Exhaust devices, such as exhaust hoods and ventilated ceilings, are used to remove pollutants from occupied spaces with sources of pollutants. Examples include factories, kitchens, workshops, and food courts which contain industrial processes, kitchens appliances, tools, and portable cooking appliances, respectively. Preferably, exhaust hoods remove pollutants by drawing them from a collection area near the source and may also provide a containment function, usually by ensuring that the velocity of exhaust is sufficient near the source to overcome any local buoyancy or draft effects to ensure that all pollutants are prevented from escaping to the general occupied space. By managing transients in this way, an effective capture zone is provided.
In exhaust systems, an exhaust blower creates a negative pressure zone to draw pollutants and air directly away from the pollutant source. In kitchen applications, the exhaust generally draws pollutants, including room-air, through a filter and out of the kitchen through a duct system. A variable speed fan may be used to adjust the exhaust flow rate to match the extant requirements for capture and containment. That is, depending on the rate by which the effluent is created and the buildup of effluent near the pollutant source, the speed of exhaust blower may be manually set to minimize the flow rate at the lowest point which achieves capture and containment.
The exhaust rate required to achieve full capture and containment is governed by the highest transient load pulses that occur. This requires the exhaust rate to be higher than the average volume of effluent (which is inevitably mixed with entrained air). Such transients can be caused by gusts in the surrounding space and/or turbulence caused by plug flow (the warm plume of effluent rising due to buoyancy). Thus, for full capture and containment, the effluent must be removed through the exhaust blower operating at a high enough speed to capture all transients, including the rare pulses in exhaust load. Providing a high exhaust rate—a brute force approach—is associated with energy loss since conditioned air must be drawn out of the space in which the exhaust hood is located. Further, high volume operation increases the cost of operating the exhaust blower and raises the noise level of the ventilation system.
Also known are “make up” air systems, some of which have been proposed to be combined with exhaust hoods in a manner in which make-up air is propelled toward the exhaust intake of a hood. This “short circuit” system involves an output blower that supplies and directs one, or a combination of, conditioned and unconditioned air toward the exhaust hood and blower assembly. Such “short circuit” systems have not proven to reduce the volume of conditioned air needed to achieve full capture and containment under a given load condition.
Another solution in the prior art is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,475,534 titled “Ventilating System for Kitchen.” In this patent, the inventor describes an air outlet in the front end of the hood that discharges a relatively low velocity stream of air downwardly. According to the description, the relatively low velocity air stream forms a curtain of air to prevent conditioned air from being drawn into the hood. In the invention, the air outlet in the front end of the hood assists with separating a portion of the conditioned air away from the hood. Other sources of air directed towards the hood create a venturi effect, as described in the short circuit systems above. As diagramed in the figures of the patent, the exhaust blower must “suck up” air from numerous air sources, as well as the effluent-laden air. Also the use of a relatively low velocity air stream necessitates a larger volume of air flow from the air outlet to overcome the viscous effects that the surrounding air will have on the flow.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,346,692 titled “Make-Up Air Device for Range Hood,” the inventor describes a typical short circuit system that relies on a venturi effect to remove a substantial portion of the effluent. The patent also illustrates the use of diverter vanes or louvers to direct the air source in a downwardly direction. Besides the problems associated with such short circuit systems described above, the invention also utilizes vanes to direct the air flow of the output blower. The use of vanes with relatively large openings, through which the air is propelled, requires a relatively large air volume flow to create a substantial air velocity output. This large, air volume flow must be sucked up by the exhaust blower, which increases the rate by which conditioned air leaves the room. The large, air volume flow also creates large scale turbulence, which can increase the rate by which the effluent disperses to other parts of the room.
Currently, in workplaces where fumes, dust, or chemical vapors present a hazard, local exhaust ventilation devices are used to prevent workers from inhaling contaminated air. Generally, an exterior exhaust hood, for example, a receiving hood, is disposed above the emission source to remove airborne contaminants. However, theoretical capture efficiency of such a receiving hood holds only in still air, the capture efficiency decreases due to crosswind in the surrounding environment, no matter how weak the crosswind is. To control the adverse effect of crosswind, a fume hood having a back panel, two side panels, and a hood sash in the front has been designed to replace a receiving hood. However, the side panels and hood sash of a fume hood limit the size of operation space for operators' upper limbs. Therefore, how to eliminate the adverse effect of crosswind, and meanwhile retain the freedom of operators' upper limbs, becomes a key topic to a receiving hood.
In order to accomplish the key topic, U.S. Pat. No. 4,788,905, published on Dec. 6, 1988, disclosed a combination cooking, heating and ventilating system. The system contains an open fire grill surrounded by an unperforated griddle, both of which are surrounded by an eating counter. A fan is positioned below the cooking grill and griddle which forces the air upward between the eating counter and the griddle in the shape of an air curtain for removing hot smoking air from the cooking area. However, due to the limited size, the fan is not applicable in a large-scale worktable. Further, generally speaking, there is not necessarily enough space to accommodate the fan device below the worktable.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,042,456, published on Aug. 27, 1991, disclosed an air canopy ventilation system. The system comprises a surface having two substantially parallel spaced apart side panels surmounted at their respective upper edges by a canopy. A vent means having a plurality of outlets extends between the side panels and substantially the whole length of the front edge of the surface. A fan means connected to the vent means is adapted to drive a flow of air through the vent means upwardly to form a curtain of air over the front of the system, thereby entraining within the area fumes and odors. The upwardly flowing air, fumes and odors are removed by an exhaust means. Though the system can solve the problem of the lateral diffusion of the smoke and the influence of the crosswind, the air flow perpendicular to the side panel affects the efficiencies of the upward air curtain and canopy. Meanwhile, the structure of the system having the side panel and back panel limits the size of the operation space in which the operator can operate.
Further, U.S. Pat. No. 6,450,879, published on Sep. 17, 2002, disclosed an air curtain generator includes a casing with a fan received therein so as to blow an air curtain from opening of the casing, and the air curtain separates the workers and the source where generates contaminated air. However, the air curtain only isolates the smoke from laterally diffusing towards the operator, but does not isolate the smoke from diffusing towards the side without the air curtain generator. Additionally, the inventor of the present invention disclosed an air curtain generator in U.S. Pat. No. 6,752,144 published on Jun. 22, 2004, and the present invention is a continued invention along the lines of this patent.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,851,421, an exhaust hood has a vertical curtain jet which helps to prevent the escape of pollutants in the vicinity of the source. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,811,724 and 5,220,910 describe a canopy type exhaust hood with a horizontal jet to enhance capture. In one the latter, general ventilation air is provided on a side face of the canopy hood. U.S. Pat. No. 5,063,834 describes a system in which a ceiling-level ventilation zone is created to remove unducted fumes from exhaust hoods. U.S. Pat. No. 4,903,894 describes displacement ventilation techniques in which ventilation air is brought into a conditioned space at low velocity and without mixing to capture impurities and convey them toward a removal zone near the ceiling. U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,296 describes an exhaust hood that is located near the ceiling with an exhaust intake jutting from the ceiling level. Ventilation air enters the occupied space via a horizontal jet that runs along the ceiling level and a displacement ventilation registers that distributes air at low (non-mixing) velocities.
