The disclosure of Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-027778 filed on Feb. 17, 2016 including the specification, drawings and abstract is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to an exhaust gas control apparatus for an internal combustion engine.
2. Description of Related Art
There is known a selective reduction-type NOx (nitrogen oxides) catalyst (which is hereinafter also simply referred to as “SCR catalyst”) that purifies NOx contained in exhaust gas of an internal combustion engine with ammonia as a reducing agent. A filter that catches particulate matter (hereinafter referred to as PM) in the exhaust gas is known to carry the SCR catalyst. On an upstream side of the SCR catalyst, an addition valve may be disposed to supply urea water into the exhaust gas. The urea water added to the exhaust gas is hydrolyzed by heat of the exhaust gas or heat of the SCR catalyst to generate ammonia, and the ammonia is adsorbed by the SCR catalyst.
Urea water is frozen at about −11° C., for example. Therefore, when ambient temperature is low, urea water may possibly freeze in the addition valve or in a urea water supply passage after the internal combustion engine is stopped. When the urea water freezes, there are possibilities that the urea water cannot be added after the start of the internal combustion engine, or the addition valve and the urea water supply passage are damaged. After the stop of the internal combustion engine, the temperature of the addition valve temporarily becomes higher than the temperature during operation of the internal combustion engine due to the heat that the addition valve receives from the exhaust gas and from peripheral component members. In this case, if the urea water exists inside the addition valve, deposits may be formed from the urea water in the addition valve, and the deposits may cause wear of a sliding portion in the addition valve and may cause clogging of the addition valve. Furthermore, due to the temperature increase in the addition valve after the stop of the internal combustion engine, urea may be hydrolyzed within the addition valve to generate ammonia. The ammonia may corrode the addition valve.
Accordingly, after the stop of the internal combustion engine, the urea water in the addition valve and in the urea water supply passage is sucked back to a tank (see, for example, Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2008-101564).
When urea water is sucked back to the tank by making the urea water flow backward, the addition valve is opened and the exhaust gas of the internal combustion engine flows into the addition valve through an exhaust passage. That is, in the addition valve and the urea water passage, the urea water is replaced with exhaust gas of the internal combustion engine. Here, in the case where the exhaust gas around the addition valve contains PM, the PM in the exhaust gas is easily sucked into the addition value together with the exhaust gas in the exhaust passage when the urea water is sucked back to the tank immediately after the stop of the internal combustion engine. Even in the case where the urea water in the addition valve is sucked back, the urea water, though small in amount, still remains in the addition valve since it is difficult to completely suck the urea water back from places such as gaps in the sliding portion in the addition valve. Since the temperature of the exhaust gas in the exhaust passage is still high at the time immediately after the stop of the internal combustion engine, sucking the high-temperature exhaust gas increases the temperature of the addition valve. Therefore, when the urea water is sucked back immediately after the stop of the internal combustion engine, the temperature of the addition valve increases, which causes increase in the temperature of the urea water remaining in places such as the sliding portion of the addition valve, As a result, PM can be mixed into the high-temperature urea water. Here, it has been found out that under high temperature and the existence of urea water, agglomeration of PM is promoted by urea water and easily causes clogging of the addition valve or wear of the sliding portion of the addition valve. It is considered that the particle size of PM is increased by the urea water, and the particle size of deposits caused by urea is increased by PM. Based on this consideration, both the PM and the deposits are regarded as a mixture of the deposits and the PM caused by urea. Therefore, in the following description, both the PM and the deposits are simply described as deposits.
Furthermore, when the temperature of the addition valve is increased by sucking the high-temperature exhaust gas into the addition valve, deposits are formed due to the urea water remaining, in the addition valve. It has also been found out that when deposits are formed under the existence of PM, the deposits are agglomerated by the PM and the particle size of the deposits becomes larger. Furthermore, some of the deposits from the urea water are hardly soluble in water. When such deposits that are hardly soluble in water are formed in the addition valve, and the particle size of the deposits becomes larger than the diameter of a nozzle hole, it becomes difficult to remove the deposits out of the addition valve since the deposits do not solve even when urea water is passed through the addition valve afterward. Accordingly, the deposits may possibly cause wear in the addition valve or clogging of the addition valve. When a filter is not provided in the exhaust passage on the upstream side of the addition valve, a larger amount of PM is sucked through the addition valve, and increase in the particle size of the deposits becomes more notable. Even when the filter is provided on the upstream side of the addition valve, it is still difficult to catch all the PM with the filter. Furthermore, deposits can still be formed inside the addition valve by sucking high-temperature exhaust gas into the addition valve. Thus, even when the urea water is sucked back to the tank, the urea water remaining in the addition valve and the PM sucked into the addition valve can cause increase in the particle size of the deposits. As a result, wear in the addition valve or clogging of the addition valve may occur.
The present disclosure provides an exhaust gas control apparatus for an internal combustion engine that suppresses wear in an addition valve or clogging of the addition valve that are caused by increase in the particle size of deposits.
An exhaust gas control apparatus for an internal combustion engine according to one aspect of the present disclosure includes an addition valve, a tank, a urea water passage, a pump, a selective reduction-type NOx catalyst, and an electronic control unit. The addition valve is configured to add urea water to an exhaust passage of the internal combustion engine. The tank is configured to store the urea water. The urea water passage connects the addition valve and the tank so as to circulate the urea water. The pump is configured to circulate the urea water to the urea water passage. The selective reduction-type nitrogen oxides (NOx) catalyst is disposed in a portion of the exhaust passage on a downstream side of the addition valve. The selective reduction-type NOx catalyst is configured to purify nitrogen oxides in the exhaust passage using the urea water. The electronic control unit configured to: (i) control the pump, as a first control, such that a specified amount of the urea water stored in the addition valve and the urea water passage is returned to the tank after the internal combustion engine is stopped; (ii) control the pump, as a second control, such that the specified amount or more of the urea water in the tank is discharged from the tank to the urea water passage after the first control is executed; and (iii) control the pump, as a third control, such that all the urea water stored in the addition valve and the urea water passage is returned to the tank after the second control is executed.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, addition of the urea water from the addition valve is stopped after the internal combustion engine is stopped. Accordingly, the heat to be taken away from the addition valve by the urea water is decreased. Moreover, since heat moves from the exhaust gas and the exhaust passage to the addition valve, the temperature of the addition valve tends to increase. Then, the temperature of a front end portion of the addition valve exposed to the exhaust gas of the internal combustion engine becomes highest among portions of the addition valve. To cope with the temperature increase, the first control is executed after the stop of the internal combustion engine to return a specified amount of urea water in the addition valve and the urea water passage to the tank side, so that the urea water can be kept away from the front end portion of the addition valve having the highest temperature. Accordingly, since the increase in temperature of the urea water can be suppressed, a formation amount of the deposits can be reduced. Furthermore, it becomes possible to suppress generation of ammonia from urea water inside the addition valve. That is, the specified amount used herein is set as the amount of sucked-back urea water that can suppress formation of deposits and generation of ammonia from the urea water. In the first control, all the urea water in the addition valve and the urea water passage may be returned to the tank, or some of the urea water in the addition valve and the urea water passage may be returned to the tank.
However, after the first control is executed, deposits may still be formed from the urea water that remains in places such as the sliding portion inside the addition valve. When PM flows into the addition valve at the time of executing the first control, the particle size of the deposits tends to become larger. Therefore, the particle size of the deposits may become larger beyond an allowable range. To cope with the increase in the particle size, the second control is executed after the first control is executed to discharge the specified amount or more of urea water from the tank. Accordingly, the amount of urea water equal to or more than the amount of the urea water returned to the tank in the first control is discharged toward the addition valve from the tank. As a result, the urea water washes out the deposits to the exhaust passage. That is, before the particle size of the deposits becomes larger beyond the allowable range, the deposits can be discharged to the exhaust passage. When the second control is executed, the urea water circulates to the addition valve such that the urea water takes away heat from the addition valve. As a result, the temperature of the addition valve can be lowered. This makes it possible to suppress formation of deposits from the urea water that remains in places such as the sliding portion inside the addition valve even with the third control being executed. It also becomes possible to suppress increase in the particle size of deposits if the deposits are formed. Thus, wear in the addition valve or clogging of the addition valve caused by increase in the particle size of deposits can be suppressed.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, the specified amount in the first control may be smaller than a capacity of the addition valve and the urea water passage. That is, while all the urea water in the addition valve and the urea water passage is returned to the tank in the third control, some of the urea water in the addition valve and the urea water passage may be returned to the tank in the first control.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, high-temperature exhaust gas may be sucked into the addition valve by executing the first control. Accordingly, the temperature of the addition valve may increase. Furthermore, PM may also be sucked into the addition valve due to the first control. As described before, under high temperature and existence of PM, the particle size of deposits tends to become larger. Accordingly, in order to suppress increase in the particle size of deposits, the amount of PM sucked into the addition valve in the first control may be reduced. That is, the amount of urea water sucked back in the first control may be reduced. Here, the amount of urea water returning to the tank is made smaller in the first control than in the third control, so that the amount of exhaust gas of the internal combustion engine that flows into the addition valve through the exhaust passage becomes restrictive in the first control. As a result, the amount of PM flowing into the addition valve can be reduced, Therefore, executing the first control makes it possible to suppress generation of ammonia inside the addition valve, while suppressing increase in the particle size of the deposits.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, the addition valve or the urea water passage may include a radiator configured to radiate heat from the addition valve or the urea water passage. When the radiator is included, the specified amount in the first control may be equal to or more than a capacity of a portion extending from a front end of the addition valve to an end portion of the radiator on a tank side.
According to the exhaust gas control apparatus in the aspect, the heat received from the front end side of the addition valve is transferred toward the radiator and is then radiated by the radiator. Accordingly, a region extending from the radiator to an exhaust passage side is high in temperature, while a region closer to the tank than the radiator is lower in temperature than the region extending from the radiator to the exhaust passage side. Therefore, in the first control, at least an amount of the urea water corresponding to the capacity of a portion extending from the front end of the addition valve to the end portion of the radiator on the tank side may be sucked back to the tank, so that the urea water can be kept away from the region having relatively high temperature. Accordingly, since the increase in the temperature of the urea water can be suppressed, generation of ammonia and formation of deposits can be suppressed. Since the amount of sucked-back urea water becomes restrictive in the first control, the amount of PM sucked into the addition valve can be reduced. As a result, it becomes possible to suppress increase in the particle size of the deposits caused by the urea water remaining in places such as gaps in the addition valve.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, the urea water passage may be higher in resistance against corrosion by ammonia than the addition valve. In this case, the specified amount in the first control may be the capacity of the addition valve.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, at least an amount of urea water corresponding to the capacity of the addition valve is returned to the tank, so that the urea water can be kept away from the region of the addition valve having relatively high temperature. Even if ammonia is generated, generation of ammonia. occurs in the urea water passage with high resistance against corrosion by ammonia. As a result, it becomes possible to suppress corrosion of the addition valve and to suppress corrosion of the urea water passage by ammonia. Since the amount of sucked-back urea water becomes restrictive in the first control, the amount of PM sucked into the addition valve can be reduced. As a result, it becomes possible to suppress increase in the particle size of the deposits caused by the urea water remaining in places such as gaps in the addition valve.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, the electronic control unit may be configured to execute the first control, the second control, and the third control when a temperature of exhaust gas at time of stopping the internal combustion engine is equal to or more than a predetermined temperature. The electronic control unit may be configured to control the pump, as fourth control, such that all the urea water stored in the addition valve and the urea water passage returns to the tank without executing the first control, the second control, and the third control, when the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is less than the predetermined temperature.
Depending on the operating state before the stop of the internal combustion engine, the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine may be too low to cause increase in the particle size of deposits. In such a case, the particle size of the deposits is hardly increased by the urea water that still remains in places such as gaps in the addition valve even after all the urea water is sucked back to the tank immediately after the stop of the internal combustion engine. Therefore, it is not necessary to suck the urea water back to the tank and then discharge the sucked-back urea water from the tank so as to discharge the deposits from the addition valve to the exhaust passage. That is, the control of returning all the urea water in the addition valve and the urea water passage to the tank may be executed only once to suppress freezing of the urea water. In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, when the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is less than the predetermined temperature, it becomes unnecessary to suck the urea water back to the tank and then discharge the sucked-back urea water from the tank and to suck the urea water back again to the tank. As a result, it becomes possible to reduce power consumption in the pump and the control device, The predetermined temperature is an exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the engine assuming that the first control is executed, the exhaust gas temperature having a possibility of causing increase in the particle size of deposits beyond the allowable range. The allowable range of the particle size of the deposits is determined in consideration of wear of the addition valve and clogging of the addition valve. For example, when the particle size of the deposits becomes larger than the diameter of a nozzle hole of the addition valve, clogging of the addition valve occurs. Accordingly, the allowable range of the particle size of the deposits is set to a value that is smaller than the diameter of the nozzle hole of the addition valve so as not to cause clogging of the addition valve.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, the electronic control unit may be configured to make a period from time of ending the first control to time of starting the second control shorter and make a period from time of ending the second control to time of starting the third control longer as the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is higher.
More specifically, the time of ending the first control may not coincide with the time of starting the second control. The period from the time of ending the first control to the time of starting the second control may be changed based on the temperature of exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine. Similarly, time of ending the second control may not coincide with time of starting the third control. The period from the time of ending the second control to the time of starting the third control may be changed based on the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine. Here, when the time of ending the first control does not coincide with the time of starting the second control, and the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of ending the first control is high, then the particle size of deposits tends to increase after the time of ending the first control. Therefore, since the particle size of the deposits exceeds the allowable range soon after the first control is ended, it is preferable to start the second control earlier. In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, the second control is started earlier, so that the deposits can be discharged from the addition valve before the particle size of the deposits exceed the allowable range. Here, the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine relates to subsequent temperature of the exhaust gas. As the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is higher, the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of ending the first control becomes higher. That is, as the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is higher, the particle size of the deposits tends to increase after the end of the first control. Therefore, it becomes possible to suppress increase in the particle size of the deposits beyond the allowable range by making the period from the time of ending the first control to the time of starting the second control shorter as the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is higher.
Meanwhile, when the third control is started while the temperature of the exhaust gas is high, the temperature of the addition valve may increase to cause formation of deposits and to further cause increase in the particle size of the deposits. In this ease, as the period from the time of ending the second control to the time of starting the third control is made longer, the amount of heat radiated from the exhaust passage to the outside air increases, and thereby the temperature of the exhaust gas is lowered. Here, as described in the foregoing, the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is related to subsequent temperature of the exhaust gas. As the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is higher, the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of ending the second control becomes higher. That is, as the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is higher, the particle size of the deposits tends to increase when the third control is executed early. Therefore, it becomes possible to adequately lower the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of starting the third control by making the period from the time of ending the second control to the time of starting the third control longer as the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine is higher. This makes it possible to more reliably suppress formation of deposits and increase in the particle size of the deposits.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, the electronic control unit may be configured to control the pump, as the second control, such that the specified amount or more of the urea water in the tank is discharged to the urea water passage and that the temperature of the exhaust gas becomes lower than an allowable temperature.
In the exhaust gas control apparatus according to the aspect, when the second control is executed, the urea water passes the addition valve so that the urea water takes away heat from the addition valve. As a consequence, the temperature of the addition valve is lowered. The temperature of the exhaust gas is also lowered by injection of the urea water to the exhaust gas. Therefore, the temperature of the exhaust gas can swiftly be decreased by continuing the second control. When the second control is continued until the temperature of the exhaust gas becomes lower than the allowable temperature, formation of deposits and increase in the particle size of the deposits can more reliably be suppressed even with the third control being executed afterward. The allowable temperature is a temperature of the exhaust gas at which the particle size of the deposits falls within an allowable range even with the third control being executed.
According to the present disclosure, wear in the addition valve or clogging of the addition valve caused by increase in the particle size of deposits can be suppressed.
Features, advantages, and technical and industrial significance of exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like numerals denote like elements, and wherein:
The modes of carrying out the present disclosure will exemplarily be described below in detail with reference to the drawings. It is to be noted that sizes, materials, shapes, and relative arrangements of component members disclosed in the embodiments are not intended to restrict the scope of the present disclosure thereto unless otherwise specified. The embodiments disclosed below may be combined to the extent possible.
The internal combustion engine 1 is connected to an exhaust passage 2. The exhaust passage 2 is equipped with a filter 3 that carries a selective reduction-type NOx catalyst 31 (hereinafter referred to as “SCR catalyst 31”) that selectively reduces NOx in exhaust gas with ammonia as a reducing agent. The filter 3 is a wall flow-type filter that catches PM in the exhaust gas. The SCR catalyst 31 adsorbs ammonia and reduces NOx in the exhaust gas with the ammonia as a reducing agent. Although the filter 3 carries the SCR catalyst 31 in the present embodiment, only the SCR catalyst 31 may be provided as the filter 3 is not essential.
The exhaust passage 2 on the upstream side of the SCR catalyst 31 has an addition valve 42 provided to supply the reducing agent to the SCR catalyst 31. The addition valve 42 is a component member of a reducing agent feeder 4. The reducing agent feeder 4 includes a tank 41, the addition valve 42, a urea water passage 43, and a pump 44.
The tank 41 stores urea water. The addition valve 42 is attached to a portion of the exhaust passage 2 on the upstream side of the SCR catalyst 31. The urea water passage 43 connects the tank 41 and the addition valve 42 to circulate the urea water.
The pump 44 is provided inside the tank 41 to discharge the urea water. The pump 44 discharges the urea water from the tank 41 side to the addition valve 42 side during normal rotation, while discharging the urea water from the addition valve 42 side to the tank 41 side during reverse rotation. The pump 44 may be provided in the urea water passage 43 instead of in the tank 41. The pump 44 is an electric pump that rotates with supplied electric power. Therefore, the pump 44 can operate while the internal combustion engine 1 is stopped. When the pump 44 is normally rotated and the addition valve 42 is opened, the urea water is pumped through the urea water passage 43, and the urea water is added to the exhaust gas. The urea water added to the exhaust gas is hydrolyzed by the heat of the exhaust gas, and ammonia is generated thereby. The ammonia is adsorbed by the SCR catalyst 31. With the ammonia adsorbed by the SCR catalyst 31 serving a reducing agent, NOx in the exhaust gas is selectively reduced. The exhaust passage 2 on the upstream side of the addition valve 42 also has a temperature sensor 11 provided to detect temperature of the exhaust gas.
Along with the internal combustion engine 1 configured as described before, an ECU 10 serving as an electronic control unit is provided to control the internal combustion engine 1. The ECU 10 controls the internal combustion engine 1 in accordance with an operating condition of the internal combustion engine 1 or a request of an operator.
The ECU 10, which is connected to a temperature sensor 11 through an electric line, receives an output signal of the temperature sensor 11. The ECU 10 estimates the temperature of the addition valve 42 and the SCR catalyst 31 during operation of the internal combustion engine 1 based on the output signal of the temperature sensor 11. The temperature of the addition valve 42 and the temperature of the SCR catalyst 31 may also be estimated based on the operating state of the internal combustion engine 1. The ECU 10 is connected to the addition valve 42 and the pump 44 through an electric line. The addition valve 42 and the pump 44 are controlled by the ECU 10.
During operation of the internal combustion engine 1, the ECU 10 executes reducing agent addition control that is control of supplying a reducing agent to the SCR catalyst 31 to reduce NOx in the exhaust gas that passes through the SCR catalyst 31. In the reducing agent addition control, the pump 44 is operated and the addition valve 42 is opened to add the urea water from the addition valve 42 to the exhaust gas, so that ammonia is supplied to the SCR catalyst 31 as a reducing agent. At this time, the amount of the urea water added to the exhaust gas from the addition valve 42 is determined based on the amount of NOx discharged from the internal combustion engine 1.
When the internal combustion engine 1 is stopped, the ECU 10 executes suck-back control that is control of returning the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 to the tank 41. Here, since the urea water is added to the exhaust gas through the addition valve 42 during operation of the internal combustion engine 1, the urea water remains in the addition valve 42 and in the urea water passage 43 at the time when the internal combustion engine 1 is stopped. After the stop of the internal combustion engine 1, the heat moves from the exhaust passage 2 to the addition valve 42, which temporarily increases the temperature of the addition valve 42. Accordingly, when urea water exists in the addition valve 42, the urea water is hydrolyzed inside the addition valve 42 to generate ammonia, which may corrode the addition valve 42. Furthermore, deposits may be formed due to urea. When the urea water remains in the addition valve 42 and in the urea water passage 43 while ambient temperature is low, the temperature of the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 may drop and freeze after the lapse of a certain amount of time from the stop of the internal combustion engine 1.
Accordingly, the ECU 10 executes the suck-back control after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1. In the suck-back control, the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 is made to flow backward to the tank 41 so as to remove the urea water from the inside of the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43. In this case, the ECU 10 reverses the pump 44 and opens the addition valve 42 to make the urea water flow backward such that the urea water is sucked into the tank 41 while the exhaust gas of the internal combustion engine 1 is sucked into the addition valve 42. The suck-back control is preferably started immediately after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 so as to suppress generation of ammonia or formation of deposits.
That is, the suck-back control is preferably started, for example, at the time when speed of the internal combustion engine 1 becomes zero. However, the suck-back control may be started not at the time point when the speed of the internal combustion engine 1 becomes zero but within a specified time after the time point when the speed of the internal combustion engine 1 becomes zero, the specified time being a time limit when generation of ammonia or formation of deposits can be suppressed.
However even with the suck-back control being executed, a small amount of the urea water may still remain in places such as gaps between members that constitute the addition valve 42. Furthermore, when the suck-back control is executed, the exhaust gas of the internal combustion engine 1 staying in the exhaust passage 2 still has a high temperature, and the high-temperature exhaust gas flows into the addition valve 42 due to the suck-back control. This increases the temperature of the addition valve 42. As a result, deposits that are hardly soluble in water (for example, cyanuric acid) may be formed from the urea water. Since a filter does not exist on the upstream side of the addition valve 42, a relatively large amount of PM exists in the exhaust gas around the addition valve 42, During the suck-back control, the PM is also sucked into the addition valve 42. It has been found out that when PM exists in the urea water, the particle size of the deposits becomes larger.
Here,
Therefore, if the suck-back control is executed immediately after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1, the PM concentration in the addition valve 42 goes up and the temperature of the addition valve 42 becomes higher. As a result, the deposits caused by urea are formed, Furthermore, the PM and the deposits caused by urea attract each other inside the addition valve 42, so that the particle size of the deposits can become larger. Thus, when the particle size of the deposits increases, clogging of the addition valve 42 may occur, or the sliding portion in the addition valve 42 may be worn away.
Here,
In
At time T2, all the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 is sucked back to the tank 41 by the pump 44. That is, at time T2, the suck-back command changes from ON to OFF, and the suck-back control is ended. When the suck-back command changes from ON to OFF, the temperature of the addition valve 42 is still high. Here, the urea water, though small in amount, still remains in places such as gaps in the addition valve 42 even after the suck-back control is executed as described before. Accordingly, when the temperature of the addition valve 42 increases after T1, deposits are formed. The deposition amount in this case is smaller than that in the case where the suck-back control is not executed, because the suck-back control causes most of the urea water in the addition valve 42 to be sucked back. However, if the conventional suck-back control is executed, the particle size of the deposits tends to increase due to PM sucked into the addition valve 42. Therefore, clogging or wear of the addition valve 42 may occur due to the deposits.
Accordingly, in the present embodiment, the following control is executed instead of the conventional suck-back control illustrated in
In
In
At time T2, the sweep-out command is turned ON at the same time as the suck-back command is turned OFF. Accordingly, the second control is started at time T2. Thus, in the present embodiment, the first control and the second control are continuously executed. While it takes time for the urea water to reach the addition valve 42 after the start of the second control, the gas inside the urea water passage 43 is pushed by the urea water discharged from the pump 44 and passes through the addition valve 42, so that the deposits may be discharged into the exhaust passage 2 together with the gas. Therefore, the deposition amount can decrease at time T2. Since the high-temperature exhaust gas does not flow into the addition valve 42 after time T2, increase in the particle size of the deposits is also suppressed. This makes it possible to prevent the particle size of the deposits from reaching a limit particle size. The limit particle size is a particle size of the deposits when the influence of the deposits on clogging and wear of the addition valve 42 may exceed an allowable range. For example, the limit particle size may be a particle size somewhat smaller than the diameter of the nozzle hole of the addition valve 42, the particle size having a possibility of disabling the deposits from passing through the nozzle hole of the addition valve 42 if it becomes any larger.
Furthermore, since the second control causes the urea water to pass through the addition valve 42, the urea water takes away heat of the addition valve 42, which lowers the temperature of the addition valve 42. Then, at the time expressed by T3, the sweep-out command is turned OFF. That is, the second control is ended at T3. Time T3 can be obtained in the same manner as time T2. That is, when the pump 44 is operated with a specified amount of electric power (which may be a specified speed), the time taken for the urea water to move from the tank 41 to the nozzle hole of the addition valve 42 becomes approximately constant. The time is obtained in advance by an experiment or a simulation, so that a period from T2 to T3 is determined. A flowmeter of the urea water may also be provided in the tank 41, and when an integrated amount of a flow rate of the urea water, which is measured by the flowmeter, reaches an amount of the urea water added from the addition valve 42, that point of time may be defined as T3. In
Since it is necessary to suppress freezing of the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43, the third control is executed after the second control is executed. In
As described in the foregoing, the first control can suppress generation of ammonia from the urea water. Accordingly, it becomes possible to suppress occurrence of corrosion in the addition valve 42. Furthermore, when the first control is executed, only a small amount of urea water remains in the addition valve 42, and therefore formation of a large amount of the deposits can be suppressed. The second control can discharge the deposits and PM in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 to the exhaust passage 2. Furthermore, since the second control can lower the temperature of the addition valve 42, progress of formation of the deposits inside the addition valve 42 can be suppressed. Furthermore, the third control can remove the urea water from the inside of the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43, so that freezing of the urea water inside the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 can be suppressed. When the third control is executed, the exhaust gas temperature and the temperature of the addition valve 42 are low enough to be able to suppress progress of formation of the deposits inside the addition valve 42 even with the urea water remaining in places such as the gaps between the members that constitute the addition valve 42. Thus, since formation of the deposits in the addition valve 42 and increase in the particle size of the deposits can be suppressed, wear in the addition valve 42 or clogging of the addition valve 42 can be suppressed.
In step S101, the ECU 10 determines whether or not the internal combustion engine 1 is stopped. In step S101, the ECU 10 determines that the internal combustion engine 1 is stopped, when the engine speed is zero. Since the first control, the second control, and the third control are executed after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1, the ECU 10 determines whether or not a precondition for executing these controls are satisfied in step S101. When positive determination is made in step S101, the processing proceeds to step S102, whereas when the negative determination is made, the processing proceeds to step S114. In step S114, the reducing agent addition control is executed.
In step S102, the ECU 10 determines whether or not the first control is in an unended state. In step S102, it is determined whether or not it is necessary to execute the first control or to continue the first control. When the first control is not executed after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 and when the first control is currently in execution, the ECU 10 determines that the first control is in the unended state. The ECU 10 stores whether or not the first control is executed after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 and whether or not the first control is currently in execution. When positive determination is made in step S102, the processing proceeds to step S103, whereas when negative determination is made, the processing proceeds to step S105.
In step S103, the ECU 10 starts the first control or continues the first control. That is, when the first control is not started yet, the first control is started. When the first control is already started, the first control is continued, in the first control, the ECU 10 reversely rotates the pump 44 and opens the addition valve 42. Once the processing of step S103 is ended, the processing proceeds to step S104.
In step S104, the ECU 10 determines whether or not execution time of the first control is equal to or more than a first predetermined time. The execution time of the first control is counted the ECU 10. The first predetermined time is obtained in advance by an experiment or a simulation as the time taken to suck all the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 back to the tank 41, and is stored in the ECU 10. In step S104, it can be said that the ECU 10 determines whether or not sucking-back of the urea water is completed in the first control. In other words, it can be said that the ECU 10 determines whether or not the amount of urea water returned to the tank 41 becomes equal to or more than an amount corresponding to the capacity of the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43. In the present embodiment, a sucked-back amount of the urea water until all the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 is sucked back to the tank 41 corresponds to the specified amount in the present disclosure. When positive determination is made in step S104, the processing proceeds to step S105, whereas when negative determination is made, the flowchart is tentatively ended.
In step S105, the ECU 10 ends the first control. That is, the ECU 10 stops reverse rotation of the pump 44. In this case, the addition valve 42 may be closed. In the present embodiment, however, the addition valve 42 may be left opened as the second control is executed continuously from the first control. Then, the processing proceeds to step S106.
In step S106, the ECU 10 determines whether or not the second control is in an unended state. In step S106, it is determined whether or not it is necessary to execute the second control or to continue the second control. That is, when the second control is not executed after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 and when the second control is currently in execution, the ECU 10 determines that the second control is in the unended state. The ECU 10 stores whether or not the second control is executed after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1, and whether or not the second control is currently in execution. When positive determination is made in step S106, the processing proceeds to step S107, whereas when negative determination is made, the processing proceeds to step S110.
In step S107, the ECU 10 starts the second control or continues the second control. That is, when the second control is not started yet, the second control is started. When the second control is already started, the second control is continued. In the second control, the ECU 10 normally rotates the pump 44 and opens the addition valve 42. Once the processing of step S107 is ended, the processing proceeds to step S108.
In step S108, the ECU 10 determines whether or not execution time of the second control is equal to or more than second predetermined time. The execution time of the second control is counted by the ECU 10. The second predetermined time herein is obtained in advance by an experiment or a simulation as time taken to fill the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 with urea water and to add the urea water to the exhaust passage 2 from the addition valve 42. The obtained second predetermined time is stored in the ECU 10. In other words, in step S108, it can be said that the ECU 10 determines whether or not the amount of the urea water discharged from the tank 41 becomes equal to or more than the amount corresponding to the capacity of the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43. The second predetermined time in step S108 may be the same as the first predetermined time in step S104, and may be longer than the first predetermined time. When the second predetermined time is made longer than the first predetermined time, more urea water is injected from the addition valve 42 to the exhaust passage 2, so that the deposits can more reliably be discharged. Even when the second predetermined time is defined as the time taken to fill the addition valve 42 with the urea water, the deposits can be discharged out of the addition valve 42 by the gas in the urea water passage 43 as described before, and the deposits pushed by the urea water may be extruded out of the addition valve 42. Therefore, the second control may be executed at least for the same period of time as the time taken to execute the first control. In step S108, it can be said that the ECU 10 determines whether or not discharge of the deposits from the addition valve 42 is completed. The present embodiment represents the case where the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature at the time of ending the second control. When positive determination is made in step S108, the processing proceeds to step S109, whereas when negative determination is made, the flowchart is tentatively ended.
In step S109, the ECU 10 ends the second control. That is, the ECU 10 stops normal rotation of the pump 44, in this case, the addition valve 42 may be closed. In the present embodiment, however, the addition valve 42 may be left opened as the third control is executed continuously from the second control. Then, the processing proceeds to step S110.
In step S110, the ECU 10 starts the third control or continues the third control. That is, when the third control is not started yet, the third control is started. When the third control is already started, the third control is continued. In the third control, the ECU 10 reversely rotates the pump 44 and opens the addition valve 42. The ECU 10 stores whether or not the third control is started after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1, and whether or not the third control is currently in execution. Once the processing of step S110 is ended, the processing proceeds to step S111.
In step S111, the ECU 10 determines whether or not execution time of the third control is equal to or more than third predetermined time. The execution time of the third control is counted by the ECU 10. The third predetermined time in step S111 is the time taken to suck all the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 into the tank 41. The third predetermined time is the same as the first predetermined time in step S104. In step S111, it can be said that the ECU 10 determines whether or not sucking-back of the urea water is completed. When positive determination is made in step S111, the processing proceeds to step S112, whereas when negative determination is made, the flowchart is tentatively ended.
In step S112, the ECU 10 ends the third control. That is, the ECU 10 stops reverse rotation of the pump 44, and opens the addition valve 42. When the processing of step S112 is ended, the processing proceeds to step S113. In step S113, the ECU 10 performs end processing of the flowchart. The end processing is configured to prevent the present flowchart from being performed until the internal combustion engine 1 is restarted. By executing the end processing, the present flowchart is not performed unless the internal combustion engine 1 is restarted.
As described in the foregoing, according to the present embodiment, when the first control is executed, generation of ammonia from urea water can be suppressed. This makes it possible to suppress occurrence of corrosion in the addition valve 42. Moreover, when the second control is executed after the first control is executed, the deposits in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 can be discharged to the exhaust passage 2. Accordingly, clogging or wear of the addition valve 42 can be suppressed. Furthermore, when the third control is executed after the second control is executed, formation of the deposits in the addition valve 42 can be suppressed, while the urea water can be removed from the inside of the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43. Therefore, clogging or wear of the addition valve 42 can be suppressed, while freezing of the urea water inside the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 can be suppressed.
In the present embodiment, the second control is started at the time when the first control is ended. However, it is not necessary to continuously execute the first control and the second control. The second control may be started after a certain amount of time being elapsed from the end of the first control. Similarly, in the present embodiment, the third control is started at the time when the second control is ended. However, it is not necessary to continuously execute the second control and the third control. The third control may be started after a certain amount of time being elapsed from the end of the second control.
For example, the particle size of the deposits after the first control may be estimated, and the second control may be started before the estimated particle size of the deposits reaches the limit particle size. The particle size of the deposits at any given time after the first control is related to the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Therefore, when relation between the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 and the particle size of the deposits at any given time after the first control is obtained in advance by an experiment or a simulation, the particle size of the deposits at any given time after the first control can be estimated based on the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. The second control may be started before the time when the particle size of the deposits reaches the limit particle size. Since the exhaust gas temperature after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 is influenced by ambient temperature, the estimated particle size of the deposits may be corrected based on the ambient temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Furthermore, since the particle size of the deposits is influenced by PM concentration of the exhaust gas, the estimated particle size of the deposits may be corrected based on the PM concentration of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. The PM concentration of the exhaust gas can be estimated from the operating state immediately before the stop of the internal combustion engine 1.
In the first embodiment, the first control, the second control, and the third control are executed after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1. However, when the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 or the temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is sufficiently low, the particle size of the deposits may not increase inside the addition valve 42 even with the PM being sucked into the addition valve 42. Therefore, when the particle size of the deposits caused by the urea water remaining in places such as gaps in the addition valve 42 does not reach the limit particle size after the suck-back control is executed, it is not necessary to execute the sweep-out control afterward.
Here, the temperature of the addition valve 42 after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 can be estimated based on the temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 and on the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. The temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is estimated based on the temperature of the addition valve 42 during operation of the internal combustion engine 1. When the urea water is supplied from the addition valve 42 to the exhaust passage 2 during operation of the internal combustion engine 1, the urea water takes heat away from the addition valve 42, so that the temperature of the addition valve 42 becomes lower than the exhaust gas temperature. Since supply of the urea water is stopped after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1, the heat to be taken away from the addition valve 42 by the urea water decreases. Furthermore, after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1, the addition valve 42 receives heat from the exhaust gas and the exhaust passage 2. Accordingly, the temperature of the addition valve 42 increases after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1. The temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 has a correlation with the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Accordingly, by obtaining the correlation by an experiment or a simulation in advance, the temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 can be obtained based on the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. The exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is exhaust gas temperature detected by the temperature sensor 11 at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. The exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 can also be estimated based on the operating state of the internal combustion engine 1.
During the suck-back control, the addition valve 42 is filled with the exhaust gas from the internal combustion engine 1, and so the temperature of the addition valve 42 during the suck-back control changes with the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. The temperature of the addition valve 42 during the suck-back control also changes with the temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time when the suck-back control is started, i.e., at the time when the internal combustion engine 1 is stopped. Accordingly, when, for example, relation among elapsed time from the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1, the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1, the temperature of the addition valve 42 during the suck-back control is obtained in advance by an experiment or a simulation, and is stored as a map, the temperature of the addition valve 42 during the suck-back control can be obtained from the map based on the elapsed time from the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 and the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Furthermore, correction coefficients are obtained by an experiment or a simulation in advance for correcting the temperature of the addition valve 42 during the suck-back control with a temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of starting the suck-back control. The temperature of the addition valve 42 obtained from the map is multiplied by the correction coefficients so that the temperature of the corrected addition valve 42 can be obtained. Thus, during the suck-back control, the temperature of the addition valve 42 in accordance with the elapsed time from the time of starting the suck-back control and the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 can be obtained. Since increase in the temperature of the addition valve 42 is suppressed by ending the suck-back control, the temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of ending the suck-back control is defined as a highest temperature of the addition valve 42 after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 in the present embodiment.
As described in the foregoing, the temperature of the addition valve 42 during the suck-back control in the case where the suck-back control is executed once is related to the elapsed time from the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 and the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Accordingly, the temperature of the addition valve 42 at any given time can be predicted by using the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 as a parameter. The highest temperature of the addition valve 42 after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 is the temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of ending the suck-back control. Since the time to execute the suck-back control can be obtained in advance, the temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of ending the suck-back control can be obtained based on the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Therefore, it becomes possible to determine whether or not the temperature of the addition valve 42 reaches the limit temperature after the suck-back control is executed, based on the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Hereinafter, the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 when the temperature of the addition valve 42 reaches the limit temperature is defined as a temperature threshold. That is, if the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is less than the temperature threshold, it is not necessary to execute the sweep-out control. In this case, the suck-back control may be executed only once. Thus, the suck-back control executed only once is hereinafter referred to as fourth control. The temperature threshold in the present embodiment corresponds to the predetermined temperature in the present disclosure.
In the flowchart illustrated in
In step S202, the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is acquired. That is, the exhaust gas temperature at the time of performing the processing in the flowchart for the first time after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 is defined as exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. The exhaust gas temperature is detected by the temperature sensor 11. The exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is stored in the ECU 10, Once the processing of step S202. is ended, the processing proceeds to step S203.
In step S203, it is determined whether or not the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is equal to or more than the temperature threshold. In step S203, it is determined whether or not, on the assumption that the suck-back control is executed, the subsequent particle size of the deposits in the addition valve 42 becomes the limit particle size or larger. When positive determination is made in step S203, it is necessary to discharge the deposits from the inside of the addition valve 42. Accordingly, the processing proceeds to step S102 so that the first control, the second control, and the third control are executed. Since the processing after step S102 is similar to the processing of in the flowchart described before, a description thereof is omitted.
Meanwhile, when negative determination is made in step S203, the suck-back control needs to be executed only once. Accordingly, the processing proceeds to step S204, where the fourth control is started, or the fourth control is continued. That is, when the fourth control is not started yet, the fourth control is started. When the fourth control is already started, the fourth control is continued. In the fourth control, the ECU 10 reversely rotates the pump 44 and opens the addition valve 42. The ECU 10 stores whether or not the fourth control is started after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1, and whether or not the fourth control is currently in execution. Once the processing of step S204 is ended, the processing proceeds to step S205.
In step S205, the ECU 10 determines whether or not execution time of the fourth control is equal to or more than fourth predetermined time. The execution time of the fourth control is counted by the ECU 10. The fourth predetermined time in step S205 is the time taken to suck all the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 into the tank 41. The fourth predetermined time is the same as the first predetermined time in step S104. In step S205, the ECU 10 determines whether or not sucking-back of the urea water is completed. When positive determination is made in step S205, the processing proceeds to step S206, whereas when negative determination is made, the flowchart is tentatively ended.
In step S206, the ECU 10 ends the fourth control. That is, the ECU 10 stops reverse rotation of the pump 44, and opens the addition valve 42. When processing of step S206 is completed, the processing proceeds to step S113 and the end processing is performed. As a consequence, the present flowchart is not performed until the internal combustion engine 1 is restarted.
As described in the foregoing, according to the present embodiment, the first control, the second control, and the third control are executed only in the case where the particle size of the deposits is predicted to become the limit particle size or larger when the first control is executed. In the case where the particle size of the deposits is predicted to be less than the limit particle size when the first control is executed, only the fourth control is executed. As a result, it becomes possible to prevent the sweep-out control from being executed more than necessary. This makes it possible to reduce the amount of consumption of electric power.
In the first embodiment and the second embodiment, the third control is started concurrently with the end of the second control. However, when the temperature of the addition valve 42 or the exhaust gas temperature is still high at the time of starting the third control, executing the third control may cause reformation of deposits and increase in the particle size of the deposits to the limit particle size or larger due to the exhaust gas sucked into the addition valve 42. Accordingly, in the present embodiment, the third control is started at the time when the particle size of the deposits is predicted to be less than the limit particle size even with the third control being executed.
Even with the third control being executed, the particle size of the deposits becomes less than the limit particle size if the temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of starting the third control and the exhaust gas temperature at the time of starting the third control are sufficiently low. Accordingly, in the present embodiment, the exhaust gas temperature after the end of the second control is estimated, and the third control is started at the time when the exhaust gas temperature is lowered to a temperature at which the particle size of the deposits is predicted to be less than the limit particle size even with the third control being executed. That is, the third control is started after the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature. The temperature of the addition valve 42 being lower than the valve allowable temperature may be added to the conditions of starting the third control. However, since the temperature of the addition valve 42 is related to the exhaust gas temperature, sufficient fall in the temperature of the addition valve 42 can also be determined based on the exhaust gas temperature.
First, the exhaust gas temperature during the second control is estimated. The exhaust gas temperature during the second control can be estimated based on an exhaust gas temperature at the time of starting the second control, a temperature of the urea water added to the exhaust passage 2, and elapsed time from the time of starting the second control. The exhaust gas temperature at the time of starting the second control is the exhaust gas temperature at the time of ending the first control, which can be estimated based on the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Therefore, the exhaust gas temperature during the second control can be estimated based on the elapsed time from the time of starting the second control, the temperature of the urea water added to the exhaust passage 2, and the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. The temperature of the urea water can be detected by attaching a temperature sensor to the tank 41 or the urea water passage 43, for example.
Furthermore, since the exhaust gas temperature after the end of the second control is related to an exhaust gas temperature at the time of ending the second control and elapsed time from the time of ending the second control, the exhaust gas temperature after the end of the second control can be obtained based on these values. Therefore, when relation among the exhaust gas temperature at the time of ending the second control, the elapsed time from the time of ending the second control, and the exhaust gas temperature after the end of the second control is obtained in advance by an experiment or a simulation, and the obtained relation is stored in the ECU 10, the exhaust gas temperature at any given time after the end of the second control can be obtained.
As described in the foregoing, the parameters necessary to obtain the exhaust gas temperature after the end of the second control are the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1, the temperature of the urea water, and the elapsed time from the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Therefore, the time taken to lower the exhaust gas temperature to less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature after the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 can be obtained from the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 and the temperature of the urea water. The time when the exhaust gas temperature is lowered to less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature is the time of starting the third control. Thus, the time of starting the third control at which the particle size of the deposits becomes less than the limit particle size even with the third control being executed can be obtained from the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 and the temperature of urea water. Relation among a period from the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 to the time of starting the third control, the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1, and the temperature of urea water can be obtained in advance by an experiment or a simulation, and be stored in the ECU 10. The temperature of the urea water is assumed to be constant through the first control to the third control, Thus, the time of starting the third control can be determined at the time when the internal combustion engine 1 is stopped. In the case where the temperature of the urea water is assumed to be constant, the period from the time of ending the second control to the time of starting the third control becomes longer when the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is high than when the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is low.
However, at time T11 when the second control is ended, the exhaust gas temperature is higher than the exhaust gas allowable temperature. Accordingly, the third control is not started at T11. Then, the temperature of the addition valve 42 and the exhaust gas temperature are lowered due to radiation of heat to the atmosphere. Then, at the time expressed by T12 when the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature, the third control is started. That is, the suck-back command is turned ON at time T12. Time T3, which is the time when the third control is ended, is determined in the same way as in the case of time T2 that is when the first control is ended. After the end of the third control at time expressed by T13, the exhaust gas temperature and the temperature of the addition valve 42 are sufficiently low, so that formation of the deposits and increase in the particle size of the deposits are suppressed.
Although the particle size of the deposits is also influenced by the PM concentration, the influence of the PM concentration is regarded to be ignorable in determination of the time of starting the third control, since the time long enough for the PM concentration to become lower than the allowable concentration is considered to elapse by the time of starting the third control. Even when the PM concentration is less than the allowable concentration, there is a possibility that clogging or wear of the addition valve 42 may occur since deposits are formed from urea water when the temperature of the addition valve 42 or the exhaust gas temperature is high. Therefore, even when the PM concentration is less than the allowable concentration, the third control is not started until the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature.
In the flowchart illustrated in
In the flowchart illustrated in
In the present embodiment, the time of starting the third control can be determined at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. However, since a certain amount of time is taken until the third control is started after the internal combustion engine 1 is stopped, the estimated exhaust gas temperature may include an error. Therefore, the time of starting the third control may be determined not at the time when the internal combustion engine 1 is stopped, but by detecting an actual exhaust gas temperature after the end of the second control. For example, the time when the exhaust gas temperature, which is detected by the temperature sensor 11 after the end of the second control, becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature may be defined as the time of starting the third control. The exhaust gas temperature or the temperature of the addition valve 42 may be estimated not only by the estimation method described above but also by other estimation methods, Furthermore, a longest time until the exhaust gas temperature is lowered to less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature after the time of ending the second control may be obtained by an experiment or a simulation in advance, and when the longest time elapses from the time of ending the second control, the third control may be started assuming that the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature.
In the present embodiment, the time to start the third control is determined based on the exhaust gas temperature. However, instead of the exhaust gas temperature, the temperature of the addition valve 42 after the end of the second control may be estimated, and the third control may be started at the point of time when the temperature of the addition valve 42 is lowered to less than the valve allowable temperature. Moreover, for example, the temperature of the addition valve 42 may be determined to be less than the valve allowable temperature when preset time elapses after the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature, and the third control may be started at this point of time. Moreover, transition of the exhaust gas temperature and transition of the temperature of the addition valve 42 may be estimated based on the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1, and when the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature and the temperature of the addition valve 42 becomes less than the addition valve allowable temperature, the third control may be started.
In the third embodiment, the third control is not started until the exhaust gas temperature is lowered to less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature after the end of the second control. In the present embodiment, the second control is continued until the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature, and the third control is started at the time of ending the second control.
Here, when the second control is executed, the urea water takes heat away from the addition valve 42 so that the temperature of the addition valve 42 is lowered. The temperature of the exhaust gas is also lowered when the urea water is injected from the addition valve 42 to the exhaust passage 2. When the exhaust gas temperature at the time of ending the second control is lower than the exhaust gas allowable temperature, the third control can be started at the same time when the second control is ended. Accordingly, standby time of the ECU 10 can be shortened, so that power consumption can be reduced.
After T2, the urea water is supplied to the addition valve 42. Since the urea water takes heat away from the addition valve 42, the temperature of the addition valve 42 is swiftly lowered. The urea water is also injected into the exhaust passage 2, so that the exhaust gas temperature is also swiftly lowered. Then at the time represented by T21, the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than an exhaust gas allowable temperature. Thus, when the exhaust gas temperature reaches the exhaust gas allowable temperature, the ECU 10 ends the second control. That is, the second control is ended, when discharge of the deposits is completed and the exhaust gas temperature is sufficiently lowered. Then, the third control is started at the same time when the second control is ended at T21. Since the exhaust gas temperature is lowered to the exhaust gas allowable temperature at T21, increase in the particle size of the deposits is suppressed even with the third control being executed thereafter. At this moment, time long enough to decrease the PM concentration has elapsed since the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1, and therefore the PM concentration is also less than the allowable concentration. Therefore, the third control is started at T21. Then, the third control is ended at time expressed by T22. Time T22 is determined in the same way as time T2 when the first control is ended. After the third control is ended at the time expressed by T22, formation of the deposits and increase in the particle size of the deposits are suppressed.
In the flowchart illustrated in
As described in the foregoing, according to the present embodiment, the third control can swiftly be started by swiftly lowering the exhaust gas temperature. Accordingly, a period from the stop of the internal combustion engine 1 to the completion of the third control can be shortened, This saves standby electric power that the ECU 10 consumes while waiting for the start of the third control after the end of the second control, so that power consumption can be reduced.
In the above embodiment, the ECU 10 controls the pump 44 and the addition valve 42 so as to return all the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 to the tank 41 in the first control. In the present embodiment, the ECU 10 controls the pump 44 and the addition valve 42 so as to return some of the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 to the tank 41 in the first control. In the third control according to the present embodiment, the ECU 10 controls the pump 44 and the addition valve 42 so as to return all the urea water in the addition valve 42 and the urea water passage 43 to the tank 41 as in the case of the above embodiment.
Here,
Here, if the suck-back control is executed immediately after the stop of the internal combustion engine 1, the PM concentration in the addition valve 42 goes up and the temperature of the addition valve 42 become higher. As a consequence, as described in
Accordingly, in the present embodiment, a minimum amount of urea water that can suppress generation of ammonia and increase in the particle size of the deposits is sucked back in the first control. That is, in the present embodiment, the urea water is sucked back to an end portion of the radiator 105 on the tank 41 side (“suck-back position” in
Here,
Therefore, at the time of executing the first control, the urea water is sucked back at least to the portion of the addition valve 42 on the more tank 41 side than the radiator 105, so that formation of the deposits and generation of ammonia inside the addition valve 42 can be suppressed. Since the amount of exhaust gas sucked from the exhaust passage 2 to the addition valve 42 during the first control can be limited, the amount of PM sucked into the addition valve 42 can also be reduced. Accordingly, even when the deposits are formed, increase in the particle size of the deposits can be suppressed. In the present embodiment, the ECU 10 functions as a control device in the present disclosure by operating the pump 44 to suck hack the urea water up to the end portion of the radiator 105 on the tank 41 side (“suck-back position” in
In the flowchart illustrated in
In the flowchart illustrated in
As described in the foregoing, according to the present embodiment, a minimum necessary amount of the urea water is sucked back to the tank 41 such that a high-temperature region in the addition valve 42 is not filled with the urea water. This makes it possible to suppress generation of ammonia and formation of the deposits. Since the suction amount of PM into the addition valve 42 decreases, increase in the particle size of deposits, if the deposits should be formed, can be suppressed.
In the present embodiment, the urea water is sucked back to the end portion of the radiator 105 on the tank 41 side in the first control. However, the urea water may be sucked back to a portion of the addition valve 42 on the more tank 41 side than the tank 41-side end portion of the radiator 105 instead. For example, in the first control, the urea water may be sucked back to an end portion of the joint portion 104 on the tank 41 side, i.e., a rear end portion of the addition valve 42. Here, when ammonia is generated inside the addition valve 42, corrosion may occur inside the addition valve 42. As a solution, the urea water is sucked back to the rear end portion of the addition valve 42, so that generation of ammonia can be suppressed. As a result, corrosion inside the addition valve 42 can be suppressed. In this case, the amount of sucked-back urea water to the tank 41 when the urea water is sucked back to the rear end portion of the addition valve 42, i.e., the capacity of the addition valve 42, corresponds to the specified amount in the present disclosure. Even if ammonia should be generated inside the urea water passage 43, occurrence of corrosion inside the urea water passage 43 is suppressed since the urea water passage 43 has a higher resistance against corrosion by ammonia than the addition valve 42. The suck-back position in the first control is not limited to the end portion of the radiator 105 on the tank 41 side, but may be the portion of the addition valve 42 on the more tank 41 side than the tank 41-side end portion of the radiator 105. Although the radiator 105 is provided in the addition valve 42 in the present embodiment, the radiator 105 may be provided in the urea water passage 43 instead. In this case, in the first control, urea water may be sucked back to the end portion of the radiator 105 on the tank 41 side.
In the present embodiment, the ECU 10 may determine the execution time of the first control based on the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. That is, the execution time of the first control may be set to the fifth predetermined time when the particle size of the deposits is predicted to become the limit particle size or larger if the execution time of the first control is set to be equal to or more than the first predetermined time described in the first embodiment. When the particle size of the deposits is predicted to become less than the limit particle size, the execution time of the first control may be set to the first predetermined time. Since the particle size of the deposits at the time of ending the first control is correlated with the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1, the execution time of the first control can be determined based on the temperature of the exhaust gas at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1. Relation between the execution time of the first control and the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 may be obtained in advance by an experiment or a simulation, and may be stored in the ECU 10.
In the above embodiment, the second control is started concurrently with the end of the first control. In the first embodiment and the second embodiment, the third control is started concurrently with the end of the second control. However, it is not necessary to start the second control concurrently with the end of the first control and to start the third control concurrently with the end of the second control. If the second control is executed in order to discharge the deposits from the addition valve 42 to the exhaust passage 2, the second control may be started at least when the particle size of the deposits is less than the limit particle size. Accordingly, in the present embodiment, the second control is started at the time that is after the time of ending the first control and that is when the particle size of the deposits is estimated to be less than the limit particle size. In this case, the second control may be started immediately before the time when the particle size of the deposits is estimated to reach the limit particle size.
Here, as the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is higher, the exhaust gas temperature after the end of the first control is higher. As illustrated in
Moreover, if the third control is executed when the temperature of the addition valve 42 or the exhaust gas temperature is still high, reformation of deposits may occur when the exhaust gas is sucked into the addition valve 42, and the particle size of the deposits may become the limit particle size or larger. Accordingly, in the present embodiment, the third control is started at the time when the particle size of the deposits is predicted to be less than the limit particle size even with the third control being executed.
More specifically, in order to prevent the particle size of the deposits from becoming the limit particle size or larger, the temperature of the addition valve 42 at the time of starting the third control and the exhaust gas temperature at the time of starting the third control need to be sufficiently low. Accordingly, in the present embodiment, the third control is started at the time when the particle size of the deposits is predicted to be less than the limit particle size even with the third control being executed. Since the temperature of the addition valve 42 is correlated with the exhaust gas temperature, the exhaust gas temperature may also be used as a basis of determining whether the temperature of the addition valve 42 is sufficiently lowered.
Here, as the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is higher, the time until the exhaust gas temperature is sufficiently lowered becomes longer. Therefore, when the particle size of the deposits is made to become less than the limit particle size even with the third control being executed, a period from the time of ending the second control to the time of starting the third control becomes longer as the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is higher. Accordingly, in the present embodiment, as the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is higher, the period from the time of ending the second control to the time of starting the third control is made longer. Relation between the exhaust gas temperature at the, time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 and the period from the time of ending the second control to the time of starting the third control is obtained in advance by an experiment or a simulation, and the obtained relation is stored in the ECU 10.
At time T33 when the second control is ended, the exhaust gas temperature is higher than the exhaust gas allowable temperature. Then, the exhaust gas temperature is lowered due to radiation of heat to the atmosphere. Time T34 is the time when the suck-back command is turned ON and is also the time when the third control is started. A period from T33 to T34 becomes longer, as the exhaust gas temperature at time T1 is higher. Since the exhaust gas temperature becomes less than the exhaust gas allowable temperature at T34, increase in the particle size of the deposits is suppressed even with the third control being started. Time T35, which is the time when the third control is ended, is determined in the same way as in the case of time T31 that is when the first control is ended.
Since the particle size of the deposits is also influenced by the PM concentration, correction based on the PM concentration may be performed when the time of starting the second control and the time of starting the third control are determined. That is, since the particle size of the deposits tends to increase with higher PM concentration, the period from the time of ending the first control to the time of starting the second control may be shortened, and the period from the time of ending the second control to the time of starting the third control may be lengthened.
In the flowchart illustrated in
In the flowchart illustrated in
In the flowchart illustrated in
As described in the foregoing, according to the present embodiment, as the exhaust gas temperature is higher at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1, the period from the time of ending the first control to the time of starting the second control is made shorter, so that the particle size of the deposits can be prevented from becoming the limit particle size or larger. Moreover, a sufficient time is taken between the time of ending the first control and the time of starting the second control such that the exhaust gas temperature is lowered during the time. As a result, even when the second control is executed thereafter, generation of ammonia can be suppressed. Moreover, as the exhaust gas temperature at the time of stopping the internal combustion engine 1 is higher, the period from the time of ending the second control to the time of starting the third control is made longer. As a result, the exhaust gas temperature is lowered at the time of ending the third control, which makes it possible to prevent the particle size of the deposits from becoming the limit particle size or larger after the end of the third control. Therefore, wear of the addition valve 42 can be suppressed, or occurrence of clogging in the addition valve 42 can be suppressed.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2016-027778 | Feb 2016 | JP | national |