The present invention relates to an exhaust purification system of an internal combustion engine.
Known in the art is an internal combustion engine which arranges, in an engine exhaust passage, an NOx storage catalyst which stores NOx which is contained in exhaust gas when the air-fuel ratio of the inflowing exhaust gas is lean and which releases the stored NOx when the air-fuel ratio of the inflowing exhaust gas becomes rich, which arranges, in the engine exhaust passage upstream of the NOx storage catalyst, an oxidation catalyst which has an adsorption function, and which feeds hydrocarbons into the engine exhaust passage upstream of the oxidation catalyst to make the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the NOx storage catalyst rich when releasing NOx from the NOx storage catalyst (for example, see Patent Literature 1).
In this internal combustion engine, the hydrocarbons which are fed when releasing NOx from the NOx storage catalyst are made gaseous hydrocarbons at the oxidation catalyst, and the gaseous hydrocarbons are fed to the NOx storage catalyst. As a result, the NOx which is released from the NOx storage catalyst is reduced well.
However, there is the problem that when the NOx storage catalyst becomes a high temperature, the NOx purification rate falls.
An object of the present invention is to provide an exhaust purification system of an internal combustion engine which can obtain a high NOx purification rate even if the temperature of the exhaust purification catalyst becomes a high temperature.
According to the present invention, there is provided an exhaust purification system of an internal combustion engine in which an exhaust purification catalyst for reacting NOx contained in exhaust gas and reformed hydrocarbons is arranged inside of an engine exhaust passage, a precious metal catalyst is carried on an exhaust gas flow surface of the exhaust purification catalyst and a basic exhaust gas flow surface part is formed around the precious metal catalyst, the exhaust purification catalyst has a property of reducing the NOx which is contained in exhaust gas if the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst is made to vibrate within a predetermined range of amplitude and within a predetermined range of period and has a property of being increased in storage amount of NOx which is contained in exhaust gas if the vibration period of the hydrocarbon concentration is made longer than the predetermined range, at the time of engine operation, to reduce the NOx which is contained in exhaust gas at the exhaust purification catalyst, the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst is made to vibrate within the predetermined range of amplitude and within the predetermined range of period, at this time, the nitrogen-containing intermediate produced at the NOx reduction process is exhausted from the exhaust purification catalyst, and an intermediate purification catalyst for removal of the exhausted nitrogen-containing intermediate is provided downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst inside of the engine exhaust passage.
Even if the temperature of the exhaust purification catalyst becomes a high temperature, a high NOx purification rate can be obtained.
Referring to
On the other hand, the exhaust manifold 5 is connected to an inlet of an exhaust turbine 7b of the exhaust turbocharger 7. The outlet of the exhaust turbine 7b is connected through an exhaust pipe 12 to an inlet of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, and outlet of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is connected to an intermediate purification catalyst 14 for removing a nitrogen-containing intermediate which is exhausted from the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Inside the exhaust pipe 12 upstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, a hydrocarbon feed valve 15 is arranged for feeding hydrocarbons comprised of diesel oil or other fuel used as fuel for a compression ignition type internal combustion engine. In the embodiment shown in
On the other hand, the exhaust manifold 5 and the intake manifold 4 are connected with each other through an exhaust gas recirculation (hereinafter referred to as an “EGR”) passage 16. Inside the EGR passage 16, a electronically controlled EGR control valve 17 is arranged. Inside the EGR passage 16, an electronically controlled EGR control valve 17 is arranged. Further, around the EGR passage 16, a cooling device 18 is arranged for cooling EGR gas flowing through the inside of the EGR passage 16. In the embodiment shown in
An electronic control unit 30 is comprised of a digital computer provided with a ROM (read only memory) 32, a RAM (random access memory) 33, a CPU (microprocessor) 34, an input port 35, and an output port 36, which are connected with each other by a bidirectional bus 31. Downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, a temperature sensor 23 for detecting an exhaust gas temperature is attached. The output signals of this temperature sensor 23 and intake air amount detector 8 are input through respectively corresponding AD converters 37 to the input port 35. Further, an accelerator pedal 40 has a load sensor 41 connected to it which generates an output voltage proportional to the amount of depression L of the accelerator pedal 40. The output voltage of the load sensor 41 is input through a corresponding AD converter 37 to the input port 35. Furthermore, at the input port 35, a crank angle sensor 42 is connected which generates an output pulse every time a crankshaft rotates by, for example, 15°. On the other hand, the output port 36 is connected through corresponding drive circuits 38 to each fuel injector 3, step motor for driving the throttle valve 10, hydrocarbon feed valve 15, EGR control valve 17, and fuel pump 21.
On the other hand, in
If hydrocarbons are injected from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15 into the exhaust gas, the hydrocarbons are reformed by the exhaust purification catalyst 13. In the present invention, at this time, the reformed hydrocarbons are used to remove the NOx at the exhaust purification catalyst 13.
Note that, even if the fuel injector 3 injects fuel, that is, hydrocarbons, into the combustion chamber 2 in the second half of the expansion stroke or exhaust stroke, the hydrocarbons are reformed in the combustion chamber 2 or exhaust purification catalyst 13, and the NOx which is contained in exhaust gas is removed by the reformed hydrocarbons in the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, in the present invention, instead of feeding hydrocarbons from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15 to the inside of an engine exhaust passage, it is also possible to feed hydrocarbons into the combustion chamber 2 in the second half of the expansion stroke or exhaust stroke. In this way, in the present invention, it is possible to feed hydrocarbons into a combustion chamber 2, but below, the present invention will be explained with reference to the case of trying to inject hydrocarbons from a hydrocarbon feed valve 15 to the inside of an engine exhaust passage
Furthermore, at this time, a large amount of reducing intermediate containing nitrogen and hydrocarbons continues to be held or adsorbed on the surface of the basic layer 53, that is, on the basic exhaust gas flow surface part 54 of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. It is learned that this reducing intermediate plays a central role in obtaining a high NOx purification rate. Next, this will be explained with reference to
Now, as will be understood from
On the other hand, if hydrocarbons are fed from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15, as shown in
Note that, at this time, the first produced reducing intermediate is considered to be a nitro compound R—NO2. If this nitro compound R—NO2 is produced, the result becomes a nitrile compound R—CN, but this nitrile compound R—ON can only survive for an instant in this state, so immediately becomes an isocyanate compound R—NCO. If this isocyanate compound R—NCO is hydrolyzed, it becomes an amino compound R—NH2. If this isocyanate compound R—NCO. However, in this case, what is hydrolyzed is considered to be part of the isocyanate compound R—NCO. Therefore, as shown in
On the other hand, as shown in
In this way, in the exhaust purification catalyst 13, by making the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 higher, a reducing intermediate is produced. By making the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 lower and raising the oxygen concentration, the active NO2* reacts with the reducing intermediate and the NOx is removed. That is, in order for the exhaust purification catalyst 13 to remove the NOx, the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 has to be periodically changed.
Of course, in this case, it is necessary to raise the concentration of hydrocarbons to a concentration sufficiently high for producing the reducing intermediate and it is necessary to lower the concentration of hydrocarbons to a concentration sufficiently low for making the produced reducing intermediate react with the active NO2*. That is, the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 has to be made to vibrate within a predetermined range of amplitude. Note that, in this case, a sufficient amount of reducing intermediate R—NCO or R—NH2 has to be held on the basic layer 53, that is, on the basic exhaust gas flow surface part 24, until the produced reducing intermediate reacts with the active NO2*. For this reason, the basic exhaust gas flow surface part 24 is provided.
On the other hand, if lengthening the feed period of the hydrocarbons, the time in which the oxygen concentration becomes higher becomes longer in the period after the hydrocarbons are fed until the hydrocarbons are next fed. Therefore, the active NO2* is absorbed in the basic layer 53 in the form of nitrates without producing a reducing intermediate. To avoid this, it is necessary to make the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 vibrate by within a predetermined range of period.
Therefore, in an embodiment of the present invention, to make the NOx contained in the exhaust gas and the reformed hydrocarbons react and produce the reducing intermediate R—NCO or R—NH2 containing nitrogen and hydrocarbons, precious metal catalysts 51 and 52 are carried on the exhaust gas flow surface of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. To hold the produced reducing intermediate R—NCO or R—NH2 inside the exhaust purification catalyst 13, a basic exhaust gas flow surface part 54 is formed around the precious metal catalysts 51 and 52. The vibration period of the hydrocarbon concentration is made the vibration period required for continuation of the production of the reducing intermediate R—NCO or R—NH2. Incidentally, in the example shown in
If the vibration period of the hydrocarbon concentration, that is, the feed period of the hydrocarbons HC, is made longer than the above predetermined range of period, the reducing intermediate R—NCO or R—NH2 disappears from the surface of the basic layer 53. At this time, the active NO2* which was produced on the platinum Pt 53, as shown in
On the other hand,
Note that, at this time, sometimes the basic layer 53 temporarily adsorbs the NOx. Therefore, if using term of storage as a term including both absorption and adsorption, at this time, the basic layer 53 performs the role of an NOx storage agent for temporarily storing the NOx. That is, in this case, the ratio of the air and fuel (hydrocarbons) which are supplied into the engine intake passage, combustion chambers 2, and exhaust passage upstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 called the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas, the exhaust purification catalyst 13 functions as an NOx storage catalyst which stores the NOx when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored NOx when the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas falls.
In this way, when the catalyst temperature TC becomes 400° C. or more, the NOx purification rate falls because if the catalyst temperature TC becomes 400° C. or more, the nitrates break down by heat and are released in the form of NO2 from the exhaust purification catalyst 13. That is, so long as storing NOx in the form of nitrates, when the catalyst temperature TC is high, it is difficult to obtain a high NOx purification rate. However, in the new NOx purification method shown from
Therefore, in the present invention, an exhaust purification catalyst 13 for reacting NOx contained in exhaust gas and reformed hydrocarbons is arranged inside of an engine exhaust passage, precious metal catalysts 51 and 52 are carried on the exhaust gas flow surface of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, around the precious metal catalysts 51 and 52, a basic exhaust gas flow surface part 54 is formed, the exhaust purification catalyst 13 has the property of reducing the NOx which is contained in exhaust gas if the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is made to vibrate within a predetermined range of amplitude and within a predetermined range of period and has the property of being increased in storage amount of NOx which is contained in exhaust gas if the vibration period of the hydrocarbon concentration is made longer than this predetermined range, and, at the time of engine operation, the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is made to vibrate by within the predetermined range of amplitude and within the predetermined range of period to thereby reduce the NOx which is contained in the exhaust gas in the exhaust purification catalyst 13.
That is, the NOx purification method which is shown from
Next, referring to
Furthermore, in
In other words, in
In the example shown in
In this case, whether the demanded minimum air-fuel ratio X becomes rich or becomes lean depends on the oxidizing strength of the exhaust purification catalyst 13. In this case, the exhaust purification catalyst 13, for example, becomes stronger in oxidizing strength if increasing the carried amount of the precious metal 51 and becomes stronger in oxidizing strength if strengthening the acidity. Therefore, the oxidizing strength of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 changes due to the carried amount of the precious metal 51 or the strength of the acidity.
Now, if using an exhaust purification catalyst 13 with a strong oxidizing strength, as shown in
On the other hand, when using an exhaust purification catalyst 13 with a weak oxidizing strength, as shown in
That is, it is learned that the demanded minimum air-fuel ratio X, as shown in
Now, if the base air-fuel ratio (A/F)b becomes larger, that is, if the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas before the hydrocarbons are fed becomes higher, the feed amount of hydrocarbons required for making the air-fuel ratio (A/F)in the demanded minimum air-fuel ratio X or less increases and along with this the excess amount of hydrocarbons which did not contribute the production of the reducing intermediate also increases. In this case, to remove the NOx well, as explained above, it is necessary to make the excess hydrocarbons oxidize. Therefore, to remove the NOx well, the larger the amount of excess hydrocarbons, the larger the amount of oxygen which is required.
In this case, if raising the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas, the amount of oxygen can be increased. Therefore, to remove the NOx well, when the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas before the hydrocarbons are fed is high, it is necessary to raise the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas after feeding the hydrocarbons. That is, the higher the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas before the hydrocarbons are fed, the larger the amplitude of the hydrocarbon concentration has to be made.
In this regard, the base air-fuel ratio (A/F)b becomes the lowest at the time of an acceleration operation. At this time, if the amplitude ΔH of the hydrocarbon concentration is about 200 ppm, it is possible to remove the NOx well. The base air-fuel ratio (A/F)b is normally larger than the time of acceleration operation. Therefore, as shown in
On the other hand, it is learned that when the base air-fuel ratio (A/F)b is the highest, if making the amplitude ΔH of the hydrocarbon concentration 10000 ppm or so, an excellent NOx purification rate is obtained. Therefore, in the present invention, the predetermined range of the amplitude of the hydrocarbon concentration is made 200 ppm to 10000 ppm.
Further, if the vibration period ΔT of the hydrocarbon concentration becomes longer, the oxygen concentration around the active NO2* becomes higher in the time after the hydrocarbons are fed to when the hydrocarbons are next fed. In this case, if the vibration period ΔT of the hydrocarbon concentration becomes longer than about 5 seconds, the active NO2* starts to be absorbed in the form of nitrates inside the basic layer 53. Therefore, as shown in
On the other hand, if the vibration period ΔT of the hydrocarbon concentration becomes about 0.3 second or less, the fed hydrocarbons start to build up on the exhaust gas flow surface of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, therefore, as shown in
Now, in the present invention, the hydrocarbon feed amount and injection timing from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15 are made to change so as to control the amplitude ΔH and vibration period ΔT of the hydrocarbons concentration to become the optimum values in accordance with the engine operating state. In this case, in this embodiment of the present invention, the hydrocarbon feed amount W able to give the optimum amplitude ΔH of the hydrocarbon concentration is stored as a function of the injection amount Q from the fuel injector 3 and engine speed N in the form of a map such as shown in
Next, referring to
In this second NOx purification method, as shown in
The stored NOx amount ΣNOX is, for example, calculated from the amount of NOx which is exhausted from the engine. In this embodiment according to the present invention, the exhausted NOx amount NOXA of NOx which is exhausted from the engine per unit time is stored as a function of the injection amount Q and engine speed N in the form of a map such as shown in
In this second NOx purification method, as shown in
In this regard, to remove NOx by using the first NOx purification method, even when the NOx concentration in the exhaust gas is low, at least a certain amount of hydrocarbons has to be fed in a short period. Therefore, when the NOx concentration of the exhaust gas is low, the NOx purification efficiency becomes poor. As opposed to this, in the second NOx purification method, when the NOx concentration in the exhaust gas is low, the time until the stored NOx amount ΣNOX reaches the allowable value MAX becomes longer, so the period for making the air-fuel ratio (A/F)in of the exhaust gas rich just becomes longer. Accordingly, the NOx purification efficiency does not particularly become worse. Therefore, when the NOx concentration in the exhaust gas is low, use of the second NOx purification method rather than the first NOx purification method can be said to be preferable. That is, which of the first NOx purification method and second NOx purification method should be used changes in the engine operating state.
Now, as explained before, when using the first NOx purification method for the NOx purification action, as shown in
In this regard, the nitrogen-containing intermediate which is exhausted from the exhaust purification catalyst 13 changes to NOx in the gas phase, and if a catalyst which has an oxidation function is arranged downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, the nitrogen-containing intermediate which is exhausted from the exhaust purification catalyst 13 changes to NOx on this catalyst. Further, even when the reducing intermediate is exhausted as it is from the exhaust purification catalyst 13, this reducing intermediate changes to NOx in the gas phase or on the catalyst. As a result, the NOx purification rate ends up falling.
That is, in the exhaust purification system according to the present invention, at the time of engine operation, to reduce the NOx which is contained in exhaust gas at the exhaust purification catalyst 13, if making the concentration of hydrocarbons flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 vibrate by within a predetermined range of amplitude ΔH and within a predetermined range of period ΔT, the nitrogen-containing intermediate which is produced at the NOx reduction process is exhausted from the exhaust purification catalyst 13. Therefore, in the present invention, at this time, an intermediate purification catalyst 14 for removal of the exhausted nitrogen-containing intermediate is provided downstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13 inside of the engine exhaust passage.
In this embodiment according to the present invention, the catalyst carrier 60 of the intermediate purification catalyst 14 is comprised of alumina or zeolite, while the metal 61 which is carried on this catalyst carrier 60 is comprised of at least one transition metal selected from silver Ag, copper Cu, iron Fe, vanadium V, molybdenum Mo, cobalt Co, nickel Ni, and manganese Mn.
As shown in
Note that, if strengthening the oxidizing ability of the metal 61, the reducing intermediate or nitrogen-containing intermediate ends up being converted to NOx. To prevent these intermediates from being converted to NOx in this way, as the metal 61, as explained before, a metal with an oxidizing ability lower than a precious metal is used.
On the other hand, when making the catalyst carrier 60 of the intermediate purification catalyst 14 zeolite, in addition to the nitrogen-containing intermediate, the hydrogen sulfide H2S which is exhausted from the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is removed at the intermediate purification catalyst 14. Furthermore, in this case, the ammonia NH3 which is exhausted from the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is adsorbed at the intermediate purification catalyst 14. This adsorbed ammonia NH3 is used to reduce the NOx which flows out from the exhaust purification catalyst 13.
Referring to
Next, at step 82, it is judged if the NOx purification efficiency F1 is higher than the NOx purification efficiency F2. When F1≧F2, it is judged that the first NOx purification method should be used. At this time, the routine proceeds to step 83. At step 83, the feed control of hydrocarbons from the hydrocarbon feed valve 15 is performed. At this time, the NOx purification action by the first NOx purification method is performed.
As opposed to this, when it is judged at step 80 that TC<TX or when it is judged at step 82 that F1<F2, it is judged that the second NOx purification method should be used and the routine proceeds to step 84. At step 84, the NOx amount NOXA of NOx exhausted per unit time is calculated from the map shown in
Note that the radicalization action of hydrocarbons shown in
Next, an embodiment which gives the intermediate purification catalyst 14 an NOx adsorption function will be explained.
On the other hand, if making the alumina carry silver Ag, as shown in
In this embodiment, the reducing intermediate or nitrogen-containing intermediate is removed at the upstream-side part 14a, while the NOx which could not be removed is adsorbed at the downstream-side part 14b. The NOx which is adsorbed at the downstream-side part 14b is removed at the reducing catalyst 62 when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the exhaust purification catalyst 13 is made rich.
That is, in the embodiment shown in
As opposed to this, in the embodiment shown in
In this embodiment, as shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In this embodiment as well, alumina is used as the catalyst carrier 60 of the intermediate purification catalyst 14 and silver Ag is used as the metal 61. The carried amount of silver Ag is made 2 wt % to 5 wt %.
Note that, as another embodiment, in the engine exhaust passage upstream of the exhaust purification catalyst 13, an oxidation catalyst for reforming the hydrocarbons can be arranged.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2010/065187 | 8/30/2010 | WO | 00 | 10/4/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/029188 | 3/8/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5052178 | Clerc et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057483 | Wan | Oct 1991 | A |
5075274 | Kiyohide et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5402641 | Katoh et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5882607 | Miyadera et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6109024 | Kinugasa et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6327851 | Bouchez et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6413483 | Brisley et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6477834 | Asanuma et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6667018 | Noda et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6813882 | Hepburn et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6854264 | Elwart et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6877311 | Uchida | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6983589 | Lewis, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7063642 | Hu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073325 | Nakatani et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082753 | Dalla Betta et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111456 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7137379 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146800 | Toshioka et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165393 | Betta et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7299625 | Uchida et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7332135 | Gandhi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7412823 | Reuter et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7454900 | Hayashi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7484504 | Kato et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506502 | Nakano et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7549284 | Iihoshi et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7703275 | Asanuma et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707821 | Legare | May 2010 | B1 |
7861516 | Allansson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8099950 | Kojima et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8215101 | Tsujimoto et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8261532 | Fukuda et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8281569 | Handa et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8434296 | Wada et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8572950 | Bisaiji et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8656706 | Umemoto et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8671667 | Bisaiji et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8679410 | Umemoto et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8689543 | Numata et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695325 | Bisaiji et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010052232 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020029564 | Roth et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020053202 | Akama et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030010020 | Taga et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040432 | Beall et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030101713 | Dalla Betta et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040045285 | Penetrante et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050037 | Betta et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055285 | Rohr et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040154288 | Okada et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175305 | Nakanishi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187477 | Okugawa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050135977 | Park et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147541 | Ajisaka et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060053778 | Asanuma et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060107657 | Bernler et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060153761 | Bandl-Konrad et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060286012 | Socha et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016357 | Nakagawa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028601 | Duvinage et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070059223 | Golunski et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070089403 | Pfeifer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070125073 | Reuter et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151232 | Dalla Betta et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080022662 | Yan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080053073 | Kalyanaraman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080102010 | Bruck et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120963 | Morita et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148711 | Takubo | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154476 | Takubo | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080196398 | Yan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223020 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080276602 | McCabe et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000277 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049824 | Kojima et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049825 | Ohashi | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049826 | Toshioka et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077948 | Mondori et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084091 | Tsujimoto et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118121 | Sarai | May 2009 | A1 |
20090120072 | Dalla Betta et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151332 | Toshioka et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090191108 | Blanchard et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196811 | Yamashita et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090229251 | Kadowaki | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249768 | Asanuma et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090266057 | Tsujimoto et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282809 | Toshioka | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288393 | Matsuno et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313970 | Iida | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005873 | Katoh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100055012 | Grisstede et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100107613 | Masuda et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115923 | Tsujimoto et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100126148 | Morishima et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132356 | Lee | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154387 | Shibata et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100233051 | Grisstede et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236224 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242459 | Tsujimoto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110041486 | Kato et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047984 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110047988 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110113754 | Kohara et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110120100 | Yin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131952 | Onodera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173950 | Wan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110209459 | Hancu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120122660 | Andersen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124967 | Yang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124971 | Bisaiji et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131908 | Bisaiji et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130000284 | Bisaiji et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130011302 | Bisaiji et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022512 | Bisaiji et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101454081 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101600860 | Dec 2009 | CN |
1 033 479 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 273 337 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 371 415 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1 519 015 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1544429 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1 710 407 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1 793 099 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1 911 506 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1 936 164 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1 965 048 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2 063 078 | May 2009 | EP |
2 149 684 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2 239 432 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2 460 989 | Jun 2012 | EP |
A-04-200637 | Jul 1992 | JP |
A-H08-117601 | May 1996 | JP |
A-09-004437 | Jan 1997 | JP |
A-09-220440 | Aug 1997 | JP |
A-11-30117 | Feb 1999 | JP |
A-11-062559 | Mar 1999 | JP |
A-11-081994 | Mar 1999 | JP |
A-2000-257419 | Sep 2000 | JP |
A-2002-188429 | Jul 2002 | JP |
A-2004-016850 | Jan 2004 | JP |
A-2004-36543 | Feb 2004 | JP |
A-2004-216224 | Aug 2004 | JP |
A-2004-290965 | Oct 2004 | JP |
A-2004-308526 | Nov 2004 | JP |
A-2004-316458 | Nov 2004 | JP |
A-2005-61340 | Mar 2005 | JP |
A-2005-113801 | Apr 2005 | JP |
A-2005-171853 | Jun 2005 | JP |
A-2005-177738 | Jul 2005 | JP |
A-2006-501390 | Jan 2006 | JP |
A-2006-512529 | Apr 2006 | JP |
A-2006-342700 | Dec 2006 | JP |
A-2007-64167 | Mar 2007 | JP |
A-2007-514090 | May 2007 | JP |
A-2007-514104 | May 2007 | JP |
A-2007-154794 | Jun 2007 | JP |
B2-3969450 | Sep 2007 | JP |
A-2007-278120 | Oct 2007 | JP |
A-2008-002451 | Jan 2008 | JP |
A-2008-19760 | Jan 2008 | JP |
A-2008-69769 | Mar 2008 | JP |
A-2008-231926 | Oct 2008 | JP |
A-2008-232003 | Oct 2008 | JP |
A-2008-255858 | Oct 2008 | JP |
A-2008-267178 | Nov 2008 | JP |
A-2008-267217 | Nov 2008 | JP |
A-2008-286186 | Nov 2008 | JP |
A-2008-543559 | Dec 2008 | JP |
A-2009-30560 | Feb 2009 | JP |
A-2009-112967 | May 2009 | JP |
A-2009-114879 | May 2009 | JP |
A-2009-156067 | Jul 2009 | JP |
A-2009-165922 | Jul 2009 | JP |
A-2009-167973 | Jul 2009 | JP |
A-2009-168031 | Jul 2009 | JP |
A-2009-191823 | Aug 2009 | JP |
A-2009-221939 | Oct 2009 | JP |
A-2009-226349 | Oct 2009 | JP |
A-2009-243362 | Oct 2009 | JP |
A-2009-275631 | Nov 2009 | JP |
A-2009-275666 | Nov 2009 | JP |
A-2010-012459 | Jan 2010 | JP |
A-2010-048134 | Mar 2010 | JP |
A-2011-190803 | Sep 2011 | JP |
B1-4868097 | Feb 2012 | JP |
WO 2005059324 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2006131825 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007026229 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007141638 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008007810 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008012653 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2009016822 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009056958 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009082035 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2011114499 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011114501 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011118044 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,692. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,733, filed Sep. 30, 2011 in the name of Bisaiji et al. |
Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,230. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Feb. 6, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694. |
May 15, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694. |
Nov. 22, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/065187. |
International Search Report dated Jun. 15, 2010 issued in PCT/JP2010/054730 (with translation). |
Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/JP2010/065186 mailed Nov. 22, 2010 (with translation). |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/JP2010/065186 mailed Nov. 22, 2010 (with translation). |
Mar. 15, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/JP2011/053429. |
Oct. 26, 2012 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,692. |
Nov. 26, 2012 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Sep. 19, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,692 in the name of Umemoto et al., filed Sep. 20, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,230 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Oct. 13, 2011. |
Aug. 13, 2013 International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/053429 (with translation). |
Aug. 8, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/258,483. |
Dec. 21, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/065449 (with translation). |
Dec. 27, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/075618 (with translation). |
Jan. 18, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/067705. |
Jan. 18, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/JP2010/067707. |
Jan. 18, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/068785. |
Jul. 14, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,001. |
Jul. 14, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,884. |
Jun. 16, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/581,186. |
Jun. 18, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,909. |
Jun. 19, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,594. |
Jun. 21, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/059880 (with translation). |
Jun. 26, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/580,000. |
Jun. 29, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/055303 (with translation). |
Mar. 22, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/073645 (with translation). |
Mar. 22, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/072299 (with translation). |
Mar. 8, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/052969 (with translation). |
May 17, 2011 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/057264 (with translation). |
May 2, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/263,660. |
Mar. 28, 2014 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,862. |
Mar. 4, 2014 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,786. |
Nov. 13, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,692. |
Oct. 17, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,694. |
Oct. 26, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/063135. |
Oct. 23, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/263,272. |
Apr. 23, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/260,986. |
Apr. 3, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,574. |
Jul. 1, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/257,789. |
May 7, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,062. |
May 8, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/375,674. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/257,789 in the name of Nishioka et al., filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/258,483 in the name of Numata et al., filed Sep. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,574 in the name of Tsukamoto et al., filed Sep. 23, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,885 in the name of Umemoto et al., filed Sep. 23, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/260,986 in the name of Watanabe et al., filed Sep. 29, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/263,272 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Oct. 6, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/263,660 in the name of Umemoto et al., filed Oct. 7, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,062 in the name of Watanabe et al., filed Oct. 12, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,594 in the name of Inoue et al., filed Oct. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,884 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Oct. 17, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/375,674 in the name of Inoue et al., filed Dec. 1, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/578,148 in the name of Umemoto et al., filed Aug. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/581,186 in the name of Kazuhiro Umemoto et al., filed Aug. 24, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/580,000 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Aug. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,862 in the name of Uenishi et al., filed Sep. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,909 in the name of Kazuhiro Umemoto et al., filed Sep. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/108,113 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Dec. 16, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,629 in the name of Umemoto et al., filed Jan. 10, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,001 in the name of Inoue et al., filed Oct. 19, 2011. |
Dec. 27, 2011 Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/075618. |
Aug. 6, 2014 Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,574. |
Nov. 27, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/258,483. |
Oct. 4, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/259,885. |
Jun. 15, 2010 International Search Report issued in PCT/JP2010/054740 (with translation). |
Jun. 15, 2010 Written Opinion issued in PCT/JP2010/054740 (with translation). |
Jun. 20, 2012 Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 10845966.0. |
Jun. 15, 2010 International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/JP2010/054731 (with translation). |
Jun. 29, 2010 International Search Report issued International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/056345. |
Apr. 4, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,710. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,774 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Sep. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,710 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Oct. 12, 2011. |
Oct. 24, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,710. |
Jan. 17, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,733. |
International Search Report dated Jun. 15, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/JP2010/054729. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/JP2011/066628 dated Sep. 13, 2011 (with Translation). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/502,210 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed on Apr. 16, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/499,211 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Mar.29, 2012. |
Jan. 22, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/499,211. |
May 27, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,710. |
Sep. 18, 2014 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,710. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/934,080 in the name of Bisaiji et al., filed Jul. 2013. |
Oct. 2, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,862. |
Jul. 9, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,774. |
Dec. 9, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,506. |
Dec. 27, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/502,210. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/262,506 in the name of Bisaili et al., filed Sep. 30, 2011. |
Dec. 22, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/264,230. |
Jun. 3, 2015 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,629. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130149205 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |