The present invention relates to fluid pumping impellers, in particular to expandable impellers.
Conventional impellers are manufactured with a particular blade configuration, and significant deformation of the blades is generally undesirable. Conventionally, the impeller has the same configuration during storage, movement to its operating location, and use. However, there are situations where access to the operating location is through a restricted space, or space is otherwise at a premium during storage or transport of the impeller, in which case the use of conventional impellers can be problematic.
An apparatus according to one embodiment of the present invention for inducing motion of a fluid relative to the apparatus includes an impeller. The impeller includes a hub extending in a length direction; and a plurality of blades supported by the hub, each blade having a proximal end attached to the hub and a distal end, the blades being arranged in at least two blade rows arranged in series in the length direction of the hub. The impeller has a deployed configuration and a stored configuration, each blade in the deployed configuration extending away from the hub, and at least one of the blades in the stored configuration being compressed as to move the distal end of the at least one blade towards the hub. Each blade row may include at least two blades. Furthermore, the plurality of blades may be formed integrally with the hub.
The distal end of at least one of the plurality of blades may include a winglet. In some embodiments, the distal end of each blade in at least one blade row may include a winglet. In other embodiments, the distal end of each of the plurality of blades may include a winglet.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention may further include an expandable sleeve. The sleeve may include a matrix and a film disposed around the matrix, at least part of the impeller being located within the sleeve. The matrix may be formed from a shape memory material, and the film may include an elastic polymer. The expandable sleeve may have a storage configuration and an expanded configuration. In the storage configuration, the sleeve may have a diameter less than about 4 mm. The sleeve may have an inlet end and a discharge end, with a plurality of vanes arranged at the discharge end. Each of the plurality of vanes may have an airfoil-shaped cross-section.
An apparatus according to another embodiment of the present invention for inducing motion of a fluid relative to the apparatus includes an impeller. The impeller includes a hub extending in a length direction; and a plurality of blades supported by the hub, each blade having a proximal end attached to the hub and a distal end, the blades being arranged in at least two blade rows arranged in series in the length direction of the hub. The impeller has a deployed configuration, a stored configuration, and an operational configuration. Each blade in the deployed configuration of the impeller extends away from the hub; at least one of the blades in the stored configuration of the impeller is compressed so as to move the distal end of the at least one blade towards the hub; and at least some of the blades in the operational configuration are deformed from the deployed configuration upon rotation of the impeller when in the deployed configuration.
The impeller may have a first radius in the deployed configuration and a second radius in the stored configuration which is less than half the first radius. The impeller may also have a third radius in the operational configuration, the second radius being less than half the third radius. In preferred embodiments, the impeller in the operational configuration may be operable to pump about 4 liters of fluid per minute.
An impeller according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises a hub, and at least one blade supported by the hub. Embodiments of the present invention include impellers having at least one flexible blade, the impeller having a deployed configuration in which the blade extends away from the hub, and a stored configuration in which the impeller is radially compressed. For example, the blade may be folded in towards the hub, and held there by a storage sleeve such as a metal tube or cannula. In the stored configuration, the distal end of the blade is closer to the hub than in the deployed configuration, and the radius can be significantly less, such as less than half that of the radius in the deployed state. The sleeve may comprise a non-expandable portion, in which the impeller is stored, and an expandable portion, into which the impeller can be moved for deployment. The impeller deploys within the expanded portion of the sleeve.
Impellers according to the present invention may comprise a plurality of blades, arranged in blade rows. The blade rows may be spaced apart along the hub, each blade row including one or more blades. For example, each blade row may comprise two or three blades. Achieving the stored configuration is facilitated by providing multiple blade rows, rather than, for example, a single long blade curving around the hub. A single long blade can be considerably more difficult to fold in towards the hub.
Embodiments of the present invention may further include a sleeve, at least part of the impeller being located within the sleeve, and the fluid flowing through the sleeve when the impeller rotates. The sleeve may be expandable, the sleeve having an expanded configuration when the impeller is in the deployed configuration, and a stored configuration when the impeller is in the stored configuration. The sleeve may act to constrain the impeller in the stored configuration. Alternatively, a separate storage sleeve may be provided, with the impeller and expandable sleeve both expanding when pushed out of the storage sleeve. An expandable sleeve may comprise a metal framework, for example comprising a shape memory alloy. An elastic polymer film may be disposed over the metal framework. Impeller blades may have a winglet at the distal end of the blade, the winglet and the sleeve providing a hydraulic bearing for rotation of the impeller. For example, the sleeve may have a cylindrical inner surface inside which the impeller rotates, the fluid flowing through the sleeve, with the winglet of each blade moving proximate to the cylindrical inner surface as the impeller rotates, the fluid between the winglet and cylindrical inner surface forming the hydraulic bearing for rotation of the impeller.
An impeller may be stored in a storage sleeve, and deployed in a fluid pipe, through which fluid flows when the impeller is rotated. The storage sleeve may have a diameter approximately equal to or less than half the diameter of the fluid pipe. The storage sleeve may be a metal tube in which the impeller is stored prior to deployment. The fluid pipe may be a utility pipe (water, gas, sewage, and the like), bodily vessel (such as a blood vessel), portion of a thrust unit for a vehicle, or other structure through which a fluid may flow. The impeller may be conveyed to a desired location in a stored configuration, then self-deploy to an expanded, deployed state. The stored configuration facilitates conveyance of the impeller to the desired location, enabling it to be passed through openings less than the diameter of the deployed state.
The fluid pipe may be an expanded form of the storage sleeve, expansion of the storage sleeve allowing the impeller to deploy. In this case, the impeller does not need to be pushed out of the sleeve to achieve the deployed configuration. For example, an impeller according to an example of the present invention can be inserted in the stored configuration through a small entrance hole into a pipe of larger diameter. The impeller can be deployed by causing the impeller to move out of the storage sleeve using the drive shaft. The impeller then unfolds into the deployed state using stored strain energy in the blade material.
Rotation of the impeller may further change the blade configuration to an operating configuration. An impeller may have flexible blades that deform into an optimized hydrodynamic shape when rotating and operating under design load conditions.
Embodiments of the present invention include impellers having at least one blade having a winglet. In the operating state, the winglet can improve hydrodynamic performance of the impeller and reduce shear stresses that exist within the fluid. Impellers may include a plurality of blades that facilitate the folding of the blades into the storage state. The blades may be arranged in a plurality of rows of blades that facilitate the folding of the blades into the storage state, compared with folding a single blade extending a similar distance along the hub. The blades and (optionally) the hub may be constructed of a low modulus material such as a polymer. The impeller can be a unitary structure, with the blades and impeller formed from the same material, for example by molding a polymer.
An impeller with a plurality of blade rows also facilitates the input of large values of fluid head or pressure rise. The specific speed of an axial flow impeller according to the present invention may be comparable to the specific speed of mixed flow pumps.
An impeller can be inserted into a pipe in a folded state and subsequently deployed. The impeller, when deployed in a fluid flow pipe, may further deform into an operating configuration when the fluid is being pumped by impeller rotation. At the end of the operation of the impeller, the impeller can be radially compressed back into the stored configuration, for example by re-folding the flexible blades, and extracted through an entrance hole having a diameter less than that of the fluid pipe or deployed configuration. For example, the blades can be refolded and the impeller extracted into a cylindrical storage cavity by means of an attached rotary drive shaft or guide wire.
An impeller according to the present invention can operate in a low Reynolds number pipe flow, where the pipe boundary layer comprises a majority of the flow in the pipe. The Reynolds number of the relative flow over the blades can be low, compared to conventional impellers and pumps.
The impeller can be optimized to operate in a non-Newtonian fluid. The impeller can be optimized to operate in a fluid containing delicate particles (such as emulsion droplets, cells, and the like) that are damaged by excessive shearing stress in the fluid. The impeller can be designed so that the operational configuration is optimized, not necessarily the same as the deployed configuration under no loading.
An impeller with an indentation in the hub about the blade root can have reduced internal mechanical stresses within the blades when in the stored configuration. The indentation may also be used to further reduce fluid shear stress induced by the impeller in the operating state.
The blades can be formed from polymer materials, such as polyurethane. A polymer, such as polyurethane, having a modulus of 10,000 psi can be used. In some examples, the blades may have a stiffness approximating that of a thick rubber band. Hence, the blades have some stiffness but will deform under operating load. For example, the material can be chosen so as to have a linear modulus at operational stresses, allowing predictable deformation under load, and a non-linear modulus at the higher stresses used to fold the blades into the stored configuration.
An impeller according to an embodiment of the present invention has flexible blades 15 that can be folded such that the maximum diameter of the impeller in the folded state is approximately half, or less than half, the diameter of the impeller in the operating state. Referring to
An impeller in the stored configuration can be stored in a cylindrical cavity formed by storage sleeve 24 of diameter approximately equal to or less than half the diameter of the fluid pipe 26.
The storage sleeve may be a metal tube in which the impeller is stored prior to deployment. The fluid pipe 26 is any structure through which a fluid may flow relative to the impeller, such as a tube or bodily vessel. The impeller may be conveyed to the desired location within the fluid pipe in the stored configuration, then self-deploy to an expanded, deployed state. The stored configuration allows the impeller to pass through openings having an area less than the area of the deployed state, as swept out by the rotating blades.
Alternatively, the fluid pipe 26 may be an expanded form of the storage sleeve 24, expansion of the constraining sleeve allowing the impeller to deploy. In this case, the impeller does not need to be pushed out of the sleeve to achieve the deployed configuration. For example, an impeller can be inserted into a fluid pipe through a smaller hole, such as a smaller branch pipe or hole in the pipe wall. The impeller can then be deployed by causing the impeller to move out of the storage sleeve using the drive shaft. Deployment may occur without any outside energy input, using stored strain energy in the blades when the blades are in the stored configuration.
Blade shapes can be optimized using standard computational fluid dynamics analysis (CFD). However, conventionally, the non-rotating, non-loaded configuration is optimized. (If the impeller is not expandable, the deployed shape is the shape of the impeller when not rotating, and there is no stored configuration). An improved impeller has an optimized operational configuration, and an improved method of designing an impeller includes optimizing the operational configuration. A structural computation determines an allowance for deformation under load from the deployed state.
This illustration shows the design elements of a low Reynolds number impeller, where the thickness of the boundary layer on the fluid pipe walls is as thick as the diameter of the pipe. The impeller has highly curved leading and trailing edge lines where the blade pitch angles are adjusted for the local values of relative flow angle. The second row blades have a groove-like feature that takes a helical path from the leading edge to the trailing edge. This is due to variations in the spanwise loading, and allows an axial flow pump using this impeller to achieve a head rise similar to that of a mixed flow pump. The middle of the span of the blade is relatively highly loaded, leading to this feature. The second row blades may be further split into two separated blade rows, and this general feature will still present but not so apparent.
For a mixed flow impeller of similar performance, the hub diameter is typically much larger, so that folding into a stored diameter half the deployed diameter is impossible.
Impellers may have at least one blade having a winglet. In some embodiments, all blades within a blade row include a winglet; other blades may or may not have a winglet. A winglet can improve hydrodynamic performance of the impeller. A winglet may also reduce shear stresses that exist within the fluid, for example reducing degradation of biological structures such as cells that may exist within the fluid.
The winglets are preferably aerodynamically smooth shapes. The winglets have leading edges where flows impact the edges of the winglets, and trailing edges where flow is discharged from the winglet surfaces. Winglets preferably have smooth aerodynamic cross-sections, generally in the direction of the mean flow, which is parallel to the flow direction along the blade tip surfaces.
An indentation close to the blade root, such as a trench around some or all of the blade root, can help reduce internal mechanical stresses in the blades when the blades are in the stored configuration, for example folded against the hub. The indentation may also be used to reduce fluid shear stress in the operating state.
Preferably, a non-linear property material is used for the blades. The blade material can be relatively stiff at operating loads, and the same material relatively flexible at higher strains, for example when the blades are folded in the stored condition. For example, the strain might be 10 percent at operating loads and 75 percent while folded, and the stress/strain curve has high modulus (e.g. 10000) at operating loads, and low modulus (e.g. 1000) at higher loads associated with folding. The stress-strain curve may have two approximately linear regions with a break point between the operating point and the folded point strains.
The curve is double normalized, the design point value being 1.0, the scale being read as a factor times the value of stress at the design point. For example,
Impellers according to embodiments of the present invention may be compressed and packaged into a storage sleeve, such as a metal tube, catheter, or other structure, for insertion into an object. For an object such as a living subject, the diameter of the storage sleeve can be approximately three to four millimeters, or less. Having inserted the device, the impeller can be deployed in situ into a geometry that may be approximately six to seven millimeters in diameter. The impeller then can be rotated using a flexible drive shaft coupled to a drive motor external to the subject. Impellers according to the present invention can be inserted in the stored state, then deployed into an expanded configuration (relative to the stored state) and are capable of pumping 4 liters per minute, for example, as a medical assist device. In a representative example of such a device, the impeller rotates at approximately 30,000 RPM. The impeller may comprise two or more airfoil shaped blades that form an axial flow pump. The impeller may be positioned using a guide wire and rotated using a flexible shaft. The guide wire may run within a hollow center of the flexible shaft, and the hollow center may also convey saline solution or other fluid for infusion, cooling, and/or lubrication purposes. The guide wire may be removed, if desired. Implantation into a living subject can be achieved through a cannula having a diameter of 3-4 mm, without surgical intervention. For medical implantation, a drive shaft comprising a metal braid, or a polymer or composite material braid, can be used, and the drive shaft diameter may be of the order 1½ to 2 millimeters, and may be hollow to allow a guide wire to pass through.
In further embodiments, the sleeve has expandable and non-expandable portions. The impeller is stored within the non-expandable portion for insertion. When the impeller is located at or near the desired location, the impeller is then urged out of the non-expandable portion of the sleeve into the expandable portion. The stored elastic energy within the flexible blades of the impeller induces self-deployment of the impeller, and also the expansion of the expandable portion of the sleeve. The expanded sleeve then may have the role of a fluid flow pipe, through which fluid flows when the impeller is rotated. The expandable sleeve may comprise a metal or polymer mesh, or woven fibers, and a smooth sheathing to provide a flexible, expandable tube.
An expandable sleeve may comprise a mesh formed from a flexible material, such as polymers, metals, or other material. In one example, the mesh is made from nitinol, a memory metal alloy. A thin sheet or cylinder of the metal, of a thickness on the order of a thousandth of an inch, is cut using a laser so as to leave a mesh structure. Alternatively, the mesh can be formed from a polymer. Other suitable materials for the mesh include other metals (such as alloys, including memory metal alloy), polymers, and the like. A coating, such an elastic coating, is then provided over the mesh. For example, an elastic polymer such as Estane™ can be used, or other polyurethane.
Hence, the expandable sleeve may comprise a mesh, such as a matrix of woven wires, or a machined metal cylinder with laser cut voids representing the spaces between wires, or another material that when deformed in one direction would elongate in the perpendicular direction. The mesh can then be covered with a thin film of elastane to form a fluid flow pipe through which the fluid flows. The mesh can be formed as a cylinder with flow entrance voids at the distal end and flow discharge voids at the proximal end, the proximal end being closer to the point of insertion into an object, such as a pipe or living subject. As the sleeve is shortened in length, for example using a guide wire, the cylinder expands to a greater diameter, allowing a greater flow rate. A hexagonal cell matrix design, or other design, can be used for the mesh. A coating (for example, biocompatible, corrosion resistant, or flow improving) can be applied to the sleeve, for example by solution casting.
The orientation of the mesh or woven fibers of the sleeve can be chosen to allow two stable configurations, stored and deployed. In one example, designed for subject implantation in the stored position, the expandable sleeve in the deployed configuration was approximately 20-30 cm long and the diameter was approximately 6-7 mm. This diameter allowed for higher fluid flow rate and reduced friction pressure losses. In the stored configuration, the expandable portion was elongated by approximately 30 percent relative to the deployed configuration, and the diameter was approximately 3 mm. The final portion (distal end) of the assembly comprises a second set of openings and plates, providing an inlet or opening for the influx of fluid to be pumped. The sleeve may also provide a guide wire attachment opening for fluid discharge. A short (such as 1 cm) section of the sleeve may contain linear elements (vanes) arranged about the central axis of the sleeve, through which fluid is discharged. The vanes may act as stationary stator blades and remove swirl velocity from the impeller discharge flow. The vanes may be manufactured with airfoil type cross-sections. Applications of an impeller deploying within an expandable sleeve include a collapsible fire hose with an integral booster pump, a collapsible propulsor, a biomedical pump for a biological fluid, and the like.
The impeller blade can be designed so as to minimize destruction of delicate particles (such as emulsion droplets, suspensions, biological structures such as cells, and the like) within a fluid. A CFD model was used to simulate the shear stresses experienced by particles passing through a simulated impeller. Time integrations of intermediate shear stresses experienced by the particles were used to provide an estimated probability of cell destruction in a biomedical application. A split blade design, in which there are a plurality of blade rows such as discussed above, reduces the residency time that cells remain in intermediate shear stress regions, allowing an advantageous reduction in cell or other particle destruction compared with conventional impeller designs.
Impeller blades may, for example, occupy as much as 95% of the compressed volume of the impeller when the impeller is in the stored state. The blades may be formed from a rubbery, elastic, or other resilient material that has sufficient resilience to expand when ejected from a sleeve. In other examples, the blades may be formed from other flexible polymers, an expandable foam optionally with a skin, or other compressible or deformable materials including metals.
Impellers according to embodiments of the present invention may have multiple separate sets of blades, rather than a long, continuous, spiral blade. Prior art impellers typically have a continuous long helical blade that is difficult to fold up against the hub. By splitting a long blade into two or three shorter sections, the blade can be more easily folded into a cylindrical volume or space and subsequently deployed when properly located. The number of blade rows can be one, two, three, four, five, or higher. The twist pitch angles may be variable.
One approach to impeller design provides a two blade impeller with blades exhibiting a significant degree of wrap around the central hub. However, the three-dimensional shape of the blades limits the degree to which they can be folded without deforming or breaking. By breaking a single blade row into two, three (or possibly more) rows of blades that exhibit minimum wrap around the hub, the blades have a more two-dimensional shape, allowing easier bending during the storage process. The combination of three or two blade rows can produce the same flow and pressure as a single blade row. An axial pump was designed with two blade rows, and CFD (computational fluid dynamics) analysis indicated that this pump design was adequate for use in a medical assist application. A model was constructed of a flexible polyurethane material and successfully folded into a metal sleeve.
Impellers can be used with flows of very small Reynolds number, for example, the pumping of relatively viscous fluids at low velocity or flow rate. Very small impeller pumps, on the order of 6 mm diameter, may be fabricated from a polymer and extracted from a precision mold. This allows production of impellers at very low cost. The use of polymer blades allows the pump impellers to be extracted from molds without becoming mold-locked, and allows the use of one-piece molds, instead of multi-part or split molds. This can be advantageous for pumping small quantities of bio-fluids. Impellers may be used for flows of typical Reynolds numbers as well. Impeller diameters can also be in the range of several inches to several feet.
Applications of the improved impeller designs described include pumps for chemical engineering, propellers for airborne or maritime vessels, water pumps, and the like. Improved impeller designs are useful for any application where an impeller is to be stored in a compact configuration. Impellers may be formed from metal sheets, plastic, and non-resilient materials, for example, in foldable configurations. Deployment may include the use of motors or other mechanical devices to unfold blades, automatic deployment induced by centrifugal forces, and the like. Examples of the present invention include a device locatable inside a subject so as to pump a fluid, the device being inserted into the subject in an insertion configuration having an insertion cross-section, the device operating inside the subject in an operating configuration having an operating cross-section, wherein the operating cross-section is greater than the insertion cross-section.
The operating diameter (of the largest circle swept out by the outer edge of the impeller blade as it rotates) may be over 50% greater than the insertion diameter of the impeller, and may be over 100% greater than the insertion diameter.
The invention is not restricted to the illustrative examples described above. Examples are not intended as limitations on the scope of the invention. Methods, apparatus, compositions, and the like described herein are exemplary and not intended as limitations on the scope of the invention. Changes therein and other uses will occur to those skilled in the art. The scope of the invention is defined by the scope of the claims.
Patents, patent applications, or publications mentioned in this specification are incorporated herein by reference to the same extent as if each individual document was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/227,277, filed Sept. 15, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,393,181, which claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/610,938, filed Sept. 17, 2004, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1902418 | Pilgrim | Mar 1933 | A |
2356659 | Aguiar | Oct 1942 | A |
2649052 | Weyer | Aug 1953 | A |
2664050 | Abresch | Dec 1953 | A |
2684035 | Kemp | Jul 1954 | A |
2789511 | Warren | Apr 1957 | A |
2935068 | Donaldson | May 1960 | A |
3080824 | Boyd et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3510229 | Smith | May 1970 | A |
3812812 | Hurwitz | May 1974 | A |
3860968 | Shapiro | Jan 1975 | A |
4135253 | Reich et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4149535 | Volder | Apr 1979 | A |
4304524 | Coxon et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4458366 | MacGregor | Jul 1984 | A |
4540402 | Aigner | Sep 1985 | A |
4589822 | Clausen et al. | May 1986 | A |
4625712 | Wampler | Dec 1986 | A |
4686982 | Nash | Aug 1987 | A |
4704121 | Moise | Nov 1987 | A |
4753221 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4769006 | Papantonakos | Sep 1988 | A |
4817586 | Wampler | Apr 1989 | A |
4846152 | Wampler et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4895557 | Moise et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4900227 | Trouplin et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4902272 | Milder et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4908012 | Moise et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919647 | Nash | Apr 1990 | A |
4944722 | Carriker et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4957504 | Chardack | Sep 1990 | A |
4964864 | Summers et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969865 | Hwang et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4985014 | Orejola | Jan 1991 | A |
4994017 | Yozu | Feb 1991 | A |
5021048 | Buckholtz | Jun 1991 | A |
5049134 | Golding et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5089016 | Millner et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092844 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098256 | Smith | Mar 1992 | A |
5112200 | Isaacson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5112349 | Summers et al. | May 1992 | A |
5129883 | Black | Jul 1992 | A |
5147186 | Buckholtz | Sep 1992 | A |
5171212 | Buck et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5201679 | Velte, Jr. et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5211546 | Isaacson et al. | May 1993 | A |
5290227 | Pasque | Mar 1994 | A |
5300112 | Barr | Apr 1994 | A |
5346458 | Affeld | Sep 1994 | A |
5360317 | Clausen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5376114 | Jarvik | Dec 1994 | A |
5405383 | Barr | Apr 1995 | A |
5437541 | Vainrub et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458459 | Hubbard et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5505701 | Anaya Fernandez de Lomana | Apr 1996 | A |
5527159 | Bozeman, Jr. et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533957 | Aldea | Jul 1996 | A |
5588812 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5613935 | Jarvik | Mar 1997 | A |
5643226 | Cosgrove et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5678306 | Bozeman, Jr. et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5707218 | Maher et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5722930 | Larson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746709 | Rom et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749855 | Reitan | May 1998 | A |
5755784 | Jarvik | May 1998 | A |
5814011 | Corace | Sep 1998 | A |
5824070 | Jarvik | Oct 1998 | A |
5851174 | Jarvik et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5868703 | Bertolero | Feb 1999 | A |
5888242 | Antaki et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5911685 | Siess et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921913 | Siess | Jul 1999 | A |
5941813 | Sievers et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951263 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964694 | Siess et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6007479 | Rottenberg et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6058593 | Siess | May 2000 | A |
6086527 | Talpade | Jul 2000 | A |
6123659 | le Blanc et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132363 | Freed et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135943 | Yu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139487 | Siess | Oct 2000 | A |
6176822 | Nix et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176848 | Rau et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190304 | Downey et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200260 | Bolling | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227797 | Watterson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245007 | Bedingham et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247892 | Kazatchkov et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254359 | Aber | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295877 | Aboul-Hosn et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6387037 | Bolling et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6422990 | Prem | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425007 | Messinger | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428464 | Bolling | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447441 | Yu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6508777 | Macoviak et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508787 | Erbel et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517315 | Belady | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6532964 | Aboul-Hosn et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533716 | Schmitz-Rode et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544216 | Sammler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547519 | deBlanc et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6609883 | Woodard et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610004 | Viole et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6623420 | Reich et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6692318 | McBride | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6716189 | Jarvik et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6749598 | Keren et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6776578 | Belady | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783328 | Lucke et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790171 | Grundeman et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6794789 | Siess et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817836 | Nose et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6860713 | Hoover | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866625 | Avre et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6942611 | Siess | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949066 | Bearnson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6966748 | Woodard et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974436 | Aboul-Hosn et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981942 | Khaw et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984392 | Bechert et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010954 | Siess et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011620 | Siess | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7022100 | Aboul-Hosn et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7027875 | Siess et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7070555 | Siess | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7150711 | Nusser et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160243 | Medvedev | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175588 | Morello | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7284956 | Nose et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7331921 | Viole et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7393181 | McBride | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7491163 | Viole et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7731675 | Aboul-Hosn et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020169413 | Keren et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030135086 | Khaw et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030208097 | Aboul-Hosn et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231959 | Snider | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040101406 | Hoover | May 2004 | A1 |
20050095124 | Arnold et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050165269 | Aboul-Hosn et al. | Jul 2005 | A9 |
20060018943 | Bechert et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058869 | Olson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070203442 | Bechert et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080103591 | Siess | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114339 | McBride et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080306327 | Shifflette | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 364 293 | Apr 1990 | EP |
2267800 | Apr 1974 | FR |
H08-196624 | Aug 1996 | JP |
WO-9405347 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9715228 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9937352 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-9944651 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9959652 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0012148 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0124867 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 03048582 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03103745 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2006051023 | May 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090060743 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60610938 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11227277 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 12157267 | US |