Embodiments of the present invention relate to an archery expandable broadhead and, more particularly, to a through-the-body expandable broadhead having a steel or stainless steel body with an integrated machined tip.
Known through-the-body expandable broadheads can have a cut on contact tip with either an aluminum or titanium ferrule. The cut on contact tip consists of a sharpened double edged piece of steel inserted into the either aluminum or titanium ferrule body that is held in place with a threaded fastener. An example of such a broadhead is shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 8,197,367, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Through-the-body expandable broadheads can also have a chisel tip, in which chisel tip is pressed or otherwise conventionally secured into an aluminum ferrule. An example of such a broadhead is shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,540,628, which is incorporated herein by reference. While this offers some advantages over the cut on contact expandable broadheads, these tips generally lack to the sharpness and therefore cutting advantages from a cut on contact tip.
However, neither types of these broadheads have a tip that is machined as an integral part of a steel or stainless steel ferrule. There is a need for such a broadhead, as such a broadhead advantageously provides greater structural integrity than an insert steel blade, thereby making the head more durable on impact. Other advantages of a broadhead having a tip that is machined as an integral part of a steel or stainless steel ferrule will be apparent as described herein.
Embodiments of the present invention have a ferrule 102, 301 preferably made from steel or stainless steel, and an integral tip 104 that is machined as an integral part of the ferrule 102, 301. This aspect of the design of various embodiments of the present invention provides several advantages. First, an integral tip 104 provides greater structural integrity than conventional insert steel blades, thereby making the forward portion of the broadhead 100, 300 more durable on impact. A steel ferrule 102, 301 provides significant structural strength that cannot be obtained with aluminum.
Second, an integral tip 104 provides for highly repeatable “centering” of the broadhead 100, 300 so that its weight is symmetric about the longitudinal axis of the broadhead 100, 300. Broadheads with conventional steel insert blades that are inserted, for example, into an aluminum ferrule require a steel fastener to pinch the ferrule onto the tip to hold it in place. This requires some clearance for assembly, which allows for off-center positioning. Additionally, the steel fastener is not symmetric on both sides of centerline of the longitudinal axis, causing an off-center mass for the part. An integrated tip in accordance with embodiments of the present invention eliminates these concerns.
Third, because the integral tip 104 is self-supporting, it allows the design of the ferrule 102, 301 to be such that it has a narrower profile and therefore a greater penetrating capability than broadheads with conventional steel insert blades that are inserted into an aluminum ferrule.
Fourth, the integral tip 104 can be made with a profile that allow for a sharper point and therefore greater penetrating ability that could not otherwise be achieved while meeting the structural demands of the broadhead.
The integral tip 104 preferably includes a plurality of facets or flat regions 104a-c, as shown in
As shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the ferrules 102, 301 of the “through the body” expandable broadheads 100, 300 have a weight of 100 approximately grains. Steel alloys that could be used for the ferrule 102, 301 (and other elements, such as blades 204a, 204b) would include 4140, 4240, 43L40, 41L40, and many other high strength steels. Examples of stainless steel alloys that would be appropriate for the ferrule 102, 301 (and other elements, such as blades 204a, 204b) would be 420, 416, and 301 stainless.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/748,954, filed Jan. 4, 2013, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3824026 | Gaskins | Jul 1974 | A |
4212463 | Repinski et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
6077179 | Liechty, II | Jun 2000 | A |
6200237 | Barrie | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6258000 | Liechty, II | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6290903 | Grace, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306053 | Liechty, II | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322464 | Sestak | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6517454 | Barrie et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6540628 | Musacchia, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6595881 | Grace, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6626776 | Barrie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6887172 | Arasmith | May 2005 | B2 |
6910979 | Barrie et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7422533 | Johnson | Sep 2008 | B1 |
D583897 | Ward | Dec 2008 | S |
7771297 | Kuhn | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7951023 | Perkins, Jr. | May 2011 | B2 |
8197367 | Pulkrabek et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8210971 | Fulton | Jul 2012 | B1 |
RE44144 | Barrie et al. | Apr 2013 | E |
8545349 | Budris et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
20020055404 | Liechty | May 2002 | A1 |
20020151393 | Liechty | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20070037640 | Rager | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070161438 | Fulton | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080254925 | Odabachian et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100113196 | Jones | May 2010 | A1 |
20120165142 | Grace | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report (PCT Article 18 and Rules 43 and 44) for PCT/US2013/076119, Mar. 11, 2014. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (PCT Rule 43bis. 1) for PCT/US2013/076119, Mar. 11, 2014. |
PCT International Search Report (PCT Article 18 and Rules 43 and 44) for PCT/US2013/075782, Mar. 19, 2014. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (PCT Rule 43bis. 1) for PCT/US2013/075782, Mar. 19, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140194235 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61748954 | Jan 2013 | US |