The present invention relates to an exhaust purification system of an internal combustion engine.
Known in the art is an internal combustion engine which arranges a hydrocarbon feed valve in an engine exhaust passage, which arranges an exhaust purification catalyst downstream of the hydrocarbon feed valve inside the engine exhaust passage, which carries precious metal catalysts on exhaust gas flow surfaces of the exhaust purification catalyst and is formed with basic exhaust gas flow surface parts around the precious metal catalysts, which injects hydrocarbons from the hydrocarbon feed valve by a predetermined period of within 5 seconds at the time of engine operation, and thereby removes the NOX which is contained in the exhaust gas (for example, see Patent Literature 1). In this internal combustion engine, even if the temperature of the exhaust purification catalyst becomes a high temperature, a high NOX purification rate can be obtained.
Patent Literature 1: WO2011/114499A1
In this internal combustion engine, even if the exhaust purification catalyst becomes high in temperature, a high NOX purification rate can be obtained, but obtaining a further higher NOX purification rate is desirable.
An object of the present invention is to provide an exhaust purification system of an internal combustion engine which enables a further high NOX purification rate to be obtained.
According to the present invention, there is provided an exhaust purification system of an internal combustion engine in which a hydrocarbon feed valve for feeding hydrocarbons is arranged in an engine exhaust passage, an exhaust purification catalyst for reacting NOx contained in an exhaust gas and reformed hydrocarbons is arranged in the engine exhaust passage downstream of the hydrocarbon feed valve, precious metal catalysts are carried on exhaust gas flow surfaces of the exhaust purification catalyst, basic exhaust gas flow surface parts are formed around the precious metal catalysts, the exhaust purification catalyst has a property of reducing the NOX which is contained in the exhaust gas if making a concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst vibrate by within a predetermined range of amplitude and by within a predetermined range of period and has a property of being increased in storage amount of NOX which is contained in the exhaust gas if making a vibration period of the hydrocarbon concentration longer than the predetermined range, and, at the time of engine operation, an amount of injection of hydrocarbons from the hydrocarbon feed valve is controlled so that an amplitude of change of concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst becomes within the above predetermined range of amplitude, and a period of injection of hydrocarbons from the hydrocarbon feed valve is controlled so that a concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst becomes within the predetermined range of period, wherein the exhaust purification catalyst is formed so that a deposition ability of hydrocarbons to a downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst becomes higher than a deposition ability of hydrocarbons to an upstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst.
When the temperature of the exhaust purification catalyst is low of course and even when it is high, an extremely high NOx purification rate can be obtained.
Referring to
On the other hand, the exhaust manifold 5 is connected to an inlet of an exhaust turbine 7b of the exhaust turbocharger 7. An outlet of the exhaust turbine 7b is connected through an exhaust pipe 12 to an inlet of an exhaust purification catalyst 13, while an outlet of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is connected to an inlet of a particulate filter 14 for trapping particulate which is contained in the exhaust gas. Upstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 inside the exhaust pipe 12, a hydrocarbon feed valve 15 is arranged for feeding hydrocarbons comprised of diesel oil or other fuel used as fuel for a compression ignition type internal combustion engine. In the embodiment shown in
On the other hand, the exhaust manifold 5 and the intake manifold 4 are connected with each other through an exhaust gas recirculation (hereinafter referred to as an “EGR”) passage 16. Inside the EGR passage 16, an electronically controlled EGR control valve 17 is arranged. Further, around the EGR passage 16, a cooling device 18 is arranged for cooling the EGR gas which flows through the inside of the EGR passage 16. In the embodiment which is shown in
An electronic control unit 30 is comprised of a digital computer provided with a ROM (read only memory) 32, a RAM (random access memory) 33, a CPU (microprocessor) 34, an input port 35, and an output port 36, which are connected with each other by a bidirectional bus 31. Downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, a temperature sensor 23 is arranged for detecting the temperature of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. The particulate filter 14 has a differential pressure sensor 24 attached to it for detecting the differential pressure before and after the particulate filter 14. The output signals of these temperature sensor 23, differential pressure sensor 24, and intake air amount detector 8 are input through respectively corresponding AD converters 37 to the input port 35. Further, an accelerator pedal 40 has a load sensor 41 connected to it which generates an output voltage proportional to the amount of depression L of the accelerator pedal 40. The output voltage of the load sensor 41 is input through a corresponding AD converter 37 to the input port 35. Furthermore, at the input port 35, a crank angle sensor 42 is connected which generates an output pulse every time a crankshaft rotates by, for example, 15°. On the other hand, the output port 36 is connected through corresponding drive circuits 38 to each fuel injector 3, the step motor for driving the throttle valve 10, hydrocarbon feed valve 15, EGR control valve 17, and fuel pump 21.
On the other hand, in
If hydrocarbons are injected from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15 into the exhaust gas, the hydrocarbons are reformed by the exhaust purification catalyst 13. In the present invention, at this time, the reformed hydrocarbons are used to remove the NOX at the exhaust purification catalyst 13.
Furthermore, it is learned that at this time, a large amount of reducing intermediates which contain nitrogen and hydrocarbons continues to be held or adsorbed on the surface of the basic layer 53, that is, on the basic exhaust gas flow surface parts 54 of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, and the reducing intermediates play a central role in obtaining a high NOX purification rate. Next, this will be explained with reference to
Now, as will be understood from
On the other hand, if hydrocarbons are fed from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15, the hydrocarbons successively deposit over the entire exhaust purification catalyst 13. The majority of the deposited hydrocarbons successively react with oxygen and are burned. Part of the deposited hydrocarbons are successively reformed and become radicalized inside of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 as shown in
Note that, at this time, the first produced reducing intermediate is considered to be a nitro compound R—NO2. If this nitro compound R—NO2 is produced, the result becomes a nitrile compound R—CN, but this nitrile compound R—CN can only survive for an instant in this state, so immediately becomes an isocyanate compound R—NCO. This isocyanate compound R—NCO becomes an amine compound R—NH2 if hydrolyzed. However, in this case, what is hydrolyzed is considered to be part of the isocyanate compound R—NCO. Therefore, as shown in
On the other hand, as shown in
In this way, in the exhaust purification catalyst 13, when the concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is made higher, reducing intermediates are produced, and after the concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is lowered, when the oxygen concentration is raised, the reducing intermediates react with the active NOX* or oxygen or break down on their own whereby the NOX is removed. That is, in order for the exhaust purification catalyst 13 to remove the NOX, the concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 has to be periodically changed.
Of course, in this case, it is necessary to raise the hydrocarbon concentration to a concentration sufficiently high for producing the reducing intermediates and it is necessary to lower the hydrocarbon concentration to a concentration sufficiently low for making the produced reducing intermediates react with the active NOX* or oxygen or break down on their own. That is, it is necessary to make the concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 vibrate by within a predetermined range of amplitude. Note that, in this case, it is necessary to hold these reducing intermediates on the basic layer 53, that is, the basic exhaust gas flow surface parts 54, until the produced reducing intermediates R—NCO and R—NH2 react with the active NOX* or oxygen or break down themselves. For this reason, the basic exhaust gas flow surface parts 54 are provided.
On the other hand, if lengthening the feed period of the hydrocarbons, the time until the oxygen concentration becomes higher becomes longer in the period after the hydrocarbons are fed until the hydrocarbons are next fed. Therefore, the active NOX* is absorbed in the basic layer 53 in the form of nitrates without producing reducing intermediates. To avoid this, it is necessary to make the concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 vibrate by within a predetermined range of period.
Therefore, in this embodiment of the present invention, to react the NOX contained in the exhaust gas and the reformed hydrocarbons and produce the reducing intermediates R—NCO and R—NH2 containing nitrogen and hydrocarbons, the precious metal catalysts 51 and 52 are carried on the exhaust gas flow surfaces of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. To hold the produced reducing intermediates R—NCO and R—NH2 inside the exhaust purification catalyst 13, the basic exhaust gas flow surface parts 54 are formed around the precious metal catalysts 51 and 52. The reducing intermediates R—NCO and R—NH2 which are held on the basic exhaust gas flow surface parts 54 are converted to N2, CO2, and H2O. The vibration period of the hydrocarbon concentration is made the vibration period required for continuation of the production of the reducing intermediates R—NCO and R—NH2. Incidentally, in the example shown in
If the vibration period of the hydrocarbon concentration, that is, the feed period of the hydrocarbons HC, is made longer than the above predetermined range of period, the reducing intermediates R—NCO and R—NH2 disappear from the surface of the basic layer 53. At this time, the active NOX* which is produced on the platinum Pt 53, as shown in
On the other hand,
Note that, at this time, sometimes the basic layer 53 temporarily adsorbs the NOX. Therefore, if using term of “storage” as a term including both “absorption” and “adsorption”, at this time, the basic layer 53 performs the role of an NOX storage agent for temporarily storing the NOX. That is, in this case, if the ratio of the air and fuel (hydrocarbons) which are supplied into the engine intake passage, combustion chambers 2, and upstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 in the exhaust passage is referred to as “the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas”, the exhaust purification catalyst 13 functions as an NOX storage catalyst which stores the NOX when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored NOX when the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas falls.
In this way, when the catalyst temperature TC becomes 400° C. or more, the NOX purification rate falls because if the catalyst temperature TC becomes 400° C. or more, the nitrates break down by heat and are released in the form of NOX from the exhaust purification catalyst 13. That is, so long as storing NOX in the form of nitrates, when the catalyst temperature TC is high, it is difficult to obtain a high NOX purification rate. However, in the new NOX purification method shown from
Therefore, in the present invention, a hydrocarbon feed valve 15 for feeding hydrocarbons is arranged in the engine exhaust passage, an exhaust purification catalyst 13 for reacting NOX contained in exhaust gas and reformed hydrocarbons is arranged in the engine exhaust passage downstream of the hydrocarbon feed valve 15, precious metal catalysts 51 and 52 are carried on the exhaust gas flow surfaces of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, basic exhaust gas flow surface parts 54 are formed around the precious metal catalysts 51 and 52, the exhaust purification catalyst 13 has the property of reducing the NOX which is contained in exhaust gas if the concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is made to vibrate by within a predetermined range of amplitude and within a predetermined range of period and has the property being increased in storage amount of NOX which is contained in exhaust gas if the vibration period of the hydrocarbon concentration is made longer than this predetermined range, and, at the time of engine operation, the concentration of hydrocarbons which flow into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is made to vibrate by within the predetermined range of amplitude and within the predetermined range of period to thereby reduce the NOX which is contained in the exhaust gas in the exhaust purification catalyst 13.
That is, the NOX purification method which is shown from
Next, referring to
Furthermore, in
In other words, in
In the example shown in
In this case, whether the demanded minimum air-fuel ratio X becomes rich or becomes lean depends on the oxidizing power of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. In this case, the exhaust purification catalyst 13, for example, becomes stronger in oxidizing power if increasing the carried amount of the precious metal 51 and becomes stronger in oxidizing power if strengthening the acidity. Therefore, the oxidizing power of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 changes due to the carried amount of the precious metal 51 or the strength of the acidity.
Now, if using an exhaust purification catalyst 13 with a strong oxidizing power, as shown in
On the other hand, when using an exhaust purification catalyst 13 with a weak oxidizing power, as shown in
That is, it is learned that the demanded minimum air-fuel ratio X, as shown in
Now, if the base air-fuel ratio (A/F)b becomes larger, that is, if the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas before the hydrocarbons are fed becomes higher, the feed amount of hydrocarbons required for making the air-fuel ratio (A/F)in the demanded minimum air-fuel ratio X or less increases and along with this the excess amount of hydrocarbons which do not contribute to the production of the reducing intermediates also increases. In this case, to remove the NOX well, as explained above, it is necessary to make the excess hydrocarbons oxidize. Therefore, to remove the NOX well, the larger the amount of excess hydrocarbons, the larger the amount of oxygen which is required.
In this case, if raising the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas, the amount of oxygen can be increased. Therefore, to remove the NOX well, when the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas before the hydrocarbons are fed is high, it is necessary to raise the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas after feeding the hydrocarbons. That is, the higher the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas before the hydrocarbons are fed, the larger the amplitude of the hydrocarbon concentration has to be made.
In this regard, the base air-fuel ratio (A/F)b becomes the lowest at the time of an acceleration operation. At this time, if the amplitude ΔH of the hydrocarbon concentration is about 200 ppm, it is possible to remove the NOX well. The base air-fuel ratio (A/F)b is normally larger than the time of acceleration operation. Therefore, as shown in
On the other hand, it is learned that when the base air-fuel ratio (A/F)b is the highest, if making the amplitude ΔH of the hydrocarbon concentration 10000 ppm or so, an excellent NOX purification rate is obtained. Therefore, in the present invention, the predetermined range of the amplitude of the hydrocarbon concentration is made 200 ppm to 10000 ppm.
Further, if the vibration period ΔT of the hydrocarbon concentration becomes longer, the time period where the oxygen concentration around the active NOX* becomes higher becomes longer in the time period after the hydrocarbons are fed to when the hydrocarbons are next fed. In this case, if the vibration period ΔT of the hydrocarbon concentration becomes longer than about 5 seconds, the active NOX* starts to be absorbed in the form of nitrates inside the basic layer 53. Therefore, as shown in
On the other hand, if the vibration period ΔT of the hydrocarbon concentration becomes about 0.3 second or less, the fed hydrocarbons start to build up on the exhaust gas flow surfaces of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, therefore, as shown in
Now then, in this embodiment according to the present invention, control is performed so as to change the injection amount and injection timing of hydrocarbons from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15 so that the amplitude ΔH and vibration period ΔT of the hydrocarbon concentration become the optimal values for the engine operating state. In this case, in this embodiment according to the present invention, the optimum hydrocarbon injection amount WT which is able to give the amplitude ΔH of this optimal hydrocarbon concentration is stored as a function of the injection amount Q from fuel injectors 3 and the engine speed N in the form of a map such as shown in
Next, referring to
In this second NOX purification method, as shown in
The stored NOX amount ΣNOX is, for example, calculated from the amount of NOX which is exhausted from the engine. In this embodiment according to the present invention, the exhausted NOX amount NOXA of NOX which is exhausted from the engine per unit time is stored as a function of the injection amount Q and engine speed N in the form of a map such as shown in
In this second NOX removal method, as shown in
Referring to
On the other hand, when it is judged at step 60 that TC<TC0, that is, when the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is not activated, the routine proceeds to step 62 where the NOX purification action by the second NOX purification method is performed. That is, at step 62, the amount NOXA of NOX exhausted per unit time is calculated from the map which is shown in
Now, as explained above, if using the first NOX purification method, even if the exhaust purification catalyst 13 becomes high in temperature, a high NOX purification rate can be obtained. The inventors engaged in repeated research regarding further raising the NOX purification rate when using the first NOX purification method and, as a result, found that the deposition ability of hydrocarbon molecules at the exhaust purification catalyst 13 has a great effect on improvement of the NOX purification rate. Therefore, first, this will be explained with reference to
As explained above, when the NOX purification action by the first NOX purification method is being performed, if hydrocarbons are fed from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15, the hydrocarbons successively deposit over the entire exhaust purification catalyst 13. The radical hydrocarbons which are produced at this time react with the active NOX* whereby the reducing intermediate is produced. This reducing intermediate deposits or is adsorbed at the surface of the basic layer 53. After this, if the hydrocarbons which are deposited around the reducing intermediate are made to oxidize and are consumed, and thereby the concentration of oxygen around the reducing intermediate rises, the reducing intermediate reacts with the active NOx* or oxygen or breaks down itself to become N2, CO2, and H2O, so the NOX is removed.
Now then, under the NOX purification action by the first NOX purification method, the NOX which is contained in the exhaust gas is held once in the form of a reducing intermediate on the exhaust purification catalyst 13 and then is removed. Therefore, to remove the NOX well, it is necessary to produce as much reducing intermediate as possible. In this case, the reducing intermediate is produced from the radical hydrocarbons, while the radical hydrocarbons are produced from the hydrocarbons which deposit on the exhaust purification catalyst 13, so to make the amount of production of the reducing intermediate increase, it is necessary to make as much hydrocarbons as possible deposit on the exhaust purification catalyst 13.
In this regard, the hydrocarbons which are fed from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15 are cracked if flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13. At this time, the number of carbon atoms of the hydrocarbon molecules becomes smaller and the number of hydrocarbon molecules increases. Such a cracking action of hydrocarbons is continued until the hydrocarbons flow through the inside of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, as shown in
Therefore, in the present invention, the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is formed so that the deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 becomes higher than the deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the upstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. In this case, as will be understood from
Next, referring to
First, explaining
That is, in the embodiment which is shown in
The upstream side catalyst 13a of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, as shown in
On the other hand, in the embodiment which is shown in
Compared with the straight flow type of upstream side catalyst 13a, the wall flow type of downstream side catalyst 13b is higher in deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, in this embodiment, the deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is made higher than the deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the upstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, the amount of deposition of hydrocarbons to the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases and, as a result, the amount of production of the reducing intermediate in the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases, so the NOX purification rate is raised. Note that in this embodiment, the downstream side catalyst 13b is used as a particulate filter. Therefore, in this embodiment, the particulate filter 14 which is shown in
In the embodiment which is shown in
In this embodiment as well, compared with a straight flow type of upstream side catalyst 13a, the pellet-shaped downstream side catalyst 13b is higher in deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, in this embodiment as well, the deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is made higher than the deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the upstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, the amount of deposition of hydrocarbons to the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases and, as a result, the amount of production of the reducing intermediate at the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases, so the NOX purification rate is raised.
In the embodiment which is shown in
In this embodiment, the exhaust flow structure of the upstream side catalyst 13a of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is a straight flow type where the exhaust gas flows through a plurality of exhaust flow passages 75 which extend along the axial line of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, while the exhaust flow structure of the downstream side catalyst 13b of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is also a straight flow type where the exhaust gas flows through a plurality of exhaust flow passages 76 which extend along the axial line of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. However, in this embodiment, as shown in
If in this way forming the cross-sectional area of the exhaust flow passages 76 of the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 smaller than the cross-sectional area of the exhaust flow passages 75 of the upstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, compared with the upstream side part, the downstream side part becomes higher in deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, the amount of deposition of hydrocarbons to the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases and, as a result, the amount of production of the reducing intermediate at the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases, so the NOX purification rate is raised.
As shown in
Compared with the case where the substrate of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is formed from a metal substrate, formation from a cordierite substrate, silicon carbide substrate, alumina-titanium substrate, or other ceramic substrate results in a higher deposition ability of hydrocarbons at the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, in this embodiment as well, the deposition ability of hydrocarbons at the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 becomes higher than the deposition ability of hydrocarbons at the upstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, the amount of deposition of hydrocarbons at the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases and, as a result, the amount of production of the reducing intermediate at the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases, so the NOX purification rate is raised.
That is, in the embodiment which is shown in
In this case, the substrate of the upstream side catalyst part 13a may also contain zeolite on it, but in this case, a larger amount of zeolite is contained on the substrate of the downstream side catalyst part 13b compared with the upstream side catalyst part 13a. Note that, in this embodiment as well, the substrates of the upstream side catalyst part 13a and the downstream side catalyst part 13b carry, for example, a catalyst carrier comprised of alumina. As shown in
In this way, in this embodiment, the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 contains a larger amount of zeolite compared with the upstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 or only the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 contains zeolite. As is well known, zeolite has the function of adsorbing and holding a large amount of hydrocarbons. Therefore, if, in this way, making the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 contain a larger amount of zeolite compared with the upstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 or making only the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 contain zeolite, the downstream side part becomes higher in deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the exhaust purification catalyst 13 compared with the upstream side part. Therefore, the amount of deposition of hydrocarbons at the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases and, as a result, the amount of production of the reducing intermediate at the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases, so the NOX purification rate is raised.
In the embodiment which is shown in
In this embodiment, the content of alumina is made to gradually increase from the upstream side toward the downstream side. That is, the content of alumina is made to gradually increase from the catalyst part 77a to the catalyst part 77b, catalyst part 77c, catalyst part 77d, and catalyst part 77e in that order. Therefore, in this embodiment, the downstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 contains a larger amount of alumina compared with the upstream side part of the exhaust purification catalyst 13.
If the content of alumina increases, the specific surface area of the catalyst carrier increases. Therefore, the greater the content of alumina, the higher the deposition ability of hydrocarbons at the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, in this embodiment, the downstream side part becomes higher in deposition ability of hydrocarbons to the exhaust purification catalyst 13 compared with the upstream side part. Therefore, in this embodiment as well, the amount of deposition of hydrocarbons at the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases and, as a result, the amount of production of the reducing intermediate at the exhaust purification catalyst 13 increases, so the NOX purification rate is raised.
Note that, as another embodiment, it is also possible to arrange an oxidation catalyst for reforming the hydrocarbons upstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 inside of the engine exhaust passage.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2011/075618 | 11/7/2011 | WO | 00 | 8/20/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/069088 | 5/16/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5052178 | Clerc et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057483 | Wan | Oct 1991 | A |
5075274 | Kiyohide et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5402641 | Katoh et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5882607 | Miyadera et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6109024 | Kinugasa et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6327851 | Bouchez et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6413483 | Brisley et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6477834 | Asanuma et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6667018 | Noda et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6813882 | Hepburn et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6854264 | Elwart et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6877311 | Uchida | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6983589 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7063642 | Hu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073325 | Nakatani et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082753 | Dalla Betta et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111456 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7137379 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146800 | Toshioka et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165393 | Betta et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7299625 | Uchida et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7332135 | Gandhi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7412823 | Reuter et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7454900 | Hayashi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7484504 | Kato et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506502 | Nakano et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7549284 | Iihoshi et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7703275 | Asanuma et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707821 | Legare | May 2010 | B1 |
7861516 | Allansson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8099950 | Kojima et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8215101 | Tsujimoto et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8261532 | Fukuda et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8281569 | Handa et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8434296 | Wada et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8572950 | Bisaiji et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8656706 | Umemoto et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8671667 | Bisaiji et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8679410 | Umemoto et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8689543 | Numata et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695325 | Bisaiji et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010052232 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020029564 | Roth et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030010020 | Taga et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040432 | Beall et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030101713 | Betta et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040045285 | Penetrante et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050037 | Betta et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055285 | Rohr et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040154288 | Okada et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175305 | Nakanishi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187477 | Okugawa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050135977 | Park et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147541 | Ajisaka et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060053778 | Asanuma et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060107657 | Bernler et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060153761 | Bandl-Konrad et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060286012 | Socha et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016357 | Nakagawa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028601 | Duvinage et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070059223 | Golunski et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070089403 | Pfeifer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070125073 | Reuter et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151232 | Dalla Betta et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080022662 | Yan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080053073 | Kalyanaraman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080102010 | Bruck et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120963 | Morita et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148711 | Takubo | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154476 | Takubo | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080196398 | Yan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223020 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080276602 | McCabe et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000277 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049824 | Kojima et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049825 | Ohashi | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049826 | Toshioka et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077948 | Mondori et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084091 | Tsujimoto et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118121 | Sarai | May 2009 | A1 |
