The field concerns internal combustion engines. In particular, the field relates to opposed-piston engines which may be applied to vehicles, vessels, and stationary power sources.
A two-stroke cycle engine is an internal combustion engine that completes a cycle of operation with a single complete rotation of a crankshaft and two strokes of a piston connected to the crankshaft. The strokes are typically denoted as compression and power strokes. One example of a two-stroke cycle engine is an opposed-piston engine in which two pistons are disposed in the bore of a cylinder for reciprocating movement in opposing directions along the central axis of the cylinder. Each piston moves between a bottom dead center (BDC) location where it is nearest one end of the cylinder and a top dead center (TDC) location where it is furthest from the one end. The cylinder has ports formed in the cylinder sidewall near respective BDC piston locations. Each of the opposed pistons controls one of the ports, opening the port as it moves to its BDC location, and closing the port as it moves from BDC toward its TDC location. One of the ports serves to admit charge air into the bore, the other provides passage for the products of combustion out of the bore; these are respectively termed “intake” and “exhaust” ports (in some descriptions, intake ports are referred to as “air” ports or “scavenge” ports). In a uniflow-scavenged opposed-piston engine, pressurized charge air enters a cylinder through its intake port as exhaust gas flows out of its exhaust port, thus gas flows through the cylinder in a single direction (“uniflow”) along the length of the cylinder, from intake port to exhaust port.
Charge air and exhaust products flow through the cylinder via an air handling system (also called a “gas exchange” system). Fuel is delivered by injection from a fuel delivery system. As the engine cycles, a control mechanization governs combustion by operating the air handling and fuel delivery systems in response to engine operating conditions. The air handling system may be equipped with an exhaust gas recirculation (“EGR”) system to reduce production of undesirable compounds during combustion.
In an opposed-piston engine, the air handling system moves fresh air into and transports combustion gases (exhaust) out of the engine, which requires pumping work. The pumping work may be done by a gas-turbine driven pump, such as a compressor (e.g., a turbocharger), and/or by a mechanically-driven pump, such as a supercharger. In some instances, the compressor unit of a turbocharger may be located upstream or downstream of a supercharger in a two-stage pumping configuration. The pumping arrangement (single stage, two-stage, or otherwise) can drive the scavenging process, which is critical to ensuring effective combustion, increasing the engine's indicated thermal efficiency, and extending the lives of engine components such as pistons, rings, and cylinders. Additionally, pressure and suction waves in the intake and exhaust can also provide pumping work. The pumping work also drives an exhaust gas recirculation system.
Opposed-piston engines have included various constructions designed to transport engine gasses (charge air, exhaust) into and out of the cylinders. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 1,517,634 describes an early opposed-piston aircraft engine that made use of a multi-pipe exhaust manifold having a pipe in communication with the exhaust area of each cylinder that merged with the pipes of the other cylinders into one exhaust pipe. The manifold was mounted to one side of the engine.
In the 1930s, the Jumo 205 family of opposed-piston aircraft engines defined a basic air handling architecture for dual-crankshaft opposed-piston engines. The Jumo engine included an inline cylinder block with six cylinders. The construction of the cylinder block included individual compartments for exhaust and intake ports. Manifolds and conduits constructed to serve the individualized ports were attached to or formed on the cylinder block. Thus, the engine was equipped with multi-pipe exhaust manifolds that bolted to opposite sides of the engine so as to place a respective pair of opposing pipes in communication with the annular exhaust area of each cylinder. The output pipe of each exhaust manifold was connected to a respective one of two entries to a turbine. The engine was also equipped with intake conduits located on opposing sides of the engine that channeled charge air to the individual intake areas of the cylinders. A two-stage pressure charging system provided pressurized charge air for the intake conduits.
The prior art exhaust manifolds extracted a penalty in increased engine size and weight. Each individual pipe required structural support in order to closely couple the pipe opening with the annular exhaust space of a cylinder. Typically, the support was in the form of a flange at the end of each pipe with an area sufficient to receive threaded fasteners for fastening the flange to a corresponding area on a side of the cylinder block. The flanges of each manifold were arranged row-wise in order to match the inline arrangement of the cylinders. The width of the ducts connected to these flanges restricted cylinder-to-cylinder spacing, which required the engine to be comparatively heavy and large.
In modern vehicle engines, size, weight and performance, both in terms of power and emissions, are factors that are balanced in designing engine components. It is desirable to minimize the engine space that receives exhaust from the cylinders after each combustion event so as to reduce size and weight and improve performance.
It is desirable to retain as much heat as possible in the exhaust gas discharged into the exhaust manifold in order to maximize the thermal energy extracted downstream for useful purposes such as driving a turbine and energizing after treatment devices (e.g., providing heat for catalysis). However, heat can be lost by conduction through the structures and surfaces of the exhaust manifold. Once received in the surrounding structure, heat is conducted from the cylinder block (i.e., engine block) by an engine cooling system in order to limit thermal stress on the cylinder block. Thermal energy lost in this way is said to be “rejected” to the coolant. Circulation of the coolant adds to parasitic engine losses. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce the transfer of heat from the exhaust gas to structures and surfaces of the exhaust manifold which surround the space into which the exhaust gas is expelled from the exhaust ports so as to enhance the thermal efficiency of the engine.
In some implementations an opposed-piston engine is provided with an exhaust manifold assembly construction that has one or more thermal barrier coatings. The exhaust manifold assembly can include an inside surface and the thermal barrier coating can be on the inside surface.
The following features can be present in the exhaust manifold assembly and/or in the engine in any suitable combination. The thermal barrier coating can include a thermally insulating material, and in some implementations, the thermally insulating material can have a low coefficient of thermal conductivity. The coating can include any of zirconia, alumina, a chrome-containing composition, a cobalt-containing composition, a nickel-containing composition, an yttrium-containing composition, and any combination thereof. The coating can be spray deposited or dip coating deposited onto the inside surface of the exhaust chest (i.e., exhaust manifold). In some implementations, the exhaust manifold assembly can include a metallic surface comprising a base material, and the base material can include gray iron and/or aluminum.
In a related aspect, a method of making an exhaust manifold assembly for a uniflow-scavenged, opposed-piston engine includes applying a coating of a material of low thermal conductivity to an inside surface of the exhaust manifold assembly. The following features can be present in the method in any suitable combination. The method can include preparing interior surface of the exhaust manifold assembly for application of the coating. Additionally, or alternatively, the method can include treating the exhaust manifold assembly after application of the coating.
In the figures,
An opposed-piston engine with an engine block having an exhaust manifold assembly and a thermal barrier coating on an inside surface of the exhaust manifold assembly is described. The thermal barrier coating, or coating layer, can serve to provide higher exhaust temperatures, reduce heat rejection to coolant in the engine, and allow for higher fatigue strength in the exhaust manifold and its structural features. Higher exhaust temperatures can improve an engine's fuel efficiency by increasing the exhaust enthalpy driving the engine's turbocharger. Additionally, or conversely, the higher exhaust temperatures can allow an engine's after-treatment system to light-off more quickly and maintain an operating temperature when the engine is operating at lower speeds or under lower loads. Also described herein are details of the coating, including methods for application of coating materials.
In
As the pistons 60 and 62 near TDC, a combustion chamber is defined in the bore 52 between the end surfaces 61 and 63 of the pistons. Fuel is injected directly into the combustion chamber through at least one fuel injector nozzle 100 positioned in an opening through the sidewall of a cylinder 50. The fuel mixes with charge air admitted into the bore through the intake port 56. As the air-fuel mixture is compressed between the end surfaces it reaches a temperature that causes combustion.
With further reference to
With further reference to
In some aspects, the air handling system shown in
The configuration shown in
Engine blocks, or alternately cylinder blocks, of opposed-piston engines can be constructed of various materials. However, for ease of manufacturing, as well as because of suitable mechanical properties over a wide range of temperatures, irons and steels have been the materials of choice for making engine blocks. Though the engine blocks, and thus the exhaust manifold assemblies, described herein are discussed as being of gray iron, other materials can be used, such as aluminum.
The fatigue strength of any metal used for the base metal of the exhaust manifold can vary as a function of temperature. For example, FIG. 10-2 of the Atlas of Fatigue Curves shows fatigue limit strength as a function of temperature for gray iron. At 600 deg. C., gray iron has fatigue limit strength of approximately 5 to 7.5 KSI (thousands of pounds per square inch). (Boyer, Howard E., “Atlas of Fatigue Curves,” ASM International; Materials Park, 1986, FIG. 10-2, Page. 246). Exhaust gas temperatures in opposed-piston engines, as described above, can range from 500 deg. C. to 700 deg. C. Coating layers (e.g., thermal barrier coatings) applied to the inside surface of a gray iron exhaust manifold can reduce the temperature experienced by the gray iron by 100 deg. C. to 350 deg. C. Effectively, the gray iron of an exhaust manifold with a barrier coating can have higher fatigue limit strengths with values between approximately 15 KSI to approximately 23 KSI.
In general, desirable thermal layer characteristics of the coating layer can include any of low thermal conductivity, thermal fatigue resistance, thermal shock resistance, high-temperature oxidation and corrosion resistance, the ability to radiate heat back to exhaust, and the ability to lower heat rejection outside of the exhaust manifold. The coating layer can include a thermally insulating material, which may be a low heat capacity material. At the interface 325, the base metal 310 can have a surface roughness that allows for good adhesion of the coating layer 320. Thus, the adhesion of the coating layer 320 on the base metal can have a value between 3000 and 5000 PSI (pounds per square inch) when tested using standard mechanical tests.
Materials for the coating layer can include any of a metal, a ceramic, a composite (e.g., cermet), a polymer, a densified material, and a porous material impregnated with polymer or ceramic. Exemplary ceramic materials can include alumina, zirconia, fosterite, mullite, yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ). Further, metals used for the coating material can include silicon, nickel, molybdenum, chromium, cobalt, yttrium, aluminum, and alloys thereof. Materials preparation methods for the coating can include any of spray deposition (e.g., plasma spray), electron beam physical vapor deposition (EB-PVD), slurry coating (spray and dip coating), electrolytic processes, and sol-gel processes.
Porosity of the material of the coating layer can be between 10-15 volume %. The coating layer can have a coefficient of thermal expansion (a) between 4 and 17×10−6 cm/(cm·K), such as between 7.5 and 10.5×10−6 cm/(cm·K). Another measurable characteristic is the thermal conductivity of a material. The coating layer can have a thermal conductivity value of between approximately 1 and 8 W/(m·K).
As described above, particularly with respect to the plot shown in Boyer, a coating layer (e.g., thermal barrier layer), may reduce the temperature experienced by the base metal of an exhaust manifold during operation of an engine, so that the temperature of the base metal (e.g., gray iron) is below about 450 or 500 degrees C. (Boyer, cited above). For gray iron, at temperatures of about 500 degrees C. and below, the fatigue limit is a factor of 2 or 3 of what it is at about 600 degrees C. This means that by maintaining the gray iron of the exhaust manifold below about 500 degrees C., the structural integrity of the manifold can be maintained for a greater amount of time than at the temperature of exhaust gas leaving the engine's cylinders (e.g., about 600 degrees C. or greater).
Similarly, the flow of coolant around and through an exhaust manifold while an engine operates may help maintain the temperature of the base metal below a threshold point (e.g., about 500 degrees C.) to help maintain the fatigue strength and structural robustness of the manifold. In exhaust manifold configurations with both passageways for conveying coolant and a thermal barrier coating, there may be even greater likelihood that the temperature of the base metal (e.g., gray iron) is maintained at or below a temperature that allows for optimal fatigue strength, and thus maintenance of the integrity of the exhaust manifold. Further, the presence of a thermal barrier coating (e.g., coating layer) in an exhaust manifold of an opposed-piston engine may reduce the cooling needs of the engine. A reduction in cooling needs may allow the cooling system to employ a smaller pump, thus reducing pumping loads, as well as allowing for a smaller grill and other parts of the cooling system.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the specific embodiments set forth in this specification are merely illustrative and that various modifications are possible and may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention which is defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of International Patent Application number PCT/US2018/045324, titled “Exhaust Manifold Constructions Including Thermal Barrier Coatings for Opposed-Piston Engines”, filed Aug. 6, 2018, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/547,364, titled “Exhaust Manifold Constructions Including Thermal Barrier Coatings for Opposed-Piston Engines,” filed Aug. 18, 2017. This application contains subject matter related to that of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/450,808, filed Aug. 4, 2014, “Exhaust Layout With Accompanying Firing Sequence For Two-Stroke Cycle, Inline, Opposed-Piston Engines,” now U.S. Pat. No. 10,001,057, issued Jun. 19, 2018; Ser. No. 14/284,058, filed May 21, 2014, “Air Handling Constructions for Opposed-Piston Engines,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,581,024, issued Feb. 28, 2017; and Ser. No. 14/284,134, filed May 21, 2014, “Open Intake and Exhaust Chamber Constructions for an Air Handling System of an Opposed-Piston Engine,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,551,220, issued Jan. 24, 2017.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62547364 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2018/045324 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 16783067 | US |