The present invention generally relates to subterranean well fracturing operations and, in representatively illustrated embodiments thereof, more particularly relates to specially designed expandable fracture plug seat structures and associated apparatus for operatively supporting them downhole and selectively permitting and precluding expansion thereof.
In subterranean well stimulation, the ability to perforate multiple zones in a single well and then fracture each zone independently, (typically referred to as “zone” fracturing), has desirably increased access to potential hydrocarbon reserves. Many gas wells are drilled with zone fracturing planned at the well's inception. Zone fracturing helps stimulate the well by creating conduits from the formation for the hydrocarbons to reach the well. A well drilled with planned fracturing zones will be equipped with a string of piping below the cemented casing portion of the well. The string is segmented with packing elements, fracture plugs and fracture plug seat assemblies to isolate zones. A fracture plug, such as a ball or other suitably shaped structure (hereinafter referred to collectively as a “ball”) is dropped or pumped down the well and seats on the fracture plug seat assembly, thereby isolating pressure from above.
In order to progressively fracture successive subterranean zones along the length of the wellbore it is necessary to construct the ball seat so that its annular shape is diametrically expandable to permit one or more fracture balls to be forced therethrough on their way to expandable plug seats further downhole to sealingly seat on these lower seats. It is further necessary to selectively preclude diametrical expansion of the seats to permit this sealing engagement between a fracture ball and the seat.
Previously proposed expandable fracture ball seats of this general type have been subject to well known problems, limitations and disadvantages. For example, in order to permit the necessary diametrical expansion of a ball seat it is typically necessary to form one or more radial slits therein which widen as the fracture ball passes through the seat. These necessarily widened slits have proven to be susceptible to having well debris lodged therein which can undesirably prevent proper complete closure of the gaps, when the seat returns to its smaller diameter relaxed position, thereby denigrating the requisite sealing capability of the seat when it is called upon to be sealingly engaged by a fracture ball plug (i.e., when the ball is acting as a plug) and prevent its passage through the circular seat opening.
Additionally, during the high pressure injection of frac slurry into a perforated downhole formation, the plug seat is subject to an abrasive blasting effect of the slurry. In conventionally designed plug seats this causes erosion of the seats, thereby lessening their plug sealing ability. Moreover, conventionally constructed plug seats, due to the driving pressure exerted on the ball plugs, may create stress concentrations on the balls sufficient to deform them and thereby substantially reduce the sealing capability of the associated ball seat.
As can be seen from the foregoing, a need exists for an improved expandable fracture ball seat structure which eliminates or at least reduces the aforementioned problems, limitations and disadvantages associated with previously proposed expandable fracture plug seats as generally described above. It is to this need that the present invention is primarily directed.
With initial reference to
Still referring to
The seat structure 10, in addition to the rigid portion thereof defined by the rigid ring segments 12, has a resilient portion 29, formed from a suitable low modulus elastomeric material such as rubber, comprising an inner annular resilient ring member 30, a circumferentially spaced array of resilient members 32 projecting radially outwardly from the inner ring member 30 and extending through and substantially filling the ring gaps 14, and a resilient outer ring member 34.
In the representative seat structure embodiment 10 shown in
Additionally, an annular spring structure, representatively a garter spring 36, may be provided and is received in the ring segment grooves 26 and embedded in the resilient outer ring member 34. The fracture ball plug seat structure 10 may be conveniently fabricated by an over-molding process in which the resilient portion 29 of the seat is flowed into place against and appropriately bonded to the annular array of rigid ring segments 12 and encapsulates the garter spring 36. The resilient structure portion 29 of the seat 10 (along with the spring 36 if utilized) resiliently retains the seat in its relaxed, retracted position, shown in
When, as subsequently described herein, a plug ball having a diameter greater than D1 is operatively forced through the seat 10, the ball diametrically expands the seat 10 (as shown in
Returning now to
Outer tubular member 44 has, at its upper end, an inturned annular flange 48 that defines in the interior of the outer tubular member 44 the upper end of a radially outwardly enlarged annular pocket area 50 terminating at its lower end at an annular ledge surface 52 that slopes downwardly and radially inwardly at an angle substantially identical to the slope angle of the corner surfaces 24b of the rigid ring segments 12 of the seat structure 10.
Inner tubular member 46 is axially shorter than the outer tubular member 44 and has a radially inwardly thinned upper end portion 54 defining at its lower end an annular upwardly facing ledge 56. At the lower end of the inner tubular member 46 is a downwardly and radially outwardly sloped end surface 58 having a slope angle substantially identical to the slope angle of the corner surfaces 24a of the rigid ring segments 12 of the seat structure 10. When the seat structure 10 is initially installed in the expansion control structure 40, as shown in
The expansion control structure 40 further comprises an annular locking ring member 62 having a flat annular upper side surface 64, and a bottom side surface 66 that slopes downwardly and radially inwardly at a slope angle substantially identical to the slope angle of the outer tubular member surface 52. Locking ring member 62 is coaxially and slidingly received in the annular pocket area 50 in an upwardly spaced apart relationship with the annular sloped surface 52 of the outer tubular member 44, and is releasably held in its
Representatively, but not by way of limitation, such restraining mechanism may take the form of a pin member 68 slidingly received in a bore 70 formed in the inner side surface of the outer tubular member 44 above its sloped interior surface 52. When the seat structure 10 is initially installed in the expansion control structure 40, the pin 68 is releasably locked in a suitable manner in its
Turning now to
With reference now to
The representative fracture ball plug seat structure embodiment 10 described above is of a simple composite structure and utilizes hard metallic (or other suitable rigid material) segments with soft elastomer material (illustratively rubber) to serve as a binder and shield. The soft elastomeric material has the elasticity to expand and contract without yielding, while the metallic segments have the rigidity and strength to adequately support the ball. The elastomeric material between the metallic segments could be bonded to each adjacent metallic segment (as shown for the seat structure 10). In this case, the elastomeric material prevents a gap from occurring during seat expansion, thereby preventing debris from lodging between the metallic segments. It is also possible to not bond the elastomeric material to the adjacent ends of the metallic segments (as subsequently illustrated and described herein). In the event that debris does become lodged between the metallic segments, the debris would simply embed into the elastomeric material and still allow the metallic segments to retract to their original positions.
Another benefit of this design is the elastomeric material which is preferably over-molded and bonded to the surface receiving the plug ball. The resulting resilient ball-contacting seat surface endures a blasting effect from frac fluid (a water/sand slurry) during a frac operation. Unlike a rigid metal, which tends to eventually erode in these conditions, the elastomeric material serves as a liner and absorbs the energy from the slurry grit, then lets the grit bounce off harmlessly. The elastomeric surface receiving the ball also desirably serves as a cushion to protect the ball from stress concentrations that might occur from the rigid metallic segments. The elastomeric seat material also insures a leak free seal to prevent high pressure washout while the ball is acting as a plug.
An annular array of circumferential grooves is formed when the metallic segments are aligned in position for the subsequent elastomeric material over-molding process. Optionally, elastomeric material and/or an annular spring member can be placed in these grooves to help align the segments and maintain additional cinching force on the segments to insure that the seat returns to its molded position from a diametrically expanded position. At least one side of the seat (for example the ball entry side of the seat) may be beveled so that axial force from the adjacent component in the assembly will also force the metallic segments to their most inward positions. The beveled surface also helps keep the seat structure concentric in all positions.
A first alternate embodiment 10a of the previously described seat structure 10 is shown in
A second alternate embodiment 10b of the previously described expandable seat structure 10 is cross-sectionally illustrated in
As can be seen in
It is to be noted that when the upper ring segment portion of the seat structure embodiment 10b is diametrically expanded, the collar 76 diametrically expands as well. The elastomeric material 32 disposed in the ring gaps 14 of the upper ring portion of the seat structure 10b (see
The foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit of the filing date of provisional U.S. patent application No. 61/697,390 filed Sep. 6, 2012. The entire disclosure of the provisional application is hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2743905 | Eckel | May 1956 | A |
2947363 | Sackett et al. | Aug 1960 | A |
2973006 | Nelson | Feb 1961 | A |
3054415 | Baker et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
3441279 | Lally et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3554281 | Ecuer | Jan 1971 | A |
3568768 | Rowell, Jr. | Mar 1971 | A |
3667505 | Radig | Jun 1972 | A |
3885627 | Berry et al. | May 1975 | A |
4044835 | Mott | Aug 1977 | A |
4189150 | Langieri | Feb 1980 | A |
4252196 | Silberman et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4292988 | Montgomery | Oct 1981 | A |
4448216 | Speegle et al. | May 1984 | A |
4510994 | Pringle | Apr 1985 | A |
4520870 | Pringle | Jun 1985 | A |
4537383 | Fredd | Aug 1985 | A |
4583593 | Zunkel et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4593914 | Johnson | Jun 1986 | A |
4828037 | Lindsey et al. | May 1989 | A |
5146992 | Baugh | Sep 1992 | A |
5165473 | Bode | Nov 1992 | A |
5226539 | Cheng | Jul 1993 | A |
5244044 | Henderson | Sep 1993 | A |
5297580 | Thurman | Mar 1994 | A |
5813483 | Latham et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5960881 | Allamon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6003607 | Hagen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6032734 | Teifer | Mar 2000 | A |
6053246 | Echols et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053250 | Echols | Apr 2000 | A |
6155350 | Melenyzer | Dec 2000 | A |
6189618 | Beeman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6227298 | Patel | May 2001 | B1 |
6230807 | Patel | May 2001 | B1 |
6390200 | Allamon et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6662877 | Patel | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6681860 | Yokley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6695066 | Allamon et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6725935 | Szarka et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6769490 | Allamon et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6799638 | Butterfield, Jr. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6866100 | Gudmestad et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6966368 | Farquhar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7021389 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7134505 | Fehr et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7464764 | Xu | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7503392 | King et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7628210 | Avant et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637323 | Schasteen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644772 | Avant et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647964 | Akbar et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7673677 | King et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681645 | McMillin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694732 | Rogers et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7921922 | Darnell et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8151891 | Darnell et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8261761 | Gerrard et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8276675 | Williamson et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8403068 | Robison et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8479808 | Gouthaman | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8479823 | Mireles | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8668006 | Xu | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8950496 | Kitzman | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9004179 | Chauffe | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9234406 | Naedler et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9316084 | Carter et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9353598 | Naedler et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9382787 | Naedler et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20020043368 | Bell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20050072572 | Churchill | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050126638 | Gilbert | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060213670 | Bishop et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060243455 | Telfer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070017679 | Wolf et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070181188 | Branch et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080066924 | Xu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093080 | Palmer et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080217025 | Ruddock et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090044946 | Schasteen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044949 | King et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044955 | King et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090159289 | Avant et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090308588 | Howell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100101803 | Clayton et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100132954 | Telfer | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100212911 | Chen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100282338 | Gerrard et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110067888 | Mireles | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110108284 | Flores et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110180270 | Martin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110192607 | Hofman et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110192613 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110278017 | Themig et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110315389 | Crider et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110315390 | Guillory et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120048556 | O'Connell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120097265 | Gerrard et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120181032 | Naedler et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120227973 | Hart | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120261131 | Hofman et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120305236 | Gouthaman | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120305265 | Garcia et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130025868 | Smith et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130118732 | Chauffe et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133876 | Naedler et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130153220 | Carter et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130186633 | Kitzman | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186644 | Smith et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130299199 | Naedler et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140060813 | Naedler et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150068762 | Naedler | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150176361 | Prosser et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150191998 | Naedler et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160002995 | Naedler et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2771732 | Sep 2012 | CA |
2006314708 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO 0063526 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 2009067485 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2013090805 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
KIPO, International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2012/069883, Apr. 12, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2013/056185 dated Jan. 29, 2014, 9 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140060813 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61697390 | Sep 2012 | US |