The disclosure relates to the field of internal combustion engines and more specifically to internal exhaust gas recirculation within such engines.
The use of internal exhaust gas recirculation (iEGR) is a known method for reducing the amount of pollutants in the exhaust gasses of internal combustion engines. iEGR can be achieved by either introducing exhaust gas into the induction manifold or by allowing exhaust gas to flow back from the exhaust manifold into the combustion chamber during the induction stroke. DE2125368 teaches the principle of an internal exhaust gas recirculation arrangement in which exhaust gas is fed back to the combustion chamber during the intake stroke. However, problems due to exhaust gas pressure pulsations within the exhaust manifold have led to unsatisfactory results in emission control strategies. The present disclosure is aimed at overcoming one or more of the problems as described.
In a first embodiment there is provided an internal combustion engine with a plurality of cylinders, each of the cylinders having a corresponding exhaust valve and the cylinders are divided into at least a first set and a second set. It furthermore includes an exhaust manifold, the exhaust manifold further having at least a first branch in direct fluid communication with the cylinders in the first cylinder set and a second branch being in direct fluid communication with the cylinders in the second cylinder set when the corresponding exhaust valves are in an open position.
There is also an internal exhaust gas recirculation arrangement, allowing at least part of the exhaust gas to flow from the exhaust manifold into the cylinders during at least part of an intake stroke of said cylinders, and a passage located in or proximal to the exhaust manifold for fluidly connecting the first branch and the second branch adapted to reduce the flow of exhaust gas from the exhaust manifold into the cylinders.
In a second embodiment there is provided a turbocharger for a multi-cylinder internal combustion engine. The internal combustion engine has a plurality of cylinders, each of the cylinders having a corresponding exhaust valve, and the cylinders are divided into sets. It further includes an exhaust manifold having at least two branches, each of the branches is in direct fluid connection with the cylinders in one of the cylinder sets when the corresponding exhaust valves are in an open position. There is also an internal exhaust gas recirculation arrangement, allowing at least part of the exhaust gasses to flow back from the exhaust manifold into the cylinders during an intake stroke of the cylinders. The turbocharger has an exhaust gas inlet, at least part of the exhaust gas inlet is adapted to maintain the gas flow separation from the cylinder sets, and a passage adapted to fluidly connect at least the at least two branches to reduce the back flow of exhaust gasses from the exhaust manifold into the cylinders. The passage is located in the exhaust gas inlet of the turbocharger.
The engine 10 has a plurality of cylinders 11 (
The exhaust manifold 30 as shown in detail in
Systems that maintain separate gas flows as described are common where the turbocharger 22 operates via a pulse wave method. This method relies on a compact flow of gas to ensure a quick responsive behavior of the turbocharger, the quick response relying on a separation of the various gas flows from the cylinder groups until proximal to the turbine of the turbocharger.
The sectional area of passage 40 may be controllable by a valve 42 as shown in
One of the cylinders 11 of the engine 10 is partially shown in
The internal combustion engine 10 uses the principle of iEGR via an iEGR arrangement 50 to improve emissions performance over a standard combustion process. iEGR can be achieved by either opening the intake valve 56 during the exhaust stroke of the piston 52 or by opening the exhaust valve 54 during the induction stroke of the piston. The principle used for this disclosure is the latter whereby during the induction stroke of the piston 52 part of the previously expelled exhaust gas is sucked back from the exhaust manifold 30 into the combustion chamber 53.
In conventional combustion cycles the exhaust valve 54 is opened mainly during the period wherein the piston 52 is performing its exhaust stroke. The period that the exhaust valve 54 is opened may not be identical to the period in which the piston is in the exhaust stroke, the valve opening period may be either shorter or longer, but is usually not much longer than the period of the exhaust stroke. Hence no, or an insignificant amount of, exhaust gas is sucked back into the combustion chamber 53.
In this particular iEGR system the exhaust valve 54 is open during at least part of the piston's 52 downward inlet stroke, so there is a substantial overlap in the periods that both the inlet 56 and exhaust valves are at least partially open. However, when the piston is approaching its top dead center (TDC) position, i.e., the end of the upward exhaust stroke, valve lifts must be reduced. One of the reasons for reducing valve lift is that if the exhaust valve is not recessed deeply into the cylinder head 14, the clearance between the piston at TDC and the exhaust valve may not be sufficient to avoid interference. The exhaust valve may even have to be closed completely to avoid clashing with the piston. In that case, the exhaust valve is reopened after the piston has passed its TDC position to allow at least some of the previously expulsed exhaust gas to flow back into the combustion chamber 53 when the piston continues its downward induction stroke.
Another variant uses a design that allows enough clearance between a partially opened exhaust valve 54 and the piston 52 at TDC, for example where the exhaust valve is recessed deeply into the cylinder head 14. The exhaust valve therefore does not have to be closed completely and so rather than reopening the exhaust valve, the exhaust valve follows a delayed closure pattern. The non-closure of the exhaust valve during the TDC position of the piston has the added benefit of gaining a better advantage of the pumping effect of the piston.
In addition to the various valve events and iEGR for controlling combustion, injection events are also crucial. Whereas traditionally one injection took place per cycle, nowadays it is common to have multiple injection events per cycle, e.g. split injections or pilot, pre- or post-injections in addition to a main injection. All these events influence the amount of exhaust gasses released at certain periods during a combustion cycle. Exhaust manifolds such as manifold 30 are designed to accommodate these exhaust gas pulses in a controllable manner so that the pulses do not interfere negatively with each other. However, interference problems may occur at several points in the speed range of an engine 10 as the manifold shape is a compromise to give an overall acceptable result across the operating range of the engine. A manifold with multiple branches that do not allow any fluid communication improves the pulsating action upon the turbine of the turbocharger and therefore the functioning of the turbocharger, but has the disadvantage that exhaust gas pressure pulses may cause the iEGR levels to be too high.
For example, emissions legislation may regulate the maximum level of emissions over certain engine speeds, e.g., 1400 rpm. With two manifold branches that do not allow any fluid communication until proximal to the turbocharger, iEGR is required above 1400 rpm to meet the emissions regulation. Even though control systems such as waste gates are available to improve turbocharger efficiency throughout the speed range, the efficiency is still likely to vary. Especially at low speeds the turbocharger is less likely to easily supply a sufficient quantity of combustible air for an optimized combustion process. If exhaust gasses would flow back into the combustion chamber, the combustion process would be even less optimal and problems such as power loss and visible smoke may occur. Therefore it would in this example be very beneficial to be able to reduce the amount iEGR at low engine speeds.
A passage such as passage 40 allows a control of the amount of iEGR by reducing exhaust gas pressure pulses via a pressure relief. Due to the nature of combustion cycles and the firing orders employed, the branches 32, 34 of the manifold 30 are out of synchronization with regards to pressure and pressure pulses.
This translates into a flux situation wherein the branches alternate in low and high pressures without being equal except at crossover points where the pressure simultaneously rises in one branch whilst falling in the other branch. The different pressures allow some gas to flow from the branch with the higher gas pressure to the branch with the lower gas pressure. Therefore the pressure peaks are absorbed which then obviously leads to less iEGR if the exhaust valve is open during the intake stroke.
If the passage is not variable or controllable, the passage is sized such that at all engine speeds the pressure relief from the first branch into the second branch and vice versa is performing to an overall acceptable level. However, more emphasis may be given to overcome a problem in a particular speed range such as the problem associated with low speed situations. If the passage is controllable it is likely that, to overcome the problems as indicated, the passage will be at a high degree of, or even maximum, opening at low engine speeds whilst it may be at a lower degree of, or minimum, opening at high engine speeds.
Of course, it is to be understood that engines, subsystems, and especially manifolds with different characteristics combined with different operational demands may dictate different passage control regime.
Although the preferred embodiments of this invention have been described herein, improvements and modifications may be incorporated without departing from the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04254978 | Aug 2004 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3591959 | Kubis | Jul 1971 | A |
3726084 | Meier et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3768248 | Grgurich et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3938330 | Nakajima et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3941113 | Baguelin | Mar 1976 | A |
4395884 | Price | Aug 1983 | A |
4458491 | Deutschmann | Jul 1984 | A |
4559784 | Jenny et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4714056 | Tottori et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4732116 | Tanahashi et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4732117 | Tanahashi et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4732118 | Tanahashi et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4800720 | Okada | Jan 1989 | A |
4813232 | Hitomi et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5134850 | Saito et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5406795 | Raub et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5406918 | Joko et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5517976 | Bächle et al. | May 1996 | A |
5603292 | Håkansson | Feb 1997 | A |
5682746 | von Hoerner | Nov 1997 | A |
5713200 | Baets et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5740671 | Jones | Apr 1998 | A |
5782226 | Gärtner | Jul 1998 | A |
6038860 | Bailey | Mar 2000 | A |
6089019 | Roby et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6257213 | Maeda | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263672 | Roby et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6308666 | Drecq | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325043 | Meistrick et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6439211 | Juretzka et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6662554 | Sheidler et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675572 | Everingham et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6772588 | Yamada et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6923149 | Nishimoto et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6932062 | Kuzuyama et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6932063 | Hu | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941905 | Hitomi et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
20030196646 | Shoyama et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
952778 | Aug 1974 | CA |
969827 | Jun 1975 | CA |
530 554 | Dec 1972 | CH |
360 704 | Oct 1973 | CH |
2 125 368 | Dec 1971 | DE |
1 406 002 | Apr 2004 | EP |
2 121 875 | Jan 1984 | GB |
2 253 881 | May 1991 | GB |
5113024 | Oct 1976 | JP |
61205331 | Sep 1986 | JP |
01024118 | Jan 1989 | JP |
06074038 | Mar 1994 | JP |
10089033 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10169513 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11093715 | Apr 1999 | JP |
WO 9107577 | May 1991 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060037592 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |