The present invention relates to the distraction and fusion of vertebral bodies. More specifically, the present invention relates to devices and associated methods for distraction and fusion of vertebral bodies that remain stable when implanted and facilitate fusion following their use for distraction to aid in the correction of spinal deformity by reducing a collapsed disc and establishing sagittal alignment, lordosis, or kyphosis.
The concept of intervertebral fusion for the cervical and lumbar spine following a discectomy was generally introduced in the 1960s. It involved coring out a bone graft from the hip and implanting the graft into the disc space. The disc space was prepared by coring out the space to match the implant. The advantages of this concept were that it provided a large surface area of bone to bone contact and placed the graft under loading forces that allowed osteoconduction and induction enhancing bone fusion. However, the technique is seldom practiced today due to numerous disadvantages including lengthy operation time, destruction of a large portion of the disc space, high risk of nerve injury, and hip pain after harvesting the bone graft.
Presently, at least two devices are commonly used to perform the intervertebral portion of an intervertebral body fusion: the first is the distraction device and the second is the intervertebral body fusion device, often referred to as a cage. Cages can be implanted as standalone devices or as part of a circumferential fusion approach with pedicle screws and rods. The concept is to introduce an implant that will distract a collapsed disc and decompress the nerve root, allow load sharing to enhance bone formation and to implant a device that is small enough to allow implantation with minimal retraction and pulling on nerves.
In a typical intervertebral body fusion procedure, a portion of the intervertebral disc is first removed from between the vertebral bodies. This can be done through either a direct open approach or a minimally invasive approach. Disc shavers, pituitary rongeours, curettes, and/or disc scrapers can be used to remove the nucleus and a portion of either the anterior or posterior annulus to allow implantation and access to the inner disc space. The distraction device is inserted into the cleared space to enlarge the disc space and the vertebral bodies are separated by actuating the distraction device. Enlarging the disc space is important because it also opens the foramen where the nerve root exists. It is important that during the distraction process one does not over-distract the facet joints. An intervertebral fusion device is next inserted into the distracted space and bone growth factor, such as autograft, a collagen sponge with bone morphogenetic protein, or other bone enhancing substance may be inserted into the space within the intervertebral fusion device to promote the fusion of the vertebral bodies.
Intervertebral fusion and distraction can be performed through anterior, posterior, oblique, and lateral approaches. Each approach has its own anatomical challenges, but the general concept is to fuse adjacent vertebra in the cervical thoracic or lumbar spine. Devices have been made from various materials. Such materials include cadaveric cancellous bone, carbon fiber, titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Devices have also been made into different shapes such as a bean shape, football shape, banana shape, wedge shape and a threaded cylindrical cage.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,070,598 and 7,087,055 to Lim et al. disclose minimally invasive devices for distracting the disc space. The devices include scissor-jack-like linkages that are used to distract a pair of endplates associated with adjacent vertebra from a first collapsed orientation to a second expanded orientation. A pull arm device is used to deliver and distract the device in the disc space. However, the device is primarily used for distraction and not subsequent vertebral fusion. The device would not work as a fusion device, because once the pull arm is disconnected from the device, the device will not be stable enough to maintain proper spacing of the vertebrae until fusion can occur. The endplates of the device are also solid and do not permit bone growth for successful fusion.
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0114367 to Meyer discloses a device that uses a scissor-jack-like arrangement to distract a disc space. To solve the instability problem of the scissor-jack arrangement, a curable polymer is injected to fill the disc space and the distraction device is disabled from attempting to support the load. The curable polymer and disabling of the device are necessary because the device could not adequately support the distracted disc space. The base plates of the device have at least two or more degrees of freedom, collectively, in a distracted position and are therefore not stable under the loads encountered supporting the disc space. Absent injection of the polymer, and the support and control supplied by the implanting physician via the removable distraction tool, the base plates would collapse, which could cause severe damage to the vertebral bodies.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a device that can distract adjacent vertebral bodies in a minimally invasive manner while providing stable support for the disc space during fusion; particularly, a device that would allow for angular orientation of the base plates to be matched exactly to the unique alignment, or desired alignment, of a patient's spine.
Improved methods and apparatuses for vertebral body distraction and fusion in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention employ a device that can stay in the body of a patient and stably support the disc space during vertebral fusion following its use as a distraction device. Moreover, various embodiments of the present invention are configurable in a manner allowing angular orientation of the base plates to be matched more precisely to the unique planar alignment, or desired alignment, of adjacent vertebrae of a patient's spine.
In one embodiment, a device can be used for both intervertebral distraction and fusion of an intervertebral disc space. The device can include a first top base plate having a first outer bearing surface configured to interface with a first vertebra of the intervertebral disc space, for example, an end plate of a superior vertebra of the intervertebral disc space, and a second bottom base plate having a second outer bearing surface configured to interface with a second vertebra of the intervertebral disc space, for example an inferior vertebra of the intervertebral disc space. First, second and third arm assemblies can be hinged and connected to the first base plate and the second base plate. In some embodiments, each arm assembly can include a block and a pair of opposing arms. A first threaded actuation member can extend through the first arm assembly and into the second arm assembly, while a second threaded actuation member can extend through the second arm assembly and into the third arm assembly. The actuation members can be configured such that actuation of the first actuation member causes expansion of the first and second arm assemblies, and actuation of the second actuation member causes expansion of the second and third arm assemblies. The first actuation member and the second actuation member can be capable of being actuated independently of each other thereby angling the base plates to enable the angular orientation of the first and second base plates to be matched more precisely to the unique planar alignment, or desired alignment, of adjacent vertebrae of a patient's spine.
The device is designed to be capable of supporting prolonged, compressive loading of greater than 2000-3000 [N]; oblique shear loading of greater than 1200-1500 [N]; and torsion of greater than 10-20 [N]. The device is configured to be inserted into the disc space and distracted from a compressed configuration to an expanded configuration to distract the disc space. Mechanisms for stabilizing that constrain the device to zero, or fewer, degrees of freedom of movement enable the device to stably support the disc space. A bone growth stimulant for promoting vertebral fusion can be inserted into an open space defined by the device, which continues to stably support the disc space during vertebral fusion.
Optionally, some flexibility or compliance can be built into the device, while maintaining the stability of the device, by selecting flexible materials for some of the rigid members/arms and or by manipulating the fits of the numerous joints. Flexible material may also be added to, in, around, or between elements of the device to additionally support flexibility, while maintaining, or in some embodiments, enhancing, the stability of the device by reducing potential hysteresis.
In another embodiment, a method of intervertebral body distraction and fusion involves implantation of a distractible intervertebral body fusion device into an intervertebral disc space. The device is inserted such that a top bearing surface of a top base plate of the device interfaces with an end plate of a superior vertebra of the disc space and a bottom bearing surface of a bottom base plate interfaces with an end plate of an inferior vertebra of the disc space. The device is distracted into an expanded configuration such that the top base plate and bottom base plate are vertically separated from each other to expand the disc space. A bone growth promoting material can then be inserted into the disc space into an open space defined by the device to encourage bone growth and fusion through one or more openings in the base plates. The bone growth promoting material can then be allowed to aid in intervertebral fusion of the adjacent vertebrae while the device stably supports the vertebrae with zero degrees of freedom of movement, or fewer if the device includes redundant constraints.
The above summary of the various embodiments of the invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the invention. This summary represents a simplified overview of certain aspects of the invention to facilitate a basic understanding of the invention.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
In the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, one skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as to not unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention. U.S. Pat. No. 8,628,577, invented by the inventor of the present application, discloses a stable intervertebral body fusion and distraction device. This patent is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety other than the summary of the invention, claims and any express definitions set forth therein.
Referring to
Referring to
Base plates 108 can have a rough surface or teeth 109 to create friction with the base plates of the vertebra to prevent accidental extrusion of the device 100 or to promote bone growth for successful fusion. Base plates 108 or other elements of the device can also in some embodiments be made compliant for exaggerated non-uniform distraction while maintaining the stability of the device 100. Nose portion 104 can be tapered to facilitate insertion of the device 100 into the disc space. Rear portion 106 can also be tapered. In one embodiment, base plate 108 can include a plurality of bores 105. Each bore 105 can be sized to accept a portion of opposing arm 112 to facilitate a hinged coupling.
In one embodiment, device 100 can have a total of twelve arms 112 (four arms for each arm assembly 110a, 110b, and 110c, with two arms of each assembly on each side of the device). In one embodiment, all of the arms 112 can be substantially identical. Referring to
In one embodiment, device can have a total of three blocks—a first or proximal block 122a, a second or central block 122b and a third or distal block 122c. Referring to
In one embodiment, device 100 can include a total of six pins 114. Referring to
Referring to
In one embodiment, first actuation member 120a can extend through first arm assembly 110a into second arm assembly 110a. For example, first actuation member 120a can be threadedly coupled to first arm assembly 110a and rotationally coupled to second arm assembly 110b. Second actuation member 120b can extend through second arm assembly 110a into third arm assembly 110c. For example, second actuation member 120a can be threadedly coupled to second arm assembly 110b and rotationally coupled to third arm assembly 110c.
As shown in
First actuation member 120a and second actuation member 120b are capable of being actuated independently of each other. This independent actuation allows for angular orientation of the base plates 108 to be matched exactly to the unique alignment, or desired planar alignment, of adjacent vertebrae of a patient's spine. Examples of various possible angular orientations of base plates 108 in the distracted state can be seen at
Conversely, actuation of first actuation member 120a in the opposite direction drives blocks 122a and 122b apart, thereby bringing base plates 108 closer together. Likewise, actuation of second actuation member 120b in the opposite direction drives blocks 122b and 122c apart, thereby bringing base plates 108 closer together. This back-drivability of the device 100 is helpful for sizing the device 100 and removing the device 100 if necessary, such as in the event of post-surgical infection, trauma, or failure to fuse.
Referring again to
In another embodiment, in place of non-threaded portion 136 and snap ring 139, portions of the actuation member 120 can be reverse threaded to allow distraction without changing the position of the threaded members along the respective axes of the threaded members helping to keep the device from adversely interacting with the anatomy of the patient.
In various embodiments, device body 102 is shaped to be ergonomic. Device body 102 can have various shapes, such as, for example, rectangular or kidney-shaped. A kidney-shaped device body 102 maximizes contact between the device and the vertebral bodies because the base plates of vertebrae tend to be slightly concave. One or both ends of the device may also be tapered to facilitate insertion. This minimizes the amount of force needed to initially separate the vertebral bodies. In addition, the device may be convex along both its length and its width, or bi-convex. Device body can also be comprised of various materials. Such materials can include, for example, titanium, steel, PEEK, carbon fiber and cobalt chromium. The device can also be constructed in various sizes depending on the type of vertebra and size of patient with which it is being used, for example, specifically for an anterior lumbar interbody fusion, oblique or a lateral interbody fusion. In some embodiments, the threaded member 120 can be micro-machined or split along its length and reconnected using a bellows or flexible torque transmission device, to be able to operate through an angle that may be necessitated by the shape of the device.
In one embodiment, a locking mechanism can be utilized to prevent rotation of the threaded members to ensure the device remains in the distracted state. In one embodiment, the locking mechanism can be activated with the insertion device. In one embodiment, locking may be enhanced by tightening a threaded nut (not shown) against one or more of the blocks 122.
As is demonstrated by a simplified form of device 100 shown in
In operation, device 100 can be placed between adjacent vertebrae or vertebral bodies and used to distract the endplates of the adjacent vertebral bodies and subsequently serve as a fusion device. One or more insertion tools (not depicted) can be used to insert and distract device 100. Referring to
To distract device 100, an insertion tool can be used to rotate actuation members 120 in a first direction. Actuation of threaded member 120a in a first direction drives blocks 122a and 122b closer together, which causes distraction of base plates 108. Likewise, actuation of threaded member 120b in a first direction drives blocks 122b and 122a closer together, which causes distraction of base plates 108. Actuation of threaded members 120a and 120b in the opposite direction respectively drives blocks 122a and 122b and blocks 122b and 122c apart, thereby bringing base plates 108 closer together.
Once base plates 108 are distracted to a desired degree, insertion tools can be disconnected from threaded members 120 and the device 100 can remain within the body. In one embodiment, a locking mechanism can be utilized to prevent rotation of the threaded members to ensure the device remains in the distracted state.
Once device is inserted and supporting the adjacent vertebral bodies, it can be utilized to promote vertebral fusion. Following distraction, a bone growth stimulant, such as autograft, bone morphogenic protein, or bone enhancing material, can be delivered into an open area defined within the device. In one embodiment, bone growth stimulant is delivered after insertion tools are disconnected. In another embodiment, bone growth stimulant is delivered through an open area between insertion tools. In a further embodiment, bone growth stimulant can be delivered through a hollow chamber within the insertion tools. Device is capable of supporting in-vivo loads during the 6 to 12 weeks that fusion occurs between the vertebral bodies. In one embodiment, openings 124 in base plates 108 promote and allow for bone growth into and through the device 100.
In some embodiments, when the device is implanted and in the process of being expanded, as blocks come closer together the blocks compress the bone graft or bone fusion material that can be inserted inside device to force the material out of the internal chamber of the device an in the adjacent vertebral end plates. This will enhance bone integration into the end plates. Some bone material will remain within the cage, which will integrate and fuse the center of the cage to the top and bottom of the end plates. In certain embodiments, the bone material can be injected into the device through one of the longitudinal holes in the proximal block of the device that does not have an actuation member therethrough. This could be done with the inserter device or separate extended syringe. In some embodiments, the top and bottom base plates of the device can be coated to enhance bone integration.
In an alternative embodiment, a pin can extend vertical through the device to stabilize the proximal end of the device. Such a device could be expanded utilizing only a distal set of arm assemblies and would provide only lordotic angles. Alternatively the pin could stabilize the distal end of the device, which could then be expanded with a single screw and one or more proximally located arm assemblies to provide kyphotic angles.
Although the various devices described herein are described as being brought from a compressed configuration to an expanded configuration by rotation of a threaded member, the devices can be distracted by any other type of actuation member. In some embodiments, mechanisms other than threaded members can be used to distract the device. Such mechanisms include, for example, a pop-rivet mechanism, a sardine key and ribbon, a tourniquet and wire, a saw blade/ratchet, a zip-tie-like mechanism, piezo-electric inch worm motors and shape changing materials such as a shape member alloy or a conducting polymer actuator. These alternative locking mechanisms could be designed to make the device behave as if it were locked with a threaded member, preventing the device from being compressed as well as extended, or these mechanisms could afford the device the capability to ratchet upwards post implantation if such action would benefit the patient or provide additional therapy.
Various embodiments of implantation procedures for the disclosed embodiments of expandable intervertebral cage devices may be as follows:
Lumbar: A lumbar implant can be 8 mm in height, expandable to 14 mm in height, with a length of 25-30 mm and a width of 10-12 mm. The implant can be inserted through a minimally invasive tubular port that goes through the muscle of the lumbar spine and into the lumbar disc space. Prior to inserting the implant, the lumbar disc should be completely removed. Other embodiments for the lumbar spine include larger sizes for anterior, posterior, transforaminal, oblique lateral, and lateral interbody fusions.
Cervical: A cervical implant can be 6 mm in height, expandable to 10 mm in height, with a length of 10 mm and a width of 6 mm. The implant can be inserted after anterior cervical surgical exposure. The cervical disc should be completely removed prior to insertion of the implant.
Various embodiments of systems, devices, and methods have been described herein. These embodiments are given only by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. It should be appreciated, moreover, that the various features of the embodiments that have been described may be combined in various ways to produce numerous additional embodiments. Moreover, while various materials, dimensions, shapes, implantation locations, etc. have been described for use with disclosed embodiments, others besides those disclosed may be utilized without exceeding the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2106088 | De Tar | Jan 1938 | A |
2231221 | Rector | Feb 1941 | A |
2453656 | Bullard, III | Nov 1948 | A |
2666334 | Nalle | Jan 1954 | A |
2711105 | Williams | Jun 1955 | A |
2842976 | Young | Jul 1958 | A |
2891408 | Burt, Jr. | Jun 1959 | A |
3386128 | Vyvyan | Jun 1968 | A |
3449971 | Posh | Jun 1969 | A |
3575475 | Boerner | Apr 1971 | A |
3596863 | Kaspareck | Aug 1971 | A |
3597938 | Hellen | Aug 1971 | A |
3700289 | Bilinski et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3700290 | Ensinger | Oct 1972 | A |
3708925 | Ainoura | Jan 1973 | A |
3709132 | Farrell et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3916596 | Hawley | Nov 1975 | A |
3985000 | Hartz | Oct 1976 | A |
3988906 | Smith | Nov 1976 | A |
4261211 | Haberland | Apr 1981 | A |
4396047 | Balkus | Aug 1983 | A |
4478109 | Kobelt | Oct 1984 | A |
4516303 | Kloster | May 1985 | A |
4528864 | Craig | Jul 1985 | A |
4559717 | Scire et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4630495 | Smith | Dec 1986 | A |
4691586 | van Leijenhorst et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4694703 | Routson | Sep 1987 | A |
4869552 | Tolleson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5133108 | Esnault | Jul 1992 | A |
5181371 | Deworth | Jan 1993 | A |
5196857 | Chiappetta et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198932 | Takamura | Mar 1993 | A |
5222986 | Wright | Jun 1993 | A |
5313852 | Arena | May 1994 | A |
5374556 | Bennett et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5439377 | Milanovich | Aug 1995 | A |
5445471 | Wexler et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5645599 | Samani | Jul 1997 | A |
5664457 | Nejati | Sep 1997 | A |
5904479 | Staples | May 1999 | A |
5960670 | Iverson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980252 | Samchukov et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988006 | Fleytman | Nov 1999 | A |
6045579 | Hochshuler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056491 | Hsu | May 2000 | A |
6136031 | Middleton | Oct 2000 | A |
6175989 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6315797 | Middleton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350317 | Hao et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6378172 | Schrage | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395035 | Bresina et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6454806 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484608 | Ziavras | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517772 | Woolf | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6554526 | Egelandsdal | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6616695 | Crozet et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6641614 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6719796 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6752832 | Neumann | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772479 | Hinkley et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6802229 | Lambert | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6808537 | Michelson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6863673 | Gerbec et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6932844 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953477 | Berry | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7018415 | McKay | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7051610 | Stoianovici et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7070598 | Lim et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087055 | Lim et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7201751 | Zucherman et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7273373 | Horiuchi | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7308747 | Smith et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316381 | Häcker et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7410201 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7425103 | Perez-Sanchez | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7435032 | Murphey et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7547325 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7584682 | Hsiao | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7611538 | Belliard et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632281 | Errico et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7674296 | Rhoda et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682376 | Trieu | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708779 | Edie et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7712389 | Wang | May 2010 | B2 |
7753958 | Gordon et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758645 | Studer | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758648 | Castleman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7892285 | Viker | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896919 | Belliard et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947078 | Siegal | May 2011 | B2 |
7985256 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8070813 | Grotz et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8192495 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8303663 | Jimenez et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8523944 | Jimenez et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8628577 | Jimenez | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8771360 | Jimenez et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20020128716 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030077110 | Knowles | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030233145 | Landry et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040049271 | Biedermann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040111157 | Ralph et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040153156 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040225364 | Richelsoph et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050000228 | De Sousa et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033431 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050095384 | Wittmeyer | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113921 | An et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113924 | Buttermann | May 2005 | A1 |
20050175406 | Perez-Sanchez | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050261769 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004447 | Mastrorio et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004455 | Leonard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025862 | Villiers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060129244 | Ensign | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149385 | McKay | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184171 | Biedermann et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060247781 | Francis | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293752 | Moumene et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032791 | Greenhalgh et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049943 | Moskowitz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083267 | Miz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129730 | Woods et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185577 | Malek | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191954 | Hansell et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191958 | Abdou | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198089 | Moskowitz et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219634 | Greenhalgh et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222100 | Husted et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070255415 | Edie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282449 | de Villiers et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293329 | Glimpel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293948 | Bagga et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026903 | Flugrad et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077246 | Fehling et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091211 | Gately | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100179 | Ruggeri et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103601 | Biro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114367 | Meyer | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140207 | Olmos | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147194 | Grotz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161920 | Melkent | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161931 | Perez-Cruet et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168855 | Giefer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183204 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188941 | Grotz | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210039 | Brun | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221694 | Warnick et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234736 | Trieu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080281423 | Sheffer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292392 | Voellmer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319487 | Fielding et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012564 | Chirico et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076614 | Arramon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090164017 | Sommerich et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090210061 | Sledge | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222100 | Cipoletti et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100004688 | Maas et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100082109 | Greenhalgh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094305 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100185291 | Jimenez et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192715 | Vauchel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100209184 | Jimenez et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110015638 | Pischl et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054616 | Kamran et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093075 | Duplessis et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112644 | Zilberstein et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138948 | Jimenez et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160861 | Jimenez et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110270398 | Grotz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120116518 | Grotz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158071 | Jimenez et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120323329 | Jimenez et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130053966 | Jimenez et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130144388 | Emery et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130197642 | Ernst | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130317615 | Jimenez et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140012383 | Triplett et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039622 | Glerum et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140194991 | Jimenez | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1342456 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1552797 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1881209 | Jan 2008 | EP |
05-81194 | Apr 1993 | JP |
2004-301135 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2008-208932 | Sep 2008 | JP |
WO 2004026188 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004109155 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005081330 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005096975 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006094535 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006116052 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006125329 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007002583 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007009107 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007028140 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007076377 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007111979 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008137192 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009018349 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2010078520 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2010/042941, filed Jul. 22, 2010, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 25, 2011. |
PCT/US2010/042915, filed Jul. 22, 2010, Search Report dated Apr. 22, 2011. |
PCT/US2009/069876, filed Dec. 30, 2009, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 27, 2010, 12 pages. |
PCT/US2009/069958, filed Dec. 31, 2009, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 29, 2010, 9 pages. |
European Application No. EP 09837185, European Search Report dated May 14, 2013, 7 pages. |
PCT/US2009/069958, filed Dec. 31, 2009, Transmittal of IPRP dated Jul. 14, 2011, 4 pages. |
Wenzel Spine, Inc., VariLift®-L Expandable Interbody Fusion Device: A proven solution for stand-alone fusion, Product Overview, 12 pages, 2010. |
Peter A. Halverson, et. al., Tension-based Multi-stable Compliant: Rolling-contact Elements, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo UT, USA 84602, 34 pages, 2007. |
Just L. Herder, Force Directed Design of Laparoscopic Forceps, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 8 pages, 1998. |
Alexander H. Slocum, Fundamentals of Design, 2005. |
W. Küsswetter, A Supplementary Instrumentation for Posterior Fusion of Spine in Scoliosis, Archives of Orthopedic Traumatic Surgery, 1980, 1 page. |
Chou et al., Efficacy of Anterior Cervical Fusion: Comparison of Titanium Cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2008, pp. 1240-1245. |
Amelie Jeanneau, et. al., A Compliant Rolling Contact Joint and its Application in a 3-DOF Planar Parallel Mechanism with Kinematic Analysis, ASME, Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 9 pages, 2004. |
Hunter et al., Overview of Medical Devices, Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, Aug. 2001, pp. 89-140, vol. 30, No. 4, ISSN: 0363-0188. |
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., CAPSTONE Instrument Set Technique, http://www.mtortho.com/public/capstone.pdf , © 2005, 25 pages. |
Medtronic, Capstone Peek Spinal System Surgical Technique, http://www.mtortho.com/public/capstone—peek—st.pdf, © 2009, 36 pages. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/651,266, filed Dec. 31, 2009, Inventors Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,465, filed Jul. 22, 2010, now U.S. Patent No. 8,303,663, Inventors Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,869, filed Jul. 22, 2010, Inventors Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,410, filed Jul. 22, 2011, Inventor Jimenez. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,534, filed Oct. 26, 2012, Inventor Jimenez. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/024,764, filed Sep. 12, 2013, Inventor Jimenez et al. |
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,608, filed Mar. 19, 2009, now U.S. Patent No. 8,628,577, issued Jan. 14, 2014. Inventors: Jimenez. |
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,994, filed Dec. 31, 2009, now U.S. Patent No. 8,523,944, issued Sep. 3, 2013. Inventors: Jimenez et al. |
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,463, filed Aug. 22, 2012, now U.S. Patent No. 8,771,360, issued Jul. 8, 2014. Inventors: Jimenez et al. |
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,356, filed May 10, 2013. Inventors: Jimenez et al. |
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 14/153,281, filed Jan. 13, 2014. Inventors: Jimenez. |