The invention relates to exhaust fans for exhausting “dirty” or “lab” air (more generically, “inlet” air) and, more particularly, to exhaust fans which mix the inlet air flow with an induced air flow (sometimes otherwise referred to as “dilution” or “rooftop” air).
As a matter of background, exhaust emissions have long been provided with exhaust stacks in order to ensure that the “effective” stack height of the emissions is at least the physical stack height. However, “effective” stack height is more accurately the sum of the physical stack height plus the gains gotten from other effects such as efflux velocity and flowrate, or in other cases buoyancy, and so on. Looked at another way, “effective” stack height is the point where (ignoring buoyancy) the contributions end from such other effects as efflux velocity and flowrate. At that point, the emissions are at the mercy of the dispersions of the localized ambient.
It is an object of the invention to provide exhaust fan systems which minimize physical stack height but through other design factors maximize effective stack height.
It is an alternative object of the invention to achieve the foregoing in combination with mixing an induced or dilution air flow with the given inlet (eg., “dirty” or “lab”) air flow such that the efflux comprises a mixed flow.
It is an additional object of the invention to provide the foregoing with dual driven-impeller packages such that they operate as counterparts to each other. That is, one impeller is optimized for suctioning out the inlet flow from a converging network of ducts having origins in remote diverse intake ports. In contrast, the other impeller is optimized for expelling the mixed exhaust in a tall, columnar plume.
These and other aspects and objects of the invention are provided by an exhaust apparatus for diluting a forced, primary flow of gases with a secondary flow and expelling the consequential diluted flow. One embodiment of such an apparatus comprises the following. That is, it has a passageway for delivering the forced, primary flow. The passageway terminates in an outlet port therefor.
There is also a center body that axially extends from the outlet port to a spaced terminal end. The center body is radially contoured in the axial direction from the outlet port toward the terminal end to include a flaring portion, a convex transition portion, and then a tapering portion. The center body is positioned with respect to the outlet port to accept the delivery of the primary flow to outflow therefrom and be flared out by traversing along the flaring portion.
There is furthermore a windband or, in alternative terminology, a collar. Such a collar axially extends between an input end and a spaced output end. The collar is radially sized to surround the center body and define an annular flow passage therewith. The collar furthermore includes an intermediate hoop section that is sized and disposed to define an annular throat in combination with the center body's convex transition portion.
Given the foregoing, the collar being disposed such that the input end is aimed to channel the outflow of the primary flow from the outlet port toward said throat. Additionally, the collar's input end is spaced away from the passageway's outlet port to allow the introduction of the secondary flow to the primary flow such that the consequential diluted flow flows through said throat and is expelled out the output end.
The invention might more particularly be situated in an environment whereby the passageway comprises an exhaust stack. Such an exhaust stack extends into ambient air and therefore the collar might be reckoned as shaped in a funnel form. That is, from a reference of the hoop section, the funnel form generally flares out toward the input end as well as tapers in toward the output end. In this context, the secondary flow generally comprises drawn in ambient air.
The invention might further be conceived of as including a driven fan downstream from the outlet port for forcing the primary flow. In this context, the primary flow can be reckoned as exhaust gases which are pre-selected to be diluted by ambient air.
In the context of the passageway comprising an exhaust stack, the center body might optionally include a circumferential seam below the convex transition portion for draining adhering rainwater into an interior well. Moreover, the collar might be advantageously shaped to taper toward the output end in spaced correspondence with the center body's tapering portion in order to define an annular nozzle passage sized to forcibly expel the diluted flow.
An alternate embodiment of such an exhaust apparatus operates to combine a forced, first flow of gases with a second flow, thereafter forcibly expel the consequential combined flow. Such an apparatus includes an inventive impeller wheel for forcing the second flow in a direction from a suction side to a pressure side.
Such an impeller wheel includes a hub for rotation about a spin axis, a coaxial rim annularly spaced from the hub and axially extending between a pressure-side edge and a suction-side edge, apertured webbing radially spacing and interconnecting the hub and rim, and angularly spaced blades extending radially out from the rim to tip edges.
A like passageway as described previously is provided for delivering the forced, first flow. Such a passageway terminates in an outlet port, which is disposed to match up closely with the rim's suction-side edge for channeling the forced, first flow to pass through the apertured webbing from the suction side to the pressure side.
Given the foregoing, the blades of the spinning impeller wheel axially force the second flow to annularly wrap around a core of the forced, first flow and thereby afford the flows to combine into the combined flow on the pressure side of the impeller wheel.
This alternate embodiment of an exhaust stack apparatus might optionally include a windband as well, or in alternate terminology, a shroud. Such a shroud would preferably have a circumferential sidewall axially extending between an input end and a spaced output end. It would also preferably have a hoop section that is axially-spaced from the output end. More preferred still is if this particular hoop section is radially-sized and positioned to closely surround a periphery of the tip edges of impeller wheel blades. Overall, the shroud should be positioned such that the input end channels a supply of the second flow toward the impeller blades from the suction side. In consequence, the output end will expel the consequential combined flow.
This alternate embodiment of an exhaust stack apparatus might further be designed as a package including a driven fan downstream from the impeller wheel for forcing the first flow. That way, if the drive for the impeller wheel is adjustable for expelling the diluted flow in substantial flow, the driven fan might be independently adjustable for the loads it is designed to carry in suctioning out exhaust gases from a building or the like.
It is an aspect of the invention that the aforementioned apertured webbing might be realized in any of a variety of designs, including without limitation being designed as angularly-distributed spokes.
A number of additional features and objects will be apparent in connection with the following discussion of preferred embodiments and examples.
There are shown in the drawings certain exemplary embodiments of the invention as presently preferred. It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed as examples, and is capable of variation within the scope of the appended claims. In the drawings,
a is a side elevational view of the windband, center bulb and one version of the lower outer housing of
b is a sectional view taken along line IIB-IIB in
a is a side elevational view of the windband, center bulb and an alternate version of the lower outer housing of
b is a sectional view taken along line IIIB-IIIB in
There is a center (inner) tapered housing 18 surrounded by a companion outer housing 19(2) or 19(3). The outer housing 19(2) or 19(3) terminates in an upper end which defines a (lower) exhaust port 20 for the inlet flow.
With either version of the outer housing 19(2) or 19(3), the air inlet flow is discharged through the exhaust port 20 into a windband 22. Again, the upper termination of the outer housing 19(2) or 19(3) defines the elevation of the (lower) exhaust port 20.
In contrast, the center (inner) housing 18 extends above the elevation of the (lower) exhaust port 20. From this elevation and above, the center (inner) housing 18 is more particularly referenced as a center bulb 26. The center bulb 26 very approximately resembles a toadstool cap. The windband 22 has an open lower skirt portion 24 for dragging in a dilution (or “rooftop”) air flow. The windband 22 extends upwardly and surrounding the center bulb 26. The windband 22 and center bulb 26 are cooperatively shaped and arranged to form an upper venturi throat 28, which is designed to expel the mix of inlet and dilution air in a tall, columnar plume.
The center (inner) housing 18 has an intermediate partition 27. This intermediate partition 27 functions in part as a rainwater gutter. Rainwater landing on top of the center bulb 26 is blocked from dripping directly down onto the inlet-air blower 14. Instead, the rainwater dribbles down the sidewall of the center bulb 26 as well as continuing down where the center bulb transitions into the center (inner) housing 18 due to the property of surface adhesion or the like. Whenever the dribbling rainwater reaches the level of the intermediate partition 27, the dribbling rainwater continues to follow the contour until it drips off into a well (the well is not illustrated) for the drip-off that is provided inside the center (inner) housing 18. The well is sized to catch the rainfall during rainy periods. The well has a drainpipe (now shown) for draining the caught rainfall out onto the rooftop.
The center bulb 26 extends axially from the exhaust port 20 to the center bulb 26's terminal cap with a contour as follows. That is, the center bulb 26 has a flaring portion 26f that changes into a convex transition portion 26x that then changes into a tapering portion 26y. The lower exhaust port (eg., 20, but not shown in
Briefly, the venturi effect describes the case of a flow flowing through a constriction (ie., the throat 28). The flow speeds up in the restriction, producing a reduction in pressure and a partial vacuum. One way to visualize the venturi effect is to squeeze a (very) flexible garden hose carrying water. If the flow is strong enough, the constriction will remain in the hose even if the hose would normally spring back to its normal shape:—the partial vacuum produced in the constriction is sufficient to keep the hose collapsed. The Coanda effect, on the other hand, is the tendency of a flow to stay attached to a convex surface rather than follow a straight line in its original direction.
The combination of the venturi effect and Coanda effect can be visualized as follows. The back of a spoon can be held close to (but not touching) a stream of water running freely out of a tap (faucet), and it will be discovered that the stream of water will deflect from vertical, attach to the spoon and thereafter run over the back of the spoon. In this example, the venturi effect explains that a drop in pressure between the spoon and the stream causes the stream to deflect towards the spoon. The Coanda effect explains that, once the stream hits the back of the spoon, the stream keeps running over the convex surface of the back of the spoon.
Hence in
This exhaust stack system 30 also has an upper outer housing 62 and upper inner housing 64 for encasing the drive shaft 44 and optional bearing further provide an annular passage 66 for conducting the inlet air flow upwards. The upper outer housing 62 supports a series of brackets 68 on its outside wall for supporting the windband 70 as shown. This windband 70 likewise has an open lower skirt portion 72 for dragging in a dilution (or “rooftop”) air flow. This windband 70 extends upwardly to form a discharge nozzle for producing a tall, columnar plume. This windband 70, at about its “waist” closely surrounds the inventive impeller 50.
Given the foregoing, the following inventive objects are achieved. The inlet-air blower 14 can be designed to optimize its function for suctioning out the inlet flow from a converging network of ducts (not shown) having origins in remote diverse intake ports (not shown). Generally, the air-inlet blower 14 is optimized by a package which works best at high pressure duty, but not necessarily high volume duty. Indeed, most conventional air-inlet blowers are either centrifugal flow or mixed flow designs (and
In contrast, the induced (or “dilution” or else alternatively “rooftop”) air impeller 50 is optimized for opposite conditions, or that is, to produce high volume flow in a low pressure environment. In consequence, it is an aspect of the invention to equip an axial flow design for the impeller 50 in service here.
Several advantages are achieved by the foregoing. The inlet-air blower 14 may be separately controlled from the induced-air impeller 50 such that the inlet-air blower 14 might have a horsepower rating of 20 h.p. (ie., horsepower), but variably controlled as circumstances dictate to run at a fraction of its rating but at whatever power level is required to service the demand at hand. When demand is low, the inlet-air blower 14 can run at low power. When demand is highest, the inlet-air blower 14 might be throttled to full power. Regardless, the induced-air impeller 50 will certainly be powered by a much smaller motor, say, for instance, anywhere from down as low to a ½ h.p. to a 3 h.p. motor. That way, a tall, columnar plume can be produced largely by the effects produced by the induced-air impeller 50, and largely independent of the inlet-air blower 14. Thus, a tall, columnar plume can be produced with running the induced-air blower 50 at 3 h.p. while holding the air-inlet blower 14, in low demand times, down to a 2 h.p. load. When the inlet-air blower 14 is powered to its full 20 h.p. rating and the induced-air impeller 50 is powered down to as low as ½ h.p., the relative power ratio of the inlet-air blower 14 to the induced-air impeller 50 is 20 h.p. to ½ h.p. or, alternatively, 40:1. Conversely, when the inlet-air blower 14 is adjusted down to its low rating of say 2 h.p. or so, and the induced-air impeller 50 is powered up to as high 3 h.p., then the relative power ratio of the inlet-air blower 14 to the induced-air impeller 50 is 2 h.p. to 3 h.p. or, alternatively, 2:3.
Otherwise, if the only driver of the efflux is a lone air-inlet blower 14 of a centrifugal or mixed flow design, it might have to be run at 20 h.p. not because of the demand for suctioning out the inlet air from the converging duct network but because of the need to develop enough efflux velocity and flowrate through the exit nozzle.
This exhaust stack system 130 also has an upper outer housing 162 and upper inner housing 164 for encasing the drive shaft 144 and optional bearing further provide an annular passage 166 for conducting the inlet air flow upwards. The upper outer housing 162 supports a series of brackets 168 on its outside wall for supporting the windband 170 as shown. This windband 170 likewise has an open lower skirt portion 172 for dragging in a dilution (or “rooftop”) air flow. This windband 170 extends upwardly to form a discharge nozzle for producing a tall, columnar plume. This windband 170, at about its “waist” closely surrounds the inventive impeller 150. A set of straightening vanes 174 are attached to the sidewall of the windband 170 as shown.
