Chlor-alkali electrolysis is the electrolytic process of widest industrial interest together with the production of aluminium from molten salts.
Chlor-alkali electrolysis is presently carried out making use of three types of technology, namely the mercury cathode, the diaphragm and the ion-exchange membrane one. The membrane technology is the latest of the three and is invariably employed for the construction of new plants and the retrofitting of old plants whose cells have reached the end of service life. The remaining two are technologies developed in particular during the '40es and '50es and are still the basis of plants accounting for about 70% of the world production. While mercury cathode electrolysis is destined to be sooner or later abandoned, not primarily for technical reasons but rather for the by now consolidated opposition of the public opinion to any industrial process that might, even only potentially, introduce heavy metals in the environment, the diaphragm electrolysis maintains a remarkable validity in view of the technical improvements which have taken place in the years, that allowed to sensibly lower the energy consumption and to achieve new types of diaphragm free of asbestos, which was originally its main component. These new types of diaphragm, whose use is progressively spreading in the industrial plants, are made of a complex mixture of inorganic particles and fibres, for instance zirconium oxide, stabilised by a chemically inert polymeric binder such as for example polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with formation of a porous film characterised by better structural stability and better mechanical properties than those typical of the conventional asbestos-based diaphragms.
Among the other technical improvements which have been brought in the diaphragm chlor-alkali electrolysis technology, particularly relevant are the modifications to the internal design of the cells and in particular of the anodes which have permitted to decrease the operating voltage, and therefore the electric energy consumption which is a direct function thereof, to a remarkable extent. As regards the anodes, graphite, that was the original construction material, has been nearly totally replaced by titanium coated with an electrocatalytic film made of mixtures of platinum group metal oxides. The machinability and weldability of the new material, which is routinely provided in form of sheet, expanded sheet and perforated sheet, allowed adopting a new geometric shape known as “box” which produced a remarkable cell voltage reduction compared to that typical of the graphite anodes. With the “box” anodes, a sensible gap however exists, indicatively of 5 millimetres, between the surface of the same anodes and the surface of the diaphragms: this gap, necessary to permit the introduction of the anodes into the cell body without damaging the diaphragm, entails an energy consumption due to the ohmic drop generated by the passage of electric current through the brine present in the gap itself. To minimise this energy consumption, the “box” anodes are generally replaced by the so called expandable anodes, nowadays widely used, in which the two main surfaces facing the diaphragm are connected to the current collecting stem through a pair of flexible titanium sheets: in this way the two surfaces result movable and may be retained by means of appropriate constraint elements in order to permit the installation of the anode into the cell body without damaging the diaphragm Once the installation is completed, the constraint elements are extracted and the movable sheets are left free to expand under the action of the connecting flexible sheets. The movable surfaces of the expandable anode should ideally contact the diaphragm surfaces suppressing the gap of about 5 millimetres which is typical, as mentioned above, of the “box” anodes, eliminating thereby the relevant ohmic drop in the brine and the associated electric energy consumption. Actually, the pressure exerted by the flexible sheets tends to exhaust before the anode surfaces come in contact with the diaphragm surface. This is due both to a certain relaxation experienced by the flexible sheets during the phase of holding in the retained position, and to the need of limiting the pressure exerted by the same flexible sheets in the retained position to allow, an easy extraction of the constraint elements. The result of this situation is that the gap between the anode and diaphragm surfaces is certainly decreased with respect to the typical situation of the “box” anodes, but it's not completely suppressed, with a consequent residue of electric energy consumption associated to the remnant of a partial ohmic drop. Moreover it is not possible to produce anodes wherein the two flexible sheets connecting the movable surfaces to the current collecting stem are exactly equivalent: actually, either due to differences of thickness or mechanical characteristics or to manufacturing, albeit within the range of the design tolerances, it happens that the expansion is not uniform, giving rise to a difference of alignment of the anode surfaces with respect to the diaphragm surfaces and a lack of parallelism between the two. This situation implies a lack of uniformity in the current distribution inside each cell with increase of the operating voltage and decrease of efficiency.
In patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,534,122 an improved expandable anode structure is disclosed, wherein after the installation in the cell and after the extraction of the constraint elements the anode expansion is completed by means of the introduction of appropriate forcing elastic elements (shown in
The scope of the present invention is to overcome the inconveniences associated with the use of the forcing elastic elements known in the art allowing to obtain a complete expansion of the movable anode surfaces while guaranteeing a homogeneous and freely adjustable diaphragm compression, particularly as a function of the diaphragm quality and of the mechanic characteristics thereof.
Thus in a first aspect the present invention provides the use of forcing elastic elements installed inside expandable type anodes, wherein such elements are characterised by having an adjustable span.
In a second aspect of the invention the span of the forcing elastic elements is externally adjustable after the installation of said expandable anodes in the electrolysis cells.
In a third aspect the outside span adjustment of the elastic elements of the invention is carried out with an extractable tool.
In a fourth aspect said extractable tool is characterised by high torque resistance.
In a fifth aspect said high torque resistance extractable tool is made of a low-alloy steel in a quenched and tempered state.
In a sixth aspect the forcing elastic element of the invention also acts as a constraint element capable of holding the expandable anode in a restrained condition during the installation in the cell, so as to prevent damaging of the diaphragm.
In a seventh aspect the forcing elastic element of the invention is suitable as well for being introduced in expandable anodes constructed according to the indications of the prior art and previously operated.
In an eight aspect the forcing elastic element of the invention consists of a shy having a U-shaped profile and provided with at least one externally operated span adjusting device.
In a ninth aspect the externally operated span adjusting device comprises a collar fastening said forcing elastic element through appropriate openings made in said element and which is operated by a suitable gear.
In a tenth aspect said gear is rotated by means of the extractable tool.
In a further aspect the externally operated span adjusting device consists, in a second embodiment, of a threaded shaft or of a pair of threaded shafts operated by means of an appropriate lever.
In a final aspect the forcing elastic element consisting of the U-shaped sheet provided with span adjusting device is also provided with fins engaging the connecting flexible sheets in the restrained position before the installation.
The invention is disclosed below making reference to the following figures:
In particular, as regards the cell of
During operation, the cell wall (10), whereto the fingers (1) are secured, and the conductive base (2) are respectively connected to the negative polarity and to the positive polarity of a rectifier.
The cell assemblage comprises the following steps: diaphragm deposition on the fingers (1) and the wall (10) with subsequent stabilising thermal treatment, securing of the anodes (3) to the conductive base (2), positioning of the cell body consisting of the fingers (1) and wall (10) on the conductive base (2) so that the fingers and the anodes result reciprocally intercalated, as shown in the figure. This latter passage is very critical since it must be avoided that the anodes (3) graze against the diaphragm deposited on the fingers (1) damaging the same.
The anodes (3), employed to replace the old anodes consisting of graphite plates, may be substantially of two types, “box” or expandable.
The structure of the “box” anode is shown in
To avoid this inconvenience the “box” anodes are in general replaced by the more recent expandable anodes, whose structure is sketched in
It can be noticed in particular that the mesh (13) doesn't form a rigid box anymore, being instead subdivided into two independent movable surfaces, (13A) and (13B), each secured to the conducting stem (12) by the sheets (15) which are elastic, contrarily to the corresponding rigid sheets of the “box” anodes. The anode is provided with a pair of constraint elements (17) that are installed inside the same anode so as to engage the ends of the elastic sheets (15). The constraint elements hold therefore the anode in the restrained position so that they substantially reduce the width (16) allowing a safe assemblage of the cell body on the conductive base. Once completed the assemblage, the constraint elements (17) are extracted releasing the ends of the elastic sheets (15), which can now freely expand hence pushing the surfaces of (13A) and (13B) toward the relevant facing diaphragm-bearing finger surfaces. The scope of this construction is to bring the anode and finger surfaces in direct contact so as to eliminate the voltage penalty that, as seen above, characterises the “box” anodes. The industrial practice has actually shown flat this ideal alignment is not achieved: the reasons for this situation are of various kinds, in particular being associated to a certain relaxation undergone by the elastic sheet material when the anode is held in the restrained position and to the need of keeping within reasonable limits the pressure exerted by the same sheets in the restrained position in order to allow an easy extraction of the constraint elements after the cell assemblage. In any case what is observed is that surfaces (13A) and (13B) of each anode are normally not in direct contact with the surface of the fingers, wherefrom they are positioned at a more or less reduced, but not null and, more importantly, non symmetrical distance. This lack of symmetry, which causes an irregularity in the electric current distribution, is generated by an inevitable variation in the span of the elastic sheets (15) due to differences of mechanical characteristics and of thickness, even if contained in the fabrication tolerances. From a practical standpoint all this prevents to eliminate completely the voltage penalty characterising the “box” anodes.
In the zones where the gap is lower, the span of the forcing elements is also loser and the pressure exerted on the diaphragm deposited on the fingers is higher.
The present invention is intended to solve the problems of the prior art through the use of externally adjustable forcing elastic elements compatible with the design of conventional expandable anodes. A first embodiment of the invention is presented in the axonometric views of
In particular, in
The mechanism for adjusting the span of the edges (27) is shown in detail in
The operation of the mechanism (20) is illustrated in
Upon completion of the adjustment procedure, which is dearly different from anode to anode depending on the position inside the cell and from cell to cell, the adjusting tool is extracted. It follows that the adjusting tool is not subject to the highly corrosive action of the cell fluid processes and therefore, in the choice of the construction material therefor, the mechanic characteristics, in particular the torque resistance, can be privileged: for example the low-alloy heat treatable chromium-nickel-molybdenum steels with an adequate thermal treatment are particularly fit.
It has to be observed that the span adjustment procedure may be repeated over time, for instance during plant maintenance, for example in order to compensate for diaphragm dimensional variations as it may happen with some types after specific operating periods.
The forcing elastic elements which, contrarily to the extractable tool, remain inserted in tee anodes with the relevant adjustment mechanisms, are subjected to the severe conditions of aggressiveness typical of chlor-alkali cell operation. In this case, titanium and some alloys thereof result to be the elected material for assembly construction.
For a better understanding of the second embodiment of the finding of the invention
As in the case of the first embodiment, also in the second embodiment the tool (33) is preferably extracted after completing the adjustment of the anode span in each cell of the plant and thus, being not subjected to the harsh operating conditions, it may be constructed with materials characterised only by high mechanic characteristics, such as for instance low-alloy steels: it is to be noted that the tool of the latter embodiment is however subjected to moderate mechanic solicitations and that in particular the torque stresses, typical of the former embodiment, are conversely absent.
Also in the second embodiment the forcing elastic elements and the relevant adjusting mechanisms must be of course preferably made of titanium or titanium alloys.
Various modifications of the device of the invention may be deviled by experts of the field without however departing from the spirit and the scopes of the invention itself which is intended to be limited only as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI2003A000106 | Jan 2003 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP04/00460 | 1/21/2004 | WO | 6/29/2005 |