The present invention relates generally to exhaust nozzles, and more particularly to nozzles for use with exhaust systems that evacuate fumes or otherwise draw undesirable air from within a building or enclosure.
There are many different types of exhaust systems for buildings and enclosed spaces. In areas such as laboratories and kitchens, fumes are often produced that have an unpleasant odor or are otherwise undesirable. It is common to outfit such environments with exhaust systems that draw the fumes from the building and dispel them through an exhaust port that is typically located on an external wall or roof of the building.
Furthermore, it is often desirable to expel the air a distance from the exterior of the building to avoid introducing it into the environment surrounding the building. Many conventional exhaust systems employ tall exhaust towers or stacks so that the air exits the building well above ground level. However, these exhaust stacks are expensive to construct and maintain and are generally considered unsightly.
Exhaust systems have been developed that use high velocity fans to force the air away from the building and surrounding area without the need for towers or stacks. Also, systems have been developed that combine the forced air exhaust systems with systems that mix the undesirable air with fresh air to dilute the concentration of the undesirable air before it is exhausted from the building at a high velocity. Such exhaust systems are commercially available from Greenheck Fan Corporation of Wisconsin under the Vektor model name. By diluting the undesirable air before release into the surrounding environment, these systems reduce the amount of separation desired between the release point and the surrounding environment. The air is thus forced to a desirable distance from the building and surrounding environment by fan power without the need for unsightly towers or stacks and the associated costs.
While these “stack-less” exhaust systems are desirable, they typically have associated maintenance costs and may not be suitable for a given application without significant adaptation for the particular performance specifications of the given application. For example, in some circumstances, a particular fan arrangement, that is, motor size, blade configuration, and/or nozzle configuration, may not achieve and sustain flow characteristics to achieve the plume height and flow volume necessary to exhaust the air a sufficient distance from the building and surrounding environment.
Drive motor sizing and fan blade size, quantity, and configuration affect the performance and efficiency of the exhaust system. The configuration of the outlet nozzle is also very important, as is the configuration of the windband that is placed about the nozzle to help entrain ambient air with the exhaust air exiting the nozzle. While many conventional windbands are open-ended annular structures that vary primarily by entry and exit diameter, the size and shape of the outlet nozzle can vary significantly and thus is one of the most important elements to consider when designing the exhaust system.
One example of an existing exhaust nozzle is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,676,503. This patent discloses one exhaust nozzle configuration having an outlet defined by curved, convoluted outer walls that taper inwardly from an inlet side of the nozzle toward the outlet. The patent discloses outlets taking generally rounded X-, Y-, and I-shaped configurations, all of which are defined by inwardly tapering outer walls. A drawback with the disclosed nozzle is that the air exiting the nozzle moves in a generally inward direction toward the vertical centerline of the windband above the nozzle due to the inward taper of the nozzle walls. This does not optimally entrain ambient air with the building exhaust air, possibly because the periphery of the exiting air is not sufficiently turbulent or because the area of the flow path is not large enough. In any event, the result is less dilution of the undesirable air and a lower plume height due to lesser air mass passing through the windband.
As such, it would be desirable for an exhaust system to have an improved nozzle configuration that betters air expulsion.
The present invention overcomes the aforementioned drawbacks by providing a building exhaust system nozzle that improves entrainment of ambient air with the building exhaust air. The improved air entrainment results in increased exhaust air dilution and plume height to better disperse the exhaust air away from the building surroundings.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, an exhaust assembly nozzle is disclosed that includes a pair of outer lateral walls and a pair of outer transverse walls extending from an inlet and forming an airflow path from the inlet to an outlet. The exhaust assembly nozzle also includes a pair of sloped inner lateral walls that angle outwards from at or near the inlet towards corresponding outer lateral walls to form a pair of laterally extending outlets at the outlet. The sloped inner lateral walls direct air exiting the outlets in a laterally outward direction.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, an exhaust nozzle for a ventilation system is disclosed that includes a base frame member arranged at an inlet, a pair of outer lateral walls extending from opposing sides of the base frame member, and a pair of outer transverse walls extending from opposing sides of the base frame member and disposed between the pair of opposing outer lateral walls. The exhaust nozzle also includes a first set of inner lateral walls and a second set of inner lateral walls extending from a vertex at the inlet toward the pair of outer lateral walls and, with the pair of outer lateral walls and the pair of outer transverse walls, forming a pair of laterally extending outlets at an outlet of the nozzle. The exhaust nozzle further includes a pair of spaced transverse walls separating the first set of inner lateral walls and the second set of inner lateral walls to form a transverse outlet at the outlet of the nozzle that joins the pair of laterally extending outlets.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention, a ventilation system nozzle is disclosed that includes a pair of outer lateral walls and a pair of outer transverse walls arranged between the pair of outer lateral walls to form a generally rectangular nozzle inlet. The ventilation system nozzle also includes a first pair of inner lateral walls and a second pair of inner lateral walls sloped from a respective common axis toward the outer lateral walls to form a pair of laterally extending outlets. The ventilation system further includes a pair of spaced transverse walls disposed between the first pair of inner lateral walls and the second pair of inner lateral walls to form a transverse outlet joining the pair of laterally extending outlets to form a generally H-shaped nozzle outlet.
An exhaust system with the nozzle of the present invention can effect improved entrainment of ambient air with building exhaust air by increasing mixing of the two air masses. This increases the dilution of the building exhaust air leaving the exhaust system. It also increases the flow volume such that the height of the plume expelled from the exhaust system is increased. Better dispersion of the exhaust air is thus achieved. Empirical study of a particular nozzle configuration according to the present invention confirms that air entrainment increased at least 10-20% over conventional nozzle configurations, for example, annular converging nozzles.
Various other features and advantages of the present invention will be made apparent from the following detailed description and the drawings.
Reference is hereby made to the following drawings in which like reference numerals correspond to like elements throughout, and in which:
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring again to
The control of the exhaust assembly 34 typically includes both mechanical and electronic control elements. A conventional damper 46 may be disposed in the conduit 26 at a location slightly above each hood 22. The damper 46 may be manually or automatically actuated between a fully open orientation (as illustrated) and a fully closed orientation to control the amount of air evacuated from the chamber 24.
Referring now to
When nozzle 44 is mounted at an output of a building ventilation system, such as described with respect to
As best shown in
As shown in
For example, while in the illustrated embodiment the vertex 64 is shown aligned along a central lateral axis, denoted B, it is contemplated that the vertex 64 may be shifted transversely from the lateral axis B. In this regard, variations in the angles 66 between the inner lateral walls 54 may be achieved. Additionally or alternatively, the vertical displacement of the vertex 64 with respect to the base 48 may be varied on either side of the spaced transverse walls 58 to thereby vary the angles 66 between the inner lateral walls 54.
Regardless of proportional variations, as shown in
In operation, the nozzle 44 receives airflow through the inlet 49 and directs the airflow to the restricted airflow outlet 62 to thereby expel the airflow away from the nozzle 44 at a high velocity. Specifically, air entering the nozzle 44 is initially confined by just the outer lateral walls 50 and the outer transverse walls 52 and, as it traverses up through the nozzle 44, the air meets and is directed by the inner lateral walls 54 from the vertex 64 to the laterally extending outlets 56. In this regard, the inner lateral walls 54 perform two operations. First, by creating the vertex 64, the arrangement efficiently cuts and separates the air flowing through the nozzle 44. Second, once separated, the airflow is accelerated away from vertical axis A and the central lateral axis B and directed towards the outer lateral periphery of the nozzle 44. This increases mixing of the exhaust air with the outside air through the space at the nozzle/windband interface. Accordingly, entrainment of air through the windband 42 above the nozzle 44 when installed in the exhaust fan assembly is increased. Therefore, the vertex 64 efficiently cuts and separates the airflow so that the angled inner lateral walls 54 can then force the airflow toward the outer lateral walls 50 and thereby accelerate the airflow toward and through the restricted airflow outlet 62.
Ambient air entrainment increases of 10-20% over conventional converging annular nozzles have been achieved empirically. This increased air entrainment provides for increased dilution of the building exhaust air before it is expelled from the exhaust system. It also increases the air flow mass exiting the exhaust system such that greater plume heights can be realized. Both of these features provide for better dispersion of the unwanted building exhaust air from the building surroundings.
Therefore, the above-described invention provides a cost-effective exhaust system nozzle that improves expulsion processes by accelerating air expelled from the nozzle while increasing entrainment of air from the windband. As a result, expulsion of undesirable air removed by an exhaust system is improved using a generally low cost, low maintenance H-shaped nozzle configuration.
The present invention has been described in terms of the preferred embodiment, and it should be appreciated that many equivalents, alternatives, variations, and modifications, aside from those expressly stated, are possible and within the scope of the invention. Therefore, the invention should not be limited to a particular described embodiment. To ascertain the full scope of the invention, the following claims should be referenced.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/588,074 filed on Jul. 15, 2004, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/625,220 filed Nov. 5, 2004, the disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
37270 | Betts | Jan 1863 | A |
297972 | Day | May 1884 | A |
352597 | Wohlfert | Nov 1886 | A |
603881 | Kuphal | May 1898 | A |
648801 | Schubert | May 1900 | A |
736748 | Le Beau | Aug 1903 | A |
852480 | Whitehead | May 1907 | A |
1053507 | De Kernia | Feb 1913 | A |
1126348 | Basman | Jan 1915 | A |
1296040 | Bontya | Mar 1919 | A |
1346633 | Cloud | Jul 1920 | A |
1394735 | Jordan | Oct 1921 | A |
1729152 | Kiesel, Jr. | Aug 1929 | A |
1891860 | Woolf | Dec 1932 | A |
1986176 | Zwerling | Jan 1935 | A |
2188564 | Berg | Jan 1940 | A |
2265112 | Davies | Dec 1941 | A |
2269050 | Zimmerman | Jan 1942 | A |
2363733 | Karol | Nov 1944 | A |
2478761 | Houseman | Aug 1949 | A |
2514247 | Leardi et al. | Jul 1950 | A |
2605693 | Hansen | Aug 1952 | A |
2714847 | Svebel | Aug 1955 | A |
2973825 | Bertin | Mar 1961 | A |
3045579 | Jenn et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3069071 | Carlson | Dec 1962 | A |
3087409 | Carr | Apr 1963 | A |
3115820 | Adelt | Dec 1963 | A |
3209670 | Twickler | Oct 1965 | A |
3283694 | Dean, Jr. | Nov 1966 | A |
3285567 | Richardson | Nov 1966 | A |
3288377 | Van de Roer | Nov 1966 | A |
3347147 | Howard | Oct 1967 | A |
3385197 | Greber | May 1968 | A |
3537411 | Roy | Nov 1970 | A |
3719032 | Cash | Mar 1973 | A |
3727566 | Roy | Apr 1973 | A |
3730073 | Potter | May 1973 | A |
3797373 | Larson | Mar 1974 | A |
3817162 | Guelph | Jun 1974 | A |
4095514 | Roy et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4184417 | Chancellor | Jan 1980 | A |
4204463 | Carty | May 1980 | A |
4344370 | Smith et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4525223 | Tsuya et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4655121 | Ludwig | Apr 1987 | A |
4682206 | Tsuya et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4806076 | Andrews | Feb 1989 | A |
4915141 | Nitta et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4993314 | Braden et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5326317 | Ishizu et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5439349 | Kupferberg | Aug 1995 | A |
6053162 | Godfree et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6112850 | Secrest et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6431974 | Tetley et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6676503 | Hill et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7018287 | Kupferberg et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20030114098 | Hill et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040146821 | Joshi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1173612 | Dec 1959 | FR |
507787 | Jun 1939 | GB |
610153 | Oct 1948 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060014484 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60588074 | Jul 2004 | US | |
60625220 | Nov 2004 | US |