20090120072 | Dalla Betta et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151332 | Toshioka et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090191108 | Blanchard et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196811 | Yamashita et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090229251 | Kadowaki | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249768 | Asanuma et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090266057 | Tsujimoto et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282809 | Toshioka | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288393 | Matsuno et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313970 | Iida | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005873 | Katoh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100055012 | Grisstede et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100107613 | Masuda et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115923 | Tsujimoto et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100126148 | Morishima et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132356 | Lee | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154387 | Shibata et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100233051 | Grisstede et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236224 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242459 | Tsujimoto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110041486 | Kato et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047984 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110047988 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110113754 | Kohara et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110120100 | Yin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131952 | Onodera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173950 | Wan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110209459 | Hancu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120122660 | Andersen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124967 | Yang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124971 | Bisaiji et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131908 | Bisaiji et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130000284 | Bisaiji et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130011302 | Bisaiji et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022512 | Bisaiji et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101454081 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101600860 | Dec 2009 | CN |
1 033 479 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 273 337 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 371 415 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1 519 015 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 710 407 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1 793 099 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1 911 506 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1 936 164 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1 965 048 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2 063 078 | May 2009 | EP |
2 149 684 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2 239 432 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2 460 989 | Jun 2012 | EP |
A-04-200637 | Jul 1992 | JP |
A-H08-117601 | May 1996 | JP |
A-09-004437 | Jan 1997 | JP |
A-09-220440 | Aug 1997 | JP |
A-11-30117 | Feb 1999 | JP |
A-11-062559 | Mar 1999 | JP |
A-11-081994 | Mar 1999 | JP |
A-2000-257419 | Sep 2000 | JP |
A-2002-188429 | Jul 2002 | JP |
A-2004-016850 | Jan 2004 | JP |
A-2004-36543 | Feb 2004 | JP |
A-2004-216224 | Aug 2004 | JP |
A-2004-290965 | Oct 2004 | JP |
A-2004-308526 | Nov 2004 | JP |
A-2004-316458 | Nov 2004 | JP |
A-2005-61340 | Mar 2005 | JP |
A-2005-113801 | Apr 2005 | JP |
A-2005-171853 | Jun 2005 | JP |
A-2005-177738 | Jul 2005 | JP |
A-2006-501390 | Jan 2006 | JP |
A-2006-512529 | Apr 2006 | JP |
A-2006-342700 | Dec 2006 | JP |
A-2007-064167 | Mar 2007 | JP |
A-2007-514090 | May 2007 | JP |
A-2007-514104 | May 2007 | JP |
A-2007-154794 | Jun 2007 | JP |
B2-3969450 | Sep 2007 | JP |
A-2007-278120 | Oct 2007 | JP |
A-2008-002451 | Jan 2008 | JP |
A-2008-19760 | Jan 2008 | JP |
A-2008-69769 | Mar 2008 | JP |
A-2008-231926 | Oct 2008 | JP |
A-2008-232003 | Oct 2008 | JP |
A-2008-255858 | Oct 2008 | JP |
A-2008-267178 | Nov 2008 | JP |
A-2008-267217 | Nov 2008 | JP |
A-2008-286186 | Nov 2008 | JP |
A-2008-543559 | Dec 2008 | JP |
A-2009-30560 | Feb 2009 | JP |
A-2009-112967 | May 2009 | JP |
A-2009-114879 | May 2009 | JP |
A-2009-156067 | Jul 2009 | JP |
A-2009-165922 | Jul 2009 | JP |
A-2009-167973 | Jul 2009 | JP |
A-2009-168031 | Jul 2009 | JP |
A-2009-191823 | Aug 2009 | JP |
A-2009-221939 | Oct 2009 | JP |
A-2009-226349 | Oct 2009 | JP |
A-2009-243362 | Oct 2009 | JP |
A-2009-275631 | Nov 2009 | JP |
A-2009-275666 | Nov 2009 | JP |
A-2010-012459 | Jan 2010 | JP |
A-2010-048134 | Mar 2010 | JP |
A-2011-190803 | Sep 2011 | JP |
B1-4868097 | Feb 2012 | JP |
WO 2005059324 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2006131825 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007026229 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007141638 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008007810 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008012653 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2009016822 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009056958 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009082035 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2011114499 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011114501 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011118044 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/075618 dated Dec. 27, 2011. |
Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/075618 dated Dec. 27, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/263,660, filed Oct. 7, 2011, in the name of Umemoto et al. |
Office Action dated May 2, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/263,660. |
Aug. 13, 2013 International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/053429 (with translation). |
Aug. 8, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/258,483. |
Feb. 6, 2014 Corrected Notice of Allowability issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694. |
Dec. 21, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/065449 (with translation). |
Jun. 15, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/054730 (with translation). |
Nov. 22, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/065186 (with translation). |
Jan. 18, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/067705. |
Jan. 18, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/JP2010/067707. |
Jan. 18, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/068785. |
Jul. 14, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,001. |
Jul. 14, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,884. |
Jun. 16, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/581,186. |
Jun. 18, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,909. |
Jun. 19, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,594. |
Jun. 21, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/059880 (with translation). |
Jun. 23, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,858. |
Jun. 29, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/055303 (with translation). |
Mar. 15, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/053429 (with translation). |
Mar. 22, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/073645 (with translation). |
Mar. 22, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/072299 (with translation). |
Mar. 8, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/052969 (with translation). |
May 15, 2013 Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694. |
May 17, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/057264. |
Mar. 28, 2014 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,862. |
Mar. 4, 2014 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,786. |
Nov. 13, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,692. |
Oct. 17, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694. |
Nov. 22, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/065187. |
Nov. 26, 2012 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694. |
Oct. 26, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/063135. |
Oct. 26, 2012 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,692. |
Oct. 23, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/263,272. |
Apr. 23, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/260,986. |
Apr. 3, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,574. |
Dec. 20, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,230. |
Jul. 1, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/257,789. |
Jul. 24, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,692. |
May 7, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,062. |
May 8, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/375,674. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,692 in the name of Umemoto et al., filed Sep. 20, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,733 in the name of Bisaui et al., filed Sep. 30, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/257,789 in the name of Nishioka et al., filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/258,483 in the name of Numata et al., filed Sep. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,574 in the name of Tsukamoto et al., filed Sep. 23, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,885 in the name of Umemoto et al., filed Sep. 23, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/260,986 in the name of W Atanabe et al., filed Sep. 29, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,858 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Oct. 4, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/263,272 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Oct. 6, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,062 in the name of Watanabe et al., filed Oct. 12, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,230 in the name of Bisadi et al., filed Oct. 13, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,594 in the name of Inoue et al., filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,884 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Oct. 17, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/375,674 in the name of Inoue et al., filed Dec. 1, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/578,148 in the name of Umemoto et al., filed Aug. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/58,186 in the name of Kazuhiro Umemoto et al., filed Aug. 24, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,862 in the name of Uenishi et al., filed Sep. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,909 in the name of Kazuhiro Umemoto et al., filed Sep. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Patent Application No. 131202,694 in the name of Bisaui et al., filed Sep. 19, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/108,113 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Dec. 16, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,629 in the name of Umemoto et al., filed Jan. 10, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,001 in the name of Inoue, et al., filed Oct. 19, 2011. |
Nov. 22, 2010 Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/065186 (with translation). |
Aug. 6, 2014 Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,574. |
Nov. 27, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/258,483. |
Oct. 4, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,885. |
Jun. 15, 2010 International Search Report issued in PCT/JP2010/0547-40 (with translation). |
Jun. 15, 2010 Written Opinion issued in PCT/JP2010/054740 (with translation). |
Jun. 20, 2012 Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 10845966.0. |
Jun. 15, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/JP2010/054731 (with translation). |
Jun. 29, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/056345. |
Apr. 4, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,710. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,774 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Sep. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,710 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Oct. 12, 2011. |
Oct. 24, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,710. |
Jan. 17, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,733. |
International Search Report dated Jun. 15, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/JP2010/054729. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/JP2011/066628 dated Sep. 13, 2011 (with Translation). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/502,210 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed on Apr. 16. 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/499,211 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Mar. 29, 2012. |
Jan. 22, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Application No. 13/499,211. |
May 27, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,710. |
Sep. 18, 2014 Notice of Allowance issued in Application No. 13/255,710,. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/934,080 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Jul. 2, 2013. |
Oct. 2, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,862. |
Jul. 9, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,774. |
Dec. 9, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,506. |
Dec. 27, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/502,210. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,506 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Sep. 30, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Oct. 13, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Sep. 19, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,733 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Sep. 30, 2011. |
Dec. 22, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,230. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130115138 A1 | May 2013 | US |