The present disclosure relates generally to the identification and management of exhaust valve activation faults.
To achieve the foregoing and in accordance with the purpose of the present disclosure, a variety of engine controllers and engine control methods are described. In one aspect, in response to the detection of an exhaust valve actuation fault associated with a first cylinder, fueling to at least the first cylinder is cut off. Actuation of the faulting exhaust valve is attempted in a set of one or more second working cycles that follows the faulting (first) working cycle in the faulting cylinder, wherein the one or more second working cycles are not fueled. For each of the one or more second working cycles, whether the first exhaust valve actuated properly during the set of one or more second working cycles is determined. Operation of the first cylinder is resumed when it is determined that the first exhaust valve actuated properly during the set of one or more second working cycles. Operation of the first cylinder is not resumed when it is determined that the first exhaust valve did not actuate properly during the set of one or more second working cycles. If the exhaust valve is controlled as part of a group of exhaust valves, then fuel may be cut off to all of the cylinders associated with all of the exhaust valves in the group of exhaust valves. The group of exhaust valves may include all of the exhaust valves of the engine.
In another aspect, in response to the detection of an exhaust valve actuation fault, fueling to an associated first cylinder is cut off. Actuation of the faulting exhaust valve is attempted in a set of one or more engine cycles that follows the faulting working cycle, wherein the faulting cylinder is not fueled during the one or more engine cycles. An electric motor is utilized to maintain at least one of a desired drive torque and a desired crankshaft rotation speed during the one or more engine cycles. Whether or not to resume operation of the first cylinder is desired is based at least in part on whether at least some of the attempts to actuate the first exhaust valve in the set of one or more engine cycles are successful.
In another aspect, a controller for controlling an engine is provided where in response to the detection of an exhaust valve actuation fault, fueling to at least a first cylinder associated to the faulting exhaust valve is cut off. An attempt to actuate the faulting exhaust valve is made in a set of one or more second working cycles that follows the first working cycle. If the faulting valve works properly operation of the first cylinder is resumed. If the first exhaust valve did not actuate properly during the set of one or more second working cycles, then operation of the first cylinder is not resumed.
These and other features of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below in the detailed description and in conjunction with the following figures.
The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
There are a number of internal combustion engine control technologies that contemplate deactivating and subsequently reactivating an engine's intake and/or exhaust valves. For example, Applicant has extensively described dynamic skip fire engine control in which cylinders are selectively skipped or fired. The intake and/or exhaust valves are typically deactivated during skipped working cycles so that air is not pumped through the associated cylinder. There are a number of different valve deactivation technologies. Some contemplate individually deactivating/reactivating intake and exhaust valves, while others contemplate deactivating/reactivating valves in groups—as for example deactivating/reactivating the intake valve(s) and exhaust valve(s) associated with a single cylinder as a group, or deactivating/reactivating a set of exhaust valves or a set of intake valves as a group. A group of intake valves may include all intake valves of the engine. A group of exhaust valves may include all of the exhaust valves of the engine. The variations in valve actuation technologies leads to a variety of different potential failure modes in which one or more of the valves may fail to reactivate when desired.
The applicant has described a number of techniques for detecting valve actuation faults. By way of example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,562,470; 9,650,923, 9,890,732, and 11,143,575 (each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) describe a number of exhaust valve actuation fault detection techniques. For example, one suitable method for detecting exhaust valve actuation faults is based on monitoring angular acceleration of the crankshaft. During the exhaust stroke of a fired working cycle with the valves working properly, it is expected that a small negative torque will be applied to the crankshaft by the piston associated with the exhausting cylinder. In contrast, if the exhaust valve fails to actuate during an exhaust stroke after a cylinder has been fired, the hot combustion gases will be compressed during the exhaust stroke resulting in a much stronger negative torque on the crankshaft with there being a measurable difference from the expected crankshaft acceleration during the exhaust stroke. The detection of such a differential between the actual crankshaft acceleration and the expected crankshaft acceleration can be used to identify exhaust valve actuation faults.
A variety of other technologies can be used to help detect valve actuation faults. For example, if an intake valve opens after the failed exhaust valve opening, the high pressure compressed gases within the cylinder will exhaust into the intake manifold. This creates a high pressure pulse having a characteristic signature within the intake manifold that can also be readily detected thereby identifying both that the exhaust valve failed to open, and that the intake valve did open. Conversely, if no high pressure pulse is detected in the intake manifold after the detection of a post cylinder firing exhaust valve actuation failure, that provides strong evidence that the intake valve has also not actuated. There are a variety of other technologies that can be used to detect valve actuation faults and several such technologies are described in some of the incorporated patents.
Once an exhaust valve actuation fault is identified, it can be helpful to manage the operation of the engine and/or an associated powertrain or drive train in specific ways to help mitigate adverse impacts of such faults, especially if such faults reoccur. A few management schemes that are particularly well adapted to handling exhaust valve deactivation faults will be described. Some embodiments are described in the context of skip fire engine operations in which cylinders may be selectively fired or deactivated during selected working cycles. Other embodiments described herein are applicable to handling exhaust valve activation faults regardless of whether the engine is operating in a skip fire or other operating mode.
Turning to
When a fault is detected (the “Yes” branch from decision block 106) specific actions may be taken to mitigate the impact of the fault. Initially fuel delivery to the faulting cylinder(s) is prevented in the next and subsequent working cycles (block 108) at least until the problem has been resolved. Preventing fueling of the following working cycle(s) mitigates the risk of the faulting cylinder causing any problems. For example, if the exhaust valve fault continues in one or more following working cycles in the faulting cylinder while the intake valve opens and fueling is performed in the regular course, the exhaust gases would be vented back into the intake manifold disrupting the engine's operation and risking overheating of the intake manifold.
Regardless of the intake valve management scheme chosen, an attempt is made to reactivate the exhaust valve for the faulting cylinder(s) in the next and, if/as necessary, subsequent following working cycles as represented by block 114. In general, an attempt is made to reactivate the faulting exhaust valve(s) in the next working cycle(s) without fueling or firing the associated cylinder(s). A successful reactivation of the exhaust valve can be detected in a variety of manners. For example, in some implementations the torque signature associated with the exhaust stroke (as reflected by the crankshaft acceleration) is used to identify that the exhaust valve has indeed actuated. When a faulting cylinder contains a high pressure exhaust spring, the difference in the torque signatures between a venting exhaust stroke and a non-venting exhaust stroke will be significant and are easily detectable. Even when the intake valve has been opened such that the faulting cylinder effectively holds an air spring, there is a non-trivial difference in the torque signatures of a vented vs. a non-vented exhaust stroke that can be detected via analysis of the crankshaft acceleration.
More generally, the torque signature associated with any intake or exhaust stroke (and often the torque signatures associated with compression and expansion as well) will vary based on whether an associated intake or exhaust valve was actuated or not. As such, crankshaft acceleration measurements can be used to determine whether a valve has opened (or not opened) as directed/expected during the testing period.
Additionally or alternatively, data from a λ-sensor (or other oxygen sensor) 56 can be used to determine or help determine whether an exhaust valve has opened. For example, when an intake valve(s) is opened during test working cycles in the testing period, intake manifold air will be introduced into the cylinder during the intake stroke. If/when the corresponding exhaust valve(s) opens, the air charge in the cylinder will be expelled into the exhaust system. The passing air charge passing the λ-sensor 56 can be expected to have much more oxygen in it than other exhaust gases and will be readily identifiable in the λ-sensor 56 data providing another mechanism for determining or verifying whether the exhaust valve has been opened as instructed.
In another specific example, when the intake valve(s) is opened during the testing period, an intake manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor 62 can also be used to determine whether the exhaust valve has opened during test working cycles. Specifically, if the air charge in the cylinder is not vented to the exhaust system during the exhaust stroke, it will vent back into the intake manifold 18 when the intake valve is opened. This results in a pressure rise within the intake manifold 18 which will be detected by the MAP sensor 62.
