The present disclosure relates generally to an exhaust flow distribution device. More particularly, the disclosure relates to a device capable of altering the exhaust gas velocity profile upstream of an exhaust aftertreatment device.
The natural velocity profile of exhaust gas in a muffler flowing towards the inlet of an exhaust aftertreatment device (e.g., a catalytic converter or diesel particulate filter) resembles a parabolic curve with the velocity maximum at the center of the flow distribution and decreasing significantly outwardly towards the periphery of the flow distribution. This non-uniform velocity flow distribution shortens the useful lives of the aftertreatment devices, and reduces their operational efficiency.
Various flow distribution devices have been used to create a more uniform velocity flow profile. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,355,973; 5,732,555; 5,185,998; and 4,797,263 disclose exemplary flow distribution devices that can be used to prolong the useful life and efficiency of exhaust aftertreatment devices. However, these flow distribution devices typically either impede fluid flow causing an undesirable increase in backpressure or do not adequately distribute flow across the face of their corresponding exhaust aftertreatment device. Consequently, there is a need for improved flow distribution devices that provide an effective flow distribution while at the same time generating reduced backpressure.
One aspect of the present disclosure is to provide a flow distribution device that is constructed such that it effectively distributes flow without generating unacceptable levels of backpressure. In particular, the flow distribution device includes a plate adapted to be disposed across the flow path of exhaust gas in an exhaust system. The flow distribution device includes a plurality of apertures that define open spaces in the plate. The open spaces are largest adjacent the periphery region of the flow path where the natural flow velocity is slowest and are smallest adjacent the center region of the flow path where the natural flow velocity is fastest.
The flow distribution element 40 is preferably configured to improve exhaust flow uniformity across the upstream end 1 of the aftertreatment device 30 without generating significant back pressure in the exhaust system 10. The aftertreatment device 30 can include a structure such as a catalytic converter, diesel particulate filter, a lean NOx catalyst device, a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst device, a lean NOx trap, or other device for removing for removing pollutants from the exhaust stream.
Catalytic converters are commonly used to convert carbon monoxides and hydrocarbons in the exhaust stream into carbon dioxide and water. Diesel particulate filters are used to remove particulate matter (e.g., carbon based particulate matter such as soot) from an exhaust stream. Lean NOx catalysts are catalysts capable of converting NOx to nitrogen and oxygen in an oxygen rich environment with the assistance of low levels of hydrocarbons. For diesel engines, hydrocarbon emissions are too low to provide adequate NOx conversion, thus hydrocarbons are required to be injected into the exhaust stream upstream of the lean NOx catalysts. SCR's are also capable of converting NOx to nitrogen and oxygen. However, in contrast to using HC's for conversion, SCR's use reductants such as urea or ammonia that are injected into the exhaust stream upstream of the SCR's. NOx traps use a material such as barium oxide to absorb NOx during lean burn operating conditions. During fuel rich operations, the NOx is desorbed and converted to nitrogen and oxygen by catalysts (e.g., precious metals) within the traps.
Diesel particulate filters can have a variety of known configurations. An exemplary configuration includes a monolith ceramic substrate having a “honey-comb” configuration of plugged passages as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,851,015 that is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Wire mesh configurations can also be used. In certain embodiments, the substrate can include a catalyst. Exemplary catalysts include precious metals such as platinum, palladium and rhodium, and other types of components such as base metals or zeolites.
For certain embodiments, diesel particulate filters can have a particulate mass reduction efficiency greater than 75%. In other embodiments, diesel particulate filters can have a particulate mass reduction efficiency greater than 85%. In still other embodiments, diesel particulate filters can have a particulate mass reduction efficiency equal to or greater than 90%. For purposes of this specification, the particulate mass reduction efficiency is determined by subtracting the particulate mass that enters the filter from the particulate mass that exits the filter, and by dividing the difference by the particulate mass that enters the filter.
Catalytic converters can also have a variety of known configurations. Exemplary configurations include substrates defining channels that extend completely therethrough. Exemplary catalytic converter configurations having both corrugated metal and porous ceramic substrates/cores are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,355,973, that is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The substrates preferably include a catalyst. For example, the substrate can be made of a catalyst, impregnated with a catalyst or coated with a catalyst. Exemplary catalysts include precious metals such as platinum, palladium and rhodium, and other types of components such as base metals or zeolites.
In one non-limiting embodiment, a catalytic converter can have a cell density of at least 200 cells per square inch, or in the range of 200-400 cells per square inch. A preferred catalyst for a catalytic converter is platinum with a loading level greater than 30 grams/cubic foot of substrate. In other embodiments the precious metal loading level is in the range of 30-100 grams/cubic foot of substrate. In certain embodiments, the catalytic converter can be sized such that in use, the catalytic converter has a space velocity (volumetric flow rate through the DOC/volume of DOC) less than 150,000/hour or in the range of 50,000-150,000/hour.
Still referring to
In use, the exhaust gases are directed into the exhaust conduit 11 through the inlet aperture 16 as indicated by arrows 13. The exhaust gases are then directed though the tapered inlet conduit 20 which allows for expansion of the gases as they flow toward the major diameter end 22 of the tapered conduit 20 and the approach the flow distributor element 40. The diffused exhaust gas interacts with and flows through the distributor element 40 and enters into an internal region or volume 24 of the exhaust system 10 defined by the conduit 11. Finally, the exhaust gas flows through the aftertreatment device 30 and out the downstream end of the conduit 11.
Now referring to both
Still referring to both
Referring specifically to
In the embodiment shown, the plate 54 includes a generally circular aperture 52 disposed at the center of the plate 54 and twelve pie or wedge shaped flow-distribution holes 50 disposed evenly around the circular aperture 52. The wedge shaped apertures are separated by radially extending strips of plate referred to herein as deflectors 64. In the embodiment shown, the deflectors 64 are uniform in shape with a width W2 that remains relatively constant from a first end 60 near the center of the plate 54 to a second end 62 near the periphery of the plate 54. However, it will be appreciated that the shapes of the deflectors can be varied without departing from the principles of the present invention.
It is also noted that a majority of the region of the plate 54 defined within the intermediate peripheral boundary 58 is open to allow exhaust flow to pass therethrough. In certain embodiments, the sum of the open spaces within the boundary 58 divided by the overall area defined inside the boundary 58 is greater than or equal to 75 percent. In other words, the plate 54 is at least seventy-five percent open and less than twenty-five percent closed within the boundary 58. It should be appreciated that a number of different arrangements and shapes of apertures are possible. The open configuration of the plate assists in minimizing the backpressure generated by the plate 54. The tapered transition provided by the tapered inlet conduit 20 also assists in minimizing backpressure.
Referring to
The above-described convex configuration is advantageous since it inhibits “oil canning” or fluctuation under heavy flow and vibration conditions. In addition, the convex configuration allows the plate 54 to direct the flow to the periphery of the flow path without impeding the flow by abruptly changing its direction. In the embodiment shown, no major surface of the plate 54 within the intermediate periphery edge 58 is disposed perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 3 of the muffler assembly 10. Such a construction enables the plate 54 to modify the natural non-uniform flow profile to a more uniform flow profile without significantly decreasing the overall flow rate.
It will be appreciated that flow distribution element 40 can also be used with other muffler configurations such as horizontal mufflers. Also, in other embodiments, multiple aftertreatment devices (e.g., multiple catalytic converters, multiple diesel particulate filters, or combinations of catalytic converters and diesel particulate filters) can be mounted in the muffler downstream from the flow distributor. Moreover, flow distribution elements in accordance with the present disclosure can be used in other types of exhaust conduits in addition to muffler bodies.
The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/238,647, filed Sep. 28, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/615,180, filed Oct. 1, 2004, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
677357 | Hyde | Jul 1901 | A |
2363236 | Fluor | Nov 1944 | A |
2721619 | Cheairs | Oct 1955 | A |
2732913 | Higgins | Jan 1956 | A |
3180712 | Hamblin | Apr 1965 | A |
3322508 | Ungerleider | May 1967 | A |
3380810 | Hamblin | Apr 1968 | A |
3445196 | Thomas | May 1969 | A |
3606611 | Wright | Sep 1971 | A |
3645093 | Thomas | Feb 1972 | A |
3672464 | Rowley et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3719457 | Nagamatsu | Mar 1973 | A |
3754398 | Mattavi | Aug 1973 | A |
3780772 | Carnanhan et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3852042 | Wagner | Dec 1974 | A |
3910770 | Kobylinksi et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3964875 | Chang et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3972687 | Frietzsche | Aug 1976 | A |
4002433 | Öser | Jan 1977 | A |
4004887 | Stormont | Jan 1977 | A |
4017347 | Cleveland | Apr 1977 | A |
4032310 | Ignoffo | Jun 1977 | A |
4050903 | Bailey et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4054418 | Miller et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4065918 | Rifkin | Jan 1978 | A |
4086063 | Garcea | Apr 1978 | A |
4124091 | Mizusawa | Nov 1978 | A |
4183896 | Gordon | Jan 1980 | A |
4209493 | Olson | Jun 1980 | A |
4297116 | Cusick | Oct 1981 | A |
4328188 | Kawata | May 1982 | A |
4368799 | Wagner | Jan 1983 | A |
4393652 | Munro | Jul 1983 | A |
4416674 | McMahon et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4426844 | Nakano | Jan 1984 | A |
4427836 | Kowalski et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4538413 | Shinzawa et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4541240 | Munro | Sep 1985 | A |
4580657 | Schmeichel et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4601168 | Harris | Jul 1986 | A |
4632216 | Wagner et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4634459 | Pischinger et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4652286 | Kusuda et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4730454 | Pischinger et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4732743 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4797263 | Oza | Jan 1989 | A |
4851015 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4854123 | Inoue | Aug 1989 | A |
4866932 | Morita et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4867768 | Wagner et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4890690 | Fischer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4902309 | Hempenstall | Feb 1990 | A |
4969537 | Wagner et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5021227 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5043147 | Knight | Aug 1991 | A |
5053062 | Barris et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5065576 | Kanazawa et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5082478 | Oono et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5110560 | Presz, Jr. et al. | May 1992 | A |
5139107 | Nagai | Aug 1992 | A |
5140813 | Whittenberger | Aug 1992 | A |
5170020 | Kruger et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171341 | Merry | Dec 1992 | A |
5184464 | Harris | Feb 1993 | A |
5185998 | Brew | Feb 1993 | A |
5209062 | Vollenweider | May 1993 | A |
5220789 | Riley et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5234672 | Ruscheweyh | Aug 1993 | A |
5307628 | Castagne | May 1994 | A |
5321215 | Kicinski | Jun 1994 | A |
5322537 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5339630 | Pettit | Aug 1994 | A |
5355973 | Wagner et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5378435 | Gavoni | Jan 1995 | A |
5408828 | Kreucher et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5426269 | Wagner et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5453116 | Fischer et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457945 | Adiletta | Oct 1995 | A |
5484575 | Steenackers | Jan 1996 | A |
5584178 | Naegeli et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5611832 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5643536 | Schmelz | Jul 1997 | A |
5720787 | Kasai et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732555 | Gracyalny et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737918 | Khinsky et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5758497 | Frederiksen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771689 | Bareis et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5808245 | Wiese et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828013 | Wagner et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5908480 | Ban et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916134 | Yang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921079 | Harris | Jul 1999 | A |
5992141 | Berriman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003305 | Martin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6041594 | Brenner et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050088 | Brenner | Apr 2000 | A |
6082487 | Angelo et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6159429 | Bemel | Dec 2000 | A |
6550573 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6712869 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6892854 | Wagner et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
20020073698 | D'Herde et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020162319 | Crocker et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030175175 | Shishido et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
721202 | Nov 1965 | CA |
796934 | Oct 1968 | CA |
673 707 | Mar 1939 | DE |
2 314 465 | Oct 1974 | DE |
40 17 267 | Dec 1990 | DE |
44 17 238 | Sep 1994 | DE |
0 158 625 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 220 484 | May 1987 | EP |
0 220 505 | May 1987 | EP |
0 226 022 | Jun 1987 | EP |
2 197 411 | Mar 1974 | FR |
2 718 188 | Oct 1995 | FR |
2 383 548 | Jul 2003 | GB |
54-137530 | Oct 1979 | JP |
57-158917 | Sep 1982 | JP |
60-169619 | Sep 1985 | JP |
62-160726 | Jul 1987 | JP |
63-140123 | Jun 1988 | JP |
3-10016 | Jan 1991 | JP |
3-21313 | Jan 1991 | JP |
5-288047 | Nov 1993 | JP |
1163889 | Jun 1985 | SU |
WO 8901566 | Feb 1989 | WO |
WO 9324744 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9506510 | Mar 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090031717 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60615180 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11238647 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 12252138 | US |