Intervertebral implants are commonly used in spinal surgery, such as in interbody fusion procedures, in which an implant (e.g., a spacer or cage) is placed in the disc space between two vertebrae to be fused together. At least a portion of the disc is typically removed before the implant is positioned in the intervertebral space, and the implant may be supplemented with bone graft material to promote fusion of the vertebrae. Interbody fusion procedures may also be performed in conjunction with other types of fixation, such as pedicle screw fixation, to provide additional stability, particularly while the vertebrae fuse together.
Different interbody fusion procedures can be distinguished by their location along the spine (e.g., in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar regions); by the type of implant used; and by the surgical approach to the intervertebral space, in which different surgical approaches often imply different structural characteristics of the implant or implants used. Different surgical approaches to the spine include anterior, posterior, and lateral. Examples of interbody fusion techniques performed along a posterior approach include posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). PLIF techniques typically include positioning two intervertebral implants into the intervertebral space along a posterior to anterior direction, with one implant being positioned towards the left side of the spine and one implant being positioned towards the right side of the spine. The implants used in such PLIF techniques typically have a straight shape, in that they extend along a central axis. TLIF techniques, by contrast, typically include positioning one intervertebral implant into the intervertebral space (often towards the anterior portion of the intervertebral space) from the posterior of the patient, but the spine is approached on one side from a more lateral position than in PLIF techniques. The implants used in such TLIF techniques are often curved, such that they have an overall kidney bean-like shape.
Included among the different types of intervertebral implants are expandable implants. Such implants often have an initially contracted configuration, such that they have a low profile in the superior-inferior direction, in order to ease insertion into the intervertebral space. Such expandable implants can then be expanded in the superior-inferior direction after implantation, so as to securely engage and stabilize the vertebrae on both sides of the intervertebral space. Examples of such expandable intervertebral implants are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,992,620 (“the '620 Patent”), which is hereby incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein. Expandable intervertebral implants having certain similar features to those in the '620 Patent are disclosed herein, and therefore some similar nomenclature is used herein for clarity and consistency.
Although considerable effort has been devoted in the art to optimization of such intervertebral systems and methods, still further improvement would be desirable.
The present invention relates to expandable interbody implants, as well as methods of operating the same. Expandable interbody implants in accordance with aspects of the invention include opposing first and second surfaces for engaging respective vertebral bodies on each side of an intervertebral space. When the implants are expanded from a contracted configuration to an expanded configuration, the first and second surfaces are moved apart from one another. A locking system may be provided for restraining contraction of the implant. The locking system may have a locked configuration, in which the first and second surfaces are prevented from moving back towards the contracted configuration, and the locking system may have an unlocked configuration, in which the first and second surfaces are permitted to move back towards the contracted configuration. The locking system may be controlled by rotation of one or more pinions. The pinions may, in turn, be controlled by linear movement of a rack. The rack may be configured so as to bias the locking system towards the locked configuration. Other aspects of the invention may include a stop for constraining the maximum expansion of the implant.
A spinal implant for placement between first and second vertebral bodies, in accordance with an aspect of the invention, includes first and second members having respective first and second surfaces for engaging the respective vertebral bodies. The first and second surfaces may be on opposing sides of the implant to engage the respective vertebral bodies on each side of an intervertebral space. The implant may include at least one extendable support element and a locking system. The extendable support element may have a contracted configuration and at least one extended configuration. The contracted configuration may facilitate deployment of the implant between the first and second vertebral bodies. In the extended configuration, the first and second members may extend away from one another so that the first and second surfaces are positioned further apart from one another than in the contracted configuration. The locking system may comprise at least one locking element movable between a locked configuration and an unlocked configuration. The locking element may prevent movement of the extendable support element towards the contracted configuration when the locking element is in the locked configuration, and the locking element may permit movement of the extendable support element towards the contracted configuration when the locking element is in the unlocked configuration. The locking element may also include a pinion, such that movement of the locking element between the locked and unlocked configuration is actuated by rotation of the pinion.
In accordance with other aspects of the invention, the spinal implant may include a linear rack for rotating the pinion. In accordance with some such aspects of the invention, the linear rack may move linearly within a channel that supplies a fluid for extending the extendable support element. In accordance with other such aspects of the invention, the linear rack may be biased so as to move the locking element towards the locked configuration. For example, the linear rack may be biased by a linear spring.
In accordance with other aspects of the invention, the locking system may further include a second locking element having a second pinion. In accordance with such aspects of the invention, the second locking element may be movable between a locked configuration and an unlocked configuration by rotation of the second pinion. The second locking element may prevent movement of a second one of the extendable support elements towards the contracted configuration when the second locking element is in the locked configuration, and the second locking element may permit movement of the second extendable support element towards the contracted configuration when the second locking element is in the unlocked configuration. A linear rack may be engaged with the pinion and the second pinion for simultaneously rotating the pinion and the second pinion.
In accordance with yet other aspects of the invention, the extendable support element may be configured to be extended by a fluid.
In accordance with other aspects of the invention, the extendable support element may include a piston slidably received within a cylinder. In accordance with some such aspects of the invention, the locking element may be received within the cylinder.
In accordance with other aspects of the invention, the locking system may include a plurality of inter-engaging locking elements, including an upper lock support member and a lower lock support member, and the locking element may be one of the upper and lower lock support members. In accordance with such aspects of the invention, the upper lock support member may have a multi-stepped support surface, and the lower lock support system may have a multi-stepped support surface configured to move into engagement with the multi-stepped support surface of the upper lock support member in the locked configuration. In accordance with some such aspects of the invention, the locking element may be the lower lock support member, which may be rotatable relative to the upper lock support member between the locked and unlocked configurations in response to rotation of the pinion. In accordance with other such aspects of the invention, the lower lock support member may be rotatable relative to the upper lock support member about an axle rigidly connected to one of the first and second members. In accordance with yet other such aspects of the invention, the extendable support element may include a piston slidably received within a cylinder. In accordance with such aspects of the invention, the upper lock support member may be disposed within the piston and the lower lock support member may be rotatably received within the cylinder.
In accordance with other aspects of the invention, one of the first and second members may define a slot extending along an extension direction, and the other of the first and second members may include a projection received within the slot. In accordance with such aspects of the invention, the projection may prevent further extension of the first and second members away from one another when the projection abuts an end of the slot. In accordance with some such aspects of the invention, the extendable support element may comprise a first extendable support element and a second extendable support element, such that the projection and the slot are positioned between the first and second extendable support elements.
In accordance with other aspects of the invention, the implant may have a curved, kidney bean-like shape.
In accordance with yet other aspects of the invention, the implant may have a straight shape along its central longitudinal axis.
A spinal implant for placement between first and second vertebral bodies, in accordance with another aspect of the invention, includes first and second members having respective first and second surfaces for engaging the respective vertebral bodies. The first and second surfaces may be on opposing sides of the implant to engage the respective vertebral bodies on each side of an intervertebral space. The implant may include at least one extendable support element and a locking system. The extendable support element may have a contracted configuration and at least one extended configuration. The contracted configuration may facilitate deployment of the implant between the first and second vertebral bodies. In the extended configuration, the first and second members may extend away from one another along an extension direction so that the first and second surfaces are positioned further apart from one another than in the contracted configuration. One of the first and second members may further define a slot extending along the extension direction, and the other of the first and second members may include a projection received within the slot. The projection desirably prevents further extension of the first and second members away from one another when the projection abuts an end of the slot.
In accordance with another aspect of the above invention, the slot may be defined within the first member and the projection may be provided on the second member. In accordance with such aspect of the invention, the projection may include a pin removably secured within an opening of the second member.
The implant 10 includes a pair of extendable support elements in the form of pistons 22 attached to the underside of the top end plate 13, which pistons 22 are slidably received within a corresponding pair of cylinders 16 defined within the housing 11. The sliding of the pistons 22 along the cylinders 16 results in the translation of the top end plate 13 so as to expand the implant 10, as discussed above. The pistons 22 and cylinders 16 may operate as part of a hydraulic system, in which the sliding of the pistons 22 away from the bottoms of the cylinders is driven by pressurized fluid within the cylinders 16, as discussed below and in the '620 Patent. Seal members 23, which may be in the form of o-rings, are positioned so as to seal the sliding interface between the cylinders 16 and the respective pistons 22, in order to prevent the pressurized fluid from escaping through that interface. The seal members 23 may be seated within corresponding grooves 45 defined in the outer surfaces of the cylinders 16. In an alternative (not shown), the seal members 23 may be mounted on the pistons 22 so that the seal members 23 slide with the pistons 22 within the cylinders 16, as disclosed in certain embodiments of the '620 Patent.
The implant 10 also includes a locking system to lock the position of the top end plate 13 by preventing the top end plate 13 from translating back towards the housing 11. That locking system may include multiple inter-engaging locking elements. For example, the implant 10 may include a pair of lower lock supports 20 positioned within the housing 11 and a corresponding pair of upper lock supports 17 (see
The tiered, multiple steps of the upper and lower lock supports allow the implant 10 to be locked at several different expanded heights. The underside of the stepped support surfaces 18 of the upper lock support 17 may be provided with increasing riser height (alignment faces 46) in the upward direction to provide smaller incremental expansion near the end of the piston expansion. In addition or alternatively, the stepped support surfaces 21 of the lower lock support 20 may be provided with decreasing riser height in the upward direction for the same reason. A variety of riser heights of the upper lock support 17 or lower lock support 20 can be provided. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, the riser heights may vary in multiples of 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm. The lowermost stepped support surfaces 18 of the upper lock support 17 and the uppermost stepped support surfaces 21 of the lower lock support 20 may also be provided with various lengths and widths. For example, at higher levels of expansion, fewer support surfaces 18, 21 of the respective upper and lower lock supports 17, 20 will be in engagement, and therefore those support surfaces can have increased widths in order to provide sufficient supporting material.
Each lower lock support 20 includes an axial receptacle 54 for receiving and rotating around a respective axle 56 mounted within one of the cylinders 16, which axles 56 may be attached to a bottom portion of the housing 11 (e.g., by being integrally formed with the housing). Bushings 58 may be received within respective grooves 60 towards the top ends of the axles 56, in order to constrain the axial positions of the lower lock supports 20 with respect to the axles 56. The lower lock supports 20 also each include a pinion 62 having teeth 64, such that rotation of the lower lock supports 20 about the axles 56 may be controlled via the application of rotational force to the pinion 62.
As shown in the plan, cross-sectional views of the implant 10 illustrated in
The housing 11 of the implant 10 comprises an outer wall 31 having a distal end defining a leading nose 32 and a proximal end defining an engagement region 33. The leading nose 32 has inwardly directed side tapered faces 34 and a top tapered face 35 and bottom tapered face 36. These tapered faces 34, 35, and 36 enable non-traumatic insertion of the implant 10 past neural elements and between vertebral bodies. The distal end may also include structures that aid in manipulating the implant in situ (e.g., steering elements that facilitate at least partial rotation of the implant). The engagement region 33 includes a delivery tool anchor 37, which allows secure attachment of the implant 10 to a delivery tool (not shown), such as one illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,070,813; 8,998,924; 9,028,550; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/319,460 filed on Apr. 7, 2016 (hereinafter “the '460 Provisional”); or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/480,781 filed on Apr. 6, 2017, the disclosures of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein. The engagement region 33 also contains one or more pressure input ports 38, which are used to deliver a pressurized fluid to the interiors of cylinders 16 in order to expand the implant 10. For example, as disclosed in the '460 Provisional, the pressure input port(s) 38 may receive a tube set in sealing engagement, or may sealingly engage a sealing aperture around the edge of the pressure input port 38, so that the pressurized fluid (e.g., saline) may be provided thereby into the pressure input port 38. The engagement region 33 may also include one or more engagement features, such as a recess 82, which may be engageable by the delivery tool in order to act as an anti-rotation feature for securing the rotational orientation of the implant 10 with respect to the delivery tool anchor 37, as also disclosed in the '460 Provisional. The outer wall 31 of the housing 11 also provides one or more side openings 40, which provide space for bony ingrowth into the central cavity 15 in the housing 11 and may also provide radiolucent openings for the radiographic imaging of the process of bony ingrowth.
As shown in
Implant 10 is configured to be implanted between opposing vertebral bodies in the spine to facilitate bony fusion between those vertebral bodies. The implant 10 is shown in its collapsed or contracted configuration in
As shown in
In operation, upon the extension of the top end plate 13 and the attached upper lock supports 17, the lower lock supports 20 rotate about the cylinders 16 due to the force applied by the rack 68 from the linear spring 72. Thus, the alignment faces 47 of the lower lock supports 20 are forced against the alignment faces 46 of the upper lock support 17. When the cylinders 16 are pressurized, the pistons 22 raise the top end plate 13 and attached upper lock supports 17, thus lifting the support surfaces 18 of the upper lock support 17 off of the support surfaces 21 of the lower lock support 20, and also moving the lower alignment faces 46 past the upper alignment faces 47. When the alignment faces 46 of the upper lock support 17 have cleared the alignment faces 47 of the lower lock support 20, the locking actuator (i.e., linear spring 72), which is engaging the rack 68 meshed with the teeth 64 of the pinions 62 of each lower lock support 20, forces the lower lock supports 20 to rotate. The support surfaces 21 of the rotating lower lock supports 20 then move to the next lower level of the support surfaces 18 of the raised upper lock supports 17 until the alignment faces 47 of the lower lock supports 20 engage the next level of the alignment faces 46 of the upper lock supports 17. The lower lock support 20 and upper lock support 17 thus lock the top end plate 13 at this expanded level. This process repeats itself at each locking level.
The above-described operation of the locking components is illustrated in
The implant 10 may also be unlocked, to allow the top end plate 13 to move back towards the housing 11. Specifically, the rack 68 can be depressed by pushing it towards the distal end of the housing 11, for example with a component (e.g., a relatively rigid wire) inserted into the open end of the channel 66 (i.e., into the pressure input port 38, in the illustrated embodiment), which will cause the lower lock supports 20 to rotate out of engagement with the upper lock supports 17 and allow the implant 10 to collapse.
Some benefits believed to be provided by the rack-and-pinion design of the locking components disclosed herein include the tangential arrangement of the rack 68 with respect to the pinions 62 (whereby the force applied to the pinions 62 is always at a constant distance from the center of rotation of the pinions 62), which results in a consistent amount of moment being applied to both lower lock supports 20, regardless of the rotational orientation of the lower lock supports. The use of a single linear spring 72 to bias the single rack 68, which drives the pinions 62 of both lower lock supports 20, also allows for the moment load to be applied equally to both lower lock supports. The design of the locking components disclosed herein also allows for both lower lock supports 20 to have identical structures, which simplifies manufacturability and assembly of those components. Indeed, overall benefits of the present design are believed to include a minimal use of different subcomponents, which results in ease of manufacturing and assembly, as well as improved ease of use and reliability (particularly with regard to unlocking the implant so as to allow it to collapse from its extended configuration).
Another embodiment of an intervertebral implant 110 in accordance with the present invention is illustrated in
The distally extending projection 186 from the top end plate 113, which is received within a space 190 defined within the housing 111, has a different geometry and location in the embodiment of
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The outer configuration of the implants 10 and 110 illustrated in
One of the principal differences between the embodiment of the implant 210 in
As shown in
As shown in the embodiments of
Some or all of the components or portions of components of the implants 10, 110, 210 disclosed herein may be created by an additive manufacturing or 3D printing process, e.g., using Laser Rapid Manufacturing (LRM) technology. Additionally, or alternatively, some of the components or portions of components may be manufactured from a porous material, such as a porous metal. Such porous metal may be in the form of a porous, commercially-pure titanium matrix or a porous, titanium alloy (e.g., a Ti6Al4V alloy), such as those manufactured by Howmedica Osteonics Corp. under the trademark TRITANIUM®. Examples of additive manufacturing processes for creating some or all of the components of the implants 10, 110, 210 disclosed herein, including some such processes for creating porous materials, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,537,664; 8,147,861; 8,350,186; 8,728,387; 8,992,703; 9,135,374; and 9,180,010, as well as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0147332, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein. In one example, the top end plate 13, 113, 213 and the bottom 12, 112, 212 of the housing 11, 111, 211 may include a porous titanium matrix formed via 3D printing, and then various features of the implant 10, 110, 210 may be further defined by machining of those components. For example, the surface features (e.g., pyramidal shaped protrusions 196 and linear ridges 298) may be defined in the porous matrix by machining the bottom end surface 8, 108, 208 and the top end surface 9, 109, 209. The porous material may also be supplemented by or replaced with solid or denser material in at least portions of the implant 10, 110, 210, however. For example, the tops of the pyramidal shaped protrusions 196 and/or linear ridges 298 may be formed from solid material, while the surrounding base portions that interconnect those features are formed from a porous matrix. Solid (non-porous) material may also be used in the portions of the implant 10, 110, 210 that enclose the hydraulic fluid. Solid material, which may be constructed with a smooth surface finish, may also be used along the interfaces between components that slide with respect to one another. Solid material may also be used in portions of the implant 10, 110, 210 where additional structural integrity is needed due to the loads that will be applied by the spine. For example, the periphery of the top end plate 13, 113, 213 may be constructed of solid material. In another example, the struts 44, 144, 244 and/or portions of the central portion 109C, 209C (e.g., one or more linear segments extending across the central portion along the longitudinal direction of the implant, so as to connect the struts) may be constructed of solid material, in order to increase the strength to the top end plate 13, 113, 213 and transfer the load applied by the projection 86, 186, 286 to the rest of the top end plate 13, 113, 213. In an alternative, portions of the implant 10, 110, 210 where additional structural integrity is needed may be constructed of a porous metal material, but the density of that material may be increased in those portions. Examples of implants having both solid and porous portions, as well as methods of creating the same, are disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/245,004, filed on Oct. 22, 2015, and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0199193, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein.
Although not illustrated in the embodiments of the invention discussed above, an implant 10, 110, 210 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may include one or more bone graft infusion conduits within it for directing bone graft material therethrough, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,028,550 (“the '550 Patent”), the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein. For example, the bone graft infusion conduit may communicate with one or more bone graft exit ports for dispersing bone graft material into and around the implant. In one example, as disclosed in the '550 Patent, at least one such bone graft exit port may communicate with the interior cavity 15, 115, 215, so as to fill the interior cavity of the implant 10, 110, 210 with bone graft material. The bone graft material may be supplied to the bone graft infusion conduit through a bone graft input port, which may be located at the engagement region 33, 133, 233 of the implant, so that the bone graft material may be supplied into the bone graft infusion conduit from the implant delivery tool.
Alternatively, or additionally, an implant 10, 110, 210 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may include one or more manifolds, channels, or passages to permit flowable material to flow into or through the implant, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0199190, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein. For example, in an embodiment of the implant 10, 110, 210 having porous portions, as discussed above, one or more channels within the implant may communicate with one or more of such porous portions so as to supply the flowable material into and/or through those porous portions, as disclosed in the '697 Application. The flowable material may be supplied to the internal channels of the implant via an input port, which may be located at the engagement region 33, 133, 233 of the implant, so that the flowable material may be supplied by the implant delivery tool. One example of a flowable material for distribution via such internal channels is a flowable bone marrow aspirate.
Although the embodiments of the implant 10, 110, 210 disclosed above included pistons 22, 122, 222 and cylinders 16, 116, 216 driven by hydraulic pressure to expand the implant 10, 110, 210, other forms of extendable support elements may alternatively be used. For example, as disclosed in the '620 Patent, the implant 10, 110, 210 may be expanded by bellows, rotating cam lift mechanisms, rotating screw lift mechanisms, or other such devices. Moreover, the extendable support elements may be separately controllable (e.g., with separate hydraulic pressure channels), so that the extendable support elements can be extended to different vertical positions. In such embodiments, the top end plate 13, 113, 213 may instead take the form of separate plates associated with each extendable support element, or the top end plate 13, 113, 213 may be arranged to pivot with respect to the extendable support elements to accommodate their different vertical positions, as disclosed in the '620 Patent. In other alternative embodiments in accordance with the present invention, rather than being positioned within the pistons and cylinders, the upper and lower lock supports can be positioned around the pistons and cylinders, as in certain embodiments disclosed in the '620 Patent.
Although the embodiments disclosed herein illustrate implants 10, 110, 210 in which a pair of extendable support elements (e.g., two pistons with two corresponding cylinders) as well as a pair of locking elements (e.g., two upper lock supports 17, 117, 217 with two corresponding lower lock supports 20, 120, 220) are provided, alternative embodiments may only include one of each such component. Still further embodiments may include more than two of each component.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/481,854, filed on Apr. 7, 2017, which claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/319,513, filed Apr. 7, 2016, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
4932975 | Main et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4969888 | Scholten et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5236460 | Barber | Aug 1993 | A |
5653763 | Errico et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665122 | Kambin | Sep 1997 | A |
5723013 | Jeanson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5827328 | Buttermann | Oct 1998 | A |
5865848 | Baker | Feb 1999 | A |
5916267 | Tienboon | Jun 1999 | A |
5980522 | Koros et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989290 | Biedermann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6039761 | Li et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6102950 | Vaccaro | Aug 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6176881 | Schar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193756 | Studer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214012 | Karpman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6296665 | Strnad et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6371989 | Chauvin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375682 | Fleischmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375683 | Crozet et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395032 | Gauchet | May 2002 | B1 |
6454806 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6527803 | Crozet et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6562074 | Gerbec et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6582467 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585699 | Ljunggreen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6692495 | Zacouto | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6719796 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723126 | Berry | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730088 | Yeh | May 2004 | B2 |
6764491 | Frey et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6830570 | Frey et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6835207 | Zacouto et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6866682 | An et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875235 | Ferree | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6953477 | Berry | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960232 | Lyons et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981989 | Fleischmann et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7001431 | Bao et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018415 | McKay | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7018416 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7060037 | Lussier et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060073 | Frey et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066958 | Ferree | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7094257 | Mujwid et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7166110 | Yundt | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7204853 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214243 | Taylor | May 2007 | B2 |
7217293 | Branch, Jr. | May 2007 | B2 |
7282063 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291150 | Graf | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7291158 | Crow et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316686 | Dorchak et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7316714 | Gordon et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7351261 | Casey | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7407513 | Alleyne et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419505 | Fleischmann et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7452359 | Michelson | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7470273 | Dougherty-Shah | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481812 | Frey et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485145 | Purcell | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507241 | Levy et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7520900 | Trieu | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7537664 | O'Neill et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7563284 | Coppes et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563286 | Gerber et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7621956 | Paul et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628815 | Baumgartner et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7670359 | Yundt | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708779 | Edie et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722674 | Grotz | May 2010 | B1 |
7731752 | Edie et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7731753 | Reo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771480 | Navarro et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794501 | Edie et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806935 | Navarro et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819921 | Grotz | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824444 | Biscup et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7824445 | Biro et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854766 | Moskowitz et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862618 | White et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883543 | Sweeney | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7935124 | Frey et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7967863 | Frey et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967867 | Barreiro et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7985231 | Sankaran | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7985256 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8021395 | Ben-Mokhtar et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025680 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8057549 | Butterman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062368 | Heinz et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062373 | Fabian, Jr. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070813 | Grotz et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8105382 | Olmos et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8137401 | Stad et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147861 | Jones et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8153785 | Khire et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8187331 | Strohkirch, Jr. et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8192495 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8267939 | Cipoletti et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273124 | Renganath et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8303663 | Jimenez et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8350186 | Jones et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8353961 | McClintock et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366777 | Matthis et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8394143 | Grotz et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8435296 | Kadaba et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8454695 | Grotz et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480741 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8574297 | Stad et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8696751 | Ashley et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8728387 | Jones et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8894710 | Simpson et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8900305 | Stad et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8956413 | Ashley et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8992620 | Ashley et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8992703 | O'Neill et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8998924 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9028550 | Shulock et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9135374 | Jones et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9180010 | Dong et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9814600 | Shulock et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10182923 | Willis et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10285825 | Pinal et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10342673 | Ashley et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20010056302 | Boyer et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020128716 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138146 | Jackson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151976 | Foley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030114899 | Woods et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040030346 | Frey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088054 | Berry | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097928 | Zdeblick et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133273 | Cox | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153065 | Lim | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153156 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186576 | Biscup et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050033437 | Bao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043800 | Paul et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049590 | Alleyne et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085910 | Sweeney | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107881 | Alleyne et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113842 | Bertagnoli et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050197702 | Coppes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216084 | Fleischmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229433 | Cachia | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251260 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256576 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273169 | Purcell | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273170 | Navarro et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273171 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036259 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060085073 | Raiszadeh | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089719 | Trieu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106416 | Raymond et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116767 | Magerl et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142860 | Navarro et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142861 | Murray | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147332 | Jones et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149377 | Navarro et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167547 | Suddaby | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200244 | Assaker | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235426 | Lim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235535 | Ferree et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264968 | Frey et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070050030 | Kim | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050033 | Reo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073395 | Baumgartner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093901 | Grotz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093903 | Cheng | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123987 | Bernstein | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179611 | DiPoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233254 | Grotz et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255409 | Dickson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255413 | Edie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255415 | Edie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270961 | Ferguson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270964 | Strohkirch et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288092 | Bambakidis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021555 | White et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021556 | Edie | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058930 | Edie et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058931 | White et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065082 | Chang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065220 | Alleyne et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065221 | Alleyne et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077150 | Nguyen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086276 | Naka et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097441 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103601 | Biro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114467 | Capote et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140207 | Olmos et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147193 | Matthis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147194 | Grotz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161933 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177387 | Parimore et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183204 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215153 | Butterman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243251 | Stad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281424 | Parry et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288073 | Renganath et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300598 | Barreiro et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005819 | Ben-Mokhtar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005874 | Fleischmann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018661 | Kim et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043312 | Koulisis et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048676 | Fabian, Jr. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090105836 | Frey et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090171389 | Sankaran | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204215 | McClintock et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216331 | Grotz et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222100 | Cipoletti et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270987 | Heinz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100016970 | Kapitan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057204 | Kadaba et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100145455 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145456 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100249930 | Myers | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100286783 | Lechmann et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110015747 | McManus | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110130835 | Ashley et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137416 | Myers | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110270398 | Grotz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288646 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120059469 | Myers et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116518 | Grotz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130387 | Simpson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120245695 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120283830 | Myers | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130096677 | Myers et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130158669 | Sungarian et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130197642 | Ernst | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130197647 | Wolters et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130197648 | Boehm et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204368 | Prevost | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204374 | Milella, Jr. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253650 | Ashley | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140018922 | Marino et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031938 | Lechmann et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140107787 | Stinchfield et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140243983 | Galea et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150148908 | Marino et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160199190 | Sharifi-Mehr et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160199193 | Willis | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170224506 | Ashley et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180064557 | Shulock et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180098860 | To et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180116811 | Bernard et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180125671 | Bernard et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190000644 | Moore et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190231556 | Butler et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1756516 | Apr 2006 | CN |
101610741 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101631516 | Jan 2010 | CN |
101686860 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101686865 | May 2013 | CN |
3729600 | Mar 1989 | DE |
1442715 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1415624 | May 2006 | EP |
2001-518824 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2008-502372 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2002009626 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2003003951 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004016250 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004016205 | May 2004 | WO |
2005112834 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006044786 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008011371 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2007124078 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008039811 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008112607 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008148210 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009033100 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2008121251 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009064787 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009105182 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009114381 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2008086276 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010068725 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011011609 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011150077 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11787340.6 dated Jun. 25, 2014. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP14159619 dated Jun. 12, 2014. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP17165398, dated Aug. 2, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dale dated Jun. 5, 2009 for related PCT/US2009/000974. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 10, 2008 in related International Application No. PCT/US2007/079474. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 13, 2010, in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/067446 filed Dec. 10, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 30, 2009, in related International Application No. PCT/US2008/003776 filed Mar. 21, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 6, 2009, in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/000974 filed Feb. 17, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 11, 2010, in International Application No. PCT/US2010/031247 entitled “Insertion Handle for Implant.” |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 22, 2011 in related International Application No. PCT/US2011/037929. |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2013-512209 dated Jan. 27, 2015. |
Pinal et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/480,781, filed Apr. 6, 2017 titled “Surgical Insertion Instruments”. |
Pinal et al., U.S. Appl. No. 62/319,460, filed Apr. 7, 2016 titled Surgical Insertion Instruments. |
Sharifi-Mehr et al., U.S. Appl. No. 62/245,004, filed Oct. 22, 2015 titled “Method of Applying An Osteoconductive Surface On An Interbody Device”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200229936 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62319513 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15481854 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 16749466 | US |