These various tests and others can be used individually or in any combination and/or in combination with any other suitable valve actuation detection technology to determine whether the exhaust valve(s) have been opened as instructed during the testing period. The crankshaft rotation sensor 60, MAP sensor 62, and λ-sensor 56 are mentioned specifically because many current commercially available engines already include such sensors and thus the exhaust valve actuations faults and testing faults can be detected without requiring additional hardware modifications to the engine and their associated costs. However, it should be appreciated that when other suitable sensors are available, such as exhaust manifold pressure sensors 54 and exhaust valve proximity sensors, they can readily be used in combination with and/or in place of any of the mentioned sensors.
If the exhaust valves are determined to be working properly in the test period (the “Yes” branch of block 118), normal engine operation (e.g., normal skip fire operation) may be resumed (block 122). Alternatively, if the exhaust valve(s) are determined not to be functioning properly for any reason, appropriate remedial actions may be taken as represented by block 124. The appropriate remedial actions may vary based on the nature of the fault. Typical remedial actions may include reporting an engine or valve actuation fault to an engine diagnostics log, setting an engine malfunction indicator light (MIL), disabling the faulting cylinder(s), and operating using only the remaining “good” cylinders, etc.
Individual Exhaust Valve Control
In an embodiment, each cylinder can be individually controlled. In an example, if it is determined that the exhaust valve for cylinder 4 is malfunctioning, at decision block 106, then fuel to cylinder 4 is cut (block 108). In one embodiment, the intake valve for cylinder 4 is also deactivated (block 110). In another embodiment, the intake valve for cylinder 4 is kept active (block 112). In this example, the other five active cylinders provide sufficient power to keep the engine spinning (block 116). The sensors 60, 62, 54, and 56 may be used to help to determine if the exhaust valves are working properly. In particular, the system determines whether or not the exhaust valve for cylinder 4 is properly working. If it is determined that the exhaust valve for cylinder 4 is working properly at block 118, then normal operation is resumed at block 122. If after several engine cycles it is determined that the exhaust valve for cylinder 4 is not working properly at block 118, then a malfunction is indicated, and other appropriate actions may be taken at block 124. In an embodiment, a check engine light may be illuminated, and the error may be reported to the ECU 10, fuel remains cut off from cylinder 4, and the engine is powered without cylinder 4.
In some embodiments, a cylinder individual valve control system may have skip fire control. The skip fire control may be provided by the ECU 10 or may be provided by other systems. In this example, cylinder 4 is removed from the skip fire sequence. In such an embodiment, the skip fire controller is arranged to alter the firing sequence so that the desired engine torque can be delivered without significantly impacting the engine's performance or even being noticeable to a driver.
Bank Exhaust Valve Control
In another embodiment, the cylinders are controlled as part of a bank (or group) of cylinders. In an example, cylinders 4, 5, and 6 form a first bank of cylinders, with exhaust valves connected to a first exhaust manifold 20A, and cylinders 1, 2, and 3 form a second bank of cylinders, with exhaust valves connected to a second exhaust manifold 20B. If it is determined that the exhaust valve for cylinder 4 is malfunctioning, at decision block 106, then fuel to the bank of cylinders 4, 5, and 6 is cut (block 108). In one embodiment, the intake valves for cylinders 4, 5, and 6 are also deactivated (block 110). In another embodiment, the intake valves for cylinders 4, 5, and 6 are kept active (block 112). In this example, the other bank of cylinders 1, 2, and 3 provide sufficient power to keep the engine spinning (block 116). If it is determined that the exhaust valve for cylinder 4 is working properly at block 118, then normal operation of all cylinders is resumed at block 122. If after several engine cycles it is determined that the exhaust valve for cylinder 4 is not working properly at block 118, then a malfunction is indicated, and other appropriate actions may be taken at block 124. In an embodiment, a check engine light may be illuminated, and the error may be reported to the ECU 10 and the engine remains powered by only the second bank of cylinders 1, 2, and 3, while fuel is cut off from cylinders 4, 5, and 6.
Exhaust Valve Control of All Exhaust Valves
In another embodiment, the engine system has a single exhaust valve controller to control all of the exhaust valves. In such an embodiment, the group of exhaust valves is all exhaust valves of the engine, and the group of associated cylinders is all cylinders in the engine. Such engine systems may have only three or four cylinders. Such engine systems may have more than four cylinders. If it is determined that an exhaust valve is malfunctioning, at decision block 106, then fuel to all of cylinders is cut (block 108). In one embodiment, the intake valves for all of the cylinders are also deactivated (block 110). In another embodiment, the intake valves for the cylinders are kept active (block 112). In this example, the momentum allows the engine to continue to spin for one or more engine cycles (block 116). If it is determined that exhaust valves are working properly at block 118, then normal operation of all cylinders is resumed at block 122. If it is determined that the exhaust valves are not working properly at block 118, then a malfunction is indicated, and other appropriate actions may be taken at block 124. In an embodiment, a check engine light may be illuminated, and the error may be reported to the ECU 10 and the engine system is stopped.
Hybrid Embodiments
Hybrid powertrains facilitate a number of other potential actions that may be used in various embodiments. For example, if one or more cylinders are deactivated due to exhaust valve actuation faulting, a motor/generator unit (MGU) can supply some of the power necessary to operate as appropriate. Depending on the nature of the fault and the number of cylinders that are suffering exhaust valve actuation faults, this could be supplying power to facilitate safely pulling to the side of the road or returning home or to an appropriate workshop. In addition, the electric motor may be used to rotate the engine in order to test the exhaust valve, while fuel to the associated cylinder or group of cylinders is cut off.
Some hybrid powertrain systems may have minimum battery state of charge limits or maximum power draw limits, so that electricity storage devices such as batteries or capacitors have enough power to start the engine. In some embodiments, when all or some of the cylinders are deactivated and the motor is needed to move the vehicle, the system may allow the violation of the minimum battery state of charge limits and/or maximum power draw limits in order to provide enough power to the electric motor to move the vehicle to a safe location, such as the side of a road, home, or an appropriate workshop, as part of the appropriate action at block 124.
In another embodiment, where one or more, but not all of the cylinders are deactivated, the motor may be used to provide additional torque. The combination of the engine and the motor may be used to maintain a desired speed or may provide a reduced speed that is sufficient to move the vehicle to safety. In some embodiments, where the fuel is not cut to all cylinders, the system may allow the violation of minimum battery state of charge limits and/or maximum power draw limits.
Alternative Embodiments
In various embodiments, the period for the deactivation of the intake valves can vary based on the needs of any particular implementation. In some embodiments, the intake valves will remain deactivated throughout a testing period, which may continue until the activation fault has been resolved. In other embodiments, the intake valves may be deactivated for a designated testing period—e.g., a designated number of working cycles or a designated period of time. In some implementations, it is desirable to deactivate the intake valve(s) associated with the faulting cylinder(s) immediately (i.e., for the next working cycle(s) in such cylinder(s) so that the combustion gases do not vent back into the intake manifold). This approach is particularly valuable in implementations where the intake valves are not guaranteed to be robust enough to withstand the intake valves opening into the very high pressure exhaust gases that are present in a cylinder that has been fired, but not exhausted. A potential drawback of this approach is that when both the intake and exhaust valves are held closed, a high-pressure exhaust spring may be created in the faulting cylinder which can reduce engine performance.
In other embodiments, it may be desirable to keep the intake valves associated with the faulting cylinder(s) active so that they open each working cycle thereby venting and re-venting the associated cylinders throughout the testing period as represented by block 112. This allows the exhaust gases to vent into the intake manifold during the first “intake” stroke and effectively eliminates the high pressure spring. The cylinder then effectively re-intakes each subsequent working cycle. In still other embodiments, other desired combinations of re-intake and holding the intake valve(s) closed during sequential test period working cycles can be used.
The engine designer may have wide latitude in defining what level of verification is required to return to normal operations. In many cases, normal operations may be resumed as soon as the faulting exhaust valve has been determined to have opened properly. In others circumstances it may be desirable to require that the faulting exhaust valve(s) operate properly over two or more engine cycles before normal operation is resumed. In some embodiments, if an exhaust valve actuation fault occurs intermittently at a high frequency, an ECU may be programmed to keep the associated cylinder deactivated. In such an embodiment, logic may be provided so that if an exhaust valve actuation fault is detected a threshold number of times within a specified time period, then the associated valve is deactivated, and fueling of the cylinder is cut off until there is a repair or reset. In an alternative embodiment, logic may be provided so that if an exhaust valve actuation fault is detected a threshold number of times within a specified period, and the actuation fault is resolved a threshold number of times within a specified period, then the exhaust valve is kept active and is never deactivated until there is a repair or reset.
In various embodiments, the exhaust system 26 may include any number of various aftertreatment systems, including but not limited to a Diesel particulate filter, a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system, a Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) system and/or a NOx trap which are generally used for Diesel or lean burn internal combustion engines and/or a three-way catalytic converter, which is typically used for a gasoline-fueled, spark ignition, internal combustion engine.
It should be understood that the particular configuration of the internal combustion engine 16, the intake manifold 18 and the two manifolds exhaust manifolds 20A and 20B is merely exemplary. In actual embodiments, the number of cylinders or banks and the number and/or arrangement of the cylinders may widely vary. For example, the number of cylinders may range from one to any number, such as 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 or 16 or more. Also, the cylinders may be arranged in-line as shown, in a V configuration, in multiple cylinder banks, etc. The internal combustion engine may be a Diesel engine, a lean burn engine, a gasoline-fueled engine, a spark ignition engine, or a multi-fuel engine. The engine may also use any combination of ignition source, fuel-stratification, air/fuel stoichiometry, or combustion cycle. Also, on the exhaust side, varying numbers of exhaust manifolds may be used, ranging from just one shared by all cylinders or multiple exhaust manifolds.
In some embodiments, the internal combustion engine 16 can optionally be equipped with either or both a turbocharger 30 and/or an Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system 40. The turbocharger 30 is used to boost the pressure in the intake manifold 18 above atmospheric pressure. With boosted air, the internal combustion engine 16 can generate more power compared to a naturally aspirated engine because more air, and proportionally more fuel, can be input into the individual cylinders.
The optional turbocharger 30 includes a turbine 32, a compressor 34, a waste gate valve 36 and an air charge cooler 38. The turbine 32 receives combusted exhaust gases from one or more of the exhaust manifold(s) 20A and/or 20B. In situations where more than two exhaust manifolds are used, their outputs are typically combined to drive the turbine 32. The exhaust gases passing through the turbine drives the compressor 34, which in turn, boosts the pressure of air provided to the air charge cooler 38. The air charge cooler 38 is responsible for cooling the compressed air to a desired temperature or temperature range before re-circulating back into the air intake manifold 18.
In some optional embodiments, a waste gate valve 36 may be used. By opening the waste gate valve 36, some or all of the combusted exhaust gases from the exhaust manifold(s) 20 can bypass the turbine 32. As a result, the back-pressure supplied to the fins of the turbine 32 can be controlled, which in turn, controls the degree to which the compressor 34 compresses the input air eventually supplied to the intake manifold 18.
In various non-exclusive embodiments, the turbine 32 may use a variable geometry subsystem, such as a variable vane or variable nozzle turbocharger system. In which case, an internal mechanism (not shown) within the turbine 32 alters a gas flow path through the fins of the turbine to optimize turbine operation as the exhaust gas flow rate through the turbine changes. If the turbine 32 is part of a variable geometry or variable nozzle turbocharger system, the waste gate 36 may not be required.
The EGR system 40 includes an EGR valve 42 and an EGR cooler 44. The EGR valve 42 is fluidly coupled to one or more of the exhaust manifolds 20A and/or 20B and is arranged to provide a controlled amount of the combusted exhaust gases to the EGR cooler 44. In turn, the EGR cooler 44 cools the exhaust gases before re-circulating the exhaust gases back into the intake manifold 18. By adjusting the position of the EGR valve 42 the amount of exhaust gas re-circulated into the intake manifold 18 is controlled. The more the EGR valve 42 is opened, the more exhaust gas flows into the intake manifold 18. Conversely, the more the EGR valve 42 is closed, the less exhaust gas is re-circulated back into the intake manifold 18.
The recirculation of a portion of the exhaust gases back into the internal combustion engine 16 acts to dilute the amount of fresh air supplied by the air input runners 22 to the cylinders. By mixing the fresh air with gases that are inert to combustion, the exhaust gases act as absorbents of combustion generated heat and reduce peak temperatures within the cylinders. As a result, NOx emissions are typically reduced.
Although only a few embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it should be appreciated that the invention may be implemented in many other forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present embodiments should be considered illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Application No. 63/136,090, filed Jan. 11, 2021, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4434767 | Kohama et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4489695 | Kohama et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4509488 | Forster et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
5041976 | Marko et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5200898 | Yuhara et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5278760 | Ribbens et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5355713 | Scourtes et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5377631 | Schechter | Jan 1995 | A |
5377720 | Stobbs et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5433107 | Angermaier et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5490486 | Diggs | Feb 1996 | A |
5537963 | Hasebe et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5581022 | Sprague et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584281 | Katoh | Dec 1996 | A |
5721375 | Bidner | Feb 1998 | A |
5734100 | Kishimoto et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5753804 | La Palm et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774823 | James et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790757 | Meijer | Aug 1998 | A |
5796261 | Golab | Aug 1998 | A |
5803040 | Biesinger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826563 | Patel et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6006155 | Wu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006157 | Dai et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023651 | Nakayama et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6158411 | Morikawa | Dec 2000 | A |
6382175 | van der Staay et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6431154 | Inoue | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439176 | Payne et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457353 | Kanke et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494087 | Hatano et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6564623 | Zanetti | May 2003 | B2 |
6584951 | Patel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591666 | Kacewicz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615776 | Andrian-Werburg | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6619258 | McKay et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6655353 | Rayl | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6691021 | Takagi | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6752004 | Inada et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752121 | Rayl et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6782865 | Rayl et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6801848 | Mathews | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7025035 | Duty et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7063062 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066136 | Ogiso | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086386 | Doering | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7171929 | Dosdall et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7234442 | Hanson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7257482 | Yasui | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7314034 | Waters et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7357019 | Donald | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7395813 | Pagot | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7484484 | Frincke et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7490001 | Izelfanane | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7503296 | Rozario et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503312 | Surnilla et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7546827 | Wade et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7577511 | Tripathi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7595971 | Ganev et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7757657 | Albertson et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762237 | Gibson et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7819096 | McConville et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7854215 | Rozario et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7900509 | Feldkamp et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908913 | Cinpinski et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918210 | Gibson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7921709 | Doering et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930087 | Gibson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942039 | Huber et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7946262 | Borraccia et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8006670 | Rollinger et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8091412 | Forte et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099224 | Tripathi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103433 | Hartmann et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8181508 | Cinpinski et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8286471 | Doering et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301362 | Buslepp et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8511281 | Tripathi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8550055 | Ferch et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8601862 | Bowman et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8631688 | Rayl et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8666641 | Rollinger et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8667835 | Doering et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8826891 | Nishikiori et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8931255 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9086020 | Tripathi et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9175613 | Parsels et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9212610 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9399963 | Loucks et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9399964 | Younkins et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9523319 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9562470 | Younkins et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9581098 | Chen et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9587567 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9650923 | Parsels et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9784644 | Chen et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9890732 | Younkins et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10072592 | Younkins et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10088388 | Chen et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10816438 | Chen et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
11125175 | Chen et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11143575 | Chen | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11326534 | Chen et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
20010047792 | Akazaki et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020121252 | Payne et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030213445 | Bloms et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050033501 | Liu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050150561 | Flynn et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050199220 | Ogiso | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060129307 | Yasui | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070101959 | Soejima | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113803 | Froloff et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080060427 | Hoshi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092836 | Mutti et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080236267 | Hartmann et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243364 | Sun et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090099755 | Harbert | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090158830 | Malaczynski et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090254242 | Kweon et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100031738 | Feldkamp et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050993 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106458 | Leu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100154738 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100175463 | Doering et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100286891 | Huang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100288035 | Arakawa | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110072893 | Malacznski | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120109495 | Tripathi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143471 | Tripathi et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173122 | Nishikiori et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120285161 | Kerns et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310505 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000752 | Saito et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130325290 | Pierik | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140041624 | Rayl et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140332705 | Stubbs | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140261317 | Loucks et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150075458 | Parsels et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150218978 | Kubani et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160281617 | Batal et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170002761 | Dudar | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170101956 | Younkins et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170218866 | Shost et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170370804 | Chen et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20190234323 | Weber et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200263617 | Hashimoto et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210003088 | Chen et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20220205398 | Chen et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1204003 | Jan 1999 | CN |
10 2006 050597 | Jul 2007 | DE |
10 2007 040117 | Feb 2009 | DE |
10 2008 011614 | Jun 2011 | DE |
1069298 | Jan 2001 | EP |
2000-248982 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2010-174857 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2011-99338 | May 2011 | JP |
2011-179432 | Sep 2011 | JP |
10-2017-0125590 | Nov 2017 | KR |
WO 2010006311 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2011085383 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 27, 2022 from International Application No. PCT/US2022/011337. |
Cybenko, “Approximation by Superpositions of a Sigmoidal Function”, Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, (1989) 2: 303-314. |
Hinton et al., “Deep Neural Networks for Acoustic Modeling in Speech Recognition”, Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 29(6): 8297, 2012a, Apr. 27, 2012. |
Krizhevsky et al., “ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks”, https://papers.nips.cc/paper/4824-imagenet-classification-with-deep-convolutional-neural-networks.pdf, Jan. 2012. |
Weston et al., “Towards Al-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Tasks”, ICLR, Dec. 31, 2015. |
Glorot et al., “Understanding the Difficulty of Training Deep Feedforward Neural Networks”, In Proceedings of AISTATS 2010, vol. 9, p. 249256, May 2010. |
Wilcutts et al., “Design and Benefits of Dynamic Skip Fire Strategies for Cylinder Deactivated Engines”, SAE Int. J. Engines, 6(1): 2013, doi: 10.4271/2013-01-0359, Apr. 8, 2013. |
Serrano et al., “Methods of Evaluating and Mitigating NVH When Operating an Engine in Dynamic Skip Fire”, SAE Int. J. Engines 7(3): 2014, doi: 10.4271/2014-01-1675, Apr. 1, 2014. |
Liu et al., “Standards Compliant H1L Bench Development for Dynamic Skip Fire Feature Validation”, SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0171, 2015, Apr. 14, 2015. |
Chen et al., “Misfire Detection in a Dynamic Skip Fire Engine”, SAE Int. J. Engines 8(2): 3 89-398, 2015, Apr. 14, 2015. |
Chien et al., “Modeling and Simulation of Airflow Dynamics in a Dynamic Skip Fire Engine”, SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1717, Apr. 14, 2015. |
Eisazadeh-Far et al., “Fuel Economy Gains Through Dynamic-Skip-Fire in Spark Ignition Engines”, SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0672, Jul. 20, 2015. |
Wilcutts et al., “eDSF: Dynamic Skip Fire Extension to Hybrid Powertrains”, 7th Aachen Colloquium China Automobile and Engine Technology 2017. |
Ortiz-Soto et al., “DSF: Dynamic Skip Fire with Homogeneous Lean Burn for Improved Fuel Consumption, Emissions and Drivability”, SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1891, Apr. 3, 2018. |
Chen et al., “Machine Learning for Misfire Detection in a Dynamic Skip Fire Engine”, SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1158, Apr. 3, 2018. |
Chen et al., “Dynamic Skip Fire Applied to a Diesel Engine for Improved Fuel Consumption and Emissions”, Presented at the 4. Int. Conf. Diesel Powertrains 3.0, Jul. 3-4, 2018. |
Younkins et al., “Advances in Dynamic Skip Fire: eDSF and mDSF”, 27th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology, 2018. |
Younkins et al., “Dynamic Skip Fire: New Technologies for Innovative Propulsion Systems”, General Motors Global Propulsion Systems, 39th International Vienna Motor Symposium, Apr. 2018. |
Younkins et al., “Dynamic Skip Fire: The Ultimate Cylinder Deactivation Strategy”, 29th Edition of the SIA Powertrain Congress, Versailles, Jun. 7-8, 2017. |
Asik et al., “Transient A/F Estimation and Control Using a Neural Network”, SAE Technical Paper 970619, 1997 (SP-1236), 1997. |
Kalogirou et al., “Development of an Artificial Neural Network Based Fault Diagnostic System of an Electric Car”, Design and Technologies for Automotive Safety-Critical Systems, SAE Technical Paper 2000-011055, 2000 (SP-1507), Mar. 6-9, 2000. |
Wu et al., “Misfire Detection Using a Dynamic Neural Network with Output Feedback”, Electronic Engine Controls 1998: Diagnostics and Controls, SAE Technical Paper 980515, 1998 (SP-1357), Feb. 23-26, 1998. |
Nareid et al., “Detection of Engine Misfire Events Using an Artificial Neural Network”, Electronic Engine Controls, SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1363, 2004 (SP-1822), Mar. 8-11, 2004. |
Kirkham et al., “Misfire Detection Including Confidence Indicators Using a Hardware Neural Network”, Electronic Engine Controls, SAE Technical Paper, 2006-11-1349, 2006 (SP-2003), Apr. 3-6, 2006. |
Merkisz et al., “Overview of Engine Misfire Detection Methods Used in On Board Diagnostics”, Journal of Kones Combustion Engines, vol. 8, No. 1-2, 2001. |
Chatterjee et al., “Comparison of Misfire Detection Technologies on Sparkignition Engines for Meeting On-Board Diagnostic Regulation”, 2013 SAE International, doi: 10 4271/2013-01-2884, Nov. 27, 2013. |
Bue et al., “Misfire Detection System Based on the Measure of Crankshaft Angular Velocity”, Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications, 2007, pp. 149-161. |
Baghi Abadi et al., “Single and Multiple Misfire Detection in Internal Combustion Engines Using Vold-Kalman Filter Order-Tracking”, SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1536, 2011, doi: 10,4271/2011-01-1536, May 17, 2011. |
Shiao et al., “Cylinder Pressure and Combustion Heat Release Estimation for SI Engine Diagnostics Using Nonlinear Sliding Observers”, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 3. No. 1, Mar. 1995. |
Ball et al., “Torque Estimation and Misfire Detection Using Block Angular Acceleration”, SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0560, Mar. 6-9, 2000. |
Abu-Mostafa et al., “Learning From Data”, AMLbook.com, ISBN 10:1 60049 006 9, ISBN 13:978 1 60049 006 4, Chapter 7, 2012. |
Pedregosa et al., “Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python”, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12 (2011) 2825-2830, Oct. 2011. |
Tan, “Fourier Neural Networks and Generalized Single Hidden Layer Networks in Aircraft Engine Fault Diagnostics”, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Oct. 2006, vol. 128, pp. 773-782. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/860,838, filed Jul. 8, 2022. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 16, 2022 for International Application No. PCT/US2022/036574. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220220919 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63136090 | Jan 2021 | US |