Expandable fracture plug seat apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10132134
  • Patent Number
    10,132,134
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 12, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 20, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
An annular seat structure, for use in subterranean well stimulation operations, is operative in conjunction with associated expansion control structure to permit a predetermined number of fracture plug members to axially pass therethrough. In an illustrated embodiment thereof, the annular seat structure is movable between a retracted position having a first interior diameter, and a resiliently expanded position having a second, larger interior diameter. The seat structure has an annular array of rigid ring segments interdigitated with annular gaps that receive radially outwardly projecting portions of an annular resilient liner secured to radially inner surfaces of the rigid ring segments, the outwardly projecting liner portions being secured to circumferentially facing surfaces of the rigid ring segments. An annular spring member coaxially circumscribes the rigid ring segment array, is received in notches formed in the rigid segments, and resiliently biases the seat structure toward its retracted position.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention generally relates to subterranean well fracturing operations and, in representatively illustrated embodiments thereof, more particularly relates to specially designed expandable fracture plug seat structures and associated apparatus for operatively supporting them downhole and selectively permitting and precluding expansion thereof.


In subterranean well stimulation, the ability to perforate multiple zones in a single well and then fracture each zone independently, (typically referred to as “zone” fracturing), has desirably increased access to potential hydrocarbon reserves. Many gas wells are drilled with zone fracturing planned at the well's inception. Zone fracturing helps stimulate the well by creating conduits from the formation for the hydrocarbons to reach the well. A well drilled with planned fracturing zones will be equipped with a string of piping below the cemented casing portion of the well. The string is segmented with packing elements, fracture plugs and fracture plug seat assemblies to isolate zones. A fracture plug, such as a ball or other suitably shaped structure (hereinafter referred to collectively as a “ball”) is dropped or pumped down the well and seats on the fracture plug seat assembly, thereby isolating pressure from above.


In order to progressively fracture successive subterranean zones along the length of the wellbore it is necessary to construct the ball seat so that its annular shape is diametrically expandable to permit one or more fracture balls to be forced therethrough on their way to expandable plug seats further downhole to sealingly seat on these lower seats. It is further necessary to selectively preclude diametrical expansion of the seats to permit this sealing engagement between a fracture ball and the seat.


Previously proposed expandable fracture ball seats of this general type have been subject to well known problems, limitations and disadvantages. For example, in order to permit the necessary diametrical expansion of a ball seat it is typically necessary to form one or more radial slits therein which widen as the fracture ball passes through the seat. These necessarily widened slits have proven to be susceptible to having well debris lodged therein which can undesirably prevent proper complete closure of the gaps, when the seat returns to its smaller diameter relaxed position, thereby denigrating the requisite sealing capability of the seat when it is called upon to be sealingly engaged by a fracture ball plug (i.e., when the ball is acting as a plug) and prevent its passage through the circular seat opening.


Additionally, during the high pressure injection of frac slurry into a perforated downhole formation, the plug seat is subject to an abrasive blasting effect of the slurry. In conventionally designed plug seats this causes erosion of the seats, thereby lessening their plug sealing ability. Moreover, conventionally constructed plug seats, due to the driving pressure exerted on the ball plugs, may create stress concentrations on the balls sufficient to deform them and thereby substantially reduce the sealing capability of the associated ball seat.


As can be seen from the foregoing, a need exists for an improved expandable fracture ball seat structure which eliminates or at least reduces the aforementioned problems, limitations and disadvantages associated with previously proposed expandable fracture plug seats as generally described above. It is to this need that the present invention is primarily directed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a ball entry side elevational view of a specially designed expandable annular fracture ball seat embodying principles of the present invention, the seat being in its relaxed, retracted position;



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view through the ball seat taken along line 2-2 of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a ball entry side elevational view of the ball seat in a resiliently expanded, diametrically enlarged position;



FIGS. 4-6 are simplified, partially schematic cross-sectional views through the ball seat operatively supported in a representative expansion control structure, and respectively illustrate a ball plug member (1) initially engaging the seat, (2) expanding and downwardly passing through the seat, and (3) sealingly engaging the seat when it is precluded from diametrically expanding;



FIG. 7 is a ball entry side elevational view of a first alternate embodiment of the expandable ball seat in a diametrically expanded position thereof; and



FIG. 8 is a radially directed cross-sectional view through a second alternate embodiment of the expandable ball seat in its relaxed position.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

With initial reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, in an illustrative embodiment thereof the present invention provides a specially designed fracture ball plug seat structure 10 having an overall annular configuration. Seat 10, depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2 in its diametrically relaxed position, is particularly well suited to downhole well “zone” fracturing operations and includes an annular circumferentially spaced apart array of rigid arcuate ring segments 12 formed from a high modulus material such as metal, with a series of circumferential gaps 14 being interdigitated with the segments 12. Each of the gaps 14 has a width W1 and is circumferentially bounded by opposing end surfaces 16 of a circumferentially adjacent pair of the ring segments 12.


Still referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the seat structure 10 circumscribes an axis 18 and has a ball entry side 20 and a ball exit side 22. Each of the rigid ring segments 12 has a radially outer side surface 24 with a circumferentially extending groove 26 formed therein, and a radially inner side surface 28 having an annular portion 28a that slopes radially outwardly toward the ball entry side 20 of the seat structure 10, and an annular portion 28b that slopes radially outwardly from the axially inner periphery of the annular portion 28a to the ball exit side 22 of the seat structure 10. The radially outer side surface 24 has a sloping ball entry side annular corner surface portion 24a, and an oppositely sloping ball exit side annular corner surface portion 24b.


The seat structure 10, in addition to the rigid portion thereof defined by the rigid ring segments 12, has a resilient portion 29, formed from a suitable low modulus elastomeric material such as rubber, comprising an inner annular resilient ring member 30, a circumferentially spaced array of resilient members 32 projecting radially outwardly from the inner ring member 30 and extending through and substantially filling the ring gaps 14, and a resilient outer ring member 34.


In the representative seat structure embodiment 10 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the resilient structures 30, 32 and 34 are integral sections of the overall resilient portion 29, with the inner ring member 30 being bonded to the radially inner ring segment surface portions 28a, each of the radially extending portions 32 being bonded to the facing end surfaces 16 of a circumferentially adjacent pair of the ring segments 12, and the outer ring member 34 being received in the ring segment grooves 26.


Additionally, an annular spring structure, representatively a garter spring 36, may be provided and is received in the ring segment grooves 26 and embedded in the resilient outer ring member 34. The fracture ball plug seat structure 10 may be conveniently fabricated by an over-molding process in which the resilient portion 29 of the seat is flowed into place against and appropriately bonded to the annular array of rigid ring segments 12 and encapsulates the garter spring 36. The resilient structure portion 29 of the seat 10 (along with the spring 36 if utilized) resiliently retains the seat in its relaxed, retracted position, shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, in which the seat has a minimum diameter D1 extending between facing portions of the radially inner surface of the inner resilient ring 30.


When, as subsequently described herein, a plug ball having a diameter greater than D1 is operatively forced through the seat 10, the ball diametrically expands the seat 10 (as shown in FIG. 3) in a manner increasing its minimum inner diameter to D2, increasing the ring gap widths to W2, and widening the resilient radial projections 32 to widths W2, against the yielding resistive force of the resilient portion 29 and the spring 36.



FIGS. 4-6 illustrate the seat structure 10 coaxially received in and operatively engaging a representative expansion control structure 40. FIG. 4 illustrates a plug ball 42 initially engaging the seat structure 10 in a downhole direction and having a diameter greater than the relaxed inner diameter D1 of the seat structure 10. FIG. 5 illustrates the ball 42 passing in the downhole direction through the seat structure 10 and diametrically expanding it as the plug ball 42 passes therethrough. FIG. 6 illustrates the seat structure 10 sealingly engaged with the plug ball 42, with the expansion control structure blocking the downhole passage of the plug ball 42 through the seat structure 10.


Returning now to FIG. 4, the expansion control structure 40 which internally and coaxially supports the seat structure 10 for operative engagement with the plug ball 42 comprises an outer tubular member 44, and an inner tubular member 46 slidingly telescoped therein.


Outer tubular member 44 has, at its upper end, an inturned annular flange 48 that defines in the interior of the outer tubular member 44 the upper end of a radially outwardly enlarged annular pocket area 50 terminating at its lower end at an annular ledge surface 52 that slopes downwardly and radially inwardly at an angle substantially identical to the slope angle of the corner surfaces 24b of the rigid ring segments 12 of the seat structure 10.


Inner tubular member 46 is axially shorter than the outer tubular member 44 and has a radially inwardly thinned upper end portion 54 defining at its lower end an annular upwardly facing ledge 56. At the lower end of the inner tubular member 46 is a downwardly and radially outwardly sloped end surface 58 having a slope angle substantially identical to the slope angle of the corner surfaces 24a of the rigid ring segments 12 of the seat structure 10. When the seat structure 10 is initially installed in the expansion control structure 40, as shown in FIG. 4, the rigid seat structure ring segments 12 are interposed between the annular surfaces 52 and 58 of the outer and inner tubular members 44 and 46. A helical spring 60 disposed in the annular pocket area 50 bears at its opposite ends against the underside of the annular flange 48 and the annular ledge 56, and holds the sloped outer and inner tubular member surfaces 52 and 58 slidingly against the complementarily sloped surfaces 24b and 24a of the rigid seat structure ring segments 12, respectively. The compression from the sloped surfaces 52,58 keep the seat structure 10 axially aligned.


The expansion control structure 40 further comprises an annular locking ring member 62 having a flat annular upper side surface 64, and a bottom side surface 66 that slopes downwardly and radially inwardly at a slope angle substantially identical to the slope angle of the outer tubular member surface 52. Locking ring member 62 is coaxially and slidingly received in the annular pocket area 50 in an upwardly spaced apart relationship with the annular sloped surface 52 of the outer tubular member 44, and is releasably held in its FIG. 4 position, against further downward movement toward the sloped outer tubular member surface 52, by a suitable restraining mechanism.


Representatively, but not by way of limitation, such restraining mechanism may take the form of a pin member 68 slidingly received in a bore 70 formed in the inner side surface of the outer tubular member 44 above its sloped interior surface 52. When the seat structure 10 is initially installed in the expansion control structure 40, the pin 68 is releasably locked in a suitable manner in its FIG. 4 position in which it projects inwardly into the pocket area 50 and acts as an abutment that precludes downward movement of the locking ring member 62 past its FIG. 4 position. A compressed helical spring 72 coaxially disposed in the pocket area 50 bears at its opposite ends against the underside of the annular flange 48 and the upper side 64 of the locking ring 62 and exerts a resilient downwardly directed force thereon.


Turning now to FIG. 5, as the ball 42 is driven further downwardly from its initial seat structure engaging position shown in FIG. 4 (by, for example, fluid pressure exerted on the uphole side of the ball 42) the ball 42 is forced downwardly through the seat structure 10, expanding it in a manner radially outwardly by driving the rigid ring segments 12 into the pocket area 50, and thus permitting the ball 42 to pass downwardly through and exit the seat structure 10. The forcible movement of the rigid ring segments 12 into the pocket area 50, by virtue of the sliding engagement of the sloped surface pairs 24a,58 and 24b,52, causes an axially upwardly directed translation of the inner tubular member 46 relative to the outer tubular member 44, thereby further compressing the spring 60. The compression of the spring 60, in turn, forcibly creates annular seal areas at the annular surface pairs 24a,58 and 24b,52 to desirably keep pressurized fluid above the seat structure from entering the pocket area 50. After the ball 42 has passed downwardly through the seat structure 10, the seat structure 10 and the components of the expansion control structure 40 return to their FIG. 4 orientations via the downward force exerted on the inner tubular member 46 by the compressed spring 60.


With reference now to FIG. 6, when it is desired to preclude the downhole passage of a ball 42 through the seat structure 10 (with the seat structure 10 and the expansion control structure 40 in their previously described FIG. 4 orientations), the retaining pin 68 is retracted in a suitable manner to its FIG. 6 orientation in which it is withdrawn into the bore 70 so it no longer projects into the pocket area 50 in an underlying abutment position relative to the locking ring 62. This permits the locking ring 62 to be moved downwardly from its FIG. 4 position to its FIG. 6 position in which the locking ring 62 now forms an annular radially outward abutment that prevents the seat structure 10 from being expanded to an outer diameter greater than its relaxed position outer diameter. Since the ball 42 illustrated in FIG. 6 has a diameter greater than the minimum interior diameter D1 of the seat structure 10 in its relaxed position, the ball 10 now is precluded from passing in a downhole direction through the seat structure 10 and forms a plug seal between the interior portion of the inner tubular member 46 above the seat structure 10 and the interior portion of the inner tubular member 46 below the seat structure 10.


The representative fracture ball plug seat structure embodiment 10 described above is of a simple composite structure and utilizes hard metallic (or other suitable rigid material) segments with soft elastomer material (illustratively rubber) to serve as a binder and shield. The soft elastomeric material has the elasticity to expand and contract without yielding, while the metallic segments have the rigidity and strength to adequately support the ball. The elastomeric material between the metallic segments could be bonded to each adjacent metallic segment (as shown for the seat structure 10). In this case, the elastomeric material prevents a gap from occurring during seat expansion, thereby preventing debris from lodging between the metallic segments. It is also possible to not bond the elastomeric material to the adjacent ends of the metallic segments (as subsequently illustrated and described herein). In the event that debris does become lodged between the metallic segments, the debris would simply embed into the elastomeric material and still allow the metallic segments to retract to their original positions.


Another benefit of this design is the elastomeric material which is preferably over-molded and bonded to the surface receiving the plug ball. The resulting resilient ball-contacting seat surface endures a blasting effect from frac fluid (a water/sand slurry) during a frac operation. Unlike a rigid metal, which tends to eventually erode in these conditions, the elastomeric material serves as a liner and absorbs the energy from the slurry grit, then lets the grit bounce off harmlessly. The elastomeric surface receiving the ball also desirably serves as a cushion to protect the ball from stress concentrations that might occur from the rigid metallic segments. The elastomeric seat material also insures a leak free seal to prevent high pressure washout while the ball is acting as a plug.


An annular array of circumferential grooves is formed when the metallic segments are aligned in position for the subsequent elastomeric material over-molding process. Optionally, elastomeric material and/or an annular spring member can be placed in these grooves to help align the segments and maintain additional cinching force on the segments to insure that the seat returns to its molded position from a diametrically expanded position. At least one side of the seat (for example the ball entry side of the seat) may be beveled so that axial force from the adjacent component in the assembly will also force the metallic segments to their most inward positions. The beveled surface also helps keep the seat structure concentric in all positions.


A first alternate embodiment 10a of the previously described seat structure 10 is shown in FIG. 7 in a diametrically expanded position thereof. The seat 10a is identical to the seat 10 with the exception that in the seat 10a the resilient radial elastomeric material projections 32 are not bonded to their associated circumferentially adjacent rigid ring segment end surfaces 16. Accordingly, when the seat structure 10a is diametrically expanded as shown in FIG. 7, voids 74 are created between each resilient material projection 32 and the ring segment end surfaces 16 on opposite sides thereof. These voids 74 advantageously decrease the force which must be exerted on the seat 10a to operatively expand it. As previously discussed, while this lack of bonding of the projections 32 to the ring segments 12 can potentially permit some debris into the gaps between the facing ring segment end surfaces 16, such debris will embed in the projections 32 and still allow the ring segments 12 to retract to their original positions.


A second alternate embodiment 10b of the previously described expandable seat structure 10 is cross-sectionally illustrated in FIG. 8. Seat structure 10b is identical to the previously described seat structure 10 with the exception that the rigid portion of the seat structure 10b comprises, in addition to the circumferentially spaced array of rigid metal ring segments 12, a depending tubular metallic collet collar 76 formed integrally with the ring segments 12 and having an interior diameter D3 larger than the minimum interior diameter D1 of the upper ring segment portion of seat structure 10b. Accordingly, the rigid portion of the seat structure 10b is of a unitary construction which simplifies the overall construction of the seat structure 10b.


As can be seen in FIG. 8, the ring segment gaps 14 incorporated in the seat structure 10 and implemented in the seat structure 10b are carried downwardly through the annular wall of the collar 76 in the seat structure 10b to just above its open lower end 78, thereby giving the collar 76 its collet-like configuration.


It is to be noted that when the upper ring segment portion of the seat structure embodiment 10b is diametrically expanded, the collar 76 diametrically expands as well. The elastomeric material 32 disposed in the ring gaps 14 of the upper ring portion of the seat structure 10b (see FIG. 1) may be carried down through the downward extensions of the gaps 14 in the collar 76 if desired.


The foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An expandable fracture plug seat apparatus for an expansion control structure, comprising: an annular array of rigid ring segments having radially inner and outer surfaces and being interdigitated with an annular array of circumferential gaps radially extending between facing end surfaces of said rigid ring segments, the radially outer surface comprising a sloping annular corner surface portion shaped and arranged to slidably engage the expansion control structure;an annular resilient liner secured to said radially inner surfaces of said rigid ring segments; andsaid fracture plug seat apparatus being resiliently expandable between (1) a retracted position in which said annular resilient liner has a first minimum interior diameter and said circumferential gaps have first circumferential widths, and (2) a resiliently expanded position in which said annular resilient liner has a second minimum interior diameter greater than said first minimum interior diameter, and said circumferential gaps have second circumferential widths greater than said first circumferential widths.
  • 2. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 1, wherein the annular array of rigid ring segments comprises a ball entry side and a ball exit side, and wherein the sloping annular corner surface portion is located on the ball entry side.
  • 3. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 2, wherein the radially outer surface comprises a second sloping annular corner surface portion on the ball exit side shaped and arranged to slidably engage the expansion control structure.
  • 4. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 2, wherein the radially inner surface comprises: a first annular portion that slopes radially outwardly toward the ball entry side; anda second annular portion that slopes radially outwardly toward the ball exit side.
  • 5. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 4, wherein the first annular portion that slopes radially outwardly toward the ball entry side comprises a curve forming a seat for a fracture plug dropped on the ball entry side.
  • 6. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 4, wherein the annular resilient liner is formed on the first annular portion and is not formed on the second annular portion.
  • 7. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 1, wherein the annular array of rigid ring segments defines an inner diameter when in the retracted position, and wherein the annular resilient liner secured to the radially inner surfaces also defines the same inner diameter as the annular array of rigid ring segments.
  • 8. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 1, wherein the annular array of rigid ring segments comprises an innermost portion that defines an inner diameter when in the retracted position, the inner diameter fo the annular resilient liner being the same as the inner diameter of the annular array.
  • 9. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 1, comprising a circumferentially spaced series of resilient sections extending radially outwardly from said annular resilient liner and received in said circumferential gaps.
  • 10. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 9, wherein the resilient sections are integral portions of the annular resilient liner.
  • 11. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 1, further comprising an annular spring structure coaxially circumscribing said annular array of rigid ring segments and resiliently urging said fracture plug seat apparatus toward said retracted position.
  • 12. An expandable fracture plug seat apparatus for an expansion control structure, comprising: an annular array of rigid ring segments having radial inner and outer surfaces, the annular array of rigid ring segments having a ball entry side and a ball exit side, the radially outer surface comprising: a first sloping annular corner surface portion shaped and arranged to slidably engage the expansion control structure on the ball entry side, anda second sloping annular corner surface portion shaped and arranged to slidably engage the expansion control structure on the ball exit side, andan annular resilient liner secured to said radially inner surfaces of said rigid ring segments; andsaid fracture plug seat apparatus being resiliently expandable between (1) a retracted position in which said annular resilient liner has a first minimum interior diameter, and (2) a resiliently expanded position in which said annular resilient liner has a second minimum interior diameter greater than said first minimum interior diameter.
  • 13. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 12, wherein the annular array of rigid ring segments is interdigitated with an annular array of circumferential gaps radially extending between facing end surfaces of said rigid ring segments, the expandable fracture plug seat apparatus comprising a circumferentially spaced series of resilient sections extending radially outwardly from said annular resilient liner and received in said circumferential gaps.
  • 14. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 13, wherein the resilient sections are integral portions of the annular resilient liner.
  • 15. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 12, wherein the radial inner surface comprises: a first annular portion that slopes radially outwardly toward the ball entry side; anda second annular portion that slopes radially outwardly toward the ball exit side.
  • 16. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 15, wherein the first annular portion that slopes radially outwardly toward the ball entry side comprises a curve forming a seat for a fracture plug dropped on the ball entry side.
  • 17. The expandable fracture plug seat apparatus of claim 15, wherein the annular resilient liner is formed on the first annular portion and is not formed on the second annular portion.
  • 18. A fracturing system for a wellbore, comprising: an expandable fracture plug seat apparatus including: an annular array of rigid ring segments having radially inner and outer surfaces, the radially outer surface comprising a sloping annular corner surface portion shaped and arranged to slidably engage the expansion control structure,an annular resilient liner secured to said radially inner surfaces of said rigid ring segments, andsaid fracture plug seat apparatus being resiliently expandable between (1) a retracted position in which said annular resilient liner has a first minimum interior diameter, and (2) a resiliently expanded position in which said annular resilient liner has a second minimum interior diameter greater than said first minimum interior diameter; andan expansion control structure for operatively supporting said expandable fracture plug seat apparatus, the expansion control structure having a sloping annular surface portion slidingly engaged with the sloping annular corner surface portion, the expansion control structure selectively permitting and precluding expansion of said expandable fracture plug seat apparatus between the retracted position and the expanded position.
  • 19. The fracturing system of claim 18, wherein the annular array of rigid ring segments comprises a ball entry side and a ball exit side, and wherein the sloping annular corner surface portion is located on the ball entry side.
  • 20. The fracturing system of claim 19, wherein the radially outer surface comprises a second sloping annular corner surface portion on the ball exit side, and wherein the expansion control structure comprises a second sloping annular surface portion slidingly engaged with the second sloping annular corner surface portion.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claim priority to and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. 13/971,254, filed Aug. 20, 2013, which claims the benefit of the filing date of provisional U.S. Patent Application 61/697,390 filed Sep. 6, 2012. The entire disclosures of these priority applications are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (115)
Number Name Date Kind
2743905 Eckel May 1956 A
2947363 Sackett et al. Aug 1960 A
2973006 Nelson Feb 1961 A
3054415 Baker et al. Sep 1962 A
3441279 Lally et al. Apr 1969 A
3554281 Ecuer Jan 1971 A
3568768 Rowell, Jr. Mar 1971 A
3667505 Radig Jun 1972 A
3885627 Berry et al. May 1975 A
4044835 Mott Aug 1977 A
4189150 Langieri Feb 1980 A
4252196 Silberman et al. Feb 1981 A
4292988 Montgomery Oct 1981 A
4448216 Speegle et al. May 1984 A
4510994 Pringle Apr 1985 A
4520870 Pringle Jun 1985 A
4537383 Fredd Aug 1985 A
4583593 Zunkel et al. Apr 1986 A
4593914 Johnson Jun 1986 A
4828037 Lindsey et al. May 1989 A
5146992 Baugh Sep 1992 A
5165473 Bode Nov 1992 A
5226539 Cheng Jul 1993 A
5244044 Henderson Sep 1993 A
5297580 Thurman Mar 1994 A
5813483 Latham et al. Sep 1998 A
5960881 Allamon et al. Oct 1999 A
6003607 Hagen et al. Dec 1999 A
6032734 Teifer Mar 2000 A
6053246 Echols et al. Apr 2000 A
6053250 Echols Apr 2000 A
6155350 Melenyzer Dec 2000 A
6189618 Beeman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6227298 Patel May 2001 B1
6230807 Patel May 2001 B1
6390200 Allamon et al. May 2002 B1
6662877 Patel Dec 2003 B2
6681860 Yokley et al. Jan 2004 B1
6695066 Allamon et al. Feb 2004 B2
6725935 Szarka et al. Apr 2004 B2
6769490 Allamon et al. Aug 2004 B2
6799638 Butterfield, Jr. Oct 2004 B2
6866100 Gudmestad et al. Mar 2005 B2
6966368 Farquhar Nov 2005 B2
7021389 Bishop et al. Apr 2006 B2
7134505 Fehr et al. Nov 2006 B2
7464764 Xu Dec 2008 B2
7503392 King et al. Mar 2009 B2
7628210 Avant et al. Dec 2009 B2
7637323 Schasteen et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644772 Avant et al. Jan 2010 B2
7647964 Akbar et al. Jan 2010 B2
7673677 King et al. Mar 2010 B2
7681645 McMillin et al. Mar 2010 B2
7694732 Rogers et al. Apr 2010 B2
7921922 Darnell et al. Apr 2011 B2
8151891 Darnell et al. Apr 2012 B1
8261761 Gerrard et al. Sep 2012 B2
8276675 Williamson et al. Oct 2012 B2
8403068 Robison et al. Mar 2013 B2
8479808 Gouthaman Jul 2013 B2
8479823 Mireles Jul 2013 B2
8668006 Xu Mar 2014 B2
8950496 Kitzman Feb 2015 B2
9004179 Chauffe Apr 2015 B2
9234406 Naedler et al. Jan 2016 B2
9316084 Carter et al. Apr 2016 B2
9353598 Naedler et al. May 2016 B2
9382787 Naedler et al. Jul 2016 B2
20020043368 Bell et al. Apr 2002 A1
20050072572 Churchill Apr 2005 A1
20050126638 Gilbert Jun 2005 A1
20060213670 Bishop et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060243455 Telfer et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070017679 Wolf et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070181188 Branch et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080066924 Xu Mar 2008 A1
20080093080 Palmer et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080217025 Rudock et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090044946 Schasteen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044949 King et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044955 King et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090159289 Avant et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090308588 Howell et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100101803 Clayton et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100132954 Telfer Jun 2010 A1
20100212911 Chen et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100282338 Gerrard et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110067888 Mireles Mar 2011 A1
20110108284 Flores et al. May 2011 A1
20110180270 Martin et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110192607 Hofman et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110192613 Garcia et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110278017 Themig et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110315389 Crider et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110315390 Guillory et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120048556 O'Connell et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120097265 Gerrard et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120181032 Naedler et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120227973 Hart et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120261131 Hofman et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120305236 Gouthaman Dec 2012 A1
20120305265 Garcia et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130025868 Smith et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130118732 Chauffe et al. May 2013 A1
20130133876 Naedler et al. May 2013 A1
20130153220 Carter et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130186633 Kitzman Jul 2013 A1
20130186644 Smith et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130299199 Naedler et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140060813 Naedler et al. Mar 2014 A1
20150068762 Naedler Mar 2015 A1
20150176361 Prosser et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150191998 Naedler et al. Jul 2015 A1
20160002995 Naedler et al. Jan 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
2771732 Sep 2012 CA
2006314708 Nov 2006 JP
WO 0063526 Oct 2000 WO
WO 2009067485 May 2009 WO
WO 2013090805 Jun 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2012/069883, dated Apr. 12, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2013/056185, dated Jan. 29, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170122061 A1 May 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61697390 Sep 2012 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13971254 Aug 2013 US
Child 15404655 US