According to an embodiment, an exhaust device has a housing having an aspect ratio of at least ten. The housing has surfaces defining at least one recess having an exhaust intake. The housing has a perimeter adjacent the at least one recess having a jet register located below the exhaust intake and configured to generate jets, a first of the jets being directed toward the exhaust intake and located below it and a second of the jets being directed substantially vertically downward. The lower edges of a portion of the housing contains the exhaust intake and portions of the housing containing the jet register being substantially vertically aligned. The surfaces defining each of the at least one recess forms a piecewise arcuate continuous surface with a light source located adjacent the jet register. The exhaust intake defines a linear horizontal intake area, at least one portion of which is covered by a removable blank. The jet register has directable nozzles forming the first of the jets that are aimed at the exhaust intake areas not covered by the removable blank. Note that the nozzles can be replaced by discharge vents with movable vanes or sliding damper elements. The first of the jets terminates at or immediately short of the exhaust intake. The second of the jets terminates above approximately 1.8 meters above a floor level. A fume source is located below the housing with an edge of the fume source being positioned to form at least a 20 degree angle from the vertical with the jet register such that all of the fume source lies below the at least one recess. A control system is configured to control at least the volume flow rate of the second of the jets responsively to real time measured draft conditions in a space in which the housing is located. The control system may be configured to control the first of the jets responsively to real time measured draft conditions in a space in which the housing is located. A general ventilation register may be located adjacent the jet register, the general ventilation register directing ventilation air downwardly at non-mixing velocities. The jet register may be configured to surround the housing perimeter. The first and second of the jets may be supplied from a common plenum. The first and second of the jets may be supplied from separate plenums which are supplied by air sources at separately controlled flow rates.
According to another embodiment, an exhaust device has a housing having an aspect ratio of at least ten. The housing may have surfaces defining at least one recess having an exhaust intake. The housing may have a perimeter adjacent the at least one recess having a jet register located below the exhaust intake and configured to generate jets with a first of the jets being directed toward the exhaust intake and located below it and a second of the jets being directed substantially vertically downward. Preferably, lower edges of a portion of the housing contain the exhaust intake and portion of the housing containing the jet register are substantially vertically aligned. Preferably, the surfaces defining each of the at least one recess form a piecewise arcuate continuous surface with a light source located adjacent the jet register. Preferably, the exhaust intake defines a linear horizontal intake area, at least one portion of which is covered by a removable blank. The jet register may have directable nozzles forming the first of the jets that are aimed at the exhaust intake areas not covered by the removable blank. The first of the jets terminates at or immediately short of the exhaust intake. Preferably, the second of the jets terminates above approximately 1.8 meters above a floor level. Preferably, a fume source is located below the housing with an edge of the fume source being positioned to form at least a 20 degree angle from the vertical with the jet register such that all of the fume source lies below the at least one recess. Preferably, a control system is configured to control at least the volume flow rate of the second of the jets responsively to real time measured draft conditions in a space in which the housing is located.
According to an embodiment, an exhaust device has a housing having an aspect ratio of at least ten. The housing has surfaces defining at least one recess having an exhaust intake. The housing has a perimeter adjacent the at least one recess having a jet register located below the exhaust intake and configured to generate jets, a first of the jets being directed toward the exhaust intake and located below it and a second of the jets being directed substantially vertically downward. The lower edges of a portion of the housing contains the exhaust intake and portions of the housing containing the jet register being substantially vertically aligned. The surfaces defining each of the at least one recess forms a piecewise arcuate continuous surface with a light source located adjacent the jet register. The first of the jets terminates at or immediately short of the exhaust intake. The second of the jets terminates above approximately 1.8 meters above a floor level. A fume source is located below the housing with an edge of the fume source being positioned to form at least a 20 degree angle from the vertical with the jet register such that all of the fume source lies below the at least one recess. The control system may be configured to control the first of the jets responsively to real time measured draft conditions in a space in which the housing is located. A general ventilation register may be located adjacent the jet register, the general ventilation register directing ventilation air downwardly at non-mixing velocities. The jet register may be configured to surround the housing perimeter. The first and second of the jets may be supplied from a common plenum. The first and second of the jets may be supplied from separate plenums which are supplied by air sources at separately controlled flow rates.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the features of the invention.
The efficiency of exhaust systems that employ ventilated ceiling systems, where the exhaust intake is located at the ceiling level, is particularly challenging. The capture efficiency of the system must be assured to prevent the spreading of impurities throughout the conditioned space. It has been shown that the efficiency of the exhaust system can be improved with a horizontal jet near the ceiling surface. The air jet is projected horizontally across the ceiling, which helps to direct heat and air impurities towards the exhaust intake. Preferably, such jets have a volume flow rate that is only about 10% of the total supply air flow rate. In the ventilated ceiling, the jet may improve the total effectiveness of the ventilation system. With the horizontal jet, the average contaminant level in the occupied zone was shown to be 40% lower than one without and the estimated energy saving potential can be as high as 23%.
A ventilated ceiling may have features similar to the devices shown in U.S. Pat. No. D407,473, filed Apr. 1, 1999 and shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,296, filed Jan. 30, 1991, both of which are hereby incorporated herein. In an embodiment, the ventilation device of U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,296 is modified by including a vertical curtain jet register between the non-mixing ventilation register 17 and the horizontal jet register 15. The vertical curtain jet register in this embodiment has a velocity, thickness and breadth as to form a continuous curtain jet that terminates at about the height of the head of a worker, or approximately 1.8 m above the floor when located in an interior space. In another embodiment, the device is modified by lifting the intake plenum 18 and dropping the ventilation registers such that a configuration similar to that of
Referring now to
An additional combined vertical and horizontal jet register 138 emits air so as to form substantially vertical and substantially horizontal jets as indicated by arrows 122 and 120, respectively. The vertical and horizontal jets may be supplied via a plenum 136 (supplied through a collar 104) and may encircle, flank on two or three sides, or border on a single side, the LVD 10. The vertical and horizontal jets may be supplied by ventilation air, ambient air, or conditioned room air. Each may also be supplied from different ones of these sources of air. Preferably, the velocity of the horizontal jet 120 is such that it terminates approximately at the point where it would otherwise reach an exhaust intake 114, which preferably has a removable filter 113. Exhausted fumes and air are removed via plenums 106 and exhaust collars 102 which attach to suitable ductwork. Notwithstanding the name, “horizontal,” the angle of the horizontal jet 120 may be aimed toward the center of the exhaust intake 114 or at some intermediate angle between such angle and the horizontal.
Unlike the device of U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,296, in the embodiment of
Preferably, the vertical and horizontal jets 122, 120 originate from approximately the same location (register 138) which coincides with a perimeter of the LVD 10. They do not need to be supplied from the same source of air nor do they need to originate from a common register structure. It is preferable, however that they both are positioned to form a 20° angle from the vertical and whose vertex is at the outermost edge of the pollution-generating part 121 of an appliance 100. Thus, lower appliances must be located more inwardly and higher appliances can be located more outwardly. This minimum angle may be reduced if the exhaust flow is increased or the jet flow rates are increased.
Preferably the horizontal jet has a velocity of 6 to 10 m/s and a volume flow rate per linear meter of 21 to 35 cm/hr per linear meter of the LVD 10 perimeter for a typical kitchen application. These approximately coincide with the throw conditions identified above. Preferably, the total volume rate of the vertical jets to the total volume rate of the horizontal jets is preferably about 0.25 to 0.35. These are not necessarily required values, but are representative for kitchen applications. A preferred aspect ratio of the exhaust device (e.g., W/Y indicated in
Referring to
A controller 302 receives one or more sensor 310 signals and may control one or more outputs including drives 304-308 which control flow rates indicated by fan symbols 312-316. The drives 304-308 may be damper drives or speed drives or any device for controlling volume flow rate. The drive signals may control the exhaust rate, vertical jet flow rate, horizontal jet flow rate, and/or displacement ventilation flow rate. Any of these may be controlled separately or together (e.g., a common drive signal or a mechanical coupling in the control and mechanical aspects) according to various mechanical embodiments (such as one in which a shared plenum provides air for both the vertical and horizontal jets).
In an embodiment, the exhaust flow rate is preferably modulated responsively to the fume load and/or indicators of drafts or air movement in the conditioned space. The velocities of the vertical and/or horizontal jets may be modulated in response to such inputs as well. For example, when there is greater air movement in the conditioned space, such as caused by workers moving about, the exhaust velocity may be proportionately increased and the vertical jet speed may be increased proportionately as well.
While the present invention has been disclosed with reference to certain embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations, and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present invention, as defined in the appended claims. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it has the full scope defined by the language of the following claims, and equivalents thereof.
Although the LVDs shown including lighting components, these are not essential to all embodiments and any of the embodiment may be modified by their removal. The LVD structures may be configured as modular components that can be assembled to form various shapes to cover pollution sources in various arrangements in a production space. Blanks that cover exhaust intakes may be provided as part of a kit and used to redefine the exhaust intake coverage as a production space is modified by the replacement, removal, or rearrangement of pollutions sources. Control adjustments discussed above may be done manually as well as automatically. The LVD embodiments may be surface mounted or recessed into a ceiling or false ceiling. General ventilation registers may be located at all sides of an LVD or only some sides. General ventilation registers may be located adjacent or remotely from the LVD. Note also that although the vertical and horizontal jets in the embodiments described are single point jets forming linear arrays, in alternative embodiments, the jets may be formed as slots to form vertical and horizontal curtains.
In the present and all systems, a ventilated ceiling is distinguished from conventional hoods by being very shallow relative to the height at which it is located. Here in this case, the depth 842 of the recess 860 may be more than five time the distance 840 from the source of fumes and the blind end of the recess 860.
Note that any of the embodiments described herein may be modified by eliminating the lighting component. So wherever the term “LVD” is used, the alternative lacking a light source is also a possible embodiment.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/988,487 filed Nov. 18, 2010, which is a U.S. national stage entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2009/041148 filed Apr. 20, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/046,257 filed Apr. 18, 2008, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2743529 | Hayes et al. | May 1956 | A |
2833615 | Kollgaard | May 1958 | A |
2853367 | Berton et al. | Sep 1958 | A |
2862095 | Scofield | Nov 1958 | A |
2933080 | Adey | Apr 1960 | A |
3332676 | Namy | Jul 1967 | A |
3400649 | Jensen | Sep 1968 | A |
3457850 | Sweet et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3513766 | Ahlrich | May 1970 | A |
3536457 | Henderson | Oct 1970 | A |
3583306 | Hagdorn | Jun 1971 | A |
3829285 | Beck | Aug 1974 | A |
3943836 | Kuechler | Mar 1976 | A |
3952640 | Kuechler | Apr 1976 | A |
3978777 | Nett | Sep 1976 | A |
4043319 | Jensen | Aug 1977 | A |
4047519 | Nett | Sep 1977 | A |
4050368 | Eakes | Sep 1977 | A |
4056877 | Kuechler | Nov 1977 | A |
4085736 | Kuechler | Apr 1978 | A |
4109641 | Hunzicker | Aug 1978 | A |
4113439 | Ookubo et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4117333 | Mueller | Oct 1978 | A |
4127106 | Jensen | Nov 1978 | A |
4134394 | Otenbaker | Jan 1979 | A |
4138220 | Davies et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4143645 | Blumberg | Mar 1979 | A |
4143646 | Sampsel | Mar 1979 | A |
4146017 | Overton | Mar 1979 | A |
4147502 | Milton | Apr 1979 | A |
4153044 | Nett | May 1979 | A |
4211154 | Eakes | Jul 1980 | A |
4213947 | Fremont et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4286572 | Searcy | Sep 1981 | A |
4346692 | McCauley | Aug 1982 | A |
4346962 | Holmes | Aug 1982 | A |
4373507 | Schwartz et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4397226 | Lind | Aug 1983 | A |
4407266 | Molitor | Oct 1983 | A |
4462387 | Welsh | Jul 1984 | A |
4467782 | Russell | Aug 1984 | A |
4475534 | Moriarty | Oct 1984 | A |
4483316 | Fritz et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4484563 | Fritz et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4497242 | Moyer | Feb 1985 | A |
4553992 | Boissinot et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4556046 | Riffel et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4586486 | Kaufman | May 1986 | A |
4617909 | Molitor | Oct 1986 | A |
4655194 | Wooden | Apr 1987 | A |
4700688 | Searcy | Oct 1987 | A |
4706553 | Sharp et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4753218 | Potter | Jun 1988 | A |
4773311 | Sharp | Sep 1988 | A |
4788905 | Kohorn | Dec 1988 | A |
4811724 | Aalto et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4856419 | Imai | Aug 1989 | A |
4872892 | Vartiainen et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4896657 | Glassman | Jan 1990 | A |
4903685 | Melink | Feb 1990 | A |
4903894 | Pellinen et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4944283 | Tsuchiya et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4944285 | Glassman | Jul 1990 | A |
5042456 | Cote | Aug 1991 | A |
5050581 | Roehl-Hager et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5063834 | Aalto et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5215075 | Caridis et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220910 | Aalto et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5251608 | Cote | Oct 1993 | A |
5311930 | Bruenn | May 1994 | A |
5312296 | Aalto | May 1994 | A |
5522377 | Fritz | Jun 1996 | A |
5580535 | Hoke et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5622100 | King et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5657744 | Vianen | Aug 1997 | A |
5716268 | Strongin | Feb 1998 | A |
D407473 | Wimbock | Mar 1999 | S |
5882254 | Jacob | Mar 1999 | A |
6044838 | Deng | Apr 2000 | A |
6058929 | Fritz | May 2000 | A |
6089970 | Feustel | Jul 2000 | A |
6170480 | Melink et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173710 | Gibson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6252689 | Sharp | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6336451 | Röhl-Hager et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347626 | Yi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6428408 | Bell | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450879 | Suen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6752144 | Lee | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6846236 | Gregoricka | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851421 | Livchak et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869468 | Gibson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878195 | Gibson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899095 | Livchak et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6920874 | Siegel | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7048199 | Melink | May 2006 | B2 |
7147168 | Bagwell et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7318771 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7364094 | Bagwell et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
8038515 | Livchak | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8444462 | Livchak et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20030146082 | Gibson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162491 | Kanaya | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040011349 | Livchak | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040035411 | Livchak | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050000509 | Carter | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050115557 | Meredith et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050229922 | Magner et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050279845 | Bagwell et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060032492 | Bagwell | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060060187 | Luddy | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060219235 | Bagwell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070015449 | Livchak | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023349 | Kylionen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070068509 | Bagwell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070084459 | Heinonen | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070184771 | Fluhrer | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202791 | Lee | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070272230 | Meredith et al. | Nov 2007 | A9 |
20080045132 | Livchak et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080207109 | Bagwell et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080302247 | Magner et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080308088 | Livchak et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090093210 | Livchak et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090199844 | Meredith et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1138776 | Sep 1977 | AU |
3400697 | Jan 1998 | AU |
2933601 | Jul 2001 | AU |
838829 | Jun 1976 | BE |
1054430 | May 1979 | CA |
1069749 | Jan 1980 | CA |
1081030 | Jul 1980 | CA |
1177306 | Nov 1984 | CA |
2536332 | Mar 2005 | CA |
682512 | Sep 1993 | CH |
1679545 | Mar 1971 | DE |
267301 | Sep 1976 | DE |
2659736 | Jul 1977 | DE |
3144777 | May 1983 | DE |
3519189 | Dec 1986 | DE |
4120175 | Feb 1992 | DE |
4114329 | Nov 1992 | DE |
4203916 | Apr 1993 | DE |
19613513 | Oct 1997 | DE |
19911850 | Sep 2000 | DE |
10127679 | Jan 2003 | DE |
0401583 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0753706 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0881935 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1250556 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1637810 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1778418 | May 2007 | EP |
58971 | Jan 1981 | FI |
2008451 | Jan 1970 | FR |
2301778 | Sep 1976 | FR |
2635579 | Feb 1990 | FR |
2705766 | Dec 1994 | FR |
1544445 | Apr 1979 | GB |
2132335 | Jul 1984 | GB |
1019417 | Feb 2000 | HK |
S51132645 | Nov 1976 | JP |
60213753 | Oct 1985 | JP |
63091442 | Apr 1988 | JP |
1988063183 | Apr 1988 | JP |
63251741 | Oct 1988 | JP |
10084039 | Mar 1989 | JP |
H02109956 | Sep 1990 | JP |
32047937 | Nov 1991 | JP |
40000140 | Jan 1992 | JP |
40062347 | Feb 1992 | JP |
40068242 | Mar 1992 | JP |
41013143 | Apr 1992 | JP |
52048645 | Sep 1993 | JP |
1974069255 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H06073636 | Oct 1994 | JP |
1995214327 | Aug 1995 | JP |
H07214327 | Aug 1995 | JP |
1996094140 | Apr 1996 | JP |
10288371 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11514734 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000081216 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2001165483 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002089859 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002139234 | May 2002 | JP |
2003519771 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003269770 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004028493 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2005214584 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2006329496 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2008070049 | Mar 2008 | JP |
20060007715 | Jan 2006 | KR |
7601862 | Feb 1976 | NL |
7602168 | Aug 1976 | SE |
7904443 | Nov 1980 | SE |
1986006154 | Oct 1986 | WO |
1997048479 | Dec 1997 | WO |
2001051857 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2001084054 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2002014728 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2002014746 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2003056252 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2005019736 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005114059 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006002190 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006012628 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006074420 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006074425 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007121461 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008157418 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009092077 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009129539 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Communication of Letter from Opponent, dated Apr. 4, 2012, in European Patent Application No. 20050775069 with English translation. |
Communication of Notice of Opposition dated May 4, 2011 in European Patent Application No. 20050775069 with English translation of Statement of Grounds. |
Examination Report dated Aug. 6, 2013, in counterpart Australian Patent Application No. 2009237572. |
Examination Report dated Feb. 24, 2016, in counterpart Australian Patent Application No. 2014271273. |
Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion dated Sep. 4, 2014, in European Pat. Appln No. 14169406.7. |
Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion dated Mar. 11, 2011, in European Patent Application No. 09 73 2140. |
Faltsi-Saravelou et al., “Detailed Modeling of a Swirling Coal Flame,” Combustion Science and Technology, 1997, 123:pp. 1-22. |
Halton drawings, “Model KVL Fryer Hood”, Nov. 18, 1998. |
Halton drawings, “Model KVL Kitchen Hood Layout”, Sep. 21, 1998. |
Interlocutory Decision in Opposition Proceedings, dated Feb. 18, 2013, in European Patent No. 1,778,418. |
Letter from Opponent, dated Dec. 20, 2012, in European Patent No. 1 778 418 with English translation. |
Minutes of the Oral Proceedings of the Opposition Division, dated Feb. 18, 2013, in European Patent No. 1,778,418. |
Morsi et al., “An Investigation of Particle Trajectories in Two-Phase Flow Systems,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1972, 55:pp. 193-208. |
Non-final Office Action, dated May 23, 2010, for U.S. Appl, No. 12/407,686. |
Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2014, in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/A/2010/011363. |
Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2014, in counterpart European Patent Application No. 09732140.0. |
Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2013, in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2010/011363. |
Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2013, in counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-505255. |
Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2013, in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/763,167. |
Office Action in Japanese Patent Application No. JP2014-036914 dated Mar. 3, 2015 with English translation. |
Office Action in Korean Patent Application No. 2010-7025369 dated Mar. 18, 2015 with English translation. |
Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2012, in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980118055.X. |
Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2016 in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,721,763. |
Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2013, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-505255. |
Office Action issued in European Patent Application No. 14169406.7 dated Aug. 23, 2016. |
Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2015, in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,721,763. |
Office Communication dated Mar. 20, 2013, in European Patent Application No. 09732140. |
Official Action dated Sep. 12, 2013, in counterpart Mexican Patent Application No. MX/A/2010/011363. |
Prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 07/010,277, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,811,724. |
Summary for GIDASPOW, D., Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions, Academic Press, 1994. |
Summary for Lumley et al., A First Course of Turbulence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1972. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings including Annex to Invitation, dated Aug. 2, 2012, for Opposition in European Patent Application No. 2005775069. |
Translation of foreign patent document DE 4203919. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/US05/26378. |
Examination Report issued for Indian Patent Application No. 7961/DELNP/2010 dated Mar. 1, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170144201 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61046257 | Apr 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12988487 | US | |
Child | 15424806 | US |