruction 1575 stores “ ” in register 5. ASCII code 32=“ ”. Instructions 1576 through 1589 store “TURING PROGRAM” in registers 6 through 19, using ASCII format as described in the previous instructions.
The complete IDRM program description starts on the next page. The first column shows the instruction number starting at 0. The second column shows the dynamic register machine instruction.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4555796 | Sakoe | Nov 1985 | A |
4961005 | Salam | Oct 1990 | A |
5148514 | Arima et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5216752 | Tam | Jun 1993 | A |
5303328 | Masui et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325464 | Pechanek et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5481644 | Inazumi | Jan 1996 | A |
5832466 | Feldgajer | Nov 1998 | A |
6169771 | Shou et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6256619 | Grichnik | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292586 | Kawakami et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6470261 | Ng et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6601053 | Schaffer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6678548 | Echauz et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6704757 | Ohmi et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6934938 | May et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7162032 | Brekne | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7249116 | Fiske | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7398260 | Fiske | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7623468 | Panigrahy et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8010467 | Fiske | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019705 | Fiske | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8712942 | Fiske | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8817981 | Fiske | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020038294 | Matsugu | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020059154 | Rodvold | May 2002 | A1 |
20030183878 | Tajiri et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212645 | Schaffer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040162795 | Dougherty et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050075702 | Shafer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060236226 | Meijer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245225 | Vorbach | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259894 | Fiske | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277533 | Fiske | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014394 | Harder et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070061777 | Vashi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079108 | Fiske | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070288668 | Fiske | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20110066833 | Fiske | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110274273 | Fiske | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120198560 | Fiske | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2007008519 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2012106383 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
G. Michael Schneider and Judith L. Gersting, CSC150 chapter 11: Models of computation, Turing Machines and State transition diagrams, Course Technology 2007, 5 pages. |
Peter J. Angeline et al. “An Evolutionary Algorithm that Constructs Recurrent Neural Networks. ” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 5, No. 1, Jan. 1994, pp. 54-65. |
Farooq Azam “Biologically Inspired Modular Neural Networks” PhD Dissertation. Virginia Tech. May 2000. c Farooq Azam, 2000. pp. 1-149. |
Dipankar Dasgupta et al. “Designing Application-Specific Neural Networks using the Structured Genetic Algorithm” IEEE Computer Society Press, Jun. 6, 1992. pp. 1-11. |
John G. Elias. “Genetic Generation of Connection Patterns for a Dynamic Artificial Neural Network” Proceedings of the Combinations of Genetic Algorithms and Neural Networks Workshop, COGANN 92. pp. 1-17. |
Dario Floreano et al. “Evolution of Spiking Neural Controllers for Autonomous Vision-Based Robots” T. Gomi (Ed.): ER 2001, LCNS 2217, pp. 38-61, 2001. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001. |
G. Michael Schneider and Judith L Gersting , CSC150 chapter 11: Models of computation, Turing Machines and State transition diagrams, An Invitation To Course Technology 2007, pp. 1-6. |
John C. Gallagher, et al “Continuous Time Recurrent Neural Networks: A Paradigm for Evolvable Analog Controller Circuits” 2000. pp. 1-6. |
Takashi Kanamaru, et al. “Stochastic resonance in a pulse neural network with a propagational time delay” BioSystems 58 (2000) pp. 101-107. |
Kirstian Lingren et al. “Regular Language Inference Using Evolving Neural Networks” IEEE 1992. pp. 1-13. |
loana Domnica Marian “A biologically inspired model of motor control of direction” MS Thesis. University College Dublin, Ireland. Oct. 2002. pp. 1-209. |
Alan F. Murray, et al. “Pulse-Stream VLSI Neural Networks Mixing Analog and Digital Techniques.” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 2, No. 2, Mar. 1991. pp. 193-204. |
L.M. Reyneri, “Theoretical and Implementation Aspects of Pulse Streams: an Overview” 1999. pp. 1-12. |
Xin Yao, “Evolving Artificial Neural Networks.” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, No. 9, Sep. 1999. pp. 1423-1447. |
Supplementary European Search Report of European Patent Application No. EP05849368; search date: Jul. 15, 2009. |
International Search Report of Application No. PCT/US05/41799; mailed on Feb. 13, 2007. |
Supplementary European Search Report of European Patent Application No. EP05854862; search date: Jan. 11, 2010. |
International Search Report of Application No. PCT/US05/46215; mailed on Jun. 26, 2008. |
Supplemental Partial European Search Report of European Patent Application No. EP05858695; search date: Sep. 16, 2011. |
International Search Report of Application No. PCT/US05/44660; mailed on Dec. 19, 2007. |
Supplementary European Search Report of European Patent Application No. EP06748170; search date: Dec. 14, 2012. |
International Search Report of Application No. PCT/US06/02271; mailed on May 29, 2007. |
Supplemental Partial European Search Report of European Patent Application No. EP06786344; search date: Jan. 22, 2010. |
International Search Report of Application No. PCT/US06/26159; mailed on Feb. 1, 2008. |
International Search Report of Application No. PCT/US2012/023408; mailed on Aug. 22, 2012. |
International Search Report of Application No. PCT/US2012/056786; mailed on Mar. 29, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110066833 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |