The present disclosure relates to a control system and method for exhaust gas recirculation and, more particularly, to a system and method for controlling an exhaust gas recirculation valve during transient cycles of engine operation to improve fuel consumption efficiency.
Traditionally, many internal combustion engines are typically provided with an exhaust gas recirculation (“EGR”) system to recirculate a portion of the exhaust gas to an intake passage to control the emission and suppress the generation of NOx by lowering maximum combustion temperature and to improve fuel consumption by reducing pumping loss. In such EGR systems, a recirculation control valve for controlling the flow of the recirculation exhaust gas is typically positioned at or near the cylinder head of the internal combustion engine. Moreover, a recirculation exhaust gas inlet through which part of the exhaust gas flowing through an exhaust passage is extracted is formed in an exhaust manifold or an exhaust pipe of the engine.
Recently, in some engine designs, cooled EGR can be used to increase the fuel efficiency since the addition of cooled EGR substantially reduces the knock tendency of the engine, resulting in a potential to increase the engine compression ratio and an opportunity to improve combustion phasing and combustion cycle efficiency. Combining advanced combustion phasing with increased specific heat of the fuel-air mix results in a substantial decrease in combustion temperatures which reduces the need for a rich mixture at even the highest power levels.
A block diagram of an exemplary EGR system is shown in
As further shown, engine 1 includes a combustion chamber 1a, an intake valve 1b for closing communication between the intake line 2 and the combustion chamber 1a, an exhaust-gas valve 1c for closing communication between the exhaust pipe line 6 and the combustion chamber 1a, and a piston 1d which moves vertically in the combustion chamber 1a during operation. The operation of engine 1 is known to those skilled in the art and will not be repeated herein. It should also be appreciated that while only one engine cylinder is shown, the engine configuration contemplated herein is for a four cylinder engine, V6 engine, V8 engine or the like and that the single cylinder is shown in
The EGR components of the system include an EGR valve 8, an exhaust gas intake pipe line 15, an EGR pipe line 16 and a control unit 18. The exhaust gas intake pipe line 15 extends from the exhaust line 6 and is provided to transfer the exhaust gas to the EGR pipe line 16 to recirculate the exhaust gas to the intake manifold 10. Further the control unit 18 is provided to control the EGR valve 8 by outputting a control signal in response to the running state of the engine. Such controls can typically be based on engine operation conditions, including the temperature of engine coolant, the number of engine rotations and the degree of opening the injector (amount of fuel injection). Once the EGR valve is opened (or its positioned is changed) in response to the control signal, exhaust gas flows into the EGR pipe line 16 and returns to the engine combustion chamber 1a through the intake manifold 10 and the intake line 2. Consequently, combustion in the automobile four-cycle engine 1 is suppressed by the amount of non-flammable exhaust gas returned to the combustion chamber 1a. As discussed above, some designs include an EGR cooler 17 that can be provided on exhaust gas intake pipe line 15 to cool the exhaust gas before it is introduced into the intake manifold 10.
In conventional EGR systems, assuming an instantaneous responsive EGR valve, the EGR mass flow rate into the intake manifold 10 equals the total mass flow rate out of the intake manifold 10 into the engine 1 multiplied by the desired mass fraction in the intake manifold. The EGR mass flow rate can be mathematically described by equation (1) as follows:
{dot over (m)}ie=Xde·{dot over (m)}ot (1)
where,
The desired EGR mass fraction Xde is a variable value that is determined by the engine manufacturer to maximize fuel consumption efficiency based on operating conditions. In order to achieve the desired EGR mass fraction Xde, the EGR control valve is electronically actuated by the control unit 18 to varying predefined positions to control the amount of exhaust gas that is recirculated back into the intake manifold 10 via the EGR pipe line 16. The position of the EGR control valve will vary depending on engine operating conditions as discussed above and as would be known to those skilled in the art.
Once the EGR control valve is actuated to a defined position and the exhaust gas is introduced into the intake manifold 10, the amount of exhaust gas (i.e., EGR mass) in the intake manifold 10 increases or decreases in proportion to the amount of air being introduced through the intake lines. The current EGR mass fraction in the intake manifold can be represented by equation (2) as follows:
where,
Based on the foregoing, it should be appreciated that the EGR mass flow out of the intake manifold {dot over (m)}oe is the current EGR mass fraction Xce multiplied by the total mass flow rate {dot over (m)}ot. This result can be represented by equation (3) as follows:
{dot over (m)}oe=Xce·{dot over (m)}ot (3)
where,
When the engine is operating at a steady state, the current EGR mass fraction Xce will equal the desired EGR mass fraction Xde because the EGR flow rate into the intake manifold {dot over (m)}ie will be constant and equal to the EGR flow rate out of the intake manifold {dot over (m)}oe. However, during a transient cycle of the engine, for example when the engine load is increasing or decreasing during engine acceleration or deceleration, the EGR flow rate will be changing in response to a change in the throttle position. Generally, the rate of change of EGR mass in the intake manifold can be represented by equation (4) as follows:
This equation is defined by the EGR mass flow rate out of the intake manifold {dot over (m)}oe subtracted from the EGR mass flow rate into the intake manifold {dot over (m)}ie. Thus, during engine acceleration, the throttle is open, which results in an increase in the mass flow rate out of the intake manifold {dot over (m)}ot and, therefore, a higher EGR mass flow rate into the intake manifold {dot over (m)}ie. Alternatively, during engine deceleration, the throttle is closed, which effectively decreases the total mass flow rate out of the intake manifold {dot over (m)}ot leading to a lower EGR mass flow rate into the intake manifold {dot over (m)}ie.
Next, the rate of change of EGR mass in the intake manifold can further be represented in terms of desired EGR mass fraction Xde and actual EGR mass fraction Xce by substituting the foregoing equations (1) and (3) into equation (4) to derive the following equation:
where,
is the current rate of change of EGR mass in the intake manifold.
As discussed above, when the engine is operating in a transient state, for example when the engine is accelerating or decelerating, engine manufacturers typically design engines to increase or decrease EGR flow to maximize fuel consumption efficiency. For example, as shown in
Although the change in desired EGR flow rate EGR_des is almost instantaneous, in actual operation in conventional EGR systems, there is a substantial delay in the actual EGR flow rate EGR_act from reaching the maximum desired rate of 40 g/s. This delay is also shown in
It is further understood to those skilled in the art that during operation of conventional internal combustion engines, and specifically after the exhaust stroke of the combustion cycle, that residual gases (containing combustion products and nitrogen) generally remain in the cylinder. Residual gas affects the engine combustion processes (and therefore emissions and performance) through its influence on charge mass, temperature and dilution.
In conventional EGR systems, the amount of excess residual gas that collects in the cylinder during a transient cycle of engine operation often increases above stable limits for combustion. For example, as shown in
In one form, the present disclosure provides a system and method for controlling an exhaust gas recirculation valve during transient cycles of engine operation. More particularly, the method comprises determining a total mass flow rate out of the intake manifold and the current mass fraction of exhaust gas in the intake manifold, calculating a mass flow rate for exhaust gas into the intake manifold that is based on the flow rate of total mass out of the intake manifold and the current mass fraction of exhaust gas in the intake manifold, and actuating a control valve to a position based on the calculated mass flow rate for exhaust gas into the intake manifold. By implementing the foregoing, the control system and method is able to achieve an actual EGR flow rate during transient cycles of engine operation that closely resembles the desired EGR flow rate that the prior art EGR systems have failed to realize.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description and claims provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description, including disclosed embodiments and drawings, are merely exemplary in nature intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, its application or use. Thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
The control system and method disclosed herein are designed to improve EGR control during the transient cycle of engine operation by adjusting the EGR control valve based on the desired EGR flow rate EGR_des and the rate of change of EGR mass
As shown in
As shown in
The calculation for determining the desired EGR mass flow rate {dot over (m)}de of the current control system and method can be representing by the following equation:
where,
is the rate of change of EGR mass in the intake manifold; and
The EGR transient coefficient Ke (i.e., a calibration constant) is determined during development and calibration of the engine and is selected to tune how quickly or slowly the desired EGR flow rate should be met. It should be appreciated that the EGR transient coefficient Ke (which is a constant value) is only effective during transient cycles of engine operation because the EGR mass flow rate will be changing and, therefore, the rate of change of EGR mass
is a positive or negative value. Alternatively, in a steady state of engine operation, the current rate of change of EGR mass
will have a zero value and the EGR transient coefficient Ke will not affect the desired EGR mass flow rate {dot over (m)}de.
Furthermore, by substituting equation (5) into equation (6) for the desired required EGR mass flow rate {dot over (m)}de and solving the equation, it should be appreciated that the desired EGR mass flow rate {dot over (m)}de can also be represented by the following equation (7):
{dot over (m)}de={(Ke+1)·Xde−Ke·Xce}·{dot over (m)}ot|{dot over (m)}de≧0 (7)
Accordingly, based on the foregoing equations (6) or (7), the desired EGR mass flow rate {dot over (m)}de can be obtained during engine operation based on total mass flow rate out of the intake manifold {dot over (m)}ot and the current EGR mass fraction in the intake manifold Xce, which can be estimated by the vehicles computer or measured by a sensor in the intake manifold. As noted above, Xde is the desired EGR mass fraction in the intake manifold, which is predetermined by the engine manufacturer and is, for example, typically 15%, but can be between 0-40%. Moreover, Ke is an EGR transient coefficient (i.e., a calibration constant), preferably between a value of 0 and 1, but can be greater than 1 in certain embodiments.
Upon determining the desired EGR mass flow rate {dot over (m)}de, the EGR valve position can be determined by calculating the required EGR valve discharge coefficient area (CdA)egr of the EGR control valve opening necessary to obtain the desired EGR mass flow rate {dot over (m)}de. Specifically, applying equation (8) as follows, which determines the compressible flow through the EGR control valve to achieve the desired EGR mass flow rate, the product of the discharge coefficient and EGR flow area (CdA)egr can be determined:
where,
It should be appreciated that the processing components of the foregoing control system and method are performed by a conventional powertrain control module (“PCM”) or the like, which includes an engine control system that is specially programmed to control, inter alia, the EGR control valve according to the foregoing features and instructions and, more particularly, equations 6, 7 and/or 8. For example, the lookup table to determine the EGR valve position will be stored in the memory of the PCM and will be accessed during the transient engine cycles. Once the required EGR valve position is determined, the PCM will send appropriate electronic signals to the EGR control valve to actuate the valve to the desired position to obtain the desired EGR mass flow rate {dot over (m)}de. By implementing the foregoing, the control system and method disclosed herein achieves an actual EGR flow rate during transient cycles of engine operation that closely resembles the desired EGR flow rate that conventional EGR systems fail to realize. It should be generally understood that the mechanical features of the inventive EGR control system and method disclosed herein are the same or similar to the prior art systems, such as the EGR system depicted by the block diagram and
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5724950 | Shino et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5918582 | Itoyama et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6370935 | He et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6564784 | Onodera et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6742335 | Beck et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6802302 | Li et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6820600 | Sisken et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6868329 | Ito et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7784451 | Chi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8103427 | Osburn et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8571818 | Fontvieille | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8620499 | Tomatsuri et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20090132153 | Shutty et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20130226435 | Wasberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102007007945 | Aug 2008 | DE |
102007007945 | Aug 2008 | DE |
102013202640 | Aug 2013 | DE |
2872220 | Dec 2005 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 21, 2014 for International Application No, PCT/US2013/075679. |
John B. Heywood, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, Jan. 2, 1988, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, US, XP007922576, pp. 225-230-906-910, paragraph 6.3.2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140165976 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |