In the completion of oil and gas wells, downhole tools are mounted on the end of a work string, such as a drill strings, a landing string, a completion string, or production string. The workstring can be any type of wellbore tubular, such as casing, liner, tubing, and the like. A common operation performed downhole temporarily obstructs the flow path within the wellbore to allow the internal pressure within a section of the workstring to be increased. In turn, the increased pressure operates hydraulically actuated tools. For example, a liner hanger can be hydraulically operated to hang a liner to well casing. In other examples, the increased pressure can hydraulically release a setting tool, washpipe, or a gravel pack inner string from a packer.
Sealably landing a ball on a ball seat provides a common way to temporarily block the flow path through a wellbore tubular so a hydraulic tool above the seat can be operated by an increase in pressure. Historically, segmented dogs or keys have been used create a ball seat for landing a ball. Alternatively, a hydro-trip mechanism can use collet fingers that deflect and create a ball seat for engaging a dropped ball. Segmented ball seats may be prone to fluid leakage and tend to require high pump rates to shear open the ball seat. Additionally, the segmented ball seat does not typically open to the full inner diameter of the downhole tubular so the ball seat may eventually need to be milled out with a milling operation.
Once the hydraulically actuated tool, such as a liner hanger or packer is actuated, operators want to remove the obstruction in the tubular's flow path. For example, operators will want to move the ball and seat out of the way. Various ways can be used to reopen the tubular to fluid flow.
In one example, with the ball landed on the seat, the increasing pressure above the ball seat eventually causes a shearable member holding the ball seat to shear, releasing the ball seat to move downhole with the ball. However, this may leave the ball and ball seat in the wellbore, potentially causing problems for subsequent operations.
In another way to reopen fluid flow through the tubular, increased pressure above the ball seat can eventually force the ball to deformably open the seat, which then allows the ball to pass through. In these designs, the outer diameter of the ball represents a maximum size of the opening that can be created through the ball seat. This potentially limits the size of subsequent equipment that can pass freely through the ball seat and further downhole without the risk of damage or obstruction.
Any of the hydraulic tools that are to be actuated and are located above the ball seat need to operate at a pressure below whatever pressure is needed to eventually open or release the ball seat. Internal pressures can become quite high when breaking circulation or circulating a liner through a tight section. To avoid premature operation of the tool at these times, the pressure required to open or release a ball seat needs to be high enough to allow for a sufficiently high activation pressure for the tool. For example, ball seats can be assembled to open or release at a predetermined pressure that can exceed 3000 psi.
Since the ball seat is a restriction in the wellbore, it must be opened up, moved out of the way, or located low enough in the well to not interfere with subsequent operations. Commonly, the ball seat is moved out of the way by having it drop down hole. Unfortunately, this may require the removal of both the ball and ball seat at a later time.
Ball seats may also be milled out of the tubular to reopen the flow path. For example, ball seats made of soft metals such as aluminum are easier to mill out; however, they may not properly seat the ball due to erosion caused by high volumes of drilling mud being pumped through the reduced diameter of the ball seat. Interference from the first ball seat being released downhole may also prevent the ball from sealably landing on another ball seat below.
One type of ball seat used in the art uses a collet-style mechanism that opens up in a radial direction when shifted past a larger diameter grove. However, these collet-style ball seats are more prone to leaking than a solid ball seats, and the open collet fingers exposed inside the tubular create the potential for damaging equipment used in subsequent wellbore operations.
The subject matter of the present disclosure is directed to overcoming, or at least reducing the effects of, one or more of the problems set forth above.
When operators wish to actuate the hydraulically actuated tool 20, for instance, an appropriately sized ball is dropped from the rig 14 to engage in the seat 32 of the downhole tool 30. With the ball engaged in the seat 32, operators use the pumping system 16 to increase the pressure in the wellbore tubular 12 uphole from the tool 30. In turn, the increase tubing pressure actuates an appropriate mechanism in the hydraulically actuated tool 20 uphole of the ball seat 32. For example, the tool 20 may be a hydraulically set packer that has a piston or sleeve that compresses a packing element in response to the increased tubing pressure.
Once the tool 20 is actuated, operators will want to reopen fluid communication downhole by moving the seated ball out of the way. Rather than milling out the ball and seat, the seat 32 of the present disclosure allows operators to drop the ball further downhole.
Turning now to more details of the downhole tool 30 having the expandable ball seat 32,
The downhole tool 30 includes an outer housing 40, which couples to sections of wellbore tubular (not shown) in a conventional manner, by threads, couplings, or the like. The housing 40 has upper and lower housing sections 44a-b that couple together for assembling the various internal components of the tool 30.
Inside the housing 40, the tool 30 has a mandrel 46 movably disposed in the bore 42 of the housing 40. The mandrel 46 defines another bore 48 therethrough and comprises first and second internal sleeves or mandrel sections 50 and 60. The tool 30 also includes a segmented seat 70 disposed in the housing's bore 42 between the mandrel sections 50 and 60. Finally, a piston 80 is movably disposed in an annular space 46 between the mandrel sections 50 and 60 and the housing 40, and a biasing element 58, such as a spring, biases the upper mandrel section 50 toward the segmented seat 70.
The upper mandrel section 50 defines an internal bore 52 with cross-ports 54 communicating outside the mandrel section 50 into the annular space 46. The lower mandrel section 60 defines fluid bypass ports 64 communicating the tool's annular space 46 with the section's bore 62. A shoulder 56 on the outside of the upper mandrel section 50 supports the spring 58.
In the run-in position shown in
Even though the ball B is seated, the applied pressure can communicate through the upper sections' cross-ports 54 and into the annular space 46 between the mandrel sections 50 and 60 and the housing 40. The applied pressure in th is space 46 can thereby act against the piston 80. Seals 82, such as O-rings, preferably seal the piston 80 inside the annular space 46 and engage inside the housing 40 and outside the mandrel section 60. This prevents premature flow from the annular space 46 past the sealed piston 80 and out the lower bypass ports 64 in the lower mandrel section 60.
As long as the applied pressure is less than the pressure needed to break the shear screws 84, the piston 80 remains in place and supports the segmented seat 70 constricted inward to support the ball B. At a predetermined pressure that is preferably higher than the actuating pressure of other tools, the applied pressure acting against the piston 80 breaks the shear screws 84.
As shown in
Because the seat 70 is no longer supported by the piston 80, the spring 58 forcing the upper mandrel section downward toward the seat 70 causes the seat to expand outward into the annular space 46. The triangular cross-section of the seat's segments 72 along with the angled ends or upper and lower cones of the mandrel sections 50 and 60 can facilitate this movement.
Previous embodiments have discussed using the segmented ball seat 70 in a downhole tool 30 that is separate from any hydraulically actuated tool 20 disposed on a wellbore tubular 12. In other embodiments, the segmented ball seat 70 can actually be incorporated into a hydraulically-actuated tool, such as a packer, a liner hanger, or the like. In fact, the segmented ball seat 70 can actually be used directly as a part of the hydraulically actuating mechanism of such a tool.
As one particular example, a sliding sleeve can incorporate the segmented ball seat of the present disclosure as part of its mechanism for hydraulically opening the sliding sleeve for fracture treatments or other operations. For instance,
A dropped ball B engages in the segmented ball seat 170 that is incorporated into the inner sleeve 120. Pressure applied against the seated ball B eventually shears a set of first shear pins 125 or other breakable connections that hold the inner sleeve 120 in place in the housing's bore 112. Now free to move, the inner sleeve 120 moves with the applied pressure in the bore 112 against a lower shoulder and exposes the housings ports 114, as shown in
When it is then desired to open the segmented ball seat 170, additional pressure applied against the seated ball B, such as during the elevated pressures of a fracture treatment, can eventually act through the cross-ports 154 in the upper mandrel section 150 and into the annular space 146 where the pressure can act against the piston 180. Eventually, when a predetermined pressure level is reached, the shear screws 184 or other breakable connections can break so that the applied pressure moves the piston 180. As before, without the support of the piston 180, the segmented seat 170 can expand outward to an expanded state by the pressure on the ball B, which is then released to pass out of the sliding sleeve 100, as shown in
In the above discussion, the shear pins 125 holding the sleeve 120 have a lower pressure setting than the shear pins 184 holding the seat's piston 180. This allows the sleeve 120 to open with pressure applied against the seat 170 while the seat's piston 180 remains in its initial state. Eventual pressure can then break the shear pins 184 for the piston 180 so the seat 170 can pass the ball B.
Although the external ports 114 for the sliding sleeve 100 are disposed uphole of the segmented ball seat 170 in
The foregoing description of preferred and other embodiments is not intended to limit or restrict the scope or applicability of the inventive concepts conceived of by the Applicants. For example, the segments 72 of the seat 70 have been disclosed as having a triangular cross-section because this shape can facilitate the wedging of the segments 72 into the annular space 46 when unsupported by the piston 80 and moved by the biased upper mandrel section 50. Other shapes could be used. Moreover, the seat 70 need not be composed of completely separate segments 72 as implied above. Instead, the seat 70 can be a continuous component that is generally expandable and constrictable to either open or close its internal diameter and the resulting restriction inside the tool. The seat 70 can be composed of any suitable material, including metal, cast iron, elastomer, etc.
In another example, although the piston 80 as disclosed above is temporarily connected to the lower mandrel section 60 with shear screws 84, other temporary connections can be used. For example, a frangible support may be disposed in the annular space 46 downhole of the piston 80 to support the piston 80 against an internal shoulder of the housing 40. Alternatively, the piston 80 can be temporarily connected to the housing 40 by shear screws or other connection. These and other variations will be appreciated with the benefit of the present disclosure.
In additional alternatives, rather than having a biasing element 158 bias the upper mandrel section 50 so it can expand out the seat 70 when the support of the piston 80 is removed, the seat 70 itself can having a biasing element or elements to expand the seat 70 outward. Yet, it is still preferred that the upper mandrel section 50 moves downhole with the expansion of the seat 70 as this helps hide the segmented seat 70 inside the tool 30 so the bores 52 and 62 of the mandrel sections 50 and 60 can complete the bore 42 of the housing 40.
It will be appreciated with the benefit of the present disclosure that features described above in accordance with any embodiment or aspect of the disclosed subject matter can be utilized, either alone or in combination, with any other described feature, in any other embodiment or aspect of the disclosed subject matter.
In exchange for disclosing the inventive concepts contained herein, the Applicants desire all patent rights afforded by the appended claims. Therefore, it is intended that the appended claims include all modifications and alterations to the full extent that they come within the scope of the following claims or the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3054415 | Baker et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
4099563 | Hutchison et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4520870 | Pringle | Jun 1985 | A |
4889199 | Lee | Dec 1989 | A |
5146992 | Baugh | Sep 1992 | A |
5244044 | Henderson | Sep 1993 | A |
5499687 | Lee | Mar 1996 | A |
5960884 | Echols | Oct 1999 | A |
6520257 | Allamon et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6634428 | Krauss et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6966368 | Farquhar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7322417 | Rytlewski et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7377321 | Rytlewski et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7416029 | Telfer et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8261761 | Gerrard et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8505639 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20030024706 | Allamon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040108109 | Allamon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20080093080 | Palmer et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20110030968 | Xu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110073321 | Fay et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110203800 | Tinker et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110240315 | McNeilly | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110278017 | Themig et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130025868 | Smith et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130048298 | Merron et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130161017 | King | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130284451 | Merron | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299199 | Naedler et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2100389 | Jan 1994 | CA |
2132406 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2375558 | Nov 2002 | GB |
2048226 | Nov 1995 | RU |
9947789 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report and Written Opinion in counterpart PCT Appl. PCT/US2014/023103, dated Feb. 20, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140251629 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |