During wellbore operations, it is typical to “hang” a liner onto a casing such that the liner supports an extended string of tubular below it. As used herein, “tubing string” refers to a series of connected pipe sections, casing sections, joints, screens, blanks, cross-over tools, downhole tools, and the like, inserted into a wellbore, whether used for drilling, work-over, production, injection, completion, or other processes. A tubing string may be run in and out of the casing, and similarly, tubing string can be run in an uncased wellbore or section of wellbore. Further, in many cases a tool may be run on a wireline or coiled tubing instead of a tubing string, as those of skill in the art will recognize.
Expandable liner hangers may generally be used to secure the liner within a previously set wellbore tubular (e.g., casing or liner string). Expandable liner hangers may be “set” by expanding the liner hanger radially outward into gripping and sealing contact with the wellbore tubular. For example, expandable liner hangers may be expanded by use of hydraulic pressure to drive an expanding cone, wedge, or “pig,” through the liner hanger. Other methods may be used, such as mechanical swaging, explosive expansion, memory metal expansion, swellable material expansion, electromagnetic force-driven expansion, etc.
The expansion process may typically be performed by means of a setting tool used to convey the liner hanger into the wellbore. The setting tool may be interconnected between a work string (e.g., a tubular string made up of drill pipe or other segmented or continuous tubular elements) and the liner hanger. The setting tool may expand the liner hanger into anchoring and sealing engagement with the casing.
Reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the drawings and descriptions that follow, like parts are typically marked throughout the specification and drawings with the same reference numerals, respectively. The drawn figures are not necessarily, but may be, to scale. Certain features of the disclosure may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form and some details of certain elements may not be shown in the interest of clarity and conciseness. The present disclosure may be implemented in embodiments of different forms. Specific embodiments are described in detail and are shown in the drawings, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the principles of the disclosure, and is not intended to limit the disclosure to that illustrated and described herein. It is to be fully recognized that the different teachings of the embodiments discussed herein may be employed separately or in any suitable combination to produce desired results. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles and aspects of the disclosure, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass equivalents thereof. Additionally, the term, “or,” as used herein, refers to a non-exclusive or, unless otherwise indicated.
Unless otherwise specified, use of the terms “connect,” “engage,” “couple,” “attach,” or any other like term describing an interaction between elements is not meant to limit the interaction to direct interaction between the elements and may also include indirect interaction between the elements described.
Unless otherwise specified, use of the terms “up,” “upper,” “upward,” “uphole,” “upstream,” or other like terms shall be construed as generally away from the bottom, terminal end of a well, regardless of the wellbore orientation; likewise, use of the terms “down,” “lower,” “downward,” “downhole,” or other like terms shall be construed as generally toward the bottom, terminal end of a well, regardless of the wellbore orientation. Use of any one or more of the foregoing terms shall not be construed as denoting positions along a perfectly vertical or horizontal axis. Unless otherwise specified, use of the term “subterranean formation” shall be construed as encompassing both areas below exposed earth and areas below earth covered by water, such as ocean or fresh water.
As can be appreciated, liner hangers (e.g., expanded liner hangers) should support the substantial weight of the attached tubing string below. For deep and extra-deep wells, subsea wells, etc., the tubing string places substantial axial load on the hanging mechanism engaging the liner hanger to the casing. There is a need for improved methods and apparatus providing a liner hanger having an anchoring mechanism and sealing mechanism capable of supporting the substantial axial loads imparted by longer and heavier liner strings. Furthermore, there is a need in certain situations to improve performance of liner hanger designs that have failed to achieve adequate axial load holding in an uphole direction when placed in collapse by pressure from downhole.
Additionally, the industry is currently employing high grade steels (e.g., with minimum yield strengths of 125 ksi, 140 ksi, 150 ksi, etc.), as well as increased wall thickness, for the wellbore tubular in many high pressure/high temperature applications. The present disclosure has recognized that the higher minimum yield strength and increased wall thickness leads to various problems. For example, the present disclosure has recognized that in such situations traditional anchoring ridges (e.g., with minimum yield strengths of 110 ksi or less) are unable to bite in the wellbore tubular, as well as are unable to deform the wellbore tubular (e.g., into a wave form), when expanded. Accordingly, the traditional anchoring ridges, particularly when used with high grade steel wellbore tubulars, can only rely on the metal-to-metal friction between the anchoring ridges and the wellbore tubular as the anchoring means. Unfortunately, in certain applications the metal-to-metal friction fails to provide the required anchoring capacity. Moreover, the traditional anchoring ridges, again particularly when used with high grade steel wellbore tubulars, fail to provide the necessary high pressure seal (e.g., from below).
The present disclosure has recognized, for the first time, that axial load performance of liner hangers can be improved by localized hardening of the one or more of the anchoring ridges. For example, the localized hardening of the one or more of the anchoring ridges allows the one or more ridges to expand, which would not be as possible if the entire continuous anchoring ridge was hardened. In at least one embodiment, one or more of the anchoring ridges are locally hardened, such that the locally hardened sections would have a minimum yield strength of at least 175 ksi, if not at least 200 ksi or at least 250 ksi. For example, in one or more embodiments one or more of the anchoring ridges are locally hardened, such that the locally hardened sections would have a minimum yield strength at least as high as the hardness of carburized steel (e.g., 300 ksi).
In at least one embodiment, one or more of the anchoring ridges are locally hardened using an additive manufacturing technique. For example, one or more of the anchoring ridges may be locally hardened using a direct metal deposition process, for example employing robotic arm(s) to deposit a thin metal having a minimum yield strength of at least 175 ksi to localized regions of the anchoring ridge.
In at least one other embodiment, one or more of the anchoring ridges are locally hardened using carburization. The term carburization (e.g., including carburizing, carburising, carburisation, etc.), as used herein, means a heat treatment process in which iron or steel absorbs carbon while the metal is heated in the presence of a carbon-bearing material, such as charcoal or carbon monoxide. The intent is to make the metal harder. Depending on the amount of time and temperature, the affected area can vary in carbon content. Longer carburizing times and higher temperatures typically increase the depth of carbon diffusion. Furthermore, when the iron or steel is cooled rapidly by quenching, the higher carbon content on the outer surface becomes hard due to the transformation from austenite to martensite, while the core remains soft and tough as a ferritic and/or pearlite microstructure.
The number of anchoring ridges having the locally hardened surface for a given design may vary. In at least one embodiment, one or more of the anchoring ridges have the locally hardened surface. In yet another embodiment, at least 20 percent of the anchoring ridges have the locally hardened surface, if not at least 50 percent of the anchoring ridges. In yet another embodiment, at least 75 percent of the anchoring ridges have the locally hardened surface, if not 100 percent.
The present disclosure has further recognized, for the first time, that axial load performance of liner hangers can be improved by replacing one or more of the continuous (e.g., circular) anchoring ridges with a ring of discrete slip teeth, each having a minimum yield strength of at least 175 ksi, if not at least 200 ksi, if not at least 250 ksi, or up to 300 ksi or above. In certain embodiments, less than all of the continuous anchoring ridges are replaced with the ring of discrete slip teeth. For example, the uphole and downhole most continuous anchoring ridges could be replaced with the ring of discrete slip teeth, every other continuous anchoring ridge replaced with the ring of discrete slip teeth, etc. Accordingly, the ring(s) of discrete slip teeth could be used to improve the anchoring capacity (e.g., the number of rings of discrete slip teeth could be chosen based upon the anchor load requirements of the well system), whereas the continuous anchoring ridges could be used for sealing capacity (e.g., the number of continuous anchoring ridges could be chosen based upon the sealing requirements of the well system).
In at least one embodiment, the discrete slip teeth may be placed within one or more shallow grooves in the radially expandable tubular. In one or more embodiments, the discrete slip teeth are each individually press fit within the one or more shallow grooves. In one or more other embodiments, the plurality of discrete slip teeth are coupled to a C-ring that is press fit within the one or more grooves. In yet another embodiment, the plurality of discrete slip teeth are coupled to each other using an elastic material that would hold the plurality of discrete slip teeth within the one or more shallow grooves. In even yet another embodiment, the plurality of slip teeth are coupled to an open end ring by way of inward pointing slender beams, the inward pointing slender beams holding the plurality of slip teeth within the one or more shallow grooves. Nevertheless, other coupling mechanisms, including adhesives and/or spot welds could be used to maintain the plurality of slip teeth within the one or more shallow grooves.
The embodiments disclosed above have been shown to greatly improve the anchoring capacity of the expandable liner hanger assembly. For example, finite element analysis (FEA) simulation of the embodiments discloses show that the anchoring capacity may be improved by at least 30%. Accordingly, a 1.5 m expandable liner hanger assembly according to the present disclosure could provide the same anchoring capacity as a 4 m traditional expandable liner hanger assembly.
In the illustrated embodiment, a liner hanger system 130 (e.g., expandable liner hanger system) is positioned within the wellbore 110. The liner hanger system 130, in at least one embodiment, includes an expandable cone (not shown), as well as an expandable liner hanger assembly 135 disposed thereabout. In at least one embodiment, the expandable liner hanger assembly 135 includes a radially expandable tubular 140. In the illustrated embodiment, the radially expandable tubular 140 defines an interior passageway and an exterior surface. In accordance with one embodiment, the expandable liner hanger assembly 135 additionally includes one or more continuous anchoring ridges 145 extending radially outward from the radially expandable tubular 140. In accordance with one embodiment of the disclosure, the radially expandable tubular 140 is configured to move from an initial state (as shown) wherein the one or more continuous anchoring ridges 145 are not in contact with the wellbore tubular 120, to an expanded state (e.g., shown in
Further to the embodiment of
As shown, the expandable liner hanger assembly 135 may be hung, extending downhole from a lower end of wellbore tubular 120. An annulus 170 may be created between the wellbore tubular 120 and the liner hanger system 130. In embodiments, the liner hanger system 130 can support additional wellbore casing, operational tubulars or tubing strings, completion strings, downhole tools, etc., for positioning at greater depths.
As used herein, the terms “tubular,” “liner,” and “casing” are used generally to describe tubular wellbore items, used for various purposes in wellbore operations. Tubulars, liners, and casings can be made from various materials (metal, plastic, composite, etc.), can be expanded or unexpanded as part of an installation procedure, and can be segmented or continuous. It is not necessary for a tubular, liner or casing to be cemented into position. Any type of tubular, liner, or casing may be used in keeping with the principles of the present invention.
As further illustrated in
In embodiments, as also shown in
In
In the illustrated embodiment, the plurality of localized hardened sections 150 are a plurality of localized hardened layers placed circumferentially there around. In accordance with this embodiment, the plurality of localized hardened layers may have a thickness of 0.25 μm or less. In yet another embodiment, the plurality of hardened layers may have a thickness ranging from 0.025 μm to 0.076 μm.
In the illustrated embodiment, a plurality of ductile sections 210 are placed between the plurality of localized hardened sections 150. The plurality of ductile sections 210, in at least one embodiment, comprise the same material as the radially expandable tubular 140, but have not been locally hardened like the localized hardened sections 150. In yet another embodiment, the plurality of ductile sections 210 comprise a different material and minimum yield strength than the radially expandable tubular 140 and/or the localized hardened sections 150. In at least one embodiment, the plurality of localized hardened sections 150 have a hardened section minimum yield strength at least 10% greater than a ductile section minimum yield strength of the plurality of ductile sections 210. In yet another embodiment, the plurality of localized hardened sections 150 have a hardened section minimum yield strength at least 50% greater than a ductile section minimum yield strength of the plurality of ductile sections 210. In yet even another embodiment, the plurality of localized hardened sections 150 have a hardened section minimum yield strength at least 100% greater than a ductile section minimum yield strength of the plurality of ductile sections 210.
In the illustrated embodiment, each of the localized hardened sections 420 extend circumferentially around the radially expandable tubular 410 by an angle (β), wherein the plurality of ductile sections 430 each extend circumferentially around the radially expandable tubular 410 an angle (Ω). In at least one embodiment, the angle (β) is 20 degrees or less, if not 10 degrees or less. In at least one other embodiment, the angle (Ω) is 10 degrees or less, if not 5 degrees or less. For example, a ratio of the angle (β) to the angle (Ω), in at least one embodiment, ranges from 4:1 to 1:1.
In the illustrated embodiment of
In the illustrated embodiment of
In certain embodiments, the radially expandable tubular 540 may include a plurality of spaced apart shallow grooves 542. In such an embodiment, a first set of plurality of discrete slip teeth could be positioned in a first shallow groove, and a second set of plurality of discrete slip teeth could be positioned in a second shallow groove, such as shown in
In certain embodiments, the plurality of discrete slip teeth 545 are individually press fit within the shallow grooves. Nevertheless, in the embodiment of
In the illustrated embodiment, each of the discrete slip teeth 820 extend circumferentially around the radially expandable tubular by an angle (Γ). In at least one embodiment, the angle (Γ) is 30 degrees or less. In yet another embodiment, the angle (Γ) is 20 degrees or less, if not 10 degrees or less or 5 degrees or less.
Generally, in the downhole setting, elements with pressure from above (uphole) are typically “boosted” or enhanced because of the pressure on the inner diameter of the liner hanger. Elements with pressure from below (downhole) are typically placed in collapse, thus reducing the contact stress and liner hanger performance when reacting to load from below (downhole). The pressure from below (downhole) may be sealed off by placing one or more sealing members 1110 on the bottom of expandable liner hanger 1100—thus limiting the influence of collapse pressure—as illustrated in
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Aspects disclosed herein include:
Aspects A, B, C and D may have one or more of the following additional elements in combination: Element 1: wherein the at least one of the one or more continuous anchoring ridges has at least four localized hardened sections placed circumferentially there around. Element 2: wherein the at least four localized hardened sections are placed circumferentially equidistance there around. Element 3: wherein the at least one of the one or more continuous anchoring ridges has at least eighteen localized hardened sections placed circumferentially there around. Element 4: wherein the at least eighteen localized hardened sections are placed circumferentially equidistance there around. Element 5: wherein the at least one of the one or more continuous anchoring ridges has a plurality of ductile sections placed between the plurality of localized hardened sections. Element 6: wherein the at least eighteen localized hardened sections each extend circumferentially around the radially expandable tubular an angle (β) of 10 degrees or less. Element 7: wherein the plurality of ductile sections each extend circumferentially around the radially expandable tubular an angle (Ω) of 5 degrees or less. Element 8: wherein a ratio of the angle (β) to the angle (Ω) ranges from 4:1 to 1:1. Element 9: wherein the plurality of localized hardened sections have a hardened section minimum yield strength at least 10% greater than a ductile section minimum yield strength of the plurality of ductile sections. Element 10: wherein the plurality of localized hardened sections have a hardened section minimum yield strength at least 50% greater than a ductile section minimum yield strength of the plurality of ductile sections. Element 11: wherein the plurality of localized hardened sections have a hardened section minimum yield strength at least 100% greater than a ductile section minimum yield strength of the plurality of ductile sections. Element 12: wherein the plurality of ductile sections are radially outside of the plurality of hardened sections when the radially expandable tubular is in the initial state. Element 13: wherein the plurality of localized hardened sections are a plurality of localized hardened layers placed circumferentially there around. Element 14: wherein the plurality of hardened layers have a thickness of 0.25 μm or less. Element 15: wherein the plurality of hardened layers have a thickness ranging from 0.025 μm to 0.076 μm. Element 16: wherein each of the plurality of discrete slip teeth has a minimum yield strength of at least 175 ksi. Element 17: wherein each of the plurality of discrete slip teeth has a minimum yield strength of at least 200 ksi. Element 18: wherein each of the plurality of discrete slip teeth has a minimum yield strength of at least 250 ksi. Element 19: wherein the plurality of discrete slip teeth are at least four discrete slip teeth placed circumferentially around the radially expandable tubular. Element 20: wherein the at least four discrete slip teeth are placed circumferentially equidistance around the radially expandable tubular. Element 21: wherein the plurality of discrete slip teeth are at least eighteen discrete slip teeth placed circumferentially around the radially expandable tubular. Element 22: wherein the at least eighteen discrete slip teeth are placed circumferentially equidistance around the radially expandable tubular. Element 23: wherein the at least eighteen discrete slip teeth each extend circumferentially around the radially expandable tubular an angle (Γ) of 10 degrees or less. Element 24: wherein the plurality of discrete slip teeth are each individually press fit within the shallow groove. Element 25: wherein the plurality of discrete slip teeth are configured as a C-ring that is press fit within the shallow groove. Element 26: wherein the plurality of discrete slip teeth are coupled to each other using an elastic material that holds the plurality of discrete slip teeth within the shallow groove. Element 27: wherein the plurality of discrete slip teeth are coupled to an open end ring by way of inward pointing slender beams, the inward pointing slender beams holding the plurality of discrete slip teeth within the shallow groove. Element 28: wherein the shallow groove is a first shallow groove and the plurality of discrete slip teeth are a first set of plurality of discrete slip teeth, and further including a second shallow groove located in the exterior surface and a second set of plurality of discrete slip teeth placed within the second shallow groove circumferentially around the radially expandable tubular. Element 29: further including one or more continuous anchoring ridges extending radially outward from the radially expandable tubular. Element 30: wherein the one or more continuous anchoring ridges are positioned between the first set of plurality of discrete slip teeth and the second set of plurality of discrete slip teeth.
Those skilled in the art to which this application relates will appreciate that other and further additions, deletions, substitutions and modifications may be made to the described embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2152628 | Gauthey | Apr 1939 | A |
4663513 | Webber | May 1987 | A |
4832125 | Taylor | May 1989 | A |
4919460 | Milberger et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5303518 | Strickland | Apr 1994 | A |
5542473 | Pringle | Aug 1996 | A |
6029748 | Forsyth et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6098717 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6378606 | Swor et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6793022 | Vick | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7360592 | Mcmahan | Apr 2008 | B2 |
9255467 | Thomson et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9316084 | Carter | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9580981 | Zhong et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9695651 | Gorrara et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9752400 | Hazelip et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10337298 | Braddick | Jul 2019 | B2 |
11118434 | Hazelip et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11156065 | Zhong et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11225000 | Yu et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
11248450 | Hazelip | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11248451 | Sevadjian et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11359465 | Williams | Jun 2022 | B2 |
20010045289 | Cook et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047866 | Cook et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020014339 | Ross | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020139540 | Lauritzen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030042022 | Lauritzen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030047322 | Maguire et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030094768 | Kamiya et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040149418 | Bosma et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040244994 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050011650 | Harrall et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050052019 | Schroeder | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060237188 | McMahan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070257486 | Filippov et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20120097384 | Valencia | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120205091 | Turley | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120312542 | Varghese et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130248209 | Watson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140000911 | Gorrara et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140008082 | O'Brien et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140020911 | Martinez | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140174763 | Zhong et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150068733 | Dilber et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150218903 | Sellers, Jr. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160053591 | Hallundbaek et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160090801 | Hazelip et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160326830 | Hallundbaek et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160356131 | Humphrey et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160369587 | Stæhr | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170022775 | Spitz et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20180045016 | Radtke et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180112486 | Potts et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180135369 | Parekh et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190218873 | Davis et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190316434 | Davies et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190330943 | Givens et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200149375 | Bermudes et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200173248 | Yee et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200332604 | Whiddon et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200370383 | Hazelip | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210010353 | Hazelip et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210011576 | Suto et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210087902 | Saeed | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210140263 | Dockweiler et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210310339 | Williams | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220145712 | Bermudez et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20230003097 | Vasques | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230220743 | Vasques | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230349270 | Furlong et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230374890 | Zhong et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230407730 | Zhong et al. | Dec 2023 | A1 |
20240117716 | Zhong et al. | Apr 2024 | A1 |
20240151123 | Loh et al. | May 2024 | A1 |
20240229614 | Chevallier et al. | Jul 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0289108 | Feb 1988 | EP |
2789791 | Oct 2014 | EP |
3667014 | Jun 2020 | EP |
2011151139 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2020185208 | Sep 2020 | WO |
2022177939 | Aug 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dutta, B., et al., “Additive Manufacturing by Direct Metal Deposition,” Advanced Materials & Processes, May 2011, 4 pages. |
Labudovic, M., “A three dimensional model for direct laser metal powder deposition and rapid prototyping,” Journal of Materials Science 38, 2003, pp. 35-49, Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
TIW XPak System Hanger Packer, https://www.tiwoiltools.com/xpak-liner-hanger.html, 2018, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230374890 A1 | Nov 2023 | US |