The present invention relates to an improved expandable broadhead with rear deploying blades. The rear deploying blades have an in-flight retracted configuration and an expanded deployed configuration upon striking a target.
In the archery industry, many manufacturers have attempted to simultaneously achieve an arrowhead that has aerodynamic properties similar to those associated with non-bladed arrowheads known as field points or nib points, while also achieving effective cutting areas provided by bladed arrowheads, which are often referred to as broadheads. Broadhead blades which are exposed during flight often result in undesirable steering of the front portion of the arrow, causing the arrow to deviate from a perfect flight path that coincides with a longitudinal axis of the arrow shaft, when loaded or drawn within an archery bow.
By reducing the surface area of a broadhead blade, the undesirable steering effects can be reduced. However, by reducing the surface area of a blade, the cutting area within a target or game is also reduced, resulting in a less effective entrance and exit wound.
Conventional blade-opening arrowheads have been designed so that a substantial portion of the blade is hidden within the body of the arrowhead, such as during flight of the arrow. Upon impact, such blades are designed to open and thereby expose a cutting surface or sharp edge of the blade. When the blades of such conventional arrowheads are closed and substantially hidden within the body, the exposed surface area is reduced and thus produces relatively less undesirable steering effects.
Many of such conventional blade-opening arrowheads rely upon complex mechanisms, some of which fail to open reliably because of a significant holding or closing force that must be overcome, and others that open prematurely because of structural deficiencies within the blade carrying body that fail upon impact, resulting in non-penetration of the arrow. With such relatively complex mechanisms, dirt or other materials that may enter such conventional arrowheads can affect the reliability of the arrowhead, particularly after prolonged use. Examples of such mechanisms are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,112,063, 4,998,738 and 5,082,292. The deployable cutting blades are connected by pivot features to a plunger. The cutting blades pivot between an open cutting position and a closed non-barbed position. U.S. Pat. No. 5,102,147 discloses a ballistic broadhead assembly that has blades pivotally mounted on an actuating plunger. Upon impact, the actuating plunger thrusts the blades outwardly and forwardly.
Other conventional broadheads which have blades partially hidden within the body use annular retaining rings, such as O-rings, wraps, bands and the like, in order to maintain the blades in a closed position during flight. Upon impact, such annular retaining rings are designed to sheer or roll back along the opening blades, in order to allow the blades to move to an open position. Quite often, such conventional annular retaining rings are prone to cracking, particularly when the elastomer material dries out. Upon release of a bowstring, the rapid acceleration and thus significant opening forces move the blades in an opening direction. The conventional annular retaining rings counteract such opening forces. However, when the ring material dries out, cracks or is otherwise damaged, the blades may open prematurely, resulting in significant danger or injury to the archer.
Many of the annular retaining rings are designed for one use and thus must be replaced after each use. In addition to the cost involved with supplying such consumable item, the annular retaining rings are difficult and time-consuming to install, such as when hunting, particularly during inclement weather. Furthermore, the material properties of such conventional annular retaining rings can be affected by temperature changes, thereby resulting in different bias forces that cause the blade to open prematurely or to not open when desired.
One class of mechanical broadheads deploy the blades in an over-the-top motion, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,090,709. The extendable blades are pivotally connected to a body near the rear of the broadhead body. A ring releasably holds the extendable blades within corresponding slots within the body.
High-speed photography of over-the-top broadheads shows that the blades often do not fully open until after the blades enter the target. Consequently, the full cutting diameter of an over-the-top broadhead is often not available through the depth of the target. Also, as illustrated in
The present invention is directed to an improved expandable broadhead with rear deploying blades. The rear deploying blades deploy reliably upon impact of the blades with the target. The present expandable broadhead resists deflection by the target regardless of the angle of entry. Consequently, the present expandable broadhead maximizes kinetic energy on impact and increases the probability of substantial penetration into the target.
The rear end 56 preferably includes threads 58 that couple with a conventional arrow shaft. In the illustrated embodiment, the penetrating end 54 includes a tip blade 60 attached to the broadhead body 52 by fastener 62. The illustrated fastener 62 is adapted to receive a hex-shaped tool, that can optionally be provided to permit easy replacement of the tip blade 60, such as for example the tools disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,684,741, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In an alternate embodiment, the penetrating end may take a variety of other forms, such as for example conical, faceted, or a straight tapered structure, with or without the tip blade 60. In another embodiment, the penetrating end 54 is formed with the broadhead body 52 as a unitary structure.
The penetrating end 54 of the broadhead body 52 preferably includes a plurality of facets or flat regions 64. In the illustrated embodiment, the broadhead body 52 includes six facets 64. It is believed that the facets 64 increase the aerodynamic stability of the expandable broadhead 50 during flight. The number of facets 64 can vary with broadhead design and other factors.
The broadhead body 52 includes one or more slots 70 adapted to receive one or more rear deploying blades 72A, 72B (referred to collectively as “72”). The rear deploying blades of the present invention can also be referred to generically as cutting blades, as distinguished from a tip blade. In the illustrated embodiment, a single slot 70 receives both of the rear deploying blades 72. The rear deploying blades 72 are slidably engaged with the broadhead body 52. In the preferred embodiment, the blades 72 are pivotally attached to the broadhead body 52 by pivot feature 76, such as the pin illustrated in
As used herein, “rear deploying” means rearward translation of blades generally along a longitudinal axis of a broadhead body and outward movement of a rear portion of the blade way from the longitudinal axis. The rearward translation can be linear, curvilinear, rotational or a combination thereof.
In a rear deploying system the rear portion of the blade typically remains on the same side of a blade pivot axis in both the retracted and deployed configurations. An example of the movement of a rear deploying blade is illustrated in
In the embodiment of
The tip blade 60 has maximum width 61, which is typically less than maximum width 63 of the blades 72 in the retracted configuration 80. In one embodiment, the maximum width 61 is greater than the maximum width 63. In the illustrated embodiment, the maximum width 63 of the blades 72 is near the rear portion 94, but may be in other locations, such as for example near the penetrating edges 82.
In one embodiment, the broadhead body 52 optionally includes one or more elongated features 146. The elongated features 146 can be either concave, convex, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the features 146 are grooves or depressions arranged generally parallel to the longitudinal axis 120. In another embodiment, the features 150 are ridges or protrusions. The features 146 are believed to provide a number of functions, such as aerodynamics, stability of the expandable broadhead 50 as it penetrates a target, and the release of fluid pressure that may accumulate in front of the expandable broadhead 50. As will be illustrated in
The rear deploying blades 72 of
In the illustrated embodiment, the rear deploying blades 72 include slot 100 that extends proximate the impact edge 82 towards the camming edge 92. The slot 100 includes first end 102, a center portion 108, and second end 104. In the embodiment illustrated in
Center portion 108 of the slot 100 preferably has a width 110 greater than the diameter 106, and hence, the width 110 is greater than the maximum diameter of the pivot feature 76. The width 110 preferably defines a free floating region 109 that the pivot feature 76 can theoretically traverse without contacting sidewalls 111 of the slot 100. The free floating region 109 minimizes friction and deflection forces during deployment of the blades 72. As used herein, “free floating region” refers to a portion of a slot/pivot feature interface in which the gap between the pivot feature and side walls of the slot is greater than the gap between the pivot feature and at least one end of the slot. In the embodiments in which the pivot feature has a non-circular cross-section, the maximum cross-sectional dimension of the pivot feature is substituted for diameter.
The rear deploying blades 72 of
In the illustrated embodiment, the camming edge 92 has a slightly concave curvature 114 and length 116. Alternate camming edge configurations are discussed below. The length 116 of the camming edge 92 is corresponds to length 118 of slot 100. In one embodiment, the length 116 of the camming edge 92 plus the diameter of the pivot feature 76 is approximately equal to the length 118 of the slot 100. Alternatively, the travel distance of the pivot feature 76 in the slot 100 is approximately equal to the length of the camming edge 92.
In the preferred embodiment, during blade deployment the retainer 86 reaches the transition region 126 just before the pivot feature 76 engages the first end 102 of the slot 100. The retainer passes the transition region 126 and enters the deployment region 98 when the pivot feature 76 engages the first end 102 of the slot 100. This configuration releasably secured in the blade 72 in the deployed configuration 130 by simultaneous engagement of the pivot feature 76 with the first end 102 of the slot 100 and the engagement of the deployment region 98 with the retainer 86.
As will be discussed in detail below, the shape of the curvature 114 and the shape of the slot 100 determine the rate and angle at which the blades 72 move from the retracted configuration 80 to the deployed configuration 130. Consequently, the shape of the slot 100 and the camming edge 92 can be engineered to create a variety of deployment profiles. As used herein, “deployment profile” refers to the path traversed by a blade from a retracted configuration to a deployed configuration.
Upon impact, the penetrating end 54 proceeds into the object. As the retractable broadhead 50 advances into the object, the impact edges 82 also contact the object. Because the impact edges 82 extend beyond the perimeter of the broadhead body 52, movement of the expandable broadhead 50 into the object causes generally oppositely directed forces 124 to act on the impact edges 82.
In the illustrated embodiment, the impact edges 82 are angled slightly backward relative to axis 119 perpendicular to longitudinal axis 120. Consequently, forces 124 applied to the impact edges 82 generate torque 134 on the blades 72 that assists in releasing the notches 96 from the retainer 86. In an alternate embodiment, the impact edges 82 extend perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 120. The forces 124 acting on the impact edges 82 at a distance from the longitudinal axis 120 is sufficient to deploy the blades 72.
As best illustrated in
The retainer 86 is positioned in between the deployment regions 98 located along the rear edges of the blades 72 and the broadhead body 52. In the preferred embodiment, the retainer 86 is a resilient or elastomeric material that absorbs some of the impact force between the blades 72 and the broadhead body 52 in the deployed configuration 130 illustrated in
The retainer 86, broadhead body 52 and blades 72 can be made from a variety of materials, such as polymeric materials, metals, ceramics, and composites thereof. The Durometer of the retainer 86 can be selected based on the degree of impact absorption required, the configuration of the blades 72, and the like. For example, the retainer 86 can be constructed as a metal snap ring made from a softer metal than the blades 72. In another embodiment, the retainer 86 is constructed from a low surface friction material, such as for example nylon, to facilitate blade deployment.
The blades 72 of
The blades 72 of
In the illustrated embodiment, the non-cylindrical pivot feature 708 holds the blades 714 in the deployed configuration 710 without direct contact with the retainer 716 or the broadhead body 718. The deployed configuration 710 includes gap 722 between the blades 714 and the retainer 716. The cantilevered configuration illustrated in
In another embodiment of the broadhead 700, blades 714 engage with retainer 716 in the deployed configuration 710, such as illustrated in
The broadhead body 252 of
In the retracted configuration 280, impact edges 282A, 282B, 282C (referred to collectively as “282”) of the rear deploying blades 272, respectively, are positioned exterior to the broadhead body 252. Retainer 286 assisted retaining the rear deploying blades 272 in the retracted configuration 280.
In the illustrated embodiment, broadhead body 252 optionally includes elongated features 346 arranged in a helix or coil configuration around the broadhead body 52. The elongated features 346 can be either concave, convex, or a combination thereof.
In the illustrated embodiment, the rear deploying blades 272 include slot 300 that extends proximate the impact edge 282 towards the camming edge 292. The slot 300 includes first end 302, center portion 308, and second end 304. In the embodiment illustrated in
The camming edge 292 has a slightly concave curvature 314 and a length 316. The shape of the curvature 314 and the shape of the slot 300 determine the rate and angle at which the blades 272 move from the retracted configuration 280 to the deployed configuration 330. Alternate examples of camming edges are discussed below. In order to fit the three blades 272 in the broadhead body 252 without exceeding optimal weight, the blades 272 and the broadhead body 254 are typically shorter than the blades 72. The length 316 of the camming edge 292 is also shorter than the camming edge 116 illustrated in
Deployment Profile
As discussed above, the shape of the slots of the camming edges can be modified to change the angle of blade deployment and the rate of blade deployment.
The various blade slots illustrated in
Generally, longer camming edges and corresponding longer slots result in a deployment profile where the blades more closely follows the longitudinal axis of the broadhead body before moving outward away from the longitudinal axis. Alternatively, shorter camming edges and shorter slots result in a deployment profile where the blades move outward away from the longitudinal axis more quickly. Expandable broadheads with longer slots are generally less likely to fail during deployment. Essentially infinite variation is possible.
The broadhead body 506 includes one or more generally T-shaped slots 520 adapted to receive the rear deploying blades 502.
In the retracted configuration 504, impact edge 530 is positioned exterior to the broadhead body 506. Notch 532 on the blade 522 is releasably coupled to retainer 534 to retain the rear deploying blade 522 in the retracted configuration 504. When the impact edge 530 contacts an object, the notch 532 releases from the retainer 534 and the blades 502 are displaced rearward generally in direction 536. As the blades 502 move rearward, camming edge 538 rides on the retainer 534, causing the blades 502 to move from the retracted configuration 504 to a deployed configuration.
The pivot feature 524 preferably has a diameter close to width 540 of the first end 542 of the slot 520. The slots 520 preferably include a free floating region 544. The second end 546 optionally includes the same width 540 as the first end 542.
The camming edge 538 and the location of the protrusion 524 can be changed to modify the deployment profile of the blade 502, as discussed herein. In the preferred embodiment, the retainer 534 is a resilient or elastomeric material that absorbs some of the impact force that occurs during deployment of the blades 502. The blades 502 are replaced by removing the broadhead body 506 from the arrow shaft 512, thereby exposing the second ends 546 of the slots 520.
Different deployment profiles are desirable for a variety of reasons, such as for example the nature of the target or game being hunted. The threaded fastener preferably used as the pivot feature on the present expandable broadheads permit quick and easy substitution of blades having different deployment profiles. An alternate blade substitution system is illustrated in
In addition to engineering the deployment profiles, the manufacturing techniques discussed herein permit an infinite variety of cutting edge shapes on the blades.
Because the blades 652, 654 do not deploy, the practice broadhead 650 is easy to remove from a practice target. Wear and tear on the actual expandable broadhead 50 is avoided. The flight characteristics of the practice broadhead 650, however, are substantially the same as the expandable broadhead 50. Consequently, the user can gain experience using the practice broadhead 650 that directly corresponds to use of the expandable broadhead 50. While a molded version of the practice broadhead 650 may not be identical in shape to the expandable broadhead 50, the flight characteristics and weight are substantially the same.
In another embodiment, the practice broadhead 650 is the broadhead 50 illustrated in
In yet another embodiment, fastener 662 is engaged with broadhead body 656 to secure the blades 652, 654 in the retracted configuration 668 in a practice broadhead mode. Once the fastener 662 is removed, the practice broadhead 650 operates in a rear deploying mode as discussed in connection with the expandable broadhead 50. Consequently, a single structure can be switched from the practice broadhead 650 to the expandable broadhead 50 simply by inserting or removing the fastener 662.
In the illustrated embodiment, the broadhead body 802 is molded around tip blade 804. Tip blade 804 preferably includes one or more features 806, such as for example cut-out. The polymer preferably flows through the cut-out 806 during the injection molding process to strengthen the attachment to the broadhead body 802. In an alternate embodiment, the features 806 can be a raised structure or protrusion around which the polymeric material flows during molding. Tip blade 804 is preferably made from metal, such as for example stainless steel. Although the present application is directed primarily to expandable broadheads with rear deploying blades, the present broadhead body 802 molded around tip blade 804 is applicable to any type of fixed or expandable broadhead, such as for example the broadheads illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,306,053 and 6,743,128 (Liechty).
As best illustrated in
As illustrated in
The surface 816 preferably extends along a portion of the broadhead body 802 and onto member 818. The member 818 is preferably a metal ring that protects the arrow shaft (see
In an alternate embodiment, the pivot feature 914 has a diameter greater than the width of cut-outs 910. The portions of the blades 908 on either side of the cut-out 910 preferably flex to permit the pivot feature 914 to be engaged with, and disengaged from, the slot 906. In another embodiment, pivot feature 914 has a non-cylindrical cross-sectional shape (see e.g.,
In the retracted configuration 902, pivot feature 914 is preferably located closer to penetrating end 916 than the cut-out 910 to minimize interference between the cut-out 910 and the pivot feature 914 during deployment. In the illustrated embodiment, notches 920 on the blades 908 engage with retainer 922. Upon impact with an object, impact edges 924 force the blades 908 rearward in direction 926. The pivot feature 914 slides freely generally in the direction 926 in the slot 906. The slot 906 preferably includes a free-floating region.
Manufacturing precision blades for expandable broadheads has traditionally been a time consuming and expensive process. The present invention contemplates flexible manufacturing techniques that permits a wide variety of blade shapes and deployment profiles at low cost. In one embodiment, the blades are cut from a sheet or blank of blade stock material. In one preferred embodiment, the blade stock material is a strip of pre-sharpened and/or pre-tempered material, reducing or eliminating the need to sharpen the blade blanks. The blades are preferably made from the blade stock material by laser cutting, electro-discharge machining, water-jet cutting, and other similar techniques that are adaptable to computer control. These computer controlled processes permit the blade shape to be changed essentially instantaneously.
The blade stock material can be made from various different steels, including tool steels; M-2, S-7 & D-2, stainless steels; such as 301, 304, 410, 416, 420, 440A, 440B, 440C, 17-4 PH, 17-7 PH, 13C26, 19C27, G1N4, & other razor blade stainless steels, high speed steel, carbon steels, carbides, titanium alloys, tungsten alloys, tungsten carbides, as well as other metals, ceramics, zirconia ceramics, organic polymers, organic polymer containing materials, plastics, glass, silicone containing compounds, composites, or any other suitable material that a cutting blade or equivalent could be fabricated from, or could be at least in part fabricated from. Various blade manufacturing techniques are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,128 (Liechty) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,939,258 (Muller), which are hereby incorporated by reference.
In one embodiment, the broadhead body or practice broadhead is a unitary molded or machined structure that includes various slots, facets, threads and the like. In an alternate embodiment, the broadhead body or practice broadhead may include a plurality of components that are assembled.
The practice broadhead and the components of the present expandable broadhead can be manufactured using a variety of techniques. In one embodiment, the practice broadhead, broadhead body and/or the rear deploying blades are made using metal injection molding (hereinafter “MIM”) techniques, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,290,903 (Grace et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 6,595,881 (Grace et al.); and U.S. Pat. No. 6,939,258 (Muller), which are hereby incorporated by reference. In another embodiment, the practice broadhead, broadhead body and/or the rear deploying blades are made using powder injection molding (hereinafter “PIM”) techniques, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,749,801 (Grace et al.), which is hereby incorporated by reference. The powder mixtures used in either the MIM or PIM processes can include metals, ceramics, thermoset or thermoplastic resins, and composites thereof. Reinforcing fibers can optionally be added to the powder mixture.
In another embodiment, the practice broadhead, broadhead body and/or the rear deploying blades are made using other molding techniques, such as injection molding and the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,137,282 (Segar et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,739,991 (Wardropper), which are hereby incorporated by reference. The molding materials can include metals, ceramics, thermoset or thermoplastic resins, and composites thereof. In one embodiment, the broadhead body is molded from the polymers IXEF or AMODEL available from Solvay Advanced Polymers, reinforced by about 30% to about 60% by volume glass or carbon fibers.
Reinforcing fibers can optionally be added to the molding mixture. In one embodiment, the practice broadhead and/or broadhead body are made of carbon fiber reinforced polymers.
Reinforcing fibers can optionally be added to the mixture. Suitable reinforcing fibers include glass fibers, natural fibers, carbon fibers, metal fibers, ceramic fibers, synthetic or polymeric fibers, composite fibers (including one or more components of glass, natural materials, metal, ceramic, carbon, and/or synthetic components), or a combination thereof. In another embodiment, the reinforcing fibers include at least one polymeric component.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/533,998, entitled Expandable Broadhead with Rear Deploying Blades, filed Sep. 21, 2006 (Allowed), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/822,873 entitled Expandable Broadhead with Rear Deploying Blades, filed Aug. 18, 2006, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2212345 | Krieger | Aug 1940 | A |
2289284 | Chandler | Jul 1942 | A |
2568417 | Steinbacher | Sep 1951 | A |
2684852 | Romeka | Jul 1954 | A |
2816765 | Stockfleth | Dec 1957 | A |
2859970 | Doonan | Nov 1958 | A |
2925278 | Sweetland | Feb 1960 | A |
2939708 | Scheib | Jun 1960 | A |
2940758 | Richter | Jun 1960 | A |
3000635 | Nieman | Sep 1961 | A |
3036395 | Nelson | May 1962 | A |
3138383 | McKinzie | Jun 1964 | A |
3527463 | Turner | Sep 1970 | A |
3578328 | Rickey | May 1971 | A |
3618948 | McGlocklin | Nov 1971 | A |
3653664 | Gentellalli | Apr 1972 | A |
3672677 | Moore | Jun 1972 | A |
3738657 | Cox | Jun 1973 | A |
3741542 | Karbo | Jun 1973 | A |
3756600 | Maleski | Sep 1973 | A |
3759519 | Palma | Sep 1973 | A |
3854723 | Wilson | Dec 1974 | A |
3893866 | Hollingsworth | Jul 1975 | A |
3910579 | Sprandel | Oct 1975 | A |
3915455 | Savora | Oct 1975 | A |
4006901 | Simo | Feb 1977 | A |
4029319 | Christen | Jun 1977 | A |
4036499 | Sherwin | Jul 1977 | A |
4099720 | Zeren | Jul 1978 | A |
4141554 | Sherwin | Feb 1979 | A |
4146226 | Sorensen | Mar 1979 | A |
4166619 | Bergmann et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4203601 | Simo | May 1980 | A |
4210330 | Kosbab | Jul 1980 | A |
4254958 | Bateman, III | Mar 1981 | A |
4341391 | Anderson | Jul 1982 | A |
4381866 | Simo | May 1983 | A |
4405133 | Cartwright, Jr. | Sep 1983 | A |
4410184 | Anderson | Oct 1983 | A |
4452460 | Adams | Jun 1984 | A |
4529208 | Simo | Jul 1985 | A |
4558868 | Musacchia | Dec 1985 | A |
4565377 | Troncoso, Jr. et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4576589 | Kraus et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4579348 | Jones | Apr 1986 | A |
4601710 | Moll | Jul 1986 | A |
4615529 | Vocal | Oct 1986 | A |
4616835 | Trotter | Oct 1986 | A |
4643435 | Musacchia | Feb 1987 | A |
4676512 | Simo | Jun 1987 | A |
4742637 | Musacchia | May 1988 | A |
4807889 | Johnson | Feb 1989 | A |
4932671 | Anderson, Jr. | Jun 1990 | A |
4940246 | Stagg | Jul 1990 | A |
4973060 | Herzing | Nov 1990 | A |
4998738 | Puckett | Mar 1991 | A |
5046744 | Eddy | Sep 1991 | A |
5066021 | Delucia | Nov 1991 | A |
5078407 | Carlston et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5082292 | Puckett et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5083798 | Massey | Jan 1992 | A |
5090709 | Johnson | Feb 1992 | A |
5100143 | Puckett | Mar 1992 | A |
5112063 | Puckett | May 1992 | A |
D326889 | Garoutte | Jun 1992 | S |
5172916 | Puckett | Dec 1992 | A |
5178398 | Eddy | Jan 1993 | A |
D342303 | Johnson | Dec 1993 | S |
5286035 | Ward | Feb 1994 | A |
5322297 | Smith | Jun 1994 | A |
5372588 | Farley et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
D363108 | Johnson | Oct 1995 | S |
5458341 | Forrest et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5472213 | Dudley | Dec 1995 | A |
D370246 | Johnson | May 1996 | S |
5564713 | Mizek et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
D385327 | Delmonte | Oct 1997 | S |
5803844 | Anderson | Sep 1998 | A |
5803845 | Anderson | Sep 1998 | A |
5820498 | Maleski | Oct 1998 | A |
5857930 | Troncoso | Jan 1999 | A |
5879252 | Johnson | Mar 1999 | A |
5941784 | Mizek | Aug 1999 | A |
6015357 | Rizza | Jan 2000 | A |
6077179 | Liechty, II | Jun 2000 | A |
6200237 | Barrie | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6258000 | Liechty, II | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270435 | Sodaro | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283880 | Barrie | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6428433 | Liechty, II | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6428434 | Liechty, II | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6554727 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558280 | Kuhn | May 2003 | B1 |
6595881 | Grace, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6626776 | Barrie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6669586 | Barrie et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684741 | Blackston | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695726 | Kuhn | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695727 | Kuhn | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6743128 | Liechty, II | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6830523 | Kuhn | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6910979 | Barrie et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918848 | Kuhn | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6935976 | Grace, Jr. et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7234220 | Grace, Jr. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7771298 | Pulkrabek | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010006916 | Liechty, II | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010036876 | Barrie et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020055404 | Liechty, II | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065155 | Liechty, II | May 2002 | A1 |
20020098926 | Liechty, II | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030004021 | Barrie et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030073525 | Liechty, II | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030153417 | Barrie et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100273588 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60822873 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11533998 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12828832 | US |