Given the foregoing, the following inventive objects are achieved. The inlet-air blower 14 can be designed to optimize its function for suctioning out the inlet flow from a converging network of ducts (not shown) having origins in remote diverse intake ports (not shown). Generally, the air-inlet blower 14 is optimized by a package which works best at high pressure duty, but not necessarily high volume duty. Indeed, most conventional air-inlet blowers are either centrifugal flow or mixed flow designs (and
In contrast, the induced (or “dilution” or else alternatively “rooftop”) air impellers 50 and/or 150 are optimized for opposite conditions, or that is, to produce high volume flow in a low pressure environment. In consequence, it is an aspect of the invention to equip an axial flow design for the impeller 50 of FIGS. 6 and 8-11 or else mixed flow design for the impeller 150 of
Several advantages are achieved by the foregoing. The inlet-air blower 14 may be separately controlled from the induced-air impeller 150 such that the inlet-air blower 14 might have a horsepower rating of 20 h.p. (ie., horsepower), but variably controlled as circumstances dictate to run at a fraction of its rating but at whatever power level is required to service the demand at hand. When demand is low, the inlet-air blower 14 can run at low power. When demand is highest, the inlet-air blower 14 might be throttled to full power. Regardless, the induced-air impeller 150 will certainly be powered by a much smaller motor, say, for instance, anywhere from down as low to a ½ h.p. to a 3 h.p. motor. That way, a tall, columnar plume can be produced largely by the effects produced by the induced-air impeller 150, and largely independent of the inlet-air blower 14. Thus, a tall, columnar plume can be produced with running the induced-air blower 150 at 3 h.p. while holding the air-inlet blower 14, in low demand times, down to a 2 h.p. load. When the inlet-air blower 14 is powered to its full 20 h.p. rating and the induced-air impeller 150 is powered down to as low as ½ h.p., the relative power ratio of the inlet-air blower 14 to the induced-air impeller 150 is 20 h.p. to ½ h.p. or, alternatively, 40:1. Conversely, when the inlet-air blower 14 is adjusted down to its low rating of say 2 h.p. or so, and the induced-air impeller 150 is powered up to as high 3 h.p., then the relative power ratio of the inlet-air blower 14 to the induced-air impeller 150 is 2 h.p. to 3 h.p. or, alternatively, 2:3.
Otherwise, if the only driver of the efflux is a lone air-inlet blower 14 of a centrifugal or mixed flow design, it might have to be run at 20 h.p. not because of the demand for suctioning out the inlet air from the converging duct network but because of the need to develop enough efflux velocity and flowrate through the exit nozzle.
The invention having been disclosed in connection with the foregoing variations and examples, additional variations will now be apparent to persons skilled in the art. The invention is not intended to be limited to the variations specifically mentioned, and accordingly reference should be made to the appended claims rather than the foregoing discussion of preferred examples, to assess the scope of the invention in which exclusive rights are claimed.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/178,795, filed Jul. 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,484,929, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/586,760, filed Jul. 9, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
406708 | Daniels | Jul 1889 | A |
1169476 | Grammlich | Jan 1916 | A |
1341882 | Criqui | Jun 1920 | A |
1781165 | Criqui | Nov 1930 | A |
2054144 | Swigert | Sep 1936 | A |
2091677 | Fredericks | Aug 1937 | A |
2188741 | Roberts | Jan 1940 | A |
2285266 | Fullemann | Jun 1942 | A |
2322302 | Martinson | Mar 1943 | A |
2360440 | Muller et al. | Oct 1944 | A |
2571513 | Ammerman | Oct 1951 | A |
2774293 | Jenn | Dec 1956 | A |
3045579 | Jenn et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3143283 | Downs | Aug 1964 | A |
3248081 | Bobo et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3282053 | Messerschmitt | Nov 1966 | A |
3433145 | Daly et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3561883 | Berry | Feb 1971 | A |
3584968 | Keith | Jun 1971 | A |
3811791 | Cotton | May 1974 | A |
3873269 | Sweet et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
4010608 | Simmons | Mar 1977 | A |
4086043 | Howe | Apr 1978 | A |
4363642 | Stahl | Dec 1982 | A |
4806076 | Andrews | Feb 1989 | A |
4846261 | Kittila | Jul 1989 | A |
5203164 | Paulson | Apr 1993 | A |
5439349 | Kupferberg | Aug 1995 | A |
5809993 | Neitzel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6050258 | Neitzel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
7048499 | Mathson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20030012653 | Diemunsch | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030044283 | Nadeau et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
521551 | Mar 1955 | IT |
Entry |
---|
Tubular Centrifugal Fans. Greenheck Co., May 1996 (9 sheets). |
“Facilities Manager” magazine. May/Jun. issue. vol. 17, No. 3 (6 sheets). |
Product description of Vent-Axia® Mixed Flow Roof Fan (RMH). from product catalog of Vent-Axia® LLC. London. UK, pp. 318-325. |
Product description of Vent-Axia® Mixed Flow Roof Fan (RMH). from web site of Vent-Axia® LLC, London, UK, www.vent-axia.com/awwebstore/products/industrial/rmh.asp. |
Product description of Vent-Axia® Mixed Flow Roof Fan (RMV), from product catalog of Vent-Axia® LLC, London, UK, pp. 364-371. |
Product description of Vent-Axia® Mixed Flow Roof Fan (RMV), from web site of Vent-Axia® LLC. London, UK, www.vent-axia.com/awwebstore/products/industrial/rmv.asp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60586760 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11178795 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 12322438 | US |