Expandable impeller pump

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10215187
  • Patent Number
    10,215,187
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 13, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 26, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
An impeller includes a hub, and a plurality of blades supported by the hub, the blades being arranged in at least two blade rows. The impeller has a deployed configuration in which the blades extend away from the hub, and a stored configuration in which at least one of the blades is radially compressed, for example by folding the blade towards the hub. The impeller may also have an operational configuration in which at least some of the blades are deformed from the deployed configuration upon rotation of the impeller when in the deployed configuration. The outer edge of one or more blades may have a winglet, and the base of the blades may have an associated indentation to facilitate folding of the blades.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to fluid pumping impellers, in particular to expandable impellers.


Conventional impellers are manufactured with a particular blade configuration, and significant deformation of the blades is generally undesirable. Conventionally, the impeller has the same configuration during storage, movement to its operating location, and use. However, there are situations where access to the operating location is through a restricted space, or space is otherwise at a premium during storage or transport of the impeller, in which case the use of conventional impellers can be problematic.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An apparatus according to one embodiment of the present invention for inducing motion of a fluid relative to the apparatus includes an impeller. The impeller includes a hub extending in a length direction; and a plurality of blades supported by the hub, each blade having a proximal end attached to the hub and a distal end, the blades being arranged in at least two blade rows arranged in series in the length direction of the hub. The impeller has a deployed configuration and a stored configuration, each blade in the deployed configuration extending away from the hub, and at least one of the blades in the stored configuration being compressed as to move the distal end of the at least one blade towards the hub. Each blade row may include at least two blades. Furthermore, the plurality of blades may be formed integrally with the hub.


The distal end of at least one of the plurality of blades may include a winglet. In some embodiments, the distal end of each blade in at least one blade row may include a winglet. In other embodiments, the distal end of each of the plurality of blades may include a winglet.


Preferred embodiments of the present invention may further include an expandable sleeve. The sleeve may include a matrix and a film disposed around the matrix, at least part of the impeller being located within the sleeve. The matrix may be formed from a shape memory material, and the film may include an elastic polymer. The expandable sleeve may have a storage configuration and an expanded configuration. In the storage configuration, the sleeve may have a diameter less than about 4 mm. The sleeve may have an inlet end and a discharge end, with a plurality of vanes arranged at the discharge end. Each of the plurality of vanes may have an airfoil-shaped cross-section.


An apparatus according to another embodiment of the present invention for inducing motion of a fluid relative to the apparatus includes an impeller. The impeller includes a hub extending in a length direction; and a plurality of blades supported by the hub, each blade having a proximal end attached to the hub and a distal end, the blades being arranged in at least two blade rows arranged in series in the length direction of the hub. The impeller has a deployed configuration, a stored configuration, and an operational configuration. Each blade in the deployed configuration of the impeller extends away from the hub; at least one of the blades in the stored configuration of the impeller is compressed so as to move the distal end of the at least one blade towards the hub; and at least some of the blades in the operational configuration are deformed from the deployed configuration upon rotation of the impeller when in the deployed configuration.


The impeller may have a first radius in the deployed configuration and a second radius in the stored configuration which is less than half the first radius. The impeller may also have a third radius in the operational configuration, the second radius being less than half the third radius. In preferred embodiments, the impeller in the operational configuration may be operable to pump about 4 liters of fluid per minute.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A and 1B show an impeller in the deployed and stored configurations, respectively;



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates deployment of an impeller;



FIG. 3A illustrates an impeller in a stored configuration, within a storage sleeve;



FIG. 3B illustrates an impeller self-deploying after emerging from a storage sleeve;



FIG. 4 illustrates deployed and operational configurations of an impeller;



FIG. 5 illustrates an impeller design having a low Reynolds number;



FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate an impeller having three blade rows;



FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an impeller blade having a winglet;



FIGS. 8A-8C illustrate possible winglet configurations;



FIG. 8D illustrates possible winglet edge geometries;



FIGS. 9A-9D illustrate an end view of an impeller blade, further illustrating possible winglet configurations;



FIGS. 10A and 10B illustrate a blade having a trench around the proximate end of the blade;



FIG. 11 is a photograph of a molded polymer impeller;



FIG. 12 shows a stress-strain curve for an impeller blade material; and



FIG. 13 shows normalized average fluid shearing stress as a function of tip gap sizes.



FIG. 14 illustrates an example of a discharge region of an expandable impeller pump that can be used for support of the left ventricle.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An impeller according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises a hub, and at least one blade supported by the hub. Embodiments of the present invention include impellers having at least one flexible blade, the impeller having a deployed configuration in which the blade extends away from the hub, and a stored configuration in which the impeller is radially compressed. For example, the blade may be folded in towards the hub, and held there by a storage sleeve such as a metal tube or cannula. In the stored configuration, the distal end of the blade is closer to the hub than in the deployed configuration, and the radius can be significantly less, such as less than half that of the radius in the deployed state. The sleeve may comprise a non-expandable portion, in which the impeller is stored, and an expandable portion, into which the impeller can be moved for deployment. The impeller deploys within the expanded portion of the sleeve.


Impellers according to the present invention may comprise a plurality of blades, arranged in blade rows. The blade rows may be spaced apart along the hub, each blade row including one or more blades. For example, each blade row may comprise two or three blades. Achieving the stored configuration is facilitated by providing multiple blade rows, rather than, for example, a single long blade curving around the hub. A single long blade can be considerably more difficult to fold in towards the hub.


Embodiments of the present invention may further include a sleeve, at least part of the impeller being located within the sleeve, and the fluid flowing through the sleeve when the impeller rotates. The sleeve may be expandable, the sleeve having an expanded configuration when the impeller is in the deployed configuration, and a stored configuration when the impeller is in the stored configuration. The sleeve may act to constrain the impeller in the stored configuration. Alternatively, a separate storage sleeve may be provided, with the impeller and expandable sleeve both expanding when pushed out of the storage sleeve. An expandable sleeve may comprise a metal framework, for example comprising a shape memory alloy. An elastic polymer film may be disposed over the metal framework. Impeller blades may have a winglet at the distal end of the blade, the winglet and the sleeve providing a hydraulic bearing for rotation of the impeller. For example, the sleeve may have a cylindrical inner surface inside which the impeller rotates, the fluid flowing through the sleeve, with the winglet of each blade moving proximate to the cylindrical inner surface as the impeller rotates, the fluid between the winglet and cylindrical inner surface forming the hydraulic bearing for rotation of the impeller.


An impeller may be stored in a storage sleeve, and deployed in a fluid pipe, through which fluid flows when the impeller is rotated. The storage sleeve may have a diameter approximately equal to or less than half the diameter of the fluid pipe. The storage sleeve may be a metal tube in which the impeller is stored prior to deployment. The fluid pipe may be a utility pipe (water, gas, sewage, and the like), bodily vessel (such as a blood vessel), portion of a thrust unit for a vehicle, or other structure through which a fluid may flow. The impeller may be conveyed to a desired location in a stored configuration, then self-deploy to an expanded, deployed state. The stored configuration facilitates conveyance of the impeller to the desired location, enabling it to be passed through openings less than the diameter of the deployed state.


The fluid pipe may be an expanded form of the storage sleeve, expansion of the storage sleeve allowing the impeller to deploy. In this case, the impeller does not need to be pushed out of the sleeve to achieve the deployed configuration. For example, an impeller according to an example of the present invention can be inserted in the stored configuration through a small entrance hole into a pipe of larger diameter. The impeller can be deployed by causing the impeller to move out of the storage sleeve using the drive shaft. The impeller then unfolds into the deployed state using stored strain energy in the blade material.


Rotation of the impeller may further change the blade configuration to an operating configuration. An impeller may have flexible blades that deform into an optimized hydrodynamic shape when rotating and operating under design load conditions.


Embodiments of the present invention include impellers having at least one blade having a winglet. In the operating state, the winglet can improve hydrodynamic performance of the impeller and reduce shear stresses that exist within the fluid. Impellers may include a plurality of blades that facilitate the folding of the blades into the storage state. The blades may be arranged in a plurality of rows of blades that facilitate the folding of the blades into the storage state, compared with folding a single blade extending a similar distance along the hub. The blades and (optionally) the hub may be constructed of a low modulus material such as a polymer. The impeller can be a unitary structure, with the blades and impeller formed from the same material, for example by molding a polymer.


An impeller with a plurality of blade rows also facilitates the input of large values of fluid head or pressure rise. The specific speed of an axial flow impeller according to the present invention may be comparable to the specific speed of mixed flow pumps.


An impeller can be inserted into a pipe in a folded state and subsequently deployed. The impeller, when deployed in a fluid flow pipe, may further deform into an operating configuration when the fluid is being pumped by impeller rotation. At the end of the operation of the impeller, the impeller can be radially compressed back into the stored configuration, for example by re-folding the flexible blades, and extracted through an entrance hole having a diameter less than that of the fluid pipe or deployed configuration. For example, the blades can be refolded and the impeller extracted into a cylindrical storage cavity by means of an attached rotary drive shaft or guide wire.


An impeller according to the present invention can operate in a low Reynolds number pipe flow, where the pipe boundary layer comprises a majority of the flow in the pipe. The Reynolds number of the relative flow over the blades can be low, compared to conventional impellers and pumps.


The impeller can be optimized to operate in a non-Newtonian fluid. The impeller can be optimized to operate in a fluid containing delicate particles (such as emulsion droplets, cells, and the like) that are damaged by excessive shearing stress in the fluid. The impeller can be designed so that the operational configuration is optimized, not necessarily the same as the deployed configuration under no loading.


An impeller with an indentation in the hub about the blade root can have reduced internal mechanical stresses within the blades when in the stored configuration. The indentation may also be used to further reduce fluid shear stress induced by the impeller in the operating state.


The blades can be formed from polymer materials, such as polyurethane. A polymer, such as polyurethane, having a modulus of 10,000 psi can be used. In some examples, the blades may have a stiffness approximating that of a thick rubber band. Hence, the blades have some stiffness but will deform under operating load. For example, the material can be chosen so as to have a linear modulus at operational stresses, allowing predictable deformation under load, and a non-linear modulus at the higher stresses used to fold the blades into the stored configuration.



FIG. 1A shows an impeller in a deployed configuration, the impeller comprising a hub 10 and blades such as blade 12. The impeller has a radius R1, as measured from the central long axis of the hub to the outermost blade tip. Also shown is a fluid flow sleeve 14, through which fluid flows relative to the impeller. The impeller may be used as an axial pump, to pump fluid through the sleeve. Alternatively, the impeller may be used as a motive force provider for a vehicle. For example, the impeller may power a boat, such as a jet-boat, or other water craft, the sleeve being a tube immersed in the water surrounding the vehicle. In this configuration, the blades are deployed.



FIG. 1B shows the impeller in a stored configuration, with blade 12 folded or otherwise deformed towards the hub 10. The radius R2 is less than the radius R1 shown in FIG. 1A.


An impeller according to an embodiment of the present invention has flexible blades 15 that can be folded such that the maximum diameter of the impeller in the folded state is approximately half, or less than half, the diameter of the impeller in the operating state. Referring to FIGS. 1A and 1B, this corresponds to R2≈≤(R1/2).



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating deployment of the impeller. The impeller has hub 20 and blades such as 22, and is retained in the stored configuration by storage sleeve 24. A rotating shaft 30 is used to drive the impeller. The figure also shows a guide wire 28 within the rotating shaft, which can be used to position the impeller, and also to help push the impeller out of the storage sleeve. The storage sleeve may be, for example, a metal tube. Rotation of the shaft may also assist deploying the impeller, for example through twisting the impeller out of the storage sleeve if the inner surface of the storage sleeve has a threaded texture. On the left, a fluid pipe 26 is shown, through which fluid flows when the impeller is deployed and rotated.


An impeller in the stored configuration can be stored in a cylindrical cavity formed by storage sleeve 24 of diameter approximately equal to or less than half the diameter of the fluid pipe 26.


The storage sleeve may be a metal tube in which the impeller is stored prior to deployment. The fluid pipe 26 is any structure through which a fluid may flow relative to the impeller, such as a tube or bodily vessel. The impeller may be conveyed to the desired location within the fluid pipe in the stored configuration, then self-deploy to an expanded, deployed state. The stored configuration allows the impeller to pass through openings having an area less than the area of the deployed state, as swept out by the rotating blades.


Alternatively, the fluid pipe 26 may be an expanded form of the storage sleeve 24, expansion of the constraining sleeve allowing the impeller to deploy. In this case, the impeller does not need to be pushed out of the sleeve to achieve the deployed configuration. For example, an impeller can be inserted into a fluid pipe through a smaller hole, such as a smaller branch pipe or hole in the pipe wall. The impeller can then be deployed by causing the impeller to move out of the storage sleeve using the drive shaft. Deployment may occur without any outside energy input, using stored strain energy in the blades when the blades are in the stored configuration.



FIG. 3A further illustrates an impeller in a stored configuration, showing blades such as blade 34, and hub 30. The blades are kept folded against the hub by the storage sleeve 36. FIG. 3B shows the impeller pushed out of the storage sleeve and self-deployed. The impeller has two rows of blades, as is seen more clearly in the deployed state, the first row including blade 34 and the second row including blade 32.



FIG. 4 shows an impeller comprising hub 60 and a plurality of blades, the blades being shown in both the deployed and operating configurations. The deployed configuration is the blade configuration under no load, and the operating configuration is the configuration when the impeller rotates at the operational rotation speed. The blades are shown at 62A, 64A, and 66A for the deployed configuration. When under load, such as rotating in a fluid, the blades deform to an operational configuration, with the blades at 62B, 64B, and 66B. Rotation of the impeller changes the blade configuration from the deployed configuration (for no load) to an operating configuration. The flexible blades can deform into an optimized hydrodynamic shape when rotating and operating under design load conditions.



FIG. 4 compares the deployed blade shape with the operating blade shape. For a hub and blades formed from the same polymer, simulations showed that the hub also deflects slightly in a rotational manner, as the second blade row is rotated at the root compared to the first blade row. In general, the blades deflect forward as the lift on the blades is such that they create thrust, a force directed towards the left side of the figure, moving the blades toward the right side of the picture. The leading edge of the second blade row is obscured. There are two blade rows, each with two identical blades.


Blade shapes can be optimized using standard computational fluid dynamics analysis (CFD). However, conventionally, the non-rotating, non-loaded configuration is optimized. (If the impeller is not expandable, the deployed shape is the shape of the impeller when not rotating, and there is no stored configuration). An improved impeller has an optimized operational configuration, and an improved method of designing an impeller includes optimizing the operational configuration. A structural computation determines an allowance for deformation under load from the deployed state.



FIG. 5 illustrates an impeller design having a low Reynolds number. The impeller comprises hub 80, and two rows of blades having two blades each. The first row includes blades 82 and 84, and the second row includes blades 86 and 88.


This illustration shows the design elements of a low Reynolds number impeller, where the thickness of the boundary layer on the fluid pipe walls is as thick as the diameter of the pipe. The impeller has highly curved leading and trailing edge lines where the blade pitch angles are adjusted for the local values of relative flow angle. The second row blades have a groove-like feature that takes a helical path from the leading edge to the trailing edge. This is due to variations in the spanwise loading, and allows an axial flow pump using this impeller to achieve a head rise similar to that of a mixed flow pump. The middle of the span of the blade is relatively highly loaded, leading to this feature. The second row blades may be further split into two separated blade rows, and this general feature will still present but not so apparent.



FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate end and side views of an impeller, respectively. The impeller comprises hub 100, a first row of blades comprising blades 102 and 104, a second row of blades comprising blades 106 and 108, and a third row of blades comprising blades 110 and 112.


For a mixed flow impeller of similar performance, the hub diameter is typically much larger, so that folding into a stored diameter half the deployed diameter is impossible.



FIGS. 7A and 7B show side and end views of a blade 120 having a winglet 122 at the distal end. FIG. 7A shows the distal cross-section of the blade as a dashed line. FIG. 7B shows the winglet moving proximate to the inner surface of a fluid flow sleeve, a configuration which may be used as a hydraulic bearing for the impeller.


Impellers may have at least one blade having a winglet. In some embodiments, all blades within a blade row include a winglet; other blades may or may not have a winglet. A winglet can improve hydrodynamic performance of the impeller. A winglet may also reduce shear stresses that exist within the fluid, for example reducing degradation of biological structures such as cells that may exist within the fluid.



FIGS. 8A-8C show possible winglet configurations. An impeller blade typically has a pair of opposed faces: a pressure face inducing relative motion of the fluid through pressure as the blade rotates through the fluid; and a suction face inducing fluid motion by suction. The blade also has a leading edge cutting though the fluid as the blade rotates, a trailing edge, and an outer edge (which may also be referred to as a blade tip or edge of the distal end of the blade). The winglet is supported by the outer edge or blade tip, which has an airfoil shape. As shown, the suction side of the blade is on the right, and the pressure side is on the left.



FIG. 8A shows a suction side winglet, the winglet 142 extending from the suction side of the outer edge of blade 140. This is a view from the leading edge, in cross-section, so that the blade rotates towards the direction of viewing. FIG. 8B shows a pressure side winglet 146, extending from the pressure face of the blade 144. The parameters may be similar to the suction side winglet. The function of the pressure side winglet is to reduce flow through the gap. There is less effect of creating a hydrodynamic bearing, but the pressure side winglet “scrapes” low momentum fluid off the inner surface of the fluid pipe and prevents this fluid from entering the gap and subsequently being used in the core of a tip vortex. This can reduce shearing stresses in the bulk of the fluid flow.



FIG. 8C illustrates a combined winglet, extending from both the pressure and suction sides of the outer edge. Embodiments of the present invention include the configurations shown in FIGS. 8A-8C. Numerical methods can be used to design the winglet configurations. Where the blade chord lengths are long and the blade has a significant helical extent, the geometry and shape of the blade tip and the winglet can become complex.



FIG. 8D shows possible winglet edge geometries which may be used. The figure shows a radius edge 150, sharp edge 152, and chisel edges 154 and 156.



FIGS. 9A-9D further illustrate winglet configurations, the blade supporting the winglet retaining the same shape in these examples. FIG. 9A illustrates the outer edge of a blade 160, not having a winglet.



FIG. 9B shows a pressure side winglet extending the pressure side of the outer blade edge, extending over portion 164. The portion 162 of the winglet corresponds to the original outer edge area of the blade shown in FIG. 9A.



FIG. 9C shows a suction side winglet, the portion 166 extending from the suction side of the outer edge of the blade, and the portion 168 corresponding to the original outer edge of the blade. In embodiments of the present invention, the pressure side of the blade will have a radius of approximately ⅓ to ½ the blade thickness or width. The extent of the winglet may be from ½ to 3 times the blade thickness. A thickness approximately equal to the blade thickness is shown. The winglet is mostly positioned to the downstream half of the blade as shown. The purpose is to create a hydrodynamic bearing where the outer face of the winglet is in close proximity to the inner surface of the fluid pipe in which the blade is operating. Flow in the gap is reduced in strength, and a tip vortex is less likely to form. This reduces shearing stresses in the fluid. The gap can be between approximately 10 to approximately 25 percent of the base blade maximum thickness. The gap is a mostly parallel surface to the pipe of casing. It can be a cylindrical, conical, or curved side cylinder where the radius is a function of the axial position of the blade element. Parameters for the pressure side and combined (described below) winglets may be similar.



FIG. 9D shows a combined pressure side and suction side winglet extending from both the pressure face and the suction face of the blade, the portion 170 extending from the pressure face, the portion 174 extending from the suction face, and a portion 172 corresponding to the original outer edge of the blade.


The winglets are preferably aerodynamically smooth shapes. The winglets have leading edges where flows impact the edges of the winglets, and trailing edges where flow is discharged from the winglet surfaces. Winglets preferably have smooth aerodynamic cross-sections, generally in the direction of the mean flow, which is parallel to the flow direction along the blade tip surfaces.



FIGS. 10A and 10B illustrate the provision of an indentation, in this case a trench, proximate to the base of a blade. FIG. 10A shows blade 180, surrounded by trench 182. The trench is formed in hub 184, and is parallel with and adjacent to the proximal edge of the blade, the proximal edge of the blade extending around the base of the blade where it joins the hub. FIG. 10B is a sectional view, showing the trench 182 and blade 180. The indentation may also be referred to as a “dillet”.


An indentation close to the blade root, such as a trench around some or all of the blade root, can help reduce internal mechanical stresses in the blades when the blades are in the stored configuration, for example folded against the hub. The indentation may also be used to reduce fluid shear stress in the operating state.



FIG. 11 is a photograph of an impeller molded to a configuration according to an embodiment of the present invention. The impeller is a polyurethane impeller taken from a mold, having two blades rows of three blades each.



FIG. 12 is a stress-strain relationship of a non-linear material that can be used to form an impeller according to the present invention. The left (low stress) and right (high stress) filled circles correspond to the impeller operating point and storage conditions, respectively. The stress/strain relationship is approximately linear at the impeller operating point. The storage condition, where the blades are folded against the hub, is within the high strain non-linear portion of the material property curve. This allows the stored configuration to be achieved without passing the material tensile failure point. In example impellers, the maximum material elongation in the stored configuration is approximately 75 percent.


Preferably, a non-linear property material is used for the blades. The blade material can be relatively stiff at operating loads, and the same material relatively flexible at higher strains, for example when the blades are folded in the stored condition. For example, the strain might be 10 percent at operating loads and 75 percent while folded, and the stress/strain curve has high modulus (e.g. 10000) at operating loads, and low modulus (e.g. 1000) at higher loads associated with folding. The stress-strain curve may have two approximately linear regions with a break point between the operating point and the folded point strains.



FIG. 13 illustrates optimization for fluid shear stress for an example impeller. The distal end of the impeller blade moves proximate to the interior surface of a cylindrical sleeve, the tip gap between the blade distal end and the inner diameter of the sleeve being approximately 10 to 50 percent of the maximum thickness of the distal end of the blade.


The curve is double normalized, the design point value being 1.0, the scale being read as a factor times the value of stress at the design point. For example, FIG. 13 illustrates that making the tip gap smaller makes the shear stress higher, whereas making the gap bigger reduces the stress by a smaller factor. Therefore, the fluid shear stress can be reduced without significantly impacting pumping efficiency.


Impellers according to embodiments of the present invention may be compressed and packaged into a storage sleeve, such as a metal tube, catheter, or other structure, for insertion into an object. For an object such as a living subject, the diameter of the storage sleeve can be approximately three to four millimeters, or less. Having inserted the device, the impeller can be deployed in situ into a geometry that may be approximately six to seven millimeters in diameter. The impeller then can be rotated using a flexible drive shaft coupled to a drive motor external to the subject. Impellers according to the present invention can be inserted in the stored state, then deployed into an expanded configuration (relative to the stored state) and are capable of pumping 4 liters per minute, for example, as a medical assist device. In a representative example of such a device, the impeller rotates at approximately 30,000 RPM. The impeller may comprise two or more airfoil shaped blades that form an axial flow pump. The impeller may be positioned using a guide wire and rotated using a flexible shaft. The guide wire may run within a hollow center of the flexible shaft, and the hollow center may also convey saline solution or other fluid for infusion, cooling, and/or lubrication purposes. The guide wire may be removed, if desired. Implantation into a living subject can be achieved through a cannula having a diameter of 3-4 mm, without surgical intervention. For medical implantation, a drive shaft comprising a metal braid, or a polymer or composite material braid, can be used, and the drive shaft diameter may be of the order ½ to 2 millimeters, and may be hollow to allow a guide wire to pass through.


In further embodiments, the sleeve has expandable and non-expandable portions. The impeller is stored within the non-expandable portion for insertion. When the impeller is located at or near the desired location, the impeller is then urged out of the non-expandable portion of the sleeve into the expandable portion. The stored elastic energy within the flexible blades of the impeller induces self-deployment of the impeller, and also the expansion of the expandable portion of the sleeve. The expanded sleeve then may have the role of a fluid flow pipe, through which fluid flows when the impeller is rotated. The expandable sleeve may comprise a metal or polymer mesh, or woven fibers, and a smooth sheathing to provide a flexible, expandable tube.


An expandable sleeve may comprise a mesh formed from a flexible material, such as polymers, metals, or other material. In one example, the mesh is made from nitinol, a memory metal alloy. A thin sheet or cylinder of the metal, of a thickness on the order of a thousandth of an inch, is cut using a laser so as to leave a mesh structure. Alternatively, the mesh can be formed from a polymer. Other suitable materials for the mesh include other metals (such as alloys, including memory metal alloy), polymers, and the like. A coating, such an elastic coating, is then provided over the mesh. For example, an elastic polymer such as Estane™ can be used, or other polyurethane.


Hence, the expandable sleeve may comprise a mesh, such as a matrix of woven wires, or a machined metal cylinder with laser cut voids representing the spaces between wires, or another material that when deformed in one direction would elongate in the perpendicular direction. The mesh can then be covered with a thin film of elastane to form a fluid flow pipe through which the fluid flows. The mesh can be formed as a cylinder with flow entrance voids at the distal end and flow discharge voids at the proximal end, the proximal end being closer to the point of insertion into an object, such as a pipe or living subject. FIG. 14 illustrates an example of an expandable sleeve 200 where the discharge end is located proximal the impeller. The discharge end has an open region 204 that is not covered by an elastic coating, e.g., a thin film of elastane. The open region 200 has a hexagonal mesh in certain embodiments and impeller 208. As the sleeve is shortened in length, for example using a guide wire, the cylinder expands to a greater diameter, allowing a greater flow rate. A hexagonal cell matrix design, or other design, can be used for the mesh. A coating (for example, biocompatible, corrosion resistant, or flow improving) can be applied to the sleeve, for example by solution casting.


The orientation of the mesh or woven fibers of the sleeve can be chosen to allow two stable configurations, stored and deployed. In one example, designed for subject implantation in the stored position, the expandable sleeve in the deployed configuration was approximately 20-30 cm long and the diameter was approximately 6-7 mm. This diameter allowed for higher fluid flow rate and reduced friction pressure losses. In the stored configuration, the expandable portion was elongated by approximately 30 percent relative to the deployed configuration, and the diameter was approximately 3 mm. The final portion (distal end) of the assembly comprises a second set of openings and plates, providing an inlet or opening for the influx of fluid to be pumped. The sleeve may also provide a guide wire attachment opening for fluid discharge. A short (such as 1 cm) section of the sleeve may contain linear elements (vanes) arranged about the central axis of the sleeve, through which fluid is discharged. The vanes may act as stationary stator blades and remove swirl velocity from the impeller discharge flow. The vanes may be manufactured with airfoil type cross-sections. Applications of an impeller deploying within an expandable sleeve include a collapsible fire hose with an integral booster pump, a collapsible propulsor, a biomedical pump for a biological fluid, and the like.


The impeller blade can be designed so as to minimize destruction of delicate particles (such as emulsion droplets, suspensions, biological structures such as cells, and the like) within a fluid. A CFD model was used to simulate the shear stresses experienced by particles passing through a simulated impeller. Time integrations of intermediate shear stresses experienced by the particles were used to provide an estimated probability of cell destruction in a biomedical application. A split blade design, in which there are a plurality of blade rows such as discussed above, reduces the residency time that cells remain in intermediate shear stress regions, allowing an advantageous reduction in cell or other particle destruction compared with conventional impeller designs.


Impeller blades may, for example, occupy as much as 95% of the compressed volume of the impeller when the impeller is in the stored state. The blades may be formed from a rubbery, elastic, or other resilient material that has sufficient resilience to expand when ejected from a sleeve. In other examples, the blades may be formed from other flexible polymers, an expandable foam optionally with a skin, or other compressible or deformable materials including metals.


Impellers according to embodiments of the present invention may have multiple separate sets of blades, rather than a long, continuous, spiral blade. Prior art impellers typically have a continuous long helical blade that is difficult to fold up against the hub. By splitting a long blade into two or three shorter sections, the blade can be more easily folded into a cylindrical volume or space and subsequently deployed when properly located. The number of blade rows can be one, two, three, four, five, or higher. The twist pitch angles may be variable.


One approach to impeller design provides a two blade impeller with blades exhibiting a significant degree of wrap around the central hub. However, the three-dimensional shape of the blades limits the degree to which they can be folded without deforming or breaking. By breaking a single blade row into two, three (or possibly more) rows of blades that exhibit minimum wrap around the hub, the blades have a more two-dimensional shape, allowing easier bending during the storage process. The combination of three or two blade rows can produce the same flow and pressure as a single blade row. An axial pump was designed with two blade rows, and CFD (computational fluid dynamics) analysis indicated that this pump design was adequate for use in a medical assist application. A model was constructed of a flexible polyurethane material and successfully folded into a metal sleeve.


Impellers can be used with flows of very small Reynolds number, for example, the pumping of relatively viscous fluids at low velocity or flow rate. Very small impeller pumps, on the order of 6 mm diameter, may be fabricated from a polymer and extracted from a precision mold. This allows production of impellers at very low cost. The use of polymer blades allows the pump impellers to be extracted from molds without becoming mold-locked, and allows the use of one-piece molds, instead of multi-part or split molds. This can be advantageous for pumping small quantities of bio-fluids. Impellers may be used for flows of typical Reynolds numbers as well. Impeller diameters can also be in the range of several inches to several feet.


Applications of the improved impeller designs described include pumps for chemical engineering, propellers for airborne or maritime vessels, water pumps, and the like. Improved impeller designs are useful for any application where an impeller is to be stored in a compact configuration. Impellers may be formed from metal sheets, plastic, and non-resilient materials, for example, in foldable configurations. Deployment may include the use of motors or other mechanical devices to unfold blades, automatic deployment induced by centrifugal forces, and the like. Examples of the present invention include a device locatable inside a subject so as to pump a fluid, the device being inserted into the subject in an insertion configuration having an insertion cross-section, the device operating inside the subject in an operating configuration having an operating cross-section, wherein the operating cross-section is greater than the insertion cross-section.


The operating diameter (of the largest circle swept out by the outer edge of the impeller blade as it rotates) may be over 50% greater than the insertion diameter of the impeller, and may be over 100% greater than the insertion diameter.


The invention is not restricted to the illustrative examples described above. Examples are not intended as limitations on the scope of the invention. Methods, apparatus, compositions, and the like described herein are exemplary and not intended as limitations on the scope of the invention. Changes therein and other uses will occur to those skilled in the art. The scope of the invention is defined by the scope of the claims.


Patents, patent applications, or publications mentioned in this specification are incorporated herein by reference to the same extent as if each individual document was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

Claims
  • 1. A catheter pump comprising: an expandable sleeve defining a fluid flow path and comprising a mesh and an elastic coating applied over the mesh, wherein the mesh includes voids disposed in a cylindrical body and the elastic coating covers the voids to form a fluid flow pipe, said fluid flow path disposed between inlets and outlets of the pump, the expandable sleeve configured to collapse from a deployed configuration to a stored configuration;an impeller comprising a hub and a plurality of impeller blades supported thereby, the plurality of impeller blades arranged in at least two blade rows arranged axially along the hub to enable collapse of the plurality of impeller blades from the deployed configuration to the stored configuration, the impeller positioned within at least a portion of the expandable sleeve and configured to induce a fluid flow along the fluid flow path when in the deployed configuration, wherein each blade row of the at least two blade rows comprises a plurality of blades; anda plurality of vanes disposed in the fluid flow path and configured to remove swirl velocity of the fluid flow when the expandable sleeve and the plurality of impeller blades are in the deployed configuration.
  • 2. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein the mesh substantially surrounds the impeller.
  • 3. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein the expandable sleeve encloses the fluid flow path.
  • 4. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein the impeller is expandable from a stored configuration to a deployed configuration.
  • 5. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein the mesh is arranged such that the expandable sleeve has a stored configuration and a deployed configuration, the expandable sleeve movable from the stored configuration to the deployed configuration and further movable from the deployed configuration to the stored configuration.
  • 6. The catheter pump of claim 1, further comprising a storage sleeve, wherein the impeller and the expandable sleeve are configured to expand when urged out of the storage sleeve.
  • 7. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein the outlet is defined in a transition region between the expandable sleeve surrounding the impeller and a non-expandable elongate member, the non-expandable elongate member extending proximally from the transition region.
  • 8. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein the expandable sleeve defines a fluid pipe through which blood flows when the impeller is rotated.
  • 9. The catheter pump of claim 1, further comprising an elongate body coupled with a proximal portion of the expandable sleeve, the elongate body configured to extend proximally from the expandable sleeve to outside a patient during operation of the catheter pump.
  • 10. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein the plurality of vanes comprise linear elements.
  • 11. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein the plurality of vanes are disposed about a central axis of the sleeve.
  • 12. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein the plurality of vanes comprise airfoil type cross-sections.
  • 13. The catheter pump of claim 1, wherein a distal end of at least one of the plurality of blades includes a winglet.
  • 14. A catheter pump comprising: a cannula defining a fluid flow path and comprising an expandable sleeve, a transition region proximal of the expandable sleeve, and a non-expandable elongate member extending proximal from the transition region, the fluid flow path disposed between inlets and outlets of the cannula, the outlets defined in the transition region, the expandable sleeve comprising a mesh and configured to collapse from a deployed configuration to a stored configuration;an impeller comprising a hub and a plurality of impeller blades supported thereby, the plurality of impeller blades arranged in at least two blade rows arranged axially along the hub to enable collapse of the plurality of impeller blades from the deployed configuration to the stored configuration, the impeller positioned within at least a portion of the expandable sleeve and configured to induce a fluid flow along the fluid flow path when in the deployed configuration; anda plurality of vanes disposed in the fluid flow path and configured to remove swirl velocity of the fluid flow when the expandable sleeve and the plurality of impeller blades are in the deployed configuration.
  • 15. The catheter pump of claim 14, wherein the impeller is expandable from a stored configuration to a deployed configuration.
  • 16. The catheter pump of claim 14, wherein the mesh is arranged such that the expandable sleeve has a stored configuration and a deployed configuration, the expandable sleeve movable from the stored configuration to the deployed configuration and further movable from the deployed configuration to the stored configuration.
  • 17. The catheter pump of claim 14, further comprising a storage sleeve, wherein the impeller and the expandable sleeve are configured to expand when the cannula is urged out of the storage sleeve.
  • 18. The catheter pump of claim 14, wherein the plurality of vanes comprise linear elements.
  • 19. The catheter pump of claim 14, wherein the plurality of vanes are disposed about a central axis of the expandable sleeve.
  • 20. The catheter pump of claim 14, wherein the plurality of vanes comprise airfoil type cross-sections.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/740,042, filed Jan. 11, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,992,163, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/072,624, filed Mar. 25, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,376,707, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/157,267, filed Jun. 9, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,927,068, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/227,277, filed Sep. 15, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,393,181, which claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/610,938, filed Sep. 17, 2004, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety and for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (477)
Number Name Date Kind
1902418 Pilgrim Mar 1933 A
2356659 Aguiar Oct 1942 A
2649052 Weyer Aug 1953 A
2664050 Abresch Dec 1953 A
2684035 Kemp Jul 1954 A
2789511 Warren Apr 1957 A
2896926 Chapman Jul 1959 A
2935068 Donaldson May 1960 A
3080824 Boyd et al. Mar 1963 A
3455540 Marcmann Jul 1969 A
3510229 Smith May 1970 A
3812812 Hurwitz May 1974 A
3860968 Shapiro Jan 1975 A
3904901 Renard et al. Sep 1975 A
3995617 Watkins et al. Dec 1976 A
4115040 Knorr Sep 1978 A
4129129 Amrine Dec 1978 A
4135253 Reich et al. Jan 1979 A
4143425 Runge Mar 1979 A
4149535 Volder Apr 1979 A
4304524 Coxon et al. Dec 1981 A
4382199 Isaacson May 1983 A
4392836 Sugawara Jun 1983 A
4458366 MacGregor Jul 1984 A
4540402 Aigner Sep 1985 A
4560375 Schulte et al. Dec 1985 A
4589822 Clausen et al. May 1986 A
4625712 Wampler Dec 1986 A
4655745 Corbett Apr 1987 A
4686982 Nash Aug 1987 A
4696667 Masch Sep 1987 A
4704121 Moise Nov 1987 A
4728319 Masch Mar 1988 A
4753221 Kensey et al. Jun 1988 A
4769006 Papantonakos Sep 1988 A
4817586 Wampler Apr 1989 A
4846152 Wampler et al. Jul 1989 A
4895557 Moise et al. Jan 1990 A
4900227 Trouplin Feb 1990 A
4902272 Milder et al. Feb 1990 A
4906229 Wampler Mar 1990 A
4908012 Moise et al. Mar 1990 A
4919647 Nash Apr 1990 A
4944722 Carriker et al. Jul 1990 A
4955856 Phillips Sep 1990 A
4957504 Chardack Sep 1990 A
4964864 Summers et al. Oct 1990 A
4969865 Hwang et al. Nov 1990 A
4976270 Parl et al. Dec 1990 A
4985014 Orejola Jan 1991 A
4994017 Yozu Feb 1991 A
4995857 Arnold Feb 1991 A
5000177 Hoffman et al. Mar 1991 A
5021048 Buckholtz Jun 1991 A
5045072 Castillo et al. Sep 1991 A
5049134 Golding et al. Sep 1991 A
5061256 Wampler Oct 1991 A
5089016 Millner et al. Feb 1992 A
5092844 Schwartz et al. Mar 1992 A
5098256 Smith Mar 1992 A
5106368 Uldall et al. Apr 1992 A
5112200 Isaacson et al. May 1992 A
5112292 Hwang et al. May 1992 A
5112349 Summers et al. May 1992 A
5129883 Black Jul 1992 A
5142155 Mauze et al. Aug 1992 A
5147186 Buckholtz Sep 1992 A
5163910 Schwartz et al. Nov 1992 A
5169378 Figuera Dec 1992 A
5171212 Buck et al. Dec 1992 A
5190528 Fonger et al. Mar 1993 A
5201679 Velte et al. Apr 1993 A
5211546 Isaacson et al. May 1993 A
5221270 Parker Jun 1993 A
5234407 Teirstein et al. Aug 1993 A
5234416 Macaulay et al. Aug 1993 A
5290227 Pasque Mar 1994 A
5300112 Barr Apr 1994 A
5312341 Turi May 1994 A
5344443 Palma et al. Sep 1994 A
5346458 Affeld Sep 1994 A
5360317 Clausen et al. Nov 1994 A
5376114 Jarvik Dec 1994 A
5393197 Lemont et al. Feb 1995 A
5393207 Maher et al. Feb 1995 A
5405341 Martin Apr 1995 A
5405383 Barr Apr 1995 A
5415637 Khosravi May 1995 A
5437541 Vainrub et al. Aug 1995 A
5449342 Hirose et al. Sep 1995 A
5458459 Hubbard et al. Oct 1995 A
5490763 Abrams et al. Feb 1996 A
5505701 Anaya Fernandez de Lomana Apr 1996 A
5527159 Bozeman, Jr. et al. Jun 1996 A
5533957 Aldea Jul 1996 A
5534287 Lukic Jul 1996 A
5554114 Wallace et al. Sep 1996 A
5588812 Taylor et al. Dec 1996 A
5609574 Kaplan et al. Mar 1997 A
5613935 Jarvik Mar 1997 A
5643226 Cosgrove et al. Jul 1997 A
5678306 Bozeman, Jr. et al. Oct 1997 A
5692882 Bozeman et al. Dec 1997 A
5702418 Ravenscroft Dec 1997 A
5704926 Sutton Jan 1998 A
5707218 Maher et al. Jan 1998 A
5722930 Larson et al. Mar 1998 A
5725513 Ju et al. Mar 1998 A
5725570 Heath Mar 1998 A
5730628 Hawkins Mar 1998 A
5735897 Buirge Apr 1998 A
5738649 Macoviak Apr 1998 A
5741234 Aboul-Hosn Apr 1998 A
5741429 Donadio, III et al. Apr 1998 A
5746709 Rom et al. May 1998 A
5749855 Reitan May 1998 A
5755784 Jarvik May 1998 A
5776111 Tesio Jul 1998 A
5776161 Globerman Jul 1998 A
5776190 Jarvik Jul 1998 A
5779721 Nash Jul 1998 A
5807311 Palestrant Sep 1998 A
5814011 Corace Sep 1998 A
5824070 Jarvik Oct 1998 A
5851174 Jarvik et al. Dec 1998 A
5859482 Crowell et al. Jan 1999 A
5868702 Stevens Feb 1999 A
5868703 Bertolero Feb 1999 A
5888241 Jarvik Mar 1999 A
5888242 Antaki et al. Mar 1999 A
5911685 Siess et al. Jun 1999 A
5921913 Siess Jul 1999 A
5941813 Sievers et al. Aug 1999 A
5951263 Taylor et al. Sep 1999 A
5957941 Ream Sep 1999 A
5964694 Siess et al. Oct 1999 A
6007478 Siess et al. Dec 1999 A
6007479 Rottenberg et al. Dec 1999 A
6015272 Antaki et al. Jan 2000 A
6015434 Yamane Jan 2000 A
6018208 Maher et al. Jan 2000 A
6027863 Donadio, III et al. Feb 2000 A
6053705 Schob et al. Apr 2000 A
6056719 Mickley May 2000 A
6058593 Siess May 2000 A
6059760 Sandmore et al. May 2000 A
6068610 Ellis et al. May 2000 A
6071093 Hart Jun 2000 A
6083260 Aboul-Hosn Jul 2000 A
6086527 Talpade Jul 2000 A
6086570 Aboul-Hosn et al. Jul 2000 A
6106494 Saravia et al. Aug 2000 A
6113536 Aboul-Hosn et al. Sep 2000 A
6123659 Le Blanc et al. Sep 2000 A
6123725 Aboul-Hosn Sep 2000 A
6132363 Freed et al. Oct 2000 A
6135943 Yu et al. Oct 2000 A
6136025 Barbut et al. Oct 2000 A
6139487 Siess Oct 2000 A
6152704 Aboul-Hosn et al. Nov 2000 A
6162194 Shipp Dec 2000 A
6176822 Nix et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176848 Rau et al. Jan 2001 B1
6186665 Maher et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190304 Downey et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190357 Ferrari et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200260 Bolling Mar 2001 B1
6210133 Aboul-Hosn et al. Apr 2001 B1
6210318 Lederman Apr 2001 B1
6210397 Aboul-Hosn et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214846 Elliott Apr 2001 B1
6217541 Yu Apr 2001 B1
6227797 Watterson et al. May 2001 B1
6228063 Aboul-Hosn May 2001 B1
6234960 Aboul-Hosn et al. May 2001 B1
6234995 Peacock, III May 2001 B1
6245007 Bedingham et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245026 Campbell et al. Jun 2001 B1
6247892 Kazatchkov et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248091 Wolfram Jun 2001 B1
6254359 Aber Jul 2001 B1
6254564 Wilk et al. Jul 2001 B1
6287319 Aboul-Hosn et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287336 Globerman et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295877 Aboul-Hosn et al. Oct 2001 B1
6299635 Frantzen Oct 2001 B1
6305962 Maher et al. Oct 2001 B1
6387037 Bolling et al. May 2002 B1
6395026 Aboul-Hosn et al. May 2002 B1
6413222 Pantages et al. Jul 2002 B1
6422990 Prem Jul 2002 B1
6425007 Messinger Jul 2002 B1
6428464 Bolling Aug 2002 B1
6447441 Yu et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454775 Demarais et al. Sep 2002 B1
6468298 Pelton Oct 2002 B1
6503224 Forman et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508777 Macoviak et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508787 Erbel et al. Jan 2003 B2
6517315 Belady Feb 2003 B2
6517528 Pantages et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527699 Goldowsky Mar 2003 B1
6532964 Aboul-Hosn et al. Mar 2003 B2
6533716 Schmitz-Rode et al. Mar 2003 B1
6544216 Sammler et al. Apr 2003 B1
6547519 de Blanc et al. Apr 2003 B2
6565598 Lootz May 2003 B1
6609883 Woodard et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610004 Viole et al. Aug 2003 B2
6613008 Aboul-Hosn et al. Sep 2003 B2
6616323 McGill Sep 2003 B2
6623420 Reich et al. Sep 2003 B2
6623475 Siess Sep 2003 B1
6641093 Coudrais Nov 2003 B2
6641558 Aboul-Hosn et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645241 Strecker Nov 2003 B1
6652548 Evans et al. Nov 2003 B2
6660014 Demarais et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673105 Chen Jan 2004 B1
6692318 McBride Feb 2004 B2
6709418 Aboul-Hosn et al. Mar 2004 B1
6716189 Jarvik et al. Apr 2004 B1
6749598 Keren et al. Jun 2004 B1
6776578 Belady Aug 2004 B2
6776794 Hong et al. Aug 2004 B1
6783328 Lucke et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790171 Grundeman et al. Sep 2004 B1
6794784 Takahashi et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794789 Siess et al. Sep 2004 B2
6814713 Aboul-Hosn et al. Nov 2004 B2
6817836 Nose et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818001 Wulfman et al. Nov 2004 B2
6860713 Hoover Mar 2005 B2
6866625 Avre et al. Mar 2005 B1
6866805 Hong et al. Mar 2005 B2
6887215 McWeeney May 2005 B2
6889082 Bolling et al. May 2005 B2
6901289 Dahl et al. May 2005 B2
6926662 Aboul-Hosn et al. Aug 2005 B1
6935344 Aboul-Hosn et al. Aug 2005 B1
6942611 Siess Sep 2005 B2
6949066 Bearnson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6966748 Woodard et al. Nov 2005 B2
6972956 Franz et al. Dec 2005 B2
6974436 Aboul-Hosn et al. Dec 2005 B1
6981942 Khaw et al. Jan 2006 B2
6984392 Bechert et al. Jan 2006 B2
7010954 Siess et al. Mar 2006 B2
7011620 Siess Mar 2006 B1
7014417 Salomon Mar 2006 B2
7022100 Aboul-Hosn et al. Apr 2006 B1
7027875 Siess et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037069 Arnold et al. May 2006 B2
7070555 Siess Jul 2006 B2
7122019 Kesten et al. Oct 2006 B1
7125376 Viole et al. Oct 2006 B2
7144365 Bolling et al. Dec 2006 B2
7150711 Nusser et al. Dec 2006 B2
7160243 Medvedev Jan 2007 B2
7172551 Leasure Feb 2007 B2
7175588 Morello Feb 2007 B2
7229258 Wood et al. Jun 2007 B2
7241257 Ainsworth et al. Jul 2007 B1
7262531 Li et al. Aug 2007 B2
7264606 Jarvik et al. Sep 2007 B2
7267667 Houde et al. Sep 2007 B2
7284956 Nose et al. Oct 2007 B2
7288111 Holloway et al. Oct 2007 B1
7290929 Smith et al. Nov 2007 B2
7329236 Keren et al. Feb 2008 B2
7331921 Viole et al. Feb 2008 B2
7335192 Keren et al. Feb 2008 B2
7341570 Keren et al. Mar 2008 B2
7381179 Aboul-Hosn et al. Jun 2008 B2
7393181 McBride et al. Jul 2008 B2
7396327 Morello Jul 2008 B2
7469716 Parrino et al. Dec 2008 B2
7491163 Viole et al. Feb 2009 B2
7534258 Gomez May 2009 B2
7605298 Bechert et al. Oct 2009 B2
7619560 Penna Nov 2009 B2
7633193 Masoudipour et al. Dec 2009 B2
7645225 Medvedev et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657324 Westlund et al. Feb 2010 B2
7682673 Houston et al. Mar 2010 B2
7722568 Lenker et al. May 2010 B2
7731675 Aboul-Hosn et al. Jun 2010 B2
7736296 Siess et al. Jun 2010 B2
7758521 Morris et al. Jul 2010 B2
7766892 Keren et al. Aug 2010 B2
7780628 Keren et al. Aug 2010 B1
7785246 Aboul-Hosn et al. Aug 2010 B2
7811279 John Oct 2010 B2
7819833 Ainsworth et al. Oct 2010 B2
7820205 Takakusagi et al. Oct 2010 B2
7828710 Shifflette Nov 2010 B2
7841976 McBride et al. Nov 2010 B2
7878967 Khanal Feb 2011 B1
7918828 Lundgaard et al. Apr 2011 B2
7927068 McBride et al. Apr 2011 B2
7935102 Breznock et al. May 2011 B2
7942804 Khaw May 2011 B2
7942844 Moberg et al. May 2011 B2
7955365 Doty Jun 2011 B2
7993259 Kang et al. Aug 2011 B2
7998054 Bolling Aug 2011 B2
7998190 Gharib et al. Aug 2011 B2
8012079 Delgado Sep 2011 B2
8025647 Siess et al. Sep 2011 B2
8079948 Shifflette Dec 2011 B2
8110267 Houston et al. Feb 2012 B2
8114008 Hidaka et al. Feb 2012 B2
8123669 Siess et al. Feb 2012 B2
8177703 Smith et al. May 2012 B2
8206350 Mann et al. Jun 2012 B2
8209015 Glenn Jun 2012 B2
8216122 Kung Jul 2012 B2
8235943 Breznock et al. Aug 2012 B2
8236040 Mayberry et al. Aug 2012 B2
8236044 Robaina Aug 2012 B2
8255050 Mohl Aug 2012 B2
8257312 Duffy Sep 2012 B2
8262619 Chebator et al. Sep 2012 B2
8277470 Demarais et al. Oct 2012 B2
8317715 Belleville et al. Nov 2012 B2
8329913 Murata et al. Dec 2012 B2
8333687 Farnan et al. Dec 2012 B2
8348991 Weber et al. Jan 2013 B2
8364278 Pianca et al. Jan 2013 B2
8376707 McBride et al. Feb 2013 B2
8382818 Davis et al. Feb 2013 B2
8388565 Shifflette Mar 2013 B2
8409128 Ferrari Apr 2013 B2
8414645 Dwork et al. Apr 2013 B2
8439859 Pfeffer et al. May 2013 B2
8449443 Rodefeld May 2013 B2
8485961 Campbell et al. Jul 2013 B2
8489190 Pfeffer et al. Jul 2013 B2
8535211 Campbell et al. Sep 2013 B2
8540615 Aboul-Hosn et al. Sep 2013 B2
8545379 Marseille et al. Oct 2013 B2
8545380 Farnan et al. Oct 2013 B2
8579858 Reitan Nov 2013 B2
8585572 Mehmanesh Nov 2013 B2
8591393 Walters et al. Nov 2013 B2
8597170 Walters et al. Dec 2013 B2
8617239 Reitan Dec 2013 B2
8684904 Campbell et al. Apr 2014 B2
8690749 Nunez Apr 2014 B1
8721516 Scheckel May 2014 B2
8721517 Zeng et al. May 2014 B2
8727959 Reitan et al. May 2014 B2
8734331 Evans et al. May 2014 B2
8784441 Rosenbluth et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790236 LaRose et al. Jul 2014 B2
8795576 Tao et al. Aug 2014 B2
8801590 Mohl Aug 2014 B2
8814776 Hastie et al. Aug 2014 B2
8814933 Siess Aug 2014 B2
8849398 Evans Sep 2014 B2
8944748 Liebing Feb 2015 B2
8992163 McBride Mar 2015 B2
8992406 Corbett Mar 2015 B2
8998792 Scheckel Apr 2015 B2
9028216 Schumacher et al. May 2015 B2
9089634 Schumacher et al. Jul 2015 B2
9089670 Scheckel Jul 2015 B2
9217442 Wiessler et al. Dec 2015 B2
9308302 Zeng Apr 2016 B2
9314558 Er Apr 2016 B2
9327067 Zeng et al. May 2016 B2
9328741 Liebing May 2016 B2
9358330 Schumacher Jun 2016 B2
20020107506 McGuckin, Jr. et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030018380 Craig et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030205233 Aboul-Hosn et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030208097 Aboul-Hosn et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030231959 Snider Dec 2003 A1
20050049696 Siess et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050085683 Bolling et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050113631 Bolling et al. May 2005 A1
20050137680 Ortiz et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165269 Aboul-Hosn et al. Jul 2005 A9
20050250975 Carrier et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060018943 Bechert et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060058869 Olson et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060063965 Aboul-Hosn et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060089521 Chang Apr 2006 A1
20060155158 Aboul-Hosn Jul 2006 A1
20060264695 Viole et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060270894 Viole et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070100314 Keren et al. May 2007 A1
20080004645 To et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080103442 Kesten et al. May 2008 A1
20080103516 Wulfman et al. May 2008 A1
20080119943 Armstrong et al. May 2008 A1
20080132748 Shifflete Jun 2008 A1
20080167679 Papp Jul 2008 A1
20080275290 Viole et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090018567 Escudero et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024085 To et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090099638 Grewe Apr 2009 A1
20090112312 LaRose et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118567 Siess May 2009 A1
20090182188 Marseille et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090234378 Escudero et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100030186 Stivland Feb 2010 A1
20100041939 Siess Feb 2010 A1
20100127871 Pontin May 2010 A1
20100210895 Aboul-Hosn et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100268017 Siess Oct 2010 A1
20100274330 Burwell et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100286791 Goldsmith Nov 2010 A1
20110071338 McBride et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110076439 Zeilon Mar 2011 A1
20110152906 Escudero et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110152907 Escudero et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110237863 Ricci et al. Sep 2011 A1
20120004495 Bolling Jan 2012 A1
20120029265 LaRose et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059213 Spence Mar 2012 A1
20120142994 Toellner Jun 2012 A1
20120172654 Bates Jul 2012 A1
20120178986 Campbell et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120184803 Simon et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120224970 Schumacher et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120226097 Smith et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120234411 Scheckel Sep 2012 A1
20120245404 Smith et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120265002 Roehn et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130041202 Toellner Feb 2013 A1
20130053622 Corbett Feb 2013 A1
20130053623 Evans et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130066140 McBride et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130085318 Toellner Apr 2013 A1
20130096364 Reichenbach et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130103063 Escudero et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130106212 Nakazumi et al. May 2013 A1
20130129503 McBride et al. May 2013 A1
20130138205 Kushwaha et al. May 2013 A1
20130204362 Toellner et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130209292 Baykut et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130237744 Pfeffer et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130245360 Schumacher Sep 2013 A1
20130303969 Keenan et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130303970 Keenan et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130331639 Campbell et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130345492 Pfeffer et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140005467 Farnan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140010686 Tanner et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140012065 Fitzgerald et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140039465 Schulz et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140088455 Christensen et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140148638 LaRose et al. May 2014 A1
20140163664 Goldsmith Jun 2014 A1
20140255176 Bredenbreuker et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140275725 Schenck et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140275726 Zeng et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140301822 Scheckel Oct 2014 A1
20140303596 Schumacher et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150025558 Wulfman et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150031936 LaRose et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150051435 Siess et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150051436 Spanier et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150080743 Siess Mar 2015 A1
20150087890 Spanier et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150141738 Toellner et al. May 2015 A1
20150141739 Hsu et al. May 2015 A1
20150151032 Voskoboynikov Jun 2015 A1
20150209498 Franono et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150250935 Anderson et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150290372 Muller et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150343179 Schumacher et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160184500 Zeng Jun 2016 A1
20160250399 Tiller et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160250400 Schumacher et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160256620 Scheckel et al. Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
2701810 Apr 2009 CA
29804046 Apr 1998 DE
0 533 432 Sep 1992 EP
1034808 Sep 2000 EP
1 207 934 May 2002 EP
1 591 079 Nov 2005 EP
2 298 374 Mar 2011 EP
2 263 732 Dec 2012 EP
1310620 Nov 1962 FR
2267800 Apr 1974 FR
2 239 675 Jul 1991 GB
S48-23295 Mar 1973 JP
06-114101 Apr 1994 JP
10-099447 Apr 1998 JP
500877 Sep 2002 TW
WO 8905164 Jun 1989 WO
WO 9526695 Oct 1995 WO
WO 9715228 May 1997 WO
WO 9737697 Oct 1997 WO
WO 0012148 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0019097 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0043062 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0069489 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0117581 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0124867 Apr 2001 WO
WO 02070039 Sep 2002 WO
WO 03103745 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2005089674 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005123158 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2009073037 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009076460 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2010127871 Nov 2010 WO
WO 2010133567 Nov 2010 WO
WO 2010149393 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2011035926 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011035929 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011039091 Apr 2011 WO
WO 2011076439 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2011089022 Jul 2011 WO
WO 2012007140 Jan 2012 WO
WO 2012007141 Jan 2012 WO
WO 2013160407 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2014019274 Feb 2014 WO
WO 2015063277 May 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (92)
Entry
Abiomed, “Impella 5.0 with the Impella Console, Circulatory Support System, Instructions for Use & Clinical Reference Manual,” Jun. 2010, in 122 pages.
Abiomed—Recovering Hearts. Saving Lives., Impella 2.5 System, Instructions for Use, Jul. 2007, in 86 sheets.
Barras et al., “Nitinol-Its Use in Vascular Surgery and Other Applications,” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg., 2000, pp. 564-569; vol. 19.
Biscarini et al., “Enhanced Nitinol Properties for Biomedical Applications,” Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering, 2008, pp. 180-196, vol. 1(3).
Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs) Fact Sheet No. 317; World Health Organization [Online], Sep. 2011. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/index.html, accessed on Aug. 29, 2012.
Duerig et a., “An Overview of Nitinol Medical Applications,” Materials Science Engineering, 1999, pp. 149-160; vol. A273.
European Search Report received in European Patent Application No. 05799883.3, dated May 10, 2011, in 4 pages.
Extended European Search Report received in European Patent Application No. 07753903.9, dated Oct. 8, 2012, in 7 pages.
Federal and Drug Administration 510(k) Summary for Predicate Device IMPELLA 2.5 (K112892), prepared Sep. 5, 2012.
Grech, “Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. I: History and Development,” BMJ., May 17, 2003, pp. 1080-1082, vol. 326.
Hsu et al., “Review of Recent Patents on Foldable Ventricular Assist Devices,” Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering, 2012, pp. 208-222, vol. 5.
Ide et al., “Evaluation of the Pulsatility of a New Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assist Device-the Integrated Cardioassist Catheter-in Dogs,” J. of Thorac and Cardiovasc Sur, Feb. 1994, pp. 569-0575, vol. 107(2).
Ide et al., “Hemodynamic Evaluation of a New Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Integrated Cardioassist Catheter as a Pulsatile Left Ventricle-Femoral Artery Bypass,” Blackwell Scientific Publications, Inc., 1992, pp. 286-290, vol. 16(3).
International Preliminary Examination Report received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2003/04853, dated Jul. 26, 2004, in 5 pages.
International Preliminary Examination Report received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2003/04401, dated May 18, 2004, in 4 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/033416, dated Mar. 20, 2007, in 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/007313, dated Sep. 23, 2008, in 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/033416, dated Dec. 11, 2006, in 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/007313, dated Mar. 4, 2008, in 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/020382, dated Jul. 31, 2012, in 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/020369, dated Jul. 30, 2012, in 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/020553, dated Aug. 17, 2012, in 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/020383, dated Aug. 17, 2012; in 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/040798, dated Aug. 21, 2013, in 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/040799, dated Aug. 21, 2013, in 19 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/040809, dated Sep. 2, 2013, in 25 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/048332, dated Oct. 16, 2013, in 17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/048343, dated Oct. 11, 2013, in 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/020878, dated May 7, 2014, in 13 pages.
International Search Report received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2003/004401, dated Nov. 10, 2003, in 9 pages.
International Search Report received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2003/004853, dated Jul. 3, 2003, in 3 pages.
International Search Report Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/040847, dated Dec. 14, 2010, in 17 pages.
Kunst et al., “Integrated unit for programmable control of the 21F Hemopump and registration of physiological signals,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, Nov. 1994, pp. 694-696.
Krishnamani et al., “Emerging Ventricular Assist Devices for Long-Term Cardiac Support,” National Review, Cardiology, Feb. 2010, pp. 71-76, vol. 7.
Mihaylov et al., “Development of a New Introduction Technique for the Pulsatile Catheter Pump,” Artificial Organs, 1997, pp. 425-427; vol. 21(5).
Mihaylov et al., “Evaluation of the Optimal Driving Mode During Left Ventricular Assist with Pulsatile Catheter Pump in Calves,” Artificial Organs, 1999, pp. 1117-1122; vol. 23(12).
Morgan, “Medical Shape Memory Alloy Applications-The Market and its Products,” Materials Science and Engineering, 2004, pp. 16-23, vol. A 378.
Morsink et al., “Numerical Modelling of Blood Flow Behaviour in the Valved Catheter of the PUCA-Pump, a LVAD,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1997, pp. 277-284; vol. 20(5).
Nishimura et al, “The Enabler Cannula Pump: A Novel Circulatory Support System,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1999, pp. 317-323; vol. 22(5).
Petrini et al., “Biomedical Applications of Shape Memory Alloys,” Journal of Metallurgy, 2011, pp. 1-15.
Raess et al., “Impella 2.5,” J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res., 2009, pp. 168-172, vol. 2(2).
Rakhorst et al., “In Vitro Evaluation of the Influence of Pulsatile Intraventricular Pumping on Ventricular Pressure Patterns,” Artificial Organs, 1994, pp. 494-499, vol. 18(7).
Reitan et al., “Hemodynamic Effects of a New Percutaneous Circulatory Support Device in a Left Ventricular Failure Model,” ASAIO Journal, 2003, pp. 731-736, vol. 49.
Reitan et al., “Hydrodynamic Properties of a New Percutaneous Intra-Aortic Axial Flow Pump,” ASAIO Journal 2000, pp. 323-328.
Schmitz-Rode et al., “An Expandable Percutaneous Catheter Pump for Left Ventricular Support,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, pp. 1856-1861, vol. 45(11).
Shabari et al., “Improved Hemodynamics with a Novel Miniaturized Intra-Aortic Axial Flow Pump in a Porcine Model of Acute Left Ventricular Dysfunction,” ASAIO Journal, 2013, pp. 240-245; vol. 59.
Sharony et al, “Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology—The Intra-Aortic Cannula Pump: A Novel Assist Device for the Acutely Failing Heart,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nov. 1992, pp. 924-929, vol. 118(5).
Sharony et al., “Right Heart Support During Off-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery—A Multi-Center Study,” The Heart Surgery Forum, 2002, pp. 13-16, vol. 5(1).
Smith et al., “First-In-Man Study of the Reitan Catheter Pump for Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2009, pp. 859-865, vol. 73(7).
Sokolowski et al., “Medical Applications of Shape Memory Polymers,” Biomed. Mater. 2007, pp. S23-S27, vol. 2.
“Statistical Analysis and Clinical Experience with the Recover® Pump Systems”, Impella CardioSystems GmbH, 2 sheets.
Stoeckel et al., “Self-Expanding Nitinol Stents—Material and Design Considerations,” European Radiology, 2003, in 13 sheets.
Stolinski et al., “The heart-pump interaction: effects of a microaxial blood pump,” International Journal of Artificial Organs, 2002, pp. 1082-1088, vol. 25, Issue 11.
Supplemental European Search Report received from the European Patent Office in EP Application No. EP 05799883 dated Mar. 19, 2010, 3 pages.
Takagaki et al., “A Novel Miniature Ventricular Assist Device for Hemodynamic Support,” ASAIO Journal, 2001, pp. 412-416; vol. 47.
Throckmorton et al., “Flexible Impeller Blades in an Axial Flow Pump for Intravascular Cavopulmonary Assistance of the Fontan Physiology,” Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, Dec. 2010, pp. 244-255, vol. 1(4).
Throckmorton et al., “Uniquely shaped cardiovascular stents enhance the pressure generation of intravascular blood pumps,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sep. 2012, pp. 704-709, vol. 133, No. 3.
Verkerke et al., “Numerical Simulation of the PUCA Pump, A Left Ventricular Assist Device,” Abstracts of the XIXth ESAO Congress, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1992, p. 543, vol. 15(9).
Verkerke et al., “Numerical Simulation of the Pulsating Catheter Pump: A Left Ventricular Assist Device,” Artificial Organs, 1999, pp. 924-931, vol. 23(10).
Verkerke et al., “The PUCA Pump: A Left Ventricular Assist Device,” Artificial Organs, 1993, pp. 365-368, vol. 17(5).
Wampler et al., “The Sternotomy Hemopump, A Second Generation Intraarterial Ventricular Assist Device,” ASAIO Journal, 1993, pp. M218-M223, vol. 39.
Weber et al., “Principles of Impella Cardiac Support,” Supplemental to Cardiac Interventions Today, Aug./Sep. 2009.
Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2003/04853, dated Feb. 25, 2004, 5 pages.
Aboul-Hosn et al., “The Hemopump: Clinical Results and Future Applications”, Assisted Circulation 4, 1995, in 14 pages.
Compendium of Technical and Scientific Information for the HEMOPUMP Temporary Cardiac Assist System, Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems, 1988, in 15 pages.
Dekker et al., “Efficacy of a New Intraaortic Propeller Pump vs the Intraaortic Balloon Pump*, An Animal Study”, Chest, Jun. 2003, vol. 123, No. 6, pp. 2089-2095.
Impella CP®—Instructions for Use & Clinical Reference Manual (United States only), Abiomed, Inc., Jul. 2014, 148 pages, www.abiomed.com.
Impella LD® with the Impella® Controller—Circulatory Support System—Instructions for Use & Clinical Reference Manual (United States only), Abiomed, Inc., Sep. 2010, 132 pages, www.abiomed.com.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/020878, dated Sep. 15, 2015, in 8 pages.
International Search Reort and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/026013, dated Jul. 8, 2015, in 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/026014, dated Jul. 15, 2015, in 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/026025, dated Jul. 20, 2015, in 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/025959, dated Aug. 28, 2015, in 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/025960, dated Sep. 3, 2015, in 15 pages.
JOMED Reitan Catheter Pump RCP, Percutaneous Circulatory Support, in 10 pages.
JOMED Reitan Catheter Pump RCP, Feb. 18, 2003, in 4 pages.
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Assist JOMED Catheter PumpTM, in 6 pages.
Reitan, Evaluation of a New Percutaneous Cardiac Assist Device, Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden, 2002, in 172 pages.
Rothman, “The Reitan Catheter Pump: A New Versatile Approach for Hemodynamic Support”, London Chest Hospital Barts & The London NHS Trust, Oct. 22-27, 2006 (TCT 2006: Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 18th Annual Scientific Symposium, Final Program), in 48 pages.
Sieβ et al., “Hydraulic refinement of an intraarterial microaxial blood pump”, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1995, vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 273-285.
Sieβ, “Systemanalyse und Entwicklung intravasaler Rotationspumpen zur Herzunterstützung”, Helmholtz-Institut fur Blomedixinische Technik an der RWTH Aachen, Jun. 24, 1998, in 105 pages.
Siess et al., “Basic design criteria for rotary blood pumps,” H. Masuda, Rotary Blood Pumps, Springer, Japan, 2000, pp. 69-83.
Siess et al., “Concept, realization, and first in vitro testing of an intraarterial microaxial blood pump,” Artificial Organs, 1995, pp. 644-652, vol. 19, No. 7, Blackwell Science, Inc., Boston, International Society for Artificial Organs.
Siess et al., “From a lab type to a product: A retrospective view on Impella's assist technology,” Artificial Organs, 2001, pp. 414-421, vol. 25, No. 5, Blackwell Science, Inc., International Society for Artificial Organs.
Siess et al., “System analysis and development of intravascular rotation pumps for cardiac assist,” Dissertation, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 1999, 39 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/045370, dated Nov. 18, 2015, in 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report received in European Patent Application No. 13813687.4, dated Feb. 24, 2016, in 6 pages.
Extended European Search Report received in European Patent Application No. 13813867.2, dated Feb. 26, 2016, in 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/014371, dated May 2, 2016, in 18 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/014379, dated Jul. 25, 2016, in 19 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/014391, dated May 2, 2016, in 17 pages.
Nullity Action against the owner of the German part DE 50 2007 005 015.6 of European patent EP 2 047 872 B1, dated Jul. 13, 2015, in 61 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150152878 A1 Jun 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60610938 Sep 2004 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 13740042 Jan 2013 US
Child 14622339 US
Parent 13072624 Mar 2011 US
Child 13740042 US
Parent 12157267 Jun 2008 US
Child 13072624 US
Parent 11227277 Sep 2005 US
Child 12157267 US