The present invention generally relates to arrowheads for attachment to arrow shafts and, more particularly, to expandable broadhead arrowheads with chisel tips.
In an effort to develop ever-more effective equipment for hunting and other sports, the archery industry has developed a wide range of arrowhead styles that are intended and suited for specific uses. One such style of arrowhead is the broadhead, a bladed arrowhead featuring multiple sharp cutting blades that are designed to greatly increase the effective cutting area of the arrowhead. This increased cutting area results in larger, more effective entrance and exit wounds in game hit by the arrowhead, leading to quick and humane kills and better blood trails.
While broadheads provide an improved cutting capability in comparison with non-bladed arrowheads (known as field points or nib points), many broadhead designs suffer from inferior aerodynamic properties when compared to their non-bladed counterparts. Broadhead blades deployed during flight of an arrow can result in undesirable effects, causing that arrow to veer off course from the flight path coinciding with the longitudinal axis of the arrow shaft.
Previous broadhead designs have attempted to improve the aerodynamics of the bladed arrowheads by hiding a substantial portion of each of the cutting blades within the ferrule during flight of the arrow, in a design known as an “expandable broadhead.” Upon impacting a target, the blades are deployed, opening up and exposing the sharp cutting surfaces of the blades. Examples of such previous expandable broadhead designs are described by U.S. Pat. No. 8,197,367, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and are illustrated by the examples depicted in
The design 100 illustrated by
Previous designs for expandable broadheads have incorporated cut on contact tips similar to cut on contact tip 102 of broadhead 100.
Exemplary views of existing cut on contact tips are illustrated by
While the cut on contact tips utilized by previous expandable broadhead designs can easily penetrate the hide of a targeted game animal with a low expenditure of kinetic energy, a need remains for an expandable broadhead design that features a chisel tip. Durability is one advantage provided by a chisel-tipped expandable broadhead, as the leading edge of the broadhead is the location most likely to sustain impact damage. The dense, sculpted chisel tip reduces the broadhead's susceptibility to such impact damage, especially when striking hard structures such as bone.
In addition to the chisel tip's resistance to impact damage, its comparatively large, dense structure increases the amount of mass in the nose of the expandable broadhead. This increase in density moves the center of mass of the projectile upon which the broadhead is mounted further forward, improving the flight characteristics of that projectile. The aerodynamics of the projectile upon which a chisel tip broadhead is mounted can be further improved by incorporating a spiraling, helical design for the chisel tip. This helical design directs air flow around the ferrule body of the broadhead, leading to increased rotation of the broadhead projectile and reducing the effects of side winds in flight. The effects of the directed air flow created by the chisel tip stabilize the flight path of the projectile to improve its flight characteristics and lead to enhanced accuracy and precision of arrow shots.
Furthermore, a chisel tip mounted on an expandable broadhead can result in an increase in the effectiveness of the deployment of the rear deployed cutting blades. The deployment of the cutting blades works best when the leading blunt edges of the retracted blades strike the hide of the targeted game animal on impact. By offsetting the alignment of the chisel tip's cutting edges with the alignment of the rear deployed cutting blades, the chisel tip ensures that the blunt edges of the retracted blades strike the animal's hide, causing the retracted blades to effectively deploy and expose their sharp cutting edges.
As discussed above, there is a need for an expandable broadhead design featuring a chisel tip that provides increased resistance to damage, results in improved flight performance, and aids in the effectiveness of deploying the expandable broadhead's cutting blades. Embodiments of the present invention, as described below, solve the need in the art for such a device.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to expandable broadheads for attachment to arrow shafts. In one embodiment, the expandable broadhead includes a ferrule body that has a nose section and at least one blade recess, a chisel tip inserted into the nose section of the ferrule body, and a plurality of blades residing at least in part in the at least one blade recess. The plurality of blades can be configured in a retracted configuration or a deployed configuration, and a shock-absorbing retainer can be provided to releasably engage with the plurality of blades, to retain the blades in the retracted configuration until impact.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the ferrule body is composed of a material selected from the group consisting of aluminum, titanium, magnesium, and carbon-fiber reinforced polymer.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the chisel tip is made from a material selected from the group consisting of stainless steels, tool steels, carbides, titanium alloys, tungsten alloys, and tungsten carbides. In further embodiments of the invention, the chisel tip is coated with a material selected from the group consisting of nickel, zinc, cadmium, and black oxide.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the shock-absorbing retainer includes one or more devices selected from the group consisting of an O-ring and a collar.
In certain embodiments of the invention, each of the plurality of blades includes a cutting edge, and the cutting edge is exposed in the deployed configuration. In further embodiments of the invention, each of the plurality of blades includes a blunt edge, and the blunt edge is exposed in the retracted configuration.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the chisel tip is multi-faceted. In further embodiments of the invention, the number of facets of the chisel tip is a multiple of the number of the plurality of blades. In still further embodiments of the invention, the chisel tip is a three-facet chisel tip or a four-facet chisel tip, and the facets of the chisel tip are concave. In other further embodiments of the invention, the number of facets of the chisel tip is different than the number of blades.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the expandable broadhead further includes cutting edges between the facets of the chisel tip. In further embodiments of the invention, the cutting edges are helical blades. In further embodiments of the invention, the cutting edges of the chisel tip bisect the separation angles of the plurality of blades.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the expandable broadhead has a cutting diameter of about 1 inch to about 2.5 inches in diameter
In certain embodiments of the invention, the expandable broadhead has a weight of about 75 grains to about 150 grains.
Embodiments of the present invention pertain to and provide designs for expandable broadheads with chisel tips for attachment to arrow shafts.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention depicted by
In certain preferred embodiments of the present invention, the ferrule body 516 of the broadhead design 500 is a unitary molded or machined structure that includes various slots (such as shown in
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the rear section 509 of the ferrule body 516 includes threads 518 that couple with a conventional arrow shaft (not shown) or other projectile, such as a crossbow bolt. In certain embodiments, the nose section 507 of the ferrule body 516 may take a variety of forms, including but not limited to a conical, faceted, or a straight tapered structure. In a preferred embodiment, the nose section 507 of the ferrule body 516 includes one or more facets or flat regions 508. The facets 508 increase the aerodynamic stability of the expandable broadhead 500 during flight, and in certain embodiments, the number of facets 508 may vary in accordance with various broadhead design factors.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the ferrule body 516 includes one or more facets 508. The facets 508 can be either concave, convex, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the facets 508 are grooves or depressions arranged generally parallel to the longitudinal axis. In another embodiment, the facets 508 are ridges or protrusions. The facets 508 provide a number of functions, such as aerodynamics, stability of the expandable broadhead 500 as it penetrates a target, and the release of fluid pressure that may accumulate in front of the expandable broadhead 500.
The plurality of blades 504a and 504b of the present invention depicted in the exemplary broadhead design 500 can be referred to generically as cutting blades. In a preferred embodiment, the cutting blades 504a and 504b are rear deploying blades. As used herein, “rear deploying” refers to rearward translation of blades 504a and 504b generally along a longitudinal axis of the ferrule body 516 and outward movement of a rear portion of the blades 504a and 504b away from the longitudinal axis. The rearward translation can be linear, curvilinear, rotational or a combination thereof. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b are attached to the ferrule body 516 by a mechanism 510 that allows the blades 504a and 504b to move outward in a camming manner from the ferrule body 516 by a rearward translation that causes interaction between the ferrule body 516 and the blades 504a, 504b. In certain embodiments, the pivot feature 510 is a threaded fastener, including but not limited to a pin, which can be removed to permit replacement of the blades 504a and 504b.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the rear portion of a rear deploying blade 504a or 504b remains on the same side of a blade pivot axis in both the retracted and deployed configurations for the rear deploying blade 504a or 504b. An example of the movement of the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b is illustrated by U.S. Pat. No. 8,197,367, hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. The shock-absorbing retainer 514 assists in retaining the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b in the retracted configuration until impact.
In a preferred embodiment, as illustrated by
In one or more preferred embodiments of the present invention, in the retracted configuration of the plurality of rear deploying blades 504a and 504b, the blunt impact edge 506a and 506b is positioned exterior to the ferrule body 516. Each of the plurality of rear deploying blades 504a and 504b is releasably coupled to the shock-absorbing retainer 514 to retain the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b in the retracted configuration. When the impact edge 506a and 506b contacts an object, the blades 504a and 504b release from the retainer 514 and the blades 504a and 504b are displaced rearward. As the blades 504a and 504b move rearward, the blades 504a and 504b move from the retracted configuration to the deployed configuration through camming between the blades and ferrule body.
Different deployment configurations are desirable for a variety of reasons, such as, for example, the nature of the target or type of game being hunted. In one embodiment of the present invention, the threaded fastener 510 preferably used as the pivot feature on the present invention's expandable broadhead 500 permits quick and easy substitution of blades 504a and 504b having different deployment configurations. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to attach cutting blades having different deployment profiles to a single ferrule body 516.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the shock-absorbing retainer 514 is made from a resilient or elastomeric material that absorbs some of the impact force between the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b and the ferrule body 516 in the deployed configuration of the blades 504a and 504b. In the preferred embodiment, the shock absorbing properties of the retainer 514 reduces blade failure in the deployed configuration. In another embodiment, the retainer 514 plastically deforms upon impact of the cutting blades 504a and 504b. The diameter of the retainer 514 can be selected based on the degree of impact absorption required, the configuration of the cutting blades 504a and 504b, and other factors. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the retainer 514 can be constructed as a metal snap ring made from a softer metal than the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b. In another exemplary embodiment, the retainer 514 is constructed from a low surface friction material, such as, for example, nylon, HDPE (high-density polyethylene) or PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene), to facilitate blade deployment.
In certain preferred embodiments of the invention, different types of shock-absorbing retainers can be used in the expandable broadhead design, as illustrated by the exemplary embodiment 550 of the present invention depicted in
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the shock-absorbing retainer 514 is made from a polymeric material, and is used in conjunction with an O-ring to retain the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b in place during flight until impact. The polymeric material should be flexible enough to withstand normal handling without any breakage issues. Furthermore, the material must be flexible enough that it doesn't break when the retainer 514 is pushed into position during assembly. At the same time, the material of the retainer 514 should be brittle enough upon impact so that it releases the blades 504a and 504b in a rapid loading impact situation. The descriptive name for a material possessing these qualities is “strain rate sensitive.” In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the polymeric material is polypropylene.
The components of the expandable broadhead 500 can be manufactured using a variety of techniques. In one embodiment of the present invention, the ferrule body 516 and/or the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b are made using metal injection molding techniques. In another embodiment, the ferrule body 516 and/or the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b are manufactured using powder injection molding techniques. The powder mixtures used in either the metal injection molding or powder injection molding processes can include metals, ceramics, thermoset or thermoplastic resins, and composites thereof. Reinforcing fibers can optionally be added to the powder mixture.
In other embodiments of the present invention, the ferrule body 516 and/or the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b are made using other molding techniques, such as injection molding. The molding materials can include metals, ceramics, thermoset or thermoplastic resins, and composites thereof. Reinforcing fibers can optionally be added to the molding mixture. Suitable reinforcing fibers include glass fibers, natural fibers, carbon fibers, metal fibers, ceramic fibers, synthetic or polymeric fibers, composite fibers, or a combination thereof.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the ferrule body 516 is made from a material selected from the group consisting of aluminum, titanium, magnesium, and carbon-fiber reinforced polymer. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the ferrule body 516 is made from aluminum. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the ferrule body 516 is made from titanium.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the rear deploying blades 504a and 504b are cut from a sheet or blank of blade stock material. The blade stock material can be made from various different steels, including tool steels, stainless steels, high speed steel, carbon steels, carbides, titanium alloys, tungsten alloys, tungsten carbides, as well as other metals or any other suitable material that a cutting blade 504a or 504b could be fabricated from.
The expandable broadhead designs 500 and 550 of the present invention, as illustrated by
In certain preferred embodiments of the present invention, as depicted by the exemplary side view of expandable broadhead 600 in
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the chisel tip 700 or 730 can be made from various different steels, including tool steels (M-2, S-7, and D-2), stainless steels (301, 304, 410, 416, 420, 440A, 440B, 440C, 17-4 PH, 17-7 PH, 13C26, 19C27, G1N4 and other stainless steels), high speed steel, carbon steels, carbides, titanium alloys, tungsten alloys, tungsten carbides, as well as other metals. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the chisel tip 700 or 730 is made from stainless steel. The heightened density and weight of the larger steel structure of the chisel tip 700 or 730 in this embodiment, when compared to an aluminum or titanium (materials which are more lightweight and less dense than steel) ferrule body, leads to a center of mass on the projectile that has greater forward of center properties. Increasing the mass forward of center on a projectile is a well-established method of improving the flight characteristics of that projectile.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the chisel tip 700 or 730 can be coated with a material selected from the group consisting of nickel, zinc, cadmium, and black oxide. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the chisel tip 700 or 730 is coated with nickel. The tip can also be coated with a friction reducing coating such as a PTFE impregnated ceramic or fluoropolymer, PVD (physical vapor deposition) or CVD (chemical vapor deposition) ceramic type coating.
As illustrated by the exemplary embodiments displayed in
In addition to the helical design pattern illustrated by the exemplary embodiments displayed in
Various embodiments of the present invention have varying numbers of cutting blades as well as different numbers of facets on the chisel tip. However, in preferred embodiments of the present invention, the number of facets of the chisel tip is a multiple of the number of cutting blades of the expandable broadhead.
For example, in a preferred embodiment, an expandable broadhead with two cutting blades would be tipped with a chisel tip with two, four, six, etc. facets. Such a preferred embodiment is illustrated by
In the preferred embodiments of the present invention, in which the number of facets of the chisel tip is a multiple of the number of cutting blades, by controlling the rotational angle of insertion of the chisel tip relative to the principal axes of the ferrule body, the facets of the chisel point can be positioned so that the cutting edges between the facets provide a complementary set of cutting edges to the primary cutting blades of the expandable broadhead. As illustrated by the exemplary view of the expandable broadhead design 1020 depicted in
The complementary positioning of the chisel tip's cutting edges in relation to the cutting blades of the expandable broadhead in the preferred embodiments of the invention leads to several unique performance enhancements over previous expandable broadhead designs. The complementary placement of the chisel tip's cutting edges in relation to the cutting blades leads to a greater number of incisions made by the expandable broadhead, leading to maximum effectiveness in cutting.
Furthermore, deployment of the cutting blades works best when the leading blunt edges of those retracted blades strike the hide of a targeted game animal on impact. By offsetting the alignment of the chisel tip's cutting edges with the alignment of the rear deployed cutting blades, the preferred embodiments ensure that the blunt edges of the retracted blades strike uncut portions of the animal's hide, causing the retracted blades to effectively deploy and expose their sharp cutting edges.
In addition to the functional improvements of the chisel tip, in a preferred embodiment, the contours of the chisel tip are arranged and configured to flow into adjoining contours of the ferrule body, creating an aesthetically pleasing design.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the expandable broadhead has a cutting diameter of about 1 inch to about 2.5 inches in diameter, when the blades are in an expanded position. In a preferred embodiment, the expandable broadhead has a cutting diameter of about 2 inches, when the blades are in an expanded position. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the expandable broadhead has a cutting diameter of about 1.5 inches, when the blades are in an expanded position.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the expandable broadhead has a weight of about 75 grains to about 150 grains. In a preferred embodiment, the expandable broadhead has a weight of about 100 grains. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the expandable broadhead has a weight of about 125 grains.
The following Examples are only illustrative. It will be readily seen by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention fulfills all of the objectives set forth above. After reading the foregoing specification, one of ordinary skill will be able to effect various changes, substitutions of equivalents, and various other embodiments of the invention as broadly disclosed therein. It is therefore intended that the protection granted herein be limited only by the definition contained in the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
An expandable broadhead 1100 with a chisel tip 1102 as illustrated by
An expandable broadhead 1200 with a chisel tip 1202 as illustrated by
An expandable broadhead 1300 as illustrated by
An expandable broadhead 1400 as illustrated by
An expandable broadhead 1500 as illustrated by
An expandable broadhead 1600 as illustrated by
An expandable broadhead 1700 as illustrated by
An expandable broadhead 1800 as illustrated by
This application is a continuation, and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120, of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/792,989, filed Mar. 11, 2013, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/740,008, filed Dec. 20, 2012, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3824026 | Gaskins | Jul 1974 | A |
4212463 | Repinski et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
6077179 | Liechty, II | Jun 2000 | A |
6200237 | Barrie | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6258000 | Liechty, II | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6290903 | Grace, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306053 | Liechty, II | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322464 | Sestak | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6517454 | Barrie et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6540628 | Musacchia, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6595881 | Grace, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6626776 | Barrie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6887172 | Arasmith | May 2005 | B2 |
6910979 | Barrie et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6966856 | Hajek | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7422533 | Johnson | Sep 2008 | B1 |
D583897 | Ward | Dec 2008 | S |
7771297 | Kuhn | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7951023 | Perkins, Jr. | May 2011 | B2 |
8197367 | Pulkrabek et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8210971 | Fulton | Jul 2012 | B1 |
RE44144 | Barrie et al. | Apr 2013 | E |
8545349 | Budris et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
D710962 | Pedersen | Aug 2014 | S |
D711489 | Pedersen | Aug 2014 | S |
8986141 | Pedersen | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9068806 | Pedersen | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20020055404 | Liechty | May 2002 | A1 |
20020151393 | Liechty | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20070037640 | Rager | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070161438 | Fulton | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080254925 | Odabachian et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100113196 | Jones | May 2010 | A1 |
20120165142 | Grace | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report (PCT Article 18 and Rules 43 and 44) for PCT/US2013/076119, Mar. 11 2014. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (PCT Rule 43bis.1) for PCT/US2013/076119, Mar. 11, 2014. |
PCT International Search Report (PCT Article 18 and Rules 43 and 44) for PCT/US2013/075782, Mar. 19, 2014. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (PCT Rule 43bis.1) for PCT/US2013/075782, Mar. 19, 2014. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/075782, Jun. 23, 2015. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/076119, Jul. 7, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150168113 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61740008 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13792989 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14626035 | US |